Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Carlyle Group Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your host, Mr. Daniel Harris, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Whitney. Good morning, and welcome to Carlyle’s Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. With me on the call this morning is our Chief Executive Officer, Kewsong Lee; and our Chief Financial Officer, Curt Buser. This call is being webcast, and a replay will be available on our website. We will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures during today’s call. These measures should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We have provided reconciliations of these measures to GAAP in our earnings release. Any forward-looking statements made today do not guarantee future performance, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. These statements are based on current management expectations and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, including those identified in the Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated. Carlyle assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements at any time. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release and a detailed earnings presentation, which is also available on our Investor Relations website. For the second quarter, we generated $143 million in fee-related earnings and $395 million in distributable earnings, with DE per common share of $0.88. We declared a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per common share. To ensure participation by all those on the call today, please limit yourself to 1 question and 1 follow-up and then return to the queue for any additional questions. With that, let me turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Kewsong Lee.

Thank you, Dan. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. In February, we unveiled a new strategic plan to accelerate growth in earnings over the next 4 years. We laid out the targets, initiatives and changes we are implementing to drive our firm forward. Essential to our objective of performing well for our stakeholders is scale and speed, which is why our senior leadership team is focused on ensuring we’re the best investors we can be and leading the company to operate better and faster than ever before. I am pleased to tell you that we are delivering results that are larger and occurring sooner than previously expected. With our investment platform firing on all cylinders, we are confident in the momentum we are building to drive growth in earnings in the years to come. We have built a talented and diverse leadership team that is executing well. Together, we’ve made meaningful changes that are helping us deliver very attractive and, in some cases, record results as we usher in a new chapter of growth at Carlyle. What our performance this quarter really underscores is that the changes we’ve made are paying off for our stakeholders, which I’d like to summarize with the same framework I outlined at our Investor Day: think bigger, perform better, move faster. Let me start with moving faster as the velocity of virtually all aspects of our business has increased. Deals are being completed on shorter time lines, financings are being executed more quickly, opportunities for exits are presenting themselves sooner, funds are being raised faster than ever before, and accelerating impact from disruptive technology and changes from the pandemic are powering an increased demand for private capital across sectors and regions. The new direction of our organization positions Carlyle well to…

Thank you, Kew, and good morning, everyone. In my remarks, I will address 3 themes that complement and expand upon Kew’s comments: First, our fee-related earnings growth is accelerating, producing near-term results greater than our prior expectations; second, the spigot for generating larger realized performance income is wide open and is likely to remain so; and finally, we’re focused on converting lower-value performance income and excess capital into higher value and sustainable FRE platform growth. So let’s begin by discussing the accelerating growth in our fee-related earnings. As Kew mentioned, fundraising is ahead of schedule for our largest and most successful funds. Our capital markets activity is strong, and our platforms are well positioned for growth. Over the next year or 2, we expect top line fee growth will drive higher FRE and margins, even with an expected increase in expenses. During the second quarter, we generated $143 million of fee-related earnings. And year-to-date FRE of $272 million increased 20% over 2020, when adjusting for $30 million of expense recovery in Q1 of last year. The FRE increase owes both the top line growth and continued strong focus on expense management. I previously expected 2021 FRE to be at a similar level to 2020 when excluding the expense recovery but now expect the first half of 2021 FRE run rate to be generally sustainable in the back half of the year. While premature to predict 2022, we believe we are set up for even greater FRE growth next year. Our confidence in near-term FRE acceleration is underpinned by fundraising, capital markets activity and platform construction. First, fundraising activity is substantial, not only in real estate but various growth vehicles, buyout funds, CLO formation, credit strategies, and alpha invest [ph] platform activity. The strong first close in our new opportunistic real…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from the line of Ken Worthington with JP Morgan.

Maybe let’s start on fundraising. You set a target of $130 billion at Analyst Day, and the press is suggesting good investor feedback on your funds in the market. And both Kew and Curt, you both highlighted how things are doing much, much better, more funds reaching their hard caps or expected to meet their hard caps versus just their targets. Yet your expectations are $130 billion plus. So maybe help us out what might be the upper end of your comfort zone assuming that this constructive environment would persist? Is $130 billion-plus, could that be 150? Is it 160? Like how high might that be if everything were to go perfectly and you were to hit the hard caps on the majority of the funds that you expect to be in the market over the next few years?

Ken, it’s Kew. Thanks for your question. Look, let’s focus on the plus of the $130 billion-plus. And things are just going great right now. As you pointed out, market conditions are strong. And we very much are ahead of schedule. We’re seeing real success in driving organic growth in our biggest and best established funds. Now look, not all funds are going to keep growing at the 40% to 50% rate that we’ve been seeing more recently. But having said that, it’s about our performance, it’s about the LPs’ view of us as a consistent trustworthy partner over time, it’s about our ability to deploy well, and it’s about our ability to return that capital back to them. And so this is a multiyear campaign. We’ve got several years to go, but we’re really confident based on the reception that we’ve seen thus far in the market with respect to the plus of that target that you pointed out. And then finally, I’d say, look, the trends we’re seeing with our LPs, the fact that the cross-selling opportunities just continue to increase, the fact that the fundraising cycle for us is happening fast, in other words, velocity of fundraising is higher, all of this bodes well, and I’m really proud and excited for our team. But it’s early days. We have several more years to go. But suffice it to say, the initial feedback is positive, and we very much are focused on the plus of the $130 billion-plus target we laid out for you.

Okay. I tried to put you on a number, but at least it was worth the try. And then, Kew, you suggested things are happening faster; fundraising, investing and harvesting all happening faster. How much of the life cycle of a fund is compressed? Like what is the life cycle of a fund now versus what it might have been in the last cycle? And is this compression purely cyclical and really just a function of a great environment? Or is there something more secular here? And if it is more secular -- ultimately the dividend is still $0.25. If things are feeling so much better and feel like they’re sustaining themselves, why not increase that $0.25?

Okay. Let me tackle the first part of your question first. And I guess the answer in a pithy way is yes to all the factors you laid out. Clearly, there are cyclical reasons why things are happening great right now because of the current environment that we’re in. But there are also some secular and structural things happening in our industry. Let’s start first with just the change of -- the changes that are happening because of COVID and because of technology disruption, the fact that entrepreneurs just want to stay private for longer, The fact that all types of companies, whether they’re growth disruptors or large incumbents, are approaching private capital to partner with us because we can help them make their companies better and we can help them accelerate their growth, all of this longer-term bodes well for the fact that our opportunity set in private equity continues to grow. Second, yes, the speed is accelerating. There are changes to how deals get done these days because of the hybrid environment. I personally think some of those will stick post -- and I want to be careful in terms of even saying post-pandemic, but when we get through the worst of this, I do believe you’re going to see some of those changes stick because it’s just more efficient the way processes are handled these days. And finally, I think, we as a firm, because we’re better connected, because of the big investments we’ve made to build out teams, deep sector expertise, we just have conviction and can move faster. We have domain expertise. We have huge platform resources. We bring it to bear on deals, and it enables us to move quicker while still having great investment judgment on opportunities. Now finally, you marry that with the fact that when we raise our funds, typically, we, as a rule of thumb, have thought about investing a fund across, let’s say, a 4, maybe 5-year time horizon, but that clearly has sped up. Because of the opportunity set increasing, because of the demand for private capital increasing, 5 has become 4, in some instances 3 years, maybe even sooner in certain high-velocity asset classes like credit. So the time line to deploy a fund has in fact increased. But look, none of this matters if you don’t perform well. We’re focused on being the best investing firm we can be. If we can drive great returns over the long term, the fundraising will continue to be easy. So let me just stop there. With respect to your dividend comment, let me ask Curt to comment on that.

So Ken, on dividends just, as you’ll recall, what we’ve consistently said is we look at dividends, first and foremost, to make sure that’s fixed and sustainable. I don’t want fluctuations and definitely do not want it going down. Do want it to grow over time. And what we’ve said there is we’re looking to grow in fee-related earnings and looking at that in arrears on an after-tax basis. And we all know, we’re reading the press, we’re seeing what’s going on, we’ll probably see some increases in taxes. You’ve see an increase in our own tax rate. And so we’re looking at all that on an after-tax basis. But look, I’m feeling really comfortable about our FRE growth. I’m feeling really good about the $800 million. And we’ll be assessing that in due course, but pursuant to the guidelines that I just laid out.

Next question is from the line of Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs.

I was hoping you could spend a couple of minutes on your capital priorities. Obviously, Carlyle is going to be generating a lot of cash flows over the next couple of years as you enter the sort of super cycle for performance fees. Can you help us frame how this will be used? What are the areas of inorganic opportunities you might be looking at? And if you were to use some of this cash to see additional products at Carlyle, what are some of the areas of new investments you’re looking to deploy that capital?

Great. Thanks, Alex. Let me start on this one. So really just taking off on what I just said in the prepared remarks, you’re absolutely right that we’re going to be accumulating a fair amount of cash over the next few years, and particularly as we grow FRE and the carry gains that we see really embedded and as well as the balance sheet investments come through. We’ve been focused on growing organically, which we believe is the highest return on invested capital for our shareholders, and we see plenty of opportunity for doing that. And quite frankly, the forecasts that we gave at Investor Day was really predicated on that organic growth. And so what are we going to do here in the near term? Well, first, we’re going to do just what I said, is we’re going to invest into our larger funds. Second, we’re going to see new products, things like real estate credit, things like infrastructure credit, things like infrastructure, more broadly, renewables. There’s plenty of space in terms of new products for us to continue to seed and invest and drive growth. We’re also -- our capital markets business, look, it’s a natural adjacency. We see real growth there, but you have to also have the balance sheet capital to support those activities. You ought to know this most of all given where you’re from. So that’s one of the areas we’re focused on. And then last, obviously, we’ll take a look at M&A. Prices are high right now. And so that’s why we also like organic growth. But just as Kew has outlined before, we want things that are going to make a difference. We want things that will help us grow, particularly in our credit business where we think that scale also helps. And look, we’ve not lost sight of insurance and other things that we’re looking at, but we want to make sure that things fit in right and can give us the right ability to scale the firm.

Your next question is from the line of Glenn Schorr with Evercore ISI.

Maybe a very high-class problem to have. But if you look at all the performance revenues, 80%, 90% continues to get produced by private equity because that’s where the big base is. So curious if you even think about it that way in terms of balancing out the firm over time? And maybe, while we’re on that topic, we could just touch on where you think you’re at in the credit build-out by product distribution people. However, you want to slice it. I appreciate it.

So Glenn, let me take a shot. So look, we’ve laid out our priorities really well in terms of growing earnings, focused on FRE, focused on improving margins, don’t obviously want to be the lowest cost provider. We want to be able to invest well. We think that that will deliver higher distributable earnings. But in terms of balance sheet, I want to be balance sheet right. And not all AUM is necessarily equally profitable. So the way we really think about our growth is how to drive earnings, first and foremost. And then what we’re also looking at is with the things that we have coming on, we think we can get very nice top line growth. With respect to credit, there’s a lot of growth that’s already occurred. So credit, if you look at really the numbers from an AUM perspective, as of June 30, we’re up about 22% in AUM over last year in the credit business, going from, call it, $50 billion to $61 billion in total AUM. In addition, there’s very good top line growth, about 10% year-to-date over the prior year. Now what’s confusing some of those numbers, which you are probably also seeing, is the FRE margin hasn’t picked up the way I think it will pick up. And this is a business that we think we’re going to double here in the next couple of years. What’s really happening now in terms of some of what you’re seeing on comparison, remember, in the first 6 months of last year, we had the Fulton transaction, generated a lot of transaction fees as well as some cost recoveries first half of last year, obviously not recurring in this quarter now. Second thing is you have a little bit of a drag from energy business and the distressed business. The energy business, you all know, is winding down, and this is not the right time to roll from a distressed play. And so we have a little bit of pressure there. But the growth in our direct lending business, the CLO business is really performing exceptionally strong. Aviation is doubling. I mean things are really happening and really doing very well, and I’m really proud of that team, and I think that we’re going to see some very nice growth going forward.

And then, Glenn, this is Dan. As it relates to the accrual, on your question on concentration, look, just by the way these products have been put together, you’re going to see most of the performance revenues emanating from our global private equity platform. Credit is much more of a fee business. And then what I would say is if you look at Solutions, from just a couple of years ago where we had virtually 0 net accrual, that’s up to about $250 million-plus. And within Global Private Equity, we have good diversity across the U.S., Asia, Europe, real estate. And so we think about it more broadly. Even though we report within Global Private Equity a single segment, there’s a whole lot of strategies in there that make up that accrual. So it is diversified. You will always see the majority of the net performance fees from Global Private Equity, but keep an eye on Solutions as well as that continues to grow.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question is from the line of Adam Beatty with UBS.

I want to ask about the Capital Markets business. I appreciate, the outlook looks like it’s very strong, on track to meet or exceed the financial contribution objectives. Just wondering in the semi-early days, if there were any qualitative takeaways from how that business is going. Obviously, the backdrop is strong. Any evolution in terms of how you see the purpose of it and the size and function 3 to 5 years out for Carlyle?

Adam, thanks for the question. So first, we did some work here to really kind of refocus, energize the group, and it’s really playing out well. The business thus far is, well, I’ll say, ahead of plan. We’re seeing nice growth in our activity as well as the transaction fees that we’ve been seeing. We’re already at a run rate of about $30 million to $40 million in net fees out of just the capital markets part of the business. And I can see that growing very rapidly and being a double that in the next couple of years, if not sooner. And one of the things that we’ve really focused on is making sure that we have the balance sheet capacity to support that growth. And what’s really nice about what’s happened is the team is engaging across the entire platform. So much more integrated across everything we do, both in credit as well as within the various private equity functions. And so our ability to capture the appropriate opportunities out of our existing deal flow is fantastic. And then, look, for the time being, we’re focused on our own business and our own deal flow before going out and doing things elsewhere. But we’ve not lost sight of that opportunity as well. So I do think early days; very good on where we’re headed.

I am showing no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Daniel Harris.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for listening on what I know is a very busy day. Should you have any follow-up questions, feel free to reach out to Investor Relations at any time. Otherwise, we look forward to speaking with you again next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.