Good morning ladies and gentlemen and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Donaldson Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2012 conference call. During today’s presentation, all parties will be in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, the conference will be opened for questions. If you have a question, please press the star followed by the one on your touchtone phone. If you would like to withdraw your question, you can press the star followed by the two; and if you are using speaker equipment, please lift the handset before making your selection. This conference is being recorded today, Friday, May 18, 2012. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rich Sheffer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Alicia, and welcome everyone to Donaldson’s Fiscal 2012 Third Quarter conference call and webcast. Following my brief introduction, Bill Cook, our Chairman, President and CEO, and Jim Shaw, our Vice President and CFO will review our record third quarter earnings and updated outlook for fiscal ’12. Next, I need to review our Safe Harbor statement with you. Any statements in this call regarding our business that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, and our future results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements made today. Our actual results may be affected by many important factors, including risks and uncertainties identified in our press release and in our SEC filings. Now I’d like to turn the call over to Bill Cook. Bill?

Thanks, Rich, and good morning everyone. As you’ve seen in the press release we issued earlier this morning, we had a very good third quarter as we set records for our sales, our operating margin, and our earnings per share. I’d like to take a few minutes to review our results. Our third quarter sales were 647 million, up 9% over last year. Excluding the negative impact of foreign currency translation due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, we actually achieved organic sales growth of 11%. The combination of our 11% organic sales growth and a 15.2% operating margin helped to deliver a net income increase of 15% and earnings per share increase of 18% to an EPS record of $0.46 per share. As you know, within our company we have two reporting segments, and I’d like to cover a few highlights for each. I’ll start first with our engine products segment. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, our local currency sales increased 10%. The primary drivers of this 10% year-over-year increase were our first fit OEM businesses, on-road and off-road, which were up 37 and 13% respectively. The 37% increase in our on-road product sales was primarily due to a significant rebound in North American new heavy truck build rates at our customers. For example, Class A heavy truck builds in North America were 77,000 in our third quarter, a 44% increase over last year. We also saw strong year-over-year growth in Japan as a result of that country’s recovery from last year’s earthquake and tsunami. Our off-road product sales were up 13% as the agricultural and mining end markets our customers serve remained strong globally, and the U.S. construction equipment market continued to enjoy a strong replacement cycle. The ongoing strength in these end markets has increased…

Thanks, Bill, and good morning everyone. Our gross margin was 35.3% in the quarter, which is up 10 basis points from last year. Even though the percentage is fairly consistent with last year, there were some pluses and minuses in our gross margin number which I’ll walk you through. In the quarter, we benefited from improved absorption of fixed costs which increased gross margin by 40 basis points compared to last year. This increase was mainly driven by higher volumes in our plants and from fewer holidays and therefore more shipping days in this year’s third quarter. You may recall that the Chinese New Year holiday fell in our third quarter last year while it was in our second quarter this year. The other positive factor to mention was the impact of our continuous improvement initiative which increased our gross margin by 60 basis points. Slightly higher commodity prices compared to this time last year and the mix of our product sales were the primary unfavorable factors impacting our gross margin. We are expecting commodity prices to be stable at current levels for the balance of our fiscal year. Our operating expenses remain well under control, coming in at 20.1% of sales, which was down 110 basis points from last year. This improvement over last year comes from increased leverage of our fixed costs due to higher sales levels partially offset by selective operating expense investments we have made over the past year to support our strategic growth initiatives. In addition, while we continue to assess the direction of the global economy, we have been selective in adding our planned headcount additions. There is still a lot of uncertainty regarding the European economy and the pace of recovery in China, so we’ll continue to be measured in the pace with…

Thanks, Jim. As many of you know and as Jim just mentioned, we’re in the midst of our normal planning process for next fiscal year, fiscal ’13, which starts in August. Consequently, our standard practice during our third quarter calls such as this is to provide guidance for what we can currently see, which is through the end of our fiscal ’12. Per our normal practice and once our Board approves our new plan, we’ll provide our outlook for fiscal ’13 when we release our year-end results on August 27. So for the balance of this fiscal year, we expect that the overall European economy will remain at current business levels with southern Europe back in a recession and northern European growing slightly. We also expect the Chinese economy to continue to improve, which should also benefit the rest of Asia as well as our businesses in China. We expect North and Latin America to remain the strongest regions globally. Our outlook includes a stronger U.S. dollar than what we had assumed in our previous guidance that we issued in February. At the time we updated our forecast earlier this week, the U.S. dollar was a $1.28 versus the euro. This translates into about a 5% foreign currency headwind in our fourth quarter as the U.S. dollar was much weaker last year – it was approximately $1.43 to $1.44 then against the euro. So we expect our full-year sales to be approximately 2.5 billion or an increase of about 9% over last year’s record of 2.3 billion. This means that our fourth quarter is expected to be up organically about 11% in local currency terms, and then after adjusting for the projected 5% foreign currency headwind about 6% as we hope to report. Bottom line – we continue to see…

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question please press the star followed by the one on your touchtone phone. If you would like to withdraw your question, press the star followed by the two; and if you are using speaker equipment, please lift the handset before making your selection. Also, if you pressed star, one prior to this message, we ask that you please do so again at this time. One moment, please, for our first question. Our first question is from the line of Hamzah Mazari with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Hamzah Mazari – Credit Suisse: Good morning, thank you. The first question – Bill, I was just wondering if you could maybe walk us through how we should think about operating leverage in your business model going forward. You have some negative mix coming from slower aftermarket, but you’re getting a lot of volume, and then you’ve got some growth initiatives as well. How should we think about that operating leverage going forward in your business?

Hamzah, this is Bill. I’ll start, and then maybe Jim has some things he wants to add. But as we look forward in our strategic plan, our goal is to grow our sales, as we’ve talked about, between 8 and 10% per year and to continue to expand our operating margin, as we have been. As we’ve mentioned, we’re forecasting our operating margin to be a record this year, and it’s been up significantly over the past four years since we entered the recession. But going forward, we’re looking at probably about maybe a 20 basis point improvement year-over-year, not as significant as we saw in the last four years because part of our goal is not to maximize operating margin but to optimize that with the revenue growth. So we want to reinvest back in the business, and we are going to continue to expand it but not at the same rate. So we want to make sure that we protect the growth investments that we’re going to make.

Hamzah, this is Jim. The only thing I’d add to that is this quarter, as I mentioned in my comments, we’ve been very cautious in terms of headcount adds, and if the growth continues as we expect it, we will be adding headcount for some of the strategic investments. So our operating margin in terms of our operating expenses was very good this quarter, but I don’t think you can model in a lot of improvement from that number here, at least in the short term. Hamzah Mazari – Credit Suisse: Okay, that’s very helpful. And then maybe if you could comment on your liquid filtration exposure, what you are seeing in terms of acquisitions there. Do you intend on building that organically or look for further acquisitions? It seems like multiples have probably come off with the market, or how do you feel about multiples in this business, particularly given you’ve seen some deals in this space from some of the larger guys.

Okay, Hamzah – Bill. I’ll start. The 8 to 10% that we talk about in terms of our annual growth target is mostly organic, and that’s consistent with the way we’ve grown over the past two decades. That is our business model. Unfortunately, we see the organic growth opportunities in order to achieve most of that organically, so in that 8 to 10% we assume about maybe 2% of that will be through acquisitions and the balance will be organic. So while we are mostly an organic growth story, we do look for acquisitions. We have a team that’s always looking. The last one we did, though, was a couple years ago – three years ago – with Western Filter, which was a liquid filtration business which we acquired in California that serves the aerospace and defense markets. So that would be the types of things that we would look for, is liquid filtration businesses in markets we already know that bring us more product coverage or new customer contacts. You know, we’re always looking. In terms of the multiples, we have financial disciplines for our acquisition process, and we look for an acquisition to be earnings accretive by the end of the second year because we want to sort of do the heavy lifting quickly and then move it past that, and then ROI—get to our corporate ROI targets the end of year five, to the 15% corporate target. So we’re always looking. We don’t comment prospectively, and while we are looking we focus on our organic growth plan, and then we’ll try and do acquisitions if we can find them that fit our business model and our financial targets. Hamzah Mazari – Credit Suisse: Okay, great. And then just last question – maybe if you can just touch on your European exposure. It sounds like southern Europe declined sequentially for you, but northern Europe held in. Is that fair?

This is Bill again, Hamzah. You know, I think what we see—my comments were really sort of around those economies. First, our exposure in Greece is immaterial, okay, but we have businesses in other parts of the more major economies in southern Europe – Spain and Italy. We do see those economies in a recession now, back in a recession, while we see the northern European economies growing slightly. All of that is baked into our guidance, so I think we’ve got the exposure as we can see it now already incorporated. Hamzah Mazari – Credit Suisse: Great, thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Charlie Brady with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Charlie Brady – BMO Capital Markets: Thanks. Good morning, guys. First off on the off-road business, can you remind us what the mix is between the ag-mining and construction markets?

Charlie, this is Rich. Construction and mining combined are over half, probably 55, 60%. Some of those customers play on both sides, so it’s a little hard to split them out. I would say construction is more than the mining of that 55 to 60. Ag would be next at, call it 25 to 30%, then the balance would be light industrial, so things like forklifts and dock equipment, things like that. Charlie Brady – BMO Capital Markets: And on the mining side, in your prepared comments you talked about seeing it plateauing at kind of a current level, and obviously there’s a lot of discussion on longer term mining CAPEX. I just wondered, can you give some more granularity on what you’re hearing from your mining customers as to their visibility on what they’re doing with their plans, and how far visibility do you get into what they are thinking of?

Charlie, Bill here. I think with our major customers, we try to be as close to them as possible so that we can coordinate with their plans so we are where they need us to be, and to some extent I’ll cite the example of the investment we’re making in Suzhou as one example not only to serve Chinese OEMs but also our global OEMs that are making investments there. So longer term, we see construction mining as being very strong opportunities for us with a growing need for both infrastructure in both the emerging economies as well as the developed ones – a lot of that needs to be developed or replaced. And then mining, because of the continuing expanding need as economies like China and India and Brazil develop, they need more of the raw materials. So longer term, we’re very, very bullish, as are our customers on those. Charlie Brady – BMO Capital Markets: Okay, thanks. And switching gears, just on the gas turbine business – I know you don’t want to give a forecast for next year yet, but it sounds as though that business is looking pretty strong for you just on the end market backdrop, and I’m trying to get a sense of do you see a pretty meaningful pickup next year on the gas turbine business, just kind of what you’re seeing currently and going into Q4?

Charlie, Bill. Again, so Jim and Rich won’t let me comment specifically on next year because we haven’t finished the plan yet, but just to comment on that market, that is for us our latest cycle business, so it was sort of the last one into the recession and maybe the last one, just given sort of the long lead times for those projects, both to finish them once they’re started and to re-start them. But now that’s happened, so we do see this market on a pretty nice uptick on both parts that we talked about, so smaller turbines which are around energy exploration and transmission, so smaller turbines used on platforms offshore or in pipelines; and then on the larger ones, which have probably been the latest part of this business in terms of coming back, around, say, municipal power generation, so these large plants that we’ve talked about that would be used for electricity generation for industry or communities, and we see that happening in many parts of the world. We do see that in our customers. I think GE is projecting their turbine shipments being up about 20% in calendar ’12 over calendar ’11, so we’re not going to comment exactly on what we see for next fiscal year, but we do see the market on an uptick. Charlie Brady – BMO Capital Markets: Great, thanks.

And that’s probably going to be for the next two or three years, we think.

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Kevin Maczka with BB&T Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Kevin Maczka – BB&T Capital Markets: Good morning. Bill, on continuous improvement, you’re still making nice progress there. I know that’s kind of an ongoing thing and will always be; but 60 basis points that added to the gross margin, is this the kind of run rate, if you will, that we can continue to expect going forward, and can you say anything about any particular initiatives that you’re doing there that are really moving the needle and driving that 60 basis points?

So Kevin, a couple questions there. One is in terms of can you expect that exactly going forward? Well no, but I think on a—not 60 basis points quarter-over-quarter, but I think that is part of our model going forward in terms of supporting that increase in the expansion in our operating margin, and that is part of the DNA at Donaldson – continuous improvement – and it has been for many years. It’s what we need to do to make sure that we can maintain and improve our margins while basically at the same time delivering cost decreases for many of our customers and offsetting purchase material cost increases. So as we’ve talked about in the past, our pricing over long periods of time is essentially zero, okay? The way we expand margins is through growing our business and getting leverage, and expanding our gross margin through continuous improvement. Now Jim talked about in his comments that about a quarter of our capital is in support of our continuous improvement efforts, and that’s probably been a pretty good trend the last few years, and that would be new equipment, upgrading equipment and processes in our existing plants. So it starts with the product and then it goes into the processes, so it’s both an engineering and a manufacturing and a purchasing initiative, so it really encompasses all of the Company. Every plant has a goal and many of our plants’ gain-sharing arrangements are based on their success with that, so I think it is part the DNA here and I see that continuing to deliver dividends for us and help with the margin expansion we talked about earlier. Kevin Maczka – BB&T Capital Markets: Okay. And then a similar question as it relates to operating expense – nice progress there again this quarter, growing that much slower than revenues grew. I think last quarter there was a comment about slowing some headcount adds based on some uncertainties. Can you just comment again on what you said earlier about headcount coming back in perhaps as we go forward, and how that might impact the OPEX line?

Yeah, this is Jim. I mentioned that also in my comments today that we have been selective, given the uncertainty in Europe a quarter or so ago, the slowdown in China, did give us reason to be a little bit careful in how we added the headcount that was in our plan for this year. So we did get really good leverage this quarter, but at the same time I think as we get more comfortable that for sure the rest of this year looks solid and then as we develop our plan into next year, we are going to have to make some incremental adds in terms of supporting some of these strategic investments. So I think we achieved really good leverage from an operating expense standpoint this quarter, but I think that’s going to be under a little bit of pressure. Longer term, we’ve been shooting for the 21%, and we’re a little bit ahead of that here this year. Just as reference point on headcount, we’re at about 13,300 now, which is just about back to where we were at the peak of the recession. So we’re well up on sales, but essentially where we were back in ’08 on headcount.

I’ll add to that, Kevin. Our model is to grow our expense base over time at a slower rate than our sales, and there’s nothing new about that. That’s been Donaldson’s model for the past 20 years, and we’ll continue to do that. Kevin Maczka – BB&T Capital Markets: Okay, got it. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Eli Lustgarten with Longbow Securities. Please go ahead. Eli Lustgarten – Longbow Securities: Thank you. Good morning everyone. One clarification question – in your segment data, the corporate unallocated was less than $1 million – I guess it was 987, whatever it was. I think that’s an arbitrarily lower number than I think most of us expected. Can you give us some idea what happened there and what’s going on?

Yeah Eli, this is Jim. There’s a couple things that impact that corporate number. Some of it is corporate-related and some of it is timing related in terms of when certain costs hit our business unit. So on the corporate related items that aren’t allocated out to our business units would include things like interest income and expense, FX, we had some fees last year for registration fees for a tax project we did. All of those went favorable this year over last, so that’s about 2 million of the difference. The other piece of the corporate and unallocated relates to how some of our inter-company eliminations and sales work, and some of those costs, when we’re building inventory or in a very high growth mode like we were last year to meet the 20% growth in demand, we ended up having more cost unallocated initially as we were growing that inventory last year. So if you look historically, last year’s unallocated was quite high compared to our normal run rate, and now as our growth rates have come back to what we consider sort of our more normal growth rates, you’ll see sort of a normalization of that number. So those are the two factors at play. Eli Lustgarten – Longbow Securities: So we assume it’s about a 3 million run rate? You just indicated—is that the fair number?

Yeah, I mean, it does fluctuate so it’s hard to predict because of things like FX and other things we just can’t have a lot of visibility to; but historically it’s been in that range. Eli Lustgarten – Longbow Securities: And one other clarification – your guidance implies about a 50% increase in gas turbine sales in the fourth quarter. Your third quarter seemed a little light to me versus the guidance that we expected, so were some shipments postponed into the fourth quarter or transit out arbitrarily, or is it just the way the shipment schedules were?

Eli, this is Rich. Our gas turbine business, these are really large projects so it can really be affected by the timing of when some of these systems are supposed to ship. I think the scientific name for that is lumpy. So there were a couple projects that slipped a couple of weeks that are now going to be in our fourth quarter. We tend not to give specific quarterly guidance because of just factors like that. But we feel pretty comfortable of our full-year guidance at this point.

So we will have a very good fourth quarter. Eli Lustgarten – Longbow Securities: And can you give us—when you talk about the end markets, particularly how strong the on-road and off-road markets have been, the problem in the on-road market is with 77,000 production in the first quarter and whether it goes up or not in the second quarter, they’re over-producing the yearly forecast and orders have been slower. Are you seeing any indications from anyone yet of paring back production schedules, or how they’re going to adjust? If 298 is right and that’s almost considered high, 77 times 4 is 308, so we’re over—we’re producing over the annual rate at this point. So are we hearing anything about the intent to cut back or they’re going to build some inventory, or what’s going on in the on-road business?

Eli, this is Bill. I think where see the cutbacks is in Europe, where customers have announced that related to the conditions there. You’re right – if you annualize this 77, it’s a little bit more than what they’re forecasting for the year. But we take a look and take some comfort in the fact that that 298 is up 16% over last year, so it might not be growing at the same rate that it was a year ago year-over-year, but it’s still going to be a nice healthy increase during the balance of the year. Eli Lustgarten – Longbow Securities: And one final question – are we hearing anything going on in pricing for products, going on both here or outside the United States, any change in pricing? Any improvement in cost-price relationships, what have you?

Eli – Bill, and I’ll turn it over to Jim – he can talk a little bit about what we’re seeing from a purchasing perspective. But I would say maybe the good news is we haven’t seen a replay of some of the significant commodity increases that we saw a couple years ago, or two years ago; and that’s good for us and for our customers. Jim?

Yeah, this is Jim. In terms of commodity costs, as I mentioned, we are up year-over-year, but what we’ve seen is the last three, four months and actually anticipating here at least for the rest of the year, that commodity costs have really calmed down. I think one of the services we subscribe to called it a pause, so there haven’t been any real—really, pricing action has been almost none here over the last quarter or so, and we don’t really see any for the next couple months. Eli Lustgarten – Longbow Securities: Thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Brian Drab with William Blair. Please go ahead. Brian Drab – William Blair: Good morning. Congratulations on another great quarter. Most of my questions have been asked at this point, but I wanted to follow up on the question that was just asked about the North American truck market. I know the first fit North American market is not a very significant portion of your sales at this point, but you mentioned the ACT data. The retail sales and the order rates really have slowed down, and it just doesn’t seem to connect with the forecasts for continued strength in engine builds. So I’m wondering if you could talk a little bit more about that. I’m surprised that you didn’t today talk about potential for that to slow down but instead cited that bullish forecast from ACT, which a lot of people are now expecting would be revised downward a little bit. So I’m wondering if you could add any more color there. It sounds like you’re not seeing any slowdown in that market at this point.

Brian, Bill here. You know, I might not have said this clearly. I think we’ve seen the rate of increase is certainly different now than they were this time a year ago in North America. So slowing down isn’t the same as going down, to us. Right now, we take a look at sort of putting it all together and sort of getting away from maybe some of the gyrations month to month. We look at what our customers and outside experts like ACT say in terms of the year-over-year—the calendar year-over-year increase, so that gives us some visibility through the balance of this calendar year and the first half of our next fiscal year. The North American heavy truck business is an important part of our business – the first fit – but it’s a small part of our overall sales, less than 10%. So we’ll continue to watch it but we don’t see the market going down; it’s the rate of increase slowing down. Brian Drab – William Blair: Okay, okay. And then just one more question – on the China market, a few questions on that market. Can you remind us what percentage of your sales in China are in the on-road truck market, and then what was the growth rate that you saw in that market in the quarter and what do you expect in the next quarter?

It’s Bill again. The percentage, Brian, of on-road truck market – first, the heavy truck market in China is a very small percentage of our Chinese business. We just won a couple of major platforms (inaudible) launching, so the opportunity is out in front of us. We have seen industry statistics that say the build rates for heavy trucks in China is going to be down year-over-year from ’11 to ’12, so ’12 is going to be down—I think it’s going to be down about 12 or 13%, in the low double digits. But that’s at about—we’re talking about numbers of around 900,000 trucks, so it’s a huge market still, of which we have a very small share – a small share, but a growing share. So it’s a small part of our business but we hope to make it a lot larger part of our business going forward. Brian Drab – William Blair: Okay, thanks very much.

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Gary Farber with CL King. Please go ahead. Gary Farber – CL King & Associates: Yeah, thanks. Can you comment on just as you moved through each month in the quarter, sort of how you saw things in North America and China? I mean, did North America strengthen during the quarter? Were the growth rates relatively stable? And then if possible, just comment on your customer base – just the order patterns, do you see some degree of caution in different geographies, or do you see sort of full-out conviction, really?

I’ll start – this is Bill, and maybe Jim will add something. I think in terms of—we don’t comment specifically month-to-month by quarter, but just to sort of give you a flavor, in North America I don’t think we saw any change in the trends from month to month during our third quarter. We talked earlier about the gas turbine, which is lumpy, but I’m talking about the rest of our markets, I would say the ones where we can connect the dots for a trend. We didn’t see any change during the quarter in North America. I think in China what we’ve seen over maybe the past two quarters was sort of a steady improvement coming out of—you know, into this new calendar year and sort of coming out of Chinese New Year. I think maybe China generally, the economy there is recovering slower than most people expected, but it is recovering and we’ve seen that continue. We expect it to further continue. Gary Farber – CL King & Associates: Great, and that’s sort of, you would say—I mean, it’s a short period of time but you had a bunch of data points come out yesterday, that’s sort of continued into May as well, you would say? No real change to what you’ve just said?

No, we watch it closely and a lot of it—you know industry reports, but especially feedback from customers, and I think we haven’t seen any changes. I mean, the only area that’s maybe changed over the last two quarters is Europe, okay? We talked about that, with southern Europe going back into recession and northern Europe slowing down, but I think we covered that in our comments.

Yeah, this is Jim. I think with Europe, we haven’t seen any changes since the quarter—you know, going forward, but just like everybody, we’re watching what impact the turmoil there will have but we haven’t seen anything to this point.

I think all of our customers are very cautious and so are we. There isn’t a tremendous amount of visibility in terms of forward-looking. We work with our order backlog, but that really only covers about half of our business because a lot of our orders come in and are shipped out the same day. But a lot of the OEM production platforms, we do have some more visibility and we track that. We know our customers are being very careful about how far they place orders. Gary Farber- CL King & Associates: And that’s been pretty much the story or the trend for much of the recovery, you would say?

I would say from the middle of the recession or the start of the recession through the recovery. Maybe this time last year, people were a little bit more optimistic a little bit longer term, but now with so many elections this year in so many different countries and so many economic questions swirling around, I think people are generally more cautious, as are we, and I think we should be. Gary Farber – CL King & Associates: Right. Okay, thanks for all your help.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if there are any additional questions, please press the star followed by the one at this time, and if you are using speaker equipment, please lift the handset before making your selection. The next question is from the line of Richard Eastman with Robert W. Baird. Please go ahead. Richard Eastman – Robert W. Baird: Yes, good morning. Bill, just to carry that theme in one more question here on Europe, in particular on the IFS business, do you have any sense that the back half of this calendar year might reflect the declining PMI in Europe? I mean, generally your IFS business has a bit of a backlog – you know, a quarter or two. Have you seen any slowdown in the backlog or order flow in the last quarter?

Rick – Bill. We have. I mean, our IFS business, the first fit, the new system part of that is sort of a mid-cycle, okay? The replacement parts are maybe earlier, but on the equipment side of that we have seen some slowdown over the past few months in Europe, and that’s related to the general—what we talked about with the slower growth in northern Europe and a bunch of the southern Europe economies entering a recession. So we have seen that and we have factored that into our guidance. Richard Eastman – Robert W. Baird: For the fourth quarter.

For the fourth quarter. Now, we’re putting our plans together for next year now, and so it wouldn’t be appropriate for me to try and guess yet until we get the numbers together in terms of what we see in the back half of this calendar year, which would be the first half of our new fiscal year. Richard Eastman – Robert W. Baird: Yes, okay. And then just one question – can you just give us what China sales were in the quarter? I know you addressed a little bit of the truck exposure, but I was curious what the China sales number was.

Rick, they were 43 million. Richard Eastman – Robert W. Baird: Oh, okay. So that’s a nice sequential improvement from the second, then, without question.

Yes, it is. Richard Eastman – Robert W. Baird: Yeah. And then Bill, I just wanted to get a couple comments – the engine liquid business, I know you’ve introduced the diesel fuel filters. Is there a segment of your engine products business that maybe are the earlier adopters of the early platforms? I mean, is it off-road or on-road, or does that product appeal to any class of vehicle first?

Rick, this is Bill. I would say our primary target is off-road, okay, (inaudible) ag and construction equipment for that technology. We’re looking at other end markets as well, but primarily off-road. Richard Eastman – Robert W. Baird: Okay, all right. And then just one last question – the other income number, I’m curious, continues to work higher. Is that being influenced by a PowerCore royalty, or what’s influencing that number?

Rick, this is Rich. The two biggest driving factors that we’ve got going right now – one is we’ve got some higher interest income in the mix, and also we’ve seen foreign exchange gains in the other income line where last year as the dollar weakened we had losses there. That’s really the offset on our hedging of our (inaudible). Richard Eastman – Robert W. Baird: Okay. Okay, great. Thank you. Very nice quarter.

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Lawrence Alexander with Jefferies & Company. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is Rob Walker on for Lawrence. I guess on the next generation of PowerCore, can you give us some sense of scale for how much share you’ve gained on the OEM platforms? Obviously they’ll roll it over time, but if you have to benchmark it—for example, if they were all commercial today, do you think your OEM product sales would be up 1%, 5%, or 30%?

That’s a good question, Rob. I’m going to comment sort of qualitatively and stay away from quantitatively. I think on the OEM side on PowerCore, we were in a leadership position on first fit air filtration before so in many cases on OEM first fit, we are replacing ourselves but we are also picking up market share on some platforms that we didn’t have before. I would say the bigger upside for us is in the aftermarket, so by putting PowerCore or other proprietary technologies that we have, because we have others in addition to PowerCore but we use PowerCore as one of our—we talk about that as sort of one of our key performance indicators with folks like you. The big upside is in the aftermarket, so we can take where we and our customers might be getting 30% share of the replacement filters to 100% per period of time. So it’s a big—the bigger upside is on the aftermarket for us, but we are winning some new first fit platforms as well on the engine side. And the same comments go in dust collection on our industrial side, although on dust collection we’re actually able to participate in some new end markets that we weren’t very strong. So the industrial side is both first fit share gains and aftermarket. Rob Walker – Jefferies: Okay, thanks. And then I guess can you sketch out your contingency plans around European exposure in case that economy were to slow down more sharply; and likewise in China, would the strategy be to cut regional exposure or invest through a potential downturn? I know you mentioned your liquids facility in China. Thank you.

Yeah Rob, this is Bill again. You know, I think we had a pretty good live exercise on having to go through a downturn a couple of years ago, and I think we did okay or maybe even better than okay, and I think we learned a lot from it which we are incorporating into our contingency plans going forward. One of the things that I think we did pretty good the last time and that we will continue to do is that we really focused on prioritizing to make sure that we didn’t shut everything off for the long term. So we continued to make key strategic investments through the recession, not as many as we had planned before we went into the recession, but we continued with a number of them, including capital projects, because we knew we would need them when we came out of the recession. And we were right – we did. So we would prioritize the projects by region and manage our short-term exposure while investing for the long term on key projects. Rob Walker – Jefferies: All right. Thank you very much.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the conference back over to Bill Cook for any closing remarks.

Thanks, Alicia. Now just to conclude our call, first I’d like to thank everyone for your time and continued interest in our company. I’d like to specially thank my 13,300 colleagues for their efforts and contributions in creating these wonderful results and what we delivered in the third quarter. This quarter clearly demonstrates further significant progress in our execution of our strategic growth plan and reinforces our objectives of building our company into first a 3 billion and then a $5 billion filter company. Thank you all and have a great weekend. Goodbye.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude the conference call. If you’d like to listen to a replay of today’s conference, please dial 1-800-406-7325 or 303-590-3030 and enter in the access code of 4534970. Thank for your participation. You may now disconnect.