Greetings, and welcome to the Clean Harbors First Quarter 2015 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Michael McDonald, General Counsel. Thank you. Mr. McDonald, you may begin.

Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. On the call with me are Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Alan S. McKim; Vice Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer, Jim Rutledge; and our SVP of Investor Relations, Jim Buckley. We've posted our slides for today's call to the Investor Relations section of our website. We invite you to open the file and follow the presentation along with us. Matters we are discussing today that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Participants are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements, which reflect management's opinions only as of this date, May 6, 2015. Information on the potential factors and risks that could affect the company's actual results of operations is included in our filings with the SEC. The company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to the forward-looking statements made in today's press release or this morning's call other than through SEC filings that will be made concerning this reporting period. In addition, I'd like to remind you that today's discussion will include references to non-GAAP measures. Clean Harbors believes that such information provides an additional measurement and consistent historical comparison of its performance. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is available in today's news release, which can be found on our website, cleanharbors.com, as well as in the appendix of today's presentation. And now I'd like to turn the call over to our CEO, Alan McKim. Alan?

Thanks, Michael, and good morning, everyone. Beginning on Slide [Audio Gap] the first quarter of 2015, down 13% year-over-year. While Oil and Gas Field Services and Lodging were responsible for the majority of the decline, currency translation, severe winter weather and base oil pricing also adversely affected our performance. First quarter adjusted EBITDA of $78.3 million came in below the guidance we provided to you on our Q4 call in late February, but those of you who have followed Clean Harbors for years know that March is what makes our first quarter. That's when our environmental business, which is seasonal, typically picks up. This year, the pace of that acceleration was slowed by the lingering effects of a cold and snowy winter in some areas of the country, which caused major project delays in parts of our business, including tech services. Meanwhile, Oil and Gas and Lodging continued to un-perform, which was only exasperated by the winter drilling season in Western Canada being significantly impacted by capital budget reductions and ongoing headwinds in the energy market. I'll now go through the segments in more detail, beginning on Slide 4 with tech services. Segment revenue and profits increased modestly from a year ago, but frankly, we expected more growth. One factor that affected this segment in Q1 was prices on some of the materials and other recyclable materials we sell. This included materials from our transformer services business, which recycles copper and other materials from our utility clients; and catalysts, which we recycle from our chemical and refinery clients from catalyst change-outs. The impact of lower commodity prices in this area was largely offset by an increase in overall drum volumes and more incremental gains from Safety-Kleen as well as another strong quarter in landfill volumes. Tech services achieved an incineration…

Thank you, Alan, and good morning, everyone. Starting on Slide 15. Let me briefly touch on our outside revenue by vertical in Q1. Refineries and Oil Sands was our largest vertical in the quarter, representing 14% of Q1 revenue. It is up 11% from a year ago, with a 24% increase in the U.S. due to some significant refinery project work. In Canada, activity in the Oil Sands remained somewhat muted. The chemical vertical accounted for 11% of total revenue in the quarter. Our base business remained solid, and our bulk business performed well. However, chemical revenue was down about 6% from the prior year as cold weather and timing affected several projects. The good news is that several large remediation projects are slated to kick off in Q2. General manufacturing accounted for 11%. Revenue from this vertical grew 9% year-over-year. The overall manufacturing sector remains strong, so we expect healthy growth the rest of the year through a good mix of projects and stable base business. Base oil, blenders and packagers, which represents 9% of Q1 revenue, was down nearly 30% from the prior year largely due to the decline in base oil pricing. Revenue from the automotive vertical was down about 5% from a year ago, affected by lower collection opportunities as well as the cold weather in the Eastern U.S. We have some good sales funnel opportunities in automotive dealerships and expect automotive to rebound. The next 2 verticals on the chart, oil and gas production and oil and gas exploration, were both off about 25% from the prior year based on the current energy environment. One of the smaller verticals I wanted to highlight this quarter is government, where we grew 32% from the prior year due to some project wins and sales in the Safety-Kleen…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Al Kaschalk with Wedbush.

Just first, an overall comment, if I may. It looks like with the new assets going into the carve-out that the underlying fundamentals and "the ongoing Clean Harbors businesses" performed relatively in line but, perhaps, even slightly better than your plan. I'm not sure if you want to comment on that, but just an observation as we look at what was a lot of moving parts in the quarter.

I'd probably think -- probably, a disappointment would be more on the industrial side, that we had a lot of booked turnaround work and we saw a lot of cancellations, particularly to do with the strike that was going on as the refinery worker strike expanded. And we saw a lot of planning and work that was due to happen pushed, and so those turnarounds have to take place. But I would say that would be the single biggest challenge that our industrial business had. And I think probably on the manufacturing side, with the port strike, we did see quite a bit of impact even with the port strike on some of our manufacturers. So some of the waste volumes that we were getting definitely got impacted from that -- those 2 significant things that happened in the quarter.

Yes. And the only thing I would add is that the weather clearly -- I believe that tech services would actually have been greater than where we were. So there's some pushes out to the rest of the year because of the weather -- severe winter weather that we had, particularly in Northeast in Canada.

A lot of office closings that happened, really, throughout the whole East.

But still, they did well, but...

Is it possible to, with those commentary, to shed some insight on which projects -- and this is more aggregate across the company, maybe in terms of within the guidance parameters, what you see now as "lost" or what is more delayed and, perhaps, still on track but the timing maybe a little less certain? I'm not sure if there's any way to provide that, and/or the currency impact in the quarter would be helpful.

I'll maybe start and let Jim add. But I would say it's one of the reasons why we're confident with our guidance, that we've got a lot of business contracted and pent up and a lot of demand we've got. Even in the Oil and Gas and Lodging business, we've got some contracts that have been signed. We're cautious even in that space with contracts because we've seen extreme measures being taken by our customers, even trying to cancel firm contracts. So we're trying to work with our customers. We understand that -- the issues that they're facing, with crude being half of what it was a year ago. So I would say we feel very good about the pent-up demand for our services. Jim, I don't know if you want to add any color to that.

No, absolutely. I think that a lot of the -- of what we saw, you will see pushed into the latter part of the year, and our backlog was good going into Q2. And maybe to put some numbers around this, you asked about foreign exchange and so forth. When I look at our revenues in Q1 and I try to break it up into the major buckets -- and here, I'm going to be at a high level here, so I'm not going to be real precise on these numbers but the major big movers. If you look at our revenues in the first quarter, the translation loss, just the translation year-over-year probably accounted for in the area of about $24 million. If you look at our base oil pricing just year-over-year, as you know, we saw about $1 in price declines from August through December last year. The effect of that year-over-year, Q1 to Q1, was about $23 million in base oil pricing. Then if you look year-over-year, Oil and Gas revenues were down about nearly $50 million, $48 million roughly, and that includes about $5 million of FX effect. And then Lodging was down about $23 million, including $4 million of FX effect. And then as Alan pointed out, the effect on Industrial and Field Services with the Oil Sands was probably about near $10 million, and that probably includes $1 million or $2 million of foreign exchange. So when you look at those, as far as translation, the base oil pricing, I think with the base oil pricing in SK oil, the fact that we brought down our PFO cost so much year-over-year, we're managing that spread very well. You don't see it all in Q1 because you're selling Q4 higher-priced inventory, so you have that inventory change to deal with. That was almost $20 million, by the way. It was nearly that, just to put a number around that. And then you look at the Oil and Gas and Lodging as a result of the energy environment that we have right now. That was really what was driving -- what was going on from last quarter to this quarter. And we're encouraged seeing the WTI up in the $60 million range. We think that, that bodes well for the markets here, particularly in the Oil Sands and some other of the plays that we're involved in in Oil and Gas, field services. But we're reluctant. We're not building any of that in, and we're not looking at that. But generally, $60 is a good place to be if there's not the volatility. If we stayed consistently there, that ought to bode well for our businesses. But we're not trying to add that credit for the rest of the year. So hopefully, those numbers help put some -- frame up some of the things that Alan just talked about.

Yes, very good. And my follow-up, if I may, then on that one question. On corporate costs in the quarter, it looked like there was some movement there. If you could shed any color on why that was lower and what you still think for the full year and if there's any other onetimers in the quarter.

Absolutely. Corporate costs, I mean, clearly, we have been reducing costs to offset some of the other things that we've been talking about. Clearly, the -- with the lower performance in the quarter, our incentive compensation was less, to the tune of $5 million to $6 million, somewhere in that range. But I still believe that the full year corporate costs will be roughly in the $140 million range for the full year and, perhaps, less than that as we continue to try to save costs there.

Our next question comes from the line of Adam Baumgarten with Macquarie.

It looks like base oil prices have remained pretty stable over the last few months, albeit at low levels. But crude oil prices have begun to increase. Do you see any risk to your Zero PFO strategy?

Go ahead, Jim.

It's all about managing the spread, and it's a great question. I think a lot of the services that we provide to our customers, being that this is -- and they are customers. We see them more as customers than suppliers of used motor oil. We service them. We quickly unload their tanks all across, in many cases, across the continent. So I believe a lot of the value of the services that we provide to that business remains, first and foremost, I think, in our relationship with them. And therefore, in managing that spread, we're not looking to immediately make changes to our PFO cost with the precise movements of crude oil because the service that we provide to those customers goes beyond just the Btu value of the product that we're taking away for them. So it's something that we're managing very closely. And certainly, the current environment helped us to get back on track to where it should be because, as you know, unprecedented -- the unprecedented departure of base oil pricing from crude pricing that we saw for the last couple of years, that has been a grind for us. We're finally helped by the currency -- by the energy markets. But we hope to see things get more in line between base oil pricing and crude oil pricing, and we hope to manage that spread very closely going forward.

Okay. And then just finally, can you talk about what sort of benefit you guys saw in SK Environmental from a margin perspective from lower diesel costs?

I don't know if I could give you a precise number on that. But there was definitely a savings on millions of gallons of diesel that we purchased. But the only thing I would alert you to is we do have fuel surcharges to our customers, and some of those -- and a lot of that does get passed through to our customers. But I would say, overall, because we run a lot of equipment that also uses diesel, it's not all transportation, there have been savings there. But if I was to venture a guess, it'd probably be somewhere in the $1 million or maybe less than $1 million if you're just talking about a quarter, but it's somewhere in that range. But I don't have a precise number on that.

The next question comes from the line of Michael Hoffman with Stifel. Michael Edward Hoffman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: If I looked at your guidance in February and you stripped away all of Oil and Gas and Lodging and your assumptions then and then you look at -- the guidance range stays the same, but you've got, clearly, revising Oil and Gas' contribution to it, am I correct that the net of that change, if I pull Oil and Gas out of both those numbers, the residual is bigger, it's better?

Yes, I would say that in general, Michael -- and maybe another way to look at it is if you look at the total of our segments, excluding Lodging and Oil and Gas, so that would include tech services, Industrial and Field Services, SK oil and SK Environmental, we expect that the EBITDA growth year-over-year would be between 6% and 7%. Probably closer to 7% growth year-over-year is the way we essentially look at it. But clearly, we've seen some big declines in the other 2 businesses that are offsetting some of that. I think that kind of gets to the point that you're making there.

I think, Michael, when you think about even Safety-Kleen this year both on the Environmental and Oil and Gas, we believe they're -- those businesses are really doing strong. They're doing well, and we're excited about how those businesses are coming together for us. And by getting our spread, as Jim talked about, under control, we're partway there, but we're not where we need to be. And so we're going to hold the line. And we know that we need to improve that spread and not improve it based on base oil going up but getting our spread under control as well as a good spread even with the recycled fuel oil market because not all of our oil is going into our base oil business. So I think we're doing really well, and I think that's showing up probably in our guidance there.

Absolutely. Michael Edward Hoffman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. I'm going to repeat it just so I'm clear that if Oil and Gas and Lodging had -- the accounts allowed you to treat that as discontinued for assets held for sale, you wouldn't have been walking guidance down?

No. Michael Edward Hoffman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Right. Okay. So that's, I think, a clear and important issue. Legacy assets are performing well x the stuff that is exiting stage right here [indiscernible].

But I would also say that the businesses that really are under pressure, there's a great business there. I mean, the facilities that we have, the assets we have -- I mean, there isn't anybody that's been untouched by the crash in crude oil, as you know, Michael. And I would say that we continue to be excited even in light of what we saw in the quarter, which was really unprecedented from what we've -- and we've been through a couple of these now, right? So this has really been unprecedented in regard to the severity of the price cuts and the severity of the capital that, literally, overnight, dried up. And so a lot of companies reacted, and there are billions, hundreds of billions of dollars taken out of the market because of what happened in this. So that is still a great business. We're just weathering the storm in it, and the team really has worked extremely hard as they weather this business right now. Michael Edward Hoffman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay, fair enough. You started the year with a target of around $150 million in free cash, much better working capital recovery in 1Q. I'm assuming you're reaffirming that number and maybe with a little upside given how much working capital you took out of daily operations.

Yes, I would say there's upside to that number. Yes. Michael Edward Hoffman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. And then there was a time that you had visibility in the legacy portfolio. And I call legacy being Technical Services, Industrial and Field Services and Safety-Kleen Environmental, that you could look forward and see sort of incremental volume coming at you, that more seasonal volume, and that tends to create the operating leverage in the business to -- 2Q through the remainder of the year. What's your view of that today?

Volumes obviously pick up in the second and third quarter. Those are our seasonally strong quarters. We're carrying about a $60 million deferred right now, which is essentially a lot of inventory and deferred revenue from parts washer services and what have you. But our services are up. Our volumes are up. I think people would feel, looking at the pipeline for those businesses, that it's a pretty strong business right now for us. Michael Edward Hoffman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. And then on the PFO, I appreciate you don't want to tip your hand from a competitor standpoint. But if I understood the model correctly, to have been flat EBITDA year-over-year you had to get down -- all the things being equal, the base oil didn't go back up, it's still $2.45, your selling prices for residuals, your transportation, all that stays the same. The only thing you controlled was the price for the oil. You had to get somewhere into the mid-$0.20 a gallon, that suggesting you're going to be up would mean that your -- pierce that $0.20 -- mid-$0.20 number, is that accurate?

Yes, we're close to 0, and in some cases, we've been working with customers, as I mentioned, more on the outlying areas where we have to charge because to get that delivered rate to our re-refineries or even to our terminals for RFO sales, we've got to look at the total cost, not just what we're paying for the oil but the quality of the oil and the cost of getting it there and processing it. And so we believe that the team is doing a good job, and we've put in some better systems and processes to help. We actually have changed our incentive plan effective the first month of the second quarter. And so we think that'll change and drive behavior. So we're getting there, Michael, but we're not where we want to be yet. Michael Edward Hoffman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Fair enough. And when I visited the plant in early February, in the conversations with the guys there, we had the sense that a bogey was delivered oil to the plant at $1 a gallon or better. How do you -- how close are we getting to that target?

Yes. And our posted rate is much lower than that to some of our plants. And I think that was Chicago maybe that you were speaking to. So we're significantly below that as our target, and we would expect that number to continue to come down because the spread that we've been talking about is still not where it needs to be, where both crude and base oil and RFO is today.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is coming from the line of Scott Levine with Imperial Capital.

So your last earnings call was in late February. You highlighted -- and guidance was given then. You highlighted some bad weather in March and deterioration in the oil businesses. And I'm just kind of wondering what -- where was the biggest delta specifically relative to your guidance. And have trends since stabilized in those areas, where maybe you have a higher degree of conviction in the guidance going forward now that we're in early May and maybe 5 weeks have passed since the end of the quarter?

So last week, we had the team in for 2 days to do full P&L reviews. We did a deep dive across the entire business and spent a considerable amount of time re-forecasting and looking at the business. And I think it's really what drove sort of the discussion here this morning as we're communicating it to you.

Got it. And maybe focusing specifically on the turnaround business, where it seems like maybe there's a little bit less growth this year but still healthy outlook. Was most of the -- is most of the downside versus what you initially expected there kind of tied with the strikes and, call it, onetime items that have since passed? And is the fundamental outlook or the factors that drove the optimistic fundamental outlook for that business this year essentially intact?

Yes, we believe so. In some cases, it wasn't simply just moving it from the first to the second quarter because, as you can imagine, not only does a lot of planning now have to be put back in place to do some of these 500-person turnarounds but also lining up all the contractors and kind of realigning the work schedules across the network. So some of that work is pushed off and even into the third quarter, but they're not canceled. We have seen one major shutdown where it was cut in half, where the other half is going to take place next year. So we've seen a little bit of that. But these customers and these maintenance requirements have to get done. But as you can imagine, particularly when crude was in the low 40s, mid-40s, there was a lot of panic going on with spending by our customer base out there.

Got it. And then one last, and I'm not sure if this was covered earlier or not. But in the press release, you say you expect to be at the low end for 2015 adjusted EBITDA. Should we be thinking more like $530 million? Or should we be more thinking $530 million to $550 million is kind of the new ZIP code for guidance for this year?

As we've mentioned that the energy-related businesses are driving us to the lower part of the guidance, I couldn't say exactly where we would land there. And certainly, seeing some stability in the price of crude, perhaps, could help. So it's kind of hard to predict that as we saw in Q1 the effect on the spending of our major customers in these -- in the Oil and Gas and Lodging areas. So it would be difficult for us to pinpoint that. I apologize that we can't do that right now.

It's fine. Basically favor the lower end of the range, I guess, is what I'm trying...

Yes, that's right. That's the way to look at it based on what I just said. Yes.

Our next question is coming from the line of Charles Redding with BB&T Capital Markets. Charles E. Redding - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: I was wondering if you could just talk a little more about the move to expand direct blended product sales. How should we think about the long-term opportunity here? And what are some of the next steps as you get through the pilot phase?

So today, we distribute our blended products to about 50 different distributors, and we want to continue to do that. We have good relationships, and many of those relationships, they, in turn, distribute directly to our customers for us. There are a number of markets where we also have customers that we have historically distributed directly to. And as you look at the infrastructure that the combined Clean Harbors and Safety-Kleen now has, there are several markets where it would be more efficient and we would be able to expand more if we service a lot of our existing, let's say, Safety-Kleen core environmental customers, which total over 200,000. And so as we look out over the next 3 years, we'd really like to get to that 80% blended level in our business. We really want to expand our blended business, and it would probably be broken down in the continuation of growth with our existing distribution network as well as the expansion of our direct sale business. So that's probably the number that you might want to measure us by. That 80% number is really where we'd like to get in the next 3 or 4 years. Charles E. Redding - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay, great. And then against -- in terms of general manufacturing, I realize this was up 9% in the quarter. Can you, perhaps, outline a few drivers here? And maybe how do you foresee, or do you foresee any lag impact here from pullback in industrial production?

I think manufacturing was up. I think chemical was probably the one that get impacted a little bit by the strike in the port. But yes, manufacturing -- Jim, did you want to touch on that?

Absolutely. Manufacturing is doing well at many of our clients, whether you're talking about -- we typically don't about specific clients. I'm sorry. When you talk about some of the major corporations across America, we have very good relations to the extent, certainly, any of the expansions are going on with the lower price of natural gas and a little bit more manufacturing that we're seeing in North America, I think you'll see us grow right with that. And it's not only the industrial but it's also the waste, the hazardous waste that they generate regularly in their business. So we're excited about that, and you're seeing some evidence of that in the first quarter there.

[Operator Instructions] Gentlemen, we have no additional questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back to management for closing comments.

Okay. Well, again, thanks again for joining us today. We really appreciate your questions and comments. We're going to be participating in several conferences and events in the next month here in Boston as well as in Las Vegas in conjunction with the WasteExpo, so we hope to see many of you at those events. Thanks very much.