Greetings, and welcome to the ClearPoint Neuro Inc. First Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation [Operator Instructions]. Comments made on this call may include statements that are forward-looking within the meaning of securities laws. These forward-looking statements may include, without limitation; statements related to anticipated industry trends, the company's plans, prospects and strategies, both preliminary and projected; the size of total addressable markets or the market opportunity for the company's products and services; and management's expectations, beliefs, estimates or projections regarding future results of operations. Actual results or trends could differ materially. The company undertakes no obligation to revise forward-looking statements for new information or future events. For more information, please refer to the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2023, which the company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before May 15, 2023. All of the company's filings may be obtained from the SEC or the company's Web site at www.clearpointneuro.com. I would now like to turn the conference over to Joe Burnett, Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you to all of the investors and analysts on today's call for being a part of the ClearPoint vision and journey. Our mission and our priority is to help patients restore quality of life for patients and their families who are suffering from some of the most debilitating neurological disorders imaginable. In the first quarter of 2023, we have continued to make progress across our four pillar growth strategy, including biologics and drug delivery, functional neurosurgery navigation, therapy and access products and in achieving global scale. Over the last couple of years, we have seen both the opportunity and the necessity to augment our strategy in light of dramatic changes to the cost of capital, supply chain constraints and volume of elective procedures. These strategic adjustments have included expanding preclinical services and capabilities for our pharma partners, entering the therapeutic device market with the Prism Laser Therapy System, and evolving our navigation platform beyond the MRI and into the operating room. These pivots have given us greater confidence in our growth strategy and have led us to commit to our new manufacturing facility, which gives us the room we require for growth in both products and services while deploying lean manufacturing principles. Our first quarter revenue performance keeps us on track to achieve our prior forecast of between $25 million and $27 million for the year, or a growth rate of 22% to 35% year over year. Our cash usage was also on plan for the quarter. And as in prior years, we expect the first half of 2023 cash usage from operations will be higher than the second half based on annual events like performance bonuses, NASDAQ listing fees, insurance and other expenses that typically take place in the first and second quarter. I will now turn the call over to Danilo, our CFO, to review our financial performance in the quarter. After which I will add some additional detail to our four pillar growth strategy. Danilo?

Thank you, Joe, and thank you all for joining us today. Looking at the first quarter 2023 results, total revenue was $5.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and $5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, which represents 8% growth versus the first quarter of 2022. Our revenue is made up of three components; biologics and drug delivery, functional neurosurgery navigation therapy, and capital equipment and software. Biologics and drug delivery revenue include sales of disposable products and services related to customer sponsored preclinical and clinical trials utilizing our products. Biologics and drug delivery revenue increased 24% to $2.7 million in the first quarter, up from $2.2 million in 2022. This increase was fueled by 60% increase in biologics and drug delivery to service revenue, partially offset by $0.3 million decrease in product revenue. Functional neurosurgery navigation revenue consists of commercial sales of disposable products services related to cases utilizing the ClearPoint system to deliver medical device therapy to the proper target. This revenue segment increased 5% to $2.4 million for the first quarter, up from $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2022. Capital equipment and software revenue consisting of sales of ClearPoint reusable hardware and software and of related services decreased 38% to $0.4 million in the first quarter from $0.6 million for the same period in 2022 as a result of fewer placement of ClearPoint Capital and Software. Gross margin for the first quarter 2023 was 59% as compared to a gross margin of 64% for the first quarter 2022. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to changes in overhead costs and other inventory costs as well as higher costs for biologics and drug delivery services. Research and development costs were $3 million for the three months ended March…

Thanks, Danilo. Q1 was a successful quarter for our team across our four pillar growth strategy, headlined by record revenue of $5.4 million and growth in our biologics and drug delivery business of 24%. Now let's break that progress down into our four growth pillars. First, biologics and drug delivery team continued at additional partners and services in the quarter [Technical Difficulty] partnerships remained that more than 50 despite some subtraction due to capitalization constraints of some of the smaller partners, as well as the pause of some programs. The vast majority of our partners, however, continue to move forward and we do expect to add new partners and programs aided by new routes of administration to additional targets for CNS delivery. An example is the new cell delivery device and IP licensed from UCSF and announced just weeks ago ahead of the AANS conference. We think of the direct infusion market for neuro biologics to fall into four buckets. The two buckets that we currently have partners in represent direct injection to the brain, including gene therapy and now cell therapy. In the future, we plan to demonstrate prototypes of two additional rapid administration, including spinal infusions and longer term indwelling catheters for treatments that take multiple days. Our plan is to be the leading device partner for infusion therapy to anywhere that a neurosurgeon may or want to go. Our existing partners continue to make progress as well, and we expect to initiate multiple new clinical trials and first patient dosings before the end of 2023. Importantly, our extension into preclinical services has transformed our relationship and duration of partnership, allowing us to work alongside pharma well before the first patient is enrolled. We have now signed our first milestone based agreement with a pharma partner whereby ClearPoint…

[Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Neil Chatterji from B. Riley.

This is [RP Sheppard] on for Neil. Just wondering if we can get an update -- you guys hear me?

Yes, we can hear you.

I was wondering if you guys could give us an update on how you're extended agreement with Philips for Maestro includes some of the fully automatic sub-nuclei segmentation for DBS procedures, and how that helps kind of expand into the operating room?

The first version of my Maestro that's clinically cleared today is more of a radiology tool. So it's not embedded into our navigation system itself. However, that's the next logical step, our regulatory strategy was to clear it as an individual product ad then our next submission would be to merge this together when we already have a product and predicate there on the market. So we expect in 2024 that Maestro will be part of our navigation software moving forward. After that, we are going to continue to add additional features. So one feature is exactly as you described, the sub-nuclei, which is something that the primary target that's used in many deep brain stimulation procedures. Today, a lot of different technologies are used to sort of find your way to the exact target or node in particular cases. Many surgeons believe that the sub-nuclei is the desired anatomical target for the lead of a DBS system. However, it's not something that's currently available and the surgeon has to draw it themselves or find it looking at the MRI scanner. So if we can automate that process that will make it more attractive and easier to see in the MRI space. The second step, which is a very, very important one that you brought up, is how do we translate that success into the operating room itself. So our current pathway is that we have also licensed the ability to use the auto segmentation tool on CT scans and not only MRI scan. So the workflow we see in the future is the patient will have prior MRI as they always do as part of their routine diagnostic workup. They would then do a live CT the day of the procedure and we would fuse those two images together. And because of Maestro's unique properties, we will be able to compare not just a couple fiducial points but actually the entire surface of those sub-cortical structures. So we believe that we are going to have a very, very accurate fusion algorithm that will take all of the power of Maestro in the MRI and still be able to apply that into the operating room in a pretty seamless fashion that honestly fits the way 90% plus of DBS procedures are done today in the operating room. So hopefully it's a lot of information there but hopefully that helps with your question.

And then a follow-up here kind of just staying with Maestro. And can you elaborate kind of on the benefits you expect to deliver from any scientific partnership and with integrating the gene therapy infusion tool with Maestro's brain model?

They are very complementary technologies. So NES or New England Scientific is effectively a biophysics modeling company. And what we do is we use the Maestro framework to find the anatomy. Think of that as the map itself, which is showing you where the different destinations are that you're trying to get to. What NES does is more of the modeling of how the therapy is going to impact that patient. So an example you gave on drug delivery, if I were to inject a certain viscosity of drug into this specific location, into this specific patient at this volume, where do I expect that drug to go? So can in fact predict an almost -- pre-plan an entire drug infusion procedure to help me decide what dose, what location, how many infusions I want to do, et cetera. So it's almost like where Maestro is giving us the map, NES is helping us to determine traffic patterns and flow, and how long it'll take to get to a certain destination. That's kind of a kind of a simple analogy.

And then maybe one more here. If you could give like maybe an update too on just the status of your glioblastoma -- can't even say it right now, sorry, trial, you have a kind of ongoing right now in Europe, that's evaluating the safety and feasibility of the Prism neuro laser Therapy System. Do you have like any color or update on that?

I think, in the first quarter, we reported that we completed the first five patients of the cohort and we've actually extended to another additional 10 patients under the same protocol. This study is like you said, it's designed to just really collect first in human data of the complete PRISM system and that data will one day be used as part of the submission for European approval. We were able to get US approval based on the 510(k) simply doing bench talk testing and preclinical work, and no actual clinical evidence was required or clinical enrollment. That's not the case for Europe under the EU MDR. So we are going to have to collect data in some combination of Europe as well as in the United States to be able to complete that submission. So it is a -- it's giving us great experience in tumor cases, which I can say of most of the procedures that ClearPoint does today, they're heavily weighted on the functional side of things and much less on the oncology side. So it's giving us some terrific experience and feedback with a couple of surgeons that appreciate some of the features and benefits of the Prism system.

We'll take our next question from Frank Takkinen from Lake Street Capital.

All the elements have been laid out, but I think it'd be kind of helpful to boil it down, Joe. I think maybe can you help us just bridge from this $25 million revenue run rate we're looking at for 2023 to the $50 million in the last quarter of 2025? Just what are the top three most important elements to get us there and how confident do you feel that we'll see progress within those this year?

Just to clarify one comment. By Q4 of 2025, we want to be on a $50 million run rate, not actually do $50 million in the quarter. So just to set expectations correctly here. But I think it's a great question and I think it's going to come in a number of different phases. So if you think about 2023, if we break it up into three years, for example, ‘23, ‘24, ‘25, I think the majority of growth this year is going to come from expanded partnerships and preclinical services, which you've already seen part of with the 24% growth in Q1. I continue to expect that to be our fastest grower at least from a dollar percentage here in 2023 and probably exiting 2023 at a much higher run rate than we are today. So think of 2023 growth coming from biologic services and the initiation of some clinical trials and new partnerships. 2024 could be a little bit different, right? There, a lot of the growth is likely going to come from our Laser Therapy System, where this year we're only in a limited market release. So maybe five to 10 centers by the end of the year. But specifically targeting centers, different scanners, different surgeons that do both oncology and functional neurosurgery, so that we can get kind of a broad base training material as kind of I said in the press release and in the prepared comments, so that we can start launching and going into a broader market release in 2024. So whereas revenue in 2023 directly from the laser system will be pretty muted based on a limited market release. 2024, we would expect to accelerate those penetrations. And then importantly, more and more laser catheters being used in each one of the sites. So growth in 2024 might actually be supplemented by the laser system. You get to 2025, that's when we expect to have completed the limited market release for our operating room navigation system and begin a full market release, where we're actually penetrating the OR, and that's more of a deep brain stimulation target where, as I mentioned, more than 90% of DBS procedures today are done in the OR. So this is going where the cases are. And I'd say we've had very positive feedback on initial prototypes relative to our research and development efforts. And as we prepare for that submission as well as limited market relates that might be a larger contributor to growth in 2025. So there is a staged approach. But as we outline those key pillars, we really see all three of those pillars firing by the end of 2025, which is what gives us confidence that we can get to that cash flow breakeven number by then.

Maybe just a follow-up on the 2024, mostly commentary around laser systems. I know it's early in the launch and I think I may have asked even a similar question last quarter, but I think it's an attractive opportunity. But can you just position your laser versus the other lasers on the market and rehash what you think are the key differentiators and why you think this is a right market for the taking?

Yes, there's two I'd really bring up and kind of bring to the top here, because there are some subtle differences as well. But number one system is what we describe as a non-cooled system, meaning that we do not need to push either saline or liquid CO2 or some other coolant into the catheter apparatus to keep the catheter and the temperature done. So it effectively serves as the traditional way to do these procedures as it serves as a heat sink and it kind of pulls heat away from the catheter so that it doesn't necessarily overheat. We don't require that because of the unique design of the tip of our device. So what that means is that we can deliver less energy and likely, although, we don't have data to prove it at this point, but our goal is to generate that data over time is that we think we can do faster. It's logical that we could do faster ablations as well, because you don't have that heat sink. So if you can do these ablations at lower cost and shorter times, we think that's a benefit. Not to mention the simplicity itself. Anytime you're hooking something up to a pump or a CO2 device or something like that, not only is the installation more difficult, because sometimes you have to build it physically into the room, but it's just one more thing that can go wrong during a procedure. And some of these procedures could be two hours, four hours, six hours. We've been in procedures even longer than that. The last thing you want, you want to simplify it as much as you can, and we believe we have a very, very simple system. So I think that's one key benefit. The second one is the expertise of our team as well. We are not new to this space. We have been navigating laser procedures for quite some time. We have been able to sort of listen to the request of what surgeons would like to see different and done differently, whether it's the laser itself, the software, the thermometry, and the navigation et cetera. So we are kind of in a unique position to deploy all of that different learning into a complete system, which comes with a companion being the actual ClearPoint clinical specialist. So think of it as - in a lot of cases, today, there might be a hand off between someone doing the navigation and helping versus someone helping with the therapy itself. With ClearPoint, you will be able to do the entire procedure with one person assisting the entire way, and that's something that again our surgeons have told us is a big advantage. So those are the two I would lean on that I think I would bring to the top of the importance list.

[Operator Instructions] And there appear to be no further questions at this time. I'll turn the floor back over to Mr. Burnett for closing remarks.

Thank you, Karen. And once again, thank you to everyone interested in being a part of our team's journey here at ClearPoint. As a team, we have never been more excited about our strategy and vision as we are today. We look forward to continue to update you on all of this progress in the months and years ahead. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a great day.