Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to City Union Bank 3Q FY '23 Results Conference Call hosted by AMBIT Capital. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Prabal Gandhi from AMBIT Capital. Thank you and over to you, sir.

Thank you, Tanvi. Good evening, everyone. On behalf of AMBIT Capital, I once again welcome you all for 3Q earnings call of City Union Bank. We have with us Mr. N Kamakodi, MD and CEO; and Mr. V. Ramesh, CFO. And without further ado, I'll hand over the call to Mr. N. Kamakodi for his opening remarks. Post which, we can open the floor for Q&A. Thank you and over to you, sir.

Good evening, everyone. Hearty welcome to all of you for this con call to discuss unaudited financial results for City Union Bank for the third quarter ended 31st December 2022. Board approved the results today and I assume you all have received the copies of the results and the presentation. Before going to our business performance, I would like to discuss 2 things about which we had received multiple calls from the investor and analyst community. First on the recent RBI inspection report and divergence of NPA for financial year 2021. You may be aware that we had to report similar divergence, which happened in 2016-'17. After that, there was no instance of divergence that needed disclosure till 2021. Even the inspection report of our bank, which was obtained through RTI and made public recently, also revealed the divergence was well below the tolerance level. So we had our last RBI inspection on financial year '19, after which there was no on-site inspection by RBI for financial year '20 and financial year '21. RBI vide their circular dated 14th September 2020 issued notification to the banks to migrate to live marking upgradation of NPA accounts on daily basis starting from July '21. We have moved to live marking live upgradation of nonperforming assets within the stipulated time period as prescribed by the RBI. Since our NPA marking was automated, we had not expected much divergence. But in the recent inspection conducted by RBI pertaining to financial year 2022, there were few cases of divergence which was identified and all the cases identified as divergence by RBI was not just because of 90 days overdue, but because of various interpretation issues about which I may be giving you some details. The divergence in additional gross NPA for the said financial year…

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Prakhar Agarwal from Elara Capital.

Just 3 questions from my end. First, when you talked about 12% to 15% growth and probably -- sorry, 15% to 18% growth and falling short this year, what would be in your sense the target for next year and what should ideally be industry growth for you to achieve that target? This is my first question.

Please repeat the question and ask one by one. First question, please.

So I'm saying, sir, when you talked about falling short of 15% to 18% growth target that you set for this year. For next year, what is ideally our growth target and to achieve that growth target, what is essentially industry growth that you're probably foreseeing for next year financial year FY '24?

See, I will be able to answer this question more clearly along with my next quarter results. There are few assumptions, which needs to get firmed up. So to see for example overall growth rate of the system to around -- see the 1 item which many of us are not able to understand properly is you can't push for the advance of growth without corresponding increase in the deposit side to run -- have a stable banking system. There are definitely issues with the overall growth and deposit growth and if you try to push for the growth at this point of time without corresponding deposit growth in the system, so you will hit -- nobody will be able to achieve -- the systemic growth, there will be disparity and creating issues. So we are very clear it has to be balanced. So I will be in a position to give about my -- even though I have another INR 3,000 crores worth of -- I can go for growth without going for additional deposits, I will be using it only when the deposit growth is also at the side. So I will be in a position to answer your question in a more precise manner along with the Q4 results because anything I give you now -- because for example when I gave 15% to 18% growth, I clearly said I was expecting the investment cycle to pick up from the month of December. Even in the -- and 1 of the triggers for seeing the investment growth to pick up is your overall capacity utilization to touch 85%. So there is a clear cut 10% gap and currently you are just closer to the pre-COVID number. And any prediction without having these firm answers, it is not going to take us anywhere. So let us wait for the fourth quarter to make that number. But what I can clearly say is that I will be having a growth rate -- my expectation is that it will definitely be in double digits should not be lower than the current growth rate whatever we are seeing. But more precise number we should be in a position to see it around the same -- along with our fourth quarter results.

Sure, sir. Sir, second question in terms of the lending yields and probably interest rate movement. So if I were to exclude the current rate hike, which has been taken in terms of repo, before that there were around 225 basis points rise in the systemic rates. What sort of lending rate hike that you have seen in your customer base? So against this 225 basis points, how much have you been able to pass through your customers?

See, the overall taking apart from the gold loan side, we were able to take about 1% to 1.5% was what we were able to share and we are planning to go for another 25 basis point hike after the current RBI hike. The 0.25%, 25 basis point may take maybe 15 basis point, 20 basis point ultimately it may get the transformed to. So overall transmission could be around 50% to 60% of the increased rates.

Got it. And sir, the last question is on asset quality and some bit on clarification on what you said about INR 32 crores. So on asset quality even if I were to just knock off the INR 146 crores net impact that you talked about because of divergence, then also we are running on a higher end in terms of our guidance that we talked about plus the fact that we have also stated that in FY '24 as well we will probably move step towards our earlier pre-COVID run rate of around 2%. Why is that conservatism? Is that something from restructured pool anticipated and that's why you're probably assuming a cautious stance or how to read about it?

See, basically how it works is for example for the first 3 quarters taking out this what you call your incremental slippages, you might have seen the slippage for the first quarter for the financial year was INR 270 crore, INR 261 crore for the second quarter; and if you leave the RBI divergence mark, it is about INR 280 crores to INR 290 crores for the current quarter. And we have clearly told that we should be having around 2.5% for the current year. Apart from that divergence mark, the overall numbers are coming to our expectations. So as we have given in the past, going forward then it has to get reduced to 2% to 2.5% and then below 2%. As per our expectation, we should be getting closer to the pre-COVID level slippages towards the second half of the next year, after which it should stabilize. So I am assuming that pre-COVID level is the regular slippages so I'm keeping that and the trend is that incrementally the overall numbers are moderating. This is what we are expecting.

Sir, if I'm allowed, can I ask one last question if possible or shall I come back.

Go ahead.

One last thing, sir, on this INR 32 crores impact that you've probably spoken about and lack of paperwork that you essentially said. Sir, is there any lapses in process as to why this thing of INR 32 crores? Ideally we are having a larger portfolio, but then of this INR 32 crores alone, why is that the paper work and all this stuff has happened? Just wanted to get your sense.

Let me clearly give you that. See, basically what happens is that there are 2 things here. One, accepting that as the agricultural loan with proper end use; and number 2 is the scale of finance. So it has been clearly accepted that they are all agricultural loans and there is no questions raised about the end use itself is a big thing for us. This is point number one. Point number 2 is basically the calculations for some of them were basically like these things had not found their place into the system. So when particularly the small ticket loans of INR 1.5 crore to -- I mean INR 1.6 lakhs to INR 2 lakhs bucket so it was ensuring the end use itself was taken as the proof and it was a sufficient condition and there was capturing that in the paper with the calculation and including in the system did not happen. Subsequently, we in fact made a test case understanding of whether have we funded anything which is beyond the scale of finance and all. But when we went into the case and all, we are very much satisfied with ourselves for that. The problem is only in properly entering the scale of finance into the system to ensure that. But overall, our back of the envelope calculation says the funding whatever we had done is very well within the scale or finance that is stipulated. So there is a lapse in capturing that in the system. It has happened because the proper procedures were not -- I mean it was not anticipated in this thing, which are all the normal things and normally the audit happens at the branch level or the auditor verifies that, he finds that and he gives a certificate and it was going on for a long time. So it was capturing that in the system and doing a proper math in the paper which was missing is something which we have to improve and we have already started taking steps on that.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Renish Bhuva from ICICI Securities.

Sir, just 2 questions. One is on the steady-state ROI metric. So assuming the...

Renish, not able to hear you properly.

Sir, just a question. So one is on the steady-state ROA metric. So we have been always maintaining this 1.5% ROA all over this year. But now if one is to assume this ECL framework will be the new guidelines, would that impact our steady-state ROA assumption or we'll be able to compensate with any other line item in the P&L?

See, the INR 10 crore difference, our calculation shows it should not affect our ROA metrics because of the ECL.

Okay, sir. Sir, and secondly, this is just a clarification. So this quarter our staff cost is lower because we have not provided for the leave encashment. So any particular reason why we have not provided this quarter?

Because of the increase in the overall rate, the actuarial calculations came out saying that whatever we had provided during the first and second quarter itself is sufficient to take care of the third quarter also.

The next question is from the line of V.P. Rajesh from Banyan Capital Advisors.

My question is regarding the gold loan book that we have. So what kind of growth are you expecting in...

Not able to hear you properly.

Is it better now?

It is better, but it is breaking now and then.

Okay. My question is in the gold loan book, what kind of growth are you expecting in that book in fiscal year '24? And secondly, if you can just comment on the market environment. Are you gaining market share from some of the NBFCs or is it just there is a lot of stress in the system that's why people are coming to get the loan against gold?

See, the gold loan growth between December '21 to December '22 is about 25% growth. Overall, currently 25% of our total loan portfolio is gold loan, which was 21% during the same period last year. So we had about INR 1,800 crore growth, which works out to about 17%, 18% -- just under 20% growth between the December '21 to December '22. So honestly speaking, looks like the pattern is that we should be having the similar growth or even slightly more during the next financial year is what we are expecting. See, basically how we are managing is we go for -- our preference, as I have been repeatedly saying, we do gold loans at places where we don't have other things to do. Our risk-adjusted return in the regular advances is a shade better than the gold loan front. At the same time, gold loans give advantage on the capital adequacy front. That's why we currently have over 20% Tier 1 ratio. If we are able to grow our regular advances, the growth rate of gold loans will take a back seat. If we are not comfortable in growing the SME segment, we try to grow the gold loan portfolio better to go for the overall thing, which once again is going to be determined to some extent by how the systemic deposit growth will increase. So we will get a clarity on exact expectations along with our fourth quarter results regarding the growth expectation for the next year.

Understood. That's very helpful. And my second question related to the same topic was do you think you are gaining market share? And what is the typical gold loan size that we are issuing to customers and what is the tenure of those loans?

The segment is between INR 1.5 lakhs is the range for - INR 1.6 lakhs to INR 2 lakhs is for the agri loan and around INR 1 lakhs to INR 1.5 lakhs for the non-agri personal gold loan. We don't look or give focus too much into the market share per se. So basically we grow our book depending upon our convenience and our comfort, which we think is in the best interest for the overall balance sheet growth and our own earning metrics of the bank. So we don't try to push things. The market share is something which has not been a consideration on these things.

Understood. And typically, what is the yield on these loans?

Typically around you have a range of 8% to 9% depending upon the agri, non-agri, KCC, various portions are there. It should be close to 9%.

The next question is from the line of Rohan Mandora from Equirus Securities.

Sir, in the comments you had indicated that we have a translation of around 100 basis points to 150 basis points on the advances. But if I look at the year-on-year number, there's a decline -- even in 2Q there was a decline [indiscernible]. So just wanted to understand is it that there are renegotiations happening on the spreads or how should 1 look at the movement on yield on advances overall?

See, here you have what you call 1 particular item. The gold loan is something which has to some extent altered the issue and also we need to differentiate between the gold loan and the non-gold loan. So gold loan segment is something which is around 9% which is pulling down the average. So overall in non-gold loan portion, we are able to take that to whatever thing. For example, first quarter our overall yield was only 9.04%. We could see about 35 basis point incremental growth for the second quarter. Now if it had not been there, there could have been a few more issues. So the negotiations definitely happened. That's why I said the overall pass on about 50% of the hike to the regular borrowers.

But sir, if you look at on a year-on-year basis excluding the gold loan book also if 100 basis point has increased, then there should have been some increase on a year-on-year basis. But sequential there's an uptick in 2Q?

That's what I said. Since for example the gold loan segment is separate and non-gold loan segment is separate, you don't see the incremental item to gold loan directly getting benefited because it is given on a fixed rate. So whatever things we are able to pass on to the non-gold loan is something which I'm telling.

Right, sir. What was the yield on the non-gold loan portfolio and how would it have moved in the last 2, 3 quarters?

It's about [indiscernible] is what we have seen in that.

Okay, sir. Second one, sir, in terms of the deposits if I look at this quarter sequentially, it has been broadly flattish. So just wanted to understand are there challenges in raising deposit or is it some like we were slower strategically to raise deposits? Just your comments over there.

Yes. This time the things started to grow only towards the quarter end. We are seeing good growth after the first quarter and we could see migration of -- when we increase the term deposit rate in the third quarter, migration from the CASA to the term deposit is what we see. So that's what our expectation is that we should be getting our clarity and overall there should be sufficient deposit growth to take care of our advance growth rate to be double digit.

And sir, in terms of contraction on maturity of deposits, what proportion of deposits would reprice over next 1 year?

You will always have not less than 2/3 of your term deposits, I mean maybe about 75% of the deposits will be. The preferred duration for the term deposits will be 1 year. So let's say 70%, 75% of your term deposits will be repricing within 1 year.

Sure, sir. And sir, just lastly, on the comments around the growth due to weakness in CapEx. So just wanted to understand in the segment where we cater to like how -- because if you look at the commentary from [indiscernible] or others in the consumption link sector, there's a reasonable CapEx happening with respect to replacement CapEx and some capacity enhancement. So when you're saying that RBI report the capital utilization is 75% and typically we see CapEx coming in at 85%. So would that be a fair assessment that even in next year it will be difficult to get CapEx linked growth for us or should we consider that the CapEx link demand for us is slightly leading from the overall growth from the larger companies? What is our historical experience here?

Yes. What we see as a trend now is whatever request we get from the SME front on investment in the fixed assets, most of the things are now -- they have started to happen on the solar and the sort of nonconventional energy thing, which is not directly linked with the capacity utilization. This probably acts as a substitute for their energy cost. But our experience is that once things have stabilized after coming back to the pre-COVID level, if things happen -- for example our expectation was that these things should have started somewhere in the middle of the last year, but the war oil inflation and macroeconomic instability postponed that and we expected that to start by December. Now also we are not seeing whatever we wanted to see in December. But once things start improving, it should happen very fast. So let us wait and see. Like overall as we are hearing why are you waiting to go for fixed assets or something you hear even during the budget speech and all to the private sector. Looks like when it turns, the turning has to happen really quickly.

The next question is from the line of Gaurav Jani from Prabhudas Lilladher.

Sir, can you hear me?

Yes, go ahead, please.

Sir, just firstly on the related to loan and deposit growth. So what sort of an LDR can we stretch ourselves to?

Theoretically if you ask, you can stretch up to 90%. That you can do only when you are 100% comfort that you are going to be there only for 2 quarters. Beyond the third quarter, you will get back to that 85%. Running with 90% LDR for a longer time is not advisable. So that is not in the long-term interest of the bank. Theoretically, you can increase it to 90% when you get a clarity on the comfort that you are going to be there only for 2 quarters.

Understood. Sir, where I'm coming from is actually that if you look at FY '23 and then compare with '24, you will actually need sort of to maintain a 87% LDR, the deposit growth has to actually exceed the loan growth in '24. So I'm just wondering as to how would we sort of achieve that.

No, no, not exactly. Let's say if incremental thing has to be at not less than 85% or so. As I told you, I have surplus liquidity of INR 3,000 crores, which I have. So I can take a call depending upon the general economic environment where I feel that I can increase and accelerate and I should be able to come back in the next couple of quarters and all. Incremental LDR of 85% will do even to maintain the LDR at the current level.

Understood. Sir, secondly, on this item of INR 32 crore. So can you expect this entire amount to be recognized in Q4?

Can you repeat, please?

Can we expect this entire INR 32 crore to be recognized in Q4 of FY '23?

Yes. We are actually working for it. There is a process so we have to complete the paperwork which has to be audited, which has to be then given to the regulator for inspection and there is the process. So we hope it should be completed before the current year and we have to wait and see. We are working with that deadline only.

Okay. So the point being that the interest income would be normalized in Q4 and over and above that, there will be a INR 32 crore of additional interest that will be recognized, right?

Yes. If the process gets completed as per the comfort and the confidence of the regulator before audit, that should be the position.

Okay. But what is your sense that the process will be completed?

See, honestly speaking, we did not expect this shock even now and that's why -- and we hope to complete that by the next quarter. So I am basically working with yesterday's target. Hopefully, it should get sorted out before the Q4.

Understood. Sir, lastly, you mentioned that PCR would sort of -- now we would start building up on the PCR. So any specific targets we have over the next few years as to what sort of level do we take the PCR to? And hence will sort of credit costs remain a bit elevated?

See, it's not very high or I mean have any major disturbance to your ROA calculations and all. So my internal target will be to take PCR with the technical write-off to 70% and maybe without technical write-off to 50%. We are just about 3 percentage points, 4 percentage points from that number and smoothly it should sail trough.

So by '24 and safe to assume that you will reach this 50%?

Maybe even before that.

The next question is from the line of Jai Mundhra from B&K Securities.

Most of the questions have been answered, sir. Just 1 question. So sir, in your opening remarks, you mentioned on ECL that you have come at a number of INR 200 crores, which would suffice for you to transition to ECL. I wanted to get an understanding, sir, I mean what is the maths behind that INR 200 crore number? INR 200 crore is roughly 10% of your GNPA, right? So if I were to do, then your specific PCR will rise from 43% to maybe 53%. How are you sort of arriving at that shortfall? That is the only question.

See, basically the thing is that on ECL method, you have both what you call probability of default and loss on default. So on loss on default already as we have told, the haircut is maybe about 30% or whatever it is which we have consistently seen. If you just take that number, our provision already whatever we have should be sufficient to take care of whatever losses that could potentially come because of the default. So on that spirit, you should not be requiring any incremental thing. But at the same time sometimes if you read the circular, you will feel that your provision you have to make even more than the advances whatever you have. So if there is even SMA 0 or SMA 1 you have to make, even if you give an interest rate concession you have to make. Like that there are lot of numbers, which have been basically given. So taking into account all these things on a continuous basis and also once again these numbers on the PCRs and all, they are all interconnected to a greater extent. If we do these things quick as possible, maybe like I may be ready, I need not require for the -- we will get a better clarity. So taking all these things into account, this is purely a back of the envelope calculation taking into account actual loss on NPA accounts and expected loss -- after the SMA 0, 1, 2 accounts after becoming NPA, how much of that becomes NPA and do that and all. After taking all these things into account and all, that number is arrived at a broader level.

Understood. So more from Stage 1 to Stage 2 sort of an account, right? Mostly on SMA where you may be doing only standard assets provisioning wherein that you may have to increase the provisioning?

Yes. See as I told you, if you take purely like there are 2 things. One is the probability of default and number 2, loss on default. So loss on default finally ultimately we see we are able to have this 30% haircut or whatever it is. So on that basis, for example the current level should be sufficient to take care of this. So since so many things have basically come and I have also given you from 2019 onwards the difference between the cumulative provision whatever we have made based on IFRS norms and based on Ind AS are not very different and all. So as you said, you can say okay, it's a worst come worst 10% extra provisioning and cushion you are creating and which will be falling into taking care of all these other items which banks have to recognize and all.

Understood, sir. And secondly, sir, in the RBI policy meeting, they had mentioned that the banks now need to rationalize the P&L provisions. If you can quantify, sir, what is the amount of money that we have collected through P&L interest and what is our policy? Because we probably have SMA customers, do we charge P&L interest to them and what would be the total such penalty for FY '22 or maybe 9 months?

See, basically there are 2 things. When I actually listen to that presentation, it was more where basically pointed towards the P&L charges on takeover. But other P&L charges and all for example if accounts go to -- SMA accounts go to these things and all, I don't expect any major thing will come in. We will be -- the exact quantification we will be in a position to say only after seeing the ultimate circular. I mean I don't feel that we are overcharging and all on that front. Let us see after the arrival of the circular.

The next question is from the line of Prakhar Agarwal from Elara Capital.

Just 2, 3 questions again. First, a follow-up on the previous question on ECL assumptions. When we made these ECL assumptions, have we taken 2, 2.5 years data during COVID or possibly we have taken that as an outlier and based on our ECL estimates, we have not taken those into consideration which is first?

Basically since we started with the 2019, the consideration was even 2 years before the COVID.

Okay. So we are taking from 2017 and until date.

Something like that. And this particular exact quantification can be given only after seeing the final RBI circular. This is the preliminary estimate.

Perfect. Sir, second thing on your deposit side. So possibly what is the strategy going ahead on deposit because are we seeing another rate hike on the deposit side or what is the strategy in terms of how to go about that deposit piece for us?

At this point of time we don't expect any deposit rate hike. Exact position probably the fourth quarter and even first quarter are going to be extremely crucial on understanding the quantum of rate hike.

Got it. And sir, just last question on this provisions if I were to just look at the composition of provisions. So there are a couple of writebacks which has happened during this quarter. One possibly you highlighted that you have written back something on SpiceJet if I'm not wrong. Can you again mention the quantum of that particular writeback and what is the other writeback that probably you are seeing on P&L when we see the provision composition?

See here, INR 25 crore writeback from the SpiceJet front.

Okay. And the balance INR 15 crores?

Yes, we have INR 75 crore provision against the INR 66 crore outstanding.

Okay. And sir, in the P&L there is another writeback of around INR 15 crores to INR 20-odd crores.

INR 15 crores this is from the standard assets writeback. When the standard assets became NPA, on gross basis it had to be reversed and NPA provision had to be made.

The next question is from the line of Darpin Shah from Haitong India.

Sir, just again on the provisioning bit. So when you mentioned you want to increase the coverage ratios to 50% on a calculated basis, are you assuming the writebacks from SpiceJet as well?

Yes, definitely.

So you expect this account to be completely 0 by June next year if I'm not wrong. So by then, all the INR 75 crores reversal will happen and thus the impact on P&L will be relatively lesser by that quarter. Is that understanding fair?

You can assume that way. See, whether we are doing that amount or taking that into pool or taking from the P&L, those things are a matter of discretion. But what is clear is that if the repayment of SpiceJet is going as per whatever it has happened, it is expected to close the entire outstanding by June and the entire amount will be available for appropriation.

Okay. And that is where your confidence on 1.5% ROA is derived from, right?

See, I have equal confidence on the increased NPA recovery also.

Okay. Fair enough, sir. And sir, again on growth. While we see that we need to see lot of things falling in place, but industry as a whole has been growing at a much faster pace. So don't you have a feeling that you are missing on something?

See, the issue is if you outgrow your deposit for a prolonged period of time, it is going to create other problems in the future. So we will take everything into account and take a balanced approach. Particularly one of the most important thing that is needed is not getting carried away by what others are doing. Precisely because of that only we survived many shocks in the past whenever we were not comfortable and we have to be cautious and we have to be careful in particularly treading this situation. And for example the same thing -- the call which we took in not getting into the consortiums and corporate lending, the same questions were asked that we were losing some opportunity. Similarly there could be short-term opportunities that may be lost, but those things can be covered up at any point of time. But it will be too risky to push for growth when many parameters which are not exactly falling online. Particularly at this particular point of time the investment cycle has not started and there is a huge gap in the system between the deposits and advances. Some growth you can grow in the short term by takeover from the other banks or from increasing your LDRs and all, but these and all can be only short-term strategies. But when you try to break the limitations of the overall metrics, the risk from that will be more outweighing the positive points on increase the profitability and things like that. So we will be taking this call in a gradual and as cautious we were, we will be taking these calls.

Sir, we really appreciate this. We have been conservative when it has paid us very well over the last 5, 7, 8, 10 years. But the thing is the most conservative lenders on the street, the couple of largest banks even they were significantly aggressive. They have been saying that it is a central time for another credit cycle both in terms of growth and quality. So that is where I was coming in from. But I do get your point.

See, they have a presence in the multiple states so they may be seeing different opportunities at different places and there will always be difference in their respective risk weights. So if they may be able to do certain things in a better way means, we have to respect that and see that. But I mean if I try to copy or try to do something because some other banks with different strength try to do something and all, it may not be good for the bank in a larger way. That's what I'm trying to say. So if they have better things, I mean let us respect that and see that.

The next question is from the line of [ Akshay Doshi from InCred Capital ].

Sir, in the MSME segment which forms the majority of our book and sir, in budget '24, our FM has given a credit guarantee scheme through 9,000 corporates. So sir, I wanted to know that what will be the impact on our MSME business and our customers?

See, we are also waiting for the fine prints. Whether it is exclusively for the existing -- to what extent it will cover the existing CGTMSE or whether they are going to have different items, we have to see. So existing system roughly takes care of those exposures, which are less than INR 1 crore on non-collateralized lending. It will definitely help the MSMEs without much collateral, but having a proper business plan to use that and get access to the banking credit.

Okay. Sir, and also I see in your presentation that you have made many partnership with the fintechs to increase your business digitally. So sir, wanted to get an idea that what percentage of your IT expense is to the total expense?

See, total annual expense from both capital and revenue put together will be about INR 200 crore.

Sir, no, I just wanted to know the proportion of your IT expense to total?

Other data you have, you can make your own calculation. It roughly works out to about say 30% of the PAT.

Okay, sir. Got it. Sir, and do you have any plans to expand more in the states of Gujarat and Maharashtra to exclude the MSME business? And also wanted to know that what kind of yields are we earning on MSME and also do we wish to keep the MSME proportion at 50% also in FY '24?

See yes, we opened about a handful of branches each in Rajasthan, Gujarat, and all we have done over a period of time. So as we have been repeatedly saying, we are better at the mofussil centers than at the metros and all. We will continue to do that. Regarding the proportion of this thing. Say for example when I joined the bank, we had up to 14%, 15% gold loan which I reduced it to single digits, then it came back to 18%, 19%, once again got back to single digits, then it went back to 20% plus currently. So whenever we don't have -- we feel other things are risky, we go with the gold loan. Even the current MSME loan overall we have MSME as per the definition of law on the Udyam Registration and all, already we have more than 50% MSME. The trading put together which both are considered as MSME as per the ac, it is over 50% even now.

Okay, sir. And sir, can you give the split of your floating and fixed as on Q3 FY '23?

Except the gold loan, the other loans are by and large floating only.

Okay. And sir, just to confirm 1 last thing that your total secured book so 100% of that is collateralized, I mean you have 100% collaterals on each debt?

See, it cannot be said that having 100% of collateral on every debt. The secured lending is basically coming from the RBI definition of the secured credit. By and large we have not less than 75% or 80% collateral coverage to not less than 90% of the loan book.

The next question is from the line of Gaurav Jani from Prabhudas Lilladher.

Just 1 question regarding the restructured portfolio. From a peak of about INR 2,280 crores, the portfolio has reduced by about INR 545 crore or INR 550 crore. So can you split that between slippages and recoveries, please, out of the INR 550 crores?

See, if you remember in the beginning of restructuring, I said 15% to 20% will go [ bad ]. Currently our expectation -- so overall against the expectation of a 20%, I don't have the exact number, but I remember discussing about this, I have about 7% became NPA of that expected 15% to 20%.

Thank you. As there are no further questions, I now hand the conference over to management for closing comments.

Once again thank you all for attending this. The Q3 little bit the focus was more on the compliance and other issues and there were some issues with the investment cycle did not pick up as we expected. But rest all things are positive only. And whatever we shared with you all regarding the growth, regarding the net interest margin, regarding the ROA and all in the earlier quarter; by and large things are online and we hope they will be on for the future also. So almost everything is in the range whatever we had shared with you all. We may marginally fall short for the 15% to 18% growth rate. But still I think it's not bad, we should be able to take it forward once we get the signals and all. Overall things are getting better and better, but may not be at the pace we expected during the last con call and all, but definitely the direction is very much positive and things are improving. So if the focus on recovery and of NPA particularly will play a major role in the next year to protect the ROA if the environment is not good for growth and all. But on profitability front, we should be able to continue with whatever we have been doing and whatever we have been sharing. So with this, if you have any more questions particularly on the numbers and all, the contact details of Mr. Jayaraman is already there in the presentation, you can get in touch with him. Any time you need any details, you can always get in touch with him and all. Once again thank you all for participating in this conference on Saturday. I hope going forward things should be improving and let us hope for the best going forward. Thank you, all.

Thank you very much. On behalf of AMBIT Capital, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us and you may now disconnect your lines.