Good morning. My name is Kim, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to The Chemours Company Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Alisha Bellezza, Treasurer and Director of Investor Relations for The Chemours Company, you may begin your conference.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to The Chemours Company fourth quarter and full-year 2017 earnings conference call. I’m joined today by Mark Vergnano, President and Chief Executive Officer, who will begin the call with the discussion of highlights; and Mark Newman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who will review our financial performance and liquidity positions. Mark Vergnano will then review our quarterly business results and conclude the call with our outlook. Before we begin, let me remind you that comments on this call as well as the supplemental information provided in our presentation and on our website contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including those described in the documents Chemours has filed with the SEC. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events that may not be realized. Actual results may differ and Chemours undertakes no duty to update any forward-looking statements as a result of future developments or new information. During the course of this call, management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors evaluating the company’s performance. A reconciliation of non-GAAP terms and adjustments are included in our release and at the end of this presentation. I’ll now turn the call over to Mark Vergnano.

Thanks, Alisha. 2017 proved to be the year that we solidified our foundation, as we successfully completed our 5-point transformation plan. Our team’s commitment and entrepreneurial spirit since then are clearly evident in our fourth quarter and full-year results. We are now ready bolstered by our drive to advance higher-value chemistry to begin the next chapter of Chemours. As we will discuss in detail, we reported significant year-over-year improvements in all key metrics for both the quarter and the full-year. These improvements were the result of strong Ti-Pure titanium dioxide price improvement, higher demand for Ti-Pure pigments, significant adoption of Opteon refrigerants, higher base refrigerant, solid fluoropolymer volume growth, improved pricing certain fluoropolymer products and increased profitability within Chemical Solutions. In summary, we met higher demand for our customers with a disciplined focus on cost management to drive higher earnings and cash flow. Not only were our businesses firing on all cylinders, we also hit the ground running with our new capital allocation strategy, following our Investor Day in December. We repurchased approximately $150 million of shares through January 31, or about one-third of our $500 million authorization. As you know, tax reform legislation passed in the U.S. since we announced our 2018 outlook at Investor Day. As a result, we have updated our adjusted EPS and free cash flow outlook to reflect our current understanding of the favorable impact of this tax reform. I’ll now turn the call over to Mark Newman.

Thanks, Mark. 2017 proved to be a great finale to our transformation plan. Sales were up almost $800 million, while adjusted EBITDA was up $600 million over 2016. When I think about our earnings in our first year as a standalone company, 2017 adjusted EBITDA was 2.5 times that of 2015. Perhaps more importantly, our 2017 performance along with a favorable impact of tax reform puts us in a great spot to meet or exceed our long-term adjusted EPS and cumulative free cash flow target that we shared during our recent Investor Day. Today, I will cover a quick overview of our segments on an annual basis, followed by our annual financial summary, and then move to our quarterly financial review followed by our liquidity position and then provide an overview of the impact of U.S. tax reform. Let me start with a high-level summary of our three businesses on a full-year basis. Fluoroproducts sales increased 17%, largely driven by the transition to Opteon refrigerants and higher fluoropolymer demand. In fact, sales of Opteon refrigerants rose over 70% on a full-year basis in comparison to 2016. Adjusted EBITDA increased 50% to nearly $670 million, while related margins expanded 500 basis points to approximately 25%. 2017 Chemical Solutions revenue was $571 million versus $772 million in 2016, a result of the impact of portfolio changes. However, despite lower year-over-year sales, adjusted EBITDA increased 46% to nearly $60 million. As a result, adjusted EBITDA margins doubled to approximately 10%, a testament to the untapped profitability unlocked through our transformation plan initiatives. Titanium Technologies sales now stand at nearly $3 billion, up 25% over 2016, reflecting higher global average prices and solid demand for our Ti-Pure offerings. Adjusted EBITDA improved 85% to over $860 million, with margins expanding 900 basis points to approximately…

Thanks, Mark. I’ll begin with a review of our Fluoroproducts segment. We generated $656 million in sales in the quarter, a 15% year-over-year improvement, driven by a strong broad-based demand across the segment. Adjusted EBITDA rose 43% to nearly $160 million, reflecting robust demand and improved prices. This translated into an adjusted EBITDA margin of 24%, a 400 basis point increase versus last year’s fourth quarter. The global transition Opteon refrigerants is continuing to be a primary driver in this segment, as the refrigerant market moves toward low global warming potential operating ahead of regulatory phase downs. Opteon delivered strong year-over-year demand despite a tough comparison, driven by last year’s mobile ramp up in the EU ahead of the January 1, 2017 mobile directive deadline. This quarter’s volume increase was a result of Opteon stationary blends demand in Europe ahead of 2018 quota reductions for base refrigerants. As a reminder, the EU quotas were reduced by 37% in 2018. We see this as just the beginning of the global technology shift for stationary applications and the next wave of growth in the Opteon story. As stationary markets adopt this low global warming potential technology, we now expect approximately 20,000 supermarkets will be using HFO blends by 2020, and expect over 50,000 supermarkets and other commercial refrigeration installations by 2025. Opteon mobile refrigerant adoption in the U.S. also contributed to this quarter’s volume increases. We expect Opteon conversion in the U.S. to continue incentivized by cafe carbon credits. We mentioned at Investor Day that we estimate approximately 70% of the U.S. mobile market will convert to low GWP technology by the end of this year, with full conversion anticipated by 2022. Our base refrigerant business also had a great quarter, a result of our team’s ability to maximize profitability and meet…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Duffy Fischer from Barclays. Your line is open.

Yes. Good morning. First question just around the pace of buybacks, Obviously, $150 million significantly faster than the timeline given when the $500 million was announced. Should we think about that as kind of the right run rate, or was there something lumpy about that or that will slowdown now the rest of the year?

Yes, Duffy, we obviously got the authorization of $500 million from the Board, and we sort of jumped on that, because based on where the stock price was. So we had the cash flow. We saw the stock price where it was under 50 and we thought it was a good opportunity for us to get started on that. And we’re going to be opportunistic as we’re going forward and just take advantage of when we have the cash and when we think there’s value in the market to do it.

Okay. And then over the last couple of weeks, it’s been a negative – a couple of negative press releases out, one from North Carolina couple of days ago, where they made the claim that they don’t think you’re living up to what you guys said you would do around the North Carolina plant in GenX, and then the Ohio Attorney General is kind of suing you guys, it seems like kind of a similar thing to the West Virginia plant. Can you just walk us through what the mile markers are going to be on both of those issues for this year, and kind of what we should expect to see?

Yes. So one, we’re aware of everything you’ve just mentioned and obviously on the recent DQ piece, we will comply. On the Ohio issue, that’s a pending litigation, which as you know, we don’t comment on. But let me just maybe sort of put this in a little bit of context, and I just want to be clear that the company is really taking all these issues very seriously. We hear the community and concerns in North Carolina and we are absolutely committed to working closely with all the authorities to respond to those. We’re cooperating with federal, state and local inquiries as they come in to us. We’re working very hard and sharing data with the regulators of both states and federal and local inquiries that, that occur, and we’re really trying to find a solution that addresses all the full scope of the issues. We’ve devoted a lot of resources to develop both the interim and also the long-term solutions. But I really want to be clear that, we continue to believe that none of the discharges either before we became an independent company in mid-2015 or after have adversely impacted anyone’s health. But notwithstanding that, we’re committed to our operations in North Carolina and the presence in the community and the state. And we take seriously our dialogue and relationships with both the local and the state authorities and the people residing in the communities, along with the hundreds of employees, vendors and their family members. So as we said in Investor Day, we’ve been intentionally quiet in the media on this whole issue really out of the respect for the process of finding a long-term solution with the regulators and we absolutely anticipate that as the solutions get developed and we think they will with the state and the local authorities, you know we’ll be more vocal about that, but until then we are hunkering in to work with the authorities to get these completed.

Great, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of P.J. Juvekar from Citi. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning Mark, this is Eric Petrie on for P.J.

Hey Eric.

In TiO2, I just wanted to ask what kind of end market customers or regions are you seeing the most interest in joining the long-term TiO2 agreements?

You know I’d say Eric we’ve been very happy with the work we’ve been doing with our customers on this, I’d say it’s global and I would say it’s across all the segments. Very good progress so far, I’ve been very happy with what we’ve been doing on those contracts and how the team has been implementing those. I would say my guess is by the end of the year over half of our revenue will probably be within these types of new contracts. And I think, again I think they’re good for us, but I also think they are good for our customers. So I think good progress being made and I anticipate more progress before year-end.

And as a follow-up, we’ve heard fluoroproducts cost has been increasing, just wanted to know how that’s impacting your pricing discussions for both HFO, Opteon, as well as your base refrigerant business?

Yeah, Eric for us we have multiple fluoroproducts contracts and multiple suppliers, our cost base is not really increasing. I’d say we’re flat with cost and we see that flatness occurring over the next several years, so I think we’re in good shape from that. We’ve heard that from others, but it’s not affecting us.

Helpful, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Laurence Alexander from Jefferies. Your line is open.

Hi, this is Jeff Schnell on for Laurence. On TiO2 you mentioned pricing actions are taking to account raw material impacts, can you talk about what you are seeing on the input side of the equation, what level of feedstock inflation you are expecting for 2018? And if you fully flex your asset base how can we think about the leverage you have using sulfate versus rutile?

Yes. So I think, you mean, ilmenite versus rutile. But I’d say that as we look across 2018, we don’t see a whole lot of raw material impact to us for the full year, you know as 2019 plays out, we’ll see how that happens, but in 2018 I think we’re in good shape from a cost perspective. What we’ve said in terms of flexing assets and we talked about in Investor Day, over the next several years we’re going to add about 10% of capacity to our circuit, we believe that that is – think of that almost as another new line over that time period, that’s going to be the biggest opportunity we have to bring more volume in the marketplace.

And just quickly as a follow-up, from your discussions with customers, can you talk about what you’re seeing on the inventory side, our inventory levels higher or lower than you would have expected given the environment we’re in?

No, I’d say inventories are pretty normalized across based on what we see in our conversations with customers, so it doesn’t appear that there’s anything out of the norm, in fact I would say that if there was a little spike it’s gotten back to normal levels.

Right, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Bob Koort from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Thank you, good morning. Mark, can you talk about these longer term contracts in TiO2 and how much of a haircut you’re willing to sacrifice in order to get those extended contracts I would think in this environment, maybe your customers would think TiO2 prices are above normal cyclical averages, so just give us some insight on how that discussion is going with your customer base?

Yeah, first of all, I don’t – I wouldn’t say there is any haircut going on Bob. I’d say that we are having really good conversations with our customers. You know we are not going to share all the details about these contracts, but what I would say is that, they’re very positive conversations, you know both sides – trust is being built on both sides here, because you know each – both our customers not have decided where to take risks. So, I would say we’re walking before we’re running, but we are sort of skipping the crawl stage, so we are jumping into some of these contracts in a very good way. And again, I think that they are going to show solid growth for us going forward and at the same time give some really good clarity to our customers in terms of the value proposition for them as well. So, I think this is a win-win on both sides.

And how do you think about immunizing the risk to you from maybe securing more certainty on the pricing side, but still having the risk on the ore side that you could get caught when there’s inflationary periods there?

Yeah, that’s really our job on the contract basis on both sides of that, right, so from that standpoint, that’s why we don’t feel we have that risk in 2018, and as we build our agreements both on the supply side and on our customer side, we will build that in so that that is not a high risk for us going forward.

Great, thanks very much.

Yeah.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Zekauskas from JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Thanks very much. Right now in terms of the HFO market, there is Chemours and there’s Honeywell. In what year do you think that there will be a third competitor in that market?

You know I don’t know Jeff, I would say that you know when we talked and, I know you were at Investor Day with us, when we talked at Investor Day Paul really laid out all the levels of defense if you will around our IP as well as other things that we have in place it’s sort of a multiple shell, so it’s hard for us to get – you know in our assumptions we do believe at some point in time we think there will be other entrants, but it’s hard for us to gauge where. I will say that you know – and this quarter really proved it out, the fact that we have both base refrigerants and HFOs really playing well to us because as you see these directives changing in Europe and you see these quotas drop, people have choices about maintaining the current equipment at higher price base refrigerant or moving over to HFOs with new equipment and we can play that with them in the best way possible. So, we’re a good solutions source for our customers because it’s both profitable for us on both ends, but it gives them choices, so the fact that we have both available to our customers, I think is a distinct advantage for us. In time, you’re right, there will be probably other entrants, but it’s not clear to us when that’ll be, because I think we have a lot of lines of defense here.

Okay, and so in terms of Opteon growth, whether Opteon grows 10% annually or 20% annually, given the capacity that you have now relative to the capacity that you’re going to bring on, your utilization rate at the new capacity seems like it will be relatively low for a long period of time. So, can you explain how that’s good for shareholders or in what way that expansion is value enhancing given that it seems you’ll be at a low utilization rate for a while?

Yeah, so remember when we bring on our new Corpus Christi facility which will be done at the end of this year, it’s by far a much lower cost facility. So we will move our capacity to that facility very, very quickly as we bring it on board, which means we will base load that, the base load on that will be very fast. And then as we ramp up with our customer base, which will happen each year, I think we’ll get to good utilization rates fairly quickly. So, the way we look at it is, the base load of that facility will come almost immediately, and I think we’ll have good returns on that asset quickly and then that just builds over time. So, I’m not – I don’t think that we’re going to be out of whack in terms of supply and demand from that standpoint and I think then we can turn on the other facility on or off as we see fit based on where we are, but we will base load that new facility very quickly.

Okay, great, thank you so much.

Your next question comes from the line of Don Carson from Susquehanna. Your line is open.

Good morning, this is Emily Wagner on for Don. You guys mentioned earlier that your raw material impact won’t change for the full-year in that TiO2. But what’s your expected 2018 production relative to 2017? And do you see a change in your ore mix on a year-over-year basis?

I’d say very, very minimal change, Emily. I mean, the – we have to stage our ores well in advance of our facility. So we think about this very thoughtfully, obviously. So from that standpoint, I don’t think, our ore blend mix will be dramatically different year-on-year, maybe slightly but not dramatically.

Okay. And then in terms of general market, not specifically, but in terms of the – or cost inflation relative to the expected price increase for TiO2, what do you think the differences between that for the full-year in the industry?

I don’t know if I have a good sense of that. I think, it’s – we’re seeing significant ore cost increases. I can’t really tell you about the rest of the industry primarily, because we use so much ilmenite and it’s – we’re unique in that. So our blend is very different. So I’m not sure I have a good answer for you about the whole market.

Okay. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of John Roberts from UBS. Your line is open.

Thank you. The capacity in China is hard to track. Of the Chinese capacity that’s currently not operating, do you expect any seasonal restart after the winter? And then longer-term, do you have any guess about how much of that capacity might get invested – investment that it needs to be able to operate in compliance with the new regulations longer-term?

Yes, John, it’s a good question. Mark Newman and I were in China two weeks ago. We spent a lot of time with our customers, not just on the TiO2 side, but on the floral side as well, where this is impacting them or they impacting the markets that they are in. what was more evident to me on this trip than it have been in the past was, there seems to be more facilities being shutdown and not restarted than I had anticipated. And that just to be very blend, that was a little bit of a surprise to me, because we thought these were temporary shutdowns in some cases that either seasonally or after regulations were met, we’ll come back on stream. And our customers were telling us that a lot of these will not come back on stream. So this is something we’re staying close to and looking at and making sure that our supply plans to our customer incorporate that as well. So I think it’s something that we’re going to all keep our eye on going forward, not just on the TiO2 side, but on the floral side as well. And to us, that’s something we are working very closely with our customers to make sure we can give them the products that they need.

John, do you have a follow-up?

No, thank you.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Roger Spitz from Bank of America. Your line is open.

Thanks very much and good morning. Wanted to ask when you, I think, in industry, TiO2 pigment prices peaked this year later half this year, or any comment you’d like to make on that?

Yes. What we’ve said and I think the way we’re working with our customers, we see gradual price increases ongoing. And again, we’re – we just finished our – the work that we’ve talked about before with implementing first quarter price increases. After this, we see low to mid single-digit price increases for the rest of the year. But we see that continuing in a gradual way, and I think that’s part of our whole plan around value stabilization.

Got it. And regarding those new TiO2 contracts, I guess, I’m making this assumption, but I would assume that they would not have a meet and release – meet or release clause in them?

Yes. So, I’m not going to go into detail about any of the contracts and not trying to be cute. But as we work with each customer, these are proprietary contracts with our customers. And so we really want to keep that private for them. And at the same time, I think, these are huge source of competitive advantage for ourselves as well. So as we’re contracting with our customers, I think, as I mentioned before, I think, this is good value for us, and I think it’s good value for our customers and it’s really a relationship between us.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Chris Perrella from Bloomberg Intelligence. Your line is open.

Good morning. A question on fluoropolymers. With the Opteon capacity coming online and the base loading of the plant, do you see a step up in margin from a lower-cost production, and is that more of a 2019 than a 4Q results impact on margin there?

Yes. Yes to both. So you’re right. The plant comes up stream at the end of this year, really the impact is 2019, we should have a lower-cost of manufacturing because of that. So we should have a positive margin impact at that point.

Okay. And then the capital spending with Mexico and Corpus Christi pretty much done at the end of 2018. What’s the maintenance CapEx for this year? And then how should I think about 2019, the capital you need to put in the TiO2 and maybe the step down in CapEx next year?

Yes. I think, what we’ve – this is Mark Newman. What we’ve said historically is that, our run and maintain CapEx is somewhere between $2250 million. So, without growth CapEx, it’s what you would expect. I think what we’ve identified though is, based on our investable portfolio that we have today, we think we can continue to find new opportunities to reinvest in this platform. I think what we’ve guided to historically is that, while CapEx in 2019 or in 2018 will $475 million and $500 in the quarter that we would expect it to glide down to be at a lower-level than that, obviously would run and maintain being somewhere between $200 million and $250 million.

Yes, I would just add to Mark’s comments, and we’ve said this all along that with the normal growth ideas that come in, that 350 seem to be an area that we had been landing at. But we continue to find good opportunities to invest in these businesses and we will do that. We will – at the kind of ROIC numbers, you see us generate. We will put our capital to work if we see a good project. So and we’ll be very transparent about that when we do it with everyone. But I just want to make clear that, if there’s good projects out there that we think are value adding, that fit into the returns that we want for this company, we’re not going to be shy about making those.

And the 350 and 400 give or take that would include the TiO2 debottlenecking over the next couple of years?

Yes, correct.

Yes.

Okay. All right. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Bob Koort from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, guys. This is Chris Evans on for Bob. Just looking at your valuation, I was just wondering if you would be willing or able to act on a strategic separations of your two segments to may be better reflect or enhance the specialty portion, which I think you showed today is still a strong grower. But do you – is there any ability as you’ve completed your transformation plan to separate those two entities out?

Chris, I don’t think that’s top of mind for us right now. I think we have a tremendously profitable and undervalued TiO2 franchise that generates just a boatload of cash, as you could see, at very high margins. We – with the value stabilization strategy that we’re putting in place, we think that is going to be a lot more stable versus cyclical of the past. So I think that right off the bat that is an undervalued piece of our company. And I would say, the multiples associated with that are – should be higher to be very blunt about it. You’re right on if you look at the other side of the house both floral side and the pieces of Mining Solutions, I think are higher multiple type businesses. But when we look at the businesses together, we think we have a portfolio that makes sense to us, at least, at this point in time and can generate tremendous value for our shareholders.

Thanks. And just looking at your balance sheet, you mentioned the cash generation of your business, $1.6 billion at the end of the year with a strong guide for next year. Strategically, how do you look at that cash? Obviously, we see that the repurchase power that you guys have and I think the share count that you’ve guided towards for 2018 at $188 million implies that maybe your authorization is a little light. But just strategically, how do you look at that cash? Is there any acquisitions or other opportunities that you have to enhance your portfolio?

Look, Chris, I’ll go first here and Mark will probably add to what I say. I’d say, first of all, we want strong balance sheet flexibility to support what we’re trying to do strategically. This is a big year in terms of CapEx. We have said that in addition to organic growth, we will look at inorganic growth that really supports the current portfolio. So we have that flexibility. And obviously, we are off to a meaningful start on returning cash to shareholders. So all three of those to me really drive us toward supporting the mandate of very strong revenue growth, expanded EBITDA margin, and then a fairly significant having just up to our guidance on adjusted EPS, 15% to 20% CAGR through 2020. So that’s how we think about our balance sheet today that it really supports the objectives that we’ve laid out for shareholders.

And, Chris, we – I know you’ve heard us at Investor Day and we said it before. But as we’re generating $2 billion to $3 billion of free cash flow over the next few years, we will – one of the things I want to make sure everyone understands about is, I hope you understand that we’ve been very diligent and disciplined in how we do things. And as we look at potential acquisition opportunities, we’re going to have that same discipline and diligence going forward. So we’re not going to surprise anybody by doing something that doesn’t make sense, it’s going to be logical if we go forward with something. But we’re constantly looking at ways to enhance an already strong portfolio. And if and when we do that, it’ll be because there’s something that makes sense to be added to us that we could drive harder than maybe it was driven before.

Thanks, guys.

Thanks.

I would now like to turn the call back to Mark Vergnano for closing remarks.

Well, again, thanks, everyone, for your questions. As we look back over the last 2.5 years as a standalone company, it’s clear that Chemours today is a fundamentally different company than it was on July 1, 2015. And this remarkable progress would not have been possible without the dedication and the resilience of our employees. Each individual’s devotion to complete the 5-point transformation plan has really helped us to achieve the impressive financial results that we just reviewed. So as we look forward, I’m eager to begin our new chapter as a company committed to earning our way to growth. So, again, thank you for your interest today, but thanks for your continued interest in Chemours.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.