Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q3 2024 Datadog Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Yuka Broderick, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you Liz. Good morning and thank you for joining us to review Datadog’s third quarter 2024 financial results, which we announced in our press release issued this morning. Joining me on the call today are Olivier Pomel, Datadog’s Co-Founder and CEO, and David Obstler, Datadog’s CFO. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements, including statements related to our future financial performance, our outlook for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2024 and related notes, our gross margins and operating margins, our product capabilities, and our ability to capitalize on market opportunities. The words anticipate, believe, continue, estimate, expect, intend, will, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or similar indications of future expectations. These statements reflect our views only as of today and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For a discussion of the material risks and other important factors that could affect our actual results, please refer to our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. Additional information will be made available in our upcoming Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2024 and other filings with the SEC. This information is also available on the Investor Relations section of our website, along with a replay of this call. We will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are reconciled to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in the tables in our earnings release, which is available at investors.datadoghq.com. With that, I’d like to turn the call over to Olivier.

Thanks Yuka and thank you all for joining us this morning. We are pleased to report an -- Q3 as we continued to execute against our goals to help our customers grow faster, safer, and more efficient as the modernized application. We kept broadening our platform in observability and beyond, including in next gen AI where interest continues to rise. And we added new customers while expanding with existing ones as they grow into the cloud. Let me start with a review of our Q3 financial performance. Revenue was $690 million, an increase of 26% year-over-year and above the high end of our guidance range. We ended the quarter with about 29,200 customers, up from about 26,800 a year ago. We had about 3,490 customers with ARR of $100,000 or more, up from about 3,130 a year ago. And these customers generated about 88% of our ARR. And we generated free cash flow of $204 million with a free cash flow margin of 30%. Turning to platform adoption, our platform strategy continues to resonate in the market. As of the end of Q3, 83% of customers were using two or more products, up from 82% a year ago. 49% of customers were using four or more products, up from 46% a year ago. 26% of our customers were using six or more products, up from 21% a year ago. And 12% of our customers were using eight or more products, up from 8% a year ago. We continue to execute on growth across the three pillars of observability and we are pleased to report that infrastructure monitoring or APM suite and log management together, represent more than $2.5 billion in ARR. As a reminder, within the APM suite, we include core APM, synthetics, real user monitoring, and continuous profiler. We…

Thanks Olivier and good morning. Q3 revenue was $690 million, up 26% year-over-year, and up 7% quarter-over-quarter. To dive into some of the drivers of our Q3 revenue growth, overall, we saw trends for usage growth from existing customers that were consistent with our expectation. We've seen conditions remain roughly stable throughout 2024, with continued movement to cloud and modern DevOps technologies, and with customers remaining cost-conscious and seeking efficiency and value from their spend. In Q3, we saw usage growth from existing customers that was higher than usage growth in the year ago quarter, as well as higher than usage growth in the prior quarter. Now, some of our growth is coming from AI native customers, who this quarter represented more than 6% of our Q3 ARR, up from more than 4% in Q2 and about 2.5% of our ARR in the year-ago quarter. AI native customers contributed about 4 percentage points of year-over-year growth in Q3 versus about 2 percentage points in the year-ago quarter. While we believe that adoption of AI will continue to benefit Datadog in the long term, we are mindful that some of the large customers in this cohort have ramped extremely rapidly, and that these customers may optimize cloud and observability usage and increase their commitments to us over time with better terms. This may create volatility in our revenue growth in future quarters on the backdrop of long-term volume growth. Now, regarding usage growth by customer size in Q3, similar to the last quarter, we saw the strongest performance among our largest customers who spent multiple millions of dollars with us annually. And as we looked at usage growth by segment, similar to recent quarters, we are seeing the strongest growth from our enterprise customers, where year-over-year growth in usage has accelerated…

Thank you, David. [Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Mark Murphy with J.P. Morgan. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much and congrats on another very healthy performance. Olivier, we noticed your AI contributions surged to about 6% this quarter. We're watching all the advances in the foundation models, including the OpenAI’s Strawberry version. We're watching the multi-step reasoning, how they're becoming multi-modal, the longer duration inference, the video models. Does it seem reasonable to you that we are on the cusp of a pretty interesting period in the next couple years for the inferencing loads and that might drive some incremental traction for Datadog that is tied to AI? Then I have a quick follow-up for David.

I mean, look, it's definitely a very interesting period to say the least. We see tons of innovation across the customer base, still largely more around experimenting and testing new applications. Though as we reported, we are seeing some customers moving to production and we are seeing production minded availability product, for example, being used by real paying customers, which is real volumes and real applications in real production workload. So that's exciting and healthy. I think it's a great trend for the future. In general, in terms of the workloads, you are right that we're starting to see more inference workloads, but they still tend to be more concentrated across a number of API driven providers. So there are a few others both on airlines and other kinds of models. So this is where I think most of the usage, in production at least is today. We expect that to diversify more over time as companies get further into production with applications and they start to be customizing more on their other models.

Okay, understood. And then David, to the extent -- and you've always said that revenue is a better indicator than billings and RPO. But to the extent that billings growth was affected by timing, as you mentioned we've seen that before, we know it can bounce around. But did you have some of the invoices that would have gone out in September and instead they were issued in October, in other words, would we see some recapture of the timing element in Q4 or perhaps in early next year or is it some other dynamic there?

Yeah, it's really some other dynamic. It's that the timing of billing for last year was slightly different than for this year. And so it was more a factor of timing for billing last year that didn't repeat this year. So, we think that the weighted average, what we talked about, the average over the 12 months is a better indicator of the relationship between billing and revenues. And when you look at that, they're much more closely aligned.

Excellent. Thank you again.

Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Sanjit Singh with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Yeah, thank you for taking the questions. Olivier, in the framework that you have laid out for the business, observe, secure, and act. I wanted to focus on the last two pillars, secure and act. When we think about how the security -- cloud security sales motion has been going this quarter versus prior quarters, any trend lines there and any sort of early indications on the uptake of some of the service management products and more of the automation features within the Datadog platform?

Yeah, so on the security side, I think we -- there's quite a bit of focus right now on the cloud scene as we see a number of very exciting opportunities there. I think, when you look at the landscape competitively with what other companies are using, because most companies have seen it already, at least for some part of their business. I think there's a very interesting opportunity for us there AND the product is mature enough to win in best of both situations across the existing products. So we are making quite a bit of a push, and we are -- we're still investing quite a bit in the rest of the platform and bringing all the products together to be a unified platform for security. But I would say the tip of the spare for this quarter next is a I think there's a very specific opportunity there. On the -- and we also have a few other product security that are coming online soon that we haven't brought to GA yet, but we think can make a big difference. In service management, we actually see very exciting trends from customers. We mentioned on the call On Call product, which puts us directly to the paging loop and the start of many incidents. The product is getting stronger reception than we initially thought to the point where customers are basically clamoring to buy even though it's still in preview. So we feel good about handling the full loop for them, starting with when we detect something in observability all the way to full incident resolution and automation is a big part of it. So we think On Call can be a bit of a watershed for us to do quite a bit more on that. So we're also excited and we're doing what we can to accelerate the roadmap there because we think there's a very good opportunity. We have a few other building blocks on the service management that we released over the past year, and they're all growing quite nicely I would say from small basis today. But we're very excited in the way they all come together to form an integrity platform where we can fully automate resolution for our customers. So that's, again, still something we're building lastly from those building blocks but something that we think is going to be very exciting in the quarter and years to come.

That's great to hear. And so one follow up, going to sort of the spending intentions from your customers, it feels like most of the past 12 to 18 months, the sales playbook, particularly in the enterprise has been around consolidation. Is that still the theme in terms of driving new bookings, new expansion deals or are you starting to see customers focused more or less about the consolidation opportunity, more about innovation and bringing their innovation budgets to bear to invest in AI and cloud and bringing Datadog along for the ride?

I mean, there's always been innovation and new things. You're right that at least for the deals we talk about in the earnings, there tends to be more consolidation, but that's the nature of it. I mean, innovation typically happens gradually as opposed to being a big bang customer switching $5 billion from five vendors into another vendor. So we talk about these less in the running but that's been happening throughout. We definitely see room for a lot more consolidation moving forward both in terms of existing customers and new logos. And at the same time we are excited to see what's happening with the AI innovation as it gets further down the pipe and away from testing and experimenting and more into production applications. And we have some signs that it's starting to happen. Again, we see that with our LLM observability product. We see that also with some of the workloads we monitor from our customers on the infrastructure side. But I would say it's still very early days in terms of customers being in production with their AI, their next-gen applications.

Great. Thank you for the thoughts, Olivier.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Hey, thank you. Congrats from me as well. Can I stay on that subject a little bit longer Olivier, if you think about the one big driver for you guys in the past was workload growth, and that's something that we are kind of all watching out for the hyperscalers as well. But it looks like there's stable trends at the hyperscalers and for you as well. Like, if you think about the puts and takes there to think that's changing, like how much of that is just plain vanilla macro and how much of that is like taking project resources away, not so much money but also time for kind of AI and it's obviously like, as you said, early in this lifecycle. Can you just -- how do you see that playing out because that's the one thing we are all watching out? Thank you.

Yeah, I mean, look, the key thing to remind everyone of is, we think the general move of workload growth in the cloud or cloud environments might be public cloud based, but they might also be private cloud. So this growth and move to the cloud is going to last for a very long time and is going to be at fairly high level for a very long time. So you are right that when we look at the numbers from the hyperscalers and when we try to factor out what's GPU driven, the growth looks stable-ish. We think that growth is still high and is going to last for a very long time and that's one of the big underpinning trends that we're going to write for in the years to come. Now on the edge of that, you are right that the -- where the workload could have grown maybe -- instead of growing 20%, they could grow 25%, maybe some of those 5% instead of being invested both in terms of a -- budget or innovation -- time innovation budget all that is going into AI. And that's largely right now in experimentation and model training and that sort of thing. That's probably that. But we see that also as a precursor to further workload growth in the future, like I would say more traditional production and application workload growth. So for us, it doesn't really change the equation. It does create a bit of a de-correlation between all numbers as a whole and the numbers you might see reported from the hyperscalers where a lot of their short term growth rides more on the capacity of GPUs they bring online for those experimentation and training workloads.

Okay, perfect. Thank you. And then one follow-up for David, like, if you think about capacity, like where are you in terms of sales capacity in case things are changing or how do you think about like increasing, maintaining capacity for as we think about the New Year? Thank you.

Yeah, we think long term our revenue, our sales capacity is highly correlated with our top line growth. And as we said, we've been attempting to increase our sales capacity similar to top line growth rates. And that has to do, as we've mentioned with bottoms up planning, putting sales capacity in areas where we see either under coverage a lot of white space, and then ramping and training our sales people. So our philosophy is to scale our sales capacity roughly in line with the top line.

Okay. Alright. Thank you.

And we see plenty of opportunity for growth, and we're like -- the plan is to, to keep growing the capacity. There are many markets, many geographies where we are under penetrated. We mentioned India on the core, it is one of them where there's tremendous opportunity and we have very little presence at this point. And in general, there's a question of what we're doing strategically, where we're going and how much we want to invest, and then tactically the question of how we execute against that plan. And it's a -- that one is a lot harder, because it's easy to say, we're going to grow the sales team by 20%, 30%, 40%. It's much harder to then have these people show up in the right region at the right time and be trained and everything else. And I would say, we are doing fairly well there. We say we probably are doing better at the end of the year than we did at the beginning of the year in terms of bringing all of our growing on sales capacity for tactical reasons. But overall, we are executing towards our plan.

Yep. Perfect. Thank you.

Thank you for your question. Our next question from Kash Rangan with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much. Appreciate it. And I'm curious to get your thoughts on two things, I'll keep this brief. In the subsequent few weeks after the quarter closed I'm curious, especially with rate cuts how you feel the customer feedback has been coming along, particularly on the SMB side, since the rate of change is not been discernible, at least at the end of the quarter? And one for you Olivier, as you look at GPU workloads, what about the company's existing portfolio geared towards CPU applies in a GPU world and how do you monetize an instance of GPU versus a CPU, if that word makes sense? Thank you so much.

I can go GPU. Yes. So look, there's two parts. There is -- what can you do for our GPU that's different from a CPU? I think in general there's quite a few things that aren’t the same, in terms of understanding how that machine sits with the rest of the application or like system performance, that sort of stuff. And there's quite a bit that's new and differentiated around profiling in general and understanding how you maximize the usage of the GPU bandwidth, which is usually what it's about. I would say we're -- so right now we're working with a number of customers that are real world large inference workloads on how who we can help on the GPU profiling side for inference. We are doing less on the training side, mostly because the training jobs tend to be more bespoke and temporary and there's less of an application that's attached to those that these are just very large clusters of GPUs. So it's closer to HPC in a way than it's to traditional applications. Though we are also experimenting with what we can do there, there is a world where maybe in a durable fashion 60% of workloads are interference and 40% are training. And if that's the case, there's going to be a lot of value to be had by having repeatable training and repeatable tooling for that. So we are also looking into that. Today, as of today, we really don't monetize GPU instances all that well compared to the other CPU instances. So GPU instance is many times the cost of a CPU instance and which is obviously same amount for it. That doesn't have to be the case in the future. If we do things that are particularly interesting, it can have a real impact and deliver value and would put whole customers use and make the best of the GPU in the end save money. So, today that's the current situation.

And as to your other question in the period since the closing of Q3, we've seen very similar trends to the year to date in Q3 in terms of customer growth, our strength in enterprise stability and SMB. And we have a strong pipeline for Q4 that we're working hard on harvesting as we get towards year-end.

Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. Our next question comes from Brent Thill with Jefferies. Brent, your line is now open.

Hi, good morning. David on RPO, it has been decelerating. It's in focus with investors. I know you've said focus on revenue. But I think many are kind of concerned about the trajectory, and I know you've said, hey, the backlog's strong and you're adding sales capacity and all of the things that make sense but your backlog is maybe bigger than the numbers we are reporting. Can you add anymore context to what the pipeline, how you feel about the pipeline, what you think is going on with the metric in terms of the D cell was a pretty, pretty big step down?

Yeah, I think the -- as we started talking about duration, we had a surge in these period, the period last year of longer term contracts. That was really customer led. We may well have that in the future, but in just comparing the timing of that, it doesn't affect revenues. We had that kind of compare, I would say, when you look at adjusting for duration and looking at over a long term, we do find that all of these metrics are circling around revenue, in the mid-twenties. So I think there's a lot of noise in those, and it has a lot to do with the timing particularly in RPO of multi-year deals. We'll report at the end of Q4 how that progressed. We have a lot of business to do in Q4, particularly in the larger customer and enterprise side. And we'll see where that lands, but I think it's again a best to go back towards revenues as the North Star.

And those really don't relate all that much to the sales pipelines because a lot of those -- I'm putting my CFO hard right now, but yeah -- which I am aware, so bear with me. Everything has to do with when customers recommit and extend their commit and for how long they extend this commit. And there's a high degree of variability there, so they might go from one year to three year. Those three years might actually run out or they might recommit after one year and a half or two years and a half or three years or maybe three years and two months, if it takes longer to figure out what level they want to be at next. And so it adds a ton of viability to the billing numbers in general. And that's why we don't look at them at all for managing the business. We look at usage and we look at the sales pipeline in terms of what new business with new workloads, with new revenue and usage are we getting from customers.

I think what Ollie is saying is that output to the natural flow of business, which has more volatility than revenues do.

Great. Thanks.

Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Karl Keirstead with UBS. Your line is now open.

Okay, great. I've got a couple of questions about the comment David, around some of your larger AI native customers, maybe revenues from them being a little bit more volatile going forward. I guess first question is, why do you think that is -- is this just a natural phenomenon of a few of those AI native customers now becoming quite large and so it's normal that they try to look for better unit pricing and optimization, or is there something else going on? And then maybe secondly, when you set your 4Q guide, did you embed the assumption of some of these AI startup pricing and observability trends that you called out or no, you're just trying to be prudent and that might be a little bit more of a 2025 phenomenon? Thanks so much.

Yeah, yeah, do you want to. I can take some of that. I think the, look, what we see there is we, so we have a group of AI like smaller, relatively small number of AI companies or AI native companies. Many of them are model providers or infrastructure providers for AI that serve the rest of the industry. And that’s really a proxy for the future growth of the rest of the industry in AI. That group has been growing very fast, and we mentioned it's 6% of our AR, it was about 4% of year-over-year growth in Q3 versus 2% one year ago. So it's been growing very fast. There is some revenue concentration within that group. So customers there are follow up all over in terms of revenue, like the rest of the customer base pretty much. And seeing this very fast growth what we do expect, we've seen that before, is we expect optimization at some point and in better terms, a recommit from those customers because they're all way over, or many of them are way over their last commit with us, which again goes back to the other comment on bookings like their growth doesn't show up at all in the RPOs and the bookings numbers because they're way over their commit. The analogy I would give there is what we've seen with cloud natives in the late 10s, early 20s where we had these numbers of cloud native consumer companies that were growing very fast with two differences. The first one is that the AI cohort is growing faster and there are larger individual ACVs for these customers. And the second difference is that it's a much smaller fraction of our total ARR. So at the time we had a very large number -- very large amount of our revenue that was cloud native companies and consumer companies in the late 10s and early 20s. Today, we just have 6% of our AI in that bucket. So we made that comment because we don't have anything to say in terms of where it's going. We don't -- there's nothing we see in October that tells us like there's big changes but we do think there can be volatility there. Like especially this can move the numbers in the short-term while the mid to long-term growth or the mid to long-term dominant motion we'll see is growth with that customer base. So that's why we made that comment.

Yeah. And as to the fourth quarter I echo the comments we make. Overall, which is we take conservative assumptions relative to usage growth that are lower than we've seen in providing our guidance, of course, where we are in the year, the effect on Q4 is more limited than it would be on next year. And as we report a Q4 and give guidance, we will update everybody on any trends that we do see in this cohort at that time.

We didn't change guidance principles for this, like, we made an extra comment on it because we want to be transparent, we've seen that, and we see some customers are aware of their commits but we didn't -- we didn't bake anything specific in the guidance.

Okay. That's all very helpful, thank you.

Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. Our next question comes from Kirk Materne with Evercore ISI. Your line is now open.

Yeah, thanks very much. Ollie, you mentioned the one federal customer this quarter -- a larger federal customer this quarter. Can you just talk on broader trends for you all within the federal government and sort of the opportunity there and what you're seeing, and I guess if it had any positive impact, obviously it's their fiscal year end in September, so just any comments more generally on Fed would be great? Thanks.

Look, it's a huge opportunity for us and I would say, quite early with some interesting successes, so we have some exciting logo there. Like, there's this one that we mentioned this quarter, which is an agency we all interact with and which has tremendous opportunity for growth and up sale with us. There's another agency that already has a very large multimillion dollar ACV footprint with Datadog that we didn't talk about this quarter, but that's been a long term customer. So there's plenty of opportunity. We're still very early in terms of capacity building, channel building, and go to market in general in government. So I would say it's still a small part of overall business but we see that there's tons of upside in it. And we're working hard on the product side so that we can capture that fully. So, we over the past few years worked on FedRAMP compliance and we are working further on getting into more regulated even tougher to get into workloads with FedRAMP and IO 5 and other certifications like that. So we have a long roadmap there and big plans to be out and a lot of upside.

Thank you.

Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Mike Cikos with Needham. Mike, your line is now open.

Hey, thanks for getting me on the call here guys. I just had two quick questions for you. The first on gross margin, just wanted to get a better understanding, is there anything you can speak to as it relates to those AI native customers, the intensity of those workloads, and then how your products feed into it or maybe even the broader portfolio and the product expansion you've seen, I'm just wondering if those newer products maybe are detracting from gross margin near-term here versus some expansion that we can expect as these products scale? That's the first question. Second question was just great to hear that the usage growth continues to trend higher, especially for those existing customers. Does it feel where we sit today in this “new environment” like this is par for the course kind of growth when thinking about the usage coming from those existing customers or is there a reason to believe that this can actually accelerate if things can move higher one way or another, what would drive that?

Um, yeah, so on, on gross margins, I would, in general, we are happy with where they are and we did some small moves in it, I wouldn't read too much in the moves. I mean, there's a behind the scenes, like there's a number of things that are under that. We keep raising new functionality, at the same time we keep optimizing our code and use it, we actually use our products to optimize that quite a bit. And then we also keep getting better and better agreements with our cloud providers as we scale. So it is combination of all that is what you see in the gross margin number. We -- internally, we have to make a call always on whether we direct more effort at building new functionality or optimizing. And the way we manage that is when gross margins get a little bit low we put more effort on optimizing and when we are in a happier zone, like we redirect more effort on new products and new functionality into that. There's not a lot of change like, product mix doesn't really matter all that much on a gross margin perspective. And so there's no particular worries there. We think long term there are plenty of opportunities to improve margins, but right now the focus is on really shipping enough products to enough customers, making sure that the products get provided with as much value as possible while staying within a certain happy zone on the overall margin. In terms of the growth of workloads, look, I mean, as we said, we see growth across the customer base pretty much. We see growth of classical workloads in the cloud. We see large growth -- very large growth on the AI native side. We think that the one big catalyst for future acceleration will be those AI native applications or those AI applications, I should say, going into production for non-AI native companies for a much broader set of customers than the customers that are deploying these kind of applications to their -- in production. And as they do, they will also look less like just large cluster of GPUs and more like traditional applications because the GPU needs a database, it needs core application in front of it, it needs layers to secure it and authorize it and all the other things. So it's going to look a lot more like a normal application with some additional more concentrated compute and GPUs.

Thank you very much Ollie.

Thank you. Please standby for the next question. The next question comes from the line of Gray Powell at BTIG. Your line is now open.

Alright, great. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe just a follow-up on Datadog on call. It was good to hear the commentary on that earlier in the call, and it has been coming up more in our field work. So I'm just curious like how should we think about the opportunity there, is that something that could completely displace a product like PagerDuty or is it more of an add-on feature since my understanding is it mainly works with the Datadog ecosystem versus other tools? Thanks.

Look, we'll take it where the demand takes us. So we initially built it as a way for customers within our ecosystem to have a fully integrated experience. And really as a step stone towards full automation of incident resolution and full ownership from end-to-end. The part that strategically is the most interesting to us is the automation of the resolution, not physically aging customers. That being said, the response from customers has been so strong that there is very high demand for integrating with many different other sources and plug ourselves into incident resolution loops that we might not have been a part of before even. And so that's definitely something that we're going to build for customers, and we're just very happy to see the demand there.

Understood. Alright, thank you very much.

Thank you. Please standby for the next question. The next question comes from Ittai Kidron with Oppenheimer. Your line is now open.

Thanks and nice numbers, guys. Ollie, a question for you. I think you mentioned in your prepared remarks that 15 of your 23 products are now running over $10 million. Maybe if you look at the ones that are still under $100 million or under $50 million, where do you see -- where are you most excited, which ones do you think have the highest odds of crossing the $100 million mark?

Well, again, I don't want to single out any products for which we didn't disclose metrics in particular. But look, we mentioned in previous calls, like there are products that are growing very fast that we think will reach the scale velocity. We see -- we talked about database monitoring, for example, was a product has been growing very fast, very clear value. And we -- I actually forgot which number we disclosed last time, but we did disclose a number for it. 1% of revenue is what we disclosed. And so this one is clearly headed for north of 50%. There's a number in the other cohort that I -- a number of products across security, user experience that I think are definitely going to get there very soon. So we feel good about all that basically. The point here is pretty much every single one of those products should be above $50 million. Some of them are going to get there faster than others. Some of them will cross $100 million. Some of them will cross $1 billion maybe. So I think we feel good about the product set.

That's great. Maybe as a follow-up for both of you. You didn't provide 2025 guidance, of course, but are there any thoughts you want to leave us with as we think about 2025 and perhaps given where we are in the year. Ollie, your initial conversations with customers and how they think about next year, anything to point out with respect to their behavior or investment areas of focus, which perhaps are different than what they've been in 2024?

Look, I think the only thing I would say is, I mean, I won't get into second-guessing our guidance or things like that. And we -- in general, also, it's very hard to guess usage ahead of time because that's actually very -- it is very different or can be very different from the intents that are being manifested by customers or their understanding of what the next year is going to look like. But the one thing I will say is we're investing. We're building sales capacity. We're definitely investing heavily in engineering. I think it's a target investment in the industry. Unlike many others, we don't expect at this point to have outsized investments in compute. We're not building absolutely large GPU clusters, but we are building engineering capacity, and we are building sales capacity. And so you should expect that in the numbers we give for next year.

Very good, appreciate it. Thank you.

David, anything to add or…?

No, I think we -- I've said that at this point, we've noted that there's been stability to upward trend in usage that many of our clients, particularly in enterprise are getting back to the work of launching digital applications, and that's creating the pipeline and the results for us. And although we still are in an environment that's careful and wants return on their investments. And we'll update everybody as to whether that's what we see. But generally, we're giving comments based on what we see in this environment, which has been good and stable.

Thank you. Appreciate it.

Thank you. This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn it back over to CEO, Olivier Pomel, for closing remarks.

Well, thank you all for attending the call. I want to give a few shout-outs. Firstly, for the product management team for building great products last quarter, the customers that actually spent all this time with us on getting those products to work right, especially for the new products, and I'm talking about LLM observability, for example, or On Call, and I know we spent a lot of time with customers to get those right. And I also want to give a special shout out to the go-to-market team. We have a very, very, very loaded fourth quarter, very full slate for everyone in the next, let's call it month and half. And so I know everybody is super hard at work. So thank you everyone. And on this, I think we'll wrap the call.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.