Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Corpay Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note, this call is being recorded, and I will be standing by should you need any assistance. It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Jim Eglseder, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today for our earnings call to discuss third quarter 2025 results. With me today are Ron Clarke, our Chairman and CEO; and Peter Walker, our CFO. Our earnings release and supplemental materials for the quarter are available on the Investor Relations section of corpay.com. Please refer to these materials for an explanation of the non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call, along with a reconciliation of those measures to the nearest applicable GAAP measures. Our remarks today will include forward-looking statements about expected operating and financial results, strategic initiatives, acquisitions and synergies and potential divestitures, among other matters. Forward-looking statements may differ materially from actual results and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Some of those risks are mentioned in today's press release on Form 8-K and can also be found in our annual report on Form 10-K. These documents are available on our website and at sec.gov. Now I'll turn the call over to Ron Clarke, our Chairman and CEO. Ron?

Okay, Jim, thanks. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining our Q3 2025 earnings call. Upfront here, I'll plan to cover 3 subjects. So first, provide my view on Q3 results, our Q4 outlook and an early 2026 preview. Second, I want to spotlight our Corporate Payments business and emphasize really the sheer size of that opportunity. And then lastly, I'll provide a progress report on our recent M&A and stablecoin activities. Okay. Let me begin with our Q3 results, which were really quite good across the board. We reported both revenue and cash EPS growth of 14% in the quarter. Our overall organic revenue growth finished up 11%. Particularly pleased there that higher volume and higher spend is driving the organic growth, so durable. Inside of the overall organic revenue growth, our Vehicle Payments segment grew 10%. And inside of that, our U.S. Vehicle Payment segment accelerated to 5%. So delighted, obviously, to see our Vehicle segment back to 10% organic growth. Our Corporate Payments segment grew 17% in the quarter, and that's inclusive of a point of flow compression. Q3 trends continuing quite strong. Retention improved slightly to 92.4%. Our sales or new bookings grew 24% in the quarter, happy with that. And our same-store sales remained essentially flat. Our lodging business remained weak in Q3. It was mostly impacted by lower emergency or onetime revenues. Fortunately, the attrition in the business improved, so from minus 8% last year to minus 5% this quarter, and the client base softness improved from minus 2% to plus 2% this quarter. So for sure, the business is stabilizing. Now we just need to sell more. So look, in summary, very pleased with the quarter. It's clean. All of the businesses finished in line or better than our expectation. And our 2…

Thanks, Ron, and good afternoon, everyone. Let's start with highlights of the quarter. Q3 revenue was $1.172 billion, overperforming the midpoint of our guidance range. Print revenue grew 14% year-over-year, driven by 11% organic revenue growth. Q3 adjusted EPS of $5.70 per share overperformed the midpoint of our range and grew 14% year-over-year due to strong top line performance and solid expense management. Adjusted EPS grew 17% year-over-year on a constant macro basis. The headline for the quarter is mid-teens top and bottom line growth, excellent organic growth with 10% vehicle payments organic growth driven by our U.S. vehicle payments business returning to mid-single-digit organic growth, continued strong retention, all while maintaining strong margins. We've also produced significant sales growth this year that will fuel our business over the balance of 2025 and into 2026. Now turning to our segment performance and the underlying drivers of our organic revenue growth. Corporate Payments delivered 17% organic growth for the quarter despite 100 basis points drag from float revenue compression due to lower interest rates. Overall, the performance was driven by growth in spend volumes, which increased 57% on a reported basis and up 38% organically. Spend volume was just over $68 billion in Q3, which puts us on pace to be north of $250 billion annually on a run rate basis. Corporate Payments revenue per spend volume decreased year-over-year due to new payables and cross-border enterprise clients. The payables business continues to perform, driven by strong execution on Paymerang synergies and solid progress implementing and ramping new full AP customers. We continue to be optimistic about the future of the business and are laser-focused on customer acquisition. Cross-border continued to deliver strong sales in Q3. Both new client acquisition and recurring client transaction activity was robust as our scale, technology and…

[Operator Instructions]. We'll take our first question from John Davis with Raymond James.

Peter, maybe just first on Corporate Payments organic growth. I think you guys said mid-teens despite an incremental float headwind. Obviously, you have a very tough comp from the year ago quarter. So maybe just talk about the drivers that give you confidence in that organic growth outlook for the fourth quarter, specifically in Corporate Payments.

John, I appreciate the question. So maybe we'll just break it down into the components because what Ron shared in his script was obviously with the Alpha acquisition. So if we look at the core Corporate Payments business, we're expecting that to be, call it, 16-ish percent with a drag of 100 basis points from float. So about a 17% growth rate there in the core business. That does compare to last year, which was 26%, which was obviously kind of had a double impact. We had a one-timer in there of about 400 basis points, and we are growing off of a really weak Q4 '23. So hopefully, that gives some context in terms of kind of the core business. When we think about Alpha, Alpha's organic growth is coming in at 13%, but ex float, that would be 31%. So obviously, the business is very dependent on float from the bank account business. And then on a consolidated basis, that gets us to the mid-teens that Ron spoke about with a 3% float headwind. So call that without the headwind, 18%-ish.

John, it's Ron. Remember, we've also seen October.

Fair enough. Fair enough. All right. So I'll continue on the guidance here. Ron, as you think about next year, you guys have consistently said 10% organic. You're guiding to that next year. There's a little bit of a choppy macro backdrop. You saw some nice acceleration in North America fleet in the quarter. Obviously, Corporate Payments is strong. Maybe just talk about what gives you confidence? And what, if any, of that organic growth outlook next year comes from synergies from Paymerang and some other of the prior corporate payments deal that now will flow through to organic growth.

Yes. I think, John, it's just run rate, right? We've got the trends. We see what we're adding new business. We see what the losses are running. And so I think our confidence of having the vehicle business high single digits to 10% in the Corporate Payments business call it, mid-teens, inclusive of the flow headwinds that we're super comfortable. And even the other category, which historically was a bit problematic, we're outlooking that thing to be kind of 10% plus. So the wildcard, I guess, is lodging, which we think will edge over into positive territory. So I think we -- what we're seeing, I mean, look at the quarter, right, that we just printed and look what we're giving for Q4. So I think we're just -- we're seeing it and really not calling for anything super different than what we're kind of running at. So pretty confident.

We will move next with Sanjay Sakhrani with KBW.

Maybe just to follow on some of the questions asked before. Obviously, next year is setting up pretty strong. You've got this Mastercard investment and then some of the pipeline that's building associated with that partnership, the synergies from Alpha. Could you just talk, Ron, a little bit of how you're figuring for that in that preliminary outlook?

What do you mean, Sanjay? How we're figuring it.

Like how much of that is driving sort of the preliminary view on revenue growth for next year?

Yes. I'd say not a lot. I think I said before that we were hoping that Mastercard thing could add 1 point or 2 that FI channel to our cross-border business, which is already kind of a mid-high teens number. The synergies, again, the Alpha business is, call it, circa $300 million-ish in U.S. and it's got a bit of a flow headwind. So I'd say, again, 0.5 point maybe from that. So the majority really of the outlook is around just the core set of businesses. I do think we're going to get profit leverage, though, separate from revenue from Alpha from the macro, right, that we're seeing and from some of this cost efficiency, some of the AI work that we've done. So I do see us getting some incremental profit leverage next year kind of above normal levels.

Got it. Okay. And then, Peter, could you just drill down just a little bit more on that breakdown that you had. So if I think about the fourth quarter revenue outlook, how much does Alpha specifically add to that? And then on that $0.75 of upside for next year, like how much of it is Alpha versus Avid?

Yes. So on the revenue outlook for Q4 '25, Alpha is adding about $55 million of revenue in the fourth quarter. And in terms of the $0.75, we've not given that breakout, but we obviously previously shared that Alpha would be $0.50. So you can kind of take those 2 and give that some thought in terms of your split there.

Our next question comes from Tien-Tsin Huang with JPMorgan.

Just wanted to ask on '26 again. Just thinking about the segments and the growth and how growth might be different than what we saw in '25 at a high level, any interesting call-outs there? You've got the new sales performance up 20-plus percent. Retention is a little bit better. I know the deals are getting layered in. But just at a high level, how is '26 going to be different than '25?

Tien-Tsin, it's Ron. It's good to hear your voice. I'd say it's really more of the same, right, than different. I think what's different is a little bit happier on the vehicle, right, that thing accelerated second half or will we think to 10% from whatever it was 8%, 9% in the first half. So we think that's going to kind of carry through. So we think that will do a little bit better. Lodging, again, a wildcard call that thing a push. The other category, maybe a tad lighter but still positive kind of double digits. So really, the question is where in the teens will the corporate payment business inclusive of the float land. So that would be, I'd say, what could cause the thing to be a little bit better. But more of the same really, Tien-Tsin, to the '25 numbers, I'd say, next year.

And my quick follow-up, just thinking about -- I mean you have a lot on your plate thinking about, again, the acquisitions, divestitures. I'm sure there are other deals in the pipe as well. Just think about Ron, does it feel tougher to sort of regenerate some of the sales performance that you've seen? Just curious where you see opportunity versus risk going into the end of the year here and going into next year.

Yes. I mean I think the sales performance, Tien-Tsin, is quite good. The preliminary plan that we're building is way increasing. We hired someone new to start to build up some new channels like the Zoom channel has been super small. We're building that channel for kind of midsize is working. So I see us pouring a bunch more money some of it from the expense savings that we're getting and sales will be up well over 20% this year in 2025. We got a bunch of elephants, right, that help this year. So I think bullish on it. I think the way upside for us is really in capital allocation. If people keep trading our stock at this level, and we sell these companies, we are going to be buying stock back, which obviously at this kind of a price would be pretty incremental. We have this Mastercard money coming in. So we have some sources of incremental capital, again, above kind of normal levels that could help us next year. So I'm pretty bullish on the profit side really for next year.

Our next question comes from Andrew Jeffrey with William Blair.

Appreciate taking the question. Pretty exciting times in corporate payments, obviously. Ron, I'm intrigued by the stablecoin commentary because I know there's been a lot of discussion in the market, both sort of pro and con. I wonder if you could just sort of frame up for me what you think the long-term opportunity is in that business? It sounds like initially, it's going to be infrastructure, so on-ramp, off-ramp. Over time, does the Circle agreement sort of create the opportunity for cross-border stablecoin movement? It sounds like maybe you're doing that a little bit today in the FX business, but I'm thinking like cross-border B2B payments. And what do you think the time frame on something like that is, assuming that's a business in which you have your eye at this point?

Yes. We tried to lay out, Andrew, in the supplement, I think Jim was Page 18 or something. But to me, Andrew, the stablecoin thing is kind of -- it's a 2-part thing. So one is kind of the new players, right, that have big crypto balances like Circle, Ripple, this bank, I mentioned the bank brick, where we can be helpful to them. Effectively, they're both providers of capabilities to us, but potentially clients of ours, right, again, that need to route dollars back, right, in USD to investors. So that's opportunity, one, is just to be a provider back to some of these guys that have big balances. But to me, the fascinating one will be we've got a big business, right? We pay hundreds of billions to the U.S. merchants, both on our domestic business and our cross-border business, they're huge beneficiaries of payouts of ours. And so to me, the fascinating question is, what will the take rate be? So if we go to those biggest concentrated beneficiaries and say to them, "Hey, we'll enable you with a stablecoin wallet. Do you want us to basically have funds come in there if they're off cycle or not." And then you can toggle it back and forth between your traditional bank accounts or we have a big bank account business. I think we said 7,000 bank accounts with $3 billion in deposits, same thing. When we tell those institutional clients, we're attaching a stablecoin wallet, will they use it? And so I think we'll learn a lot there because we have flows and we have deposits unlike people who are trying to get into this business. And so I think we're going to get a super early read of the interest on both sides, right, the deposit side and this payout side. So we're just readying those things and then seeing if the beneficiaries and the clients we have used them.

Okay. So it sounds like you'll sort of build the infrastructure and wait to see how the market evolves. Would that be the right way to think about it?

Yes, Yes. I mean if you think of what's happening, like it's kind of third-tier world driving a lot of the things, right? There's not a ton of activity kind of in the G20 space where our -- all of our bulk is. So I think we're going to be there. We're adding this set of capabilities, particularly the wallets. We have these flows, and we're going to make our clients aware of them and see what the take rate is to see whether there's utilization or not. But we're excited that there probably will be. I personally think this off-cycle piece, Andrew, is the magic being able to basically take funds when the banking system is closed, I think, might be the most interesting piece, but I guess we'll see. The thing I want to say is we're not afraid. I mean I don't -- I think some people think like we're afraid. We're not afraid. We think it's a fascinating incremental rail. We're going to offer it, and we think -- we hope that our clients are going to take some advantage of it.

Yes, I suspect they will. I suspect you're right. And if I could ask one more, maybe, Peter, the yield on these big enterprise clients, I guess, I mean, if investors ask, can you kind of frame up how you're thinking about that business? I imagine it's high incremental margin and you like the volume. Is there anything you'd add to that when we think about sort of the yield on those big customers versus the core business?

Andrew, it's Ron. I'll take that one. I think it's quite wide, right? As we said in our cross-border business, historically, we'd be in the, call it, average of 50 to 60 basis points kind of keep on conversion work. We have some of these gigantic super large transactions that could be single-digit basis points, so 16, 17 of the line average and stuff. And we often do it in concert with the normal business with those big accounts. So we might have a big account where we're doing some set of ongoing kind of mass payments at a decent kind of rate and then, hey, they call us for some kind of significant one-off kind of transaction. So it's oftentimes done that way where the account calls us for some other kind of use. And your point, although it's a way different rate, it's a gigantic trade, and we're happy to kind of take it to your point, from a profit perspective, it's quite high, the absolute dollars of the profit because it's one big transaction, there's not a lot of work. We're really calling out mostly so people don't think that the core or normalized rate in that business is moving at all. It's really going nowhere if you look at it without this handful of accounts.

Our next question comes from Darrin Peller with Wolfe Research.

Ron, can you just give us a quick update on the progress and any details you can provide about the interest level and some of the divestitures you were looking for -- looking to make over the next several quarters or so?

Yes. Darrin, I'd say mostly it's early days. Kind of the books are out, the fireside chats have started. We've obviously had some call-ins on the businesses. So I'd say it'd be premature to say we know a lot. The one thing I would say is these are decent businesses. These are a couple of businesses that are in our International vehicle segment that are growing, both of them grow kind of 10%-ish. So they're decent businesses and they're profitable. So they will sell. The question is, are we going to like the price. So unlike the gift thing that I know you weathered through with us, however many times we try that. These will transact. The question is whether we're going to like the price enough. But we will know. We've got a process set up where first bids are due in the next few weeks here. So by the time we talk again, we'll have a clear answer for you.

All right. That's good to hear and helpful. I guess my quick follow-up would be on U.S. fleet growth. I think we saw 5% you mentioned. And just touch a little bit more on the sustainability of that just because it obviously is good to see. I'm curious what's driving it and then your conviction around it going forward.

Yes. That's a super good question. I think the main thing is the structure of that business has changed a lot kind of since the pivot. So call our Vehicle segment there a $2 billion business annually, kind of 1/3 in the U.S., 1/3 in Europe and 1/3 in Brazil, ballpark. So let's just use $700 million as a ballpark number. The retention in that business now has gotten to the company's line average. So historically, when it was a micro business, losses were super high. So think now if you were modeling this with me, hey, I got a $700 million business printing in 2025 and our line average is, call it, 92%, 93%, so the loss rate is 7. So you lose 7 on $700 million, you lose $50 million. We actually are planning the same-store sales that are improving. They're going to go positive in that business next year. So you're into a way lower risk profile now. We don't need to sell very much or add too many initiatives to get the thing to work. Whereas before, we had the bottom of the bucket, the loss rates were almost double that at some point and the same-store sales were 2 and 3 points negative. So that's the main headline for everybody is the assignment to grow it now is just infinitely easier than it was a couple of years ago.

Way easier to get a number.

Our next question comes from Nate Svensson with Deutsche Bank.

Nice results. I did want to ask on Avid now that that's closed and nice to hear that it's contributing at least some portion of the $0.75 accretion next year. I guess, first, just any update on the work being done at Avid to help improve their margin profile and growth and kind of the role that Corpay is playing there? And then I guess more specifically, since the deal closed, any way to quantify the impact from Avid volumes maybe coming on? I think a competitor may have called out a loss, but wondering if you can size the impact there maybe in terms of volumes.

Well, the first thing I'm going to say, Nate, is thank you. That was a good opener, nice results. We kind of appreciate that. On your first question of what are we doing? I feel like the relationship is super good. We've obviously -- I've known Mike who runs the place for quite a while and a bunch of his management team, and we like, which is why we did the deal, the TPG guys. So the first thing I'd say is the 3 groups, us, the Avid guys and TPG guys have been kind of on this together, point one. Point two is it's super clear, like the handful of things to do to dramatically improve profit performance there is clear. And Mike has already pulled the trigger really by the time we're on this call, getting rid of a bunch of costs already. So I'd say that we're aligned on it. We will get the profits way up, which is why we're comfortable with some accretion next year. The million-dollar question is really the growth rate. Can we -- can Mike get that business close to the kind of parity with what we do, kind of a mid-teens or mid-teens plus kind of grower. So I'd say, Nate, that that's mostly what we're focused on now is what can they do on the buyer sales side and on the monetization side to get the revenue acceleration. And as I said, if we get that, if that company gets that, we will buy the balance of the business and consolidate it.

Yes, makes sense. I appreciate the detail. I do want to ask on the gift card business and other. I know there's some lumpiness and there were some regulatory changes that may have shifted demand from certain parts of the year to others. So I think it would be helpful just to kind of like walk through the changes in that business, where the pull -- how much the pull forward was. And then I think you said kind of returning to double-digit growth. So just making sure your confidence in your visibility and getting back to double-digit growth in a business that can be lumpy historically, that would be helpful.

Yes, that's a super good question. So one of the world's worst businesses, right, some number of years ago, 3, 4 years ago and now a good business, a growing business, both this year and next. So kind of what's going on. It's really 3 things, Nate. So one is this fraud packaging thing. So a couple of states have said, hey, we're sick of people going in and stealing these gift cards and coming back in and grouping up consumers to buy it and find out there's no money. They paid for the card and there's no money on the card. So look, new suppliers are going to stop that. You're going to create packaging that doesn't allow people to do that. So that packaging has been created, and we've recycled some of that new packaging among some of our clients. So it created a bit of a lift, maybe, I don't know, 5 points -- 3 to 5 points this year above normal kind of card fulfillment as people kind of reinventory with this fraud protection stuff. But the 2 other things are we're just selling, like I don't know if other folks that do this business have gotten sleepy or whatever, but we are way winning more new accounts and onboarding those. I'm telling you like 5, 6 new accounts this year, another at least 4 or 5 that we're close to closing now that will come online next year. So way more new business the last couple of years. And then lastly, these new add-ons that I think I've spoken of like, hey, we'll help a gift card client sell cards. So we went into the business of helping manage their website and do the fulfillment. So we get paid not only for administering their gift cards, but actually helping them sell the cards. We also figured out a way to stick the cards, these proprietary cards into the wallet. So they sort of like a marketing thing for people where you stick your Dick's Sporting Goods card in your wallet, you see it every time you go to your wallet. So we're getting paid more money from our clients for like doing additional things. So when you put those 2, 3 things together, it's like it's just turned into like it's a good business and our confidence that it will be double digit again in '26, I'd say, is pretty high.

I guess just to clarify, that 3- to 5-point uplift you mentioned above normal card fulfillment, is that a pull forward from '26? Or is there a change in inventories? Or am I thinking about that the wrong way?

No, I would say it's the incremental 2025 growth. Like if they hadn't had this thing, I'd say the full year '25 gift card might be 2, 3 points lower than what we'll print. I don't think it will have much different impact. We know everything about the legislation and stuff. So we built that into the guide already for '26. It's mostly these 2 new things that are creating the lift to get the thing in the double digits.

We will move next with Mihir Bhatia with Bank of America.

Let me also add nice results here. Maybe to just -- I want to go back to the monetization rate discussion a little bit in the Corporate Payments segment. I guess just trying to understand, was there anything unusual in 3Q in terms of the number of large transactions or onboarding some of these enterprise accounts? What I'm really trying to understand is, should we expect the monetization to increase back like the monetization rate to bounce back up in 4Q? Or have you unlocked something where you're just going to be doing more of these volumes and you've signed some of these big enterprise accounts. So it's more of a volume story than a monetization story?

Yes. I would say don't read that as abnormal. We probably will do a bit more of this. The reason we want to break it out is to make sure people are clear that when you take away these super large accounts and these super large transactions that the "normal book of business is still pricing basically in the same kind of range." And I'd say the same thing on the domestic payables business. If anything, that thing may inch up again next year as we offer some incremental ways. We've increased kind of pay for ACH via an acquisition, we're introducing a debit card as a way to get paid versus just a virtual card. So I would say that, if anything, the monetization rates and these big onetime things will probably inch up a bit in '26.

Got it. That is helpful. And then maybe just thinking about '26 broadly, you've laid out some pretty interesting upside or optionality in corporate payments, whether it's from the Mastercard of just selling more. And then similarly on U.S. vehicle payments, you were talking about the turnaround being there and being the sales increasing. Lodging, it sounds like it's stabilized and likely heading better. So I guess I'm asking, where is the risk? And could that 9% to 11% growth actually look closer to 11% to 13% or something like that?

I think that's a super great follow-up. I guess the headline, the first comment is we just have a better business today. Like I just don't want people on the call to miss that sitting here in whatever November, like the business is just better. The 2 biggest businesses are growing and working and stuff. And so that would be the #1 thing. Across the areas, I'd say, again, the thing that probably has a chance to be better that would cause our number to get better if we got there would be in the corporate payment space. A bunch of these things that you called out like the Mastercard thing are new. We haven't actually booked a single sale yet, although we have a good pipeline. So I'd say the goal of this call, since we're still early days is to not get over our skis to kind of give you guys a number of what we're seeing, what the business is running at and provide some assurance we think we can get that number and then come back in 90 days when we finished our work and be a bit more precise. But I think the main thing is we've gotten to the second half acceleration that we said we would despite the skeptics, and we like that. And we just don't want people to miss that the step off, when we give you 570 and 590, you're good at math, that's higher than 21. So I say it all the time in recurring businesses, if your exit rate is a lot better than your entry rate, you already have part of the next year baked. It's really in your exit rate. So yes, I'd say our confidence of the business performance is pretty good.

Our next question comes from Rayna Kumar with Oppenheimer.

This is Abigail on for Rayna. So just a quick question about corporate payments kind of going off of the team for tonight. So the accounts payables represents a major TAM for corporate payments, particularly with the investment in Avid. Could you talk a little bit more about the progress you're making in convincing companies to switch from older accounts payable methods like such as paper checks, et cetera? And then what are some of like your biggest roadblocks that the sales force is facing to unlock more of this TAM? And then how do you guys like convince the companies to make that switch?

Abigail, it's Ron. That's a pretty good question. I guess this offering of going to a midsized company that's got a lot of ADP, it's literally a proposal that's too good to be true. You show up, knock, knock, meet the CFO, the head of ADP and you tell them, hey, look, I can digitize and derisk paying your ADP and give you money back. So when you finish saying that, I think people look at you and like, what do you mean? Well, like, what do you mean? What do we mean? We can take over all the invoicing you have. We've got way more scale to do it. We've got ways to derisk the electronic transfer of things and because we can monetize some of them, we can actually give you money back. So the pitch is super compelling. It's the inertia, I'd say, of getting in. So the close rate, the win rate is super high. If you can meet the CFO and the Head of ADP and tell them that we've got thousands of clients that we do this for, and it's pretty easy and you get money back and you transfer risk to us, it's a really super compelling pitch. The question is, can you get the meetings? Can you get people to make time to listen to it? That would be the question mark. And I think the more common, I worked at ADP before starting this company and everybody knows about payroll outsourcing, and I think less people know about ADP automation and workflow and payment ADP outsourcing. So I think as the category and the referenceability keeps getting wider that it will get easier. The world will be clear that this is a logical thing to do with non-payroll expense, right, which is almost half of a business' expense, right, payroll half and then this. So that's the bet that we have that as the clock keeps turning, more and more companies will become aware of the service.

We will move next with James Faucette with Morgan Stanley.

Ron, I want to follow up on questions around the -- around the stablecoins. I really appreciate all the work you guys are doing to build an infrastructure there. You made interesting comments about where you may see some utility. Just wondering if you can give more specific example. I think you mentioned you thought maybe there'd be some interest in things like after hours or weekend type transfers, et cetera. But have you seen any specific cases where, hey, that makes a lot of sense or at least you could imagine the kinds of transactions that you may be looking at?

Yes, James, it's a good question. I'd say it's pretty quiet. I'd say that most of the activity is with the crypto digital assets guys themselves, right, that people like us going to Circle and Ripple to get some capabilities and then them suggesting that they could be clients of ours. I'd say that's what's real today. We're actually getting paid doing work here in November. So on the other ones, I'd say, in terms of our flows and our deposits, I think there's not a lot of people standing up and shouting. I think as we make them more aware of what this after-hours utility case is, then we'll see would be my comment back. But I wouldn't say, again, among the major countries and major markets, which is where our flows are that we are hearing tons of people jumping up and down on it yet. But we're not waiting. We're just going to put the stuff in place and tell people about it and see if they find utility there.

Got it. And maybe I just -- once again, just following up on that one point is that you mentioned the G20 and not seeing a lot of activity there. Can you just talk about like why that might be or what would change that? Because I have heard that from others saying, hey, this is going to be more of an artifact for emerging market currencies, et cetera. But I guess I'd love to hear from your perspective, like if that's a permanent thing or just requires time and development.

Yes. I mean I do think if you look at the current business, I think that, that is what's driving it, that the ability in these third world emerging countries, I think, is where the volume is. And I think the rest of the volume is really just crypto, like Bitcoin and stuff like that and us helping those guys return money in USD to investors. So I think the stablecoin among big businesses in these major markets is still just early days where they're trying to figure out what is the use case that's beneficial. It's not like the current system is broken, right, and it doesn't work like we move hundreds of billions of dollars. So I think it's more just time for -- I think when I talk to people, they don't even understand what this is, James, literally. Like when I go through, hey, this is what. So that's what I'd say is there's more people writing and talking about it, I think, than using it. And so I'd say, just give it some time, and we're going to tell clients about it and deposit holders about it, and we'll report back of what their interest is. But the main message I'm trying to give is we're getting ready. And we're going to try to get our clients, beneficiaries and deposit holders ready, and then we'll report back of whether they're going to transact or not.

Our next question comes from Trevor Williams with Jefferies.

I wanted to ask another on '26. So within the 9% to 11% organic growth, Ron, it sounded like not much different than what we're seeing this year or at least in the second half. For Corporate Payments, can you be more specific on what you're assuming for the fully loaded growth rate there? And within that, how you're thinking about the puts and takes between float and then the revenue synergies from Alpha, if we can think about those 2 potentially netting each other out in fiscal '26?

Yes, Trevor, I think it's just too early days, which is why we're kind of giving a bit of a wide range like we're maybe halfway through the Alpha 2026 plan. I'm actually going there with our group next week to continue to work the thing and how hard we're going to press the synergies. We did mention the Mastercard thing, right? Again, we'll know more in 90 days as those appointments, the pipeline converts. We'll have a better view of whether that starts starting to convert. So I'd say that we're kind of staying a bit broad with it. Obviously, we want to see what the interest rate curves are, what happens there, right, in the next 90 days with the employment vows -- cause that thing to keep coming down. So look, we're confident that, that segment is going to grow, and I think it's a function of what we're going to invest. If we get more money out of some of this AI stuff, we may put more sales and marketing spend into the business. So I just ask you to be patient, and we'll kind of give you the details of those 3 or 4 pieces when we talk next time.

Okay. Fair enough. And then to piggyback on Alpha and the accretion, at least within the initial $0.50 when you had announced the deal, it seemed like there was a fair amount of conservatism embedded in that number. So maybe just within the accretion that you're baking in within the $0.75 in total with Avid, can you give us some more specifics on what the obvious easy early synergies are from Alpha and then maybe beyond that, what you -- at least today, what you feel confident in being able to realize eventually, but maybe you don't have it in the numbers, at least initially, that would be helpful.

Yes. I would say we've given the number in early days, we're highly -- I would say we're highly confident that we can get at least that number. And so I'd say a couple of things. One, that in this case, in the Alpha case, we have both kinds of synergies. We have both revenue synergies and expense synergies. In some of the other businesses, we've had more on the cost side. And then second, I'd say that half or more of the synergies are just -- they're free to us. They're just super easy to get like we have contracts where we get better rates on holding deposits than they do or they have accounts that use their product in geographies that they're not licensed in, but we are. Obviously, they have a public company cost structure that will be gone and stuff. So I'd say that half or more, Trevor, of the first cut of the synergies are just sitting on the tee for us, which enable us to pay the price. And the purpose of the next 90 days is really to work the other half to really see where can we take that number. And by the time we talk again, we'll have an answer for you. But it will be quite accretive.

Our next question comes from Dave Koning with Baird.

Good job. Capital return question, really getting back kind of to the last question. Is the $0.75, is that fully self-funding, meaning the profits are fully covering the interest expense of what you're borrowing and you can use all your cash flow to do capital return over the next year. Just want to make sure I understand that how the accretion was looked at.

Yes. Dave, the answer, yes.

Good. And then just a quick follow-up -- go ahead.

I want to make sure you're clear, yes, just the way you said it, the answer is yes.

Okay. I'm glad we're on the same page. A quick follow-up. Interest expense, Q4, $115 million, $120 million, something in that range, up just a tick next year per quarter just because we'll have a full quarter of the borrowing from -- since you're into the quarter already when you bought Alpha. But just -- is that the way to think about it using a little higher than $115 million to $120 million per quarter?

Peter, you got that one?

Yes. I think it's a fair way to think about it.

And we will move next with Ken Suchoski with Autonomous Research.

Maybe just on U.S. Vehicle, the acceleration there. I think you called out higher approval rates as one of the drivers. Can you just comment on what you're seeing in terms of new acquisition and where that's coming from? It sounds like you're comfortable with the credit trends that you're seeing if you're approving more customers there.

Yes. Ken, it's Ron. That's right. The growth of that business, as I said, starts really with a complete change in the retention and same-store sales setup, which again makes it much easier to grow. But look, on the sales side, we have a bunch of elephants that we booked that created the second half acceleration. We've obviously got some more in the pipeline. I think the focus, the pivot that we made from the micro digital world is just better credit quality. And so as we've kind of retweaked our models and we look at our losses and what our receivables look like, we're approving just higher amounts. So what we're selling, we're basically getting more into the revenue line. We also have some other kind of rate initiatives around the merchant side. We have these big proprietary networks, including cardlock. So our tech now is -- enables us to move some of the volume that was on kind of lower interchange rails to higher. So we'll basically get some merchant rate enhancement by having some of our volume flow to different areas. So we've got a lot of things working. The base is just more solid. We've made some big sales. The approval rate credit quality is better on new accounts. We're moving volume to higher interchange, things like there's 3 or 4 things that are making the thing work, and we think it's durable into next year.

And then maybe just -- sorry, go ahead.

You're breaking up a little.

Sorry about that. Just on the margins for next year, I mean, lots of moving parts with acquisitions and efficiencies. Just how are you thinking about margins? I think I saw the comment on expecting incremental margin expansion from some initiatives.

Yes. As we mentioned, we've got some AI initiatives that are paying off well, some vendor rationalization initiatives, et cetera. So we do think there'll be incremental margin improvement next year, and we'll give more details on that when we get together in 90 days.

Ken, it's Ron. I also think it's a function of what we decide to -- in that, I think I tell you guys, a big part of our growth planning is what we agreed to spend in sales and marketing. So to Peter's point, that's going to be one of the calls we make is how much do we deliver in profitability in '26? And can we productively spend a bit more in some of the businesses to get it up and go in the forward year. So that's another call that we'll make. So I don't want to get again out over the skis. We may decide to spend some of that if we think we can get a good return on it.

This does conclude our Q&A session as well as the Corpay Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Thank you for your participation, and you may disconnect at any time.