Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing-by and welcome to the II-VI Incorporated Fiscal ‘21 Second Quarter Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today Mary Jane Raymond, Chief Financial Officer. Thank you. Please go ahead.

Thank you, [Raquel] and good morning. This is Mary Jane Raymond. I am the Chief Financial Officer here at II-VI Incorporated. Welcome to our earnings call today for the second quarter of fiscal year 2021. With me today on the call are Dr. Chuck Mattera, our Chief Executive Officer; and Dr. Giovanni Barbarossa, our Chief Strategy Officer; and the President of the Compound Semiconductor segment. This call is being recorded on Tuesday, February 9, 2021. Our press release and our updated investor presentation are available on the Investor Relation’s tab of the website, ii-vi.com. Just as a reminder, any forward-looking statements we may make today during this teleconference are given in the context of today only. They contain risk factors that are subject to change possibly materially. We do not undertake any obligation to update these statements to reflect events subsequent to today, except as required by law. A list of our risk factors can be found in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2020, filed in August. We will also present some non-GAAP measures for which the reconciliations to GAAP are found at the end of each document that includes those measures, such as the press release or the investor presentation. With that, let me turn the call over to Dr. Chuck Mattera. Chuck?

Thank you, Mary Jane. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I am pleased to report that halfway through our fiscal year 2021, we are on track to deliver a strong year. Our revenue for Q2 was $787 million. It exceeded the top end of our guidance of $780 million and grew 18% over Q2 of fiscal year 2020. Among the many highlights this quarter were book-to-bill ratio of 1.17 for the quarter, leading to a 1.12 book-to-bill ratio on a rolling 12 month basis. We continue to execute on our ramp of 3d sensing VSCELs and delivered against an exceptionally strong demand, bringing shipments for the consumer end market to a record high of 15% of revenues. In addition, we delivered excellent growth and Life Sciences experienced continued recovering in industrial. And so continued strength in communications, aerospace and defense, the semiconductor capital equipment market and in silicon carbide. Our Q2 guidance contemplated a very strong 3d sensing quarter and we delivered on that. Our year-over-year growth in the consumer end market of over 200% was largely driven by 3d sensing. And again this quarter we shipped VSCEL arrays in production volumes for front facing, world facing and emerging applications as Giovanni will describe later. Communications grew 5% over the prior year including for both Datacom and Telecom. Life Sciences gained significant momentum. It grew almost 50% sequentially and more than 80% compared to Q2 of last year, as our products are vital components to the COVID-19 testing ecosystem. Industrial applications grew 10% sequentially across our product lines, as we continue to see a brisk recovery driven by increased demand for automotive production. Turning now to our focus on operational excellence. We are well ahead of our plan to achieve our three-year $150 million total synergy…

Thank you, Chuck. We appreciate our investors’ enthusiasm for our strategy and our successful track record of assessing long-term market opportunities, executing large scale M&A and developing technology platforms aimed at addressing major market mega trends. Augmented Reality, Autonomous Driving and Artificial Intelligence are among those mega trends which are enabled by 3d sensing. So this quarter I'm pleased to report that 3d sensing grew more than 140% sequentially. We believe this is significantly faster than the market growth rate. Both the Warren and Sherman fabs are operating very efficiently due to very solid execution and contributed equally to our 3d sensing revenue in the quarter. As Chuck said, 3d sensing growth came from shipments of production volumes of VCSEL arrays for multiple end customers, including for front facing and world facing applications as well as for other consumer electronics and automotive in cabin sensing. We're also making good progress expanding our customer base with additional wins, including in the Android ecosystem and personal computing platforms. Given this phenomenal results, I believe it would be worthwhile to review our multiyear trajectory in 3d sensing for the benefit of investors, who might be new to our story. Our 3d sensing work began in 2013 after the acquisition of the gallium arsenide platform, which among many things came with some of the industry's best bits of technology despite having zero footprint in the emerging 3d sensing market. We started mentioning the 3d sensing story publicly in 2016 to explain our acquisition of VCSEL fab operations in Warren, New Jersey, and Champaign, Illinois where we acquired the manufacturing foundation to strategically expand our gallium arsenide optoelectronics platform from three to six-inch for the large volumes required for the consumer electronics market. We said in our Investor Day in 2017 that entering the 3d…

Thank you, Giovanni and good morning. Our non-GAAP gross margin was 42% and the non-GAAP operating margin was 22%. The non-GAAP gross margin is 380 basis points ahead of the last II-VI reported pre-acquisition gross margin of 38.2%. And the non-GAAP operating margin is 630 basis points over the last II-VI reported pre-acquisition operating margin of 15.7%. These margins were driven especially by our synergies, a strong mix, improvement in transceiver margins and increased fab utilization. At the segment level, the non-GAAP operating margins were 17.4% for photonics and 29.3% for compound semiconductors. Similar to last quarter, compound semis margins were driven due to strength in 3d sensing shipments and increased fab utilization. Our backlog was a record $1.08 billion and consists of $680 million in photonics and $400 million in compound semiconductors. The backlog contains orders that will shift over the next 12 months. GAAP operating expenses, which are SG&A plus R&D were $204 million excluding amortization of $21 million, $24 million in stock-comp and $1.3 billion of M&A and integration costs. Non-GAAP OpEx was $158 million. Non-GAAP OpEx is 20% of revenue. And just over 500 basis points -- and 500 basis points below the OpEx percentage of revenue just prior to the close of the acquisition when it was nearly 26%, for II-VI and Finisar combined with amortization, stock-comp and transaction costs excluded. Quarterly GAAP EPS was $0.73 and non-GAAP EPS was $1.08 with non -- with after-tax non-GAAP adjustments of $43 million in total. The share count for the GAAP results was 115 million shares. For non-GAAP the share count was $124 million. The GAAP and non-GAAP EPS calculations are in the last two tables of the earnings release. Stock-comp was $28 million for the quarter, $4 million in cogs and $24 million in OpEx. This…

[Operator Instructions] Please stand-by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Mark Miller with The Benchmark Company.

Congratulations on another record quarter and the significant gains in the 3d sensing area. Just I have one question other expense -- could give us kind of a feeling for what it'll be next quarter because it's jumped around the last two quarters?

In the other income and expense?

Correct.

Generally speaking, I think it should really probably only be the FX with a little bit of the equity earnings from our equity investments. But the major driver that cost to change a lot this quarter was the INNOViON gain.

Okay. And so $7 million, $8 million?

I'd say it's probably similar to Q1.

Okay, thank you.

Sure.

Your next question comes from a line of Jed Dorsheimer with Canaccord Genuity.

Hi, thanks and congratulations on the quarter. My one question I guess is, if I look at the -- if I look at the strategy around compound semis, it seems that we're -- what we're seeing and what you're benefiting from is really a renaissance in the semiconductor industry that’s kind of takes us back or takes me back to the late 70s, early 80s on the silicon side, but today on the compounds. So I'm just wondering, is you kind of think through the end markets from silicon carbide, sapphire, indium phosphide all of which are kind of manufactured on various platforms. How do you -- how can you help investors think through the cost curves in terms of those cycles? Thanks.

Hi, Jed, good morning. This is Chuck, thanks for your question. It really is an exciting time for compound semiconductors. In general, the materials and devices have been around for many decades, as you know. And every time they have been invested in, they've been invested to enable new applications, or overcome challenges that the incumbent technology have that cause a -- either a constraint or an asymptote and performance. So they are enabled. And the value proposition ultimately has to be taken at the system level. When there's a clear enabling by the material and the component of the system itself then there's generally a pull by the ecosystem to be able to drive this technology. And it happened in the early days of gallium arsenide. For [Tencent and HBTs] around the side of radar infrastructure that was ultimately put in place and it led to the world that we see today. And that volume spilled over into the handset market. We see the benefit of that coming with gallium and silicon carbide even indium phosphide based electronics as the advent of the designs for example, if even 6G communications networks will rely and be enabled by such innovative devices that will come from the compound semiconductor market. I think that's probably all I can get into Giovanni would you like to add anything to that?

Oh, that's perfect Chuck.

Okay, Jed, I hope that.

Thanks. It does. Thanks, guys.

Your next question comes from a line of Paul Silverstein with Cowen.

Thanks guys. I guess what [it looks like] 3d sensing, Chuck and Giovanni, obviously, it's ramping nicely. Can you give us any additional insight in the demand outlook, especially in terms of the breadth of demand beyond just Apple, what you're looking at and your ability to continue to drive this type of growth? Obviously, large numbers, it's going to get harder as you go forward. And one other related question, I assume we should expect further margin uplift with the benefit of ongoing volume in 3d sensing?

Okay, Paul, thanks for the question. Definitely, the number of user cases and the interactions with a broad set of customers are increasing. We have -- as we said in the script we have some design wins in Android platforms, volumes are growing. We are all surprised that are not growing as fast as they should. But we are very, very, very bullish about long-term opportunities for the application as they especially it's a necessary function to enable those mega trends that we discussed, such as Autonomous Driving and Artificial Intelligence and so forth. So we are very confident that the demand will continue. So having a vertical integrated platform is going to be as we said sustainable advantage that we have. And then yes, definitely volumes help on the margin side, but I let -- maybe I'll let Mary Jane, comment on that part of the question. Mary Jane would like to add some?

I think 3d sensing continuing to gain volume is positive for the margins. Do keep in mind that the quarters across the year are not steady for 3d sensing. And typically, this past quarter, the 12/31 quarter is the strongest quarter. That is what we have seen in the past that may change as Giovanni said as we get an increase and other deployments. But for right now, I'd say volume definitely helps but it is not the same volume in every quarter.

Okay. Thank you.

Your next question comes from a line of Jim Ricchiuti with Needham & Company.

Hi, good morning. Maybe just to follow up on that comment, Mary Jane. In terms of seasonality, what should we be thinking about in terms of the puts and takes with respect to the March quarter? Just in terms of the larger verticals?

Yes, I would say first of all, we already through the first half of the year, Q1 we still expect to be our smallest quarter Q2 12/31 was strong for 3d sensing, as we just saw. We do expect to see that 3/31 quarter probably a little bit down on Q -- on the 12/31 quarter, some for Chinese New Year, we can't forget that. And also because I don't think 3d sensing will be as high exactly as it was in 12/31. And then the 6/30 quarter for us which has historically been our strongest quarter. We had such a good quarter this quarter, it may be on par a little bit hard. But for right now I'd say generally speaking, I think just basically do not forget, Chinese New Year and the 3/31 quarter.

And it's 3d sensing industrial and the optical communication seasonality in the March. I'm wondering how we should be thinking about that?

Well, I'm not sure we can give it to you exactly. But generally, we don't see it in the -- for industrial the first quarter the 9/30 quarter tends to be the weakest quarter. Communications can sometimes be a tossup between 12/31 and 3/31. But generally speaking, it is Chinese New Year. So I think you should calculate that in. And then I think the other markets are probably less subject to specific seasonality in any given exact quarter three.

Yes. So, Jim, I want to add Mary Jane. Yes, the seasonality some time are offset by market reality. I'll give an example. We anticipate to ship more than double the megawatts that we ship in the second -- sorry in the first half of the fiscal year, in the second year. So we will double our megawatts in the second half of the year for industrial applications, particularly of course, fiber lasers. So that's a really substantial increase in the second half which is not necessarily linked to any seasonality. It just specific to China coming back very strong with fiber lasers, which -- we are benefiting from that growth.

Got it. Thank you for that color.

Let me just clarify one answer I gave Mark, he was asking us about non-Op income and expense. I forgotten the first quarter we had write-off of the debt costs. Generally speaking, it's probably somewhere between 2 million and 3 million positive. We can take the next question now.

Your next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya with Bank of America Securities.

Thanks for taking my question. I was hoping you could give us a quick update on your silicon carbide franchise. How much does silicon carbide account for as a percentage of sales? What are the next milestones we should be looking forward to? And recently, one of your competitors spoke about increasing their investments and 200 millimeter capability. And I was wondering how that impacts the competitive landscape going forward? Thank you.

So silicon carbides between 3% and 4% of the revenue and I'll give the second part to Chuck.

Okay, thanks Vivek. Thanks for your question. As we've indicated there's a long-term growth opportunity for us. And we're playing it just like you would play a golf course, one hole at a time. We have the end in mind that we've described that to investors, we think pretty clearly, we have a scalable silicon carbide substrate platform, which was demonstrated to be capable of supporting a 200 millimeter technology about five years ago. So we're investing in scaling that capability of our silicon carbide substrate. A considerable amount of our capital investment that Mary Jane referred to earlier, is focused on adding equipment for silicon carbide crystal growth epitaxial, wafer growth, ion implantation tools and to provide a clear technology roadmap for electronic devices and ultimately for modules. There's a multiyear platform investment. And I think the best way for investors to think about it is the same way in which Giovanni gave a retrospective view of how we thought about the six-inch gallium arsenide vertically integrated platform development back more than five years ago. It's going to take us some time to put all the pieces into place that we envision but we have the talent. We have the team. We have the technology. And now we have to get the infrastructure in place and get to a scale that we ultimately aim to be. And that's all line of sight inside our near-term and long range plan. I think that's probably the best way to say it Vivek.

Okay. Thank you, Chuck.

Sure.

Your next question comes from the line of Richard Shannon with Craig-Hallum.

Well, thanks guys for taking my questions. A question focused on Datacom probably a two part here. I heard some comments about your 200 gig and 400 gig transceivers doubling sequentially, can help us understand what's going on there. And then kind of look forward broadly speaking across the space for both web scale and 5G, how do you see this calendar year developing?

Okay, Richard, this Giovanni. Thanks for your question. What's going on? We're getting share obviously, pretty fast too. I think the team has done an incredible job with these new platforms. And it's very exciting. I'm sorry, what was the second part of the question on 5G?

Dynamics in Datacom going forward through the year, especially the web scale and 5G some of your peers in the market talk about we have a slower start to the year but accelerating as 5G starts to accelerate the latter half of the year?

Yes, well, the reality is that because of COVID, lot of deployments worldwide is actually they've actually been slowed down. I mean, that doesn't mean that the trend is any different than before still a important mega trends for us. I think we've seen a channel ads being the dominant need for the end customers rather than new deployments. So that that's a dynamic there for example, I think we've seen more, more client systems being added and line systems being added and so forth. So those are the dynamics in terms of the demand. I want to emphasize the growth that we've seen in the Datacom little bit stronger than Telecom and then remind the -- this important point I made on the 800G. First 800G shipments that we made, it was really successful so far, we've exciting to add it to our portfolio. And it's -- all in all, I think we are going back to a really nice growth with the Finisar team which for over a year, a lot of customers were probably on the sidelines waiting for the integration to happen. Now they feel more confident as the numbers demonstrate that we are doing a pretty good job integrating the two companies so that’s this has been very key.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ananda Baruah with Loop Capital.

Hi, good morning guys. Congrats on the solid [technical difficulty] taking the question. I guess, just a bigger picture on, Chuck, in the press release this morning you made mention of all markets improving? And so I was just wondering because you put some context is improving. And so I was just wondering, could you put some context around the key ones there? And which market opportunities would you like us to think of as making the most significant impact this year as you move through the year? Thanks.

Well, I think -- I think we summarized pretty well in the script, the dynamics and everyone of the end markets, whether Communications, Industrial, Semi Com, Life Sciences, 3d sensing, et cetera. I think all of those markets have a great opportunity to really make an impact on the year, communications is obviously the largest 3d sensing is ramping beautifully. Silicon carbide is coming up the curve. So I think, really -- they really all can make a great contribution to the year and I think the ones you want to think about are either the largest ones or the ones that are really starting to gain traction in the revenue.

And just -- Mary Jane just quick clarification on that. Chuck's comments in the press release about markets improving, so should we anticipate that the key market, the growth can be stronger as we go through the year? How about some context around that can be --?

I think we already answered that question. I think we already answered that question. We're showing very nice growth in the year across all the markets it’s in the script and I think we probably -- unfortunately need to move on.

Your next question comes from the line of John Marchetti with Stifel.

Thanks very much. Mary Jane, you guys identified an additional 50 million of synergies that you're expecting here over the next 12 months or so just curious with the scale now, should we expect most of those are coming through additional cost synergies on the OpEx line or are there additional opportunities that you still seem to chop away and improve on the gross margin line is in relation specifically to this 50 million target?

I think it's both on the cost of sales and in the OpEx.

And is that again a function of larger scale? Are you able to actually identify programs that where you can physically take some of those costs out? Thanks.

Well, let me add John but we need to move on that scale has a lot of benefits. And we will have exact targets for both the cost of sales and for our overall expenses. And we will achieve it.

Thanks, Chuck.

Your next question comes from the line of Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler. Your line is open? Harsh Kumar your line is open. Are you on mute?

Yes, sorry about that. Hey guys congratulations on strong results. Chuck, I wanted to ask you, is your gross margin of 42% that you put up? Is that the new paradigm? Is that how we should be thinking about things going forward? And then when we think about OpEx for you guys, you've done a great job containing it relative to expectations. But how should we think of the cadence going forward? Do you manage that as a percentage of business or do you manage that as a percentage of revenue growth? Just any color? Yes that's it for me. Thanks.

Right. The gross margin range for the year is 38 to 42. And the OpEx margin is in the -- we put them in investor presentations, excluding stock-comp as well. It's between 20% and 23% of revenue.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Samik Chatterjee with JP Morgan.

Thank you, thanks for taking the question. I think primarily for Chuck. Chuck, you've got done a great job getting the leverage down since the Finisar acquisition. And that gives you a lot of flexibility. I'm just wondering, do you see a need to further consolidate the market either be it for new platforms or certain end markets where you have better -- you can get a greater benefits from scale, compared to what you have today? Just want to get your thoughts on that. Thank you.

Okay, thanks for your comments and for your question Samik. We have a long-term aspiration to change the world. And we're doing it with the benefit of innovation. And being able to identify the long-term trends in the marketplace that will take full advantage of that innovation or be enabled by it. We're not going to investing, we have a strategy. It's well articulated. And we have been executing on it for decades in the last five years or so, investors have really gotten to know that. I don't see any change to that. And for sure, no change to our discipline and our determination to build long-term our shareholder value and to have a profound impact on the stakeholders all around this is a result. We have lots of investing to do, lots of imagining to do and lots of executing to do and we're going to do a combination of [Q3].

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Sidney Ho with Deutsche Bank.

Thanks for taking my question and congrats on the very solid results in 3d sensing business. So my question is actually on the com side. I think Chuck you mentioned last quarter, it was impacted by slowdown, new system installation. I'm curious if you start seeing the recovery of that part of the business yet. And if you look into your orders and backlog, are there particular areas that you see strengths or weaknesses over the next few quarters. Thanks.

Sidney, can you repeat the first part of your question? Mary Jane will comment on the backlog. But what was the first part of your question?

Yes, you were talking about last quarter was impacted by slowdown with new system installation. I'm just curious, what have you seen the recovery already in that business? And then the second part of that is related to the backlog of orders that, do you see anything particular areas of strength or weaknesses coming up from orders of backlog? Thank you.

I think there's a recovery underway, there's still spots around the world where COVID-19 has had and is having still an impact. The effects, the profound effects of COVID-19 simply cannot be understated. So that's happening. And I would say the supply chain has been a lot of talk about the integrated circuit supply chain and how that might be an overlay to COVID-19. And so that's another topic but I'm proud to say that our global supply chain management team have really done a fantastic job. And working with our vendors in mitigating the impact thus far. So we have to watch that. I would say the supply chain is what I'm going to be looking out for in the next three to six months. Okay.

I don't think that we break the backlog down further then by segment. I don't know that there's a particular area of strength or not.

Thank you, Sidney.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from a line of Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson.

Hey, good morning and thanks for the question. Maybe for Giovanni, how do you view the long-term opportunity in LiDAR versus your current [uptick] in the 3d sensing for the handsets? And is your capacity for 3d sensing [tangible] to LiDAR or is it going to require some type of different technology as well?

No, we have -- thanks for the question Tom. So absolutely, it's a great opportunity for us, I want to make sure that this is clear, LiDAR market despite all of the noise in the media and so forth, is still in its infancy for advanced optical solutions which includes lasers, and all kinds of optics and secretaries and so forth. We as I mentioned in the script we have a very broad probably one of the broadest portfolios for both actives and passives, we have different wavelengths, different comp factors for the lasers, different type of sub assemblies and support. So we are well positioned to take advantage of the interaction with the, the engagements that we have with the number of customers at different level of the food chain. And in terms of the technology, I think we already have, pretty much all that is needed. Question is where really to put the bets. Because as I said in the script, it's sometimes -- it's hard to predict which solution will be the largest volume, there is different beliefs out there in terms of what's the best approach to give the best performance with the highest reliability and the best eventually price target for the automotive customers. So it's going to take a while to flush that out. And as I said we are right now we have pretty much all that the market is asking us to deliver. But the winners, in terms of the adoption of this or that architecture, it will take time for that to play out and to happen. So but I think we are well positioned for that.

Okay, that's helpful. Thank you.

You are welcome.

Your next question comes from the line of Tom O'Malley with Barclays.

Hey guys, thanks for taking my question and congrats on the really nice results. My question is for Giovanni, you saw the industrial business trough in the September quarter and you see some M&A going on in the space. Can you talk about what's going on there? And you mentioned, you're going to double your megawatts in the second half of the year for fiber lasers. Is that just volume in China coming back or is the high-end of the market a little bit better? Any color on how that markets progressing off the bottom will be really helpful.

Thanks, Tom. I mean, thanks for the question. So it's just China is coming back very fast from that perspective, as I mentioned, and that's a large majority of our markets, really the, as you know there is a many fiber laser makers in China and we are benefiting from our design wins and their growth. So we are growing with them. And I assume, I believe they are also taking share for some of -- from some of the incumbents worldwide incumbents. So they're really making great progress. I think it's the largest growth, I believe is really for laser processing for the durable goods. So I think the micro processing or such as you know marking or [software] maybe that's a smaller portion of the total. Anyway, so that's some color. It is very exciting. I mean, we have the reason why we can support such a really great demand coming back particularly from China is because we moved also our 980 multimode pumps to six-inch. So we have the capability. And I'm -- I can't say for sure. But I think we are the only one in the world that has such a volume, such a scale capability for -- to address their markets. So we're taking advantage of that.

Thanks, Giovanni.

Your next question comes from the line of Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna.

Thanks for the question. Congrats on the quarter. And I wanted to chime in on the one question policy and paid for the call. I appreciate that. So congrats on the 3d sensing result, but perhaps for us, at least, the photonics and TC and DC was maybe a little bit light here. It was nice to see backlog up here. But I would assume that's really implies some sort of a supply issue, maybe talk about that. Is it increasing the supply issues? Where do we stand on new capacity and new supply? Did 3d sensing temporarily take some of that capacity are they held separate? And is the CapEx like $40 million a quarter enough to solve some of these supply constraints? Thanks.

Thanks for your question. It sounded -- it sounds like there were three or four questions in one. But let me talk about the supply chain. In the quarter despite the fact that we had a view of what it could be, our supply chain people managed it to be pretty close to zero impact. So we're watching it because we understand the challenges associated with the demand, especially in the in the snapback of the automotive production and the demand for integrated circuit capacity from other markets. But we do have some constraints. And we'll continue to manage those in the supply chain. And we're adding capacity so that our internal or intercompany supply chain can keep pace with the projections in the growth. And as far as the 3d sensing goes, we're increasingly utilizing the capacity we have. So there's no impact at all from the supply chain to that. Okay.

Thank thanks, Chuck.

Yes, you bet.

Your next question comes from the line of Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley.

Great, thanks. And just on the 3d sensing portfolio, you guys mentioned also having a passive kind of piece of the portfolio with the filters and other products. I just wanted to get a sense of, as you report 3d sensing revenue today, is that primarily VCSEL? And then just as you look forward to the next year, in the next 12 months would you still expect growth to primarily be driven by share gains or kind of new platforms coming on? Thanks.

Hi, Meta thanks for the question. This is Giovanni.

Go ahead Giovanni.

Yes, I'm sorry. Yes, the -- Mary Jane do you want to take it?

This also the majority of the volume, I do think over the next year, we will see as Giovanni already described that there may be other platforms emerging. But as he also said, it's a little bit dependent on the market demand. But we're looking forward to seeing those opportunities materialize. I think at this point, I'm sorry we have a little bit run out of time. I just want to turn it back to Chuck for a few minutes. And as all of you know, we have a scheduled call with all of you following this call. Let me turn it back over to Chuck.

Okay. Thank you, Mary Jane. As 2021 the year of the Ox begins, my enthusiasm for our future is at an all time high. And we continue to look forward to leverage the best opportunities that arise from the most exciting and irreversible market mega trends we can address. Although I acknowledge the sobering reality of COVID-19 a challenge to all humanity. COVID-19 has affected the health, safety and economic security of a large number of people around the world. However, I am confident that humanity will rise to this and the other important challenges facing our planet. At II-VI, we realized that we must do everything we possibly can to protect our planet and carefully manage this precious and finite resources. In order to ensure that future generations will inherit from us, a world that's better and more sustainable. In doing so, we expect that II-VI will play an increasingly significant role in enabling the world to become safer, healthier, closer and more efficient. This is our mission to which I remain is firmly committed to is ever. While we are executing well, we are doing so out of the strength of our shared belief of our values of integrity, collaboration, accountability, respect and enthusiasm or as we say, at II-VI, I care. Beyond these values, I believe that we hold in common the belief that equality and affordable education provides opportunities to a better life today and a better world tomorrow. Based on those shared principles, it's with great generosity the II-VI Co-Founder, Dr. Carl Johnson and his wife Margot Johnson established in 2007, the II-VI Foundation. Through their foundation Carl and Margot have funded the college and university education of many students around the world. Many of them have joined II-VI, and some are now in key…

Thank you ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.