Good day, and welcome to the CECO Environmental First Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Shawn Severson. Please go ahead, sir.

Great, thank you. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on CECO Environmental’s conference call and webcast to discuss the financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2015. I will remind everybody that there is a presentation we will be referring to throughout the call today, so I encourage you to download it on CECO’s website. On the call with me today are Jeff Lang, CEO and President; and Ed Prajzner, Chief Financial Officer. Jeff and Ed will be reviewing the financial results and will also provide an update on the company’s strategy and outlook. Following the prepared remarks, we will open up the questions. The call is being webcast and can be accessed at CECO’s website at cecoenviro.com. The webcast will be posted on CECO’s website for replay approximately 2 hours following the end of this call. The replay will stay on site for on-demand review over the next several months. Before we begin, I would like to caution investors regarding forward-looking statements. Any statements made in today’s presentation are not based on historical facts. Such statements are based on certain estimates and expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual future results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the risks described in CECO’s SEC filings, including CECO’s Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Except to the extent required by applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update or publicly revise any of the forward-looking statements that we make here today, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Today’s presentation also contains non-GAAP financial measures. For purposes of Regulation G, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of historical or future financial performance that excludes amounts that are included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statement of income, balance sheet or statement of cash flows or equivalent statements. In accordance with the requirements of Regulation G, the table in the appendix of the presentation slides represents the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, reconciled non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA to the comparable GAAP measure. Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered supplemental to and not as a substitute for or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. And now, I would like to turn the call over to Jeff to begin the discussion.

Good morning. Thank you, Shawn. Thank you everybody for joining the CECO Environmental conference call and webcast to discuss the financial results for Q1. We appreciate your continuing interest as we continue our journey to build a premier company and grow our global business. As many of you know, we announced earlier this week that we are acquiring PMFG, and I want to reiterate our excitement regarding that transaction. We are going to focus primarily on first quarter results during the call, but I encourage you to review the transcript regarding PMFG and the associated slide deck from our call earlier this week. I will provide an overview of the quarter, some brief financial highlights. And Ed Prajzner, our Chief Financial Officer, will discuss the financial results in much more detail. I will then close with an update on the business and some other strategic comments for the quarter. Let’s begin with Slide 6. Revenue in the quarter increased $23.8 million to $81 million or 41.6% higher than last quarter and is 6% higher sequentially. This is another record for CECO and it was driven by a combination of organic growth and revenue from acquisitions. On an organic basis, revenue grew approximately 9% on a constant currency basis. Acquisitions in the quarter contributed $20.5 million compared to the previous year. On a consolidated basis, bookings were a record $93.9 million for the quarter, up 47% compared to last year’s $63.6 million. On an organic basis, I am pleased to announce that bookings were up approximately 9% and demonstrate the fact that our Sales Excellence and the One-CECO initiative are paying dividends. Further, this equates to a favorable book-to-bill ratio of approximately 1.16. Our backlog remains very strong, reaching a record level of $153 million in the quarter, up from $140…

Thank you, Jeff and good morning everyone. As mentioned earlier, I will highlight in a little more detail both the GAAP and non-GAAP performance for the quarter, particularly regarding our segments. As a reminder, our non-GAAP adjustments include acquisition and integration expenses, the impact of acquisition, asset valuation adjustments on the income statement, which results in higher depreciation, amortization and earn-out expense. Our non-GAAP presentations intend to provide better trend analysis and assessment of our core business performance. We have included in the slides, Slide 12 through 15 the historical perspectives sequentially. Jeff has discussed the quarterly results. So, I am going to move directly to the segment section of the presentation beginning on Page 16. So, financials on Page 16, revenue in our environmental segment was $41.7 million, up 56% from $26.7 million in the prior year period. Bookings were very strong at $51 million driven primarily by our global cyclone division. On an organic basis, we estimate bookings were up approximately 15%. However, we did experience a bit of margin erosion in the quarter due to some of the lower margin business being processed as Jeff discussed earlier, and this is a top priority for us improving this area. Moving on to Slide 17, revenue in our energy segment was $24.3 million, up 58% from $15.3 million in the prior year period. The higher revenue was driven by the strong bookings in the third quarter of 2014. That is the large strategic natural gas power generation project in Middle East. This project is expected to be completed in the third quarter of this year. Moving on to Slide 18, revenue in our fluid handling segment was $15.2 million, down slightly on a year-over-year and sequential basis. Bookings were however, up modestly and gross margin improved in the fluid handling business over the same period of last year. Lastly moving on to Slide 19, on our balance sheet, cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2015 were $18.9 million versus $19.4 million as of year end. Outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities and term loans were $114.6 million as of March 31, 2015 compared to $114.2 million as of year end. Although we did pay down term debt during the quarter, we borrowed under our revolving credit facility. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was approximately 30% versus 35% in the same period of last year. With that, I will turn the call back over to Jeff before we open it up to your questions.

Thanks Ed. Although we are not satisfied with our operating margin in Q1, we do know that they are temporary and based on strategic decisions. We were pleased with the revenue and bookings in the quarter and we are optimistic that Q2 and the remainder of 2015 will be much better, given our record level of backlog. We continue to execute on our core objectives that we have talked about for several years. We continue to implement our strategic initiatives around three core operating segments and building a great foundation to increase shareholder value in 2015 and well beyond. As discussed in our previous earnings call, we now have a broader and stronger portfolio today than we did a year ago. The addition of PMFG is expected to play a critical role in that strategy, with a substantial platform to reach our mid-term aspiration of an excess of $100 million in EBITDA and well over $1 million in revenue. In conclusion, I believe we made solid progress in the quarter and our focus remains on driving profitable growth and creating long-term shareholder value. I am very pleased with where our company is positioned. We have an excellent management leadership team in place. We look forward to embracing the PMFG team into the CECO family. We have the right platform and focus and team in place to make CECO a premier company. I would now like to open it up for any questions you may have.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will go first to Brian Drab with William Blair.

Good morning Jeff, Ed, Shawn.

Hi, good morning Brian.

First question is can you give us a little more detail regarding what surprised you with the Emtrol and Effox margins, it sounded like clearly, there is timing of shipment of certain orders, but also a demand issue at Effox, is price coming down in these businesses or can you give us some kind of – a little more confidence that this was just a blip?

Yes. I mean, I wouldn’t say I was surprised, I would just say Effox has been going through a transformation. They enjoyed a ton of domestic high margin business for a long time, that’s tapered off some and the team now is relatively pursuing the global markets. We need to move a little bit faster in Asia, a little bit faster in India. We are gearing up on the aftermarket side and the retrofit side domestically and that’s starting to help a little bit. We put in a new leader that has a lot of global and aftermarket experiences. So it’s a transformation of the business. As that business has flattened out a little bit domestically, we just need to move faster on the sales side with Effox and Zhongli in Asia. We are rebranding the Effox-Zhongli damper and diverter business, which will help accelerate activity in Asia. We have a lot of sales activity in India now. And we are excited about where that business is going. We just had a – they are going through a transformation. On the Emtrol-Buell side, that business is actually performing very well. The intake of business actually has exceeded our expectation. There are some legacy cyclone businesses that had a little bit lower gross margin that we are processing through. At the end of the day, we think the Emtrol-Buell business is going to be one of our premier businesses around the world. It’s an asset-light business. It has very low working capital and it has an excellent team. We are just going through some – we are just going through some – we are just processing some low margin projects, but I am very excited about where they are going to be in the future.

Okay. And how is price trending in these businesses? And I guess, how – can you make any broader comment on price and the trends you saw in the quarter?

Relative to the pricing we could obtain from our end markets, Brian?

I guess, I am just wondering – let me broaden the question and we have been – you gave us some good detail regarding the operating environment in the first quarter. And it sounds like it’s a little better than I would have expected given some of your end market exposure and what we are seeing from other companies with broad energy exposure, but could – so that’s kind of the background for my question. In this tough operating environment, are you finding that you are having to give up some price to move equipment and ship orders?

No, I don’t – I don’t think there is an overarching comment about price realization or price degradation. I think it’s pretty similar to how it’s been in the past year or so. I would say on these large energy projects that we are pursuing globally through Aarding, those are probably two or three points below the typical CECO run-rate, but these are $3 million, $4 million, $5 million, $6 million projects. These carry terrific gross profit dollars, but they are probably in the 25%, 26% range. However, the Emtrol-Buell, occasionally, we have to make some concessions. They are the leader in the cyclone technology business within the refinery. We are trying to be sensitive to some of the legacy pricing, but I think long-term, there is some – there will be price realization in the Emtrol-Buell business. There will be fabrication and manufacturing opportunities as well. So, I think we are just getting started with the Emtrol-Buell – the Emtrol-Buell marketing and the pricing strategy. But as far as the integration goes, they are already operating as one team. They are moving globally as a unit. And I am very pleased with the traction of the Emtrol-Buell business. We need to make sure we get through some of the low margin projects and keep working on price realization and some cost-out opportunities.

Okay. And then moving into second quarter in terms of gross margin, it sounded like we should be expecting gross margin to be under pressure through the second quarter, because your comment was that it should improve in the second half. Is it fair to conclude that we should model kind of flat gross margin from first quarter to second quarter?

Correct. You are absolutely correct. And then we are looking for some nice – some solid uplift in the second half of – second half of ‘15 and more so in ‘16.

Do you think you can get back to that 30% to – kind of 30% to 32% range in the second half of ‘15?

No, probably not. I think the legacy CECO business clearly will move up a little bit, but one of the things that we started to message a quarter ago was we have roughly $100 million now of really nice business between the Emtrol, the Zhongli and the large natural gas projects out of Aarding that are probably a few points below our normal run-rate, but it’s still excellent business. We strategically want that business. And further, those businesses have a leaner operating footprint, which ultimately should get us back to those operating margins that we are aspiring to. So, I hope that gives you a little color around the margin outlook.

Yes – no, that helps. And then I am looking at the consensus forecast for revenue for the rest of the year and I am wondering if you could give us any comments here, $84 million in revenue for the second quarter, $84 million in the third quarter, $86 million in the fourth quarter. Can you give us any comment regarding how you feel about that forecast and how attainable those types of numbers are?

Yes, we study that quite a bit, Brian. And I read the consensus as well. I think we have finished 2014 with a pro forma of around $325 million, $327 million. And I think if you put on a normalized organic growth rate with that, I think that puts us probably right in that $350 million range, which is the consensus. So, our aspiration would be to hit that or exceed that.

Okay, thanks very much.

Yes, thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We will go next to Gerry Sweeney at ROTH Capital. Mr. Sweeney your line is open. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Just to follow-up, as you were looking at the bookings as we go forward, do you have – how are the margins looking at bookings on a go forward basis and when do we start to see that, are they in the 30% to 33% range or are we booking below that, just as a follow-up to the previous questions?

Hi Gerry, it’s Ed. As Jeff just explained, yes there is a little lower expectation in that booking, as Jeff alluded to with the – that will come through here in the second quarter or second half and going forward, the new acquisitions having lower margin expectations, although lower SG&A profile as well in addition to the large natural gas projects, so yes there is a little lower expectation in that backlog and the historical margins.

Okay. And then as you were talking about the SG&A and your aspirations for the operating margins, I mean can you give us a little bit of – a little bit more detail exactly what those aspirations are and maybe a – is there a step process or a process from today to how you – to what those targets are in the future?

Sure. When we acquire a business that we have studied and evaluated for many years, we have recognized their gross profit profile. We have recognized their SG&A profile. And we want to make sure, over a reasonable time period, 2015 is the integration year. We are going to pull out some nice synergies on the rev and cost-out. And those businesses that have a couple points sort of lower gross profit margin, they also have a couple points of lower SG&A footprint. So we still believe, as we migrate through the integration and the growth in ‘15, ‘16 and ‘17 they will have the capacity to reach our operating margin aspiration. It just takes a little time to get to that level.

And I mean what is that operating margin number?

Well, as you can see we are tracking at 10% operating margin range for the first half. The numbers pretty well spell that out. Long-term, we have aspirations to be a 15% operating margin business. That’s what we would like to achieve with our portfolio, with our pricing strategies, with our leverage, with our asset light footprint and our very, very attractive lean operating model. So that’s going to take us time to achieve that, but that’s what the management team is focused on. And we have some work to do to get there.

Okay. And then finally, just switching over to aftermarket, how was the aftermarket business in general in the first quarter, any weaknesses in certain areas. I think there was a little bit of some pressure points in maybe the second half of last year maybe it was the air pollution control business, but curious as to how that continues to move forward and longer term, you are shooting for 40%, so maybe a little background on that?

Good question, thank you. We talk about that monthly about our aftermarket and reoccurring revenue growth strategy, every business unit is very focused on that. We have added a lot of capacity to grow the aftermarket business. The IT team is very focused on making sure we have the installed base and the customer database to assure we can revise the sales focus. The team here is going to start publishing more data on the reoccurring revenue versus the operating – versus the original equipment metrics. Our aspiration is 40% over the mid-term. Gerry, you are correct, we are probably in – north of a third right now. So you are going to see a little more color around that. We are going to be investing in an aftermarket director of strategy to help accelerate the divisions. And I would say the aftermarket business is as strong today as it’s ever been at CECO. We are excited to work with the PMFG team later in the year to expand the combined $5 billion of installed base. But it is probably our top three – one of our top three priorities for growth going forward. But when we launch our Q2 earnings, you are going to see a little more color and metrics around reoccurring revenue versus original equipment.

Got it. Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

You’re welcome. Thank you.

And we will go next to Scott Graham at Jefferies.

Hi, good morning Jeff. Good morning, Ed.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Just wanted to ask a couple of questions about some statements that you made Jeff, as you were answering some questions and what have you. I am sure I can figure this out, but I just kind of wanted to hear it from you. When you say kind of $350 million revenue territory via applying a normal organic growth number, what is the organic growth number you are thinking of?

We have not published organic growth numbers, Scott. We clearly want to be equal to or better than other industrial technology companies. And I think the $350 million number was what was published by the consensus of the research analysts and that was the $350 million number. And that reflects probably a...

I am with you…

Thank you.

Yes. I get it completely. And when you say you want to be a 15% operating margin business are you talking about operating margin before amortization?

Correct, that would be on a non-GAAP operating margin basis. Correct.

Okay, great. That’s really all I had. Thank you.

Thank you.

And that does conclude today’s question-and-answer session. I will turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.

Thank you for joining our call today. We will talk again in next quarter.

And that does conclude today’s conference. Again thank you for your participation.