Thank you, Jay. Our aggregate investment portfolio composition is highlighted on Slide 5. And as Jay mentioned, our servicing-related investments, comprised solely of full MSRs, represented approximately 39% of our equity capital and approximately 11% of our investable assets, excluding cash at quarter end. Servicing-related assets as a percentage of equity increased 5% due to the redeployment of RMBS assets and cash into select MSR investments during the quarter. As a result, our RMBS portfolio accounted for approximately 58% of our equity, a 3% reduction from the previous quarter. As a percentage of investable assets, RMBS represented approximately 89%, excluding cash at quarter end. As of June 30, we held MSRs with a UPB of approximately $19 billion and a market value of approximately $232 million, as shown on Slide 6. Total MSR portfolio prepayment speeds ticked up during the second quarter as we traditionally see higher speeds during the spring and summer. Life-to-date, our conventional MSRs have averaged approximately 8.9% CPR, while our government MSR have averaged 10.4% CPR. As of June 30, the RMBS portfolio stood at approximately $1.8 billion, as shown on Slide 7, up from where we stood as of March 31 due to the capital raise completed in the second quarter and the subsequent deployment of proceeds into RMBS. As we have previously noted, we expect to continue to opportunistically redeploy our RMBS funds into MSRs. At quarter end, our RMBS portfolio’s 30-year securities position stood at 73%, while the 20-year and 15-year fixed-rate pools as well as shorter-duration assets represented the balance of the RMBS portfolio. In the second quarter, the RMBS portfolio continued to perform well, posting a weighted average three-month CPR of approximately 7.7%, slightly higher than the previous quarter, as shown on Slide 8. Overall, the portfolio continues to benefit from its collateral composition and continued to vest Fannie Mae aggregate prepayment speeds during the quarter. For the second quarter, we posted a 0.94% RMBS NIM versus a 1.14% NIM for the first quarter. The decrease in NIM was driven by the increased amortization costs, based upon higher prepayment speeds, rising REPO costs and the timing differential related to the redeployment of RMBS into MSRs, all of which were slightly offset by the portfolio’s collateral composition and reduced swap costs. In the near term, we continue to expect our NIM to fluctuate on increased REPO costs. During the quarter, the aggregate portfolio operated with leverage of 4.7 times and a negative duration gap. As shown on Slide 9, we ended the quarter with an aggregate portfolio duration gap of minus 1.53 years. Going forward, we expect to continue to evaluate and alter the portfolio as the year progresses. I’ll now turn the call over to Marty for our second quarter financial discussion.