Greetings, and welcome to the Cherry Hill Mortgage fourth quarter 2014 earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Michael Hutchby. Please go ahead, sir.

Good afternoon. We'd like to thank you for joining us today for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation's fourth quarter 2014 conference call. In addition to this call, we have filed a press release that was distributed today and posted to the Investor Relations section of our website at www.chmireit.com. On today's call, management's prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed today. Examples of forward-looking statements include those related to interest income, financial guidance, IRRs, future expected cash flows as well as prepayment and recapture rates, delinquencies, and non-GAAP financial measures such as comprehensive income. Forward-looking statements represent management's current estimates, and Cherry Hill assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in the future. We encourage listeners to review the more detailed discussions related to these forward-looking statements contained in the company's filings with the SEC and the definitions contained in the financial presentations available on the company's website. Today's conference call is hosted by Jay Lown, President and Chief Investment Officer. Also present on the call today are, Marty Levine, the Chief Financial Officer; and Julian Evans, our Senior Portfolio Manager. And now, I will turn the call over to Jay.

Thanks, Mike, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today on our fourth quarter 2014 earnings conference call. As part of today's call, we've posted on our website the presentation that we'll touch upon throughout the call, and we'll reference specific slides where appropriate. After our prepared remarks, we will open up the call for questions. Cherry Hill achieved solid results in the fourth quarter of 2014, despite an economic environment marked by ongoing declining interest rate and lower mortgage rate. The results are a testament to the hard work of both our entire team and our strategic partner, Freedom Mortgage. Our performance is even more remarkable when you consider that on December 31 the U.S. 10-year treasury closed 86 basis point lower than at the prior yearend. The 10-year treasury fell 32 basis point in the fourth quarter alone compared to September 30. And until recently, it had continued to decline during the first quarter of 2015. Over the course of 2014, Cherry Hill book value decreased by only $0.17 or 0.8%, which given the absolute drop in interest rate speaks to the quality and positioning of our portfolio. As we look at the current interest rate environment, coupled with the global geopolitical event, we remain biased toward a higher interest environment. Consistent positive domestic economic data during the quarter has continued into 2015, and our portfolio composition in the aggregate reflects this thesis. Notable market takeaways for the quarter were a downward trend in interest rates, elevated market volatility and higher gross prepayment speeds in agency mortgage loans. As we show on Slide 5, MBS prepayment speeds have consistently increased quarter-over-quarter throughout the year, as interest rates have fallen. Accordingly, a primary focus for our team has been and continues to be minimizing the run-off of our portfolio…

Thank you, Jay. As of December 31, the RMBS portfolio stood at $416 million, as shown on Slide 10, up from $376 million at the end of the third quarter. At quarter-end, our RMBS portfolios leverage stood at 6.19x and the portfolio was evenly split between 20-year and 15-year fixed rate whole-pools and 30-year fixed rate whole pools. During the quarter, additional RMBS purchases were made in 30 year and 20 year collateral at the expense of 15 year collateral. Our allocation to 30 year collateral increased, because the fundamental valuations of 15 year collateral had become lofty. In addition, the treasury curve continue to rally as weakening global growth and deflation increased investor concern. To minimize the effect of the continuous fall in rate, we adjusted the portfolios assets and liabilities. As shown on Slide 11, loan balance stories remained a majority of the collateral composition for the RMBS portfolio at quarter-end. Due to its composition, the portfolio continue to exhibit favorable prepayment speeds, posting a weighted average 6.8% CPR for the quarter, and approximately 6% CPR for the last six months. Going forward, we would expect prepayment speeds to increase given the portfolios composition and the persistent drop in mortgage rates that occurred during the fourth quarter and the beginning of the first quarter, 2015. Despite the RMBS portfolio changes, the aggregate portfolio continues to be managed conservatively. During the quarter, the aggregate portfolio operated with a moderate leverage of 2.26x and a negative duration gap. As shown on Slide 12, we ended the quarter with an aggregate portfolio duration gap of a minus 0.91 years. Following a 200 basis point instantaneous move according to our model, our duration gap would move from a minus 0.91 years to a positive 0.52 years. The portfolios gap is driven by the composition of the RMBS portfolio, associated hedges, and the fact that 59% of the portfolios equity was comprised of Excess MSRs during the fourth quarter. I will now turn the call over to Marty Levine, who will review our fourth quarter financial result in more detail. Marty?

Thank you, Julian. As Jay stated in his opening remarks, we had another strong quarter, and continue to execute on our strategy of effectively investing in and managing residential mortgages. Net interest income was approximately $5.4 million for the fourth quarter and $20.7 million for 2014. Our Excess MSRs, RMBS and derivatives produced the combined net increase in asset value of approximately $0.4 million for the fourth quarter and a net decrease of $1.2 million for the year. Our GAAP net loss for the fourth quarter was $0.5 million or $0.07 per share. Our dividend eligible income was $3.9 million or $0.52 per share. For the full year 2014, our GAAP net income was $2.4 million or $0.31 per share, while our dividend eligible income was $2.05 per share. For the fourth quarter, our comprehensive income, which includes the mark-to-market of our held-for-sale RMBS was $4.2 million or $0.56 per share. And for the full year 2014, it was $14.0 million or $1.87 per share. As detailed in Slide 25, we used interest rate swaps and interest swaptions to mitigate the effects of increases in interest rates on a portion of our future repurchase borrowing. At the end of the fourth quarter, we held interest rate swaps, swaptions and treasury features with the combined notional amount of approximately $337 million. For GAAP purposes, we have not elected to apply hedge accounting for our interest rate derivatives. And as a result, we record the change in estimated fair value as a component of the net gain or loss on interest rate derivatives. At yearend, 59% of our equity capital is deployed in Excess MSRs. Our investment in Excess MSRs are currently unlevered, and our implied leverage ratio on the RMBS portfolio was 6.19x at yearend. Our overall leverage ratio was 2.26x at yearend. Operating expenses were $1.9 million for the quarter, of which approximately $260,000 was related to our licensing efforts and other infrastructure cost, relating to CHMI Solutions, our taxable REIT subsidiary. And as such, our total operating expense ratio as a percentage of that equity was 4.7% for the fourth quarter and 3.5% for the full year. On December 16, 2014, we declared our fourth quarter dividend of $0.51 per share, which was paid on January 27 of this year. For the full year 2014, we paid total dividends of $2.03 per share. Our goal remains to distribute regular, quarterly dividends of substantially all of our taxable income to holders of our common stock and to the extent authorized by our Board of Directors. Now, I would like to turn the call back to Jay for closing remarks.

Thanks, Marty. Our primary goal at Cherry Hill has been and continues to be aimed at delivering consistent attractive returns for shareholders. We believe that we delivered on that front in 2014. The initiatives underway today are designed to grow and diversify our business over multiple economic and interest rate environment. We'll now open up the call for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Steve DeLaney from JMP Securities.

Jake, congratulations on the acquisition, I guess, I'd like to start there. You've disclosed, you paid, I guess $7 million including the cash in the liabilities for the $700 million in UPB. I'm just curious, where there any other material assets of Aurora Financial that you'll be acquiring?

The only thing that we acquire is some receivables for the escrows related to the servicing advances, but that's it. That's about $450,000.

And will any additional employees come over into your TRS. I am just wondering whether we need to consider modeling any additional operating expenses.

The TRS will inherit the people that are currently servicing the portfolio, and eventually that will be transferred over to a sub-servicer and those people will also be transferring over to whoever -- they've been offered employment by Freedom [multiple speakers].

Yes, I'd be surprised if it was another sub-servicer other than Freedom. That was my next question.

One more thing, the only other thing that we missed is we will have a small servicing oversight group that we'll have in-house.

And my only other thing, Jay was, and Marty mentioned the 59% of equity, $94 million in Excess MSRs that's currently unlevered. And I recall looking over the third quarter transcript or the deck. You mentioned that you were exploring opportunities to leverage your Excess MSRs and in the future full MSRs. Is there any update that you could give us on the possibility of that happening?

Other than saying, we're still on discussions around that front. There is nothing I can tell you today, but we continue to look for ways to leverage both of the assets you mentioned.

Can I ask you this, are you aware of other entities leveraging those assets?

We are aware of people that are able to leverage conforming mortgage servicing rates, correct, yes. As well as some potential opportunities around from Ginnie Mae mortgage servicing rates, but we believe that we would probably play in the conforming space first.

Our next question comes from the line of Paul Miller from FBR.

This is actually Jessica Ribner for Paul. Just two quick questions. What's the pricing differential that you see between purchasing an Excess MSRs versus a whole MSR? Is that significant or is it just the ability to purchase the whole MSR kind of gives you a little bit of competitive edge in bidding?

Well, there are two things to that. One, there is a broader market for the full MSR, and so that allows us to grow and build the company both with Freedom and outside of Freedom. And so we think that the opportunities to grow are better with respect to the full MSR versus just the Excess, so that was the primary driver. And number two, we have a reason to believe that we'll be able to obtain leverage on the full MSR and that would be able to enhance the returns, so that we could meet the return hurdles.

What kind of leverage are you thinking like a-turn-and-a-half, two turn?

It's clearly nothing that would be anything close to what you see in the agency RMBS space. But in terms of what we're currently seeing, it would be somewhere between 1 and 2 turns, depending on how you define turns.

And then what's the capacity of Freedom's servicing platform?

Freedom servicing platform today is in the $50 billion in terms of absolute size. They continue to build that department out and I believe Stan is interested in growing that and potentially double the size. So the initiatives here on the Freedom side are with the intention of ultimately turning that into something up to in the neighborhood of $100 billion. So that is kind of what's happening on their end around building that department out.

Thanks. It appears we have no further questions. I will like to turn the call back over to Jay Lown for closing comments. End of Q&A

Thank you. Thanks for joining us today on the call. We look forward to updating you on our progress on the 2015 Q2 call. And have a great afternoon.

Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.