Welcome to the Ciena Corporation Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Lorraine, and I’ll be your operator for today’s call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over Mr. Gregg Lampf, VP of Investor Relations. Gregg Lampf, you may begin.

Thank you, Lorraine. Good morning. And welcome to Ciena’s 2015 second quarter review. With me today is Gary Smith, CEO and President; Jim Moylan, CFO; and François Locoh-Donou, Senior Vice President of our Global Products Group. This morning’s press release is available on National Business wire and ciena.com. We also will posted to the Investor section of ciena.com an accompanying Investor Presentation, including certain highlighted items from this quarter being discussed today, as well as our historical results. In our prepared remarks today, Gary will discuss management’s view on the market and our progress in the quarter, and Jim will provide some color on our results and provide guidance. We will then open up the call to questions from the sell-side analysts, taking one question per person with follow-ups as time allows. Before turning the call over to Gary, I’ll remind you that during this call, we will be making certain forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions regarding the company, that include risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the statements discussed today. These statements should be viewed in the context of the risk factors detailed in our most recent 10-Q filing and in the context of the transaction-related cautionary statements included in our May 4th press release announcing Ciena’s Intention to Acquire Cyan. Our 10-K is required to be filed with the SEC by June 11th, and we expect to file by that date. Ciena assumes no obligation to update the information discussed in this conference call, whether as a result of new information, future results or otherwise. Today’s discussion includes certain adjusted or non-GAAP measures of Ciena’s results of operations. A detailed reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to our GAAP results is included in today’s press release available on ciena.com. This call is being recorded and will be available for replay from the Investor section of our website. Gary?

Thank you, Gregg, and good morning, everyone. For sometime now, we have been stressing the importance of two related dynamics in the market. The first is the shift to on-demand consumption of network resources and the second is this shift has significant implications to both the service provider and web-scale communities. In fact, this shift is blurring the lines between these sets of buyers as they become increasingly interdependent. Our outstanding second quarter reflect Ciena’s industry-leading ability to address these market dynamics. I think it also underscores the importance of having established trusted relationships with both Tier 1 service providers and global web-scale providers as they build open on-demand network environments. We have purpose built a broad based and increasingly profitable business, specifically to address this market development. Ciena’s continued diversification, steadily improving operating leverage and overall financial performance demonstrate our successful execution of this strategy. Accordingly, Q2 revenue grew 11% over the second quarter of last year, roughly doubling the estimated growth rate for the overall general market. We also booked record order volume in the quarter and at 11% our adjusted operating margin is nearly twice as high as it was in a year ago period. All of this continued progress illustrates both the strategic value of our portfolio and the effectiveness of our operating model. Ciena’s sustain momentum is being driven by the continued adoption of our open OPn architecture, which is designed to facilitate the shift to on-demand networking for applications ranging from service providers, next-gen metro builds to data center interconnect applications for web-scale and service providers alike. As the only player with the complete next-gen portfolio that covers edge, metro, long-haul and data center interconnect, we are seeing broad strength across our markets. For example, I'm pleased to announce that we signed another top…

Thank you, Gary. Good morning, everyone. I'll start by underscoring Gary statement that Q2 was an outstanding quarter for Ciena, with excellent overall financial performance and continued forward momentum. But before I get to the numbers, I’d like to highlight some data points that illustrate our continued diversification. Non-telco customers represented 33% of our business in Q2, with MSOs as a particular strength. We recorded our best ever quarter with two major cable players and our best ever MSO revenue performance overall, driven in part by continued growth of demand for Ethernet business services. Web-scale customers continued to be an important growth driver for Ciena. We added a top five web-scale provider in the quarter and more than 80% of our 200 gig shipments went to web-scale customers. Our 8700 Packetwave Platform, which expands our opportunity in data center and metro networking now has 15 customers compared to 12 last quarter and we shipped 26% more total packet capacity this quarter versus Q2 2014. Our coherent optical business continues to grow and is now well beyond a $1 billion annual run rate. We now have 209 total customers for coherent optics, 158 of which are 100 gig customers and Converged Packet Optical revenue in Q2 is up more than 20% year-over-year. In metro applications specifically, Dell'Oro recently named Ciena as number one in global metro market share, surpassing Huawei in this important and growing market. Turning now to our financial performance. We believe our second quarter results continued to show the momentum that we built in the market for the past few years. Revenue came in at $622 million, driven by the non-telco customers and overall strength in North America. At 44.4% Q2's gross margin reflects a strong quarter for services and our product mix that included a higher proportion…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Mark Sue from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good morning, gentlemen. And it’s good to see the operating margin guidance increase. At a high level as you increase your on-demand software centric network solutions and you increase your customer diversification, are you able to price your products more at a premium than in the past? In the past it was cost and then some profit above that, are the discussions becoming increasingly strategic with your customers as you diversify and furthermore can you give you us an update on WaveLogic and how that can further improve your gross margins overtime?

Hi, Mark. What I sort of summarize the sort of customer engagements and I think you said it, well, it is much more strategic. I think its back to this sort of on-demand positioning with our customers. We’re very often involved in the marketing of their services, so it’s more seen about a revenue generation than an actual cost or expense and it’s linked increasingly to the success of their business and that in turn with the intelligence we were putting into the network is more software orientated across the portfolio. So if you look at our improvements in gross margin over the last couple of years, it’s really about the increase software capability that we have across the platforms and subscription software, which is up in services. In cost reductions, which is really things about WaveLogic technology, which is predominantly software essentially. So all of those things improve our ability to drive value into out customers and therefore from a pricing point of view very simplistically we have more flexibility and power. From a WaveLogic point of view…

Okay.

François, do you want to touch on the capabilities of that going forward? François Locoh-Donou: Yeah. So, Mark, as we continue to improve the performance of our coherent engine, what we’re seeing is an ability to reduce our cost for an equivalent amount of capacity. We’re able to reduce our cost and power per bit consumption, which does help our gross margins. But in addition, we’re able to differentiate on performance. And one of the things that we have seen over the last couple of years with SDN and the large number of applications running on optical networks is the performance and scalability of optical networks and continuous to be mission critical and perhaps is even more important than it was before. And therefore, the performance of WaveLogic 3 and the differentiation that it creates for us in the marketplace is another factor of positive trends towards our gross margin.

Thank you, Mark.

Thank you. Good luck, gentlemen.

Thanks, Mark.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Kent Schofield from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi. This is actually Doug Clark on behalf of Kent. I wanted to ask about the web-scale customer traction, you announced one major customer in the quarter and also launched Waveserver. I wondering how Waveserver works into that strategy and if you see that as an opportunity to expand into additional accounts from here?

Yeah. I’ll take that Doug. So, yes, absolutely, Waveserver is a great fit into the data center interconnect market. This is a market where we have been deploying 6,500 and as Gary said, we are leaders number one in the global data center interconnect market. But Waveserver really extends our opportunity because it allows us to deploy in smaller data centers than we’ve had before and also potentially with Tier 2 internet content providers. Really the uniqueness and differentiation in Waveserver relative to anything we have seen in the marketplace is two-fold. Number one, it provides just more compactness and scalability and cost per bit performance than anything that’s been done before. And number two, I think, that’s the piece that has been, I think, missed in general is that internet content providers really are obsessed with automation and software automation. And with Waveserver, we’ve also launched what we’ve called an Emulation Cloud that allows Ethernet content providers to effectively stimulate their implementations or clusters of nodes and allows them to operationalize the technology a lot faster. So Waveserver really for us is a milestone and a great opportunity to extend our presence in the data center market.

The other thing I would like to point out we don’t want people to lose sight of the fact that although we have highlighted in this quarter that we won another of the top 5 web-scale customers. We serve a broad range of web-scale customers, including companies like Equinix and Digital Realty customers that we won because of our capability, and that’s just the direct sales. We also sell them capacity thorough our carrier customers online, a managed service provider basis which effectively sort of doubles the direct sales that we have. So it’s a very important market for us, very strategic. We are well-positioned. And I think we will continue to do very well in that market.

Great. Thanks. That’s good detail. And then one quick follow-up as well. The segment mix was certainly strong towards converged packet-optical. Wondering if you can talk through the dynamics of the relative product segments?

Yes. Doug, as you’ve followed us over the years, I think we should be careful not to trendline the results of any one particular quarter in any product set or any geography. What you want to look at is the progress over time in the geographies and across the product set. So we feel great about what happened in converged packet-optical in the quarter. We’ve done very well in packet networking over the past few years. And I think both of those will continue to grow over time.

Thank you, Doug.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Rod Hall of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I guess my main question, Gary I wanted to go back to your commentary around AT&T. We know that there's an RFP out for the 100 gig metro upgrade. I just wonder if -- are your comments suggesting that you guys have a significant position in that RFP, have they made any decisions yet? Can you just give us kind of an update on what’s going on with that particular RFP? And then I have a follow-up.

Rod, without getting into sort of too much sort of detail and sort of specific customers, we are deploying converged metro with AT&T and that was included in our revenues for this quarter. And we see a good rollout of that over the coming years. So I can’t comment on a particular RFP, but we’re actually rolling out the metro as we speak.

Okay. And that includes a 100 gig technology I assume Gary?

Correct.

Okay. The other thing I wanted to just maybe ask Jim about a couple points on the margin. One is, the OpEx is just a touch higher than we expect. You guys are guiding for full year OpEx in line with your prior commentary. Anything we ought to know about in terms of the puts and takes around the OpEx? And then also while we are on the margin topic, could you guys just talk a little bit about the pricing environment? The gross margins seem very strong here. Thanks.

Yes. On the OpEx side, there is going to be some quarterly fluctuation on our OpEx driven largely by what's happening within our R&D investment envelope and timing associated with the release of new products, the need for spending just prior to that, that sort of thing. So we’re still very comfortable with what we said about OpEx for the year, which is approximately $205 million on average per quarter, which would get you to a number of about $820 million for the year. We still feel very good about that. There will be some quarterly movements as we said, but confident we will be able to hold our OpEx to that range.

Rod, on the overall sort of pricing, I’d say as we see this sort of shift to on-demand, which is really around service creation as opposed to being perceived as an infrastructure pure cost, the price sensitivity around that gets less. And increasingly, as you’re adding value into that customer base, it is more software-center. So the game is changing over the last couple of years. Yes, it's about price per bit and transporting bits sufficiently absolutely and we do that better than anybody else. But increasingly it’s about software content across the portfolio to deliver us an on-demand environment and that gives us opportunity to increase our margins, you're seeing that trend, we have made good progress and I think we will continue to do so.

Great. Thanks guys.

If you take our guidance for the second half of a year for gross margin and add it to what we gave in the first half, you will see that we had a very nice progression in gross margin. We expect a very nice progression in gross margin in 2015 from 2014. And that’s because of a lot of things, it’s because of software content, it’s because that many of the places and customers in which we were attacking, and we were building out networks are now getting into more mature phases and we are building out more line cards into these projects. Also our services margin has improved and that has also to do with software content. We saw software subscription and that is included in our services revenue. So for all of those reasons we feel very good not only about this year’s gross margin but about the progress that we expect to make going forward.

Okay.

Thanks, Jim.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Michael Genovese from MKM Partners. Please go ahead.

Okay. Great. Thanks a lot. Hey, I just wanted to ask about the [Technical Difficulty] strong as they were in the quarter but the sequential guidance only being up slightly, if you could just comment on that? Is that taking a conservative view after a very strong quarter or is that because of a tough cable comp, like what is going on with the sequential guidance?

We’ve always said, Mike, as you know, that quarter-to-quarter movements can be a little bit distracting and not very indicative of our forward drivers. We feel really good about what we are going to do in the second half of this year. We have tried to make a call for the third quarter and for the full year that reasonably reflects what we think is going to happen. So I -- that's all I’ll say about it, feel great about what’s going on in the business, feel great about future progress going forward.

That is fair enough. And just one clarification then on the MSO comment with, sorry, web-scale comment with winning of top five? Can you just tell us how many of the top five web-scale customers you have?

That’s three, three, Mike, we have direct that, what we are talking about here to Jim’s point direct relationships, we actually provide services to all of them indirectly, but directly is three.

Okay. Thanks a lot and congrats on the great quarter.

Thanks, Mike.

Thanks, Mike.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Jeff Kvaal from Nomura. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Thank you, gentlemen. I wanted to ask you about, Jim, your comment about velocity of sales given that it sounds like things are picking up in terms of your ability to booking shipper in a quarter? Can you tell us what that might mean in terms of interpreting your record orders commentary, does that mean that the record orders essentially just showed up in this quarter or does that mean that they apply to future quarters? And then as part of that, does that change your general visibility…

Yeah. I think the last point I will address first, is clearly a bigger backlog, Jeff, means that we do have more visibility in what’s going to happen. And you should also note that it’s not always the case, when we get orders that customers want them immediately. In some cases they want them out a quarter or two quarters or some period of time it reflects the period over which they are building their network. So, although, the fact that we have record orders in the quarter is a hugely positive statement and the fact that our backlog grew is a hugely positive statement. That -- it is actually not exactly the same statement as the fact that our business is experiencing higher velocity there are -- the two can be separate. I think actually both are true. We are doing a backlog and secondly we are able to deliver on much shorter lead times. We had improved our lead times considerably over the last year and we are able to pretty much meet demands for lead times across our products set, which is a big improvement for us. We are very happy about that.

Thank you, gentlemen.

Yeah.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Amit Passi from UBS. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Good morning. I wanted to go back to the strength in North America. I think your AT&T business was about flat quarter-over-quarter, yet you delivered about 20% growth. You talked about strength in cable MSOs. I just wanted to get a sense for the sustainability of the strength you saw in North America or again, should we expect sort of quarter-to-quarter volatility but it was quite impressive, particularly given your largest customer was flat sequentially?

Thanks, Amit. I think it actually talks to the overall diversification that we’ve achieved within North America where on the enterprise space government, cable that Jim highlighted. Obviously the web-scale which we’ve talked about, Tier 2 type carriers and I also think it talks to this emerging of the whole metro place and its various dimensions. And I think that opens up to a lot more customers generally and I think we are seeing that certainly in North America. And I think we are seeing signs of that outside of North America as well, as some of these international geographies begin to make the same kind of shift, we see an opportunity to address new and different customers internationally as well. So that’s why we are encouraged by the overall momentum that we are seeing.

So nothing usually Gary, seems like, I mean the underlying trends appear to be sustainable going forward?

Absolutely. I see a very sort of broad-based demand across the board geographies and customers are going to fluctuate quarter-to-quarter for sure. I don’t read too much into that. But I mean, generally, I think you can see the trend now across all the customer bases, across all the geographies. It’s going in one direction.

And then just as a quick follow-up, can you maybe just give us an update on where we are with the Verizon 100 gig rollouts, just how things are progressing, just will be good to get an update on that?

Yeah. They are progressing extremely well. We are deeply engaged with them as you would expect in all of the trials, et cetera. And I think as we said, we don't expect to take meaningful revenues this fiscal year. But we do expect to start to take revenues as we get through 2016 and we are very focused on the rollout for them.

Through fiscal 2016 or calendar?

It will start in 2016, probably calendar.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Ehud Gelblum from Citi. Please go ahead.

Hey guys. It’s Ehud. Thank you. Couple of clarifications. I know this is a silly question, but Jim I didn’t actually hear you reiterate the 5% growth for the year, just want to confirm that so we can have a sense as to what you acknowledged for Q4?

Yes. We did, we reiterated our revenue and OpEx guidance that we talked about in March, which was slightly different from where we started the year from.

Right. I heard the OpEx. I didn’t quite hear the revenues, so thank you. That’s good. One quick question on the durations of the backlog and then I want to talk about gross margin for a bit. But on the duration of backlog as we try to understand the revenue progression in the next -- in Q3 and Q4 this year and again, this has been asked already in contrast to the record bookings quarter. Given the sense, are these bookings, are these things actual orders for things that people need now, or will these bookings sort of like two and three year contract where your customers, perhaps these Web 2.0 guys said, these are the demand and the needs we are going to have, so we are going to lock in prices now and we are going to order them now even though you expect to ship them over the course of a couple of years as a multi-year contract, which is terrific on the visibility front as opposed to traditionally you are not exactly a book and ship business but more so where a booking comes in and we expect it to go out in the next three to six months. Did the duration of these bookings go out more?

Ehud, I would say it really talks to the whole diversification piece. You’ve got a lot of different sets of customers and to your point, we’ve got customers that require deliveries ideally within days and we’ve got customers that are doing projects that as Jim was saying around six to nine months in terms of their project planning and delivery. So the answer to the question is we’ve got both and so record order quarter can mean a lot of different things but obviously the demand overall is very strong, which is a good thing but it’s a mix. It’s a mix of things that will roll into this quarter. There is a couple of projects there that will be a couple of quarters out. So it gives us better visibility and we’re able to actually because of the increase in our velocity of our business get some of these orders to revenue faster. So it’s coming together nicely in terms of the overall business model as we have different kinds of customers with different kind of dynamics around what they want when, but you’ve got all of that mix in the pot.

So it sounds like these actually are project-based orders as opposed to maintenance upgrade orders as in we know we’re going to need this for the next three years, so let me just place the order now…

It is -- I’d say to you it is very -- we don’t actually take many orders that are more than sort of six to nine months out for revenue. It does happen, but it’s actually quite unusual. So it’s not people saying from a platform point of view I am going to roll this out over three years. They would not place the orders that much in advance.

Okay. That’s very helpful. A quick question if I could on the gross margin. Gross margin this quarter was strong. AT&T although stayed flat, obviously fell as a percentage of your mix. And if you look next quarter, are we to assume that kind of the thing that brings the gross margin back down to 43%, is it a pickup in Tier 1s, whether it’s AT&T or other Tier 1s that kind of does that? Or is it international versus U.S. mix that brings it back down again? And if you can give us a sense on -- traditionally your gross margin was dominated much more by the mix between chassis and a line cards. Was that particularly strong this quarter? If you can give us a sense, geographies, line cards, chassis and Tier 1 versus non-Tier 1. What were the factors this quarter and what do you expect the factors to be next quarter?

I think what you’re seeing is a combination of all of those things, obviously go into the margin. But I think if you were just sort of distill it down, it’s really about increasing levels of software across the portfolio. Even if you take the line card example, wider margins higher on that because you got more software in it. If you take the example of the WaveLogic, cost reductions that we’re bringing into market, essentially that’s really because we’re putting more software content out there that people are prepared to pay for. So all of those dynamics are in play and obviously supply chain improvements and efficiencies, economies of scale, all of those things come into play. But if you sort of step back from it, it really is around fulfilling this architecture, the OPn architecture around on-demand, which is more software centric. And so that really is the overall dynamic. You are seeing it in the first part of this year with some good step function up in gross margins. We continue to be confident about the progress that we can make there. Obviously, it’s the most difficult thing for us to forecast terribly accurately. There is an awful lot of different dynamics go into that. But we think on balance, as we look at the remainder of the year, it’s about sort of 43%. Could it be higher? That’s certainly possible. But our best judgment right now is around about that sort of 43% mark, which, as Jim said, let’s assume that for the sake of the conversation, that’s a pretty good step function on 2014, which was 42%, would be a 43.5%for the whole year. And so we are beginning to see the operating leverage from the design of the business, both from a diversification point of view and increased levels across the software, across the portfolio.

Thanks. Appreciate it.

Thanks, Ehud.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Paul Silverstein from Cowen and Company. Please go ahead.

Hey, Gary, Jim, if you said earlier in the call, I apologize, I have been cutting in and out. I know you haven’t given it in the past. So can you tell us the nature, not the names, but the nature of your top five customers, Cable MSO, service provider, Web 2.0, whatever?

Yes. And by the way, this is going to move around quarter-to-quarter, but essentially this quarter we are dominated by of course AT&T is important to us, MSOs is important to us, and international customer is -- and APAC is a very important, a big carrier is important to us, that’s what I’d say.

And were there any Web 2.0s in the top five?

Not this quarter. In the top 10, yes. Not in the top five.

Is that the first time they have been in the top 10, or have one or more of the -- I think historically you have had two of the top five and now you have three. Historically in other quarters have they been among the top five, top 10?

Yes. We had in both Q4 of last year and Q1 of this year a web-scale customer, was our second largest customer. And so we’re still making progress with that customer. Don’t get too hung up, as we’ve said about any particular one quarter, I think the overall trend is very positive in that space.

One more question if I may. I know it sure doesn’t seem it from the numbers and from your commentary. But relative to the concern that’s been out there that what AT&T did to you all several quarters back is going to happen again and it’s going to happen among other carriers. I take it that hasn’t been the case and there is no visibility to that happening.

There is no visibility to it. I do not think [Technical Difficulty] what happened. We’ve got a much more diversified base.

Okay. I’ll pass it on. Thanks, guys.

Thanks, Paul.

Thanks, Paul.

Thank you. And our next question comes from George Notter from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi, there. Thanks very much, guys. I wanted to ask about your delivery of 16QAM modulation through the WaveLogic technology. You guys seem to be really early in terms of delivery of that. Can you talk about your time to market advantage and how many of your customers are deploying it? I guess then I am also curious about what that does for you in terms of incremental ability to compete for deals, the incremental benefit you might be getting through the P&L as well. Thanks.

Yes. Thank you. So we were first to market on 100 gig QPSK. We’re also leading on 100 gig VPSK, which is modulation format for long distance. And we’ve done the same thing on 16QAM. That’s one of the reasons we’ve continued to invest in our coherent DSP engine WaveLogic 3 and variations of it. As you will have seen, we’ve launched WaveLogic 3 Nano, which is a metro-oriented low power consumption version of the chips and WaveLogic 3 Extreme, which drives performance across a number of applications. And it’s based on those engines that we’ve been able to be first to market on 16QAM. As you will have seen, we started shipping 200 gig line cards this quarter. In fact, about 80% of the shipments have gone through web-scale providers because they’re very hungry for high bandwidth and need the spectral efficiency. And our 16QAM, the 200 gig shipments are based on 16QAM modulation and that’s doing two things for us. Number one, really extending our differentiation in the web-scale space in particular, but number two, helping the improvement in gross margins that Gary talked about. And it’s a good example of how different software modulation techniques actually help our gross margins on bandwidth shipments.

Got it. And then just as a follow-up on that. You are delivering 2x the capacity by implementing 16QAM. I mean, are you getting a price improvement on a per wavelength basis because of that? Or is it something that helps you kind of sustain pricing at the prior levels? I guess I am just trying to figure out if it’s really incremental in terms of the revenue impact to the company.

Yes. So the fact we can get 2x the capacity on a wavelength, eventually the way that web-scale providers and carriers compare that, they do their comparisons on a price per bit basis, so of course it gives us an advantage. But in an environment where customers don’t have a lot of fiber and spectral efficiency matters, it gives us potentially an additional, certainly negotiation position and this is the case in MSOs. And Jim's mentioned the importance of MSOs to us and it’s also the case with web-scale providers.

Got it. And then just one last question on that. So when do you think you’ll see other competitors in the space also delivering 16QAM commercially?

I wouldn’t comment on the where each vendor would be able to do that. What I would say to you is we continue to invest in modern technologies as a core competency and a core differentiator for Ciena. And what you'll see from us is we will continue to move the bar. Beyond 16QAM there are other modulation formats, there are other technologies in coherent DSP that we’re going to be putting out in the market. So I continue to believe we’re going to be leading the market in this space.

Thanks, George.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Jess Lubert from Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. Couple quick questions. First, just on the revenue outlook, can you help us understand how come we shouldn't be thinking about better than 5% growth in fiscal 2015 given the strength this quarter and record orders entering the second half?

The only thing I’d say about that Jess is we -- every quarter, we try to give the best call we can given what our outlook is for the quarter. We look at backlog. We do a bottoms-up from our sales force as to what they are thinking and we try to give it to you as squarely as we can. Could we do better than what we said? Yes, we could do better than that. But all I can say is that it reflects our best view today based on backlog and outlook by the sales guys.

But there is no reason to think that as we look out towards Q4, that your expectations have moderated from where they were when you originally gave 5%?

Absolutely not. There has been no moderation of anything. We feel better about our business today than we did at beginning of the year.

And then can you update us on the status of the U.S. Federal deals that had slipped from last quarter? How many of those closed this quarter? How many are left? Any visibility on that?

We took some of that in Q2. There will be some more coming that’s in our expectations for the year. I guess, I would say though that we did highlighted as one of the reasons why our revenue came in where it did. But we feel very, very good about our future in the government business. We do think we have some very unique solutions. We’ll have some applications that will be pointed at them and so we feel really good about them. The progress over time, I think will be very good.

And then the last one for me, I was hoping you could update us on the contribution of the 5400 in the period and help us understand what you are seeing with respect to switching attach rates on the 6500 and how you would expect switching revenue to progress during the second half?

Let’s see, we have some data. We have 41 customers on the 5400, that’s an increase of one for the quarter. We have about 40, 6500 OTN switching customers, if you look at that compared to last quarter, that’s up from just a few. So, our switching revenue this year is $51 million. It’s up 6% year-over-year but it's really the fact that we integrated OTN into our 6500 platforms, which is really the most important piece of this picture and gives us a very nice competitive position as well.

You will continue to see that trend as the deployments in the metro for packet-optical technologies continue to increase. Really, our ability to bring packet OTN and transport technologies in the same system is a key differentiator, that’s allowing us to win a lot of business and carry a metro networks access. Lorraine, can we go to the next question please?

Thank you. And our next question comes from Simon Leopold from Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Thank you. First, a quick one and then a trending question. I am aware that your sales aren't going to strictly match to carrier CapEx. But just wondering if you can give us some color on how you expect AT&T to trend in the second half of your fiscal year given that their CapEx model suggests much higher spending in the second half but you've done particularly well with them when their spending was low. That's the first part. The second thing I was hoping you could give us a little bit more color on what is going on in the Packet Networking segment. I was a bit surprised because I thought that segment was going to be a bigger part of the mix in the April quarter. It sounds like you're landing design wins and I am just wondering how to think about the trending for Packet Networking, whether we are seeing applications broaden from maybe the cable MSO used for enterprises, whether that has applications for maybe some residential type broadband services and how to think about Packet Networking either in July or longer-term? Thank you.

Why don’t I take the first question, Simon? I think even -- I would make the comment generally. It’s not and as you say, we’ve made it for a while. It’s not about the total spend. It’s about what they are spending it on. I think the same thing applies as you get down into the carrier specific and when you talk about something like AT&T, that’s really a market in itself. It’s the largest buyer of these kinds of technologies in the world and it’s really about what they are spending it on. So they can have an environment where they can be CapEx constrained or down, or cut and we can still actually do extremely well because we are at the priority points of what they are doing on the network. I would expect to see a reasonable second half from them as well without getting into too much detail about it. I think our engagement with them across multiple elements, including rolling out of the metro gives us good confidence around the sustainability over this in the next couple of years.

On the Packet Networking visios, we’ve always just been careful about building a trend based on one quarter results. We’ve done extremely well in Packet Networking and that is another problem, which has integrated into a 6500 platforms and so we sell that not just as a standalone technology but also integrated into our 6500 platform. We did say that we’ve had a 26% increase year-over-year in the packet capacity shift. The packet standalone switching was down a bit for the quarter. I just would say that given what we are doing there, we’ve introduced the 8700 platform. We will have other products coming out over time. So, I think we are extremely well positioned. Our customer list is diversifying even in that group. So, we feel good about what’s going to happen with that. We are not going to comment on what’s going to happens in the July quarter on Packet Networking. That’s always dangerous for us to give any sequential guidance about pretty much anything other than the big numbers in our income statement.

Could you talk a little about the applications for Packet Networking, of how they may or may not be evolving, particularly maybe residential opportunities?

Yes. A couple of trends there. So the focus of our solutions is not so much residential aggregation or opportunities, as it is mainly delivering Ethernet business services and mobile backhaul for whether it’s independent mobile operators or fixed line carriers offering mobile backhaul services to mobile operators. So those are the two focused areas of deployments of our packet solutions. I would add though that a key trend we are seeing with introduction of the 8700 is where we will also compete deeper into the aggregation of networks then we have had before and that allows us to pull through some products in the access space as well. So, we are competing deeper into metro and aggregation with the 8700 and that’s happening across the board, its carriers, MSOs, actually research and education, NTGs and we're starting to see applicability as well in the data center space.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Natarajan Subrahmanyan from The Juda Group. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I had two questions. First on the packet optical space, that Cisco winning the second position and Verizon and more talk about optical integration into packet platforms carrier, curios to see how you see that progressing in terms of physical integration of traditional packet technology and optical into single platforms and how that might be changing the competitive environment? My other question was on the non-telco side. 32% of revenues were both web-scale and cable north of 10% overall revenues. Can you give us some sense of what that constituents of that 32% of revenues are?

Let me take second half and then we will go back to the first half. As we said, we had a particularly strong quarter in the MSO space. We had record for the two biggest customers that we had. So, we feel great about that, feel great about our progress in that space and that was the story in the quarter. We had a good quarter with web-scale. We have great expectations there as well. But the quarter itself was really dominated by what we did on the MSO side.

To the question on the Packet Optical integration. So, yes, that was a key factor in Verizon’s decision. But I would say that this is playing out across the Board as carriers want to basically pack as many services as they can on their optical networks. The ability to take TDM services, Ethernet services and OTN services and aggregate them efficiently into optical wavelength containers is a critical differentiator. And it is not something that we just starting working on, Ciena has been working on these technologies for multiple years and when we believe we are now well ahead of the market in terms of Packet Optical conversion. I would point out that in metro networks as these architectural changes take hold, it is making it hard for folks who only have optical transport capabilities to compete in these opportunities where Packet OTN control plane and leading-edge transport capabilities are required and these are architectural changes that we are now starting to see across Tier 1 carriers and Tier 2 carriers.

Thank you.

And if I could follow-up, I just wanted to see if there's a traditionally, people who have not played in optical transport being more packet players, if you are seeing them more with integrated photonics especially in sort of the data center or connect metro sort of markets?

No. I will say the dynamic in the data center interconnect market that today is still mostly point to point transport market, where the goal of the data center operators is just to ship as many bits as they can in a strand of fiber and it’s a pure optical transport opportunity. It's really in the carrier space and where the mix of services needs to be aggregated on the network that we are seeing this Packet Optical conversions take hold in the metro. And really they where what we are seeing is an architectural drive is converging layer zero to two services in this metro networks and for layers above that we are starting to see virtualization -- network function virtualization start to take hold and as a different way of carrying layer three services and above.

Thank you.

Thank you.

That’s going to be our last question for today. We appreciate everyone taking their time to speak with us and listen to our call. We look forward to catching up with everyone over the next few weeks, few months and thank you very much. Have a good day.