Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the CAE First Quarter Conference Call. Please be advised that this call is being recorded today. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Andrew Arnovitz. Mr. Arnovitz, please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's remarks, including management's outlook for fiscal year '20 and answers to questions, contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent our expectations as of today, August 14, 2019 and accordingly are subject to change. Such statements are based on assumptions that may not materialize and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially, and listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. A description of the risk factors and assumptions that may affect future results is contained in CAE's annual MD&A available on our corporate website and in our filings with the Canadian Securities Administrators on SEDAR and on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR site. On the call with me this afternoon are Marc Parent, CAE's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Sonya Branco, our Chief Financial Officer. After remarks from Marc and Sonya, we'll take questions from financial analysts and institutional investors. Following the conclusion of that Q&A period, we'll open the call to questions from members of the media. Let me now turn the call over to Marc.

Thank you, Andrew, and good afternoon to everyone joining us on the call. I'll first discuss some highlights of the quarter, and then Sonya will review the detailed financials. I'll come back at the end to talk about our outlook. CAE had a good start to the fiscal year with double-digit revenue and operating income growth and $940 million of orders for a 1.14x book-to-sales. CAE's total backlog at the end of the quarter was $9.4 billion. Performance was led by Civil, which delivered strong operating income growth and continued to add significantly to backlog. I'm especially pleased with our market momentum, winning the confidence of our airline and business customers with our innovative training solutions. Our Defence is more variable on a quarterly basis, and first quarter results reflect this tendency as well as an income growth profile that's more heavily weighted to the second half of the fiscal year. And in Healthcare, the revenue momentum we saw at the end of last year continued into the first quarter. Looking more closely at Civil. We booked $694 million of orders in Q1, including multiyear pilot training agreements with airlines, including the LATAM, SAS and Air Europa. We also signed 5 -- new 5-year -- 5 training contracts with Philippines' AirAsia, which incorporates our highly innovative and data-driven CAE Rise training system. Civil sold 9 full-flight simulators during the quarter, including 3 to Southwest Airlines for the Boeing 737 Max, 1 to Korean Air for the Boeing -- for the Airbus A330 and 1 to Hawaiian Airlines for the Boeing 787. Overall, training center utilization remained strong with 76% on our network of nearly 300 full-flight simulators deployed. In Defence, we booked orders for $220 million, including contracts with Lockheed Martin for C-130J simulators for the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Marine Corps. Other notable orders include a contract with L3 MAS to continue providing in-service support for the Royal Canadian Air Force's CF-18 fleet and contracts to upgrade the German Eurofighter and Tornado aircraft simulators. New awards also included contracts for naval training solutions for the Canadian Surface Combatant Program and upgrades to the Swedish Navy's Naval Warfare Training System. And in Healthcare, we continued to pursue a larger segment for the Healthcare simulation market with our expanded sales force. We announced a new CAE Centre of Excellence for simulation-based training at ESPA-Montreal, which is an innovative health care education and industry partnership designed to improve patient care. We also developed and delivered a simulation solution to medical device company, Baylis Medical, to support one of its cardiovascular systems for physicians. As well, we collaborated with the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing to develop courseware for student nurses practicing with our CAE Juno manikin. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Sonya, who will provide you a detailed look at our financial performance. I'll return at the end of the call to comment on our outlook. Sonya?

Thank you, Marc, and good afternoon, everyone. Consolidated revenue for the first quarter was $825.6 million, up 14% compared to $722 million in the first quarter of last year. And segment operating income, before specific items, was $113.3 million, up 15% from $98.5 million last year. Quarterly net income before specific items was $63.2 million or $0.24 per share, which is 8% lower than the $0.26 we've recorded in the first quarter last year. Net finance expense for the first quarter was $34.9 million, up from $16 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. We had higher interest resulting from the long-term debt we issued at the end of last year to fund the acquisition of the Bombardier BAT business as well as we had a higher interest on these liabilities because of the adoption of IFRS 16. Income taxes this quarter were $13 million, representing an effective tax rate of 17%, which is up from 13% for the first quarter last year. The higher tax rate was mainly due to the impact of tax audits in Canada last year, partially offset by a change in the mix of income from various jurisdictions. Cash provided by operating activities this quarter was up 18% to $137.8 million compared to $117.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Free cash flow was negative $102 million in the quarter compared to negative $86 million last year. We had higher investments related to work-in-progress inventory for simulator products to be delivered over the balance of the year, and we had lower payables. We usually see a higher investment in noncash working capital accounts in the first half of the year. And as in previous years, we expect a portion of the noncash working capital investment to reverse in the second half. Uses…

Thanks, Sonya. We continue to see good momentum with our training strategy, which is supported by secular growth trends across all of our markets and underpin CAE's investment thesis. In Civil, market fundamentals remain supportive, with long-term passenger traffic growth and expanding global in-service fleet of aircraft. Civil aviation is a highly regulated industry, and the aviation safety imperative underscores the criticality of pilot training. This also -- it also brings to bear the essential role that CAE plays in helping to maintain the safety of the global air transportation system. We're a pure-play aviation training company that's well defined as an innovation leader. Our airline customers face ever more complex challenges that will require new approaches and comprehensive solutions. We have the largest and broadest global trend network, coupled with market-leading simulation products and support. And as we look ahead, we expect to see more airline outsourcing opportunities materialize from the large pipeline of long-term training partnerships. With worldwide demand for approximately 300,000 new first officers forecast for the next decade, CAE is increasingly the partner of choice offering the industry's most comprehensive Cadet-to-Captain training solution, and we do this on a global scale. We're actively taking a leadership role to ensure that our industry has the qualified pilots it requires. With women accounting for only 5% of all commercial pilots, we've determined to draw in the full available talent pool. Among several other initiatives underway, the CAE Women In Flight scholarship program encourages women to become professional pilots. We recently announced the launch of a cadet pilot training program, where CAE will train more than 700 new professional pilots over the next 10 years for Southwest Airlines as part of their Destination 225 program. Our collaboration with Southwest is yet another great example of our commitment to source,…

Thank you. Operator, we're now ready to take questions from financial analysts and members of the financial community.

[Operator Instructions]. And our first question is from Kevin Chiang with CIBC.

Maybe just turning to Civil. I was wondering if we were to back out the Bombardier training acquisition, what have organic revenue growth, both on the operating income line and the revenue line, looked like? Or maybe conversely, what did BAT contribute to both those line items, both Civil revenue and Civil operating income, if you could share that?

Well, I think you should try then to maybe back out, which I assume is to back out benefits of the Bombardier Business Aircraft Training business. I want to start by saying that, that business is going very well and the integration, if anything, is going ahead of plan. I was quite happy with that. And I think when you look at the numbers, I think what it would tell you is that business is performing very well organically. The training business itself is going, as we expected, by double digits, top and bottom line. What you -- when you look at the results, I would ask you to bear in mind that in the quarter, we delivered a lot more -- less simulators in the quarter, mainly it's just because of the timing of the deliveries of customers. We delivered 5 in the quarter relative to 12 last year. And as you know, with the way we account for those, we only account for them at delivery. So I think going back to the question, organically, the business is performing very well.

Okay. That's helpful. Actually, do you have a sense? Is the idea to basically deliver a similar number of simulators for the full year '20 as fiscal 2019?

Yes.

Yes. Okay. And then a bit of a nitpicky question. But utilization was down about 4 points year-over-year. Just wondering what drove that. Was it a mix issue because you had folded in the Bombardier assets? Or was it -- is there something else that played there to drive that 4-point decline?

I think that the main issue that drives that is, first of all, I'd say that utilization is quite high. And what you're not seeing there, to your question, is because we deployed about -- from about 260 to 294 in the past year, with several of those deployed in the last 2 quarters. So what you're just basically seeing is just the ramp-up of sims that would just get put in. They're offering low, but the network itself is offering very, very high utilization.

Okay. That's great color. And maybe just more of a clarification point. I did not see it in your MD&A, so I apologize if it's there. Did you provide -- or did the impact of IFRS 16 have any material impact on the reported EBIT relative to the year-over-year comp? Was it -- I don't think I saw it in the MD&A.

So Kevin, I don't think, on the whole, it did not have a material impact on the SOI or EPS. It's a little bit of a headwind. But for the year, what we had said last quarter is that we'd have a bit of a headwind of that $0.01 to EPS for the year. Now in the comparison year-to-year, I think on the balance sheet, it's where you'd see the most impact with the increase on the right-of-use assets and the debt. But we've kind of -- we've given you the metrics adjusted for the IFRS 16 element on the balance sheet.

Our next question is from Cameron Doerksen with National Bank.

Just really two quick ones for me. Sonya, you mentioned or talked about the working capital investment in Q1. It does seem as though that it was sort of larger than what we would normally see in the Q1 significant working capital investment. Was there anything unusual in Q1 that would have driven that?

No. Nothing overly unusual. I mean we all would usually see a negative free cash flow investment in working cap in Q1, in fact, for H1. What we -- what I called out in the remarks was a higher level of work-in-progress simulators. So these are simulators that are going to production tech to clients. And given that we had lower deliveries this quarter, hence they didn't turn into revenue and of course, AR and cash flow. We expect those to be delivered over the next few quarters, so really just a question of timing.

Okay though. That's great. And just sort of secondly, just really like some modeling questions. Just maybe talk about the depreciation and run rate. With the number that we saw in Q1, is that actually a good run rate to use kind of on a quarterly basis for the full year?

I think, yes, it's quite indicative. Ultimately, you have 2 factors in there. You have the impact of IFRS 16 and the added depreciation because the assets are now on balance sheet and of course, the impact of the intangibles from the acquisitions from last year, mainly the Bombardier business jet training acquisition. So I think you can use that as a good run rate.

And our next question is from Konark Gupta with Scotiabank.

So on the Civil side, I just wanted to touch base on the margin side. Can you hear me okay, Andrew?

Yes, we hear you loudly. Just go ahead.

So on the Civil side, the margins are pretty strong. And I guess the Bombardier acquisition helped there. So I just wanted to understand, this is 21% in Q1 and it's already pretty strong. And seasonally, you always have second half much stronger. So what are your expectations around the Civil segment margin for the full year? Can we see something like 22%, 23%? Is that a possibility over time?

Well, I think that -- Hi, Konark. I think what you're seeing, again, in the Q1 in terms of the margin is the proportion that's coming from training, which is higher margin and profits. You'll remember, I was saying, when answering Kevin's question, that we only did deliver 5 simulators in the quarter versus 12 last year. So although it's good margins, and probably, it's not as good as service and training, so I think you're seeing a bit of that. And I think, for the full year, I think we continue to just guide to absolute operating income goals rather than margins, notwithstanding, I think margin will be good.

The only thing I would add to that is as we said when we introduced the Bombardier business jet training business is that, that would have the effect of about 100 to 150 basis points of margin accretion.

Okay. That's good. And I just want to clarify, was there any impact of Boeing's 737 Max in the Civil segment? Because, obviously, they're still grounded and airlines are not taking deliveries right now. So is there any reduction in training in Max and if there's an offset in training other aircraft types?

Not really. There's not much of an impact for us, positive or negative. I think, in the quarter, that materiality, I think we continue to deliver Max sims. I think we'll deliver, for this quarter, 8 or -- how much we think we'll deliver? Probably -- yes, we expect to deliver probably 8 737s in the next quarter. So we already delivered a bunch, so that's not falling down. You saw we sold 4 Max simulators in Q1, which is about what you would expect when you're considering the number of aircraft that have been sold on orders. So I don't really think really materially affecting our results one way or another right now.

Okay. That is good color. And then lastly, on Defence. So I think there was a note in the MD&A that you had some dilutive impact of fair value revaluation of share-based payments. So can you clarify what is that? And is that nonrecurring in nature, or can we expect something in the next quarter as well?

Well, it's not indicative of a continued run rate. There was a bit of a timing spike in the quarter because of the appreciation or the steep appreciation of the share -- in the long-term incentive plans, would get mark-to-market with the share price. So there was a bit of a steeper timing on those costs for the quarter.

Okay. That's great. And the European services programs continue to show weakness, I think, in the different side. Any thoughts there, Marc, why Europe, this year, is a particular program to see, or it's general market weakness?

Where do you see European market?

In the MD&A.

In the MD&A. Okay. Well, I think maybe we'll talk about timing on the orders. I think the whole situation that you see with regards and why we back up, what we said, we said that the year would be back end-loaded and we're seeing it. When you look at the -- what we've done this quarter on Defence, you have about 2/3 of our revenue in the quarter coming in from services, which is lower margins, and the programs going through were still in the early stages of the profitability ramp-up. And we just haven't been able to make the progress in the quarter on certain programs either because we weren't able to achieve the milestones that we needed to be able to book a good portion of revenue for a variety of reasons. I'll give you one. The aircraft program is not to reach their milestone, so we can't reach ours. So we don't have, a, the information we need, whatever. And a lot of times, all you need to do is to miss the end of the quarter. That's going to move to the next quarter. And some orders that we expected to get were delayed, and we're getting them later. So I think in terms of Europe itself, it's not a European phenomenon, it's timing. The only other thing I'd tell you is that in terms of backing up our optimism of why it's back end-loaded is that, of course, we know where the backlog is and we have a pretty good idea of when we'll be able to achieve the milestones in which we book revenue and earnings. And also, we need to -- we always need to win, continue to win orders in a year, particularly on products, because a portion will materialize in a year. We're pretty confident of that, about that, because the great majority, over 90%, are what we need to generate from orders that we don't have in our hands right now, we've already been selected. So it's not a question of whether we'll win or not, it's just the uncertainty of when exactly is the training -- is the contract that we sign. So we don't actually control all of that, but we've made some pretty fair assumptions that we feel confident about, that which gives us -- those 2 factors give us the confidence, having done an exhaustive detailed analysis, of course, of why we feel comfortable with the outlook that we've maintained.

And our next question is from Benoit Poirier with Desjardins Capital Markets.

Just to come back on the Defence margins. You seem quite confident that the revenue mix will be more favorable going through the second half. Could you maybe provide some color with respect to how much of the product revenues are already booked in the backlog right now or whether you need still to gain a lot of business to achieve this milestone?

I'll turn it over to -- I don't think we can give the amount of -- in absolute terms, but the confidence comes from when -- of just staying there. So the color now is that the amount of uncertainty we would have with regard to the products ordered that we need to get this here is what the confidence we get is because we're selected. We're already selected on over 90% of those orders. So we're going to get that business. So the only uncertainty that remains is when you're actually going to sign the contract. So I mean, we're not totally, obviously, in control of that, right, the customers, that can handle the customers as well as ourselves. But the assumptions we've made are based on very good intelligence because these things are near term. The other thing as well is that doesn't include the fact that the orders that we haven't been selected on but we have a very strong backlog of pipeline is, say, we got $4.2 billion of proposals that are out there that are awaiting decision. So some orders that potentially that will win, that would just add to the confidence that we have of beating the outlook that we have. So those are reasons where we're confident. And I'll tell you, Benoit, we saw this last year, and we saw this here before as well. And I think we're kind of at the same place, except that I would say that we're -- if I just sort of compare it to last year, we're picking up this earlier in the year, so I think it gives us even more time to materialize the outlook that we have.

And if I just -- and just to add to your question on how we make it up, this order intake, but -- we have a very detailed plan to make up the advancement on the product programs during the course of the year, but more weight on the second half. But -- and given the higher margins of these programs, the contribution is disproportionate and will make that long on the operating income and the margin.

Okay. That's great color. And related to the Boeing 737 Max there. There's a lot of discussion on whether there will be a requirement for additional training. So I was wondering if you could maybe provide some color about what would you expect in the next 12 to 24 months and how much 737 Max simulators do you have in your backlog right now.

Well, I think that, look, we'll have to wait and see what the regulators say when the airplane start coming back, when they're cleared for flying in the various jurisdictions. I mean we sold the great majority of the simulators that are out there. We certainly expect to continue to be successful like we have on the rest of our platforms. So I think it's wait and see. And clearly, there's going to be a lot of training to be done when the simulators -- when the aircraft are cleared. So I would see pent-up demand there when airlines start to fly. That I would expect, so -- but I have no color more than anybody else does on what the authorities will ultimately decide on what training is done on what simulator.

Okay. That's perfect. And on the civil aviation side, Marc, you mentioned that you expect more outsourcing of opportunities with the airlines. So are there any particular region where you expect to see to be more active? And in terms of simulators order, do you still feel confident that you can achieve 60-plus this year in terms of booking?

Benoit, it's Andrew. Actually, what we've said, as we've said in precious years, is that we'll maintain a leading share. I think what I would look to is aircraft deliveries which are still -- add a relatively high rate, x the temporary setback in Max deliveries, in that it relates certain level of sustained high level of demand for full-flight simulators. So what that will precisely be, I guess, will become clearer as the year progresses. But we see a pretty good run rate.

Okay. That's great. And on the Healthcare, we saw a nice pickup in revenues. Margin, negative, but I assume it's typical seasonality, so do you still feel confident that the double-digit growth can also be achieved on the operating income side?

Yes, absolutely. We're quite encouraged with the programs that our new leader, Rekha Ranganathan, is making with her team and the experience that she brings from her senior leadership -- or senior levels in Philips and other companies. So definitely, we're seeing the momentum there, and I would expect that to continue.

[Operator Instructions].

Operator, if there are no more questions from members of the financial community, we'll conclude this part of the session and open the lines for questions from members of the media.

There are no other questions on the phone lines from participants, sir.

Okay then. Well, I'll thank all participants for joining us this afternoon and remind you that a transcript of today's call will be made available on CAE's website at cae.com. Thank you.

And ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the call for today. We thank you for your participation. Everyone, have a great rest of your day. You may disconnect your line.