Good afternoon, and welcome to the Camping World Holdings conference call to discuss financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2016. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that reproduction of this call in whole or in part is not permitted without written authorization from the company. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. On the call today from management are Marcus Lemonis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Tom Wolfe, Chief Financial Officer; Brent Moody, Chief operating and Legal Officer; and Roger Nuttall, President of Camping World Retail Operations. I will turn the call over to Mr. Moody to get started. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. A press release covering the company's fourth quarter and full year 2016 financial results was issued this afternoon, and a copy of that press release can be found in the Investor Relations section on the company's website. Before we get started, it's important to note that management's remarks on this call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These may include statements regarding our business goals, plans and abilities, industry and customer trends, growth of customer base, retail location openings and acquisitions and anticipated financial performance. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these statements as a result of various important factors, including those discussed in the Risk Factors section in our Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed shortly and our other reports filed with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them. Please also note that we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures on today's calls such as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, which we believe may be important to investors to assess our operating performance. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release and our website. Now with pleasure, I'll return -- I'll turn the call over to Marcus.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. It is with great excitement for us to report our fourth quarter and full year results. And no matter how you look at it, we had a strong fourth quarter and a full year. For the quarter, total revenue increased almost 4% to $670 million, right on target with where we want it to be. Net income increased nearly 14% to $14 million, and adjusted EBITDA for the quarter increased 27% to $39 million. Total revenue increased for the year 7% to $3.5 billion. Net income increased 14% to $203 million, and our adjusted EBITDA increased 15% to $291.3 million. As many of you have heard me say before, we're focused on driving profitability and cash flow across this organization. While revenue growth is nice, but it does not pay the bills, and it is not something we target or are focused on. Every single decision we make is with the intention of improving profitability and cash flow across the organization, and we channel our focus on EBITDA, operating margin, return on capital and free cash flow. We operate the largest network of RV dealers in the United States, and we sell a lot of new and used RVs. This drives the sale of other higher-margin and recurring-revenue services and products such as finance and insurance, parts and service, roadside assistance, extended warranties, collision repair, memberships and RV supplies. As we continue to grow our business, we emphasize growth of our proprietary database, of which we had over 3.3 million active customers at the end of the year. This proprietary database allows us to strategically cross-market and cross-sell all of our services and products. We acquire and open new retail locations to grow this database. Last year, we acquired 6 new dealerships and opened…

Thanks, Marcus, and good afternoon, everyone. We had a strong fourth quarter and fiscal year. Since the press release contains detailed financial tables and explanations, let me just touch on some of the highlights for the fourth quarter. Unless I state otherwise, comparisons are to the same period of 2015. Revenue growth was fairly balanced between the 2 segments, with Consumer Services and Plans up 4.4% to $49 million and Retail up 3.4% to $621 million. As Marcus indicated, the trend towards towable units and younger buyers continues to be a net positive for the overall business. We believe this continues to expand the base of RV customers and allows us to cross-sell a greater number of other higher-margin recurring revenue products and services. Most notably are our extended warranty, roadside assistance and finance and insurance programs, which all experienced healthy increases in the quarter from an increase in the number of dealerships and better penetration. The biggest standout was finance and insurance revenue, which increased 24.9% to $41.2 million, equal to 8.9% of total vehicle sales. Gross margin was strong across the board in the quarter, increasing 469 basis points to 58.7% in the Consumer Services and Plans segment, and increasing 154 basis points to 27% in the Retail segment. Again, strong sales of higher-margin products and service such as extended warranty, roadside assistance and finance and insurance programs were the primary reasons for the gross margin increase. Operating expenses were well-controlled in the quarter, with SG&A increasing 4%, in line with sales and decreasing as a percentage of total gross profit by 399 basis points. Floor plan interest expense increased $4 million from $1.9 million, primarily from higher inventory from the 7 new dealerships added in 2016 and a modest increase in our average borrowing rate. Adjusted EBITDA,…

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Rick Nelson with Stephens.

Marcus, the acquisition pace has been a lot more aggressive. Can we model that? You've done 9 deals now since the IPO in October. If you could comment on the pipeline and what sort of acquisitions with D&A guidance, the revenue and EBITDA forecast to [indiscernible]?

So the forecast that Tom just spoke about includes the pending acquisitions as well as completed. But the pace of those or the actual completion of those will be staggered throughout the 2017 calendar year. So that's why that number is reflected at $315 million on an approximate basis. It was always my impression, as I told the analyst during our whole process, that we would continue to run the business the same exact way we've run it for years. And when opportunistic acquisitions pop upped and our human capital allowed it, we would continue to make them. But the challenge that I have had historically and will continue to have is that I can't forecast what opportunities are going to come up. I don't want to ever be forced to make acquisitions because we've set some standard, but I will never pass up on an opportunity to grow our market share in a particular market or to find a new point. It was really my goal in the back half of 2016 to diligently look for more, and we have been very blessed in the sense that we have found some great acquisitions and ones that synergistically really work for our database and our membership services as well as our Retail segment.

Fair enough. Any comments on the multiples that you're paying on these acquisitions? Has that changed? And what is motivating these people to do -- to sell to you?

So similarly to historical acquisitions, we find some that are less than 1x and we find some that are 4x based on their tenure and their history. But one of the trends that has existed for years in the RV industry that will continue to exist is there is no real exit strategy for sellers. And so when we talk about white space in this country, it isn't the white space doesn't exist just where we don't have stores. It exists where we don't have stores and in markets where we have existing stores, and we believe that the market can absorb more. I don't see any slowdown or end to the opportunity that's out there as long as sellers continue to not have any other exit strategy at this point other than us.

And finally, if I can ask you where your crystal ball suggest we are today in terms of the RV cycle, you think middle innings, late innings or anything you're concerned about as it relates to unit sales?

I -- yes, I don't like to predict baseball, but I will tell you that we see no signs at this point of any change in our momentum. And I'm referring to the company's momentum. And as we look at the traffic in recent months and we look at our transactions in recent months, we see no sign of a slowdown of any kind. We continue to see very robust growth on the towable side and believe that with an expanded digital presence, we can really capitalize on that. But the industry feels as healthy as it ever has right now and see no signs, either geographically or in any segment, that give us a reason to be concerned.

We will take our next question from David Tamberrino with Goldman Sachs.

I think a couple of questions just on new sales. It looked like your average ASPs were much lower than at least what we were thinking about. And the decline year-over-year was about 9% versus about 5% in the third quarter. Is there anything that you would point to from maybe an acceleration of sales of towable units that should be continuing here? Or is there something else really at play that we should be thinking about?

Yes, David. I don't know if you remember us. I think you and I even talked about this. We, as a company, will continue to, as I pointed out on the roadshow and in the fourth quarter -- excuse me, at the end of the third quarter, continue to focus on driving down that ASP. I don't know how much lower it will go, but we have a very, very strong disposition of decelerating our focus on high-end motor rides, taking those dollars and transferring them into the low-end towables because we believe we have margin expansion and product expansion in that category. And so I told people before, we ended up hitting what we believe was the target for the fourth quarter with $670 million of revenue, but we were able to beat the earnings for the quarter because of the expanded margins and the tight SG&A. So average selling price has always been a focus of mine to drive it down, and we'll continue to, and there's a direct correlation between volume. So the reason I point that out, is average selling price dropped but we still hit our revenue number. What that means is we've picked up volume and we had expanded margin, which resulted in beating of the earnings for the quarter.

Understood. And kind of picking on that a little bit, the operating expense control, SG&A got a little bit more leverage out of the -- what is kind of a low fixed cost base for the company, given that you're supposed -- about 70% variable. What specifically can you point to for operational cost saves or really leverage that you got year-over-year for the quarter?

So we continue to get better in the fourth quarter, and I give Roger Nuttall a lot of credit. We continue to transfer dollars away from traditional marketing into digital marketing, which has a much greater return on investment and a lower cost of acquisition. So that's number one. Number two, we revised a number of pay plans on any historical acquisitions to move them to variable. And so as we continue to think about cost on a variable basis and we get out of operating in an environment where traditional advertising is our sole means of acquisition, we continue to see that reduction. There were no cataclysmic headcount changes or layoffs that drove it. Obviously, margin improvement contributes to that as well. So a combination of margin improvement, a shift of ad dollars and then shifting some pay plans from fixed to variable is really the result of what you're seeing there on the SG&A side.

Got it. So advertising and a lot of blocking and tackling is the revenue [indiscernible]?

It's not that we advertised less. We shifted the advertising to digital, and we just got a better return on it.

Understood. And last one for me. As we think about the new administration potential tax implications, just want to be clear on this, can you walk us through the impact of a lower corporate tax rate on your ownership structure? And if that could potentially increase special dividend payments to shareholders in the -- whatever the time period would be, in the '17, '18, '19, '20 time periods?

Yes. If the company experience -- as a 43% beneficial owner of the business and as the leader of this business, I see any change in corporate tax resulting in potentially 2 things. Number one, a continued investment in the growth of the company. Two, continued -- making sure that our leverage is in line with where we think it should be. And then third, continuing to enhance special distributions. But we don't see that money going into CapEx to pave more parking lots or fix more roofs. We see driving revenue or driving acquisitions, reducing debt and then special dividends.

We'll take our next question from Ryan Brinkman with JP Morgan.

This is Samik on behalf of Ryan. The first question we had, I sort of wanted to go back to something that's come up in both the 3Q call and today about the shortage of inventory on the used RVs. And I know you're prioritizing margins here when you're looking at the inventory and not finding it attractive in relation to value. But as we sort of now look into getting into the spring selling season, are you seeing anything change in early on in 2017, i.e., you are thinking changing in terms of how you are looking at inventory given that we are sort of closer to what looks like probably like more -- the 2 couple -- those 2 stronger quarters in the year going forward.

You know what, I'll address the philosophy and then I'm going to have Roger Nuttall, who is the President of our Retail business, address the technical answer. We, as a company, will never chase the dollar. I'm a big believer in managing the inventory with the tightest of strings so that we don't ever have to find ourselves overvalued in our inventory. We believe that the marketplace today gives us plenty of opportunity in the trade environment. We know that there is a marketplace to go out and buy used in the open market. But in our calculation, the risk is not greater than the reward. Now granted there are exceptions to that, but philosophically, while we keep hearing that we should be chasing revenue, we will not chase revenue at the risk of putting inventory on the ground that's going to devalue at a faster pace, taking margins that are below our standard for a return on capital and taking on a risk that we believe we may end up with aged inventory that we're going to take a loss on. Roger will be able to speak more specifically on how he's looking at the second quarter -- the first and second quarter, though.

Thank you, Marcus. Certainly, we're seeing a -- some pressure or a shortage of used inventory. That's nationwide. That is not something that is just specific to our company. However, in the last 2 to 3 months, we're seeing a stabilization of that used decline, that we're not seeing that same pressure on the used inventory that we saw in the latter part -- mid to latter part of 2016. So we're hopeful that we're going to be able to start building back on the other side some additional used inventory, and we're going to do that organically primarily through the -- through trades, like we have historically, and bringing them in at the right amount, not trying to go out and create additional revenue for just revenue's sake. But I see that as stable today, much more stable than it was, with the hope that within the next 12 to 18 months, we'll see some betterment in that particular segment when people start trading in some of the units that have been purchased -- a significant amount of units purchased in the last 2 to 3 years.

Yes. I want to just drive this point home one last time. We have this target of $670 million for the quarter. We were very pleased that we were able to beat that revenue objective. But again, our focus is return on capital and increasing cash flow. And we beat the earnings number, the EBITDA number for the quarter, in my opinion, very nicely, considering that the revenue was on par. We are going to continue to look for ways to improve cash flow and profitability, but we will not chase revenue, not for any sake. We won't open stores to just generate revenue for the sake of it. We won't make acquisitions at -- have what we consider subpar margins and we won't carry products that are going to have us invest dollars and not get a good return on capital. And so that's part of what our philosophy has always been and will continue to be.

Sure. No, got it. And I just wanted to check on the pace of greenfield activity because clearly, the preference here looks like to do acquisitions. That probably makes better sense even in terms of return on capital, as you mentioned. But when we think about greenfield activity in 2017, are there particular markets where you think there are not really a lot of acquisition opportunities and doing greenfield activity is sort of the only option there? Is there any -- any color on how the greenfield equity would look like in terms of new stores in 2017?

So we always have acquisition opportunities in every single market, but our discipline guides us to not pay a price for something that we don't need to. And unlike the auto business that is regulated by franchise agreements, we really want to balance out the risk-reward versus building the store in a market and making an acquisition. And when we believe that the line is crossed between a solid acquisition and the greenfield, we will default to the greenfield. We have a number of locations that are on the drawing board. Brent Moody can speak to what we have that's going to be announced and then what -- or what has already been announced and what's in process that he's permitted to talk about.

Yes. We have a few -- we have -- on the South border market, we'll be announcing that we're pretty close on a greenfield location. We have a strong presence in the state of Florida. The state of Texas is on target for us. We're looking at some stores in Ohio. We have several markets where, as Marcus said, the acquisition opportunities are not what we would like them to be, and we'll be going into the ground on a few locations within the next few months. We have 1 store that will be opening in Lexington, Kentucky in late May of this year, and another store that will be opening in Mississippi later this year.

It's very important to recognize that we will continue to grow the size of this business, the same way we have for the last so many years. And that our choice, whether we make acquisitions or do greenfields, I'm agnostic to how we do that. I'm just focused on making sure that we do that. And we really look at market-by-market on how we're going to do that. And there are certain occasions where we make a decision to develop and the marketplace finds out about that development and we get a call from the dealer who either came down on their price or didn't know that we were looking. But we are very focused, as all of you can tell by the recent announcements since even our last quarter, that we will continue to grow this company at a pace that gives a good return on investment, pays the right multiple, whether it's an acquisition of land or an acquisition on the goodwill side and growing our database. That was the primary objective of this company, is to grow its database, to cross-sell products and services. And the way we do that is by opening stores and acquiring stores. And that, obviously, you could tell based on the last 6 months that the fever -- that the fever that I have right now is more intense than maybe you anticipated, but that's the nature of the opportunity that's been presented and we'll continue to pursue what's available.

Yes, sure. That's very helpful color. One last one from us. I just wanted to check, there seems to be a year-on-year decline in parts and services revenue. So if any -- any color on what drove that? And was there like, any weather-related impact on that?

Roger?

Yes, you're actually right. And particularly, the service -- the parts and accessories segment of the business has been pretty consistent year-over-year. It hasn't had a significant growth rate, but it's been pretty constant as to what it has been in the last couple of years. The area where we probably had some -- one we have compression was in the service area. And that was we have significant amount of service opportunity, but we have a limited number of technicians. And that is an area where we have experienced a shortage. And so our services that we have been able to provide have slowed a little bit based on the number of technicians that we have employed and the number of technicians that we can find in the industry. We continue to work on that. We continue to train and develop programs to bring additional technicians. But today, we're operating with virtually the same number of technicians as we did a year ago with more dealerships on the board. So it's been a little bit of a challenge for us.

I wanted to just caveat something, and I appreciate you recognizing the decline, this is nothing to be alarmed about. The one thing you'll find out with me as you move forward quarter-to-quarter is that I have -- I'll be the first person to deliver the bad news. This is nothing that's alarming. And what we want to be careful in doing in delivering services is we don't want to just crank service out to have it all come back. We want to make sure that we're delivering good quality service, at the right price, maximizing the margin and not putting ourselves in any situation where we're delivering something that's going to come back and have to be redone or more importantly, be a problem and expose ourself with a liability. So we will continue to monitor this and discuss this with everybody on the call and all of our shareholders going forward, but this is not an area that I'm concerned about, other than we continue to look for human capital, but nothing -- nothing that anybody should be alarmed about.

We will take our next question from Rafe Jadrosich with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

It's Rafe. Just on the -- for the first question, the F&I as a percent of vehicle was up. Can you just talk about kind of what's driving the attachment rates higher, and then what's sort of the outlook for that? And how high do you think that can go over time?

Well, as I've talked about in the past, we continue to be focused on that average selling price, which drives towables. And that towable market is so right for us, both in terms of market opportunity to sell them and grow our share, but market opportunity for us to find the buyer, who quite frankly wants to buy the products and services to enhance their overall purchase. Remember that the towables that we sell typically are financed -- they could be financed anywhere from 8 to 10 years. And so that term allows for warranties and roadside and other value-added products to the consumer to be added on. And they really believe that they need that. They're a payment-sensitive buyer who doesn't have the ability to self-insure the risk. But we believe that there's a direct correlation between our mix and our ability to continue to hold the F&I number and stabilize it at the number that it's at. Do I think there's some opportunity to grow it? Maybe. But I think more importantly, our opportunity to hold that number in that range while we are at that average selling price is really my #1 focus. There will be a direct correlation to driving average selling price down and the F&I number going up. And so you'll be able to see that, as the average selling price goes up, that number will come down. But we believe our penetration opportunity is greater the more we drive that number down. So consistent with what I've said before, drive that average selling price down, continue to sell more towables, and that opportunity looks solid to maintain the level with the possibility of improving it.

And then, can you just comment a little bit on the Good Sam membership, how that trended during the quarter? And then maybe some of your initiatives to continue to grow your consumer file and database?

Tom, you want to take that one?

Sure. The Good Sam Club membership ended the year at 1,720,000, which is up over the quarter just slightly.

And as we think about driving the membership file there, right, there's a couple of ways we do that. The obvious ones are make acquisitions and open new stores. But in addition to that, we are working with our current credit card provider to come up with enhancements to the program that give us the ability to create a greater stickiness with that number. It's a challenge to keep the Good Sam member file growing. And what I will not do is discount the price of that membership, because we believe that the value that's offered in that membership is more than the price. In fact, we always are exploring opportunities to increase that price. Obviously, increasing the price could present a small drag on the growth. But again, we're focused on growing the file in an intelligent way, but more importantly, a very profitable way. So we've had growth, but we will not accelerate or put the pedal on the gas just to grow the number if we're not growing the requisite profitability with it.

And then, just a final question. As you look around the industry, how do you feel about, maybe not just at Camping World, but sell-through versus the sell-in trend? Do you think some of your competitors have too much inventory, just can you comment on kind of the overall kind of retail environment out there?

The retail environment seems solid. We tend to focus more on what we're doing with our inventory and our sell-through. But as we look at our #1 supplier, Thor, and their backlog, but more importantly, what we see in their yard available for sale, we believe that things are very strong. And we tend to skew to Thor, and our growth usually results in their growth because they're so towable-centric. I can't speak to the other manufacturers because we don't really monitor them as closely. But we're not hearing anything to the contrary. Now of some of these acquisitions we're making, the really good ones, well, they have inventory and turns similar to ours, and the really crappy ones have inventory and turns that are less than ours. But that's a function of just really about process more than about industry. We think the industry is still red-hot right now.

So generally, the retail sell-through and then the unit selling, it sounds pretty balanced from what you're hearing?

It feels that way to me, yes.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from Tim Conder with Wells Fargo Securities.

Marcus, if I may continue on that same question just to parse it down a little bit more. How would you see it bouncing between the classes? Again, you're hitting it within the industry. Again, I know you're continuing to shift even more and more so to towables evidenced in the quarterly results here. But for the industry, is it short on towables and maybe relative between the classes of products? And then I guess, what type of -- if you compare year-over-year, the weight or the timing of ability to get product -- get the product that you need for your stores, how does that look on a year-over-year basis from the OEMs?

Yes. It's funny when you think about getting product, it's not about getting any products, it's about getting the right product. And for us, we're not only very class-centered in terms of making sure that we have the right towables, but we look at the lengths all the way down to the floor plans. And so we have probably a different scientific model, which is what gives us better results than our peers. For us, we still believe that the diesel market is soft. We don't see any change in that trend. But as we continue to invest more of our diesel dollars into our towable inventory, we continue to get those results. We can't really speak to what the manufacturers are doing, but we have to believe that because our company covers so many markets and such a large size of the marketplace, that we have to be a pretty decent mirror image of what that looks like. As we continue to move forward, Roger and I, I think, are locked hand in hand in understanding that gas motor homes at the right price point under $100,000 are great for us. Diesel motor homes under -- over $150,000, very spotty for us. Travel trailers under $24,000, that is our bread and butter. And that is how we believe we can drive the number of transactions and the number of actual customers that go through our doors even at the risk of this so-called revenue depression or revenue deceleration. The fifth-wheel market, and I'll have Roger speak to it, seems to be popping back a little bit. Roger, you want to talk a little bit more about that?

Yes. We're seeing that the fifth-wheel market is pretty steady at this point in time on the increase. It hasn't shown on the retail side the same kind of volume and volume increase as what we've seen on the travel trailer, but it's in the mid- to low single digits and we continue to see that increase. And we're -- we don't see any reason that, that isn't going just continue up that same ladder.

Okay, okay. And then if I may circle back on a couple of...

But just -- I could clarify one thing on the fifth wheels. I want you to think about towables and fifth wheels and motor homes the same way. There are entry level versions of it. There are mid-priced rate versions of it and there are high-priced versions of all of those. We like to play in the lower range -- mid- to lower range category of all of those. So just because it's a towable doesn't mean it's the right one for us. We don't want to carry predominantly a $45,000 towable or a $70,000 fifth wheel. And so it's important as you look at some of the manufacturers and look at our numbers that there -- that the fifth wheel can range from $20,000 to $70,000. Think about all the categories that way and really understand that the specific buyer is buying a payment and buying a floor plan. If you see a $70,000 fifth wheel being sold, that's usually a big motor home customer stepping down. Rarely, a towable -- a fifth wheel customer stepping up. If they're going to make that leap to $70,000, they may get into an entry-level gas. So we try to stay away from what we consider the fringes of both of those. But there's nothing that we ever consider too cheap. So a $9,000 travel trailer, we'll take them all day long as long as the walls don't fall apart. But a $35,000, $45,000 towable or $70,000 fifth wheel or a $250,000 to $300,000 motor home, I mean, we're not big fans of that. And that -- if we wanted to accelerate our revenue very quickly and really screw up our margins, we can get in that business. We could sell them, I don't know that we'd make any money.

Okay. No, helpful, Marcus. A quality dollar with a long-term annuity is still very green no matter what piece within there. I understood. No, helpful.

Yes.

Back to the acquisition side. At the -- how do you see the profitability profile, maybe that you outlined on the roadshow, of those acquisitions now versus then? Any material change in that or in the greenfield profile? And then, I guess, along that line, you also talked about regional service centers, not the retail center, but a regional service center, when that seems to be, as we hear across the industry, may be one of the weaknesses of the industry as a whole and you had outlined that also in the roadshow process as an opportunity. Maybe just give us an update on that and maybe, could those be levered better in higher-rent geographies? Is that a better way to address those markets?

So I'll address the first portion first. I love growing our business, and there really is no end to the number of acquisitions that this company can make. There is no barrier to entry. We have the capital. We have the room inside of our leverage. We have the free cash flow to do it. We have a golden share shareholder who believes in growth more than anything else, that's me. And we'll continue to make acquisitions as vehemently as we historically have. One of the things that we love about acquisitions is even when we find top performers, we're buying them on cash flow that is historical. So we could be paying 2x to 4x something that's historical. When we put our Camping World store in there, when Roger puts his F&I and his service process in there, when we layer-in the Good Sam database and all the products and services, we know that we take at least a turn of leverage on a pro forma basis going forward. Now there are exceptions to the rule. We are human. Sometimes we make an acquisition, it takes us a year to get the culture right. I mean, we've screwed a couple up and then they come back a year later. But for the most part, our view on acquisitions is the same. How many do you have and how many can we make and how fast can we do them? The real barrier, if there's any barrier to acquisitions, is how quickly can they be integrated into the company? There is a human capital barrier that I don't want to burn our people out and I don't want to have the culture that we implement into that new acquisition get wasted away. So if there is anything that slows us…

And as you had alluded to earlier, you're still -- that's probably one area where you're trying to find -- that you've got the shortage of the technicians so you've got to be careful how fast you build that. Understood. Okay.

You do, because we value the brand so much of that a poor service experience will contaminate the brand.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question with Craig Kennison with Baird.

On the acquisition front, are there any non-dealer targets in the pipeline?

None at this time. We did look at a few things and they didn't make sense. The only acquisition that we, I think, believe, announced, and Brent will correct me if I'm wrong, is on our events side. We are always looking at any acquisition that we could make to enhance roadside, to enhance insurance, to enhance warranty, to enhance our parts business. But none that we are prepared to announce at this time.

And then, you mentioned younger buyers coming to the market driving growth. We've been trying to put some figures behind that trend for some time. Is there anything you can share with us that would help us illustrate the trend towards the younger buyer in addition to what you're seeing with Boomers?

As the RV manufacturers have gotten more successful, not successful, but more successful, at making lightweight units for a smaller price, and the finance community, the retail banks, have gotten comfortable with the finance terms, allowing a first-time buyer to buy a $15,000 unit, we expect to continue to see growth in that segment. So yes, there is risk. Does the manufacturer screw up that process and get away from it? We don't think that's likely. Does our retail community decide to tighten up its reins? We haven't seen any indication of that. And as we think about doing it, Craig, we realized that the way to grow that market is threefold. We have to have a very strong presence digitally, we have to price our units online and be competitive digitally, we have to create a different buying experience digitally, and then we have to have the selection that gives them the options. So we're seeing prospects like we've never seen before in that younger group. We have to continue to get better at understanding how that younger buyer shops differently than our historical buyer and then adjust our sales process, not overall, but in that category, to attract that customer and more importantly, sell them something. We think that's a big driver of why our towable numbers have grown, and that's obviously a big driver why our margins are better and why our earnings are better.

And then lastly, you mentioned the credit side. Any anticipation of a change in behavior if rates were to move higher either from a wholesale standpoint or from a retail standpoint?

We come from an industry that has had interest rates as high as 17% when demand was very high. Obviously, 17%, we believe, would slow that down. We think that the rates can move nominally, and they wouldn't affect us because we make our money in F&I by selling value-added products more than we do reserve. For dealers that make most of their money on capturing rate from the customer, that could be affected. But we don't see a 1%, 2%, 3% rate change slowing down on a $15,000 to $20,000 towable. The number that moves when you finance $20,000, $30,000 over 120 months, it just doesn't move that much, which is another reason why we're trying to drive down ASP, to insulate ourselves from any potential slowdown that could happen in the diesel market. $200,000, the rate moves a point, that's meaningful. $20,000 over 10 years, not so meaningful.

And that concludes today's question-and-answer session. Mr. Moody, at this time, I'll turn the conference back to you for any additional or closing remarks.

No. I appreciate everyone taking the time and joining the call and the interest in the business. Thank you.

And this concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.