Good evening, everyone and thank you for joining today’s Chewy Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2022 Earnings Call. My name is Don Tanami, the operator for today’s call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Mr. Robert LaFleur, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, the floor is now yours.

Thank you for joining us on the call today to discuss our third quarter 2022 results. Joining me today are Chewy’s CEO, Sumit Singh; and CFO, Mario Marte. Our earnings release and letter to shareholders, which were filed with the SEC earlier today, have been posted to the Investor Relations section of our website, investor.chewy.com. On our call today, we will be making forward-looking statements, including statements concerning Chewy’s future prospects, financial results, business strategies, investments, industry trends and our ability to successfully respond to business risks, including those related to inflation and its effect on the economy and our industry. Such statements are considered forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by our forward-looking statements. Reported results should not be considered an indication of future performance. Also note that the forward looking statements on this call are based on information available to us as of today’s date. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law. For further information, please refer to the risk factors and other information in Chewy’s 10-Q and 8-K filed earlier today and in our other filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K. Also, during this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP items to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are provided on our Investor Relations website and in today’s SEC filings. These non-GAAP measures are not intended as a substitute for GAAP results. Additionally, unless otherwise noted, results discussed today refer to the third quarter of 2022 and all comparisons are accordingly against the third quarter of 2021. Finally, this call in its entirety is being webcast on our Investor Relations website. A replay of this call will also be available on our IR website shortly. I’d now like to turn the call over to Sumit.

Thanks, Bob and thank you all for joining us on the call today. Building on the momentum we reported in the second quarter, Chewy’s Q3 results showed accelerating double-digit top line growth, a sequential increase in active customers, sustained gross margin expansion and solid free cash flow generation. We experienced strong demand throughout the third quarter, especially across our non-discretionary categories, which provided a solid foundation for our growth. The resilience of the underlying demand in these categories, coupled with our ability to grow customer share of wallet, again enable Chewy to outperform broader industry trends and take incremental market share. Q3 net sales were $2.53 billion, a year-over-year increase of 14.5% and a sequential acceleration from the 12.8% growth in the second quarter. Our top line results were anchored by the predictable nature of our Autoship customer sales, which grew nearly 19% to 73.3% of net sales and by rising customer engagement as measured by net sales per active customer, or NSPAC, which grew nearly 14% to $477. Digging a little deeper into our Q3 net sales, non-discretionary categories like core food and healthcare collectively made up over 83% of our net sales and were the primary growth drivers, reflecting healthy unit demand and improved in-stock levels. Within discretionary categories, hard goods showed relative improvement in Q3 with sales declining 5% year-over-year, which is a 400 basis point improvement versus the second quarter year-over-year performance. We remain confident that hard good sales will return to their growth path as the economic environment improves. Taking a longer term view, over the last 3 years, our third quarter hard good sales are up 70%, gross profit has nearly doubled and gross margin has expanded by over 400 basis points. Shifting to overall company profitability, Q3 gross margin expanded 200 basis points…

Thank you, Sumit. Appreciate the kind words and I am looking forward to a little R&R when the time comes. But until then, it is business as usual. Now, let’s talk about our third quarter results. Net sales increased 14.5% or $320 million to $2.53 billion. Growth was led by our non-discretionary consumables and healthcare categories, which collectively represented over 83% of our Q3 net sales. Driving our third quarter net sales growth was an 18.8% increase in Autoship customer sales, which reached a new high of 73.3% of net sales, a 13.8% increase in NSPAC, also a new high for the company and an active customer base of just over 20.5 million, increasing approximately 30,000 versus the second quarter and 100,000 versus last year. Moving to profitability, our third quarter gross margin expanded 200 basis points year-over-year to 28.4%. The -- approximately 100 basis points of the year-over-year improvement is a result of favorable comps against Q3 last year when global supply chain disruptions and product cost inflation adversely affected our gross margin. The balance came from continuation of the strong pricing trends that emerged last quarter and greater efficiency in outbound shipping costs, which resulted from bigger basket sizes and the favorable progress we have made in our supply chain and logistics initiatives. Continuing on to OpEx, SG&A, which includes all fulfillment and customer service costs, credit card processing fees, corporate overhead and share-based compensation, totaled $543.5 million in the third quarter or 21.5% of net sales compared to 21.1% in the third quarter of 2021. Excluding share-based compensation, SG&A totaled $497.4 million or 19.6% of net sales. This is an improvement of 60 basis points compared to the third quarter of 2021 and was flat on a sequential basis. As we shared previously, we expected to begin…

Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Doug Anmuth with JPMorgan. Sir, the floor is yours.

Thank you. Thank you for taking the questions. I have two. Just I guess, first on the 4Q revenue. Can you just talk about the deceleration versus 3Q and if there is anything in particular driving that or anything that you’re seeing in terms of trends quarter-to-date or during the holidays? And then second, the accelerated scaling of SG&A expenses. Where do you think you’re seeing the biggest gains across warehouses and automation and just overall logistics? Thank you.

Hey, Doug, it’s Mario. I’ll start off with the Q4 guidance. So as you’ve heard us say before, our guidance doesn’t anticipate to take into consideration all the data that we have as of right now, when we look at the fourth quarter, we’re considering the fact that hard goods seem to make a bigger piece of the – of sales usually in the fourth quarter. Seasonally, Q4 tends to show a little more heavily towards hard goods given the holidays. And while we saw some demand firming up in the – between Q2 and Q3 generally speaking, demand for that category remains relatively soft compared to non-discretionary demand in things like consumables and healthcare. And it’s those headwinds produced by that softer discretionary demand that’s likely to keep net sales growth rates below what we saw, for example, in Q3. Also recall that last year, Q4, we had a bit of a boost from the Omicron search in December and January. So that’s an impact of higher comps last year regarding Omicron. Now that all said, look, the midpoint of the fourth quarter guidance is still it suggests over $250 million increase year-over-year and the quarter is off to a good start. And if you look at the full year, you see that our guidance now for full year 2022 is about 13% growth over $1.1 billion growth in dollar terms year-over-year and more than double the revenue over the last 3 years.

Hey, Doug, this is Sumit. I’ll take the second part of the question. You said what’s contributing to accelerated SG&A. You also said logistics. I’ll take both logistics initiatives are rolling up through gross margin, but I’ll explain as I kind of go through. On the SG&A scaling, so things that are in play here. One, the benefits that we’re getting from automation, which we rolled out a couple of years ago are really starting to come through now. So if you heard me talk about kind of a physics analogy in the past where I said there is a lot of potential energy conserved in the system, which once we start unlocking turns into kinetic energy and that’s kind of what you’re seeing flow through. So basically, the two fulfillment tenders that we launched last year are fully ramped. We pushed nearly third of our volume or just a little under 30% of our volume through that network. We know the third one is still ramping and we realized half of our 120 basis point leverage to the accelerated ramp of the fulfillment centers. The ramp is also helped by the fact that our inventory positioning is improving both as a result of our work and as a result of improved in-stock levels. And so when you do that, you actually create density in the fulfillment centers that allows you to be more productive and the labor situation has been fairly stable. So when you put all of that together, it allows us to leverage our network in a manner that we essentially planned it or built it to begin with. So that’s the fulfillment center portion. Underneath of that, we’re also getting operating leverage as a result of higher basket sizes. And as incremental volume flows through, that’s…

Great. Thank you, both. Appreciate that.

Sure.

Thank you for your question, sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Mark Mahaney with Evercore. Sir, the floor is now yours.

Okay, thank you. Let me try two questions. First, the sponsored ad revenue opportunity, have you sized the TAM before? And just talk about the which kind of advertisers you would expect to bring on to the platform? And then in terms of the net active customers, this growth you had this quarter after two quarters of decline. And I know there is a factor here, which is kind of moving beyond the COVID cohort a little bit. Should the interpretation be that you’ve now kind of at the end of that tunnel and that you’re back to kind of more normalized churn levels across the customer base and the gross adds kind of stay high that we should now expect a consistently ongoing growth in net active customers? Thank you.

Hey, Mark, I’ll take the first one. Mario will take the second one. So on sponsored ad, since it’s just launched and still in beta, we haven’t fully kind of shared the financial benefits. The way we would think about it is we compare ourselves to other companies that run single category or sponsored ads in single category. So I think that would become a reference. And then we would also consider the power of the Autoship program that allows us to build repeat purchase and loyalty into brands that allows us kind of an ROI, which is just different and more powerful than we’ve seen in the industry. So you put those two together, the type of products that kind of lends itself to consumables, healthcare, all products where you can build loyalty, whether it’s search demand, whether it’s direct index on the website. And we’ve seen basically great response from partners from that standpoint right now. So we’re prioritizing those too.

Hey, Mark, on your second question about active customer growth, in the third quarter, you saw that we did increase the active customer account by about 30,000 and up about 100,000 year-over-year. That was in line with our expectations. The increase really is a result of a small uptick in the number of gross customer adds in the quarter and a small reduction in the number of churn customers. As to your point, we continue to lapse the very large COVID era cohorts that we acquired in ‘20 and ‘21. You know that, obviously, we don’t guide to active customers just as we don’t guide to NASPAC. But that said, our expectations for active customer growth going into the fourth quarter, remain generally consistent with what we said on prior calls. And that’s all reflected in the guidance we provided for sales and the like.

Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you, Mario. And Mario, congratulations on 8 years of great success in execution. So wishing you all the best.

Thank you, Mark.

Thank you for your question, sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Anna Andreeva with Needham & Company. Ma’am, the floor is yours.

Great. Thank you so much. Good afternoon, guys and congrats great results. Two quick questions from us. On higher pricing, I know you have more of a portfolio approach towards managing that. Just any initial thoughts on how we should think about your price versus unit relationship into ‘23. And as you start lapping the price increases implemented this year? And then secondly, on advertising, it’s fluctuated in the last couple of quarters. Can you talk about what’s implied for advertising for the fourth quarter? And should we think the 5% to 7% range is still the right level for the business as we look out? Thank you.

Hi, Anna. This is Sumit. I’ll start, and if Mario has to add anything you’ll jump in here. So first of all, pricing and unit growth contributed about equally to sales in Q3. We grew pricing, but we also grew units meaningfully as we move through Q3. And in terms of lapping next year, so one, obviously, this year, we’ve seen increasingly elevated pricing as we moved from Q1 through Q3. And so the first half of year, there is still positive favorable comps to be lapped. So that’s one. Number two, we are expecting incremental costs, as we’ve shared in the previous calls, we’re expecting incremental cost and therefore, more inflation to be passed through into the industry as we enter 2023. So we believe that’s how the pricing environment would look like as we get out of Q4 into the first half of 2023. And then, of course, in a similar manner where we’re growing units which is actually structurally different than how industry growth occurred in Q3. In Q3, industry growth occurred primarily on the back of price. But at Chewy grew units and price. We expect to do that in Q3 in ‘23 as well.

Yes. Anna, to your second part of the question on marketing spend, we were in the Q4 marketing as a percent of net sales to be similar to Q3 and for the year to be in that 6% to 7% range, given where we are year-to-date.

Thank you for your questions. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Brian Fitzgerald with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Thanks, guys. 30% of volume handled by the automated FCs. Any update or how should we frame up the cost savings that you realized from that? And then as you ramp up to automation and efficiency and then you drive these logistics improvements across the network it drives a better user experience, right? And so have you seen anything in terms of positive impact on engagement, order frequency NASPAC as a direct result of what you’re doing to the network?

Hey, Brian, this is Sumit. So the improvement in how do we think about potential there. So I think you were asking a cost question. We’ve seen favorability to somewhere between 18% and 20%. So the volume fulfilled out of the 2G network was roughly 18% to 20% cheaper than the volume that we fulfilled from our first one legacy 1G network. And two, we’re still ramping volume into the third fulfillment center. So there is incremental volume leverage that we expect to gain, and we’re still continuing to scale our costs. So there is incremental productivity improvement that we would expect from our network. So all positive story there. In terms of the impact that we’ve seen we have. I mean, we’ve seen an acceleration both in – it’s reflected in the gross adds number. It’s also reflected in the reactivation number as we’ve improved both our inventory positioning and as we’ve improved CX. This is not an exact science. So getting down to specific numbers is a little bit hard, but you can clearly see it in the way that our network plays out and our ownership rates, both kind of net and gross work out there, so, yes.

And Brian, if I can add one more thing meter, if you look at where we are today, we have – you saw the numbers we recounted we reported in terms of the benefit in SG&A from these three FCs. And as a reminder, Reno just opened more or less at the end of second quarter. So it’s still ramping. So there is three FCs, one of which is ramping out of 13. And over the next year or a year, 18 months, we’re going to see a couple of more FCs open up that are also automated. So these are layers of profitability, as we said before, as we get more and more of our volume through these automated facilities over time.

Brian, if you add these up, like Reno has several basis points of improvements to give when it ramps. The next two, we size to that 30 to 50 basis points also said there is 20 to 30 basis points of utilization capacity, which is operating leverage, certainly get released. So when you add that kind of improvement, along with the fact that we continue to push more volume and expect lower cost we’re satisfied with the journey so far. there is more to come.

Awesome. Sumit and Mario, thank you.

Thanks, Brian.

Thanks, Brian.

Thank you for your questions, sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Corey Grady with Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. I wanted to follow-up on the pricing you’re talking about in 2023. Can you say more about what you’re hearing from brands and commodity costs and additional pricing and what you’re expecting in terms of the magnitude of pricing next year? And then on hard goods, so as we come off the COVID adoption cycle and sort of think about a potential recession in 2023, how are you thinking about a recovery in that segment? And what are the leading indicators you would look at to gauge recovery and hard good demand? Thanks.

Sure, sure, sure. So pricing conversations, it’s early to define or to put a range on the magnitude. So perhaps we could discuss that on the next earnings call when we have a little more clarity when we meet in March. We are expecting pricing to start rolling through in the Q1 time frame. So this will actually become more clear as we kind of wrap up the year and get into next year. So far, we’re not hearing of multiple rounds of increase. But then again, as we get more information, we will definitely pass that on. If you look at 2022, we’ve had four rounds of cost increases over the last 15 months. starting from Q3 of 2021 through Q3 of 2022. We don’t expect multiple rounds of cost increases coming, but there is certainly incremental cost that needs to pass through the system first half of next year. Your second question on hard goods, the inputs that are driving the hard goods lag essentially are a couple here. One is it’s tied directly to the consumer’s mindset to inflation pressures and consumer mindset to pullback spending from discretionary categories. Number two is refresh cycles on hard goods are typically longer. So for example, if you recall the last 2 years, every bed in America pretty much got let’s say, a bad refresh, all – every new puppy got to create, et cetera. And so these refresh cycles are generally 12 to 15 months long, and they don’t get as refreshed as quickly refreshed as toys would, for example. So there is a little bit of that, we have to lapse as we play the kind of the timescale here. And the third one is pet household formation. When you look at these options on Lanquishman, they're basically flat to very slightly down from a year-over-year perspective. So as petrol household formation returns to normalcy, which again is tied back to the inflationary environment, as these inputs correct themselves, we expect hard goods growth to return to normal.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question, sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Lee Horowitz with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.

Great. Thanks for the question. Maybe another one on NASPAC, for the quarter, can you help us unpack a bit how much of the NASPAC work you saw in the quarter was from share of wallet gains versus just general inflationary path and the pricing environment? And then I know we will have this conversation next quarter again. But just at a high level, when you think about the path forward for NASPAC growth next year, we will have some pricing pass-through, but you’re obviously comping it’s a big inflationary year and don’t necessarily have, say, a big ‘22 cohort that’s going to be in that, call it, rapid paces NASPAC next year. So how are you thinking about the inputs for NASPAC growth next year? Thanks so much.

This is Mario. I’ll take that one. I can go on for a while on this answer. But look, let me kind of give – purpose there was a couple of things, as we mentioned in the prepared remarks, our NASPAC did reach another all-time high in the third quarter at $477. If you take that number back to Q1 2020, that’s a 34% increase over the last couple of years, so significant increase in grain of share of wallet there. The other thing is from a spending perspective, if you’re just comparing to customers that have been with us for a long time versus more recent customers. The customers we added during the last couple of years they are displaying similar spending patterns to customers we acquired back to the pandemic. And what that simply means is that they spend more the longer they stay with us. We’ve seen that for several years. In fact, we’ve seen it back to the first cohort as we projected out to today. And I mean the first cover back in 2011 to today. Also consider that our current NASPAC is, as I said, about $477. And if you look at our oldest cohorts 11, 12, 13, they are spending about $1,000 a year with us. Add that to the fact that 60% of customers today have been with us for three years or less. So, think about what that means, there is this long curve that takes you from first year about $150, $200 to about $1,000. And on average, today, our cohort is -- our cohorts are fairly young on a weighted basis, and the average NASPAC is $477. So, there is a tremendous amount of upside potential to how much more share of wallet we can gain over time from those customers. Of course, we help drive NASPAC growth by adding new product categories like healthcare. We expand our catalog. Now we have over 100,000 products in our catalog. And we also make it easier to – for customers to discover product and drive more cross-category shopping, so all of these things that we are doing to continue to gain that share of wallet. But again, if you look back at over the years, cohort-after-cohort, they have these nice long curves as they stay, they spend more with us, the longer they stay with us. Sumit, anything you want to add there?

Yes. I think Mario hit it. If you look at the business unit level, we have several growth factors that are still growing to deliver scale and contribute to positive NASPAC development. I mean if you look at healthcare, that’s a rapidly developing $40 billion TAM and less than 15%, 20% of our customers are active customers. And when you look at private label, there is an opportunity to ramp that up. We just launched Fresh & Prepared category, which is a high NASPAC driver in sales. Our premium and specialty businesses have plenty of runway in front of them. On top of this, our B2C and B2B services, such as telehealth or connect with event compounding, Practice Hub, shelters, pet insurance. They all remain in nascent stages and early stages. And then on top of that, new initiatives such as sponsored ads, etcetera, are all – these are all early kind of vectors that we believe can really compound the value proposition that we deliver and capture kind of the full life cycle output, offer customers engagement with our platform. So, we are super bullish about this.

Very helpful. Thanks so much.

Sure.

Thank you for your questions sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Steve Forbes with Guggenheim. Your line is now open.

[Indiscernible] on for Steve Forbes. Just a quick question on automated FCs, I see you mentioned 30% of the volume is shipped from automated. Any color you can give us on what that might look like at maturity? And any color you can give on additional investments either in Reno or additional facilities into 2023? Thank you.

So, in terms of additional investments, we have talked about launching two new fulfillment centers, which will launch in the next 12 months to 15 months. So, one will definitely hit ‘23, one might hit towards the end of ‘23, perhaps early ‘24. But in the next 12 months to 15 months, we have shared with you two more fulfillment center launches, and both of them are automated. In terms of volume entitlement, of course, by the nature of the fact that we would have at that point, 15 fulfillment centers and 5 of the 15 would be automated linearly, we would say 30% of the volume, but we are already there. So, what you can tell is that we are densifying the region as much as possible to be able to shift or place these fulfillment centers closer to customers and then pack them up with as much volume as possible. If you recall in one of the previous scripts, we have said we expect fixed output – throughput per square foot to improve 25% is the efficiency that these buildings are giving us at overall 30% improvement in kind of full CPU or full cost per unit measure. And so our goal will be to push as much volume as possible. The constraint there is optimally locating inventory, and of course, corresponding to normal demand distribution that exists in the country. So, more to come as we continue to scale this.

Thank you for your question sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Eric Sheridan with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Thanks so much for taking the questions. And maybe a two-parter, if I can, compared to what you have seen historically, is there any way to frame or quantify what you are embedding in the forward guidance for promotional activity or competitive intensity in the next quarter over the holiday period versus what you have seen historically? And is there any sense that you might see a different bent to competition in the industry given some of the inflation dynamics and consumer wallet dynamics out there broadly? Thanks so much for the color.

Eric, compared to Q3, the promotional environment is weighted in Q4, this is normal seasonal pattern we see every year heading into the holidays. But within the context of Q4 itself, we believe the promotional environment remains rational and more or less in line with what we have seen in previous holiday periods. And looking forward, we don’t expect the levels of promotions will intensify beyond the current levels that we are seeing. On your second question, we aren’t – do we expect competitors to add differently given inflation. The fact that the industry, primarily on the consumables and healthcare side is mapped, I think it allows a [Technical Difficulty] discipline in a market. And secondly, supply chains haven’t yet fully recovered. So, in stock positions are certainly improving, but they are not back to normal to be able to expect hyperactivity. And then third, when you look at hard goods sales that are generally the elastic category, currently, there isn’t much elasticity to be driven given the consumers’ mindset plus the inventory there, it doesn’t – like when you look at the contribution from a contribution point of view, it makes up about 15% of our overall sales. So, we are a little more insured there from a spend point of view.

Thank you for your question sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Dylan Carden with William Blair. Your line is now open.

Thanks a lot. I guess you guys could decide today to provide any detail on the other revenue line item. I know there is a couple of moving parts there, particularly if you are seeing trade down or any benefit more broadly in the last several quarters in the private label space? And any update on the partnerships with vets or Practice Hub sort of how pharmaceuticals are trending? Thanks.

Hi Dylan, this is Mario. I will take the first part of that. So, as you know, we don’t desegregate that other line item, other revenue item. But in there, we include not only our pharmacy, but also our private – all of our proprietary brand sales specialty, meaning anything that is non-cat type of product, meaning other peptides. As you would expect, that you saw in the hard goods, I will give you context rather than specific numbers. But as you saw in hard goods, though that was an improvement quarter-over-quarter in the terms of decline, a lot of our sales in the private brand space are going to be hard goods. So, just like we sell with third-party or national brands hard goods declined year-over-year. You would have expected something similar on the private brands and other thing. Our healthcare offerings, our pharmacy especially continues to perform really well and to grow faster than the rest of the business. So, I will say that.

And then we have not seen trade downs. I think that was part of your question. Your second part of the question was on Practice Hub updates or wet initiatives. Look, we are pleased with the update. Practice Hub scale is up 30% quarter-over-quarter from the last time we met you. So, we continue to deepen our presence, our engagement and our penetration with the vets and in a positively oriented manner. Connect with a vet continues to scale well. We are pleased with insurance. We are very early in insurance. So, these are generally arcs that are certainly beyond the 1-year mark. These are verticals that we think of in terms of 3-year increments, just as we did pharmacy when we launched it back in middle of 2018, ‘19 timeframe. So – but overall, we are pleased with the way that we are building out the healthcare ecosystem, and we are bullish about our place in this.

Thanks a lot guys.

Thank you for your question sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Justin Kleber with Baird. Your line is now open.

Hey, good evening. Thanks guys. Just a follow-up to the question on promotions. If we look at gross margin, you are going to end this year about four points above ‘19. Can you help us understand how much margin has benefited over these past 3 years from this more benign promotional backdrop? Just so we can assess what a normalization in the environment could mean if it does happen for gross margins in ‘23 and beyond?

It’s immaterial to the gross margin progress that we are showing. Any context to add, Mario?

Yes. No, I think that’s exactly right. I think it’s de minimis and I would say where you see the gross margin improvement over time is everything we have talked about. It is getting into or expanding our higher-margin categories, healthcare, hard goods. It is the embedded business getting bigger, gaining the scale. It is gain sharing the benefits across our entire vendor supply and inbound and outbound, it is all those drivers there, but not promotional environment doesn’t really affect it not materially here.

Okay. I guess and why the big step down implied in 4Q on gross margin, it’s – there is always a promotional holiday, right? So, I guess it sounds like there is not a year-over-year change in promotions that you are anticipating this holiday. So, if it’s not been a big benefit, I guess I am trying to understand why the step down in margin here in 4Q relative to the 28.4 in 3Q?

Sequentially, I mean margins of course, Q4 is a seasonal period. So, you would expect increased promotional activity. And we are seeing that. We have seen increased promotional activity as we move sequentially out of Q3 into Q4. On an annual basis, we will be stronger this quarter relative to last quarter, relative to the same quarter last year.

Yes. So, between that and the peak surcharges that are happening during the holidays, and that’s expected, we wouldn’t have seen that in the third quarter. We would see it more in the fourth quarter. So, there are different drivers there, exactly. Now, I think maybe the other part of your question you didn’t ask, and I will answer it anyways was, if you look at what we are looking at for the full year, we came into this year expecting to be basically we said broadly in line. We expect it to be more or less flat year-over-year on a full year basis. And now we are guiding to a 90 basis point to 100 basis point improvement in end gross margin. So, we are seeing certainly a lift there as we go through the year.

Got it. And just an unrelated question, you mentioned price – another round of, I guess cost increases and therefore, price increases that need to be pushed in the system. If we eventually enter a period of deflation as input costs decline, how do you guys think about the ability to sustain all this pricing that’s been taken here over the past few years, particularly in the consumables category? Thank you.

Yes, we think pricing will sustain because most of the pricing is getting translated or applied in the industry through MAP pricing and MAP prices are generally sticky. So, you see less variability and therefore more stability at the same time. So, we expect these to be sticky.

Alright. Got it. Thank you both. Best of luck in the holidays.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Chris Bottiglieri from BNP Paribas. Your line is now open.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking the question. You made a small bolt-on acquisition of PetaByte Technologies in November. Can you talk more about what capabilities this gives you and how it fits into your broader ambitions in the healthcare space?

Yes. Sure. So, PetaByte is a relatively small acquisition of a cloud-based provider of technology solutions for the vet sector that we completed in November. We are excited to welcome the PetaByte team into the Chewy family. And we see opportunities – significant opportunities associated with adding PetaByte’s technology to our broader portfolio of healthcare service offerings. And today, there is not much more to comment because we are – it’s early stages and work has just begun, but we look forward to sharing more with you in the quarters to come.

Got it. Okay. Thanks. And then I guess the next question is, can you just talk more about the – I guess, the basket size is what you are seeing there? Are you seeing your basket size has grown. It sounds like discretionary is under pressure. So, it’s like you are adding more discretionary. What’s driving the bigger basket sizes, are people trading into bigger package sizes in order to save more money per unit is inflation, or is this just – are you finding more ways to attach like healthcare products and stuff like that, and that’s what’s driving?

It’s a combination of pricing strength and our complementary growth on the healthcare side. We have come up with several different complementary products to add to the simple consumables and supplies purchase. So, as attach rates for highly discretionary categories such as toys, perhaps is near-term impacted, right. The attach for pharma drugs, other products such as insurance, telehealth, these are all additive to the basket size. Autoships have higher basket sizes than non-order ship orders and our ownership percent has continued to increase. So, that’s the contributor in improving basket sizes as well. But this is all in place.

Got it. Okay. Thank you.

Thank you for your question sir. Our next line of questions comes from the line of Seth Basham. Your line is now open sir.

Thanks a lot and good afternoon. My question is on customer acquisition costs. You know that gross customer adds increased 6% sequentially, while your advertising and marketing expense increased 23% sequentially. So, your tax was up sharply, were your LTV expectations on customizations changed that much from the last quarter to this quarter to maintain ROI expectations on new customers?

Hey Seth, this is Mario. I will start off and maybe Sumit can cover something. The customer, you said that our gross adds were up 6% quarter-over-quarter. So, expand on that one, I am trying to make sure that I answer your question correctly.

I believe that’s what you said in the script and in the shareholders letter?

Yes, the gross adds, that is both new customers and customer reactivations. So, it is a combination of both customers that are lapsed and coming back and also gross adds. I wouldn’t try to tie the two directly together. We have gotten this question somewhat similar before on the active customer count increase and comparing that to investments in marketing. But I would say it’s – you have to sort of disconnect the two. They are not – they shouldn’t be tightly connected that way.

This is Sumit. We are continuing to see NASPAC growth, LTV growth. So, when you look at Q3, there were multiple areas that the spend actually went in – on top of the increased CPC or increased ad cost that we see in Q3, which you typically do coming out of a lull in Q2 as you gain as everybody tries to gain kind of mind share of the consumer in a current environment where the consumer pool remains shallow. So, CPCs have continued to increase. But beyond that, we saw opportunities to invest in three different areas where we did. First is customer development, focused on increasing engagement and expanding NASPAC. So, that was part of our investment. Number two, reactivating previously churned customers. And in Q3, we saw a double-digit year-over-year increase in customer reactivation. And then three, there is always some experimentation and testing that we are doing with new channels that are designed to drive broader reach and awareness of the Chewy brand and positioning that right in front of the holiday season as we gain more traction with customers is just a prudent thing to do. So, all-in-all, we are – we – in the way that we spent the money, we kept it within the 5% to 7% range that we have talked about before, and we were satisfied with the outcome here.

Got it. Okay. So, your TAC was up sequentially, but in line with expectations to maintain ROI and the customers you acquired in this quarter relative to last?

That’s right. Yes.

Thank you.

Thank you for your question sir. I would now like to pass the call back to Mr. Sumit Singh for any closing remarks.

Thank you all for joining us. Happy holidays and a happy New Year.

And with that, we will conclude today’s Chewy third quarter fiscal year 2022 earnings call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.