Good afternoon, and welcome to Compass Diversified's First Quarter 2022 Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Cody Slach of Gateway Group for introductions and the reading of the safe harbor statement. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and welcome to Compass Diversified's First Quarter 2020 Conference Call. Representing the company today are Elias Sabo, CODI's CEO; Ryan Faulkingham, CODI's CFO; and Pat Maciariello, COO of Compass Group Management. Before we begin, I would like to point out that the Q1 2022 press release, including the financial tables and non-GAAP financial measure reconciliations are available at the Investor Relations section on the company's website at compassdiversified.com. The company also filed its Form 10-Q with the SEC today after the market closed, which includes reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call, including adjusted EBITDA and cash available for distribution and is also available at the Investor Relations section of the company's website. Please note that references to EBITDA in the following discussions refer to adjusted EBITDA as reconciled to net income or loss from continuing operations in the company's financial filings. The company does not provide a reconciliation of its full year expected 2022 adjusted earnings or adjusted EBITDA because certain significant reconciling information is not available without unreasonable efforts. Throughout this call, we will refer to Compass Diversified as CODI or the company. Now allow me to read the following safe harbor statement. During this conference call, we may make certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard to the future performance of CODI and its subsidiaries and statements related to the impact of CODI's updated tax structure and the impact and expected timing of acquisitions and dispositions. Words such as believes, expects, plans, projects and future or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Certain factors could cause actual results to differ on a material basis from those projected in these forward-looking statements, and some of these factors are enumerated in the risk factor discussion in the Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, as well as in other SEC filings. In particular, the domestic and global economic environment as currently impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and related supply chain and labor disruptions has a significant impact on our subsidiary companies. Except as required by law, CODI undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Elias Sabo.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us today on our first quarter 2022 conference call. I'm pleased to report that we carried last year's momentum into the first quarter of the year, where we recorded our fifth consecutive quarter of record results that is enabling us to raise our 2022 outlook. We're extremely pleased with these results, and I want to acknowledge and thank our management teams and employees. They continue to put forth an extraordinary effort that we believe will generate sustainable long-term value for our shareholders. In our last earnings call, we discussed our strong execution against a tough macro environment, and this quarter was certainly no different. Supply chain constraints, inflationary pressures, and the lack of labor were all rising headwinds our companies had to navigate in the quarter. Our ability to execute on our strategy, despite these constraints is a testament to the strength of our management teams and the quality of the company's NEOM. During the quarter, we delivered double-digit sales growth in both our branded consumer and niche industrial businesses. Importantly, our fastest-growing business, BOA Technologies continued to perform above expectations as revenue and adjusted EBITDA growth continued to accelerate. In fact, BOA's $25 million of adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter represents the highest EBITDA producing quarter CODI's business has ever reported. As we have said on prior calls, BOA's unique combination of disruptive technology, strong intellectual property, relatively low penetration in a very large addressable market, when combined with an extraordinary management team, has left a performance that is significantly stronger than expected when we acquired the business 1.5 years ago. One component of the growth story to keep in mind for the first quarter, however, is the elongation of the supply chain. So it's conceivable some of this quarter's demand reflects pull forward from future quarters, but with only 5% penetration in the addressable market, we remain quite optimistic that BOA's long-term growth story remains intact. Lugano continues to perform significantly ahead of our expectations. And as mentioned on our Q4 call, we had seen a historical relationship between inventory investment and highly profitable revenue growth pay dividends. We were excited our investment translated into almost 50% pro forma adjusted EBITDA growth, and we will plan on putting more capital in this business as this correlation is expected to continue. Overall, we did an extraordinary job posting year-over-year growth while preserving margins. In the first quarter, we had only 100 basis points of margin degradation despite unprecedented supply chain and inflationary conditions. Though we anticipate the economic headwinds that impacted our margins could persist in the short term, we believe that the quality of all our subsidiaries competitive positioning allows us in a more stable inflationary environment to be able to fully recoup all of that margin. With that, I will now turn the call over to Pat.

Thanks, Elias. On a combined basis, revenue and EBITDA in both our branded consumer and our niche industrial businesses grew meaningfully and exceeded our expectations. As Elias mentioned, our businesses performed admirably throughout the continued supply chain and inflation headwinds, though these headwinds led margins and EBITDA performance to lag revenue growth slightly. While we are working through appropriate cost and pricing actions at each business to address the modest margin compression, these actions often take time to implement and may not be reflected in our financial performance in the short term. Our management team partners at each of our businesses continue to execute for their customers and employees, and I remain very proud to work with each of them. Now to our subsidiary results. I'll begin with our niche industrial businesses. For the first quarter of 2022, revenues increased by 19.5% and adjusted EBITDA by 9.4% versus the first quarter of 2021. Arnold and Outdoor both posted meaningful revenue and adjusted EBITDA growth in the quarter, driven by solid execution and stronger-than-expected demand. Outdoor's margins declined somewhat due to higher raw material costs, but we expect that most of these costs will be passed through contractually later this year. At Sterno, demand for our catering products grew significantly throughout the quarter and into Q2 as leisure travel and conventions continue to return domestically. Sterno's scented wax products, however, saw a reduction in demand from an abnormally strong first quarter in 2021, which was likely partially driven by federal stimulus payments in that period. Turning to our consumer businesses. For the first quarter of 2022, revenues increased by 14% and adjusted EBITDA increased by 13% compared to Q1 2021. Demand for BOA's Performance Fit System continue to exceed our expectations. The company's revenue increased by over 55% in the quarter,…

Thank you, Pat. Before I get into our financial performance, I wanted to make a few comments regarding Advanced Circuits. Last quarter, we indicated that the closing of the ACI sale remained on track and was expected to occur early in the second quarter. For the terms of the merger agreement, the merger of ACI and Tempo is subject to and conditioned upon a concurrent business combination between Tempo and ACE Convergence Acquisition Corp., which is a stack. Earlier this week, ACE announced that the previously scheduled shareholder meeting to approve the Tempo, ACE business combination has been postponed to allow ACE additional time to revise and finalize its financing arrangements. As a result of the announcement, we will not be taking any further questions related to the ACI transaction. Moving to our consolidated financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, I'll limit my comments largely to the overall results for CODI since the individual subsidiary results are detailed in our Form 10-Q that was filed with the SEC earlier today. On a consolidated basis, revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 was $510.5 million, up 25% compared to $408.6 million for the prior year period. This year-over-year increase primarily reflects the company's acquisition of Lugano in September of 2021 as well as a strong double-digit growth from BOA, Marucci Sports and Outdoor Solutions. Consolidated net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, was $29.7 million, a 35% increase compared to $22 million in the prior year ago quarter. As introduced last quarter, adjusted earnings, a non-GAAP financial metric, will allow investors to assess our operating performance in a more meaningful and transparent way. Adjusted earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, was $36 million, up $9.9 million or 38% from the year ago quarter.…

Thank you, Ryan. I would like to close by briefly providing an update on the M&A market, CODI's corporate initiatives and discussing our go-forward growth strategy. Beginning with the overall M&A market. Activity remains depressed as potential sellers are choosing to delay processes given the economic headwinds and the macro backdrop. We anticipate activity to remain depressed in the second quarter as these headwinds persist, followed by a gradual uptick in activity in the back half of the year if these headwinds start to moderate. As a brief update on one of our primary corporate initiatives, we are aggressively enhancing and institutionalizing our ESG practices. As we have stated in the past, we believe sound and well implemented ESG practices not only can be beneficial to society and our environment, but also contribute to the management of risk and enhance long-term returns. In this regard, I am excited to share our progress to date. By way of background, our ESG strategies will focus on initiatives such as diversity, equity and inclusion of people and thought, health and well-being of our customers and employees, attracting and retaining the best talent, environmental considerations, transparency and continuing to be a trusted partner with investors, businesses and communities. Fundamentally, CODI's ESG strategy is a primary business decision that will be anchored throughout the corporate ethos in order to directly enhance CODI's purpose of building sound and sustainable businesses, culminating in strong shareholder returns. Along these lines, we have begun to directly link and implement our ESG practices into our portfolio companies vertically integrating and aligning these strategies throughout the organization. These ESG parameters will become an important factor in managing risk, reducing the cost of capital and expanding multiples at all of our companies. Additionally, diversity continues to stay front of mind during our hiring process, and we have recently added 3 talented diverse hires to our team. We believe diversity of people and thought introduces new perspectives, skills and approaches to problem solving that enhances the company's strategic and operating capabilities. We are pleased with our progress to date and feel confident that we can continue to expand on these efforts. In conclusion, it was a great quarter for CODI. Relative to our expectations, our performance was outstanding. In this backdrop, the fact that gross domestic product contracted 1.4%, and we grew revenue and adjusted EBITDA by double digits is an incredible effort. And I'd like to give thanks and recognition to all of our management teams and employees. With that, operator, please open up the lines for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] We have the first question comes from the line of Matt Koranda of ROTH Capital.

So just maybe starting out with one thematic and then I'll follow up with maybe 1 or 2 on the segments. But just in terms of the consumer businesses, you guys have a lot of diversity in your consumer segment, if you will. So any takeaways that you guys have on consumer behavior sort of through the arc of the first quarter and maybe through the last month here. Just any changes that you've noticed in terms of behavior on the higher to low end as consumers kind of respond to the inflationary environment, the public market volatility or the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

Yes, Matt, it's kind of we obviously are monitoring trends throughout our entire portfolio. And even in our industrial business where some of the end products may make its way into kind of the consumer markets. I would say, in general, we were surprised by the strength of consumer spending pretty much across the board in the first quarter really with the exception, as Pat mentioned, of Sterno where our scented wax products benefited greatly from some of the pandemic conditions, people staying at home, and I think that drove a significant increase in demand for that product. and that saw some weakness. Now I would also say one conclusion we could draw is that also goes through the mass channel principally. And I think if you thought about kind of consumer stratification, it feels that the kind of more affluent customer right now is continuing to spend if I was venturing a guest, wage gains are offsetting for that consumer their basket of goods and how they measure inflation. And yet, on the lower end of the spectrum with sort of a more mass products and lower price points, my sense is inflation is eating away at purchasing power. And if somebody is making a decision to buy eggs or milk or buy kind of a consumer discretionary product, clearly, staples become the thing that they purchase. So I think we are starting to see initial signs of erosion for sort of more of the mass consumer and the lower price point items as inflation is quite problematic and eroding purchasing power there. But as you know, most of our consumer businesses or more enthusiast type brands and they tend to skew towards the higher-end consumer, the more affluent consumer. And we just have not seen a real weakening of demand there. And in fact, as we run forward through April, I would say we continue to see really good strong demand across most of the consumer portfolio. So we have not seen weakening yet. I think some of the market volatility that we're starting to see right now could eventually play into that. But it has not manifested yet into any of the real-time data that we're seeing.

Okay. Super helpful. And then maybe just on a segment one. I mean BOA putting a pretty stunning growth and the margins to do. Just I was curious if you guys might be able to -- I mean, you can't really quantify pull forward there, but I'm wondering how much in your -- is your sense that, that has pulled forward some revenue from like the footwear OEMs that may be a little bit nervous about supply chain disruption versus sort of just core growth and share take for that business?

Matt, this is Pat and thanks, it's a good question and one we spend a lot of time to get. I can tell you, demand is broad at BOA. It's in many channels, and we think it's strong and we can see into the second quarter, and we think it's sustainable. I can tell you, there might be some pull-forward if you think about the -- what is there on the [Indiscernible], another month, another 45 days, right, that there wasn't sort of 1.5 years ago. If you think of that as sort of a small headwind, but we think we're going to perform very well despite that. And we think much of the demand, most of the demand is real.

Excellent. And then maybe I'll just sneak one in on Marucci as well. I was just curious about, in that segment, where do you think you're taking the most share. You mentioned kind of using airfreight strategically to kind of fill customers and win shelf space. So, just curious like in which categories maybe that you think you're winning the most share there? And then did the costs essentially go away in the near term? Or are we going to kind of continue to use that as a tool to continue to take share?

So answering your second question first, we'll selectively use it as a tool, but they should mitigate. And as we look ahead, a lot more of kind of what we have planned in Q3, Q4 sales is not using expedited freight. Going back to your first question, we're trying to grow in a lot of categories. And some of that airfreight that we spent helped us do that this quarter be that gloves, be the bags, be that fast pick softball. We think that Marucci is a disruptive brand that really has the potential to expand into additional adjacencies within baseball, within softball and maybe beyond. And so that's the opportunity we took in Q1.

We have the next question comes from the line of Chris Kennedy of William Blair.

Can you give a little bit more details on Lugano just because we don't have the history with the business. Are we kind of at a normalized run rate or how should we think about that going forward?

So I mean, I think Q2 -- or Q1, excuse me, is seasonally a bit high. We have location in Aspen that is a heavy Q1. All that being said, the business has seen a noticeable uptick in sort of run rate. And so I would say, can you say you can multiply Q4, no -- or excuse me, Q1 by Q4 to get to our current run rate, no. But the business has seen significant, significant growth in underlying demand, and we see that continuing.

Okay. Great. And then Elias, I appreciate your comments on potential acquisitions in this space? I assume you're mostly referring to platform deals, but can you talk about add-on opportunities?

Yes, sure, Chris. I mean platform certainly have been slow in the beginning of the year given all the headwinds. And I think a couple of things are clearly occurring there. You've got early degradation from -- for the vast majority of companies, I mean we were able to buck this trend. But for most companies dealing with supply chain and the inflationary environment is causing their earnings to take a hit. And generally, sellers don't want to be in the market in those conditions. And then if you couple that with the multiple compression and just the risk off sentiment that you're seeing in the public markets, that clearly factors its way through to private markets. And for kind of the deals that we're looking at that also are competitors would be tapping into the bond market in order to provide financing. I think we all know the bond market is really struggling right now and generally not open for business. So as a result, I think investment bankers are telling their clients and sellers are seeing that now is not an opportune time. Now we do think the first half of the year, Q2 looks like it's going to be equally as weak. Hopefully, it starts to ease as the year goes on, but that's going to be predicated on market conditions. In terms of add-ons, we're working a number of add-ons. These are a little bit different and that these are generally direct negotiated transactions where we're coming up with a list of potential companies that would benefit our subsidiaries, and we continue to work through that. I would tell you that sellers of those businesses are not immune to the same factors that are happening broadly in the marketplace and what's happening in the platform side.…

The next question comes from the line of Robert Dodd of Raymond.

And congratulations on the quarter and the margin performance growth as well. But kind of following on actually to that question. I mean tough environment multiple about, et cetera, et cetera. How long do you think the environment needs to remain volatile, disrupted, et cetera, before sellers potentially become a little bit motivated. I may be willing to accept a little bit of a lower multiple when, maybe, they have capital needs, you have capital, et cetera? I mean how long would it need to go on before that would really shift in your favor?

Yes, Robert, it's -- that's a tough question to answer. I mean I think you got to -- if we look back at history, there is some amount of time where a seller needs to readjust expectations and it's difficult. I always say asset prices are sticky on the downside, right? And so when you have an expectation that the private market is delivering multiples of whatever X and now it's 80% of X or 70% of X, mentally getting comfortable with that is difficult. And I think it ultimately becomes really a case-by-case decision. There are some companies that have to transact. Think of the competitors that we're typically dealing with in traditional private equity. Well, a lot of them have fund life. If you're at the end of the fund life, you're going to have to sell your business regardless, right? and there's generational changes of assets where you have maybe a founder that wants to kind of get all of their ducks in a row as they're starting to do some estate planning. So there can be specific things that generate yield flow. As you know, though, that generally just means that you're sort of looking amongst a smaller funnel because it's just not as wide open as it's historically been. My sense is it's going to take the better part -- if markets stay volatile like this, if multiples in the public markets continue to contract as they have, it's probably going to take the better part of this year for price expectations to readjust. And then I think there is a point where you just have to kind of give in and say this is the new environment that we're working in and here is the value that we should expect to receive, and we would be happy transacting out. But I could tell you, it's not 3 months and it's likely not 6 months, there needs to be a kind of setting-in process that happens. Now we do remain kind of hopeful that the kind of back half of the year gets a little better and that '23 is meaningfully better, but some of that is going to be predicated on market conditions starting to ease a bit.

Very helpful. On BOA if I can. You said it's broad-based strength -- but not a strength there. I mean, are there any whether it's broad-based -- is it broad-based across all product types. I mean obviously, there's different levels of penetration. So I mean, it might not be growing as fast, but in geography, I mean, any areas that are doing exceptionally well.

It's across geographies. Maybe in this quarter, there was a little bit of strength in Asia, but that is the thing, right? BOA is a company whose revenue really sort of comes close to as far as the breakout matching GDP of the globe. And so it's a much more international business than certain of our other businesses. And so we have seen strong demand internationally. We've seen strong demand in Europe. We've seen strong demand in Asia. It comes down to the fact, I think that the sort of performance fit wrap in BOA's technology just has a small penetration in overall footwear right? And I made -- I personally believe it's a lot better product than the rates, particularly for performance applications. And we have a lot of data that backs that up. So there's market share to be gained in a lot of segments, and that's what you're seeing, and we believe that's what you're going to continue to see.

I appreciate that. And if I can, one more, if I can on Lugano. Obviously, you also doing very well. I presume is the inventory investment? Is that -- call it with the number of salons and growth, et cetera. But is it investing in the same level of inventory per salon? Or are you growing inventory per salon as well?

It's both. It's both, and it's -- we're making opportunistic purchases that we can then convey value on to our end consumer that we have strong relationships with throughout the country. And so it's both of those. There's a certain level of inventory you need when you build a new salon. But we also see that sort of to be more inventory we have, the more choices we have for our consumers, the greater amount of activity we're able to see.

Yes. And Robert, I would just say when we acquired Lugano and we talked to you guys about this originally, we said this is a highly disruptive business model, and they approach the industry in a fundamentally different way that disintermediates a lot of steps in the process, and they deliver a phenomenal value to their end customer as a result. And the demand in that business is really constrained by the amount of investment that we can make in it. And we had said, look, there's a real strong correlation between investing in inventory and having more product availability and revenue -- profitable revenue growth in that business. And I think we obviously monitor this on a real-time basis and very closely. But what we've seen is that correlation continues to exist as we put more investment in the business and when you run the return on invested capital of putting this in, it is so high that the -- our goal is to continue to pump capital in until that correlation would break down. In fact that it's not breaking down just means there's significant excess demand that is sitting there, and it will be driven -- greater revenue and profitable revenue growth can be driven by further investments. So what we've experienced so far has been exceptional growth. The correlation, if anything, has actually gotten stronger under our ownership, not weaker. And as a result of that, we plan on continuing to put significantly greater amounts of capital into our inventory here because we think demand is significantly greater than what we're currently satisfying and we think this is going to be not only a big year in '22, but we think we're setting this company up for multiple years of accelerated growth.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Howlett of B. Riley.

Congrats. first off, what's the update on the healthcare vertical? I know you're new in the market for the team. I just want to get the update there.

Yes, Matthew, and thanks for the question. It's -- as we've said, we continue to look for the leader. We've got a couple of candidates in mind. We're not ready to make an announcement yet, but that does progress. And we think when we get the right leader that will be something that we are able to launch. We remain confident that we will launch this effort sometime in 2022, but we continue to progress along that finding that right leader. And I'll tell you, for us, we continue to believe having someone with that domain expertise who can come in and be able to guide that effort is incredibly important for us as we go forward and making sure that we're identifying the right assets that kind of fit within our model. And so we are progressing forward with that, and I'm confident that in '22, we'll be able to fully launch that effort.

Great. Okay. Look forward to that. Update on -- just on interest rates. In CODI, you did just a tremendous job refinancing the balance sheet, keeping it straight. My question is around if the Fed does go to 300 days [Indiscernible] is there any on your -- at the portfolio company level, is there any impact that you can see. You structured it as differently in your company loans in the traditional ad market, but just go over anything if rates do, short term is go up significantly, what impact will be? Is that to your advantage? Just maybe walk me through that.

Yes. So as you identified, we hit the market and probably timed it pretty well with the bonds that we issued last year and kind of in hindsight, we were glad to get that duration into our balance sheet really at pretty much optimal timing. So we view that as a great asset that we have on our balance sheet. If you remember, those are 8- and 10-year bonds, respectively. So we've got long duration in our balance sheet. And I would point out that we have no short-term debt. And so interest rate volatility today has 0 impact on us. Now if we were to borrow into our revolver, that is a LIBOR base or whatever LIBOR, I guess, is phased out. But it's kind of an index plus the margin. And so as the index goes up, of course, that would be variable rate debt, but we have nothing drawn there. So our interest rate exposure at the parent is 0. Now we use mostly floating rate debt as we lend to our subsidiaries in our structure. And so what would happen, theoretically, and I think it's probably more a theoretical and practice is as the interest expense rises due to the fact that there is kind of a higher base rate that's being charged, right? The index has gone up, that would have the net effect of lowering taxable income at the subsidiary level. And as a result, lowering the amount of tax burden that our companies have. Now offsetting that is that interest expense from the sub comes up to the interest income at the parent, but because the parent absent a sale generates a net loss in a normal year, we think that the effect of rising interest rates will actually, in this case, because we were fortunate to lock in with long duration our interest rates last year at the parent, the effect of rising interest rates actually lowered the tax expense holistically for the company and raised the amount of free cash flow production that we would be able to generate.

And that's important given your new structure with your conversion to sequel that. And I got to assume that from a sort of strategic standpoint in the portfolio -- when you bid on these portfolio companies, certainly, your structures has to be advantageous versus what traditionally available on the leverage loan market day as rates rise.

Yes. I think -- well, I mean, as I commented earlier, the types of companies that we're typically going after, especially the larger businesses, if they're kind of $500 million type businesses, plus or minus. Those are companies that largely would be trying to tap into the bond market. maybe the smaller end of the bond market. That market has completely been eviscerated. As you know, the leveraged loan market is pretty much on pause right now as well. And so our structure -- we always say that our business shines in times like this. The higher the volatility, the more advantaged we are as a buyer, we bring certainty to a process. We have committed financing. So if you're styling a business today and you have to go out and rely on financing, the reality is there's a bigger level of risk in that financing being able to come through today than there was a year ago. And so what is the value of the certainty we bring. It's greater today than it was a year ago. I know that; putting a numerical number on that is always hard to do, and it's in the eyes of the seller, how much risk they're willing to take. But our structure is absolutely advantaged from a financing standpoint, in times of increased volatility and market uncertainty. Now I could also say we just have an advantaged structure in many other respects as well even when market volatility isn't high our permanent capital and our mentality of being long-term business builders is something that transcends through all types of market conditions. And it's a massive advantage to us, whether we sit in today's market or we sit in a market that was relatively robust from a financing standpoint a year ago, it's why we think permanent capital is really sort of what a lot of people would like to emulate that are competing for these types of assets because it is so advantageous in terms of not only being able to win companies, but being able to build businesses. But your point of having an exaggerated advantage in these times of market volatility is spot on.

Great. And just one further point on that revolver. I mean, clearly, you got that at your hip pocket, the accordion feature of well over $1 billion. I think you laid out the M&A environment pretty clearly to us. But is there a scenario where you could utilize that this year and go into it if it was just a tremendous opportunity. Just what should we expect on that to ball being drawn down this year, if at all?

Well, I think it's going to be predicated on whether or not we can transact against a meaningful sized platform acquisition as to whether we would borrow on that. In terms of cash flow, you heard Pat and Ryan in our scripted comments already talked about the fact that we've made a significant investment in inventory in order to ease supply chain. And frankly, this is something that with the strength of our balance sheet is a huge advantage for us. And you see it in the results we were able to post in Q1, which were extraordinary in this backdrop, but that is somewhat predicated on the fact that we did do $1.3 billion of financing at roughly 5% last year and long-duration financing. And we're able to use -- I think the number is over the last 6 months about $150 million to invest in inventory to take market share. And that's not only going to pay dividends in Q1 as you saw, in over the balance of 2022, but those share gains are going to be here long after supply chains normalize. And when supply chains normalize, as Ryan said, we expect to monetize a big part of that kind of inventory investment that we've made to get through these times. So if I look at our business today and I say on the one hand, we have inventory investment that we made a huge investment in over the course of the last 6 months. Likely we have enough inventory, and I'm going to exclude Lugano from that because it just went through the correlation of how Lugano's inventory investment drives really high return on invested capital growth in that business, so let's separate that for a second. The remainder of the business, frankly, has adequate inventory and if anything, is likely to be monetizing over the balance of the year and into 2023. So that's a cash flow positive. You also have our business which we had said with the change in the corporate structure is now a meaningful free cash flow preworking capital provider. And so we've got high free cash flow production that we're creating, we've got working capital that should be a cash producer, not a cash user. Now against that, we had some elevated CapEx for 5.11 in Lugano, which we think is very high return CapEx, and we have investment in further inventory growth at Lugano, which is extremely high return on invested capital. But the net of that should be positive free cash flow going forward. So the use of the revolver really is a function of how much we can deploy into either add-ons or new platform acquisitions.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Long of Adirondack.

I'm going to try on BOA again. Hopefully, you can help me out. How much of the growth was, I guess, let's call it seasonal, the obvious seasonal drivers? And then second derivatives, how much of the growth was, call it, existing product platforms, verticals, how do you want to describe it, and product extensions with existing customers and maybe how much is brand new customers, I guess. I don't know if you can parse it a little bit better.

Yes. Tim, it's Elias. And I guess, a long time, we haven't seen you. Hopefully, we'll reconnect at a conference here one of these days.

When I find management, that execute I'd be out of the way.

Good. So maybe I don't want to see you then at a future conference. To your question, I would say we look at it a little bit differently. And when we acquired BOA, we had said, what are the things we really like about it. It's a disruptive technology that is, for the most part, upending an industry that hadn't had innovation that came in, in 100 years. It is a performance enhancement. So it's not just a convenience product. And that really is kind of very important here, and we now have a lot of documentation around it. And we work with a broad range of partners. And within that, it's a global business where I think the U.S. is probably the smallest market in end market that we actually deliver product to. And then we couple that with one of the best, if not the best, management team that I've ever worked with. And I think that creates really explosive underlying organic opportunities. So it's hard to parse out with all the different things that you said. But what I would say is the market share of this business is around 5% of its addressable market. And it's got incredible IP over 160 patents that we have globally issued. And so it has really the elements that you would look for, for being able to drive sustainable long-term growth. So I would say that every year, we work with our brand partners to extend our technology on additional platforms that they have. And that is an ongoing thing that we do year in and year out. And in addition to that, our management team has done an exceptional job of being able to get into new industry verticals. And each one of those are at different levels of…

Translation: It's very early innings and the runway is really long. You don't need to start dissecting this that closely because there's just a lot on the plate, a lot of opportunity. Keep up the good work.

Yes. Tim, you just said what it took me 5 minutes to say in 10 seconds. Maybe I'll turn the call over to you.

There are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Elias, sir?

Thank you, operator. As always, I'd like to thank everyone again for joining us on today's call and for your continued interest in CODI. Thank you for your continued support.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.