Tony Thene
Analyst · The Benchmark Company. Please go ahead.
Well, we've heard that as that was, I thought, I did a question on this, Josh. And if you let me kind of go on for a little bit to kind of put all that in context and then come back to your question. I spent some time, last night, and I was thinking about what we've really said over the last couple of quarters, and as you well know, you were there, this all started in May of 2023 when we had our Investor Day, right where we said we were going to double operating income FY '19 versus FY '27, which is one of our most profitable years by the way, 40% CAGR from '23 to '27. As you mentioned, we said it wasn't going to be back-end loaded. It was going to have a meaningful cash generation and we didn't need to make any large scale capital expenditures for capacity or M&A to get there. We come out with the fourth quarter, and we actually exceed our target of getting into FY '19 run rate profitability. So, that's a big, that's a big checkmarks. During that fourth quarter so, about three months ago, we said that this first quarter was going to be slightly down to flat and it was going to, you know bust through the normal seasonality where you see the first quarter being sequentially down. And as you all know, we had a lot of people doubt us and say that you couldn't do that. Well, we actually exceeded that number. And now we come in and say that the second quarter is going to be another impressive quarter, just like Q1 even though we'll continue to do our planned maintenance even though its got two major holidays in there, we're still going to operate at that level. And then, what you're getting to the new piece of information that we came out with today. We said that even after those two quarters, put those together and we're going to do another 28% to 35% on top of that, it's, it's very impressive growth and that's why we took the time Josh to talk to you about that some of these work centers are still not running at the rates that we know they can run at. That's how we have line of sight to that second half. Again, we said, it wasn't going to be back-end loaded, but we never said that we were going to get 50% in year one or four. And I think your question is that, that's an awfully strong comment, we've heard -- now does that mean that years two, three and four could be even more and is there some conservatism put in there. You might have a point, maybe there probably, there probably is a little conservatism in there and we have the ability to even push that higher.