Greetings. Welcome to Columbus McKinnon’s Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded.I will now turn the conference over to your host, Deborah Pawlowski, Investor Relations for Columbus McKinnon. Thank you. You may begin.

Thanks, Sherry and good morning, everyone. We certainly appreciate your time today and your interest in Columbus McKinnon. Here with me are; Rick Fleming, our Chairman and Interim CEO. As you are likely aware, Rick was appointed Interim CEO effective January, 10 with the departure of our former CEO, Mark Morelli, who is now the CEO of Vontier. Also here with us is Greg Rustowicz, our Chief Financial Officer.You should have a copy of the third quarter fiscal 2020 financial results which we released this morning before the market. And if not, you can access the release as well as the slides that will accompany our conversation today at our website, cmworks.com. If you’ll turn to Slide 2 in the deck, I will first review the Safe Harbor statement. You should be aware that we may make some forward-looking statements during the formal discussions as well as during the Q&A session.These statements apply to future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties as well as other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is stated here today. These risks and uncertainties and other factors are provided in the earnings release as well as with other documents files with Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents can be found on our website or at www.sec.gov.During today’s call, we will also discuss some non-GAAP financial measures. We believe those will be useful in evaluating our performance. You should not consider the presentation of additional information in isolation, or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have provided reconciliation of non-GAAP measures with comparable GAAP measures in the tables that accompany today’s release and the slides for your information.So with that, if you would turn to Slide 3, I will turn it over to Rick to begin. Rick?

Thank you, Deb. I’m pleased to be joining all of you today. Let me take a moment to introduce myself. I’ve been with Columbus McKinnon as a Director for almost two decades. So I’m quite familiar with the company, its products and its markets. Before my retirement from USG Corporation in 2012, I was an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. USG had about $3.2 billion in revenues at that time.I was USG’s CFO for about 18 years and I was an employee of the company for its subsidiary, Masonite Corporation for approximately 38 years. So, most of my career has been spent in the building material and construction industry. I’m currently a Director of Boise Cascade Company which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, as well as O.E. Holdings a private company.Well, my role as the Interim CEO of Columbus McKinnon was not expected. I’m honored to be leading this team, while we are conducting our search for a new CEO. These are exciting times at Columbus McKinnon. We have a solid and motivated leadership team at the helm. We are delivering on our promises. And we have excellent momentum with our blueprint for growth strategy. In short, our future is bright.So with that, let’s turn to our review of the quarter. We have deployed our blueprint for growth strategy for about three years and the solid results of our third quarter demonstrate its continued effectiveness. Margins expanded and earnings and return on invested capital increased despite the headwinds related to the new traction of the industrial market.Even though we experienced lower volumes, we achieved our 11th consecutive quarter of year-over-year of margin expansion with our gross margins increasing 20 basis points to 34%. Diluted earnings per share were $0.63 and adjusted earnings per share grew…

Thank you, Rick. Good morning, everyone. On Slide 6, net sales in the third quarter were a $199.4 million. As you know, we completed three divestitures last fiscal year, which reduced sales this quarter by $9 million compared to last year. Foreign currency also contribute – continued as a headwind and reduced our sales by $1.7 million.Adjusted for FX in the divestitures, we saw sales volume declined by $10.6 million or 5.2%. While volume was down, our pricing power was evident as we saw pricing improved by 1.6%, which was the same amount as last quarter. But half of this pricing was a result of our 80/20 strategic pricing initiatives.Let me provide a little color regarding sales by region. For the third quarter, we saw sales volume decline in the US by 4.2%. This was partially offset by price increases of 1.7%. Sales outside of the US were down 6.5% adjusting for the FX of divestitures.Solid price improvement of 1.4% partially offset a volume decline of 6.2%. Sales volume was down in EMEA, Latin America and Canada, but up in the APAC region as result of a large rail project. The weakness we saw in EMEA was in both our short cycle and project businesses.Let’s now review orders and backlog. Our short cycle business continued to be affected by the contraction of industrial markets. This headwind impacted our project business during the December quarter as well.Adjusted for divestitures, orders were down year-over-year by 9.5% overall. It is important to note, that quoting activity remains high in both the number of quotes and dollar value, but our senses is that projects are being somewhat delayed, especially in the US. As a result, backlog was reduced to $125 million at the end of December.While the markets are certainly a headwind, we believe…

Thanks, Greg. I would now like to discuss our fourth quarter fiscal ‘20 outlook. Concept for our businesses short cycle is our policy to give top line guys only one quarter out. Right now, based on a continuing softness in the manufacturing economy and our order trends and backlog as we entered the fourth quarter.We expected our Q4 revenue will be essentially flat with a third quarter and in the range of $196 million to $201 million. This level implies a reduction of 5% to 7% from the fourth quarter of last year. But I want to assure you that we are working hard to mitigate these headwinds on both our top and bottom lines and to continue to deliver strong performance during the slowdown.Finally as we mentioned that there are a few early indications that suggest market conditions are starting to improve for fiscal ‘21. For example, we recently received a large automation system order, a large crane order and several rail project orders. It is too early to call as a trend, but does suggest that competence levels maybe firming. Having said that, we’re not waiting for the recovery, as mentioned, it is our job to maximize our performance under any and all economic conditions.Here are a few examples of what I’m talking about. We completed the closure of our China facility at the end of December ahead of schedule. We expect about $1 million in annualized savings beginning in the fourth quarter from that effort. We are on track with the closure of our second facility in Ohio by the end of the first quarter of fiscal ‘21. There’ll be an additional $5 million in annualized savings when that is completed.As implementing the blueprint for growth strategy, we have reduced the number of facilities by 6, from…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Mike Shlisky with Dougherty & Company. Please proceed.

Good morning, everybody. Mike Slishky here. So, want to first ask about the 80/20 benefit for the fourth quarter. I appreciate that you maintained your outlook for the full year, but I mean, that implies that based on the first few quarters, the benefits will actually slowdown in the fourth quarter you know, below the $5 million we just got in the third quarter. So can we hear on some of the major moving parts three and is there any potential for some upside in the fourth quarter?

Yeah. Hi, Mike it’s Greg. So, we did have, as you know, we measure it on an incremental basis, so year-over-year. So we have no – in the fourth quarter, we didn’t have any carryover impact from the previous year. So this is all new activities that we expect. I would think that there could be some upside opportunity for us to exceed the $18 million targeted 80/20 savings.

Okay, great. I also want to ask about your RSG&A outlook for the fourth quarter. In that number, is there some placeholder for a new CEO, that person’s salary and you know, benefits and stock grants in the fourth quarter or is that an area that you have not holding account for?

There’s no placeholder for – this is Rick Fleming, there’s no placeholder, Mike for a new CEO in the fourth quarter, but clearly that will be something to be considered in fiscal ‘21. And having said that, I as Interim CEO, my compensation is being charged during the fourth quarter. And half of my compensation by the way is in stock.

And, Mike let me just add on too, so there are other costs involved as well like executive search costs. So we did incur some of those in the fiscal third quarter and we’ll have more of that in the fiscal fourth quarter and that’s taken into account in the guidance.

That – so that’s included, not [technical difficulty] okay, perfect. Just one last one for me and then I’ll hop back in the queue. Wanted to ask about one of the talks of the day again that the issues in China on the coronavirus. Just can you just on your thoughts as to whether anyone from Columbus has been affected by that, whether your business has changed at all in China due to that and your facilities over there, are they still operating at the current time?

Well, that’s a great question, Mike. First, let me say that we’re pleased to our knowledge none of our team has been impacted by the virus itself. We have taken the same precaution as many companies have to effectively halt travel to China by team members and those in China have been asked during the lunar holidays to work from home, our factory in Hangzhou is shut down currently, but we expect it will reopen around February 10th, but having said that, it’s kind of being watched on it, as you can appreciate a day-by-day basis.Stepping back and looking at the bigger picture, I think we all have been grappling with the uncertainty associated with this epidemic. And right now, I’m sure you’ve had the same experience I’ve had, where we look at the newspaper and we see 800 cases go to 1,000 go to 5,000 go to 9,000 go to 17,000 go to 20,000. And so it’s really a situation that’s evolving as we speak, and evolving both in terms of our knowledge of this very disease as well as it’s building to infect population. So, we clearly have to take that uncertainty into account.Having said all that, as you know, China is a relatively small part of Columbus McKinnon in total, and that, if you just looked at the – what we know, today in terms of the factory shut down and with the expectation that we’ll be getting back to business in the latter part of February, we looked at about $0.5 million of revenue impact in the fourth quarter, but I think it’s in fairness we have to stay to be continued and we’re watching it very closely.

Okay, thanks very much. I will hop back in the queue.

Our next question is from Chris Howe with Barrington Research. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Chris.

Good morning.

Good morning. I wanted to dive a little bit deeper into phase three. As we consider the search for a new CEO, in the interim, can you comment on just the underlying activity that you’re seeing within M&A candidates and perhaps how that’s developed over the course of the past six months? And as we assess phase three, and we move towards your target of 19% EBITDA margin in fiscal year 2022, is there the potential for upside to this margin target as you look towards automation or other opportunities?

Well thanks, Chris. This is Rick Fleming. That’s a very good question. First, let me say that we have not paused our activity on phase three that we have been conducting which, as Mark explained I’m sure in previous calls, has been largely associated with us thinking through in a thoughtful and really quantitative matter as well as qualitative, our criteria for looking at opportunities in phase three from an M&A standpoint, as well as thinking through our costs, these, our adjacencies that are of interest getting market research on adjacent opportunities and really conducted as mentioned, literally a strategic review.And I think Mark has contrasted that in the past to what the company did and perhaps many companies do, where you’re more opportunistic about your M&A thought process. And as I try to emphasize, this is really more strategic.So as part of that, a lot of dialogue, a lot of looking at opportunities, a lot of reading, if you will, with the possibility some early on conversations with possible companies. We have noticed you know just do the economic circumstances in one or two cases. There may have been interest previously by a potential target that now they’ve kind of putting on the back burner till things settle down in the industrial market. So it’s fair to say right now most of the work is planning oriented.The new CEO will really have the benefit when he comes in or she comes in to have a lot of that work in place. And as mentioned, we are looking for an individual that has really the background and as well as the opportunity to grow Columbus McKinnon in addition being a solid operator.

Yeah. Hey, Chris, it’s Greg. Let me add on to it. So as we think about phase three and acquisitions, we’ve centered on really two major themes. One being a Lifting Specialist and the other is Smart Movement. So we’ve identified and have a pipeline of over 400 companies that were evaluating against this criteria and doing a screening process.Now, once we do identify those, then, an outreach begins. So this is a bit of a different approach than just taking inbound calls from investment bankers. This is really more of an outreach programmatic approach. So we’re going to continue forward with that strategy and as you can appreciate, it’s very difficult to predict timing. But clearly the balance sheet is in great shape. And you know, we’re optimistic that we will see the fruits of our labor here sometime in the next fiscal year.

And has the pricing environment at all shifted versus your prior expectations or any comments there?

Yeah, so multiples are very rich right now, for sure. And that’s something that as we think about M&A, you know, the one thing you can’t change about a deal is the price you pay for that. And so it’s very important that we buy smart and that we have opportunities that either provide the technology we’re looking for or have outstanding synergy capabilities for us.

And in addition to multiples being a variable, EBITDA has been a variable and some companies that we have been in dialogue with are actually hit the pause button, because I think they have some internal issues because they’re taking through relative to their EBITDA.

Okay. That’s all very helpful. And just didn’t want it to be overlooked. Could you provide some more color on this large automation deal as well as this large crane order, more specifically, the automation deal and perhaps the size of the deal and how the pricing was there and how we could expect automation or other innovative opportunities to play into your margin expectations as we move into next fiscal year?

Well, first I’ll start and then Greg can jump in. But, first let me say that the automation center for excellence is still being staffed up. We are putting people in place. We are creating if you will, the operating systems and getting the management team in place.But having said all that, we were very pleased to get the order I’ve mentioned, which is about $600,000. And more to come, I mean, the quoting activities is built nicely in that area. So we’re encouraged so far and month of January was sort of a proof point that we’re on the right track.Do you want to add to that, Greg?

Yeah, so you know that’s clearly an area that we believe has higher margins than our average business. So to the extent, we can drive our automation activities and grow them substantially that will help our overall gross margin profile.

Okay, thanks for the color. That’s all I have for right now. Appreciate it.

Our next question is from Greg Palm with Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please proceed.

All right, thanks and good morning to everybody there. Maybe just starting out with a little bit of commentary on the macro itself. Any commentary on the end markets and specifically sounds like you know, kind of project-based business, you know, fell down. I know that was a little bit stronger this past fiscal year. So can you just talk about sort of the differences and what you’re seeing out there?

Sure. Well, December was obviously a period where we had a decline in orders and we also saw a somewhat of a decline in hoist been turned into orders due to the overall industrial caution on the marketplace. To give you a sense for the order pattern I think this may be helpful. November orders were about 90% of October level and December orders about 84% of October – November – of October level, excuse me.So with that as the backdrop, January however has seen an uptick in orders it’s relatively small, but positive, about 1% and nonetheless up and that’s good. I would say the important thing is to look at the short cycle which had been really the weaker part of our book of business and that’s up a 11% it is the project side down 9% that continues now to be softening and maybe will take a while to firm up.But when you then look at the next level of data, which is closed, you do see some bright spots even on the project side as we speak. Europe has seen a pretty good activity in the quote area. Asia is still very soft as you can appreciate. North America however it’s picking up and particularly in several verticals. Steel in North America has started to pick up after a seasonal slowdown in December. Construction, utility power generation and government segments are relatively strong and waste energy activities picking up.So, we feel pretty good about how things are starting to normalize. I had a chance to meet with our sales team the other day, we got some feedback on just what many of our top 10 customers are saying, and the word that came back was basically that we seem to be stabilizing at this lower level. And the good news is, we’re not seeing further decline. It looks like things are trying to slowly, but surely move in the right direction. So it’s early January, basically now moving into February, but we see some green shoots and positive signs.

Okay, great. That’s really helpful. So thinking about the top line guidance, specifically for the March quarter then you know, are you – maybe some, what are the underlying assumptions behind that? Is it that you know, it falls off again in February and March, because it’s on a reconcile your comments on January than looking at the specific guidance for the quarter?

Yeah, so like what really drove us to it is the fact, that orders were down in the quarter by about just under 9% when you adjust for the divestitures and FX. And so we’re starting the quarter with a backlog of about $125 million, which is down about 12% sequentially from where it was in September.So, you know, what it really implies is that the book and build business picks up in the fourth quarter, which we typically do see a bit of an uptick, you know, people buying in advance of price increases in the US and we have some incentive programs for our larger customers that incent them to buy inventory and get it on the shelves for the for the summer season.So we think that our guidance of down 5% to 7%, given where we are with our backlog is really prudent guidance for the quarter.

Yeah and I think one way to think about it is that, in the fourth quarter, we still have a declining project business based on the order trends that we saw on the backlog and we do expect an improvement in short cycle business.As Greg mentioned, a lot of that often comes about because of pre-buying before a price increase or our partners in performance programs, and then maybe a general firm you know, of industrial samplings. But having said that, the two centers sort of offset each other and that’s what we end up with kind of a flattish view for the fourth quarter versus the third.

Got it, makes sense. And then just kind of shifting gears to the EBITDA margin targets for fiscal ‘22. What are the underlying macro assumptions behind that? I mean, do we have to get some pickup in growth between now and then in order to achieve those targets?

Yeah, so when we set the 19% EBITDA target in fiscal ‘22, as you recall, we originally came out with a 15% target, but we got there in a year, and certainly we had some benefits over the last two years on the top line with kind of mid-to-high single-digit growth. So the presumption is that, the 19% was achievable with – in kind of a low growth GDP kind of environment.So, we clearly are working hard on the margin side with both, 80/20, operational excellence footprint consolidation, and then just really trying to lift the margins of our business with investments, the new product development, automation that Rick spoke about as well. So, you know, this year, we are going to end – should end north of 16% or right around 16% where 16.1% on a year-to-date basis. So we’ve got – still have a little bit of a gap to close, but we’ve got two years to do it. And, you know, we’re not giving up on that goal and we think that’s an achievable number for us, but it does not assume that there is a downturn or a recession.

Got it. And the delta between the 16% and the 19%, does the majority of that come from gross margin expansion from here?

Yes.

Yeah.

Yep. And you’ll see it in the 80/20 and the operational excellence categories.

Yep. Okay, all right. That’s it for me. Thanks.

Thank you.

Our next question is from Jon Tanwanteng with CJS Securities. Please proceed.

Good morning, gentlemen. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe to start, the growth in operating margins as we head into Q4, given roughly flat expectations for revenue, are they biased to the upside or downside and kind of what are the puts and takes going into that?

Well, I would say, Jon, that, you know, we did take inventories down $7 million sequentially from September to December, and that had an impact on our gross margin. And we also saw a negative $1.1 million impact due to higher medical costs. And with our medical plans, in essence, they reset January 1st of every year, their high deductible plans. So we would expect there to be positive gross margin relative in Q4, relative to Q3. I think the RSG&A guidance is about the same as it was. I mean, it was a little bit lower this quarter. But, you know, we think the $45 million to $45.5 million level is kind of the right landing spot for Q4.

Great, thank you very much. And then you also mentioned, you know, additional activities and realignments going on under the hood. I know that 80/20 plan hasn’t been, you know, implemented across all your geographies and product lines. So what kind of further accretion could we see in fiscal ‘21 above the $18 million that you plan to realize in ‘20?

Well, as you can appreciate, we’re working on our budget for fiscal ‘21 right now and we’re in discussion with our business units on that very topic. Having said that, there are a number of deficiencies that we are working on, our early view is that, could be something in the area of $9 million of loan. And then in addition, we are looking at additional 80/20 opportunities but that are still in discussion. I think our hope and our desire is that, we will have pretty good numbers similar to what we had in the past going into that budget cycle.

Yeah, let me give you a little bit more color, Jon to just to remind everybody on the phone that, we do – we will have the consolidation of our Lisbon, Ohio facility done in the first quarter. And that’s about a $5 million annualized savings number, we won’t get all of those savings this coming fiscal year, but that’s a big accretive number for us as we you know, reduce our footprint. And the one thing, the management team is absolutely committed to, is driving double-digit earnings growth. And so we’re looking at developing a plan that does that.

Great, thank you. And then in future, after you close the two plants, is there room for more consolidation? Are you at the asset basement size that you want to be –

Well there is definitely room for more consolidation. And I can’t give specifics as you can appreciate that would be premature. We have a lot of discussion to internally, but we see opportunity. Let me put it that way, not only in the US, but overseas.

Okay, great. Thank you. And then just finally on the CEO search. I assume there hasn’t been any appreciable significant impact, but how is anything – if anything, has there been any change in the morale or the – in the operations of the company due to Mark leaving?

No, the team is intact. Morale is good. As you can appreciate one of my first orders of business was to meet with each individual team member and I feel really good about the conversations. And I’ll be with the team next week in Charlotte as we go through our planning for the budget. I can just say right now it’s all positive and I appreciate that really the work and the support of the team you know, our mantra internally has been same strategy, same team and same results. And that’s what we’re working on.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question is from Walter Liptak with Seaport Global. Please proceed.

Hi, thanks. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Walt.

Wanted to, you know, it’s good to hear about the green shoots. And so I want to ask one more question on that. And you know, as you were talking about you know, these projects and some of the short cycle, specifically where are you seeing the green shoots on the geographic base, certainly US or Europe or where do you think that we get things coming back? What region first?

North America is where we’ve seen really a more of a firming, if you will, and an activity for quotes and it’s really on signs that we’re getting quotes turned into orders. So that – that’s basically the major focal point of my comments. Asia up in the air right now with coronavirus, clearly. And then Europe you know, some of our project business in Europe, particularly as it relates to Mideast oil and gas. So pretty good. So but I’d say North America has been the early area for the green shoots.

Okay, good. And then you know, thinking about the work that you’re doing from 80/20. If I recall, the US was started first, and followed by international. And so my question is, in the non-US sales, was there some of that decline related to PLS and some of the 80/20 activity or you know, maybe if you could help us understand how much of this client was divestiture relate – or related to market versus kind of internal improvements [indiscernible]?

Yeah. So when we think about sales outside of the US, we did see volume declines of about, you know, $6 million in total or roughly 6.2%. And where we saw the larger volume declines was EMEA was double-digits, Latin America was double-digits. We had a little bit of – we saw some nice growth in APAC, but that’s off of a small base and Canada was down a little bit as well.So the 80/20 impact, I would say, were not in Europe, specific to your question. We are not yet seen a negative impact due to product line simplification. I think there is, you know, that is – that work is underway and it’s being looked at, but that particular part of the 80/20 Process takes a little bit longer.

Okay, got it. And then the last one for me you know, I think we’re all very impressed with the E-PAS strategy. And what you guys are doing is impressive with the margins, the profits coming up you know, revenue down or the profit split. And as you’re doing the CEO search as the boards going through this, it sounds based on the information that you gave like, you’re getting high interest and the CEO that the board is going to pick is someone who can fit into the E-PAS strategy.And I want to make sure I understand that that’s kind of the, you know, the focus of the search is not changing the E-PAS strategy and that CEOs that are in the running, you know, understand this and that they are, you know, accepting of it, because usually the CEO tries to imprint his own, you know, business plan onto a company.

Rick Fleming, again. I’ll be happy to give you some additional information. Let me first kind of set the table on where we are in the search process and then after I’ll answer your question more directly, but just to give you a sense that we hit the ground running basically before Christmas, we had hired our search firm, Korn Ferry, who also did the search for Mark Morelli. And we got our specification documents completed in terms of what we’re looking for and out in the marketplace.So we moved pretty fast as you can appreciate in December before the holidays. And we’ve been having number of calls with our search firm, literally every week and are now scheduled as I alluded to that have our first round of interviews with some candidates who’ve risen to the top in – by mid-February.So it’s early in the process still, I mean, often as you can appreciate, you have several rounds of interviews we have got in, and you certainly have other people that come into the process after the first wave. But we feel pretty good that we’re on track to get somebody on board as we’ve all said within six months and my gut says sooner and we’re certainly working on that.Now, what kind of individual we’re looking for? You know as you can appreciate, we are very pleased with the 80/20 Process, we’re very pleased with the disciplines that have brought to the company. And we certainly want that to be part of the new individual’s portfolio. But we also want, as I alluded to, an individual that also has experienced growing companies, both organically and through M&A and portfolio optimization, and you’ll probably have a smile on your face when I say, here’s a laundry list of what we’re looking for, because it almost sounds like the perfect individual, but there are people out there that can touch a lot of these bases.So let me do this review that we’re looking for people that have strategy development, experienced operational excellence, as I mentioned, organic growth with a commercial track record of growing businesses, people understand mergers and alliances, steep experience at leading with dedication, due diligence, negotiation of potential acquisitions and joint ventures, global accountability, we are a global firm, that person has to have the opportunity and background with that experience with that aspect of running the company, mobile operating units, new markets channels, innovation and on an anomaly leadership, which is talent management and attracting and developing the right talent in the team. So it’s a long list, but we are pleased with what we’re seeing so far. And we’ve got, as I mentioned, a pretty high level of interest, so more to come on it.

Okay, thanks for the detail on that and good luck with the search.

Thank you.

Our next question is from Joe Mondillo with Sidoti and Company. Please proceed.

Hi, guys. Good morning.

Good morning, Joe.

Good morning, Joe.

Most of my questions have been answered, but just a couple maybe a follow-up question to some of the comments you’ve made. The $9 million of savings that you sort of roughly estimated for next year, did that – is that including the China and Ohio’s facility closures?

Yeah. So when we think about – we haven’t fully formed all of our plans yet for 80/20. But clearly as we think about our budget for next year, we would expect, yes, we are going to include roughly $5 million from the facility consolidations.

Yeah, that – and that is absolutely correct. And having said that, we’re going to drive the number of hires.

Yeah.

Okay. So just to clarify those comments that you made $9 million includes the facility closures and then potentially some additional 80/20 savings that you haven’t exactly determined at this point?

Yeah. Greg is actually correct, $5 million of the savings in 2021 comes from the Ohio facility closure. Now in my capacity as leading the team, we’re looking for $9 million as well.

Okay. And I just wanted to also clarify the comments that you made on sort of January business trends. You stated that orders were up 1%. Is that a 1% year-over-year change?

It is.

Yes.

Adjusted, Joe for divestitures and FX.

Yes.

Right, okay. And then one thing that was not touched on exactly was pricing, I’m just curious, given sort of the weaker trends or some of the slowing in the, just the end markets overall, what kind of pricing you think you’ll get going forward?

Yeah, so what we’ve got in the quarter and year-to-date is about 1.6% price, and that includes about half of that is 80/20 related, so call that strategic pricing where you’re surgically going in and raising prices on certain products that you sell. So, in the upcoming year, we think it’s going to be somewhat of a weaker environment. But nonetheless, we would expect positive price and we’ve historically have had price exceed inflation. So I think it’s going to be probably in a similar sort of a level –

In industrial products in North America went out their price increase for February.

So they’re about a month earlier than they have been historically.

Okay, great. Thanks a lot. Just lastly, you stated that your search cost for the new CEO was baked into the SG&A guide for the fourth quarter. How much do you have baked in there for that?

Yeah, so it’s in the neighborhood of a $0.25 million.

Okay. All right, great. Thanks a lot.

And our next question is a follow-up from Greg Palm with Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please proceed.

Yeah, thanks. One last one on capital allocation I guess you’re generating massive amounts of free cash flow here. And it sounds like M&A will become a big focus here, especially with the eventual appointment of a new CEO. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong, but my guess is that, you could buy back your own stock at current levels at a much cheaper price or I guess, valuation and doing any M&A especially if prices for potential targets remain elevated. So I guess my question is, at some point do you approach share repurchases differently? And if that’s not the case, why won’t you?

Yeah. So we have – so we thought about it similar to you, Greg, and that we didn’t have that ability in the past, but the board recently authorized the $20 million share repurchase authorization earlier in the fiscal year and we look at it as more of an opportunistic lever for us. You know, our focus has been on de-levering this year and we said we would de-lever $65 million and we will do that, we’re planning to do that. And clearly our balance sheet is, you know, below our targeted leverage ratio.But the other factor we think about as in regards to share repurchase, is that, our float is quite low. And you know, so we really would look at share purchases more from an opportunistic perspective, if for some reason there was an anomaly in the capital markets and our price dropped to a level that just didn’t make sense, we could see that as you know, an opportunity to go back in and perhaps offset some of the dilution that we have every year from our, how to plan.

And let me just mention too, Greg that, we will be having a discussion as we do each year at our March Board Meeting on capital allocation. And it will be a priority this year to have that discussion because of the fact that our cash flow generation has been so positive and so ahead of schedule. So in a bit – a good way to summarize it, is it’s under discussion right now.

Okay.

And it’s a good problem to have.

It’s a good problem to have, right.

Yeah.

And we all go back to this and it was implicit in Greg’s comments. Our highest and best return is investing in our company either through capital spending and opportunities to reduce cost or through organic growth and obviously inorganic growth and – gets in that equation as well.

Yep, makes sense. I mean, can you give us any sense for what your, you know, valuation criteria might be when looking at M&A going out or is it really going to be kind of a case-by-case basis?

Yeah, it’s going to have to be a case-by-case basis, you know, as you think about lifting specialist, a STAHL acquisition with that category as you think about Smart Movement, a Magnetek acquisition fit that categories. So you know, they each have different profiles from a business perspective on the Smart Movement, there could be a smaller company that offers the right sort of technology that would allow us to move forward much quicker than developing a technology by ourselves. So it’s going to be a case-by-case for us.

I mean, in general, how do you create value, growth and return on capital.

All right. Thanks.

Thank you.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session, I would like to turn the call back over to management for closing remarks.

Well, thank you very much for your continued interest in Columbus McKinnon Corporation. We really appreciate the chance to share with you our performance for the quarter and our outlook, and have a nice day.

Thank you. This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and thank you for your participation.