Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Centerra Gold 2018 Second Quarter Results Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, we are recording today’s conference, Wednesday, August 1, 2018. And now it’s my pleasure to turn the conference over to John Pearson, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator. I would like to welcome everyone to Centerra Gold’s 2018 second quarter conference call. Today’s conference call is open to all members of the investment community and media. We have summary slides that are available on the company’s website to accompany each speaker’s remarks. Following the formal remarks, the operator will give the instructions for asking a question and then we will open the phone line to the questions. Please note that all figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. Joining me on the call today is Scott Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer; Gordon Reid, Chief Operating Officer; Darren Millman, Chief Financial Officer; and Yousef Rehman, General Counsel. I would also like to caution everyone that certain statements made on this call maybe forward-looking statements and as such are subject to known and unknown risks which may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied. Also, we will discuss today certain measures that are non-GAAP measures and I refer you to our description of non-GAAP measures in the combined news release and MD&A. For a more detailed discussion of the material assumptions, risks and uncertainties please refer to our news release and the MD&A issued this morning, along with the un-audited financial statements and notes and to our other filings, which can all be found on SEDAR or the company’s website. And now I will turn the call over to Scott.

Okay, thank you John and good morning, ladies and gentlemen and thanks for attending our Q2 earnings conference call. As John mentioned, I am just going to be referencing the webcast presentation. And I am just starting off on Slide #5. So, just touching on some of the key highlights during the quarter, first and foremost, we really want to reference the key safety milestone that we achieved at Kumtor during the quarter. On April 11, we achieved 1 year of lost time injury free operations, which also represents some 6 million man-hours without a single lost time injury incident. We are very pleased to see this level of safety performance and we give full kudos to the management team at Kumtor in terms of demonstrating that we can achieve an environment of zero harm. So it’s a great milestone, a great accolade. Second bullet point there, during the quarter, we sold the royalty portfolio for $155 million. This is also inclusive of a $45 million silver stream on the commenced development project in British Columbia. You will see this when we move into our financials. We finished the quarter in a strong financial position and also in terms of our liquidity profile. At Öksüt, during the quarter, we also closed our Öksüt credit financing facility and we made an initial draw of $15 million. Looking at the fourth bullet point there, the construction at Öksüt is progressing very well. Everything is on schedule. I am very pleased with how this operation is performing and again targeting first gold pour here in Q1 of 2020. Just moving into Mount Milligan, a lot of the efforts and the initiatives we have been taking on we have been pursuing in terms of our maintenance at Mount Milligan is resonating. We are seeing…

Thanks Scott. Good morning everyone. Safety performance in Q2 was somewhat average. In the quarter we had four reportable injuries for a total reportable injury frequency rate of 0.33. Of the reportable injuries, two were the result of trips and falls, and two were the result of sprains and strains. Year-to-date we had 11 reportable injuries and a total reportable injury frequency rate of 0.49. Our goal is zero harm and we are still on that journey. The rollout of our Work Safe Home Safe Phase 1 program continues at our development sites OMAS and at Kemess. Rollout of Work Safe Home Safe Phase 2 has been started at both the Kumtor operation and the Mount Milligan operation. I will refer you to Slide 9. In the quarter consolidated production was 130,000 ounces at an all-in sustaining cost per ounce of $996 per ounce. Kumtor produced 83,800 ounces of gold at an all-in sustaining cost per ounce sold at $1,071 per ounce. As Kumtor continues to process from the low grade surface stockpile at Sarytor and cut-back 17 mining done previously, Kumtor mining is currently ahead of schedule. We are expecting to intersect the high grade SB zone ore in cut-back 18 within Q3. Mount Milligan produced 46,380 ounces of gold at an all-in sustaining cost per ounce of $700 per ounce. Mount Milligan also produced 16.5 million pounds of copper. We have reduced our guidance at Mount Milligan given the ongoing challenge of sourcing sufficient water to keep the mill operating at full throughput. We have applied to the BC regulatory agencies to allow for temporary withdrawal of water from nearby surface and groundwater sources until July 2020. The application is pending. Development on our Öksüt project is advancing on budget and on schedule. Our Greenstone project received a…

Thanks Gord. Good morning everyone. For those following on the slide deck, I will be talking to Slide 15. Total revenue from operations during the quarter was $243 million, $117 million in gold sales in the quarter attributable to the Kumtor operations and $76 million in copper gold sales from the Mount Milligan operations. It’s a 13% comparative quarter decrease in revenue largely attributable to Kumtor processing lower grade surface stockpiles from Sarytor and cut-back 17, as mentioned by Gord. Operating cash flow before changes in working capital during the quarter was $47.5 million, the significant change attributable to Kumtor operations with approximately 30% less gold sold in the quarter and the all-in sustaining cost approximately 35% higher in the current quarter compared to the prior year. The lower production and the higher cost ounces were expected and in accordance with the 2018 plan. Net earnings for the quarter was $43.5 million, with the major contributor for the earnings during the quarter was the gain on the sale of the gold royalty portfolio of $28 million and the additional $10 million in payments receivable from the sale of our ATO project in Mongolia, which was previously announced. After taking into consideration these non-recurring items, the company’s adjusted earnings for the quarter was just under $1 million or nil per share. On a consolidated level, Centerra realized gold prices during the quarter of $1,176 per ounce and $1,165 per ounce in the prior year quarter. Copper during the same period was $2.23 per pound and $1.90 per pound, both net of stream arrangements. I will now be talking to Slide 16. 140,427 ounces of gold were sold during the quarter and 12.7 million pounds of copper. Consolidated all-in sustaining cost of $996 per ounce was achieved in the quarter and as mentioned by Gord, Kumtor recording all-in sustaining cost per ounce of $1,071 with Mount Milligan recording $700 per ounce. As highlighted by Scott earlier, we received $155 million in cash receipts from the sale of the gold royalty portfolio during the quarter. This has enabled us to further reduce our overall net debt position to $110 million. The company remains in a very strong financial position with $574 million in liquidity, with all conditions preset met on the Öksüt credit facility during the quarter. The company is currently also evaluating several options on the Kumtor – on the Kemess project with our current focus on off-take financing and project financing. With that, I will turn it back to Scott.

Okay. Thank you, Darren. Just wrapping up on Slide 18, so again just referencing the world industry cost curve in terms of all-in sustaining cost metric. Again just showing where each of Centerra’s assets is positioned and just trying to highlight our go-forward strategy. The strategy is one of ongoing profitability obviously in terms of Kumtor and Mount Milligan we think these are significant top tier assets that will underpin the company moving forward. Öksüt is in construction now. As I mentioned earlier, we think it’s going to be our third source of low-cost, high-quality production. So really in terms of our strategy it’s one of growing intrinsic value. We think we have got the right asset portfolio. We think we have got the strong liquidity in terms of our financial horsepower and more and more it’s just going to be about executing on this moving forward. With that, I would like to pass the call back to the operator. And we can just go into the question-and-answer section.

Thank you very much. [Operator Instructions] And our first question is from David Haughton with CIBC. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Scott and team. Thanks for the update. Just looking at Mount Milligan, just wondering what your throughput strategy is whilst you are waiting for the permit, would you look to conserve as much water as possible or would you just be running it say at the 50,000 to 60,000 tons a day? And just trying to get an idea as to what your thinking is here.

David, it’s Gordon. Our strategy will be to run the mill at the highest level of throughput without risk of having a shutdown. We don’t want to have a shutdown and there is a minimum pond level that we have targeted that we would work towards.

Okay. So, in your commentary you had said that the pond has currently got about 1 million cubic meters, what sort of minimum are you thinking about here?

Yes. That’s really more to just a prescribed number. We have to look at the potential of freezing where it is in the pond, the potential of sucking up dirty water and potentially damaging the mill. So, we don’t have a prescribed number. It’s more of a general number than subject to these other criteria. So, I really can’t give you a number.

Alright. So, talking about freezing, that doesn’t really apply so much to the third quarter, so I am just trying to get a beat as to what we should be thinking about as the average throughput in the third quarter. Would it be above 50,000 tons a day, would you say?

It’s all subject to the availability of water. And as you know, we have applied for these temporary approvals to draw water from groundwater and surface water sources. If we get approval, if we get access to that water in the fourth quarter, we will be able to achieve our 55,000 ton per day guidance. If we don’t get access to that water, it will be a lower amount than that, a lower throughput than that.

And David, it’s Scott. Just to clarify, I think your question was with regards to Q3 and I think Gordon is more speaking to Q4. So in terms of Q3, David, we have got a 10-day shutdown for the primary crusher, which is complete. So, that was in the month of July. And then in September, the BC Hydro authorities, they have got a scheduled shutdown for 5 days. And so, in the spirit of your question the days every other day where we are operating and we are targeting our ongoing throughput guidance of 55,000 tons per day. Does that answer your question?

Yes, it does. Because we are kind of getting into a bit of a circular discussion there that was somewhat frustrating, but this is much clearer. Just going over to Kumtor, very much back end weighted on the grade. I heard that you are getting into the higher grade portion of one of the cutbacks. Should we be thinking about most of a slightly better grade in Q3 and then a much better grade in Q4 as far as what’s presented to the mill?

You could expect that. We will be getting into the higher grade material within Q3 and then the entirety of Q4 will be in the higher grade, so yes.

Okay. And by higher grades, could we see it in the high-3 gram kind of level in Q4?

I would refer you to your – our guidance and that’s we will be achieving the guidance.

Okay. Over to Öksüt and I will leave it after this. Earlier on, we have had an idea of the CapEx spend for the year around the $82 million mark. A little bit of a slower start in the first half. I am just wondering whether that is still the target for the year or whether we would see some of that spend slip into 2019.

Yes. Well, we are maintaining our guidance at the moment on Öksüt. I mean, clearly as the year progresses and given the weakening in the Turkish lira, we are reevaluating, but we are maintaining our guidance at this point.

And David, it’s Scott. Just you mentioned a slower start I just want to remind everyone that we didn’t break ground until March 27. So in terms of the guidance, the $82 million of investment expenditures this year obviously the majority of it is back end weighted in the second half of this year given the March 27 groundbreaking.

Very good. Okay, I will leave it there for now. Thank you.

Thanks.

And the next question is from Trevor Turnbull with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you. I just wanted to ask a little bit more just to kind of understand the water balance at Mount Milligan, I know that you aim to recycle 100% of the processed water, but you obviously are losing a bit of it. You aren’t able to – you recycle 100%, but at the same time you are seeing the finite amount of water that you have actually go down over time. And I am just wondering kind of what is that loss rate in terms of what you use if you need 21,000 cubic meters a day and you are recycling essentially 100% of that what portion of that is getting lost that you are not actually putting back into the tailings facility?

Yes. So, the losses are 37.5% of the tons of concentrate that gets caught up in the interstitial voids within the tailings. So for example, if we run 60,000 tons a day of ore, about a third of that in terms of tons of water stays in the tailings facility and is not accessible, because it’s within the tailings voids.

Right. And you do have these, you talked about these BUTs to actually recover water from, I assume these same voids in the gravels and so forth in the dam. Is there too much of a lag time, is that why it doesn’t still net out to be kind of a stable amount of water in the facility? Is it because it takes too long to percolate down to where you can pump it back in?

Yes. There is two things. One, there is a lag time. And secondly, when the water is sitting in the pond, it’s accessible for up to 100% of the available water. When the water is in the sands and gravels, we can only bring it up at a fixed rate based on the capacity of the pumps. So I hope that’s understandable.

Right. So maybe – yes, so what kind of pumping capacity have you got to supplement what’s – in other words you are losing say a third into the gravel, but then you are clawing some of that back with pumping. To what degree are you kind of gaining on that again?

We never really go into those specifics, Trevor. I think the way we look at it is that we have got four sources of water. We have got the base under drain towers, the BUTs, as you say. We have got the groundwater access in terms of the wells. We have got the existing available water in the tailings storage facility. And then we have obviously got access to Philip’s lake, which is expiring at the end of October. I probably should also mention any precipitation that occurs as well. So, they are all of our water sources and they are adequate in terms of what we need to replace the 21,000 cubic meters of water everyday, but as we mentioned, the access to Philip’s lake that expires at the end of October and that’s why we have this big push right now on the permitting strategy looking to establish ongoing access to Philip’s lake as well as two additional sources, which is Meadows Creek and Rainbow Creek and we want that access established out to July 2020.

Right. And I understand it would certainly help to have these additional sources, but Philip’s lake in and of itself, like if you were to extend the ability to pump there beyond October that still isn’t quite enough to offset the losses in the facility ahead of 2020, is it?

Well, not by itself, but it’s one piece of the puzzle that allows us to operate at our full throughput.

Look I understand and I am not trying to be pedantic. It just seems that this is the crux of the issue. You are draining 1 million cubic meters of a finite resource and I think what David and I and everyone really wants to know is how fast are you draining that. I understand there is ways to supplement it, but I mean even Philip’s lake at 2,500, it’s slightly more than 10% of what you need. It seems like we are just trying to understand how quickly this resource is wasting away, but I understand there is multiple sources on the come, but at this point you are kind of facing a ticking clock here.

So we have 1 million cubic meters in the current TSF, the BUTs, last winter, we provided enough water from the BUTs to run one ball mill continuously. The Philip lake amendment lifts the cap. The existing Philip Lake amendment had a cap of 60 liters a second, which is 5,000 cubic meters a day. We are allowed to draw up 15% of the base flow. So, that’s why it varies. Now, we are – the amendment, the extension of the temporary permit that we have asked for takes the cap off and so we can pull 15% of the base flow and that 2,500 was a snapshot in time on that particular day. So, it varies based on the amount of water. Rainbow Creek is similar. It’s a percentage of the base flow. This percentage is meant to be protective of the environment, but both these creeks particularly in the spring flow at very high rates, so we expect to be able to pull a lot of water from them in the spring and then use – and that will go into the TSF and be available for our use. The groundwater as well, the groundwater sources we expect to contribute a fair bit of water to the overall picture as well once groundwater wells are permitted.

Yes, I appreciate that. I just guess again referencing something David had mentioned. A lot of these increasing flows with either from the creeks and from the base flow percentages, a lot of these things seem to be a bit spring melt and runoff dependent and it’s more of the concern getting to the spring, but I will leave it there. Thank you.

And the next question is from Greg Barnes with TD Securities. Please go ahead.

I am sorry about this, but it’s following up on Trevor’s comments. So if you have access to all of those sources of water heading into Q1 of 2019, can you run the mill at full capacity?

We could run the mill at our guided capacity of 55,000 tons a day, yes.

Okay. Assuming you have access to all of those different pieces of the puzzle that you have added up there.

That is correct.

Which includes the permits.

Yes.

Which includes the permit that you hope to get very soon.

Yes, exactly.

And if you don’t get the permit I know that’s obviously not something you want to contemplate, but what level can you run the mill at?

I believe we guided in the MD&A that we would have to cutback to a single ball mill and run at a reduced throughput of 30,000 tons a day without those permits.

Okay. So you can get through the winter running the mill at the 55,000 tons a day.

If we had all of those permitted water sources, yes.

Okay, thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Matthew MacPhail with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just changing gears a little bit, talking about something else at Mount Milligan, the exploration, you guys are obviously – you are drilling around the periphery and below the current reserve pit. Are any of the results you are seeing like incrementally positive to a potential revised mine plan? Like this Saddle Zone, is this something that could be brought forward and would it be an improved grade profile over the current mine plan? I know it’s still early, but what is it looking like right now?

Well, the Saddle Zone is called the Saddle Zone, because it was historically treated as a non-economic saddle between the MBX and the Southern Star zones. This current drilling that our exploration group is doing is identifying economic mineralization within the Saddle Zone that it is too early to say for sure, but it suggests to us the risk potential that we could deepen the pit and mine out the Saddle Zone and increase the ore reserve overall because of it.

And just to follow -up with that, is it looking economic because of previously not enough drilling or just new commodity price assumptions or other estimates? I am just trying to figure out if it’s a net positive or is it just a difference of assumptions and a bit more drill density?

No, this area was under drilled. And these resources or these intercepts we are picking up are new intercepts, so it’s a net positive.

Great. Thanks. That’s everything for me.

And gentlemen, there are no more questions.

Well, with that no more questions. We will thank everyone for attending the call and we will be available throughout the day for other questions. Thank you.