Good morning, and welcome to the Diversified Healthcare Trust Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Matt Murphy, Manager of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Joining me on today's call are Chris Bilotto, President and Chief Executive Officer; Matt Brown, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and Anthony Paula, Vice President. Today's call includes a presentation by management, followed by a question-and-answer session with sell-side analysts. Please note that the recording and retransmission of today's conference call is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of the company. Today's conference call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other securities laws. These forward-looking statements are based upon DHC's beliefs and expectations as of today, Tuesday, February 24, 2026. The company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to the forward-looking statements made in today's conference call other than through filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. In addition, this call may contain non-GAAP numbers, including normalized funds from operations or normalized FFO, net operating income or NOI and cash basis net operating income or cash basis NOI. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to net income is available in our financial results package which can be found on our website at www.dhcreit.com. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause those differences is contained in our filings with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements. And finally, we will be providing guidance on this call, including NOI. We are not providing a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures as part of our guidance because certain information required for such reconciliation is not available without unreasonable efforts or at all, such as gains and losses or impairment charges related to the disposition of real estate. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Chris.

Thank you, Matt, and thank you, everyone, for joining our call today. I want to start with a recap of a very busy and successful 2025 for DHC, in which we executed on the stated initiatives that we identified early in the year, and ended the year as the best-performing REIT in the U.S. as measured by both share price appreciation and total shareholder return. In 2025, we completed over $1.4 billion in capital markets activity, principally focused on financing, asset sales and the establishment of a $150 million undrawn credit facility. We also completed the wind down of AlerisLife, transitioning 116 communities, representing over 17,000 units to seven regionally focused operators and completed renovations at over 30 communities. These efforts, combined with the work of our dedicated asset management team, resulted in full year consolidated NOI growth of 31.3%, a reduction in our leverage of over three turns and no debt maturities until 2028. As one of the largest owners of senior housing properties in the country, we believe our recent accomplishments, combined with the investments we have made in the portfolio and the favorable industry outlook sets the stage for continued outsized growth in our SHOP portfolio as reflected in our 2026 guidance, which Matt will expand upon momentarily. Turning to the quarter. After the market closed yesterday, DHC reported strong fourth quarter results, particularly as it relates to our SHOP NOI, which improved 27.6% over last year to $38.3 million reflecting continued execution on our highlighted initiatives and further strengthening DHC's financial position. For the quarter, DHC delivered total revenue of $379.6 million adjusted EBITDAre of $72.4 million and normalized FFO of $21.8 million or $0.09 per share. Turning first to our senior housing portfolio. SHOP NOI for the full year came in at $139.3 million, which…

Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. During the fourth quarter, our same property cash basis NOI was $70.4 million, representing a 15.4% increase year-over-year and 12.4% increase sequentially. Our fourth quarter SHOP same-property results include continued positive momentum in pricing with average monthly rate increasing 580 basis points year-over-year and 120 basis points sequentially. Same-property occupancy increased 90 basis points year-over-year. These increases resulted in year-over-year same-property SHOP revenue growth of 5.6%. Year-over-year, our same-property SHOP NOI margin increased by 230 basis points to 13.3%, driven by our growth in revenue. As Matt will highlight shortly, we expect that continued increases in revenue and occupancy on the expense moderation result in strong NOI margin growth in 2026. Turning to G&A expense. The fourth quarter amount includes $5.7 million of business management incentive fee. For the full year, we recognized an incentive to RMR of $17.9 million. This incentive was driven apart by DHC's total shareholder return of nearly 113% during 2025. Excluding the impact of the incentive fee, G&A expense would have been $7.1 million for the quarter. During the quarter, we invested approximately $37 million of capital, including $20 million into our SHOP communities and $17 million into our Medical Office and Life Science portfolio. For the full year, our capital spend totaled $146 million, which is on the low end of our guidance. We continue to focus on disciplined capital spending as evidenced by a $45 million or 23% reduction when compared to 2024. For 2026, we expect our full year recurring capital expenditures to range from $100 million to $115 million, which represents an over 18% decrease at the midpoint when compared to recurring capital expenditures in 2025. Our 2026 CapEx guidance includes $80 million to $90 million in our SHOP segment, and $20 million to $25 million for our Medical Office and Life Science properties, it is important to note that our SHOP recurring capital guidance includes approximately $10 million of refresh ROI capital. Now I'll turn the call over to Matt.

Thanks, Anthony, and good morning, everyone. We ended the quarter with approximately $255 million of liquidity, including $105 million of unrestricted cash and $150 million available under our undrawn revolving credit facility. Subsequent to quarter end, we received a $27.2 million cash distribution from AlerisLife in connection with the wind-down of its business. In December, we redeemed the remaining balance on our 2026 zero-coupon bonds, which resulted in 45 collateral properties being released that have a gross book value of approximately $850 million. Following this redemption, we have a well-laddered debt maturity schedule with no maturities until 2028, allowing us to focus on operations. Our weighted average cash interest rate as of December 31 was 5.7%. Our net debt to adjusted EBITDAre declined materially from 11.2x at the beginning of 2025 to 8.1x while adjusted EBITDAre to interest expense improved from 1.1x to 1.5x over the course of the year. And based on our guidance, we expect year-end 2026 to be at or above 2x. We remain focused on further reducing our leverage, primarily by growing SHOP NOI, as well as completing the sale of 13 SHOP communities expected to close in March for $23 million. These 13 SHOP communities lost $1.2 million in the fourth quarter and $3 million for the full year. Our full year adjusted EBITDAre of $284 million was on the high end of our guidance range. For 2025, SHOP NOI was $139.3 million, which was at the high end of our increased guidance provided on our Q2 earnings call. Medical Office and Life Science NOI was $108.1 million, just above the midpoint of our guidance, and our triple net lease senior living community and wellness center NOI was $31.1 million, which exceeded our guidance. Looking ahead to 2026, we are confident that strong improvements in…

[Operator Instructions] And the first question will come from Michael Carroll with RBC Capital Markets.

Chris, how should we think about the go-forward strategy from here? Can you provide some color on the opportunities to reopen the wings that you talked about at existing communities? I mean, how many units could this add to the portfolio? And what could be the expected cost from that? And should we think about that as being the main strategy on the external investment side?

Yes. I mean, look, the main strategy is the continued unlock value proposition which is growing performance through operations. I mean, despite what we believe to be a really strong outlook for 2026. I think, collectively speaking, we believe we're still trailing kind of the benchmark and occupancy even at kind of the guidance occupancy provided. We know just based on kind of margins and where the portfolio will end up for 2026 that there's outsized potential to grow margins. Again, these are all kind of more organically opportunities. And I just want to emphasize we're laser-focused on continuing to kind of push in that direction, which will provide a healthy runway for the next several years. Specific to your question, as we think about kind of those wings, there's probably, give or take, 15 locations that we've identified that we're bullish on. I think through those, we probably can get in the neighborhood of close to 500 units, and we talked about mid-teens ROI supporting those. And so that -- that is going to be a function of over a period of time. That's not going to all happen in 2026. And I think the last part to your question, more specifically, is -- the cost is going to vary, but I think if we use kind of $125 million to $175 million per unit, that's probably kind of a decent kind of runway to consider. Again, still premature, but just kind of a benchmark to consider.

That's helpful. And will external investments still kind of be focused on these types of renovations? I mean, how are you thinking about the acquisition market? Is just the renovation still just have a better risk-adjusted return versus pursuing future acquisitions?

Certainly, we'll have a better risk-adjusted return for a couple of reasons. As you think about these kind of closed wings, mostly it's going to be to support new acuity. So for example, if we have a community that offers IL and AL, this is an opportunity to introduce memory care. And that just kind of adds for kind of the continuation of care in the community. And again, that's going to also support other drivers through kind of shared cost benefits, pushing rates at IL and AL given that you kind of have kind of the full package to offer. So it's kind of a rising tide list all boat scenario when you're investing in these wings. Look, we don't want to rule out the idea of looking at the acquisitions market, but at the same time, just want to temper that's not where our focus is today. Certainly, downstream, if we continue to see progress with the growth that we've outlined in 2026, and we think about capital recycling, we're selling kind of the assets we've noted, that could be a way to kind of support dipping our toe into the acquisition market. But again, there's a lot of opportunity embedded in what we have. So that will be kind of a priority we'll continue to address in the next couple of quarters.

Okay. And then on the operating side, I mean, is there anything that's specific that drove the 4Q margin improvement? I mean, how much of that was driven by the transition disruptions just kind of dissipating versus core operational gains?

It was a combination. Obviously, we had some transition noise more material in the third quarter. But as these operators are now getting in and rightsizing their cost structures, we definitely saw a little bit of a benefit in Q4 and would expect to continue seeing that as we move into 2026.

Was there any specific costs in 4Q related to transitions? Or are those -- like this right now is a pretty good run rate to think about?

It was a pretty small impact in the fourth quarter, nothing really material. So it's a decent run rate.

Okay. And then just last one for me. Can you talk a little bit about the January and February trends, I guess, specifically, was there any impact related to the flu season? And then, what was the average of rent escalators that you're able to pass through or your operators are able to pass through to specific customers? Can you provide any color on that?

Sure. I think for the rate, again, these -- the rate growth is going to happen sporadically over the year. We do typically have an outsized push in the beginning of the year, and this is primarily on the legacy Aleris properties. And that kind of rate range is 4% to 6%, which is consistent kind of with how we're thinking about the guidance for the year. But regarding kind of any impact with the flu season, nothing outsized. I mean, certainly, it's something that we deal with and we manage through each year. But there's nothing outsized relative to the portfolio, specifically on any impact or negative impact, if you will, with an outsized flu season. And we don't have February results fully in tow, but January looked promising and again, is in line kind of what our expectations are for the year. The one thing I would really highlight, it's going to take a little bit of time for these operators to kind of continue working through the transition. I mean, we've just completed transition properties literally at year-end last year. And so while some were done, let's call it, in kind of October, September, October, a lot are more weighted towards the back end of the year. So we should continue to see incremental benefit as they kind of get in and continue to work through the transition and the integration of their business models. But again, for January specifically, it's in line with some of the kind of the opportunistic views that we saw at the beginning of this in our overall guidance.

[Operator Instructions] The next question will come from John Massocca with B. Riley.

Maybe given some of your comments on some of these new operators continuing to get up to speed. As we think about the cadence of some of the NOI growth implied in guidance over the coming quarter? Should it be kind of back half of the year weighted then? Or is that maybe overstating the impact of timing for some of those transitions?

I mean, when you kind of bifurcate where the growth is coming, you've got kind of 1/3 of that through occupancy and that specifically will happen over the course of the year and through kind of the sales season, if you will, which is kind of backloaded Q2 and into Q3. So for that portion, yes, we would expect that to flow through as time progresses. When you think about kind of RevPOR and the growth there, that's going to be a function of the rate increase. Again, we'll get a big piece of that in the beginning of the year combined with levels of care, which will likely take a little bit more time as they get integrated. So from a top line, it's kind of the blend of those two. From an expense side, it's going to be a little bit of benefit out of the gate. One of the benefits of transitioning these communities as we're getting kind of the much more targeted local regional penetration of staffing and getting the benefit of that flow through. But there's still some work that the operators are going to do with respect to bringing in kind of the right team at the local level or continuing to work with them to execute on the state of business plan, and that piece can take a little bit of time. So I think that's a long-winded way of saying there is definitely opportunity on the front end. And again -- and then there's going to be continued, I would say, outsized incremental opportunity as we get into mid and late in the year.

Okay. And then just to kind of confirm, the 300 basis points of kind of occupancy growth in the guidance, is that kind of compared to 4Q end occupancy? Or is that kind of on the average occupancy over the course of 2025?

The latter. So it's comparing kind of full year average occupancy to, again, the guide of full year average occupancy.

Okay. And then as I think about kind of 4Q results compared to 3Q, was there anything driving the kind of sequential decline in overall rental revenue, but specifically kind of the SHOP rental income and resident fees other than just the asset sales that occurred over the 2H '25?

I would say a little bit on the asset sales, but I think if anything, it may have just been more tempered towards the actual operations being transferred and maybe a slight slowdown in pushing revenue and such is really the only real driver. But a lot of that noise is now behind us, and we start with a clean slate in 2026.

Okay. And then probably do the math myself to a certain extent. But when you think about the rev -- revenue -- the rent per room, sorry, and the RevPOR growth implied in guidance, what are you looking at there in terms of margin expansion kind of being implied with that over the course of '26?

Yes. I mean, ultimately, if you kind of do the math, the flow-through, we would expect close to a couple of hundred basis points of margin improvement on a same-store basis.

Okay. And then maybe moving on from the SHOP side of the business. As I think about the MOB and Life Science assets that have leases expiring in 2026, how do those look today? What do you think the prospects of renewal or releasing are? And is there potential for kind of rent roll-ups? Or how are you viewing those assets?

Yes. I mean for the known vacates in '26, there's two primary tenants, ones with -- and they're both full building users, one is with the building in Minnesota, which represents about 1.9% of annualized revenue and another building is in Fremont, California that represents about 1% of annualized revenue. I think the building in Minnesota, look, we've got some early indications of interest. That's going to go from a single-tenant building likely to a multi-tenant building. And so that will need to play out a little bit. We do have some runway before that tenant leaves midyear. So there's still time to evaluate kind of the ultimate strategy there. For the building in Fremont, that tenant doesn't expire until Q4 of 2026. And that's a really strong R&D market for life science. And so much more healthier outlook and interest on that building. So I would say, overall, I think there's some promising outlook to re-lease both buildings, but kind of more tilted towards Fremont kind of being kind of the better of the two opportunities.

Okay. And then I know you said dispositions are likely to be kind of selective and opportunistic. Would that kind of imply that they might be weighted more towards the MOB Life Science side of the business, just given the management transitions going on in SHOP. And I guess, if so, what does that market kind of look like today?

Yes. I mean, I think to be transparent, we don't have anything specifically teed up. But I think to the point that if we were to consider additional sales, there's slightly more opportunity on the MOB Life Science given that we've sold a lot of SHOP and kind of got rid of the low-hanging fruit, if you will, in 2025 on what we're closing in Q1. But look, I think, generally speaking, we've seen success in being able to sell assets. I mean, if we're selling assets, it's likely those that are occupancy challenge or in need of capital, which is consistent with what we've been selling. And so we've -- I guess, it's proven that there's a market for that, given all the transactions we did last year, which was a mix of both stabilized and nonstabilized assets. And it's just going to be -- that the value is going to be relative to the situation. So again, without having anything specifically identified, it's a little bit hard to kind of dial into a specific strategy outcome. But nonetheless, I think we feel good about being able to transact.

Next question will come from Michael Diana with Maxim Group.

What implications, if any, does your significant momentum have on the dividend?

So we are -- we just came off of a very active 2025 for 2026. Our major focus is going to be around operations with these transitions. Clearly, with our guidance, we're expecting growth in NOI, growth in normalized FFO and adjusted EBITDA. It's something that our Board will consider, but no immediate priorities on addressing the dividend right now.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Chris Bilotto, President and Chief Executive Officer, for any closing remarks.

Yes. Thank you for joining the call today. Please contact our Investor Relations team if you're interested in scheduling a call with DHC or meeting with management at the upcoming Citi conference. Operator, that concludes our call.

Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.