Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Brent, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Ciena Fiscal Q1 2022 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Gregg Lampf, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Brent. Good morning, and welcome to Ciena's 2022 Fiscal First Quarter Results Conference Call. Our call today is scheduled for up to 45 minutes. With me today is Gary Smith, President and CEO; Jim Moylan, CFO; and Scott McFeely, Senior Vice President of Global Product & Services. In addition to this call and the press release, we have posted to the Investors section of our website and accompanying investor presentation that reflects this discussion as well as certain highlighted items from the quarter. Our comments today speak to our recent performance, our views on current market dynamics and drivers of our business as well as a discussion of our financial outlook. Today's discussion includes certain adjusted or non-GAAP measures of Ciena's results of operations. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to our GAAP results is included in today's press release. Before turning the call over to Gary, I'll remind you that during this call, we'll be making certain forward-looking statements. Such statements, including our quarterly and annual guidance, discussion of market opportunities and strategy, and commentary about the impact of COVID-19, supply chain constraints and geopolitical dynamics are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions regarding the company and its markets, which include risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the statements discussed today. These statements should be viewed in the context of the risk factors detailed in our most recent 10-K filing and in our upcoming 10-Q filing, which is required to be filed with the SEC by March 11. We expect to file by that date. Ciena assumes no obligation to update the information discussed in this conference call, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. As always, we will allow for as much Q&A as possible today, though we ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. And as a reminder, we will be hosting investor meetings with the sell-side at OFC tomorrow and Wednesday. We look forward to seeing many of you there. With that, I'll turn the call over to Gary.

Thanks, Gregg, and good morning, everyone. Before I speak to our results, I would like to express our care, concern and support for the people of the Ukraine, those with friends and family in the region and with all of our employees, customers and partners who are feeling the weight of this situation. This conflict in the region is leading to tragic outcomes for the Ukrainian people and with a significant and growing humanitarian crisis underway. We will be making a corporate donation to Ukrainian relief efforts in addition to reinforcing with our employees and Ciena Cares Matching Program. Whilst the company has very limited exposure in the region and we do not expect there to be a material impact on our global business. We are complying with all U.S. and international sanctions and export control requirements imposed on Russia, including having already stopped shipments upon the escalation of the conflict. When combining those actions with our strong position to stand in solidarity with Ukraine, we have made the decision to immediately suspend our business operations in Russia. Like everyone, we will continue to monitor the situation and specifically, the potential for broader geopolitical and global economic consequences. Moving to our Q1 results. Today, we reported fiscal first quarter revenue of $844.4 million, adjusted gross margin of 46.2% and adjusted operating expense of $219 million, in line with the revised expectations we communicated a few weeks ago. As a reminder, these quarterly results reflect specific supply chain disruptions that happened late in our first quarter and occurred within an already challenged logistics environment that was worsened by the Omicron surge. To be clear, we have subsequently managed through those specific disruptions that occurred in Q1. Importantly, long-term secular demand is very strong, driven by the acceleration of cloud adoption and…

Thanks, Gary, and good morning, everyone. As Gary mentioned, total Q1 revenue was $844.4 million. Adjusted gross margin in the quarter was strong, at 46.2%. This reflects a particularly strong revenue contribution from our software and services businesses that helped to offset some of the impact of the higher supply and logistics costs we are seeing. In Q1, adjusted operating expense was $290 million. With respect to profitability measures, in Q1, we delivered adjusted operating margin of 11.8%, adjusted net income of $72.6 million and adjusted EPS of $0.47. In addition, we used cash from operations in the quarter, primarily related to significant investments in inventory, something we believe will be a significant differentiator over time. And finally, adjusted EBITDA in Q1 was $123.7 million. Reflecting the addition of the net proceeds of our successful bond offering in January, we ended the quarter with approximately $1.7 billion in cash and investments. With a strong balance sheet, we continue to return capital to stockholders. In Q1, we entered into an ASR arrangement under our new share repurchase program, repurchasing $250 million of common stock in the quarter. The final settlement of the ASR was completed in Q2 and approximately 3.6 million shares were repurchased through the arrangement. Keep in mind that we have an additional $750 million authorized under our current repurchase plan, which we intend to utilize by the end of fiscal 2024. Turning now to our guidance. As we said a few weeks ago, we continue to expect to achieve our annual revenue guidance of 11% to 13% growth for fiscal year '22. Our confidence in this outlook is based on a very strong demand environment, expected benefits from our continued investments in supply chain capacity and greater visibility provided by our order flow and backlog. More specifically, we…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Amit Daryanani with Evercore.

Just the first question on my side. Can you just talk about historically, what does price increases look like for Ciena and what you do for your customers? And how does that look like in calendar '22? And what's sort of embedded in your guide from pricing perspective?

I'm sorry, Amit, you're talking about price increases?

Yes.

Well, the dynamics of our industry have always been such that technology reduces the cost of our goods by just 25% a year, a significant amount of cost reduction in our products, which competition basically causes us to pass along to our customers that when you get a 30% increase in the underlying demand for capacity, that's how you get to an industry that grows 5%. So it's actually been common for us over many, many years to show lower prices per unit of capacity. Now we are talking with our customers today about the fact that our costs actually have gone up quite a bit, particularly with respect to semiconductors and integrated circuits. And so we are talking with our customers about sharing in this cost increase. We don't expect that will have much effect this year. If anything, it will be an effect for next year, but price increases are somewhat of a rarity in our business.

Fair enough. And then I was hoping you could just spend a few minutes just talking about the web-scale business. You saw a nice double-digit growth in the Jan quarter. Sort of, one, enabling that organic versus share gain, and how do you see that segment stack up for the rest of the year?

Amit, I think what we're seeing is, obviously, increasing DCI build-outs globally, and we've got a very large market share in web-scale, as you know, but we actually think we're probably going to be taking share based on some of the commitments that we're seeing being placed on us already. So I think it's just a very healthy market that's really building out more and more data centers around the globe. We have multifaceted relationships with these web-scale players, both in terms of domestic, international, submarine. And I think not just in terms of point-to-point, but also a very large 6,500 network capacity with a lot of these players as well. So it's a very, very good quarter, and we're going to have a good year with web-scale.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Long with Barclays.

Gary, I was hoping you could talk a little bit about some of the businesses you’re calling out, Routing and Switching and even Software and Blue Planet businesses that performed very well in the quarter. Could you talk a little bit about kind of cross-sell in that area? How are you willing – how good are you at kind of pulling the installed base over? And how much of that is winning new customers with those offerings? And then the follow-up would just be, could you just talk a little bit about the Europe and Asia theaters. They look like to be a little bit under pressure year-over-year with that components? Or is there something else going on in those regions?

Okay. Why don’t I take that one first, Tim, and then work back through and then talk about the software and cross-selling and then Scott will talk a little bit about the packet, Routing and Switching. On the Europe and Asia, we’re seeing strong demand across all geographies. So I think really Q1 is more about supply constraint than really extrapolating out too many dynamics around the different geographies. Particularly in Europe, we’re seeing strong demand really after a period of underinvestment, frankly, over the last few years, even pre-COVID. So I think Europe is going to be very strong. India, I think, was also down in Q1, but I think it’s going to have a very good year based on the order flows. So that’s probably a good example. I just think it’s - wouldn’t extrapolate too much out based on the challenges around supply constraint, which is going to be with us for a little bit what for a while. On the software side, as Jim said, we had a strong quarter. Good growth on both Blue Planet, which really is focused at the service creation layer in the automation. We’ve seen a lot of carriers, particularly as they’ve gone through COVID, really now prioritize their – the automation of their network. So we’re seeing very healthy demand in Blue Planet. Similarly, MCP, which is really the automation of the network layer. Now the numbers look very good from a growth point of view, but we’re coming from – it’s a newly introduced platform, but we’re very encouraged with what we’re seeing there. And that’s into – we’ve now got MCP into pretty much all of our major customers around the world and that gives us a platform to upsell various applications on top of that, and then obviously, into the services layer with Blue Planet as well, which is part of our strategy. And then obviously, as we’re seeing the convergence of packet and optical, we’ve invested heavily in our Switching and Routing portfolio. Scott, any other?

Just on the Routing and Switching piece. I think where we’re seeing the strongest demand and the biggest successes where our service providers, our MSO customers have built out their fiber plants closer to their end customers, whether that be a wireless play, an enterprise play or a residential play, and obviously, we’ve got tremendous relationships with those service providers and MSOs around the world. So that helps in that conversation. As we look forward, we’re certainly starting to see some of the Tier 2 and Tier 3 providers looking for end-to-end solutions. So being able to offer both the core and those access and aggregation solution plays to our strength as well. And as you think about the next-generation metro and edge, we firmly believe the winning hand there is going to be optimized Routing and Switching, optics, photonics and multilayer control. And Gary talked about the software assets there, those have a strong value proposition when you start to look at those networks coming together as well.

Your next question is from Rod Hall with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

I just wanted to come back to this backlog of $3 billion and ask maybe a couple of questions on that. One is, do you expect that to rise further in the coming quarter or two? Or do you think that this is the peak and you start to work the backlog down? And then my follow-up will be regarding backlog as well.

Well, it's always dangerous to say what's going to happen in any given quarter with respect to orders, but we do expect a strong order flow this quarter. And I wouldn't be surprised if the backlog grew this quarter. And as we look out, we're going to have a very good year. I just ask everybody to remember though that a lot of this order flow is people giving us visibility into their order flow -- into their demand for this year, and in some cases, even into next year. And so it's great. It's wonderful. We're seeing strong demand, but I shouldn't extrapolate what's going on now into any sort of revenue expectation.

Right. Yes, that makes sense, Jim. And then I wanted to also ask, it's great that you guys have this visibility there. I think that's the first time I've ever seen that on Ciena with that kind of visibility given the industry. But I was wondering where you think you might finish the year in terms of backlog? What do you expect half of that to be gone? Can you give us any idea of kind of where the backlog might end up by the end of the year?

Rod, I absolutely get the question. I just don't think that would be appropriate for us to extrapolate out because we'll then get into a conversation about 23. We're one of the few companies that's actually giving guidance for the full year of '22. I think we'd be getting a little ahead of ourselves to that. But I mean, to Jim's point, it's a very strong demand characteristics. It's security of supply, absolutely, there's a large portion of that. But we also feel that the secular demand around cloud adoption is going to give us a multiyear platform here for growth. So we feel very good around the secular dynamics of our space and our position in it just continues to get stronger. In all likelihood, to put a pin in it, we are going to probably have orders outstrip revenue in Q2 as well. That's our expectation. We'll see how that plays through for the for the rest of the year.

Your next question is from Paul Silverstein with Cowen.

I was hoping you provide some more granular insight regarding revenue diversification from a customer perspective. I know there hasn't been meaningful concentration in a long time, but as you look forward over the next 4 quarters and beyond, I assume the strength you're looking at is not a function of any 1 or 2 customers, but it's far more broad than that. But any granularity both within the web-scale and more broadly, beyond web-scale. And then I've got a follow-up.

We're seeing demand very broadly around the world and across verticals, Paul. We -- our concentration numbers, generally speaking, haven't change significantly, except that our -- the percentage, which our 2 biggest customers represent has come down quite a bit. But our top 10 customers are around 50% and that's been that way for a long time. I think it will continue to be. But beyond that, the top 10 customers in terms of volume, we have a whole long list of customers that are seeing the same kind of demand on their networks that the bigger companies are. And we are winning our fair share or more than our fair share, frankly, of all of those build-outs.

All right. And then -- I'm sorry, Gary.

Go, Paul.

Within Routing and Switching, how much of the growth you're looking at going forward? Is that a function of new customers, new projects, at the new customers versus new projects or extended projects that exist in customers? And I'm talking organically [indiscernible] buyout…

You're talking about winning, Routing and Switching from customers who are not current optical customers. Is that what your question -- the basis of your question?

I'm talking about Routing and Switching incremental revenue from --

Well, I would articulate it, I think your question is, how much of it is sort of continued build-outs from existing footprint versus new application footprint, not necessarily new Ciena customers but new application footprint.

Well, how much is from existing Routing and Switching customers? How much is from customers that haven't yet bought Routing and Switching?

Okay. I think it depends on the time horizon. Certainly, the growth trajectory that we see in Routing and Switching has an expectation and dependency on us winning new logos, but for 2022, the bulk of it is sort of existing applications and existing customers.

Your next question is from Simon Leopold with Raymond James.

I know you've talked about your efforts to raise prices to offset costs and you've counseled us that it doesn't really affect fiscal '22, but it is effective in fiscal '23. Given the progress to date, do you have a sense of how to quantify essentially the revenue growth tailwind for fiscal '23 coming from the price increases? Essentially, I'm looking for some quantification and some sense of the progress you've made, talking to customers about higher prices? And then I've got a quick follow-up.

Simon, let me take that. I think it's an ongoing conversation. I think they progressed very well. Obviously, most of our major customers understand very well the global issues that we're all facing. I would say, it's been very constructive and very positive, but as Jim said earlier, that's not going to impact any of our financial performance probably in this year. And I think just from a '23 perspective, Simon, it's way too early to start talking about next year. I mean we're already providing pretty detailed guidance for this year, and we're one of the few companies to do that. I just don't think it would be appropriate for us to get into those kinds of things about '23. I would say, we feel very positive about the strong secular demand and our position in the space, and we think this is going to be clearly a multiyear growth platform for us, but I just don't think it's appropriate to get so far ahead of our skis right now.

Okay. And just as my follow-up. It appears that your services gross margin was actually a bit better than the last 4 quarters or so. I'm just wondering whether there was something unusual in this quarter? Or whether we should think about more sustainability of a better services gross margin? If so, why?

Well, as you know, Simon, our services revenue stack is made up of a whole list of projects that are in various stages of their lives. And so I'd just attribute that movement to ebbs and flows of the business that's going to move around a bit. I'd say this, we've been very pleased with the progress we've made on our gross margins and services over the last several years. We've done a lot of things in our services, supply chain and capacity set to enable that gross margin. And so we're pleased with where it is, and hopefully, it will get better over time, but we don't think that you should take too much out of any one quarter.

Your next question comes from the line of Jim Suva with Citigroup.

I think it was in the prepared comments by Gary. You mentioned kind of a little bit more mine business. Just curious, is that because you've seen a meaningful increase in demand for it or because you have the ability to secure the supply of such products and therefore, lead demand where other ones you've had more supply challenges? I'm just kind of curious about that and the sustainability, is that something we should expect to continue to be a little more tilted that direction?

We are seeing a higher percentage of commons and photonics this year as compared to previous years. That's a good thing. That means that the build-outs that we the wins that we've had over the past few years are starting to build out, and so you can expect that to be a good thing for our future. What we said was that the gross margin guide for Q2 is as a result of a higher proportion of lower gross margin commons and photonics. So all of that is sort of of a piece.

Jim, the other thing I would add there is, it's also the context of this is a number of wins that we had. Frankly, some of these dates back to pre-COVID, but kind of got put on hold from an operational point of view over the last couple of years, and we're now seeing them deploy. So it's new accounts and new customers that we're deploying there. And as Jim said, that's -- it's very positive. It bodes well for their commitment to the future to us, but it's also existing customers now reinvesting in their both capacity and network modernization. So it's this classic sort of line system, photonics and commons, which then will follow as they fill in with cards over time. So it's not really -- it is constrained by supply chain, but we're also seeing it from an order point of view as well.

Your next question is from Tal Liani with Bank of America.

I went to see -- I went to Mobile World Congress last week, and I was surprised with how much discussion there was for white box routing with pluggables and also pluggables and traditional routers. And the question is, I understand that there is great demand in the current times and the current build-out is probably not with this kind of solutions, but thinking about the long term, what is the implications for demand in your space? And how are you positioned if the market migrates to these kind of solutions?

Yes, Tal, it's Scott here. Separate out sort of the white box phenomena from your second theme there, which is kind of, I'll call it, convergence. Personally, I think for our customer segmentation. We're not really seeing a lot of deployments of the white box piece because, frankly, as you sort of disaggregate the stuff, someone has to put it back together again and that's typically not the business of our customers. On the convergence piece, for some parts of the network, we do see that as an evolution, and we've talked about this in our next-generation metro and edge capabilities, where we really firmly believe the winning hand there is going to be best-in-class optics, best-in-class photonics, a lightweight Routing and Switching capabilities and the off-box software control systems that allow you to manage and automate that network across the layers cost effectively. And we've been investing in those threads for a long time and part of the fruits of that investment you're starting to see come with growth in our Routing and Switching business.

So your position is, it's not going to happen for now because of certain things -- and I agree with you, but what happens, if it happens? What happens if pluggables are going to be deployed by carriers or demanded by cloud companies? Does it mean that Ciena is going to see shrinkage or a decline in demand in the market? Or is --

Different parts of the network are going to have different evolutions and solutions. We firmly believe that the core infrastructure of the network is not going to sacrifice announce the performance, and therefore, it's going to continue to be separate deployments. As you get closer to the edge, we think the conversion does have a play, and we think that's a greater opportunity than it is for us because there's other spend that we are not -- haven't historically been addressing that is now available to us.

Remember, we talked about an expanded TAM and part of this is the context of what we're talking about here.

Exactly.

You next question comes from the line of Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley.

Great. Maybe just on the second half ramp. Understanding that you're not guiding to fiscal Q3, but just -- should that be a step function as we head towards the second half of the year? Or kind of a more gradual ramp of capacity in kind of some of these supply chain bottlenecks releasing? And then the second question, I mean I would assume not, but any impact to subsea consortiums or anything by just given the geopolitical -- kind of heightened geopolitical environment we're seeing right now?

Yes. What I would say, Meta, is that Q3 has always been a very strong quarter for us, just given the sort of annual sequence of the way our customers operate. And so we'll see nice -- I think we'll see a nice move in Q3. You ought to look at last year, look at last year and drive your view of what this year is going to look like based on last because that's kind of the way we're thinking.

And Meta, on the second part of your question, we are not obviously early days, but we're not seeing any geopolitical fallout yet on any of the submarine system, cables or in the rest of it, and frankly, quite the opposite. We're seeing very robust demand around the globe for that.

Your next question is from Fahad Najam with Loop Capital.

Gary, I wanted to kind of get your help in understanding your comment about strategic investments in increasing supply chain capacity for the second half. Can you elaborate a little bit more? Is it just you procuring more components? Or are you adding more manufacturing line? How much of this expansion in -- or increase in supply chain capacity is a permanent investment versus just buying more inventory?

We just say, all of the above. But Scott, do you want to --

Yes. I think you can think of it in 3 swim lanes. One is, we're not following, I guess, the just-in-time inventory approach of yester years on the components that aren't in short supply. So you can see it in our raw material inventory, we're sort of building that up, waiting for the more constrained component so that we can turn that into finished goods quickly. So that's number one. Number two is, we made the decision 9-plus months ago to bet heavily on significant growth in our business in the second half of the year and put significant demand on, I'll just say, the component industry, playing to the rules of their new extended lead time. So we're not expecting any change in lead times, but we made that bet a long time ago. And then the third thing is, in order to turn it into finished goods in faster manner, we were -- we've increased our capacity on the production side, largely in the test capacity. So we can turn that around quickly. So those are the 3 main things.

Okay. So if among the stuff that you've invested in just inventory and some of it is permanent like the additional test capacity. How should we think about the implications on your gross margins going forward? If assuming your 6% to 8% long-term guidance holds, does that have any meaningful impact on the trajectory of the gross margin? Or does that also mean that you're probably better positioned to maybe --

Yes. The way you should think about it, I think, in terms of -- you're talking about the capital investment on the production side. It's a minor needle mover from a gross margin perspective, and we're really talking about pulling forward investment capacity that we would have put in place in '23 in U.S.

Your next question comes from the line of Alex Henderson with Needham.

You made the comment in your prepared remarks that you expect a significant improvement in the back half of the year in terms of components, yet when I talk to virtually everybody else in the industry, they're saying that conditions have not improved and in fact, may have eroded the rate of decommits on orders has gone up. Virtually every other manufacturer has done the same thing you've done, which has stretched out their orders and committed to significant increases in the future. Your third quarter fiscal year is pretty close. I mean that's the July quarter. So what gives you the confidence that the supply chain conditions are going to improve and you're not going to get decommits based off of what seems to be continued stretching of duration across the entire industry as well as decommits showing up at a lot of other vendors.

There's a couple of things in there. So let's first of all talk about lead times from what we've seen lead times haven't really changed. They did a step function a while ago to be pretty extreme in terms of the lead times. It haven't gotten worse and haven't gotten better, and we're not depending on them getting better. We put orders in a long time ago playing by the new rules, embedding on our business. And if others didn't make that bet and I can see they're showing up today trying to do it, they're facing those lead times and they're stretched out. Now what we've been following very, very carefully whether or not those component suppliers have been delivering to their new and advertised lead times and for the most part, I'd say, yes, they have. Then you talked about decommits. I actually -- from our perspective, the decommits in terms of the quantity of them haven't really changed. They're happening, absolutely. I would actually say, they're actually less severe than they were 3 to 6 months ago in the sense of the numbers are probably the same, but the magnitude of the decommits are different. And if you go back 3 to 6 months, what we were seeing is decommits pushing out quarters at a time and sometimes not even reconfirming the quantities. Now we're talking about those quantities are showing up, but the impacts are days and weeks. So that's what we're seeing in our supply chain, but we made these bets a long time ago, Alex. And if others are trying to make them today, I can understand the difference.

Okay. Second question, if I could. You talked about your strategy around pricing, and I understand it. It makes sense. It's consistent with Ciena's strategy historically. Some of your competitors though, have been much more aggressive on price, particular at Cisco. They had multiple price increases. Have you seen a change in the pricing environment from the competition, whether it be Cisco, Nokia or some of the other vendors that are in the field that creating a little bit of a benefit to you in terms of share as well?

I think it's too early to tell on all of that to be honest, I mean. And I think some of these things get announced and a lot of it -- a lot of the sort of price increases that the people you talked about there are really in the enterprise space, which I think you've seen more aggressive price increases too. So I -- some of that bleeds across for sure. And as Jim talked about earlier, we're in an unprecedented environment from a price dynamic in the carrier and infrastructure space. I think that's pretty much playing through how we'd anticipate it. We have had some very constructive conversations with most of our -- with all of our major customers. They understand that situation, and we -- that will start to play through over the next 1 to 3 years. But we really haven't seen any massive changes in the competitive environment. It's really -- particularly right now, all of that is hidden by all of the constraints around supply. So it's more about, can you supply something than what the price is, frankly. And so it's going to take a little bit longer for that to play through. I would say this, though, given Scott's comments around the scale of the commitments that we've made to our supply chain and the step-up that we've taken in that a long period of time ago. Our guidance of 11% to 13% growth this year on revenues. The order backlog that we've shared with you, what's absolutely crystal clear is that we're going to be taking market share this year and beyond.

Your final question comes from the line of Samik Chatterjee with JPMorgan.

Just if I could start on gross margin and Jim, just wanted to see if I could get some color on you -- now reiterating the gross margin guide for the full year, which is great to see. But can you maybe share any quantification of what the impact from the supply chain cost or higher supply chain costs will continue to be on -- for the fiscal year? And the second part to that quickly is, how should I think about the better software that you had, driving the better gross margin in F 1Q, how should we think about that carrying forward to the full year? I know I understand it's a wide range, but is software now going to be doing better in terms of revenue for the full year than you imagined earlier because of the strong start? And does that flow through to the full year margins?

Yes. So I'm going to use some numbers here, and I think you ought to be really careful with these numbers because I have to in order to illustrate the point, right? The last time we've talked about our long-term gross margins before COVID, we centered them around 45% roughly. That's what we centered our view of gross margins. We then went through a COVID period of time in which capacity was the most in-demand quantity. And so therefore, our gross margins did go up quite nicely to the high 40s. We said, though, that they were going to get back to the -- once we got through the COVID period of capacity adds and get back to a more balanced mix of line systems and commons and photonics and capacity that we would naturally get back toward that mid-40s range. So where are we in all that? That's -- I think we're heading towards that period of time where we're back in that range. However, we guided this year to 43 to 46. Again, just taking the midpoint of the range, that's 44.5%. So you could sort of quantify that the effect of the extra costs in our supply chain based on that difference. Now I would caution you to not make any absolute judgments about this, but that's sort of in the range of where we are. Now the other thing that always has an effect on our margin is mix. And we -- it's a mix of the type of products, stages of the various projects that we have with our customers, software, all those things do impact our gross margin, and it's hard to call. But I'd say this, we've been pleased with the fact that we've been able to maintain gross margins in this sort of unprecedented period of cost increases. And we expect over time that we'll get back to something more like the long-range number that we had projected earlier and perhaps, better.

And are you thinking software -- how is your expectation for software case given the strong start?

Well, we had an unusually high quarter in Q1, but software is part of our strategy. We've invested pretty heavily in our Blue Planet mix. We've also added a lot of capabilities on the platform side with MCP. I think we have an industry-leading management system, and so yes, that's definitely going to be a higher percentage of our revenue. We think it's going to be a higher percentage of our revenue going forward and that will help with gross margin.

Thanks, Samik, and thanks, everyone. We appreciate it. Again, we expressed our care and concern for all the Ukranian people and our hope for a peaceful future. We look forward to seeing everyone at OFC. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.