Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Cardinal Health Q4 2013 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Sally Curley, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you, Marcy. Thank you, everyone, and welcome to Cardinal Health's fourth quarter fiscal 2013 earnings conference call. Today, we will be making forward-looking statements. The matters addressed in the statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied. Please refer to the SEC filings and the forward-looking statements slide at the beginning of the presentation, which can be found on our Investor page of our website for a description of risks and uncertainties. In addition, we will reference the non-GAAP financial measures. Information about these measures is included at the end of the slides. I'd also like to remind you of a few upcoming investment conferences and events in which we will be webcasting, notably, the Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference in New York on September 9 and the 2013 Baird's Healthcare Conference in New York on September 10. In addition, we will be hosting an Investor Day on December 10. Details will be forthcoming by special invitation. For those who did not receive an invitation to attend in person, based on limited seating, we will be webcasting the event so that everyone has a chance to participate live. The details of these webcasted events are or will be posted on the IR section of our website at cardinalhealth.com, so please make sure to visit the site often for updated information. We look forward to seeing you at an upcoming events. Now I'd like to turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, George Barrett. George?

Thanks, Sally, and good morning. I think it's safe to say that this has been a full year for all of us at Cardinal Health, concluding with a strong fourth quarter. And for the year, we exceeded virtually all of our financial goals. Our non-GAAP operating earnings were up 10% to $2 billion. Our non-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $3.73, up a robust 16%. This included a favorable tax settlement of $0.18 per share in the third quarter. In addition, our organization did a great job of driving capital efficiency, generating $1.7 billion in cash from operations for the year. We returned over $800 million to shareholders in fiscal 2013 through both our differentiated dividend and share buybacks. We finished our fiscal 2013 with financial strength, scale, a strong customer and product portfolio and a deep bench of organizational talent, and we accelerated the strategic repositioning we began several years ago. Based on all of these dimensions and in a time of great change within the industry, it was an excellent year. Over the past few years, you've heard me say that healthcare is an incredibly exciting place to be. I feel the same today as we've closed out another fiscal year, but it's with a clearer sense of what is going to make it exciting. We are in the early stages of an unprecedented demographic wave, which is bringing nearly 10,000 people per day to eligibility age for Medicare. Even if we put aside the political implications surrounding that reality, the fact is that we have an aging population, many of whom suffer from at least one chronic illness and whose life expectancy has already increased by nearly 9 years in less than half a century as a result of medical innovation, and the needs…

Thanks, George, and good morning, everyone. This morning, I will review the drivers of fourth quarter and full year performance. Then I'll provide additional detail on our fiscal '14 guidance, including some of our key expectations and underlying assumptions. You can refer to the slide presentation posted on our website as a guide to this discussion. I'll start with consolidated results for the quarter. We reported an 8% increase in non-GAAP earnings per share in our fiscal 2013 fourth quarter versus the prior year's period. This was driven by a robust 11% non-GAAP operating earnings growth, partially offset by a higher tax rate and additional interest expense. Let me go through the rest of the income statement in a little more detail, starting with revenues. Consolidated revenues were down 5% to $25.4 billion, which was better than our expectations. The decline was due to the expiration of the Express Scripts contract at the beginning of Q2 of this fiscal year. Gross margin dollars increased 10%, with a rate up 66 basis points versus prior year. As a result of our strategic initiatives, including our efforts to drive favorable customer and product mix, we have successfully expanded our year-over-year gross margin rate every quarter for the past 3 years. SG&A expenses rose 9% in Q4, driven by recent acquisitions, which comprised 6.1 percentage points of this growth and investments in certain strategic priorities. Due to our continued focus on cost controls and efficiency of our operations, our core SG&A costs were essentially flat versus last year. Our consolidated non-GAAP operating margin rate increased 27 basis points to 1.86%. You will notice that our net interest and other expense came in higher in the fourth quarter than in prior quarters, primarily due to the new $1.3 billion of debt associated with the…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Robert Jones from Goldman Sachs.

It's actually Stephan calling in for Bob. Maybe you can touch on how your customer conversations have been? It's been a couple of months since losing WAG. Anything changed there, particularly with the independence?

Stephan, it's George. And as you know, we've been devoting a lot of energy over the last years to strengthening our position in the independent market. That continues to be an area of focus for us. Our conversations are very good. We devote most of our energy to what we can do to make them a more competitive and thrive in their marketplace, don't -- devote a lot of energy to that particular change. I would say right now, many of these customers are sort of wait-and-see mode to see what implications of various industry transactions mean. But we are really feeling good about our position with our independent customers, very committed to their growth and devote considerable energy to them.

Great. I guess, lastly on the share count. It's a bit higher than we were expecting for 2014 if you were to assume a normal course of buybacks. You did note a small amount of buybacks in the expectations. Any reason to think that they could be lower than a normal course, normal year from a course of buybacks?

Stephan, this is Jeff, thanks for that question. So we finished the end of Q4 with about 343-ish million shares outstanding on a diluted basis. And that reflects the $250 million of shares we bought back in Q4, which was really a pull ahead of some of the shares that we expected to buy back in '14. As I said, we expect the average rate over the course of '14 to be about that same 343 million, which really means that the additional repo that we'll do in '14 will largely be allocated towards offsetting any dilution from the issuance of shares over the course of the year. And that's what's reflected in our guidance. That all said, as I said in my prepared remarks, we have a strong balance sheet. We're going to continue to generate good cash in fiscal '14. And as opportunities permit, based on our cash balances, based on the attractiveness of other strategic opportunities, there's nothing to say that we wouldn't pursue additional repo over the year, and I would view that as an upside.

Our next question is from Steven Valiquette from UBS.

So a couple of quick questions here. First, you mentioned you expect continued softness in nuclear in fiscal '14. But I think, for us, we're just trying to figure out is there any sort of ballpark approximation of the EPS impact year-over-year of the softness in that unit. Are we talking about just like a $0.05 of EPS or something greater than that? Just trying to frame how much that hurts you year-over-year. And that's obviously excluding the impairment charge when thinking about that?

Yes, thanks for the question, Steve. As we said, we have seen a continued decline in the nuclear business to an extent greater than what we had been expecting perhaps earlier in the year. And at this point, our forecast assumes that decline to continue, both in terms of the overall market demand and some of the pricing impacts we're seeing related to that. It is a negative impact next year, again, versus FY '13. I think quantifying it in the $0.05 range is probably a reasonable approximation at this point. And that's probably -- that's net of some of the cost-reduction actions that we've taken to attempt to offset some of the impact, but it doesn't totally offset it. So I think your approximation is reasonable.

Okay. And then just a quick big-picture question for George, since this topic came up on a few of your competitor calls. Just curious on any thoughts you have, big picture, around your appetite for global generic procurement collaborations? It seems to be coming up on the press, et cetera. I'm just curious to get your big-picture thoughts and anything you could say about that.

Lots in the press. As I said, we really -- we like our positioning. Our generics business is very strong, has great scale. We're growing. We are already very globalized in our procurement systems and the way we work. I guess what I'd say, we never dismiss any opportunity to continue to improve our business. But as I said, we're in a good position right now. We'll continue to compete aggressively and effectively, and always keep our minds open to ways to improve our business. But nothing I can say more than that.

Our next question is from Ross Muken from ISI Group.

So obviously, George, you talked about on the call, it's been an eventful year. You've had some time to reflect post sort of the WAG loss and obviously, you've been sort of dealing with Express for some time, and now we've had AssuraMed on board for over a quarter. So as you think about sort of what's transpired in the business, you sounded pretty resilient on your remarks. And I'm curious, just in general, where are you most focused in terms of where you want to drive this business? What are your kind of key takeaways from what you've learned as CEO from all this sort of trials and tribulations the last 12, 18 months? And how do you sort of wrap that all together in terms of the forward plan?

Yes. Thanks, Ross, how much time do we have? It's a great question. And I'll try to give a concise answer as much as I can, because there's a lot in there. Let's start with -- it's been a hell of a year, obviously, and I would say a really great year. But putting it all into context, which is, I think, what you've asked me to do here, I think if we go back even just 3, 4 years ago, I think it would've been hard for us to imagine that we could have done enough repositioning to be able to absorb the ending of a major contract like Walgreens. Our organization has done a fantastic job and really disciplined work to add strength and balance to our business and to our portfolio. We've had consistent growth, even with some turbulence around the system like what we've experienced this year in nuclear imaging, and honestly, I think we're forecasting a pretty strong fiscal 2014 while absorbing that nonrenewal. So in context, I feel really good about -- we are stronger, better balanced, better equipped from a talent perspective and better positioned, given some of the changes in healthcare. And some of which I described in my prepared remarks, we know that, that care is going to be changing. We know that some of the payment systems are going to reform. We know that there's going to have to be both innovation and competitive alternative products. And so I'm really proud of both our group and the work that's been done over the past years to sort of reposition us for growth. I think we know what we want to do. We're going to have to continue, as Jeff described earlier, to be really flexible and nimble and quick because the world is changing rapidly in healthcare. But I hope that gives you a little perspective.

Our next question is from Glen Santangelo from Crédit Suisse.

This is actually Jeff Bailin in for Glen. If we could just talk for a moment on the Medical segment about the Medical Business Transformation, we haven't talked about that in a little while. Can you guys comment on if you're realizing some of the hoped-for benefits and maybe how the underlying legacy Cardinal Medical segment performed in the quarter?

Why I don't just -- why don't I start, Jeff, in answering that a little bit in sort of generally on the business transformation, and then I'm going to turn it to Jeff, who can probably walk through a little more of the detail. But let me start with this. I would just say the medical system is now fully integrated into our Medical business, which is great, and we'll continue to drive the effectiveness of this program in helping us serve our customers. We had -- got us a little bit of a slow start in the year with some change management issues. But as we worked our way through the year, I think we finish with most of our metrics, particularly the important one of service levels, exceeding our pre-transformation, pre-implementation levels. So from that standpoint, we're where we need to be. Jeff, if you want to add to that at all?

Yes. For the quarter, the Medical Business Transformation was a net add to the profitability of the Medical segment. For the full year, it was essentially a wash. As George mentioned, we started off the year with some negative impact from it, really as we were cleaning up the remaining change management issues and getting the system fine-tuned. As we've gotten to the second half of the year, we've been focused on finishing up any remaining cleanup items, but really, more importantly, driving the benefits of the system not only in terms of some of the costs in inventory benefits that were expected early on as a result of the implementation, but much more importantly, by driving the use of the system through our sales teams, through our operating teams so that we can drive the longer-term strategic benefits with our customers, which is really why the system was meant to begin with. And we're beginning to see some of those benefits in the way that we can sell our preferred products, for example, to customers. Those benefits will continue to materialize in FY '14 and beyond. And at this point, we feel very good about the positioning of the system in terms of our ability to use it to drive those benefits. With regards to your second question about underlying performance of the medical business, if you strip out the AssuraMed benefit, I would say it was sort of a mixed story. Very happy to see increased contribution from the preferred products priority, which will continue to be a very, very key strategic initiative for us this year and beyond. Offsetting that was the continued procedural softness that both the George and I referenced. That's sort of become a reality, at least for the near term, that we're dealing with. And we feel we have lots of tools to deal with that and continue to grow earnings in a flat utilization environment. But then I also mentioned, this is more of a sort of technical accounting issue, but as we trued-up our incentive comp for the year, which is largely driven by consolidated performance, particularly as it relates to our 401(k) contribution, those true-ups got pushed down to the Medical segment, and that tended to have a dampening impact on segment profit as well. But all things considered, actually, we feel pretty well about how Medical ended the year and how they're positioned heading into FY '14.

Our next question is from Ricky Goldwasser from Morgan Stanley.

George and Jeff, when you think about nuclear, does, strategically, it makes sense to continue to have it in your portfolio, given just the grimmer reimbursement outlook and the declining profitability?

So Ricky, I'll start and then if Jeff wants to, he can jump in on the financial side. We are still serving a great number of important customers. And so as you think about the basket of services that we might, for example, provide a large integrated academic medical center, our ability to support them is multifactorial. So we have many dimensions of how we serve them. And so I think, for us, this is an area where we continue to serve, and it's still a contributor to our business. I don't know if you want to add anything to that, Jeff?

Yes. First of all, Ricky, I'd say this is sort of margin-accretive business to the overall consolidated results. We continue to believe that there are scenarios in the future where, particularly in the PET technology space, there are opportunities for the cash flow forecast to improve from our current scenario. And I'll also say, like all parts of our businesses -- and this isn't unique to nuclear or anything else in our portfolio. We continually assess the value-add from keeping the business in our portfolio versus other arrangements. And at this point, we believe keeping it in the portfolio is best for the company and shareholders.

Okay. And then I think in the prepared remarks, you said that AssuraMed in the quarter was -- came in ahead from your initial expectation. So when you think about the fiscal year '14 guidance, do you assume higher accretion from AssuraMed than what you've kind of like communicated earlier on?

Yes. So we -- at the time that we announced the deal, we said that we expected AssuraMed to be at least $0.18 accretive in FY '14, net of financing costs. As we gone through our budgeting process and had 4 months now of actual results, we are very confident that the accretion impact in FY '14 will be at or above that $0.18.

Our next question is from Tom Gallucci from Lazard Capital.

Jeff, 2 questions on the numbers, if I could. First, you mentioned the incentive comp and I was just trying to get an understanding of sort of the underlying growth within the medical-surgical segment, it was -- can you quantify that incentive number that had dropped down into that area?

Yes, it was close to about $10 million of negative year-on-year impact from the incremental incentive comp.

Okay. And then obviously lots of moving parts to next year. You sort of gave us your big-picture views. Would you care to, I guess, do 1 of 2 things: With respect to the drug segment, lots -- even more moving parts, can you give us any idea of what sort of margin ranges maybe you're expecting there? Or with the ramp down of Walgreens, and then I assume some cost-cutting in relation to that, how should we think about maybe the cadence of the quarters in the drug segment versus what maybe we've seen historically?

Sure. Well, let me handle those in reverse order, if I could, Tom. First of all, keep in mind that we still have Walgreens for the first 2 months of fiscal '14. So obviously, 2/3 of Q1 has the benefit of continuing to support Walgreens. So I mean, that gives you a bit of an idea of quarterly cadence. Beyond that, I wouldn't get too specific. With regards to margin expansion, I mean, this is clearly focus #1, 2 and 3 for us as we go through '14, and it has been for the past 3 years, to make sure that we have the strategic portfolio and the operating focus on both the products, customers and the internal part of the business to ensure that we're driving margin expansion. We've had great success there for the past 3-plus years. I expect us to continue to drive that in FY '14 and beyond. I don't want to get too specific about the segment profit margins, but I think almost implicit in the guidance that we've given is a continued margin expansion overall for the company in FY '14.

Our next question is from John Kreger from William Blair.

It's Robbie Fatta in for John today. If I could stick with AssuraMed, can you give us any updated thoughts on the competitive bidding front and how you think that might impact results in fiscal '14 and beyond?

Yes, it's George. We've sort of built this in, as you know, when we announced the acquisition. We did talk about the dynamics from a competitive bidding and that we had made some assumptions associated with that. We feel pretty good about those assumptions. One of the things that we might see around the market, and we are seeing some signs, if you look at some of the customer base in the DME area, I think we might see somewhat of a shakeup there and some consolidation among those customers who are doing DME. And I think that's, to some extent, attributable to competitive bidding and the dynamics around the market. But I think we had done a fairly good job of anticipating this, and feel good about how we're beginning 2014.

Great, that's helpful. And then maybe longer term, it certainly sounds like the medical business is becoming a much more important part of the mix. As you look maybe 3 years out, how big of a percentage of operating income would you envision the Medical segment contributing?

Robbie, I don't think at this point we're comfortable giving a 3-year forecast on segment distribution at this point. I think it's safe to say we really feel good about both of our segments. We'll continue to invest in both of them. I think the medical area around healthcare is, obviously, in our national spend, obviously, a much bigger component. And while that presents some challenges, it also means there's more opportunities in some ways, because there's just such enormous activity in that area. So we're trying to stay very thoughtful about those changes, make sure our portfolio is diversified so that we can take a punch if one component of the portfolio is getting affected. And so we feel good about it. But I do not want to diminish, in any way, our commitment to our pharmaceutical work. It is a huge part of what we do. We do it extremely well. We've got a great team that we're building with the increasing know-how, particularly around clinical activity in the pharmaceutical side.

Our last question is from Lisa Gill from JPMorgan. Lisa C. Gill - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: George, I had a couple of questions around generics. My first question would be that, clearly, in the quarter, you call out generics as being better than expected, although there were less new generics in the market. Can you talk about penetration within your customer base and where you are today and where you see it going? And then also, along those lines, have you changed your contracting at all with manufacturers that are driving this increase in profit? And should we expect that to continue into '14?

So there are couple of questions sort of built into that. It has been a strong period for us in generics. And you're correct, it hasn't necessarily been all about new launches. We have to be able to thrive in an environment where those come and go. I think we have continued to grow our general penetration, but I'd say at this point, it's pretty stable. We are at a very competitive position to anybody in the market. We will continue to try to inch that up. Some of it is also about penetration in the overall system. But I would say, from the standpoint of how we deal with each of our customers, we've probably done a good job over the last 3 years of really getting to a market-leading competitive positioning, and feel good about that and feel good about that going forward. More on generics, I would say, as you know, the environment in pricing tends to be, in the overall when you aggregate it, it tends to be affected by 1 or 2 big product sets, inflate or deflate, and that's certainly still true. But I would say in the overall mix of products, as we look at the broad basket of several thousand products, that environment is sort of as it was last time we spoke, which is a pretty good environment for us. And so I think that's probably a little bit of characterization on the pricing side. But as it relates to our work with manufacturers, we're trying to be very strategic about it, very thoughtful about not just where our customers are going and what they need in this marketplace, but also where the generic manufacturers are going and what they face, whether they're vertically integrated, nonvertically integrated, what's strategically relevant to them. So we try to build our strategy with each of them or around the things that we understand about their businesses. And we've tried to take a very thoughtful strategic approach to thinking about the upstream and how we work with our partners. Lisa C. Gill - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: And then George, I guess my second question would just be that people are all focused around this generic global purchasing. But my question has to do with really thinking about drug distribution globally. Clearly, China was up 45% this year. You've done really well in China. How do you think about the global market and are there other areas that you think are similar to China, and you think Cardinal will go in that direction internationally in the next few years? How should we think about that?

Yes, look, it's a fair question. Obviously, China's been a high priority for us, and I think we've done a really good job there. But it's hard, it's really hard to look at that as a global distribution market. I would say it's a global procurement market in many ways, but global distribution is a sort of different notion. Markets have very distinct characteristics. Some are very mature and completely saturated, some are government-controlled in terms of pricing, some are still in their early nascent period of -- and growing, but with financing dynamics. So we will be very disciplined. Thankfully, we've got a team with good knowledge of the global pharmaceutical and medical device world, and we're going to be very disciplined about how we look at international opportunities. If one had the characteristics of a market like China, of course, it will have some attraction to it. But there are others that we've looked at and see and just do not seem attractive and would not serve our shareholders as well.

I would now like to turn the call over to George Barrett for closing comments.

Well, listen, I just want to thank everyone for joining us on the call. As I said, it's been an exciting year. We feel good about where we are. We look forward to seeing many of you in the coming weeks. I think we will. And with that, we'll sign off. Thanks, everyone.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's conference. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.