Good day, everyone, and welcome to today’s Celcuity Release of the Second Quarter 2020 Financial Results. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, you'll have the opportunity to ask questions during the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please note today’s call may be recorded. [Operator Instructions]. It is now my pleasure to turn today’s conference over to Brian Sullivan and Vicky Hahne. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for a discussion of Celcuity's second quarter 2020 financial results and business highlights. We issued a press release announcing our financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2020 a few minutes ago. Today's press release can be found on the Investors section of our Web site, www.celcuity.com. Before we begin, I would like to remind listeners that our comments today will include some forward-looking statements. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in today's press release and in our reports and filings with the SEC. Actual events or results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements and their implications involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those projected. On this call, we also refer to non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures are used by management to make strategic decisions, forecast future results and evaluate the company's current performance. Management believes the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is useful for investors’ understanding and assessment of the company's ongoing core operations and prospects for the future. You can find the table reconciling the non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures in today's press release. And with that, I'd like to introduce Brian Sullivan, our CEO.

Thank you, Vicky, and good afternoon, everyone. I'm really pleased that you joined us today for an update on our progress this past quarter. I’ll first comment on our second quarter results focusing in particular on the status of our product development projects, our collaboration discussions and our FACT-1 and FACT-2 clinical trials. Vicky will follow me to discuss our financial results, and then we will open the line for questions. Celcuity 3rd generation diagnostic platform CELsignia identifies the underlying cellular activity, dysregulated pathway signaling that drives many cancers and this allows us to diagnose dysregulated signaling pathways in a patient's tumor that has a disease mechanism treatable with a matching targeted therapy. Our strategy is to help pharmaceutical companies obtain new indications for their targeted therapies to treat the patients our CELsignia tests identify. Since dysregulated signaling is too complex for molecular tests to characterize, we can leverage the capability of our CELsignia platform to create a proprietary business model. To execute our strategy, we continue to advance development of additional CELsignia Pathway Activity tests during the second quarter. In June, we presented results from studies of our first CELsignia Pathway Activity test for ovarian cancer at the American Association for Cancer Research, or AACR, annual meeting. Our CELsignia test for ovarian cancer identifies a subset of ovarian cancer patients whose tumors have abnormal c-Met signaling that’s coincident with abnormal HER2 signaling. Nearly 15,000 women a year die from ovarian cancer, which is a disease that has less than a 50% five-year survival rate. Only a small portion of ovarian cancer patients benefit today from the advancements made over the past 20 years in molecular-based medicine since most patients lack an actionable biomarker, which is typically a molecular mutation. These patients have an undiagnosed cancer driver and are precluded…

Our second quarter net loss was 2.2 million or $0.21 per share compared to 1.72 million net loss or $0.17 per share for the second quarter of 2019. Net loss for the first six months of the year 2020 were 4.45 million or $0.43 per share compared to 3.57 million or $0.35 per share for the same period in 2019. Because these quarterly net losses include a significant non-cash item, which is stock-based compensation, we also included in our press release non-GAAP adjusted net loss for the quarter. Our non-GAAP adjusted net loss was 1.78 million or $0.17 per share for the second quarter of 2020 compared to non-GAAP adjusted net loss of 1.53 million or $0.15 per share for the second quarter of 2019. Non-GAAP adjusted net loss for the first six months of 2020 was 3.56 million or $0.34 per share compared to non-GAAP adjusted net loss of 3.19 million or $0.31 per share for the first six months of 2019. R&D expenses increased approximately 0.55 million during the first six months of 2020 compared to the first six months of 2019. This was primarily due to 8.52 million increase in compensation expense, which included 0.36 million of non-cash stock-based compensation. In addition, other research and development expenses increased 0.03 million due to clinical validation and laboratory studies and operational and business development activities. The approximately 0.16 million increase in G&A during the second quarter of 2020 compared to the second quarter of 2019 was attributable to non-cash stock-based compensation. We ended the quarter with approximately 15.4 million of cash and cash equivalents. The net cash used in operating activities for the second quarter of 2020 was 1.56 million. This was a result of non-GAAP adjusted net loss of 1.78 million offset by 0.12 million of working capital changes in prepaid assets and accounts payable and depreciation expense of 0.10 million.

Thank you, Vicky. So in summary, we’re pleased with the progress we’re making. We’ve presented data for two new CELsignia tests in two different tumor types over the past nine months. Our discussions with pharmaceutical companies and clinical sponsors continued to advance and we expect to close some collaborations this year. We expect to present data for another CELsignia test for breast cancer patients by the end of 2020. And we remain confident that we’ll obtain interim results from FACT-1 and 2 trials in the second half of 2021. Operator, we would now like to take questions.

[Operator Instructions]. And we’ll take our first question from Yi Chen with H.C. Wainwright. Please go ahead.

Hi. This is Boobalan dialing in for Yi Chen. So I’ve got a couple of questions. So the first one, you mentioned about the new clinical trial collaboration. So do you happen to know how many such collaborations are expected to be later this year and will it be focused on ovarian cancer?

So thanks for your question. We expect one to two collaborations to be announced this year and then several additional ones first half next year. The collaborations that we’re working on now or that we would expect to announce in the near term would be for breast cancer. Discussions for ovarian cancer just began and we won’t expect those collaborations to come to fruition until probably towards the end of next year 2021.

Yes. That’s really helpful. And do you expect any upfront payment from your partners for such collaborations?

We’re not going to characterize those collaborations until they’re finalized. So at the time we announce them, we’ll be able to describe those in detail.

Duration for those [ph] when the clinical trials may start?

I’m sorry. For the collaboration? Is that what you’re talking about?

Yes.

Well, as you know, there’s a fair amount of time from when you may reach an agreement to conduct a study to the work of getting the IRB approval [indiscernible] drug supply. And so it depends on a particular partner and their processes, but there can be six to nine months of time from the time you announce an agreement to when you’re actually enrollment ready. And again, that will be specific to each collaboration.

Okay, that’s helpful. And on FACT-1 and FACT-2 trials, still enrolling patients amid the pandemic?

After the end of the quarter, yes. But there was roughly a period both of the second quarter when most of the sites were not admitting patients who weren’t COVID-19 and for the most part shutdown their clinical trial activity.

Okay. And one final question from me. When do you expect to release validation results for the CELsignia RAS essay test?

So we expect to be able to provide additional data – the next round of data would be towards the end of this year. That’s our current goal.

[Operator Instructions]. We’ll take our next question from Alex Nowak. Please go ahead.

Great. Good afternoon, everyone. This is actually Will Fafinski on for Alex. Thanks for taking our questions. First from me, could you just provide us with the look into how things effectively progressed this summer with the FACT trials and just discuss the pace of enrollment thus far in Q3? Thanks.

Right. So I would say up to Q2, the sites were – and that means end of June, most of our sites were either not enrolling or just getting back on line. And I would say in July we saw more of the sites begin to reinitiate activity. There’s been – I don’t want to say necessarily a pause, but I think as you know in some of the states there was an uptick which caused some sites and it was really site-specific, location-specific to curtail some activities. So I would say the trend has been upward and I would say most sites have reengaged, but there as you might expect some bumps along the way. But I really expect unless some other – and again that’s the problem with COVID-19, there’s a lot of unknowns, but the current trajectory would suggest that we would be back to full activity by the end of this quarter certainly and maybe before. But we’re still maintaining our guidance for results second half of '21

Got you. I appreciate it. That’s very helpful color there. And then actually just one for me. We were wondering how was the reduction in patients getting screened thus less cancer diagnoses impacted the prevalence of cancer targeted in FACT-1, FACT-2. Just what are your thoughts on how this impacts enrollment in Q3 and beyond?

I would hate to get too precise about that. You may have read, there have been some reports out that the number of cancer diagnoses in general declined in the second quarter because patients weren’t being scheduled for biopsies and diagnostic procedures. Does that lead to a blip in Q3? I don’t want to get in the business of trying to forecast something like that. I think there’s so much noise in the system, it’s hard to – or at least I’m not comfortable projecting off of that. But I’m aware of the fact that some people suggesting that there’s a backlog and maybe in some areas that that will translate directly. We don’t have enough experience to get in the nature of what we’re doing to forecast that precisely.

Understood. Thanks for taking the questions and best of luck moving forward.

Thank you. Take care.

[Operator Instructions].

Okay. So I think – unless we have other questions, any other questions in the queue.

No, there are no further questions on the line at this time.

Okay. Thank you very much, everyone. I appreciate you attending the call and look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Take care.

This does conclude today’s program. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.