Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the BRP Inc.'s FY2020 Second Quarter Results Call. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Philippe Deschenes. Please go ahead, Mr. Deschenes.

Thank you, Luis. Good morning and welcome to BRP's conference call for the second quarter of fiscal year 2020. Joining me this morning are Jose Boisjoli, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Sebastien Martel, Chief Financial Officer. Before we move to the prepared remarks, I would like to remind everyone that certain forward-looking statements will be made during the call that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. I invite you to read BRP's MD&A for listing of these. Also, during the call, reference will be made to supporting slides and you can find the presentation on our website at brp.com under the Investor Relations section. So, with that, I’ll turn the call over to Jose.

Thank you, Philippe. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. I am pleased to report that we concluded the first half of the fiscal year on a strong note as our momentum continued in the second quarter and we have delivered solid results across the board. The demand of our product remains strong as we achieve another quarter of double-digit retail growth for powersports. Although, we had poor early spring weather, especially in certain regions like the northern and mid-west portion of North America, we were able to catch up in June and July for all product lines. From a financial standpoint, we experienced our best second quarter on the record, after delivering our highest revenue and normalized EPS diluted for that period. On the back of this solid performance, the successful completion of our substantial issuer bid and the closing of the Telwater acquisition we are narrowing the range and increasing our year-end EPS guidance to $3.65 to $3.80, an increase of 18% to 23% year-over-year. Now, let’s get into the highlight of the quarter starting with the financial result on Slide 4. Our revenue reached record level for second quarter at $1.460 billion, representing a year-over-year growth of 21%, notably driven by Year-Round Products. All regions contributed to the growth with revenue up 21% in the United States, 32% in Canada, and 14% for International. Our normalized EBITDA was up 16% to $168 million, resulting in a normalized earnings per share of $0.71, up 8% over last year. Our retail momentum continued to be strong. In North America, our powersports industry remain healthy and continue to perform well, despite negative weather condition earlier in the Spring posting a mid-single digit retail growth for the quarter. Our product continued to outperform in the region as we’ve delivered…

Thank you, Jose and good morning everyone. Our momentum continued in the second quarter as we delivered solid financial results that came in in-line with our expectations. Our revenues grew 21% to reach $1.5 billion for the quarter, representing a record for the second quarter BRP. Our gross profit margin ended up 22.5%, a decline of 70 basis points from last year's second quarter as a favorable impact coming from volume and pricing was more than offset by higher sales programs, production cost, and unfavorable product, and region mix. The normalized EBITDA was up 16% to $168 million and the normalized EPS reached $0.71. We generated $75 million of free cash flow and invested $67 million on CapEx. We were also quite active in terms of capital deployment over the last few months as we successfully completed the $300 million SIN effectively repurchasing 6.3 million shares and we completed the Telwater acquisition. To support both initiatives and to preserve our financial flexibility going forward, we raised the new term loan tranche of US$335 million during the quarter. Our balance sheet remains solid and our strong financial flexibility allows us to continue to invest in the business all the while maintaining the ability to opportunistically deploy different capital allocation initiatives. Turning to Slide 15. Our quarterly normalized net income was up about $3 million, compared to last year as it ended the quarter at $69 million. In terms of the year-over-year variations, we saw an increase of $72 million, driven by a favorable impact coming from volume, mix, pricing and sales programs. These elements were mostly offset by higher production and distribution costs, and higher depreciation expense for a total negative impact of $23 million. Higher operating expenses were $41 million to support our different projects, notably the launch of new…

Thank you, Sebastien. We have had a record performance for second quarter and I’m very pleased with the results and progress on our key strategic initiatives. We are experiencing continued momentum by product lines in the region and I still see lots of growth potential for business, especially in the Year-Round segment. I’m also pleased with the conclusion of the Telwater acquisition and the fact that it marks an important milestone in the advancement of the marine strategy. Despite talk of an economic slowdown, our industry remains healthy, our dealer traffic is good, and we continue to observe strong retail trend in August. Our team continued to execute well on all fronts, and I want to thank them once again for their hard work around the world. We are looking forward to our next Sea-Doo and Can-Am dealer meeting in a little over a week in Las Vegas and the introduction of more innovative products, and hope to see you there. And finally, as I mentioned earlier, we are confident that given our positive performance we will be able to deliver on our improved guidance. I will now turn the call over to the operator for questions.

Great, thanks. Two questions. One is, just looking at the commentary about off-road being kind of up mid-single digits, I guess others in the industry have talked about the June quarter being up high-single digits, I wonder if you could just sort of say what – if you saw deceleration in the growth rate in July or perhaps did not, just any color on that? And then, obviously of course, how August is also relative to that just in terms of acceleration or deceleration from those trends? Thanks.

Good morning, Robin. Obviously, we cannot comment on the others, but what we saw in Q2 is ATV was basically flattish when side-by-side was up high-single digits. Obviously, side-by-side has a big place in term of volume in the second quarter. And then, I cannot comment on the off-road numbers that you heard in other call.

But the July was not soft for us. It was good retail quarter, and we’re seeing as Jose alluded into his opening remarks we’re seeing, again we don't see the industry for August, but we see our numbers and the trends are positive as well in August.

Okay. Great thanks, just obviously there are concerns out there about broader macro factors in the last two months. And then just a long-term question, with shipments maybe more falling into Q2, I guess, or as two ramped up maybe faster than what you had initially guided or what expectations were for kind of what shipments would be in Q2. So, given that higher shipment rate, is there – could second half shipments also move up from these levels if – you know if it was a – kind of a supply constraint issue – you know in your original shipment guidance that maybe is now behind you?

Yes. But we’ve adjusted the guidance for, you know, product driven by side-by-side off the strong demand that we saw in the second quarter. And so, the guidance now reflects what we anticipate is going to happen in the second quarter. Obviously, if demand was going to – is continuing to be robust, could we adjust our shipments? Obviously, yes, we have that possibility of adjusting shipments in need be at increasing capacity before the end of the year.

Is there kind of a percent capacity that’s being utilized now versus what potential is still there? I don’t know if that’s something that you can quantify, and then …?

But, if I give you some color, and again, just to remind you what we said before, in H1 basically our capacity was similar to last year because we shut down the factory for two weeks to remodel it, and we had a slow ramp-up to ensure that quality was right. Then overall, our H1 capacity was similar to last year. And in the second half, Q3, Q4, we had like a 50% capacity possibility, and right now, we are running because Q3 is always, you know, we introduced the new model year. Q3 will be a strong quarter. More to come on Q4, but this is the type of capacity that we have. Then, on a full-year basis, overall, if we will be using the full capacity, we’ll be about 25% up versus last year.

Okay. Great, thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is from Benoit Poirier, DesJardins Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning, gentlemen and congratulations for the good results. When we look at the retail inventory, it was up 16% year-over-year. Would you be able to quantify how much was weather driven and what should we expect in Q3 in terms of inventory level?

Yes. When I look at the – good morning, Benoit. When I look at the inventory, as I said, again, we’re very comfortable. Retail was only softer for personal watercraft and that was impacted by weather, but it was, again, very strong for ATV and super strong for side-by-side, so – why we’re talking a few thousand units in inventory because the weather, that’s probably the slice of it, so not very material.

Okay, okay. Perfect. And for the Ryker, you've been able to ramp-up successfully the product and also with millennial you also. Could you maybe provide more color about what you’ve learned from them related to the brand, the desire to have a two-wheeler vehicle and also how they use Ryker as opposed to the Spyder in terms of commuting versus a pure hobby?

That’s a loaded question, Benoit. Let’s say, it's a bit early to conclude on the Ryker. We’re super happy about the reception of the unit, and as you know, today our RT and F3 owners are in average 59 years old, and we’re targeting consumer between 35 and 55, and right now, very preliminary, but the average Ryker user or buyer is about 10 years younger than the RT and F3, then we’re attracting definitely younger people. That being said, it's a bit early into the season. You have early adopter, you have people who always wanted to have a three-wheeler and could not afford in RT or F3 that decided to buy a Ryker, then very difficult to conclude at this point. Then the intend to finish the season because there is still retail going on, and then, we started shipping the model year 2020 in August and there is still some Ryker, I mean where still some retail going on, and we’ll have a complete analysis of the season later in December, and when we meet you at the Analyst Day in October, and we will be able to conclude more at the end of the next year.

Okay, that’s great color. And when we look at Marine, you’re over index to the U.S. Northern and Midwest region, could you talk a bit about your dealership expansion strategy? How it goes so far?

Yes. We – basically there is three type of expansion. There is Alumacraft or Manitou dealer or Evinrude to take another brand. There is a conversion to Evinrude, the Alumacraft or Manitou dealer, we take Evinrude and there is white space. And again, we will share with you more about the detail of our strategy in October, but basically we had a goal this year, in fiscal year 2020, to add about 120 – 150 [roof] and it could be an Alumacraft dealer taking Evinrude or an Alumacraft taking Manitou or a white space, and we are about halfway there, then we’re going – we’re tracking quite well. Obviously, like I said in my remark, I mean being – Manitou is very, very Midwest and Alumacraft is East and we had a more difficult season then what we had hoped for. But again, the Marine strategy is a long-term strategy. I'm very happy with the work that the teams are – the work that the team have done so far on developing the next generation of boat with the new generation of Evinrude, and we feel confident in the future.

Okay. Last one for me, from a capital deployment standpoint, the stock is down significantly since the completion of the substantial issuer bid, so I was wondering if you could tell more about the room to perform further in CIB and given the devaluation right now and the strong outlook.

Yes. Obviously, we are very disappointed with where the stock price is trading. Obviously, it’s not reflective of the performance that we’ve had over the last several years and last quarters. As you said, the momentum is there. And so, the valuation is attractive for buybacks, and obviously, it’s something that we will consider and entertain in the next two quarters.

Okay. Thank you very much for the time.

Thank you. Our next question is from Tim Conder from Wells Fargo Security. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Gentlemen, any commentary that you can give us relating to the promotional activities that you may have done during the fiscal Q2 or that you’re seeing in the market right now, and again, maybe across the product lines on the Marine side, and then, on the ATV and the side-by-side product lines? Thank you.

Good morning, Tim. If we start by off-road, I would rate it yellow. ATV was very similar to the last few years, and on the side-by-side, you need to understand that it’s the first year where we can – we have some product availability, and is the first season where we had like some non-current at the end of June. Then, we had, for the first time, some normal promotion on Defender and the Maverick family, and some of our competitor complain about it, but the rebate we were giving is in-line with what every OEM is doing at the end of the season. Then, I would consider off-road yellow. Watercraft, we have reacted on the back end of the summer because we were behind, then, last year was green, this year we invested a bit more than last year, not ridiculous, but a bit more than last year, and three-wheel, I will consider it green. We – if you remember, we adjusted our pricing in RT and F3 last year, and our promotion from model year 2019 started only in August like it should be. Then, this is overall the retail environment. On the boat side, we were a bit more generous than in the past two year, but again, in line with the other OEM.

Okay. And Jose, any color geographically whether you want to look at North America collectively or Canada versus other U.S., and then, the – that basically the rest of the world, or you want to say Europe or just broad geographic regions as far as promotions and collectively or if you do want to break them down by the product categories?

Yes. What I give you, Tim, is applying to Canada and United States. The situation was about the same in both countries. The weather was the weather and we catch up in June, July on the retail front. At international, it’s a lot of moving piece. Scandinavia was similar to what we saw in North America in term of weather. Then we had a slowdown in the watercraft in Scandinavia. Off-road was not affected. That being said, in the Western Europe, watercraft have done extremely well because they had a warm summer and we’re very happy with the overall. Other than that, some adjustment in APAC, but overall, I would say very similar to last year, except North America and Scandinavia.

Okay, great. Thank you for the color.

Yes.

Thank you. Our next question is from Gerrick Johnson from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Looking at your own inventory up 22%, can you discuss the puts and takes there? Thank you.

Yes. Good morning, Gerrick. Well, as you probably saw, the second half of the year implies a very strong H2 from volume growth as well and strong profitability growth. And so, we are or we have produced some of the units for shipments in Q3, and so that is the main driver of the increased inventory. The SSV business is going strong. We have also a strong international business with longer transit times and that business is growing as well, and so, that needs to be accounted for in our planning as well. And therefore, that results in higher inventory levels.

Okay, and thank you for that. And one more thing that you don’t seem to talk about, I’d like to hear about is your initiatives in taxes and how that new office is going, and you know, some update on what's going on with your stuff in taxes? Thanks.

Overall, I mean we are on plan. We ramp up the number of people in Dallas and we changed a bit the structure of the management team. We divided the United States in three regions, and we have a leader on each region that give us. In the past, we were managing United States a lot, I mean East to West, South to North, and now, we have like more regional focus which give us an opportunity to have tactical focus on different regions or different opportunities. Then overall very happy with the Dallas office and we believe that we have a lot of people there that are better connected to the U.S. market versus when we were managing United States from Canada.

Great, thank you.

Yes.

Thank you. Our next question is from Mark Petrie from CIBC. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. I just wanted to ask about the dealer base in the U.S., and I guess, specifically mostly on the side-by-sides, but I – you know I think your sort of at relative maturity in terms of dealer count, but gaining floor space in mind share. Wonder if there are any metrics you can share that would help us gauge that, and how you, you know, sort of continue that momentum and obviously there’s a combination of factors, but is the focus sort of in continuing that momentum more on just generating demand? Or is there still more to do around engagement improving systems and that sort of thing?

On the number count, we believe we are about the right number of dealers. If you remember, we signed a lot of dealer in the last few years, and now, we have about 1,250 in North America. There is always some turn 25 to 30 years that is happening, but the focus is more on what you said continuing to gain space into the dealership and gain in efficiency, better engage with our dealers, have the dealers to become better retailer, and it’s a -- we work with them hand-on-hand. Then this is the focus, and we are doing, I believe, a pretty good job to have business discussion with dealers and helping them to raise the bar.

And do you think, you know, broadly speaking obviously there’s lots of factor, but in terms of driving that engagement, is it more a matter of continuing to create consumer demand, and obviously, the dealers are going to respond to that? Or is it, you know, in terms of how you engage with the dealers, you know, manage their profitability, improving systems, ordering systems, inventory, supply and those types of levers?

I mean we see – we’re trying to help the dealer to order the right product mix, and we’re monitoring more and more their inventory helping them to understand the retail and make sure that they have the right model at the right time in the dealership. Also, the service part is getting more and more important. There is a lot of money tied into the service part and the dealer – some dealer do it extremely well, others not as well. Then it's working hand-on-hand with the dealers to help to be more efficient in what they do. And so far, we don't see the need to increase the number of dealers. It might happen if we continue to grow in the side-by-side business where we have some, maybe today we have a dealer supporting a big region and maybe in time we need two, but for this year, the focus is more working on the efficiency of the dealer.

Okay. I appreciate it.

Thank you. Our next question is from Craig Kennison from Baird. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I wanted to ask about your view of the U.S. consumer. A lot of talk about maybe a slowdown, maybe that’s especially true with wealthier consumers, but you have an interesting perch on the world what are you seeing?

Yes. Good morning, Craig. I mean again there is a lot of talk about a slowdown, but you know the thing that we’re watching that we believe could affect our business, but I’ll give you some statistics. U.S. unemployment rate in July was 3.7%, very low. The housing slowed down a bit, but it was up 0.6% in July versus a year ago. The U.S. consumer consumption remained strong. It was up 3.3% in June and 3.4% in July, and to be honest, I mean, we don't see a slowdown in our powersports business. I mean Q1, the industry was up high-single digit, and in Q2, we were mid-single digit up. Then this is – and you know we’re not the economist, but this is the thing that we believe that is affecting our business, and so far, we're very happy with the state of the economy and the consumer.

Thanks. And with respect to Telwater, I apologize if I missed it, but could you frame the revenue and margin profile of that business and detail what's included in guidance?

Yes. The – so with guidance we have six months of revenue built in there. On an annual basis, Telwater is a – let’s say $80 million to $90 million business, Canadian dollars. Margin profile is very similar to what you seen in other boat companies in the U.S. So, lower gross margin, lower level of operating expenses, but similar EBITDA margins.

Thank you. And then finally, again with respect to Telwater, to what extent do you intend to run Telwater, Alumacraft, and Manitou separately versus trying to leverage any commonalities between – among those businesses, you know, in terms of R&D and other factors to get efficiency?

Yes, absolutely. I mean we are working right now on the metrics organization where obviously there will be a leader for each boat brand. But you have cross functional function like design R&D, operation where company will share the best practice. What we like about the three acquisition is they are both – the three of them are involved in aluminum boat construction and there is definitely synergy between each of them to be gained, and comparing the way they do think. On top of it, in terms of product development, we have team right now working on the next generation of boat and engine to make sure that we have a perfect integrated product. Then, basically it’s a metric structure where there is a responsible for each boat brand, but you have some cross functional function to help the synergy.

Very helpful, thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Next question is from Brian Morrison from TD Securities. Please go ahead.

Good morning. I think I understand the increase in inventory in the powersport industry, I’m content with that, but maybe with the inclusion of Telwater and the flat revenue guidance in Marine now, maybe can you just walk through or help us understand the Marine inventory both in the dealer network and internally? And potentially with the industry softness that you are going through right now and albeit potentially temporary whether your appetite for M&A might be heightened or whether you’re content with your current portfolio?

Yes. Then again, even though the inventory have decreased by 10% into the quarter, then we are comfortable with our level of inventory. On the boat side, the two brand that we manage in North America are very different. Manitou, it’s a high-ticket item, and they used to have five to six months of inventory at the dealership. They turned their inventory typically a bit more than two times a year, and right now, we have about six months of inventory out there, about 10% higher than typical, then we’re comfortable with that. Alumacraft is a lower ticket item. Their normal inventory is more in the 12 months, about the same then the industry average. And we’re a bit maybe 5% to 10% more than typical, but we are comfortable on both brand on the boat inventory at the dealer. At our factory, very minimal. I mean this is – a boat is a big piece of equipment and we have minimum inventory in our yard at both Manitou and Alumacraft. For Telwater, it’s about the same. Again, we’ve done officially the acquisition on August 1. It’s the same pattern, not much inventory at the manufacturing facility, and I believe they turned their inventory quite high, but I don't have enough data to be – to answer your question. In term of acquisition in the boat space, for the time being, we are happy with those three boat company and the focus in the next, I would say, 12 months would be to make sure that we maximize the synergy and we maximize the integration and how we can maximize the work between the three boat company and BRP to again deliver on the boat strategy. Then don't expect boat acquisition in the next 12 months.

Okay, thanks. Just to clarify, in terms of the inventory then, should we expect promotional activity in the back half of the year and I currently presume that that’s factored into your current guide?

Yes. Promotional activity should be similar year-over-year. Obviously, sometimes our promotional activity may be influenced by weather, especially when we look at the snowmobile season that is upcoming, but the guidance reflects what we believe is appropriate promotions in order to drive the retail that ultimately drives our [wholesale] numbers.

Okay. One last housekeeping item, maybe Sebastien, in terms of your net income adjustment, can you maybe just clarify it? It’s modestly changed, but excludes – pardon me includes an FX change. Maybe just on a normalized basis, can you just tell me what you changed here?

Yes. The FX change that you see in our normalization of net income and normalization of EBITDA relates to the long-term debt. So, as our debt, which is denominated in US dollar, gets revalued every quarter that creates the FX – non-cash FX variation in the P&L. And given the materiality of the debt and the swings that we often see in currency, it does create noise in the P&L and that’s why we normalize that item.

Yes. So, just on a normalized basis, has net income changed? Or is up or down?

Well, the net income as per the bridge is up $3 million, that’s $69 million. If you look at the bridge that we have in the webcast.

Sorry, I’m talking about the guidance.

The guidance. Sorry. The normalized net income is up, reflecting the EBITDA adjustment that we did on the bottom end of the range.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. Next question is from Greg Badishkanian from Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Good morning. It’s actually Fred Wightman on for Greg. Just wondering if you could talk about what if any impact you are seeing in terms of the supply chain either product disruptions or pricing changes just given the tariff and trade back and forth we are seeing in North America and then what that means for the implied back half increase in output that you guys are expecting in guidance?

Yes. As we’ve shared with all of you in the last few quarters, the whole tariff dispute between U.S. and China is having minimal impact on our results. Let’s say the way for is that we have just announced, we are probably looking at a worse a $5 million impact for us. So, all the tariffs, when you combine them all for the full-year, so from way one to way four, you are probably looking at $15 million for full-year – for this year. And let's say if that was to be applied on a full-year basis, you are looking at probably maximum $20 million. Again, we source very few of our components from China. When we look at our whole supply chain and product quality, it doesn’t necessarily always fit to source in China, because we are not necessarily all meeting the specs that we want to meet or the lead times are not there. So, that’s why we source very few of our components from China and we are not as impacted as other companies.

That’s really helpful. And then there is a call-out in the slide specifically for the Maverick Sport dealer inventor impact, how much is that specifically on a percentage basis. On the top of my head, I wouldn’t be able like give it to you. I will probably give it to you offline, but last year we had very little Maverick Sport in the network, It was a new product, and as we were obviously capacity constrained, we privileged the shipments, doubled the Maverick X3 and the Defender, which are higher margin products and that’s why this year now with the capacity we have, we ship more into the network.

Okay. Will follow-up. Thank you.

Thank you. Next question is from Derek Dley from Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Good morning. Just following up on, just that question in terms of dealer inventory. There is also a comment in that just in terms of snowmobile sales having earlier shipment. So, should we expect some sort of for timing adjustment between Q2 and Q3?

No. Again it’s a small volume. We always – this year as the mobile volume shipments are expected to be higher than last year and so given the season and the production schedule is very condensed. You have the abilities to either produce earlier in the second quarter or later in the fourth quarter depending on when engineering release are ready that’s going to impact when we ship and therefore this year because of those factors we ship more units in the second quarter.

Okay. That’s helpful. And Sebastian. I think in the past you’ve provided a bit more color just in terms of some of the puts and takes in the magnitude of each of the impacts on gross margin. That you called in the press release, commodity production distribution, wondering if you could give us that bridge again?

Yes. Sure. So, as you all saw those margins are down 70 basis points this quarter. Volume walls a positive impact as you saw the revenue growth year-over-year. So, that’s almost a 200-basis point plus to the margin. Mix was unfavorable and sales programs as well were unfavorable. The mix driven obviously by Ryker and also, we did shift less X3’s in the quarter as we knew that we were coming out with the new X3 at 195 horse power. So, we kind of held back on some of the shipments of X3s. That was a negative, combined are the mix and the sales program is 140 basis points. Production cost negative 80 basis point, half of it coming from added depreciation. The other half coming from obviously now we are running a bigger plant. We’ve kind of turn two ways of increases on a year-over-year basis. So, that’s being reflected in our operating cost. So, that’s 80 basis points, and the last item FX were 50 basis points.

Great. Very helpful. Thank you very much.

Thank you. The last question is from Cameron Doerksen from National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Just wanted to, I guess, clarify the question earlier on the, I guess, some of the inflationary cost headwinds and then the tariff impact. I think in the past, the number that you had talked about was kind of $35 million in inflationary costs, some of that was tariffs and some other things. What's, I guess, the equivalent number now on a kind of a full-year basis?

Well we talked about $35 million impact in the past for what we call inflation and freight commodity and tariffs, but you could add an extra 5 million to that Cameron.

Okay. Perfect. That's great. And just on the side-by-side business, just thinking about the product portfolio now, you've introduced the eighth platform, which you've been targeting over that period. I just wonder if you can talk a bit about just on a product basis where you think you're still underrepresented? Or is it just really more of a kind of growing market share in the subsegments that you're in now? Is there anything else that you feel as though that you need to, I guess, increase the product portfolio to continue to grow?

Yes. In the last four years, basically we introduced new platform in almost every segment into the industry and there is still white space for us and the side-by-side business and you can expect in time other new platforms, not at the pace of one every six months, but you can expect also variation of model trying to create new segment like an example, the Fish Pro in the watercraft, we’re good to create new segment. In a product category that will be our main focus and still if you look at our product portfolio, today we have the base, but we can continue to expand our offering to the consumer and delivering on new trend or new request for consumer. And some investor is always asking the question, will you stop there? For sure not. I mean, we intend to keep the same pace of investment that we have done in the last four years forward. Obviously, like I said, this is not necessarily a new platform every six months, but you can expect that you will continue to push in the side-by-side industry.

Okay, that’s great. It’s very helpful. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. So, Mr. Deschenes, this was our last question. I will now return the meeting back over to you for closing remarks.

Thank you, Luis, and thanks everyone for joining us this morning. We want to invite you to join us at our Dealer Event in Las Vegas, in September 10 and 11, and our third Investor Day, in October 28 and 29. Thanks again everyone, and have a good day.

Thank you. Your conference has now ended. Please disconnect your lines at this time. We thank you for your participation.