Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to Ducommun Second Quarter Earnings 2019 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I’d now like to turn the conference over to your host Mr. Chris Witty you may begin.

Thank you and welcome to Ducommun’s 2019 second quarter conference call. With me today are Steve Oswald, Chairman, President and CEO; and Chris Wampler, Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. I’m going to discuss certain limitations to any forward-looking statements regarding future events, projections or performance that we may make during the prepared remarks or the Q&A session that follows. Certain statements today that are not historical facts, including any statements as to future market conditions, results of operations and financial projections are forward-looking statements under the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and therefore are prospective. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from the future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurances to such expectations will prove to be correct. In addition, estimates of future operating results are based on the company’s current business, which is subject to change. Particular risks facing Ducommun include, among others, the cyclicality of our end-use markets, the level of US government defense spending, legal and regulatory risks, management changes, the cost of expansion and acquisitions, and competitions. These risks and others are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and our forward-looking statements are subject to those risks. Statements made during this call are only as of the time made and we do not intend to update any statements made in this presentation or call except if and as required by regulatory authorities. This call also includes non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our filings with the SEC for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures referenced on this call to the most similar GAAP measures. We filed our Form 10-Q with the SEC today and you will find a link to all our filings on the company’s website under the Investor Relations tab. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Steve Oswald for a review of the operating results. Steve?

Thanks you Chris and thanks everyone who is joining us today for our second quarter conference call. As usual I’ll begin by providing an update on recent developments of the company, after which Chris Wampler our Interim CFO will review our financial results in detail. Second quarter was another one of accomplishments for Ducommun as we continued to benefit from strong business execution, growth on key platforms, a diversified customer base and robust product demand. Revenue grew an impressive 16.6% year-over-year to $180.5 million driven by higher shipment across a variety of large, narrow body platform such as the Boeing 737 MAX, Airbus A320 family as well as JSF, Raytheon missile platforms and the Apache helicopter program. Revenue related to the 737 MAX rose at a substantially higher rate year-over-year reflecting the current build rates of 52 per month at Spirit AeroSystems and 42 per month at Boeing. Well Boeing works to address the 737 MAX situation. We continue to communicate with them and are operationally ready to increase production if and when required. For Ducommun, with strong momentum and revenue and backlog across a variety amounts of customers. We do not expect any material issues to our top line view of 7% to 9% growth across our commercial aerospace and military platforms for the rest of 2019. For the second quarter operating income was substantially increase on adjusted basis by 23.7% from the prior year. Gross margins also rose again this quarter to 21.1% compared to 20.7% last year while Ducommun’s operating margin was significantly higher by 390 basis points year-over-year to 7.5%. We posted as well $22.4 million adjusted EBITDA for the quarter and increased nearly 20% over the comparable period in 2018. This performance was driven by our structured segments, due to higher overall production rates, scale…

Thank you, Steve and good day, everyone. As a reminder please see the company’s filings and today’s press release for further description of matters under discussion during the call. I’ll begin with details of our overall results. Revenue for the second quarter of 2019 was $180.5 million versus $154.8 million in the second quarter of 2018. This performance includes $20.1 million of higher revenue with our commercial aerospace customers due to increased shipments for key narrow body platforms such as the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 as Steve mentioned. And $6.9 million of greater sales in the military and space sector primarily reflecting strong demand for various military programs. Ducommun’s overall backlog was approximately $853 million as of June 29 down from last quarter’s record amount. As a reminder, the company defined backlog as potential revenue and is based on the customer placed purchase orders and long-term agreements with firm fixed prices and expected delivery dates of 24 months or less. Moving to gross profit, our gross margin was 21.1% in the second quarter versus 20.7% in the prior year’s comparable period. The increase year-over-year was primarily due to favorable manufacturing volumes and favorable product mix along with many streamlining measures taken last year as previously discussed. SG&A was $24.5 million in the second quarter versus $21.2 million in 2018. With the increase primarily reflecting one-time severance charges in higher compensation of benefit cost. The company report operating income for the second quarter of $13.6 million or 7.5% of revenue compared to $5.6 million or 3.6% of revenue in the prior year period. The year-over-year improvement was due to higher revenue and gross profit as well as the impact of $5.4 million in lower restructuring charges partially offset by higher SG&A expense. On an adjusted basis in the second quarter…

Okay, thanks Chris. Okay so looking to the rest of the years mentioned earlier, we continue to be optimistic about our revenue growth, our solid margins and backlog. I believe is in very good shape with strong momentum so we always like to see in both revenues and earnings. Ducommun’s innovative technology and the value we provide along with our strong relationships as I mentioned earlier with Boeing, Raytheon, Airbus, Gulfstream and many others in Aerospace defense I think positions us well now and, in the years, ahead. Before we go to questions. I do want to also mention that August is a month we recognize the founding of Ducommun and we’re very happy to be celebrating the 170th year of the company which started in 1849 in California. Ducommun is proud to be – recognized as the oldest company in the State. We look forward to many great years and decades ahead. So, with that operator we’ll now open up the call for questions. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] we have your first question coming from Edward Marshall with Sidoti & Company. Your line is now live.

So, you had some pretty good color on 737 MAX you talked about no material issues for the balance of 2019 and as I look through the platform, you talked about your key customer there. There seem to be some rationalization of cost on their 2Q call that they talked about. What are your contingency plans in the event that, production continues to vain here or at the worst-case scenario to stop briefly and then ultimately, when you look at the platform longer term? How do you think about the growth rate there? I imagine it eventually gets flattened out for a while before it reaccelerates. Thanks.

Yes, sure no problem. So, first, we’re obviously locked in with Spirit its pretty much half of our volume at 52 and then as I mentioned Boeing at 42. The one nice thing about Ducommun is, I think we’re the right size if we really nimble, we do have to make some changes if there’s anything that’s going to be happening down the road. We certainly are ready to – we’re very close to Boeing and as I mentioned earlier, we’re very close to the situation and we’re certainly hopeful but we’ll be ready if we have to make some changes the one way or the other. As far as the platform, the nice thing about us and I mean just talking about structures in general. We’re getting more diversified as we go. Okay, so we might see some flattening, if the MAX takes a little more time and might have a little bit of lift there but we were – we’ve got a really good growing business there. But we’ve had the Gulfstream business – down the road we’re going to hopefully pick up some structures business at Raytheon’s. So, I think you know we’ve got a lot of diversification that I think is going to help.

Okay with that in context. If you look at 7% to 9% rate that you’re looking at for commercials and within structures. Do you think as we move into 2020 without a rate increase you could see that on the lower end or would it fall short of that range?

We feel like I said very confident about 7% to 9% as usual, when we think about our following year, right now we’re mid-single.

Mid-single got it. And then if you think about, if I look at the incremental margins within structures. They’ve been running in the 30s to 40s on the [indiscernible] dropped down to 22 in this particular quarter. I’m wondering has the majority of the increases kind of passed or what are the next leverage that you’re seeing on the margin side. I mean obviously you had a very good margin quarter and the comps are starting to get tougher and tougher. So can you talk about maybe what’s left in the tank and what leverage you can pull without kind of thinking about acquisitions and what that might bring to the business overall.

Yes, I know and couple things. I think first off, we’re still on the journey with all the different facilities of fine tuning and finding incremental improvements within. So as some of these newer platforms are taken hold, some that we’ve been building up over the last several quarters a couple more that we’re taking up to rate over the next few quarters, that’s going to continue to be a little bit of a lift there and then again, you mentioned the volume impact too is going to be another key piece of the puzzle, so it’s all that against with sort of the item that Steve alluded to with 737, so that’s how we feel comfortable with sort of how we’re operating now and continuing just to make inroads as we move forward.

Got it. And then finally I guess when it would be silly of us not to talk about Raytheon. It sounds like can you talk about and frame up; it sounds like to me, this is an opportunity to kind of bid on new business or does it come with extra content on existing programs or new programs, kind of maybe elaborate just a little bit. Thanks.

Yes. I think it’s all of the above – one thing to make note of, is we’re the first ones they signed, right? So they got RMS’s [ph] is what an $8 billion or $10 billion revenue company so we’re really proud of that, that we’re the first ones out of the gate. It’s going to be for new, it’s going to be for existing, it’s their whole portfolio we’re excited because we do pretty heavy things with them in electronics. But this new opportunities you open up some structures business we hope, right? So we’re working on that for some of the SM missiles, standard missiles so more to come there.

Great. Thanks guys appreciated.

Thank you. We have your next question coming from Mike Crawford with B. Riley. Your line is now live. Q –Mike Crawford: Steve, when you talked about hopefully picking up some structures business with Raytheon. Can you – would that be VersaCore primarily and also, can you just maybe differentiate what you’ve been doing with the mix of electronics versus structures with Raytheon today versus what it might be in the future?

Yes, so maybe I’ll get to the second one, first. Pretty much on the structure side Raytheon is pretty much zero. So looking back it really, really no action. There’s mostly all circuit cards, connectors, boxes, that type of thing. So we’re excited about that. It could very well be VersaCore, we do a lot of work up in New York, tachyon [ph] things in [indiscernible] and different blendings [ph] of metal and that type of thing. So we think that we’re in pretty good shape there going forward hopefully we’re going to build some of that business. Q –Mike Crawford: Okay, thanks and then. VersaCore, the revenues to-date from that product have been about how much and maybe if you could just gage what level of revenue you think you might see from that this year versus year next year into the future?

Yes, so we’re – this is sort of top level on rough. But we’re running for that program with VersaCore right around $5 million this year and that’s going to roughly double next year and then [indiscernible] so we’ve got – I think we’ve got some nice things setting up for 2020, Mike. Q –Mike Crawford: Okay, great and then last question is, I know you had the favorable manufacturing mix – the help in gross margin this quarter but based on general outlook and assuming that the 737 Max kind of resolves itself in the next six months. How much variance would you expect around that gross margin number quarter-to-quarter?

As we move, as I mentioned as we move forward. I think it will continue to strengthen but no huge step function. It’s going to be continued work in making each location a little better and again getting some of the goodness that happens with the increased volume. So we’re expecting a longer period to be able to keep it moving in the right direction. But as we work through the second half of this year, we expect – we were running at a pretty strong level. We had our highest compare to prior year in Q2 and we build upon that compare and we’re looking to do that and more in the next couple of quarters. Q –Mike Crawford: Well Chris just, let me just continue on that.

Sure. Q –Mike Crawford: Because the gross margin is higher than we’ve had in our model and yet, maybe if you had, maybe a less favorable manufacturing mix like how much, how many basis points was it like, are we talking like 100 or few hundred that it could actually dip down the other way, with the [indiscernible] mix?

Yes, I mean if things go against this. I think we’re talking a range now of sort of 100, that’s.

Mike, I think that.

We’re moving in the right direction.

Mike, I think it’s minimal. I think to be honest with you. I see more runway in the future for structures margins, [indiscernible] on this point. Q –Mike Crawford: All right, awesome. Thank you.

Thank you and we have your next question coming from Michael Ciarmoli with SunTrust. Your line is now live. Q –Michael Ciarmoli: Steve just on the Raytheon supplier agreement. Can you give maybe a little bit more I mean obviously you’ve been a big supplier to them? But was there more of a push sort of with the DOD looking to shore up their defense electronics supply chains and go all domestic, would that factor in anything behind the supplier agreement?

Yes, it’s a real good question. I can’t answer that. I feel like, what my view would be is that. Raytheon is really looking to get to the next level of suppliers and looking to find people they can work with, that can really provide value but also provide a big time portfolio, right? [Indiscernible] next level, can’t give you any insight of the DOD. But good question. Q –Michael Ciarmoli: Got it. What about even with – in the context of Raytheon, maybe there’s definitely some scrutiny around this merger with United Technologies. I mean how do you guys view that because certainly I think the perception is, there’s not going to be a lot of internal synergies. I mean optically does it create more opportunities for you. I mean I’m sure, [indiscernible] still very early but what would be in the [indiscernible] there?

I think certainly in the game, as you know more close to next year. Obviously, Tom Kenneth [ph] will be with the company right for a while too, so on the defense side. But I would say that, we do have Raytheon, we do have aerospace. So I feel like over the long-term we’re hopeful, that’s what I would say at this point. Q –Michael Ciarmoli: Okay and then structural, just back to the margins 12.9% operating margin. I think certainly a multi-year high there. Hard to tell, I mean MAX, if you don’t get any increased volume or if you stay at these lower levels I mean, do you think you can hold these margins here. I mean certainly it sounds like one of your big customer Spirit it looks like they’re going to be staying 52 all of next year regardless. I’m not sure what’s going to change on the Boeing side from what they complete at. But how are you guys thinking about to maybe the sensitivity on margins given some of these unknowns to the MAX.

Just alluding back to what Steve said earlier in the call. Our size and the number of various products that we have sort of in play that we can move around and sort of make work for are model in a given facility in a given month, gives us a lot of ability I think to manage through. They’ve gone through one quarter sort of this uncertainty we manage through in a pretty strong fashion. We look forward to next couple of quarters and feel like we’ve got ability to manage through again to any ebb and flow that sort of comes through from them.

So, Steve, I might also say, we’re also as I mentioned in the calls in the past and the last couple of years are really starting to build our business with Airbus, we’ve got the G500, G600 going up okay. We’ve got – believe it or not we’ve got 767, 87 business, 777 – everything is obviously we have concerns in this variability possibly with the 37. Spirits’ have to book and then we’ve got these other platforms. Overall, we feel good Mike. Q –Michael Ciarmoli: Got it. Perfect. Thanks a lot guys.

[Operator Instructions] your next question comes from Austin Moore [ph] with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is now live.

Hi, guys this is Austin on for Ken.

Hi Austin.

Hi Austin.

So I just wanted to expand a little more on the – your relationship with Raytheon. So I was wondering what the growth profile looks for you guys in missile markets and more specifically missile defense sales given your work and content on the standard missile and what that growth profile looks like over the next few quarters for you guys?

We feel good about it. Obviously, there’s a component of Raytheon which is FMS, right? They’re just some opportunistic business that runs through RMS and you know but if you look at their recent performance, their bookings, we’re happy that we’re going to continue to grow with Raytheon, obviously this agreement is going to I think be great for us because it’s – not only going to tie all the teams together sort of working format, it’s also going to tie myself and the leadership that RMS as far as how we’re going to grow the business. So as far as numbers I’d say it’s certainly it’s going to be high single as we move forward.

Okay, great and so you guys have content on standard missile in Aegis [ph]. Do you also have any content on other missile defense systems like FAD [ph] or Patriot or just specifically standard in patent in Aegis [ph].

No we absolutely have, we have business on the Patriot, big – we have Paveway which is not a missile defense program. But it’s a big Raytheon program, JSAW and we’re working on many, many others.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thanks for joining us Austin [ph].

Thank you. I’m showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back to Mr. Steve Oswald for any closing remarks.

Okay, thank you very much. I want to thank everybody for joining us today. Thank you for your questions too. I think overall, we’re still early innings on our journey here. But you’re only pleased with the quarter. I think one thing to take note of obviously we’ve worked hard on lots of things in the last maybe four or five, six quarters that are really coming through on the margin side. But I think that really is encouraging is our growth on the top line. I think that says a lot about our position, where we are and hopefully. I’m confident where we’re going. So I’ll leave it with that. Again thank you very much and have good rest of the day or evening.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day. You may all disconnect.