On the revenue side, Paul, a couple of observations. From a revenue standpoint, we continue to work with our customers. As you know, we have a direct engagement model. There’s – we obviously have great attendance at connections and thanks by the way to all of our customers for coming out connections. We have some 1,500 customers there. And by the way, in addition to just being glad, I think to get out of the house as far as they were very high and again, a lot of us three to four between us and our customers and that planning helps us lay out what we’re after from a revenue standpoint, which is frankly, to make sure that they are meeting their subscriber demand. And right now, we know that they’re meeting their subscriber demand and that’s what we’re focused on. So from a revenue impact, I mean, I guess, we could ship more to their warehouses, but right now, we know that we’re meeting their subscriber demand. As for the factors, look, I think the world of the team, and I think you’ve seen the discipline of not only the culture and the team here on our execution, our processes on our execution. But as we’ve spoken about before, the platforms have allowed us because of their fully abstracted model to narrow and focus our skew count. And our teams are working and managing some 300 skews or thereabouts, where six years ago, well when Michael right, we had some 3,200 skews. So there’s been a lot of work to drive our platforms, not only through our customers, but take advantage of the benefits in the company. And so we have a very talented supply chain team with a strong balance sheet, frankly, focused on 300 skews. So I think that’s the biggest difference to that question. Does that help?