Good morning. My name is Suzanne and I will be your conference operator today. At this time I would like to welcome everyone to the Donaldson's Second Quarter FY '16 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Mr. Brad Pogalz, Director of Investor Relations, you may begin your conference.

Thanks, Suzanne. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Donaldson's second quarter 2016 earnings conference call. With me is Tod Carpenter, Donaldson's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Scott Robinson, Chief Financial Officer. This morning, Tod and Scott will discuss second quarter performance, review the outlook for FY '16 and provide an update on some of Donaldson's strategic initiatives. Before turning the call to Tod, I have two housekeeping items to cover. I want to first remind all of you that we chose to revise our previously-issued quarterly financial statements for FY '15 in our most recent 10-K. The revision appropriately recognizes the gas turbine systems revenue in each period last year. Additional details related to this revision can be found in note O of the 10-K. I also want to remind anyone that any forward-looking statements made during this call are subject to risks and uncertainties, the most important of which are described in our press release and SEC filings. Now I'll turn the call over to Tod Carpenter. Tod?

Thanks, Brad. Good morning, everyone. I want to begin by welcoming Scott Robinson to Donaldson. He joined as our new CFO in December so today is his first earnings call with us. I'm very excited to have him on the team. Adding his skills and experience strengthen us as we continue to navigate the challenges presented by uneven demand across the globe. Welcome, Scott. Turning to our performance, uneven demand persisted through second quarter. The recent market volatility and global economic uncertainty was punctuated by the dour outlooks provided by some of our largest customers over the past several weeks. Given market conditions, we continue to proactively seek opportunities to enhance operational efficiencies and take cost out of the business. Our goal is to protect bottom-line performance where we can but we also recognize the importance of striking a balance between cost savings and investments in the future. I'll share more on that later in the call. Turning to our second quarter top-line results, total sales declined about 12% to $517 million which was below our expectations for the quarter. Our GTS business was the single largest contributor to this variance. In Q2, we experienced a 40% sales decline from last year but we did expect sales to decline as we compared against a 65% increase in the second quarter last year. The shortfall in sales was primarily driven by a higher rate of customer delivery deferrals as of their sites were not yet ready to accept our equipment. Given the challenges facing GTS over the past couple of quarters, we're taking a hard look at how we approach of this business. To be clear, this does not include the possibility of that exiting this business. In the near term, macro headwinds like the oil & gas slowdown and economic…

Thanks, Tod. I'm really glad to be here this morning and I look forward to interacting with many of you over time. After having spent most of my career in Minnesota, I was familiar with Donaldson before joining the Company. This Company has built a reputation for consistently delivering strong performance over a very, very long period of time and I'm proud to join this management team as we work to continue that trend. Since joining in December, I have been building my understanding of the business while developing my set of priorities for the future. While I can't commit to being able to answer all of your questions today, I will plan to cover some of these priorities during my remarks. With that, I'll turn now to our second quarter performance. Foreign currency translation was once again a significant component of the year-over-year sales decline. Total sales were reduced by 4.5% and the FX impact was about $2 million more than we forecast. Given the volatility within our basket of currencies, I want to provide a little more context. The euro, yen and Chinese yuan represent Donaldson's largest currency exposure outside the U.S. dollar. But the dramatic movements happening in currencies where we're less exposed are having an outsized impact on results. For example, in the second quarter, the value of the Brazilian real declined by almost 40% and the South African rand was down nearly 25%. We transacted about 2% of our sales in these currencies but the volatility accounted for almost 20% of the total FX impact. I'll talk more later about how this affects the full year. Dropping to the bottom line, second quarter GAAP EPS was $0.28 which includes an impact of about $0.01 from charges related to the restructuring and the GPS investigation that…

Thanks, Scott. As I said last quarter, our Company culture is one where we put our customers first, we execute to our strategy and we look to control what we can control. Given the persistent uncertainty in the end markets and the global economy, our number-one priority right now continues to be operational efficiency which includes cost reduction. I'm proud of the expense discipline we've demonstrated in second quarter and we have taken actions to further reduce our expenses, including instituting hiring freezes in certain businesses across the world and further reducing planned discretionary expenses for the second half of FY '16. To further enhance our operational efficiency we're conducting a location-by-location review to identify opportunities to flex plant expenses down. In addition to the actions we're already taking, we're looking across the Company for opportunities to take more costs out, including additional restructuring. While I have no specific plans to announce today, we're prepared to react accordingly if we identify savings opportunities at the business or geographic level. All of the actions we have been taking strike a balance between protecting operating margin without sacrificing future growth and we will continue to be thoughtful in our approach. Now I'd like to turn from how we're managing today's environment to our progress for securing future market share and growth. The most critical part of our long term success will be planting seeds for future growth which heavily relies on securing first-fit wins with our innovative technology. We continue to be very encouraged by our success in winning new programs. During the past 12 months, we have won more than 270 new engine air programs and we're winning between 75% and 80% of our self-identified must-win programs. Importantly, more than three quarters of the must-win program so we have been awarded…

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Kevin Maczka of BB&T Capital Markets. Your line is open.

I'm wondering if we can start on revisiting your comments on the EBIT margin guidance and the big second-half that is embedded there. We've got, I think, $30 million of incremental restructuring cost take-outs. You have got your normal continuous improvements. You're contemplating now further discretionary spends and hopefully there will be volume leverage. Can we revisit all these puts and takes? Because again, it seems like an awfully big step-up to assume maybe 300 bps or more sequential in the second half versus the first.

I'll start and then I'll probably get some help for my colleagues here. There's several things impacting our guidance going forward. The first one I would say is, we do expect increased volume in the second half of the year as compared to the first half of the year. So, we expect an improvement of 11% over the first half and we certainly leverage that volume into increased profitability. We do have the benefits of our prior cost savings initiatives that you mentioned. And we've done our best to bake those all into the guidance going forward.

The other thing, when you think about our expenses for the back half, the second quarter expense dollars is a fair run-rate for the back half of the year versus our forecast. So, of course, to Scott's point, we get leverage on the sales increase. And then to some extent the gross margin improvement comes from leveraging against the sales where, if you remember last year at this time, sales were dropping off faster than we were able to catch with cost. So we expect to increase on top of that where it was depressed in the back half.

How much of the $30 million has already been realized in the first half of the year that would be in the second half run-rate versus new savings that are yet to come?

It's probably more of an even split. Again, this is Brad. If we look at the restructuring, it started about one year ago, third quarter last year. So we're starting to lap some of the good news but it wasn't much in FY '15. And then with the first quarter announcement of additional restructuring, I would say that the second and third quarter of this fiscal year are going to be the peak benefits, in the double-digits of millions. And then it will start to tail off a little bit into fourth quarter as we lap the savings.

And if I could just ask one more. Your gas turbine comments were helpful but your comment about being more selective going forward, what kind of top-line implications does that have? How should we interpret that? Does that mean you plan to walk away from some business you previously would have accepted that maybe has become problematic? Or how should be view that comment?

The way to look at this fiscal year is those comments really have no effect to what our guidance is. That's all baked in. We have those projects clearly on our books and we will continue to execute those. Where that comment really plays is as we give future guidance for next year, as we become more selective with the projects.

Right. But you've got, it sounds like, price sensitivity as an issue here. Maybe you have some customers that are getting more aggressive on that front, I'm not sure. But then being more selective and walking away, in future years, that would imply that you're not going to have the same top-line outlook that you otherwise would have.

No, it's a growing market across the world because gas turbine, the longer term outlook, is very positive. We definitely, in this particular environment, have a price sensitivity, there's no question. But as we look longer term and draw that line, if you will, over a period of years, we have moderated definitely our growth rates. But we look to improve our mix and therefore the profitability and really make sure that we can focus hard on the after-market aspect of that rather than just always take one-off first fit projects.

Your next question comes from the line of Eli Lustgarten of Longbow Securities. Your line is open.

Can we talk a little bit -- during Tod 's initial commentary and the tone of the presentation, you talked about a dour outlook from several customers in the last several weeks. Can you give us some flavor, it doesn't matter who the exact customer is there, but some idea. Are we talking about was it in construction? No pick-up in the second half or down from the 5%, does Ag take a step down? Can you give us some color of what that means versus expectations? Because that was a very noticeable change.

And you heard that within Scott's remarks relative to our expectations across those markets, Eli, like Ag, construction, mining. Specifically you talked about Ag being down 10% to 20% year over year, construction down roughly 5% and mining taking another step down. It really reflects the fact that mining is stepping down after people across the world has really called bottom, at least three times prior. And you see that across our customer base. The Caterpillar recent announcement suggests now they will be down 10%, Deere 10% and it really goes across all of those off-road segments, is really what we're referring to there.

Is it a definite change from your expectation at the beginning of the year? We're not sure that those declines are enough at this particular point, particularly in the Ag. Deere's walking the numbers down is what appears to be happening. But is there a noticeable change as we turn the year or is it pretty much on the margin at this point?

The numbers I just quoted, Eli, are the same numbers we gave in the first quarter call. So there's not a huge noticeable change in the way that we're looking across our business. But we do want to call out the fact that our customers are, as you say, walking it down a bit and we're cognizant of it.

I would add to that, though, that the customer outlooks and remarks are reflective of the environment we've been living up to the point they made those remarks. So there is an element here of -- these are business environments that we have been experiencing for some time. I don't want to unintentionally signal that there's a big change in stance by the comment that Tod made about dour outlooks as much as it's reflective of what we've been living.

Can we talk a little bit about what's happening in pricing across the industry? Or how much is pricing down in the various sectors? And where are you in inventory liquidation versus what you think your customers are in inventory liquidation? The surprise revision in GDP in the fourth quarter, is that inventories weren't cut as much as people wanted them to be and it's going to affect the first half. So, can you give some idea of what's going on in pricing and what's going on in inventory, both for the Company and the customers?

Pricing overall at a macro level for the Corporation, has really not changed, Eli. As you know, we have long-standing contracts for our OEs that require price downs on an annual basis. On the after-market we control opportunities within pricing and we take those opportunities wherever we can. Certainly, in areas like Brazil and South Africa, we're currently taking pricing actions and raising pricing in order to offset the economic headwinds that we have, being an importer into those countries. We certainly are doing that, but overall, macro-level across our engine business, it's really net zero still. Some of the other businesses I didn't mention, GTS, we're seeing a more aggressive stance by our OEs on project awards. That's general about the atmosphere. From an inventory standpoint of view, we saw an inventory destocking event, I would say, clearly, in December, across our off-road channels. But it did moderate in January and I think that's where we stand at the moment.

And one final question. You talked about the new wins that you had and the billion dollars that still -- a lot of runway, but those are over the life of the contract. Is that typically over a ten-year period or a longer period? Can you give us some idea of how many years when you win wins, does this really provide increment a revenue?

It's 10 years, Eli. Yes. And many of those programs will go longer but we just metric ourself to 10 years and we cut it off there. So, the numbers that I referenced will be over 10 years. If you want to calendarize that, typically a project starts, you can see revenue two to three years out. It will peak in years three and going out to the end of its life but that's where the after-market really kicks in, as we continue to populate those first-fit vehicles out there, it kicks in pretty strongly around year four or greater.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Drab from William Blair. Your line is open.

Could we talk about the restructuring? I want to make sure that I have these numbers right. We have two phases of restructuring, one from last year that was of $35 million total and please stop me if I get off track here, with $35 million total and with $30 million incremental coming in FY '16. And then we have the second phase which began and was the actions, I think, were largely completed in the first quarter of 201. That's going to result in a $25 million in annual savings with about $18 million or three-fourths I believe you said, of that being realized in 2016. Is that all correct?

Brian, this is Brad. Yes, you have got the numbers right.

Okay. So if I think about it, first of all, in terms of year-over-year incremental savings in a quarter, this year, you've got from last year's program, $7.5 million or so per quarter. The next phase of saving, $6 million per quarter. So like $13 million or $14 million per quarter in savings. And that's correct?

You're in the ballpark on average. I would say the nuances -- you take the $30 million and remember that's ratable over the first three quarters and then we start to annualize the benefits from last year. So that shrinks a little bit. And then to the point you made, the first round was essentially done at the end of the first quarter. So that's through the three quarters of this fiscal year, but you're in the ballpark.

The second phase, that was completed essentially at the end of the first quarter, so the incremental $6 million per quarter, did we get that $6 million per quarter in the second quarter?

Yes, a lot of it was related to headcount reduction, so I think that we were definitely in that ballpark. To be perfectly fair, there were certain actions that may be completed in week two or week three of November or things like that. But by and large, we were done by the end of the first month of the quarter.

Okay. I'm just wondering then, as I look at the SG&A line, in the first quarter 2016 it was $112.5 million, these are adjusted numbers. Then it stepped up to the second quarter, $115.5 million. I'm trying to reconcile that step-up in SG&A sequentially with the incremental $6 million in cost savings. And then also, sub-question to this one is, Brad, you mentioned this SG&A level is a reasonable expectation in terms of absolute dollars for the balance of the year. First of all, why wasn't that lower in the second quarter? What number are you talking about when you say that it's a reasonable expectation for the balance of the year?

I was talking about second quarter. I'd have to check your adjusting math just to make sure we're talking about apples to apples. Because of course there were a lot of charges in both this year and the last fiscal year, but one point on second quarter is that we typically do our option expense in second quarter and that's true every year. So if you're looking at run-rate from first to second quarter, that jumps up by a few million dollars this year.

Yes, okay. I didn't know was option-related. I wanted to see if there any other moving parts. So that's a few million in options?

That's correct.

Okay. And I wanted to clarify, too, on the FX, with the dollar weakening a little bit since we heard from you in the last call in November, do I understand correct that the incremental FX headwind incorporated in the guidance is really driven by non-euro-dollar rates and that's offsetting maybe even a slight tailwind related to the euro-dollar?

Yes, that is correct.

Okay.

And the yen as well, slight tailwind.

Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Paige of Gabelli & Company. Your line is open.

Could you provide any additional color regarding the slowdown that you're seeing in heavy duty on-road orders?

At this point, in the on-road sector, we have not seen a marketable slowdown. You see an increase year-over-year through the first half for us. We're up 6%, we have however, baked into our guidance an expected downturn in the second half within on-road.

Okay. We're now about a third of the way through third quarter. Could you speak to any the trends that you're seeing now compared to where they were exiting the second quarter?

We're only one month through our second quarter. Our fiscal, remember, is July. So February would be the first month and we don't have any comment on that at this point.

Your next question comes from the line of Charlie Brady of SunTrust. Your line is open.

I want to talk about -- make sure I heard you correct. You're expecting an 11% sequential increase in revenue, Q3 over Q2?

That is correct.

Second half versus first half.

Sorry, second half versus first half, okay. Could you get more granular on what your expectation would be between the two segments? I'm trying to understand, it seems your full-year guidance versus your second-half guidance -- how that's really breaking out because the after-market continues to slip and particularly on the engine side it sounds as though that market continues to weaken and gas turbine now is a bit softer. Is industrial filtration getting a little bit better or leveling off sooner than you thought it was?

Gas turbines, we're actually forecasting to be up in the second half and that's contributing to the sequential increase. With regard to the engine businesses, recall last year, we were lapping a pretty sharp decline that began in the third quarter and continued into the fourth quarter. So to some extent, this is a year-over-year compare. The industrial filtration, since you brought that up specifically, I would add that we said low single-digit declines and we made the comment in the remarks that we're generally in line, in the industrial businesses, with prior guidance. The biggest change there was GTS-related.

Okay, all right. Sorry, were you going to say something else?

No.

Can you talk about the commercial aerospace as that mix of defense? What up-ticks are you seeing in that part of that business?

More of a flat business is what we projected throughout the balance of the year. The reason that you have down in the first half is, we had ground-based vehicle in the defense side, had a spares order that was rather large last year. That is not in our first half this year and that's the reason why you get that down-tick. As we look forward, we have the business flat for the year.

Your next question comes from the line of Richard Eastman from Robert W. Baird. Your line is open.

A couple things I wanted to try to clarify. In the guidance on the engine mobile side of the business, actually on the industrial side of the business, your guidance is core growth of minus 3% to minus 1%. You have got IFS low single-digits, you got special apps down low single-digits and you got gas turbine down 20% to 25%. How does that actually weight out to that number? Or are you basically looking at -- is your guidance against the reported sales number?

The down 1% to down 3% is local currency. So there is a mixed within. GTS last year was just under $190 million, special apps is something south of that, $160 million, $170 million. Our IFS business is clearly the biggest one.

That's in reported dollars then?

I'm sorry, I misunderstood. Yes, the comments are in dollars, not in local currency. I apologize, Rick, sorry.

Okay. And the same holds true. When you made your gas turbine comment about the second half is up over the first half but the second half can't possibly be up year over year. Correct in gas turbine?

Correct.

Correct. Your reference was to the 11% sequential improvement in the second half over the first half. But gas turbine will be solidly down year over year in the second half.

Yes.

Okay. Tod, when you look at the overall business and I think everyone on the call understands that you're planning horizons pretty short with the nature of your business -- but what is your sense when you look at the segments in the business or even just engine mobile versus industrial which of these businesses do you feel bottoms first? What are you looking at as maybe an early indicator that we can start to see some growth in our business when we look out 6 to 12 months from where we're at today?

Rick, the way I look at this is, the early indicator will come that we've bottomed in our after-market businesses. You'll start to see platform utilization across our markets improve. Our after-market business will stabilize and then start to pick up. That in turn will then give confidence to the OEs to start to increase production. So, I really look for the after-market segments across Donaldson Company to be the first early indicator that we've turned the corner.

I see, okay. And then, one last question. Geographically in the quarter disregarding FX and the surprise there on the op profit side, any of the geographies surprise you in the fiscal second quarter year over year on the negative side? Or positive side?

I would say the surprise for us would probably be South Africa. The pullback in South Africa was pretty strong and the behavioral characteristics changed within that geography to the negative rather rapidly. Beyond that, I would say not really.

And South Africa is exposed more on the engine mobile side?

That's correct. Specifically into the mining sectors.

And your next question comes from the line of Brian Drab of William Blair. Your line is open.

First, let me ask one, Rick was just asking about gas turbine seeing solidly down year over year. I don't know if we're just rebuilding the model here now but the midpoint of your guidance suggests, I think, about $88 million in gas turbine in the second half of the year. And you did $92 million in the second half of last year.

You are in the ballpark on this year. This is Brad. I would say that last year, don't forget that we had the revision so the last year comparison reflects the movement of some gas turbine revenue from second quarter of FY '15, largely into third quarter but also a little bit into fourth quarter of FY '15.

You raised your back half guidance?

Yes, as a baseline, correct. So when we said down 20% to 25% that reflects the restated LOI [ph].

Okay. That just didn't feel like solidly down, right, if you're down $4 million. At the midpoint of your guidance, 22.5% down year over year, that translates to down just a few million for second-half over second half. We're down, you'll have to move $8.4 million into the second half but you'll have to decide what solidly means. Okay. I'll look at those adjustments.

I mean, we're down

Okay, I got to review the moving parts, I guess. And then on that second phase of restructuring that you implemented in the first quarter of this year, have you told us what the breakdown between what's coming out of COGS and was coming out of SG&A is?

What was the first part?

How do you break down the cost savings, this $25 million annual cost savings that you're driving with the actions in the first quarter? How do you break that down between cost savings within cost of goods sold and within SG&A?

We haven't precisely provided that, Brian.

Even roughly, you can't give us a sense?

Well, it's in our guidance. The run-rate of that I gave you for the back half of this fiscal year, if you look at the year-over-year improvement in the back half, about half of it's coming from gross margin and about half of it's from OpEx.

[Operator Instructions]. Your next question comes from Larry Pfeffer at Avondale Partners. Your line is open.

Just looking at the sequential trends again into the second half of the fiscal year, on a local currency basis, are you looking at after-market engine being up year over year in the fourth quarter?

Sorry, what was that?

Yes. Looking at the implied guidance for after-market engine and getting into the fourth quarter, would you expect local currency to be up year over year?

Yes. I think it would be in the ballpark. Again, we haven't provided precise segment-level guidance but obviously we're comparing against a pretty sharp drop last year both in FX and dollars.

Right. And so, if you were to look at it by end market right now, looking at the comparables in on-road and with the different segments in off-road, how do those pieces trend as we move from the second quarter into the back half? Are you seeing less negative rates in off-road after-market at this point and that's what's giving you more confidence that you're going to get that improvement?

Yes. Off-road and after-market will see more sequential improvement. But I do want to point out that the seasonality that we saw last year between first half and back half, the year was split almost 50-50 across the total business which is very, very, very unusual for our normal seasonality. In fact, you'd have to go back to the recession before you find another split like that. So, to some extent the after-market and the OE forecast that we had in guidance are reflecting a normal seasonality and then obviously the compare is a bit noisy as well.

Changing gears a little bit, the acquisition front -- I know we haven't touched on at all on this call, how the pipeline looks at this point and what you're guys' strategic plans are into the back half of fiscal year and into 2017.

Industrias Partmo, as we had commented, is in flight and we have announced that. We look to close that in the fourth quarter of this fiscal year. Beyond that, we continue to focus on acquisitions with the pipeline. I would characterize our pipeline as robust, strategic, however selective and making sure that we will continue to remain disciplined in our approach. The metrics that we use for that discipline are an acquisition adding to the Company would be accretive in year two and we have a target of 15% ROI by year 5. There is no change in our behavior on the acquisition front.

There are no more questions in the queue at this time. I turn the call back to the presenters.

That concludes today's call. I want to thank everyone for their time and interest in Donaldson Company. I also want to thank our employees for what they do every day to support our customers. Thank you and goodbye.

And this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.