Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the II-VI Incorporated Fiscal Year 2022 Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mary Jane Raymond, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Catherine. Good morning. I’m Mary Jane Raymond, the Chief Financial Officer here at II-VI Incorporated. Welcome to our earnings call today for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. With me today on the call are Dr. Chuck Mattera, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer; and Dr. Giovanni Barbarossa, our Chief Strategy Officer and the President of the Compound Semiconductors Segment. This call is being recorded on Wednesday, August 24, 2022. For today’s call, the press release and the investor presentation are available on the Investor Relations tab of our website, ii-vi.com. Today’s discussion includes certain non-GAAP measures. A detailed reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to our GAAP results is included in today’s documents. I remind you that during this call, we will be making certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements made today. Our comments should be viewed in the context of the risk factors detailed in our most recent 10-K filing for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, and our subsequent SEC filings. Our Form 10-K for fiscal year ended June 30, 2022 is expected to be filed on August 29th. II-VI assumes no obligation to update the information discussed in this conference call, except as required by law. With that, let me turn the call over to Dr. Chuck Mattera. Chuck?

Thank you, Mary Jane. Welcome, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. FY22 was truly extraordinary in every conceivable way, starting with our financial results. We completed our fourth fiscal quarter of 2022 with revenue of $887 million, an increase of 7% over the third quarter in 2022, and an increase of 10% over the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021. We achieved operating income in Q4 FY22 of $114 million and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $0.98. These results are new records for fourth quarter revenue, strong quarterly year-over-year growth numbers and reflect sustained demand across our businesses. Our quarterly results reflect the resilience to a challenging operating environment, including the ongoing and profound in-quarter impact caused by the pandemic, a dynamic regulatory environment and persisting supply chain challenges. In the face of these headwinds, our global team rose to the occasion every day with extraordinary effort and care for our employees and achieved an incredible success. There is an undeniable plumb line running directly from the Finisar acquisition and our collective long and deep history of dedicating ourselves to excellence, including as reflected in the results we report today. We completed the Finisar acquisition on September 24, 2019, right before the effects of the pandemic were first felt by the world. At the time, we believe that the depth and breadth of the technologies and manufacturing scale of the newly combined company would enable our growth by addressing the long-term mega trends in our markets, including cloud computing and the advent of 5G wireless networks. We were right in our beliefs and so we turned our intense focus to executing on our strategy leveraging our technology and worldwide manufacturing platforms, identifying and closing gaps, delivering against our synergy targets and improving our operating leverage. As a result of the…

Thank you, Chuck, and good morning, everyone. We had a great fourth quarter with meaningful growth in communications and industrial. Communications revenue grew 8% compared to Q4 of last year and 4% sequentially. Our datacom business grew 14% compared to Q4 of last year, with strong growth in transceivers, modules and photonic components. Our growth is a testament to our technology leadership supported by proactive supply chain management and collaborative long-range planning with a broad customer base. For the market studies we have done, the datacom market is expected to grow in the next five years at a 12% compounded annual growth rate, despite current macro sentiments. The double-digit growth is in line with recent analyst reports that forecast global data center CapEx spend to be quite robust, growing to over $370 billion by 2026, with hyperscalers accounting for more than half of that amount. Shipments to hyperscalers of our higher data rate transceivers at 200G and beyond were 4 times higher than in fiscal year 2021 and drove the majority of the growth of our datacom business in fiscal year 2022. As the cloud and hyperscale data center market transition to 25 and 50 terabits per second, which is the demand for our 800G transceivers is picking up. In fact, we are now shipping meaningful volumes of 800G transceivers. We are confident that our industry-leading 200G indium phosphide lasers and detectors will become the components of choice for this upgrade cycle. Our 200G per lane lasers and detectors will be needed in reducing cost and energy per bit and will serve as a solid foundation for our next-generation 1.6 terabit per second transceivers. We are pleased to report that we had a record revenue for our datacom VCSELs, which was driven by a successful ramp of the latest generation…

Thanks, Giovanni. For these entire remarks, I will speak about legacy II-VI results only, unless otherwise noted. The quarterly and full year end market and geographic breakdown of our $887 million of Q4 revenue and $3.3 billion of fiscal year ‘22 revenue can be found on pages 20 to 24 of the investor presentation. We show you fiscal year ‘22 complete by the legacy II-VI market breakdown and then by the new market breakdown. We also supply the mapping from the legacy markets to the simplified four end markets on page 23. For legacy II-VI only, networking and materials, Industrial was 21% of total fiscal year ‘22 revenue, Communications was 65%, Electronics was 10% and Instrumentation was 4%. Including the former Coherent, the laser segment, using their trailing 12-month revenue, the pro forma annual end-market fiscal year ‘22 breakdown is Industrial, 38%; Communications, 45%; Electronics, 7%; and Instrumentation 10%. Returning to II-VI results. Our Q4 non-GAAP gross margin was 38.7%, and the non-GAAP operating margin was 19%. As a reminder, last quarter included $8 million of progress payments on development programs being partially supported by customers, affecting the gross margin by $4.4 million and the operating margin by $8 million total with $3.6 million being an offset to R&D. Supply chain costs and COVID cost, a total of $8.6 million are not excluded to arrive at non-GAAP results. The margins are affected by the typical costs associated with the initial launch of new products. At the segment level, the non-GAAP operating margins were 15.3% for Photonics and 26.6% for Compound Semiconductors. Our record backlog of $2.3 billion consists of $1.6 billion for Photonics and $0.7 billion for Compound Semiconductors. This increase in backlog is a function of demand, in particular, from the industrial, semiconductor capital equipment and communications end markets.…

Thank you, again, Mary Jane and Giovanni. I would like to close our fiscal year ‘22 earnings call with some special recognition. First and foremost, I would like to recognize and thank each and every one of our worldwide employees for your hard work, dedication to excellence in everything you do and for caring so much for one another this past year. Without your daily dedication to excellence, we would not have been able to meet the extraordinary technical, operational and financial challenges and achieve the lofty goals we set for ourselves in FY22, while laying the foundation for an even brighter future. You are really making the world a safer, healthier, closer and more efficient place to live. I would also like to thank our thousands of dedicated suppliers for your support over the past several years and especially this last fiscal year. It’s been a truly challenging, dynamic and unique business environment, and we really appreciate your help in achieving our goal of serving our customers. And to our customers, thank you for your continued confidence and support. It’s an honor to serve you and enable your continued success and to be an intimate part of building your future. I look forward to a tremendous future together, and we will do our absolute best to continue to serve you. Finally, I would also like to thank all of our shareholders and debt holders who have invested in us, entrusted us with your confidence and given us enormous opportunity and responsibility to succeed. We take your trust and confidence and our responsibility very seriously. For those on the call, we welcome your questions, and we expect to end this call not later than 10 a.m. Eastern Time this morning. Catherine, you may open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Paul Silverstein with Cowen.

First off, again, the backdrop of what appears to be awfully broad strength, so, what’s the opportunity for great improvement from here with respect to revenue? And then, if I could have a follow-up, and the follow-up would be with respect to coherent and industrial, in particular, what’s the exposure to macro?

Paul, I wasn’t able to hear. Can you just summarize the two? Is the greatest opportunity for revenue, was that the first part?

Greatest opportunity for improvement. Obviously, you’re discussing broad strength, but where is the greatest opportunity for improvement from a revenue perspective by product market? However you want to frame it. And then, what’s the -- how much of the industrial business, how much Coherent would be macro leverage versus how much of it is relatively independent from macro?

Okay. Maybe Giovanni will take the question.

Yes. Hey Paul, thanks for the question. So when we announced the combination with Coherent, there were 4 markets we thought that we’re going to be very synergistic, not only in general, for the cost structure of the two companies combined, but mostly about the revenue. That’s what your question is about. So, we haven’t really quantified those, but those four are really around industrial, the semi cap and display markets and then life sciences and aerospace and defense. We can go a little bit more in details in industrial. We think there is an opportunity on the cutting market, which we are now really currently serving from a fiber laser standpoint, but I think there is an opportunity to gain share there, thanks to the combined cost structure of the company. In the semi cap and display market standpoint, I think we have an opportunity to leverage a combined portfolio that is pretty unique in the industry from a laser system standpoint as well as part and component standpoint that we are supplying to similar customers. So, there is a tremendous portfolio synergies to be leveraged. And then, life sciences, I think the most important of revenue opportunity really ultimately comes from the incredibly capillary and very well positioned sales force of Coherent in the market, which is substantially larger than what we had II-VI before the combination. And last but not least, aerospace and defense between energy, high-energy laser weapons and other advanced application, I think the two companies have a portfolio of products that is pretty unique, particularly to serve the U.S. market.

Okay. Well, maybe for the second part of your question, for sure, more than half of it, I would say, about 70% perhaps, but I want to make clear that part -- even the part which is connected to the macro, as you outlined, they’ve done a really solid job of even in some parts of the economy where there’s been a slowdown, they still have been successful in penetrating with differentiated products. Their footprint is extraordinary. Their service component is also a capillary component of the business. And I would look back and just point out that maybe 18 months ago when we modeled and had an expectation for what they could do in our fiscal year ‘22, they came in right in line with it, despite some softness in some parts of the economy. So, leverage maybe 70%. That’s a rough estimate, but very, very strong and differentiated within it.

Sure. Just to clarify, based on the press release that they are putting out, their business obviously was trending significantly positive since the deal was first announced. Can you share any insight in terms of what you’re seeing with respect to orders that they were seeing on the industrial side? It doesn’t sound like there’s been a downturn relative to macro or otherwise, but that’s the question.

Yes. No, not really. I mean the only softness that we saw over the past 12 months was really in China, and that’s picking up. So, we were down year-over-year because of China. But now, Q4 is actually picking up as China as a market, about 7%, and it’s distributed between industrial -- mostly industrial and then some communications and life sciences. So, that’s -- it’s very, very encouraging. And then, with respect to Europe and rest of the world, North America, et cetera, I think the -- as we have said, inductors being very strong across the board, component level, subsystem levels, consumable or aftermarket numbers are still very strong, which indicate a very strong laser utilization for durable goods manufacturing.

Thank you. And we have a question from Ananda Baruah with Loop Capital.

Hey. Congrats on getting this done and on the strong June quarter execution, and thanks for all the great detail today. I really appreciate it. I just have one, if I could. Just with legacy Coherent, could you guys give us some sense of where they are in their microelectronics and display cycle since there have been comments around that for a while. And in that context, how we should think about where they are in their profitability cycle as well. Is it tracking with consistent cycles for where they are at this point in the cycle? And that’s it for me, really appreciate it.

Ananda, thank you for your question. I would come back across the board and just reiterate what I said. The model that we had that we built during our diligence before the process settled down, we expected them to have a performance across the four market segments -- business market segments. They delivered in line. Despite the challenges that we all had in operating, they delivered in line with what we expected. I would say it’s been very steady, very solid progress, and there have been no surprises. Then I’m expecting it to continue to be along that same plumb line.

That’s really helpful, Chuck. Any context on where in that cycle they are?

Well, Ananda, this is Giovanni. Thanks for your question. I think, definitely in the past, the leadership from an OLED market standpoint was very, very strong. And you can expect that relationship with display manufacturers continues -- has continued over the years. And the team is working on next-generation displays, which will likely beat OLED, will probably be micro-LED driven and so forth. And so, if you think about the timing of when those technologies will come to market will be a few years. And so, we need to get ready for that market to pick up and create some strong demand for us. And I think from a development -- from a technology standpoint, from a product development standpoint, from a customer engagement, I think -- we believe that we’ll still be the leader in the market, the strong interactions, strong technology platforms uniquely differentiated in many ways that will get ready at the right time for the ramp for the production of micro LEDs. I mean, we said when we talked about Coherent and we -- I used at least this way to characterize. We think that the -- ultimately, the laser platform as an offering is future proof. And displays are going to be around for a while. And no matter the technology, you still will rely on laser processes to manufacture displays, whether they’re OLED, they’re micro LEDs, et cetera. And I think the reference for quite some time will be the Coherent team that now is part of the company, and we think very, very strong about the leadership market wise from that standpoint.

Thanks, Giovanni. Ananda, thanks for your question. I would only add, any such transitions when they happen, you can expect it will not only be there, but that we expect to lead this part of it.

Our next question comes from Dave Kang with B. Riley.

Just a question on Infineon. I believe they have signed a two-year supply agreement with Showa Denko last year. Just wondering if you are splitting Infineon with Showa, or any kind of color as far as the terms of the contract?

Hey Dave. Good morning. It’s Giovanni. Thanks for your question. We -- I can’t refer to other agreements that our customers have. I only know that we signed a very compelling long-term and large agreement with them to support the growth. That’s all I can say.

David, I would add, thanks for your question, Dave. I would add the industry ecosystem includes companies who provide epitaxial wafers. And we are suppliers to -- even to that element of the ecosystem. I would only ask you to bear that in mind.

My follow-up on 3DS with this particular -- the lead smartphone customer, is it just still you and Lumentum, or has there been additional supplier in that supply chain?

Thanks, Dave. It’s hard to say. We definitely -- as the numbers kind of can tell you, definitely we believe we’ve been gaining significant share year-over-year, quarter-over-quarter. And ultimately, what really counts is the -- in a world where the product has to be replaceable, it has to be able to be replaced by competition then the major differentiation really come down to cost and quality and then the roadmap that we have with the customers. So, we think that from a cost structure standpoint, given our complete level of vertical integration. And then from a quality standpoint, as we reported over the past several quarters, reporting quarter-over-quarter zero DPPM shipments. I think we welcome additional competition. But for now, our growth and our share gains, including some new design wins is demonstrated by the numbers that we have reported.

We have a question from Mark Miller with Benchmark.

Congratulations on your record sales and closing the Coherent acquisition. Your Compound Semiconductors sales were up, but operating income was down and so was margins. I was wondering if you can give us some color on that.

Compound Semiconductors?

Thank you for your question, Mark. Let’s give it a second.

So, the operating margin for Compound Semiconductors was lower in the quarter because last quarter, which I imagine is your comparison, we had the $8 million of customer support of payments for new development were all in that segment. And if you look at $8 million on Compound Semiconductors third quarter, roughly $260 million in revenue, mid 3 points of margin. So, it’s a significant amount, almost four actually. But generally speaking, I would say that’s one thing. And the second thing is that they, as Giovanni talked about, had launches of new products that -- for which you have seen the start-up costs in the past that launched in the quarter and they usually that those early volumes usually have a little bit of a dampening effect on the margin.

With companies like Western Digital and Micron significantly lowering their outlook for next fiscal year, are you concerned -- datacom has been very strong. Just was wondering about hyperscale CapEx over the next year. Are you worried about they’re going to cut that because of weak consumer demand?

No, definitely not, Mark. We -- as I said in the prepared remarks, demand for higher data rate transceivers, 200G and beyond is very strong. We said that demand increased 4x year-over-year. So, it’s really strong. And we just don’t see any of that in our customers’ demand. So, I can’t comment on those two companies that you mentioned.

Our next question comes from Jim Ricchiuti with Needham.

Mary Jane, I know there are a lot of puts and takes with respect to gross margins, but I’m wondering if you can provide any way to think about gross margins for the combined company, looking out in Q1, just given supply chain. And I don’t know if you want to provide some color as to what kind of a revenue impact we might see from supply chain challenges.

So, with respect to the margin, first of all, probably over the next few weeks, we’ll put out a combined pro forma comparison for past quarters. But I would say, going into Q1, so in this quarter, first of all, we had the kind of launch costs, so to speak, of newer products starting up. And we did have the absence of the lift we had last quarter, but that was always called out as a onetime. Going into fiscal year ‘22 for margins overall. I would imagine that the Company still has a very good shot at that margin being over 40%. But in terms of having a finalized model on what we think to put out a new range, as I say, we’ll probably have that over the next few weeks. But generally speaking, Coherent is positive in our margins. And I think we look forward to the improvements that we’ll see as we continue to go forward, especially with -- in Giovanni’s segment, as his products launch, they have, as we’ve said many times before, the most ability to move the margin, whether that be any form of laser that we have or silicon carbide.

Got it. And just a quick follow-up. When you talk about that 70% of that Coherent business being macro related, Chuck, you’re talking also the excimer laser annealing the ELA business, the OLED portion of the business. And I wonder if you can characterize the line of sight you have to their bookings and backlog over the next two years, just given what we’re hearing about new fab capacity additions, particularly in China.

Yes. We won’t be able to comment or size what you’re looking for over the next -- for the next few years on this call today, Jim. But suffice it to say, we think there’s still a very good and strong opportunity, and we’re excited about it.

Our next question comes from Samik Chatterjee with JPMorgan.

Congrats from my side as well. I just have one quick one. And I was hoping to dive a bit into the electronics market in which you’re outlining the strongest growth process, although understand it’s sort of a smaller portion of your revenue right now. But, if you can sort of help me think about the $11 billion TAM that you’re outlining, how much of that is sort of the big buckets of electric vehicle sources, 3D sensing? And when I think about the 17% CAGR, is it going to be more back-end loaded because of electric vehicles, or I would think 3D sensing is a bit more front-end loaded in that time horizon. So, just trying to think about sort of how to think about the implication of that 17% CAGR to your business? So, any help there would be helpful -- useful.

Thanks, Samik. Good morning. This is Giovanni. Thanks for your questions. So, on the -- now the electronics includes what used to be the consumer electronics, and that’s very much the largest portion of the growth that we’ve included in our guidance as well as generally speaking, for the future. And the reason is it comes down to what we talked about in the past, which is an expansion of our addressable market beyond 3D sensing into sensing. And so, that’s -- while we gained -- we continue to gain share on 3D sensing. There is a larger portion of the market, which is the sensing, which includes definition a 3D sensing, where we are gaining share and having new design wins, all photonics-related. Thanks to a portfolio of products, which is second to none, between filters, the diffractive optics, materials, of course, lasers, photodiodes et cetera. So, there is an opportunity for us to grow in a much larger market than 3D sensing. And then, on the automotive side, it’s all driven primarily by our substrate sales, our silicon carbide substrate sales. And we continue to sign new contracts, long-term contracts. And right now, our growth is mostly limited by capacity, not by demand. Demand is very, very strong, and we’ll keep eye. We are continuing to add capacity. As you remember, we announced a $1 billion investment over the next five years. We are spending capital to increase the -- growth year-over-year, and that’s coming on line fast but not fast enough to kind of saturate the market. So, we have we have room for growth from that standpoint as soon as we bring back -- we bring capacity on line.

I would only add, Samik, maybe an awkward way to put a really fine point on it. If you look at the second half of the decade, this opportunity that we see will really be driven by silicon carbide power electronics. As Giovanni said, the materials in the devices and modules will start to kick in and it will be driven in our model and then our forecast by the adoption of electric vehicles and other components that require high-voltage, high-reliability devices. We said that we expect to be at a level to offer into the marketplace and so in about five years from now, 1 million 6-inch equivalent substrates of silicon carbide per year beginning in about five years. So it’s that second half that we’re looking at. And that’s what we’re investing for and getting organized for now in addition to growing in the short term because the market is supply limited.

Our next question comes from Simon Leopold with Raymond James.

I wanted to just maybe dig a little bit deeper on understanding the trends for Coherent, industrial exposure, specifically. And I think people maybe alluded to this earlier, but Applied Materials talked about some weakness in flat panels. And I don’t presume that Coherent really has much business from that market. I think Giovanni talked about this as an opportunity longer term, and I think it’s more tied to smartphones. And so, if you could help us understand maybe some of those key drivers for the industrial aspects of Coherent, I think I’m looking at what’s coming, not what’s happened over the past year. And then, just a quick follow-up, if you could share with us roughly the mix shift in your datacom transceivers as to how much of the revenue is 200 gig and above now versus, let’s say, one year ago and how you see that trending? Thank you.

Hey Simon. First of all, I want to make sure that I clarify 1 point. In our definition, industrial is about manufacturing of durable goods, not consumer electronics products. So that -- it’s more on the what used to be called, I believe, microelectronics in the Coherent kind of market classification. And now, it is going to be called basically industrial in our classification. Just to make sure, not confused the two because we use to industrial like fiber laser cutting, the CO2 lasers and so forth. And now we are putting under the new industrial is including more, let’s say, the larger portion of the market. So, in terms of displays, I can’t comment on what Applied Materials has reported. I can tell you that the demand is for those kind of products, I would say, it’s stable. I think that the -- as I alluded earlier, growth will come significantly when new technologies and new user cases will make into the market. And then, I think your second question was -- I forgot, it was about the consumer?

No, about your datacom transceiver -- get a better understanding of how your mix has shifted to the higher performance products, maybe year-over-year -- and if you have that handy?

So, the vast -- so we like to divide the market in three buckets in terms of the hyperscalers, the -- let’s say, the average scalers and then the long tail. We have about, let’s say -- our market -- and that’s important because the high data rates are clearly -- they mostly go into hyperscalers. And then the long tail, it’s all about 10G and above up to 200G. And therefore, so let’s say that the hyperscale is about 1/3 of the datacom number. We have about 20 to 30 mid-sized web scale operators that’s another 1/3, and then the last is actually almost 4,000 customers, of which probably 300 are the bulk. So, that’s the kind of the way this is. Now, if you think about -- so if you think about high data rate, I would say that -- I would call it like 30% of the demand goes into hyperscalers. And again, the -- again, that’s mostly by -- and the customer is driving the demand for 200, 400 and even 800G, which we’re shipping already. So, I hope that gives you enough color. It’s all about hyperscaler driving higher data rates and the rest of the market driving, let’s say, legacy 200 and below demand.

A fine point on your answer. It’s the hyperscalers that are driving your growth. The rest of the market you’d characterize as stable. Is that accurate?

No, no, not at all. No. It’s driving the growth of the high data rate.

Okay.

Yes. The hyperscalers are driving the growth of the high data rate, but the low data rate also growing. It’s just not necessarily a 200G in a bulk.

And I think similar to the answer in the past, I mean compared to the fourth quarter of last year, it was already starting to move to about 12% of the total transceiver business. The higher data rates now are…

We have a question from Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley.

A couple for me. One, if you could just kind of speak to, over the last 15, 18 months that you were kind of evaluating the Coherent acquisition. Just how your view of what cross-sell opportunities or synergy opportunities have been, are you more encouraged or kind of similarly encouraged as you were last March? And then, maybe second question. Giovanni, you had mentioned last quarter that you were expecting 3D sensing business to grow, not necessarily from your lead customer, but from other expansion opportunities during the year. Clearly, you’re seeing expansion within your lead customer as well. But just are the other opportunities that you were expecting in 3D sensing kind of playing out as expected? Thanks.

Okay. Meta, I’ll let Giovanni take the second part. As it relates to the first part of your question, compared to what we were thinking 18 months ago, with regard to opportunities for growth and the synergies, we were not able to -- until the acquisition closed, we were not able to see or be exposed to any aspect of the details of their revenues. In the last few weeks, now that we’ve had that chance, yes, I would say that we’re even more excited than what we were before then. The size of our largest customers and leading customers that are coming up in the marketplace who are investing to grow, they’re all on the list. And the next phase of the integration will actually be a complete overhaul of our global sales organization, bringing the sales and service organization together. That will happen here in the next few weeks. And when that happens, we will be able to we will be able to tie our efficient standard operating procedures and processes with legacy Coherent together in a way that we -- the way that we both like to do and hit the road and start talking to these large customers and the medium-sized ones that we’ve targeted to grow with. There’s a -- it’s a target-rich environment. I guess, that’s all I’d say.

So, I would say that the -- first of all, let me comment generally the growth trajectory in our case, it’s really -- it clearly comes down to three core coordinates that I want to make sure that I explained them. First of all, we are broadening our technology footprint in the sensing and 3D sensing market. So, in terms of actually the material that is being used to support those applications. That’s very important. So, in order to set that you do have to -- you obviously must have a broad portfolio of technology platforms to do that. That’s one coordinate. The second coordinate is the level of integration that we are offering. We’re partnering in some cases -- in some cases, directly we try to offer a broader level of integration with packaging, including drivers, which we design ourselves for lasers and those kinds of applications. So, that’s also important. And the other one, as I mentioned earlier is really around the expansion of the market that we are serving. So, we aren’t focusing only on 3D sensing, which we have demonstrated ability to be very cost and quality competitive in a market which is obviously very price sensitive. But, we’re expanding beyond that into sensing, which is a much larger market and where there is also -- I assume we see there is more competition. But because of our vertical integration, the product portfolio and the offering that it’s not limited to chips, but it goes beyond semiconductor laser chips, as I said earlier, into optics, into materials, into packaged components, so forth. We expect the growth to be driven in those three coordinates, as I said. So yes, one customer is definitely driving most of the growth. On the other hand, we’re having significant new play in automotive and life sciences coming with biometrics for wearables and the likes will eventually come. We’re very engaged in that -- for those kind of applications, too. And so, it’s a very much broader market than we talked about in the past. And so there is more room for growth than just in the 3D sensing, even if I think the 3D sensing we continue to gain share, as I said earlier.

Our next question comes from Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.

First of all, congratulations on the deal. Chuck, we’re hearing from a lot of companies that the supply issues are now starting to get better. So, I guess, my first question is you had a pretty big amount of revenue you left behind on the table last quarter. I would be curious to see what you’re seeing at this point in time if you agree with the statement that I just made that we’re hearing from other companies, or is it still pretty tight?

There are -- we had a big opportunity -- a bigger opportunity than what we could deliver in the fourth quarter. We talked about it. I mentioned it on my call -- in my part of the script. But for sure, I also said we are seeing some moderation, but it’s on a supplier by supplier, product line by product line basis, fab by fab basis. So, it’s not a comment that you can make as a broad brush across the whole of the market. The other aspect is that once this problem became clear, we got busy working on second sources and redesigning and re-spinning and re-everything that we needed to in close partnership with our customers. So, part of the supply chain moderation is actually coming as a result of artwork and the deliberate strategy to dual source or triple source where we may have been only sole or double source. So it’s a mix. And for sure, for sure we can see some improvements coming in some quarters, and in other parts, the challenges that we’re managing are about the same as they were 90 days ago.

Got it. Thanks, Chuck. And for my next one, I know we can look at Coherent’s model and sort of put together gross margin pro forma and OpEx number. But I’d be curious if you would be able to provide some color on how we should model those two, the gross margin and the OpEx number. And if there’s any difference, now that you’ve owned couple of -- I guess, a couple of weeks, any difference to what you expected? Anything pleasant or unpleasant that you saw from the deal?

First of all, the second part of the question, no. I mean, I think the more we work with our new colleagues, it just becomes more and more exciting. We’re very, very happy with the progress they’re making in the market and the financial progress that they’ve made on their own from their own internal plans, which doesn’t always happen in an acquisition, once a company knows it’s going to be acquired by somebody else. They sort of ignored that faction, got on with their plan, and they did a very wonderful job. I would expect that [Technical Difficulty] but that said, over the next couple of weeks, we’ll probably put out the combined backward model, first of all, and then you’ll be able to see it from there. But I’d say generally speaking, company is still expecting to have the margins in the 40s. I would expect that you should probably not do much above 40 at this point until we’ve really had some time to look at all the ways they report. And various things that they’re seeing also on supply chain at this point, too. That’s the first thing. With respect to OpEx, we will continue to work on the combined OpEx between the two companies, similar to as we have been doing. And the synergies, as we said, are very, very important to where we’re going to be here. And I think conceptually, it’s probably the same situation we have with Finisar, which is we’ll say that we’re going to try and get their numbers to the II-VI numbers, 20% of revenue for OpEx, et cetera. At the end of the three years of synergies, and I imagine we would probably do that somewhat faster. So, my general sense is that it’s very likely that we will continue to make the same sort of progress we have with II-VI. So generally speaking, we will make progress on not just taking the two companies and adding them up between the synergies. And I think the work that we’ll be able to do together in leveraging both companies’ sets of assets.

We have a question from Sidney Ho with Deutsche Bank.

Two quick ones, one on silicon carbide. For the Infineon deal specifically, is there any way you can help us think about the size of the contract, the duration, the timing of the revenue ramp? And also curious if there is any commitment of time line to deliver 200-millimeter wafers. And I have a follow-up. Thanks.

Okay. Thank you, Sidney. We will not be able to say any more than what Infineon and we released in our press release. But I could add that in terms of the time line, the time line is now. So, it’s now. People are in need. We’re ready. It’s now. So, we’re in the process of serving them. And as it relates to 200-millimeter, well, as we have announced, in 2016, we came to the marketplace with the first 200-millimeter silicon carbide capability. We are ready, and we are serving it. My view is that the 150-millimeter will continue to be the dominant substrate for silicon carbide for some time to come.

Maybe a follow-up question is kind of related to this. But if you look at the fiscal ‘23 CapEx guidance, $500 million to $600 million is up quite a bit. Obviously, you have Coherent in there. But I’m curious how -- what are the different components in terms of the increase? How much of that is coming from silicon carbide extension? And how much of that is coming from Coherent and other items?

So Coherent probably adds in the neighborhood of between say $70 million to $90 million, maybe $100 million, depending on what they see in terms of new opportunities. So that’s the first part of the answer. And then the second part of the answer is, we would expect to see silicon carbide continue in 2024 very, very -- 2023 very, very similar to what we saw in 2022. Of the $1 billion of investment that we discussed coming over the next 10 years, actually, it’s rather concentrated in the first three as opposed to CapEx.

We have a question from Thomas O’Malley with Barclays. Thomas O’Malley: You gave some guidance in terms of organic II-VI sequentially. And with that guidance, it implies Coherent kind of flat to slightly down. Could you just talk about what’s going better, what’s going worse than Coherent? Is it the industrial laser side? You guys have seen some strength there despite the weakness in China or is it on the OLED side, where it’s the microelectronics? Any color on the moving parts, what’s doing better, what’s doing worse there? Thank you.

I would say, it’s very, very steady. And actually, there is nothing going at works. You already heard Coherent’s comments last quarter about supply chain. So actually, they’re delivering very steady performance, all things considered. Thomas O’Malley: Helpful. And then, in terms of the CapEx, we heard a competitor talk earlier last week about their efforts to start going after DSP technology. Could you just give us an update on how that effort is going for you guys? And the strategic importance of having a DSP in both the Coherent market at higher speeds in the future? Thank you.

Good morning. Thanks for the question. Well, as I said in my prepared remarks, we started investing in 2019, three years ago. We realized the strategic importance of the ability to design our own DSPs. And we started -- we introduced dedicated DSP, as I said, for the 100G update or 10G Ethernet links, but particularly around the backhaul -- wireless backhaul and so forth is, as I said, almost like millions of ports that need to be upgraded from 10G to 100G, and that DSP is going to give us an incredibly competitive cost structure in addition, of course, to the lasers and detectors and the vertically integrated manufacturing lines that we have in China and Malaysia. So, that DSP investment is continuing. We’re obviously working on other functionalities, other reaches, other applications. And we will continue to beef up the team with talent to continue to support, particularly the Coherent side of the transceiver demand, where we’ll need to broaden the portfolio beyond what we already announced. So anyway -- so as I said, we recognized the importance, we decided to go with an organic investment and so far has been delivering according to plan, and we’re very excited about it.

I would add that our current supply chain partners have really done a great job for us at the same time. So, we have this dual approach here because we’re thinking about the future.

Thank you. And that’s all the questions we have. I’d like to turn the call back to management for any closing remarks.

I want to thank all of you for being with us today. We hope you have a good day, and we look forward to seeing you in the future. See you soon. Bye, bye.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.