Greetings, and welcome to Cinemark Holdings Inc. First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ms. Chanda Brashears, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you, Ms. Brashears, you may begin.

Good morning, everyone. I would like to welcome you to Cinemark Holdings, Inc.'s First Quarter 2024 Earnings Release Conference Call hosted by Sean Gamble, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Melissa Thomas, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that statements or comments made on this conference call may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not necessarily limited to, financial projections or other statements of the company's plans, objectives, expectations or intentions. These matters involve certain risks and uncertainties. The company's actual results may materially differ from forward-looking projections due to a variety of factors. Information concerning the factors that could cause results to differ materially is contained in the company's most recently filed 10-K. Also, today's call may include non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the company's most recently filed earnings release, 10-Q and on the company's website at ir.cinemark.com. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Sean Gamble.

Thank you, Chanda, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today to discuss our first quarter 2024 results. Over the past 3 years, the theatrical exhibition industry has seen meaningful year-over-year increases in attendance and box office as film volume has been rebounding following the shutdown of moviemaking during the pandemic. And as we indicated last quarter, while this year, we'll likely experience a dip in that recovery trajectory due to over 6 months of Hollywood strikes last year that again disrupted film production, 2024 kicked off to a better-than-expected start. First quarter North American industry box office declined only modestly versus 2023 on account of a wide range of films that delivered outsized results. Examples include Sci-Fi sensation Doom Part 2 that outgrows its first installment by more than 2.5x with over $275 million of domestic box office. Animated hit Kung Fu Panda 4, which became the second biggest installment in its franchise history with over $180 million domestically and more than $0.5 billion worldwide. Biopic Bob Marley, One Love, which captivated audiences and generated nearly $100 million of domestic box office. Musical Comedy Mean Girls an action thriller the Beekeeper, which each delivered close to $70 million domestically and megadventure Godzilla xCom the new Empire that opened to a monstrous $80 million in North America at the end of the quarter and has since delivered over $500 million worldwide. The first quarter also benefited from strong continued play-through of December's whimsical family spectacle, Wonka, which has now exceeded $215 million domestically and nearly $415 million globally, as well as anyone by you that proved audiences are still craving romantic comedies and theaters having generated close to $90 million of domestic box office over its impressive run. Furthermore, we continued to witness strength of nontraditional content during…

Thank you, Sean. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the call today. We were pleased that the first quarter box office surpassed our expectations. Our team once again demonstrated our agility in the fluid environment and achieved healthy operating and financial outcomes by capitalizing on the box office and diligently executing our strategic initiatives. Globally, we welcomed 40 million guests to our theaters and generated $579.2 million of worldwide revenue in the first quarter. We delivered $70.7 million of adjusted EBITDA, yielding a solid adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.2% despite the pressure on operating leverage given the attendance decline due to the impact of the Hollywood strikes. Domestically, we entertained 23.6 million moviegoers in the first quarter and maintained strong market share. We generated $231.8 million in admissions revenue, and we grew our average ticket price 1% year-over-year to $9.82. The growth in average ticket price was driven by our strategic pricing initiatives, partially offset by ticket type mix with more family content in the first quarter of this year as well as format mix due to the lapping of strong 3D penetration on Avatar from the prior year period. We generated $178.6 million of domestic concession revenue, and our U.S. concession per cap achieved a first quarter record of $7.57. Our concession per cap grew 2% in the quarter, fueled primarily by strategic and inflationary pricing measures and a shift in product mix towards higher price concession items, partially offset by lower incidence rates due to film content. Other revenue was $46.6 million, down 2% year-over-year, primarily due to the decline in attendance. Collectively, our Domestic segment generated $457 million of total revenue and $49.1 million of adjusted EBITDA, yielding an adjusted EBITDA margin of 10.7%, reflecting the relatively fixed nature of our domestic cost base. Shifting…

[Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from the line of Eric Handler with ROTH MKM.

Sean, we've seen a number of companies this earnings season talk about the consumer being more conservative with their -- or selective with their spending decisions. I'm curious, are you seeing anything notable in terms of how they purchase tickets or food and beverage decisions that maybe suggest there's some selectiveness going on here, too.

Thanks for the question. It's a good question. I'd say interestingly, to date, very consistent with history, we have not seen a significant impact from the macro economy on our business. consumers when the movies are in our theaters, we continue to see consumers coming out. I mean, I think we mentioned that in the prepared remarks, just in terms of the number of films that have delivered above expectations. And that plays through to choices to upgrade to premium format to plays through to concession purchases. As we mentioned, we had another record first quarter per cap this quarter. So we haven't seen that bleed through. It's similar to, as I mentioned, recessionary environments of the past where our industry has grown in 6 of the past 8 major recessions in North America. Going to the movies remains an affordable form of entertainment while consumers may scale back and other things that they may otherwise go to. It's a localized, affordable means of entertaining themselves, and they still tend to select to indulge when they come to theartres. And we just -- we continue to see that in this current environment.

Great. And then just as a follow-up. From what I see in your press release, there really isn't much of a backlog at this point with newbuild theaters. Are you seeing anything change in the market that maybe could allow you to expand beyond what you're currently planning?

Sure. Well, I think there's probably twofold. One, I think much like the whole of the industry, during the course of the pandemic, our development process was more or less put on hold. We have reactivated that development pipeline process. So we're out there kind of scouting look to get sites. So there's a bit of a delay on account of that. And then beyond that, as we've talked about, we're still in that mode of just refortifying our balance sheet and being tempered in the amount of CapEx we're deploying as our cash flow continues to recover. So I think those 2 things are a bit of regulators over just the speed of new build activity. But there are still plenty of markets where we see opportunities. And I think some of that will start to ramp to a certain degree over the coming years. It's just going to take a little bit of time.

Next question comes from the line of David Karnovsky with JPMorgan.

Sean, I wanted to see if you could expand a bit more on your conversations in CinemaCon. What are you hearing from legacy studios in terms of output? Is there anything incremental to share regarding some of the streamers. And then with Amazon, we've seen them achieve some success recently with exclusive streaming films. Does that create any concern from your end about their output ramping over time? And for, Melissa, just your staffing costs were nearly flat year-over-year. I wanted to see if you could just speak a bit more to the initiatives you're deploying to control expenses there? And how should we think about the rest of the year kind of just given natural labor inflation and likely improvement in film supply by Q4?

All right. Well, thanks for the questions. Starting with CinemaCon, I'd say the overall the overall feeling coming out of CinemaCon was definitely a very positive one. I think -- so it's interesting to get some exposure to the materials that are up and coming. And by and large, I think everyone is really positive about what they saw. Things look extremely promising. As I mentioned too, just the number of titles that were showcased were also to a greater degree. How that all plays through to future volume, both what we heard during CinemaCon and also what we continue to hear as we speak directly with our studio partners is one of a focus on continuing to replenish their production. They're building their slates back in many respects towards where they were prepandemic. In certain cases, are looking to go beyond that. But it's just going to take some time. Obviously, they were in the process of ramping that back post pandemic, and then the strengths just put a little hiccup in that. So that's just prolonged things a bit further. But on the whole, we remain very optimistic that in the coming years, we could see volume return back to or close to, if not exceed pre-pandemic levels. Specific to your question on Amazon, yes, I mean, look, we have very direct conversations. I think they're really bullish about theatrical opportunities. They are continuing to build towards that. They've got a number of films already slated this year. I think they're looking at 25 as kind of their first big major film slate in theatrical. That doesn't mean that they're going to walk away from direct to platform films. I mean we've seen that forever in this industry where studios will make -- the HBO would make direct for HBO movies in the past, and there'd be direct to video film. So we certainly expect there will continue to be direct to streaming films -- it's those movies that have a certain degree of higher scale and potential that are the ones that we will see coming to theaters. And we know that Amazon, at least what they're sharing with us remains very committed to continuing to build into the space.

And then, David, on the labor front. So we do continue to scale our labor hours up and down based on projected attendance levels that we're seeing. And we are working on a range of initiatives to drive further labor productivity. So a couple of examples for that would be continuing to rightsize our staffing at the wing, so opening and closing, being even more nimble between slow and peak periods with a focus on our most profitable service hours, optimizing operating hours and scheduling for expanded food and beverage offerings. And those are just some of the ways that we're looking to drive efficiencies. With respect to salaries and wages more broadly, it is reasonable to assume going forward that we'll continue to flex our labor hours based on anticipated attendance levels, albeit at a rate that is less than the change in attendance. I will say, on the wage rate side, we do continue to face some pressure there. Now fortunately, what we're seeing now is more in line with prepandemic increases. And then as I mentioned, we do expect to continue to see some productivity benefits as we lean in there. The one call I would make though in 2024 in particular, especially in the first half of the year, we do expect to be more impacted by minimum staffing levels, just given the reduction in content volume is more concentrated in that period this year. But overarchingly, we're leaning into data, assessing our profitability on a per theater per hour basis to determine operating hours and our corresponding staffing requirements. And we'll continue to balance our revenue-generating opportunities with cost mitigating initiatives.

Next question comes from the line of Ben Swinburne with Morgan Stanley.

Two questions really around some debates, I think, on your business and the stock. Your market share gains have persisted now for a while coming out of the pandemic, as you know. And I guess, one question I'd be curious to hear about is just the role that your loyalty programs you think play in driving share. I mean I thought the slide in the deck that you have is interesting. You've got a million-plus people in Movie Club, but $20 million plus in a rewards program. I guess the question is, do these have a measurable tangible benefit to your share and returns that you could share with us? And then secondly is around kind of capital allocation. I know it's leverage ticked up as expected. I'm just wondering, Sean, if you could talk about how you guys look at M&A. How do you think about valuing assets out there relative to your own stock? How do you think about deploying capital and M&A relative to resuming the dividend. I think it would be helpful to hear your approach to those trade-offs as you guys move through this year.

Excellent. Well, thanks for the questions, Ben. To start with market share, we certainly believe that our loyalty programs play a part in supporting our market share. It's difficult to fully slice that up in terms of how much of that is attributable just to the loyalty programs versus to some of our Showtime planning efforts as well as just the marketing actions we do in general to try to stimulate demand and coming to Cinemark. Like there's a whole series of things. And just the overall service and experience that we try to provide in terms of our elevated levels of maintenance and just the overall experience we create. So it's tough to say that. But given that Movie Club now consistently represents about 25% of our box office and those moviegoers tend to be our most satisfied moviegoers. I mean they wind up having a strong affinity to coming to our theaters. So it certainly is a component, we believe, of what we're seeing in the uptick in our share and we continue to look at ways that we can continue to pack value in that and utilize the data in that communication channel we have to create value for those guests because we see them over-indexing in their degree of frequency in their level of coming to Cinemark. And again, their overall satisfaction with regard to the experience they're having. Specific to M&A, look, M&A is certainly one of the prongs of potential growth we think about as we consider optimizing our footprint and growing overall. We do continue to target high-quality assets that we believe can deliver solid assured returns over time. So we evaluate everything through that lens. We're not just looking to grow for growth's sake. We believe we've had a lot of success…

And in terms of our near-term capital allocation priorities, as I mentioned, as we stated on the call that those do remain centered around strengthening balance sheet and making those right investments to position us well for the long term. Ultimately, our decisions, as Sean mentioned, are return driven by returns. In terms of the dividend though, we do believe our approach is prudent right now, maintaining conservatism around our cash, given the box office headwinds this year, coupled with the back-end weighting of the box office, which we do believe may pressure our net leverage ratio in the near term. All that said, though, dividends, a significant aspect of our capital allocation strategy prior to the pandemic and will remain a key consideration for us going forward.

Next question comes from the line of Robert Fishman with MoffettNathanson.

One for Sean and then one for Melissa. Sean, maybe taking a different angle on the CinemaCon takeaways. I'm wondering how you'd characterize Cinemark's relationship with your studio partners more as it relates to the recent or maybe even upcoming renewals around windowing strategies? And do you see an opportunity to improve film rental split going forward? Maybe let's start there, and I'll come back with my other one.

Sure. Well, Alex, I'd say overarchingly our relationships are very positive with our studio partners. Specific to windows that there's clearly been quite a bit of evolution in the window throughout the pandemic and following up on the pandemic. I think with a lot of experimentation, there was clearly quite a bit of learning that an exclusive window definitely is something that creates more value for these film assets, particularly for the studios. It's the best way to fully gain that revenue opportunity in the theatrical space. It helps to create that bigger cultural moment. It helps to create more lift in downstream impact on all those subsequent channels. So that has clearly been tested and learned again and it is something we're seeing now and by and large, in the practice of Windows. I would say one of the changes, which we actually view as a net positive while the window reduced a bit coming out of the pandemic and has become more dynamic, what that has led to, in our view, is something that improves the risk equation for the studios. So in success, the movie can run long and they can extract more value out of the window, whereas if a movie they go for it and the movie just doesn't work, they've got an opportunity to get into the home quicker and manage their downside, which net-net is a good thing, especially as we're looking for more volume to come back through. So it's one of the things we look to as a positive that plays into that resurgence of volume. And the reality is when movies aren't working, generally, we're moving on to the other films that are working stronger to begin with. So it works collectively both ways. And we think that we can lead to the CEOs taking more risks on films like the mid-tier films and the romantic comedies and the Rosheen. Some of the stuff that we haven't seen as much as of late because that was a tougher financial decision prior to the pandemic. So we're very positive. And I would say, over the course of discussions, there has been economic consideration that has been factored into the equation with regard to some of the evolution of windows. So I think more on the go forward, it's just back to kind of that typical back and forth from any supplier customer relationship in terms of the splits. I wouldn't say there is any heightened degree of pressure or ease relative to the norm. It's that traditional relationship where sometimes one party is a little bit stronger and other past others and things just kind of flow in the aggregate, the overall film rental rates tend to stay relatively stable.

Great. Melissa, if I can do a little bit more detailed follow-up on CapEx. Spending levels have hovered around $100 million, $150 million range you mentioned guidance again for this year coming out of the pandemic. But back in '19, you were at an elevated $300 million level. And I understand that included the core maintenance spend in that $80 million range. But there was more significant spending levels around the new builds that you already touched on and these cash flow generating projects. So just maybe a long way of asking, should we expect to see more investment in cash flow-generating projects or anything else in the pipeline to call out to get back to more of an elevated level in '25 and beyond, even if it remains below '19 levels.

So thanks for the question, Robert. So we do believe our history of proactively maintaining and investing in our theaters is a key differentiator for the company. As you think about CapEx beyond 2024, I would expect us to maintain, again, a balanced and disciplined approach to our capital expenditures, but to ramp our CapEx levels up as the box office rebounds. While our peak CapEx years are behind us, from where I sit today, what I would say is we expect to grow to around -- CapEx to grow to around $200 million to $250 million annualized on a normalized basis. So that will be contingent upon, obviously, the ROI-generating opportunities that are available to us, but that $200 million to $250 million annually is where we think CapEx should shake out relative to that kind of 300-plus range that you saw at our peak years in the pandemic. And remember that included kind of that heavy push for recliner penetration that's behind us largely at this stage. We would still expect around $80 million to $100 million of that spend to be earmarked towards maintenance CapEx to maintain a high-quality circuit. The remainder dedicated towards new builds and other theater enhancements, including laser projector conversions.

Next question comes from the line of Omar Mejias with Wells Fargo.

Sean, maybe on the market share performance, it was very impressive during the quarter, especially as display was in particularly favorable for your demographics. To the extent you can -- can you parse out the impact on due 2 and DLF performance versus continued organic share gains? And maybe second for me, you recently extended your Summer Movie Club House program in response to strong consumer demand. Can you talk about the benefits of programs like this and any other opportunities that you have to maximize capacity utilization across your circuit during off-peak periods.

Sure. Thanks for the questions, Omar. Specific to share, obviously, we're very pleased with our results in the first quarter. And actually, there were -- we benefited in particular from a handful of outperforming titles. So films like Kungfu Panda for, God Zilix,Cong, and New Empire and Bob Marley One Love, those films kewed very much in our favor during the course of the quarter, and I think were some of the drivers of our share. They more than offset, I would say, some of the headwinds. DOOM 2 was, by the way, was our biggest film of the quarter. But given it's a heavy sci-fi film, which often doesn't skew as much in our circuit, our share was a bit lower on that specific title. But collectively, all these other films definitely helped to drive that. I'd say another benefit in that it was an overall reduced box office environment due to the strikes. We also weren't coming up against capacity issues. Sometimes in those higher box office periods, you can only sell as many seats as you have. So that can also sometimes lead to a dampening of share a bit. We didn't have any of those issues over the course of the quarter, which allowed us to just to really fully maximize the upside potential on all of these titles. Programs, it's interesting, you mentioned the summer movie Clubhouse, and we think it's a great program. Really, the goal of that program is to try to get younger families and younger audiences into the habit of moviegoing by giving them a very accessible price point on some legacy films. It really is a program that runs for a number of weeks. It's 1 day a week in the morning. So it's an early morning type of opportunity. So it can help with to a certain degree, filling out that kind of maybe slower period on an early Wednesday morning. But I'd say that program, in particular, is really more designed towards trying to stimulate moviegoers of the future versus fill in other periods of lower capacity. We do run a number of other types of programs of bringing back reporatory content, fan favorites and things of that sort that we look to kind of sprinkle in to lower periods of volume and certain days of the week as a way to try to get a lift in -- during the course of the week days, in particular, in slower periods of business. So there are efforts like that, that we do pursue to try to do that.

Next question comes from the line of Chad Beynon with Macquarie.

This is Aaron on for Chad. One more for you around CinemaCon. Was there anything you saw from a tech standpoint that you believe could enhance or change the experience for your moviegoers or help you from a productivity standpoint?

Think about that. There's all kinds of evolutions that are constantly happening in terms of new introductions of technology, both from a productivity standpoint as well as from a presentation standpoint. Obviously, Barco recently announced their new HDR kind of light steering projection capability. It's something that we've been talking to them about and working with them on for actually a number of years. So that's kind of out there. And that's something that has the potential. It's a new even heightened level of laser projection. I mean laser projection in and of itself takes the quality of light on screen to a new level. It actually has productivity elements baked into it as well because it doesn't consume as much energy. You don't have to change the bulbs as much. You don't have to maintain them as frequently. So those types of pieces of equipment lend themselves to productivity and then the light steering component of that also is something that could be taking that to another level. So there are things like that, that work. But yes, there's a range of things. I mean, even in food and beverage new types of equipment, things like that, that could lead to productivity. I mean, not necessarily specific to CinemaCon, but obviously, you see it in different places in the market with unattended retail and things of that sort, which could lead to some overall labor productivity depending on -- as well as just revenue growth in pockets of theaters where you may be able to insert some of those things and drive incremental sales. So yes, I would say that's something that our teams are constantly evaluating and it goes well beyond Cinemark, just looking at what's coming to market in various pockets of our business from presentation, from labor management, from food and beverage equipment and things of that sort, just to drive incremental productivity benefits and overall experiential opportunities.

That's great. And then just regarding concession per cap. So you just hit a domestic record in the U.S. for the first quarter. Are you seeing more engagement in terms of incidence of purchase bigger basket size or price increases? How would you break that down?

I'll take that one, Aaron. So on the domestic per cap side, our per cap was up 2% year-over-year, and that was driven by strategic pricing actions to offset some of the inflationary cost pressures that we've been seeing as well as a shift in product mix towards higher-priced items, merchandise being one example of that. That was partially offset by lower incidence rates due to the content mix in the quarter. And so that's really the breakdown of the drivers there. As you think though about our per cap on a go-forward basis, we do continue to believe that we can moderately grow our concession per cap for full year 2024 domestically. We continue to lean into various initiatives to maximize our incidence rates. So mobile order, ordering adoption self-service capabilities, modifying the flow of concession traffic as well as leaning into enhanced food offerings, merchandise sales and scaling third-party delivery. We also continue to look to find optimal pricing that will maximize our per caps while maintaining high incidence rates. But as you saw in the first quarter, our per cap will fluctuate ultimately quarter-to-quarter with film mix.

That's great. Congrats on the quarter.

Next question comes from the line of Mike Hickey with Benchmark.

Great job on the quarter. Just 2 questions from us. Obviously, you don't forecast the box office, Sean, for obvious reasons. But given what you know, I guess, about Q2 and the rest of the year and maybe just in terms of wide releases, do you feel like, obviously, Q1 outperformed, do you feel like you can sort of build on the strength of Q1 sequentially through the remainder of the year? Or any sort of, I guess, insight on phasing on the box office. It seems like Q2 would be higher than Q1, Q3 higher than Q2, Q4 higher than Q3. But curious what you think there. And then any update, I guess, on wide release product in '25, how that would compare to '24 and pre-pandemic. And then Melissa, I'm not sure if you touched on this or not, but your concession margin domestically was sort of sub 81%. I think it's had about 3 quarters of sequential pressure here. Just curious what's driving that? And if you think this is sort of a low point in the quarter, and you can sort of build back margins through the remainder of the year and medium term?

Sure. Thanks for the questions, Mike. Specific, I guess, starting with this year, yes, we saw a little bit of lift in the first quarter. There's been some title shifts like we know, just like Karate Kid just moved out a year. So when we look at the totality of 2024, we still, at least from our view advantage point, we still think it probably looks pretty consistent to what we were seeing at the onset of the year. Overall, volume of wide releases, we're still counting at around 95 or so films, which is down a touch from last year's $110 million, again, relative to about $130 million from pre-pandemic time frames. And that's all a byproduct of the 6-plus months of Hollywood strikes last year. So as you mentioned, the year is definitely back-end loaded. More of that impact is playing through in the first part of the year. And then as you get towards the fourth quarter, that's when things really start to ramp up, particularly the scale of the releases because those larger films that have more complex productions, more complex visual effects, like those are the things in particular that were most impacted. So I'd say at this stage, at least, again, from our vantage point, things we're seeing we still think the year is kind of looking comparable to what we were anticipating 3 months ago. As we look out to '25, it's still a bit early per normal practice to try to get a full handle on that. We're optimistic that we're going to see overall volume. I mean, our viewpoint was you saw a nice progression from '21 to '22, '22 to '23. Prior to the strikes, we were anticipating '24 would continue that trajectory and then we had this little hiccup from the strikes. And we think '25 will likely spring back to that trajectory curve that we've been on of recovery. So it will be somewhere likely in line or above 2023, between 2023 and prepandemic levels. Prior to the strikes, we thought there could be the potential for '25 or '26 to get back to prepandemic levels, with the strikes, we think that pushes out a little bit further. But again, we think that we'll see some nice lift in improvement next year once we're fully past the effects of the strikes of last year. And I'd just say, I know there's been a lot of questions on on CinemaCon, at least the materials that were shared during that convention for the films that are going to be releasing in '25 look incredibly promising. I mean we're really optimistic about what we saw and really pleased just with the quality of the presentation of those titles that are up and coming.

Mike, in terms of your question on domestic concession cost rate, the change that you saw year-over-year in Q1 was primarily driven by 2 key factors: one, a shift in product mix towards lower margin rate items such as merchandise as well as candy. And then in addition to that, we did see some increases in the cost of some of our core concession items. So fountain beverages, bottled drinks and T&D. And then partially offsetting that was benefits that we realized from the strategic pricing actions that we've been implementing. As you look forward, we do expect concession costs as a percentage of concession revenue to begin to moderate over the next few quarters. Now that said, we do still anticipate that our COGS rate will reflect a modest step up for -- or from full year 2023 levels due in part to product mix as we continue to look to grow merchandise sales, expand enhanced food offerings as well as scale third-party concession delivery, which have lower margins than our overall kind of core concession offerings. Now while we do expect ongoing inflationary pressure to continue in 2024, particularly in transportation, packaging and certain commodities, namely cocoa. We expect these pressures to be somewhat offset by corn, canola oil and buttery topping prices moderating. So we also continue to execute on strategies to offset inflationary impacts wherever possible, including through strategic sourcing efforts, our pricing strategies and proactive category management to really drive incidents.

Next question comes from the line of Jim Goss with Barrington.

You discussed earlier at your caution about new builds. But I was also sort of interested in looking at the screen count reduction you've had over the past 5 years, I think, since pandemic. I imagine the screen count reduction has had less of a revenue impact because of the nature of the screens you have been cutting out and also less of a profit impact. But can you talk about the headwind or drag that might have posed on you over those years and what it's doing right now? And are you mostly through the process of screen count rationalization? Or should we expect somewhat more.

Thanks, Jim. Good question. I'd say on the whole, the industry has probably seen slightly in excess of 10% screen rationalization since the pandemic. On a total net basis of those that we've closed relative to those that we've opened, we're slightly below that. Certainly, in the U.S., we're about 7% or so of our screens down versus prepenandemic. But the majority of those screens that have closed for us are ones that were lower-performing screens. There are ones that were older theaters, more on the cost of just breakeven performance. So from an overall impact on financials, net-net between what we've closed and what we've opened, that's actually a net positive in terms of bottom line. So I'd say we've been very, very particular in that. So there's been many theaters we've been able to go back and make modifications to leases and things like that and improve and in certain cases, it just made sense to rationalize a bit. So on the whole, that's just part of our overall optimization of our footprint as we're looking to really shore up our higher-performing theaters, look to make modifications to those theaters where we have the opportunity to do so with certain leases where there's a bit of pressure and then exit ones that are a bit more strained in that whole calculus. And then again, we're adding new theaters to those footprints where there's opportunity. As we look ahead, yes, I mean I'd say we're kind of in that normal phase now where it was always part of our practice of as older theaters are coming to the end of their leases. We're looking at how they're performing, and does it make sense to continue with those or does it make sense to look to newer opportunities. So there could certainly be some incremental closures that we see over the coming years, but I wouldn't say that's necessarily a byproduct of the pandemic at this point. That's just more of our normal practice. And as I mentioned earlier, we have reinvigorated our development pipeline with regard to new builds and new -- looking at new assets to bring into the fold. So that could also offset that.

Okay. And one other one. In recent calls, you've talked about alternative content, and it seems like it's a lot of the trains are talking about this a little bit more. I'm wondering what type of content are you thinking might resonate best with your audiences? Would it be concerts or sports, if you can get the right or other smaller genres like the faith base that you brought up. Are there other things? And also IMAX, and this call was talking about using other days, which seems to be the conventional wisdom as to when you might both net-net ahead with alternative content. Can you talk about any plans along those lines?

Sure. Look, definitely, overall, we've been thrilled to see a burst of life with alternative content. Historically, it just kind of hovered around 1% to 2% of box office. And we always felt there was a lot more potential in these types of titles, and we're finally seeing that. For our circuit, I wouldn't say there's any one particular category that is necessarily the driver. It's really across the board. So you named a few of them, whether it be concerts, faith-based films, multicultural titles, anime, we're seeing great success across all of these different categories. And we're thrilled just to see more and more titles of significance coming into theaters in that area. Again, for the first quarter, nontraditional content represented about 14% of our box office. So it's definitely inflated again, similar to last year, which was a banner year for nontraditional films. So we're certainly leaning into that. I'd say the key is there's often work to be done in this space. So finding those types of products that lend themselves to scale. Sports, as you mentioned, is an area of opportunity. It's a complicated one just due to the way the licenses work. And then also the question becomes how can you get scale because those tend to be singular events on a singular show time versus something like a concert or something like a faith-based film that can run throughout the week or weeks, really. So there are some questions there. So it's all about finding those properties with scale. Looking for things that could be more unique opportunities to also fill in slower periods during the week, there is also the potential for that. I mean we were talking about that earlier with some of the other kinds of event types of products that we bring into our theaters. So we'll have to see. But I do think what's been wonderful to see is, yes, the potential of these types of titles has -- is being realized. What's also nice is that these types of films can also bring new types of audiences into theaters who then get exposed to the films, get exposed to the recliner seats, folks who may not have been industriquently and then they start a moviegoing practice. So it can kind of expand beyond this type of content. So again, we remain really optimistic about continued growth in this space, and it really cuts across a range of categories.

Next question comes from the line of Stephen Laszczyk with Goldman Sachs.

Sean, you mentioned earlier the resilience you're seeing on the consumer front. Maybe just given that, could you update us on your latest thoughts on taking ticket price, especially from some of the more in-demand stretches and the law coming up here over the next few quarters? And then one for Melissa. Just on facility lease expense. Sean, I think you mentioned it in your prior response, but there might be some opportunity to negotiate on rent. I'm curious how much opportunity you think there is to move the needle there over the next few years?

Okay. Thanks for the question, Stephen. Look, I mean, the question on pricing is an important one. I mean, obviously, we were talking about the environment that we're in right now. So it's an area that we need to be careful about, and we are very careful about we use a lot of data to drive our decision-making on what's the right price point. So while consumer resilience has certainly been there, demand has been strong, we got to be careful that we don't go too far and push things that could change that dynamic, right, especially in a high inflationary type of environment where people may be starting to be a bit more discretion in what they select. We've seen that over the years. And again, we use a lot of data. We have a team that focuses heavily on this to make sure that we're trying to capture as much opportunity as we can, which basically cuts both ways. It's not unilaterally up. It can go both ways to really maximize attendance, maximize box office, maximize incidents with regard to food and beverage sales and overall food and beverage revenues. So again, it's something that we believe there's lots of ongoing opportunity with further analytics. It constantly is evolving, but it's a dynamic that we'll just continue to stay on top of and it isn't utilized early one way.

And then with respect to facility lease expense, so it's important to note that leases or contractual obligation. So unless there's an event such as the end of a lease term or a landlord needs our consent for their redevelopment, there isn't much of a catalyst to renegotiate a lease particularly given the strength of our financial position. That said, we're actively working to renegotiate leases as their expiration in our renewal dates approach. And we have seen some success in that regard, particularly as it relates to more challenged theaters. But keep in mind that only about, call it, 10% to 15% of our leases are up for renewal in any given year. So it's a fairly small percentage.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the floor over to Sean Gamble for closing comments.

Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining this morning. I'd just like to emphasize again that we remain highly encouraged as we look ahead based on the current dynamics related to consumer moviegoing behavior, the different forward-looking indicators we see pertaining to film releases as we discussed and also just the wealth of opportunities that we see before us to drive incremental value creation. We do think that Cinemark is particularly well positioned to prosper on account of our advantage position and our exceptional team, and we look forward to speaking with you again following our second quarter results. So thanks again for the time this morning.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.