Good morning, and welcome to the Second (sic) [Fourth] Quarter 2013 Dover Corporation Earnings Conference Call. With us today are Bob Livingston, President and Chief Executive Officer; Brad Cerepak, Senior Vice President and CFO; and Paul Goldberg, Vice President of Investor Relations. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, this conference call is being recorded and your participation implies consent to our recording of this call. If you do not agree with these terms, please disconnect at this time. Thank you. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Paul Goldberg. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Jennifer. Good morning and welcome to Dover's fourth quarter earnings call. With me today are Bob Livingston and Brad Cerepak. Today's call will begin with comments from Bob and Brad on Dover's fourth quarter and full year operating and financial performance and follow with our outlook for 2014. We will then open up the call to questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note that our current earnings release, investor supplement and associated presentation can be found on our website, www.dovercorporation.com. This call will be available for playback through February 13 and the audio portion of this call will be archived on our website for 3 months. The replay telephone number is (800) 585-8367. When accessing the playback, you'll need to supply the following access code: 31028485. Before we get started, I'd like to remind everyone that our comments today, which are intended to supplement your understanding of Dover, may contain certain forward-looking statements that are inherently subject to uncertainties. We caution everyone to be guided in their analysis of Dover by referring to our Forms 10-K and 10-Q for a list of factors that could cause our results to differ from those anticipated in any such forward-looking statement. Also, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement except as required by law. We would also direct your attention to our website, where considerably more information can be found. Also this presentation contains pro forma financial information that reflects the operations of Knowles as a discontinued operation. Upon completion of the spin, Knowles' results will be reclassified to discontinued operations for reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is subject to a number of estimates, assumptions and uncertainties and does not purport to represent what our results of operations would have been if the spin-off of Knowles had occurred as of the dates indicated, results will be -- what results will be for any future periods or what the historical results of Dover will be upon classifying Knowles as a discontinued operation as of the effective date of the spin-off of Knowles. And with that mouthful, I'd like to turn the call over to Bob.

Thanks, Paul. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for this morning's conference call. I was very pleased with our fourth quarter results highlighted by broad-based revenue growth with all segments contributing. Notably, Engineered Systems delivered 12% growth and Printing & Identification grew 9%. In all, we generated 5% organic revenue growth and grew adjusted EPS, 17%. From a geographic perspective, our North America markets remained solid. Our European markets continued to show improvement with double-digit growth driven by our short-cycle business activity complemented by project shipments. Lastly, our China as well as our Rest of World markets were strong across all segments. Now let me share some specific comments on our fourth quarter. At Communication Technologies, our consumer electronics growth was driven by the continued rollout of a third quarter OEM product launch where we delivered high volumes across all our product lines. Our strong position with this OEM allowed us to grow nicely despite continued headwinds at 2 other customers. Knowles continues to invest in innovative acoustic solutions, which will position them well for future product launches. In our Energy segment, improving well activity and increased international business drove significant growth in our drilling and downstream businesses. Our modest growth in production reflects continued weak winch markets and reduced sucker rod activity in North America. We achieved growth of 50% in markets outside the U.S., Canada and Europe on the benefits of our geographic expansion programs. Fundamentals remained solid in our artificial lift markets. Within our Engineered Systems segment, we saw strong growth across both platforms. Our Refrigeration & Industrial results were very solid, driven by improving activity with regional refrigeration accounts and robust growth in the auto aftermarket and food service markets. In our fluids platform, solid results were driven by our pump businesses, particularly…

Thanks, Bob. Good morning, everyone. Let's start on Slide 3 of our presentation deck. Today we reported fourth quarter revenue of $2.2 billion, an increase of 10% over the prior year. Organic revenue grew 5% and growth from acquisitions was also 5%. Adjusted EPS was $1.28, an increase of 17%. A reconciliation of our adjusted earnings per share is in the appendix deck of our presentation deck. Segment margin for the quarter was 16.5%, substantially unchanged from last year, whereby improved margin in Engineered Systems and Communication Technologies were offset by the anticipated lower margin in Energy. This overall result reflects solid execution and was in line with our expectations. Bookings increased 9% over the prior year to $2.2 billion. This result represents 16% growth in Engineered Systems and 7% growth in Printing & Identification. Bookings increased 4% in Energy, driven by robust downstream and drilling activity. Communication Technologies bookings increased 3%. Overall, book to bill finished at 0.98, which is in line with seasonal trends. Backlog increased 5% to $1.6 billion. Of note, absent Knowles, book to bill was 1, unchanged from last year; and backlog was $1.3 billion, an increase of 5%. In the quarter, we generated $376 million of free cash flow, representing 17% of revenue. For the full year, free cash flow was $942 million, representing 11% of revenue. Turning to Slide 4. Printing & Identification, driven by their fast-moving consumer goods markets, grew 8% organically. Communication Technologies grew 7% on the strength of new product launches in the consumer electronics market. Energy's growth was 4% and Engineered Systems grew 3%. Overall, organic revenue growth was 5%. Our acquisition growth in the quarter was 5%, comprised of 8% in Engineered Systems, 5% in Energy and 1% in Printing & Identification. Turning to Slide 5 on our…

Thanks, Brad. 2013 was a great year for Dover. We delivered robust revenue and earnings growth and took major steps to position us for continuing future success. We continued to invest for growth. We completed 10 acquisitions last year for $323 million to extend and enhance our market positions and we invested in internal growth initiatives, especially geographic expansion. Our OPW business is a great example and has grown to a $500 million business thanks to internal initiatives and the addition of Jump, Fibrelite and KPS acquisitions. Through their expanded product offering, they can now offer a complete fuel management solution to customers around the world. Our artificial lift business is another case in point. Here, we've significantly built our sales and service and business development resources in the Middle East, Australia, Southeast Asia and South America, all of which have contributed to significant revenue growth in this business over the last 2 years. We have also increased our productivity investments and have numerous consolidation and Lean projects either completed or well underway. We extended our long track record of increasing our annual dividend and continued executing on our $1 billion share repurchase program. From a strategic perspective, the pending spin of Knowles is a key step in positioning Dover as a best-in-class industrial manufacturer. I am excited about the growth prospects we have across the company. We have very strong and expanding market positions in refrigeration and food equipment, fluid transfer, including pumps, Energy, Printing & Identification and other market-leading industrial businesses serving the vehicle service, waste management and heat exchanger markets, to name a few. Without exception, all our businesses have meaningful opportunities to broaden the revenue base and push into new markets. We will continue to build our acquisition pipeline and pursue those opportunities that strengthen our market position, with a particular emphasis on geographic market expansion. In addition to our growth initiatives, we will more aggressively invest in productivity and Lean activities. I believe we can achieve higher-margin and deliver more consistent performance while continuing to be a very strong generator of cash. In all, I believe the future is very bright for Dover and I am more confident than ever about our positioning and long-term prospects. In closing, I'd like to thank our entire Dover team for their continued focus on serving our customers and driving results and I look forward to a great '14. With that, Paul, let's take some questions.

Thanks, Bob. [Operator Instructions] Jennifer, can we have the first question?

Yes, your first question is from Deane Dray with Citi Research.

Hey, I know that the 2014 guidance versus consensus is not applicable because we all haven't had the ability yet to restate our models. And looking at and listening to your guidance here, one of the things that I'm not sure I caught was whether the electronic assembly disposition proceeds, as well as the dividend from Knowles, are they included in your '14 guidance? And can you calibrate both of those items?

No -- well, they're not included in our guidance with respect to having an impact on EPS. The proceeds from the remaining business within electronic assembly and test deck is expected to be about $170 million and the dividend from the Knowles spin is expected to be $400 million. We have that cash to play with for the balance of the year, Deane.

Okay, good. That's what I was looking for. And Bob, did I hear correctly, you said in the first quarter, you expect to announce some new deals? And is the EPS reflected in your earnings bridge under the acquisitions or would that be additive?

No. No, the guidance for 2014 and what you see on the bridge is that, that Brad and Paul presented, are only including acquisitions that have been closed.

Okay. So then just last one for me on that point for acquisitions. You talked a bit about what you're seeing that gives you the confidence that you'll be able to complete some deals this quarter that -- in the first quarter. And can you maybe size for us what we should be thinking about?

Well, our confidence is the fact that we're sitting here in the first quarter and we're sitting on top of these deals. And actually, our guidance for '14 does include a small acquisition that was completed January 3 or January 5 or whatever. But, Deane, you'll see the emphasis in our pipeline execution here in our first quarter continue to be around Energy and our fluids businesses, as well as some interest we have in continuing to expand our refrigeration business.

Your next question is from Shannon O'Callaghan of Nomura Securities.

Bob, maybe just a follow-up to that. I mean, how would you kind of size your acquisition firepower at this point, right? I mean, you've got like $8 million -- I'm sorry, $800 million on the balance sheet. You talked about the DEK proceeds, the $400 million from Knowles, which is I think a little more than the initial expectation. And now you're telling us 11% of revenue from free cash for the remaining co. I mean, that adds up to a good chunk. I mean, is all that, other than dividend, I mean, are you biased to acquisitions on that and how are you thinking about the repurchase?

Shannon, if you look at -- let's see, I guess the last 2 years, '12 and '13, I think you see a fairly balanced allocation of capital from Dover. We've -- the capital has been allocated to dividends and to share repurchase activity as well acquisitions. I happen to like that balance. And I think that without telling you what we're going to do yet, we'll talk more about that after the Knowles spin. But I think you should expect to see us have that balance of capital allocation going forward.

Just to reiterate, our first -- our forecast does include completion of the $1 billion, as I said, in the first quarter. So that's approximately $300 million or so of buybacks to be completed.

It doesn't sound like going forward, there's sort of this pace of buy. I mean the pace of buyback you've been under is related to that $1 billion plan, which was somewhat unusual for you guys. But it sounds like maybe that's not an unusual pace going forward?

I'm not going to define a number. I'm going to repeat what I said. I happen to like the balance capital allocation approach we've had for the last 2 years. And we'll give you a little bit more insight into that after the spin is complete.

Okay. And then just on -- kind of the outlook for Energy, I mean, drilling went through kind of a soft patch and now it's rebounding strongly. Now production is sort of in its soft patch. I mean, when you think about the pieces -- and of course, downstream was really strong. So I mean, as you think about those pieces going forward, I mean, do you expect production to rebound, the others to slow? Maybe a little color on that.

Look, we actually look for a fairly well-balanced contribution from all 3 sectors in our Energy segment for '14. Shannon, your comment about the lower activity in production. Let me be more specific. If you look at our production activity, let's label it our artificial lift business, we've got 2 main products or applications: it's the sucker rod and then the pump application at the bottom of the well. Where we have seen some softness in activity in the final, I would say, 3 or 4 months of the year has been specific with sucker rods. And even more specific, Shannon, it's been very specific to Texas activity. Our pump business has continued to be strong and has expanded throughout the year and I would -- not to be defensive, but I truly do see that a lot of the softness we saw in Texas in the fourth quarter around sucker rods was the -- around the initial installation of new artificial lift systems in a couple of the key basins and primarily related to weather.

Your next question is from Scott Davis with Barclays.

I don't want to spend too much time in this M&A thing. But can you just give us a sense of a range of revenues you think is realistic to add in 2014? I mean, even if the range is wide, just give us a sense of what you think you might be able to get done.

Oh, gosh. That's hard to do until we actually sign the deal and close it. I would -- clearly, clearly north of $100 million and south of $500 million. And that's a pretty wide range.

I think another way to think about it is, we have 2% that carries over for completed deals. We did 5% in 2013. I would think it's not a specific target or goal. But that round about that 5% range would be something that would make sense, perhaps.

I agree. Yes.

Okay. That's exactly what I was looking for. And then as far as the 10 deals you did in 2013, I don't think EBITDA multiples were disclosed on any of them really. But can you give us a sense either multiple price of sales or multiple of EBITDA, what that average was?

I'm not sure I can give you a specific number on what I call the class of '13. But the EBITDA multiple was -- I can tell you is the class for '13 was less than 10.

Okay, that's fine. And then just a brief follow-up here. Knowles, is there -- are there costs of preparing for spin that are impacting Knowles' margins at all? Are there anything that -- anything -- or even on the top line, is there distractions and such that may explain some weakness there?

No, I don't think the spin preparation process has impacted the revenue. There's probably some very minor spending that's included in their earnings and reflected in their margins that's related to the spin. But I'm going to tell you again, it would be rather minor.

I think there are some minor overhead adds as well as they get prepared to spin in terms of resources and adding headcount. That's normal for preparing for a spin. That's in their fourth quarter, again, but not a big number at this stage.

Your next question is from Jeff Sprague with Vertical Research.

Just a couple of things. First, in terms of your guidance for 2014, can you give us a sense of how the segments fall within the band of those -- that organic outlook? Is there any particular outlier to the upside or down?

Well, if you look at our guidance of 3% to 4% organic, I would tell you that Energy is slightly higher than that range and the others are centered in the range.

Okay. Brad, I was wondering on the tax rate...

Not a wide disparity between the segments, Jeff.

Right. Right. Brad, I was wondering on tax rate, obviously, you knew the step-up was coming with kind of mix shift from the spin-off and you've been working on things. How do you view that 31% for '14 in the context of what a couple more years of tax planning might allow you to do? Is there a clear downside to that number?

Yes, great question. Yes -- no, great question. I think -- I just want to say that, first of all, we are seeing -- I want to just go back to we are seeing a lower pro forma rate as we move into '14 by about 60 basis points or so. That's really driven by the things we're doing to drive that rate as we go forward to a lower result. I think I mentioned at one point that -- I mentioned at one point that we were looking to do things in Europe with our businesses to make them more of a principal agent-type structure. We got that completed. That was part of this Markem-Imaje restructuring we were talking about. So that's been helpful to us. Our rate also, as you know, does not include, at this stage, any R&D credits. So that would help that to 30 to 40 bps lower that gets reinstated. As I think about it going forward, right now, you hear us talk a lot about our international investment and international increase in revenue streams. Over the next, say, the mid-term, I'm confident to say that I will see that rate drop down below 30%, high 20s. That's our target.

So it's a 2- or 3-year type of thing?

Yes, that's a 2- or 3-year type of thing.

And then finally maybe, just back to Bob, just margins in Energy, there's some impact you called out obviously. There's some mix impact in there. How do you feel about margins from here? Are they kind of defensible at this run rate? Is there still a little bit of downward bias, do you think?

Jeff, I was -- I think we closed the year '13 with margins at Energy at 20%, 24%, 24.1%. And that's sort of have been the target we've had for the guys for '13. And I think I responded to a question either on the October call or the July call about margins for Energy for '13, I think we ended up right where we thought they would be. As we move into '14, I expect margins for our Energy to be just about where they are right now. We'll see a little bit of noise throughout the year, but I would still expect margins for the year to center on that 24% number.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question is from Steve Tusa with JPMorgan. Charles Stephen Tusa - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: On the -- I guess, on the margins for the other main segment, the engineered business, how do you -- what do we -- how do we feel about next year for that -- for those guys? For '14, sorry.

May be a 10- to 15-bps improvement. Charles Stephen Tusa - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Okay, so then -- so if, I guess, if they were up, that means that the product ID margins are down or no?

I would say they're flat or about the same.

About the same, yes. Charles Stephen Tusa - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Okay. Okay. And then there's a few companies that have come out and talked about a little bit of volatility, I guess, in the revenues and earnings kind of fourth quarter to first quarter for a lot of companies. I guess, just that kind of a choppy economy here, but any dynamics in the first quarter? Or as the kind of growth sequences over the next -- seasonally over the next 4 quarters, do we need to think about maybe just organic growth rate to start the year?

Good question. So let me give you a comment on the year first. If you look at the absolute numbers on revenue, the first half is actually fairly equal to the second half. They were very, very similar in revenue for both halves of the year. And Steve, you would continue to see the same type of seasonality in our profile that you've seen in the past, where the second quarter and the third quarter are the higher quarters and the seasonal impact that's seen in the first quarter and fourth quarter. But it's -- you're -- you just wouldn't see anything different in our profile from what you've seen in the past. Charles Stephen Tusa - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Okay. So you said year-over-year of kind of 3% to 4%. That's what you expect, you expect organically in the first quarter.

Yes, on an organic response, the -- I think the first half rate, it's in the 3% to 4% range in the first half. And it's in the 3% to 4% range, maybe pushing towards the higher end of the 4% in the second half.

The next question is from John Inch with Deutsche Bank.

Hey, Bob, last quarter, you called out Comm Tech. I think you said there was about 25 million that was really related to delayed product launches. Did you get that back in the fourth quarter? Called it out as a deferral. I'm just wondering if you got it back.

Well, in essence, you don't. But by the time we hit -- by the time we were exiting the third quarter and entering the fourth quarter, John, we were at, I call it full production rates on all 3 of the acoustic product lines.

Okay. But is there anything you can actually state?

Fourth quarter revenue came in just about on top of what we expected.

Okay. That's what I was looking for. Bob, is there anything you can actually say about the first quarter in terms of the environment, how it's trending for Knowles? Not specifically, but clearly we're all sort of watching these sort of negative pre-announcements on smartphone volumes from Samsung and Apple. And I'm just curious, I mean, you guys seem to have a bit of a better mousetrap, right, than just the smartphone industry. So how -- is there anything you can kind of say about the cadence of the business?

I'm not going to say too much, John. I will remind you that the team at Knowles has scheduled their own Investor Day. I think it's for the 19th of February and I am almost certain that that's going to be webcast. But the first quarter profile for Knowles will show the, I call it the normal seasonality that you would see post a product launch and proceeding the next product launch.

Right. Okay. Well, that makes sense. And then just sort of as a technical question, post the spin of Knowles, that will have 3 segment, but you're still going to have some Comm Tech assets. I mean, is your plan, Bob and Brad, to have still 3 segments and you put some of the Comm Tech stuff in the other businesses? Or are you very going to create a fourth segment and, I don't know, maybe take some of your Energy business assets and put them in that because Energy is big or something. I don't know.

We'll share a little bit more detail around this post-spin, but you're asking about numbers. I happen to like the number 4, John.

Yes, that's kind of where I was going. Okay.

Your next question is from Nigel Coe with Morgan Stanley.

So you provided some good detail on the remaining co. Obviously, Knowles, we haven't gotten any guidance for Knowles. Anything you can say at this stage or do we have to wait until the 19th?

I think I have said everything I'm going to say on Knowles. It's a great story. The guys are getting prepared for their Investor Day on the 19th. And I think they're going to have an interesting and an exciting and enthusiastic message for their investor base on the 19th.

Okay, as I suspected. Obviously, you put on a fairly, I'd say, cautious look at the margins for '14. And obviously, you've got a pretty significant investment headwind in your bridge. And I'm wondering, if we switch just back to Energy, you've got the M&A dilution coming through in 4Q. I'm assuming that, that still is going to be a factor in the first half of the year. So I'm wondering, number one, how dilutive will the margins be, so [indiscernible] to Energy margins in '14, particularly in the first half of the year? And the second part of that point is how much of that investment headwind is coming through in Energy versus the other segments?

Okay. I don't have that detail here on margins by quarter for '14. Let me go back to my earlier comment about the revenue balance between first half and second half. Even though the revenue, even though the revenue is fairly balanced between first half and second half, I think you're going to see our margins a little bit better in the second half than they are in the first half, partly because -- and here's 2 or 3 key points here. Number one, we will continue to see a little bit of margin pressure here in the first 2 or 3 months of the year from some of the acquisitions that have been completed or that -- or that were completed, especially in the fourth quarter of last year. We've got some consolidation projects underway, Nigel, both here in the States as well as in Europe, some of them related to acquisitions that were completed last year, others are, I call it more normal productivity type of consolidation projects. And some of the costs we're growing to incur on those consolidation projects will be borne and reported here on the first half results. And the benefits that we'll receive from those projects will start to flow through in the second half. So even though the revenue is pretty evenly split, you're going to see a little bit better performance in the second half on margins than the first half.

Okay. And the -- so the -- just to clarify, the consolidation activity, this is like a little more of a restructuring type of...

I think a couple of days, we've even already talked about. We've got a significant project underway at Hill PHOENIX with the new facility coming online. And that new facility, I think, replaces 3 rooftop spreads, 3 or 4 rooftops. And the, again, the cost we're going to incur on that consolidation is first half and the benefits we'll see in the second half. Within Energy, we've got new facility coming online down in Houston, actually as we speak. It will be here in the first quarter. And that new facility I think, again, replaces 4?

3 or 4.

3 or 4 rooftops. And the cost again of, I call it the move and the consolidation is a first half expense and we'll start to see the benefits show up in the second half. We have a couple of other projects similar to that, that will be in Europe this year.

Your next question is from Julian Mitchell with Crédit Suisse. Julian Mitchell - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Yes, I just wanted to follow up on the EPS bridge. On the volume mix and price line, I guess, if you take sort of $0.22 at the middle of that, it implies maybe a 20% incremental margin for the year as a whole of about 3.5 core growth. I just wondered if that's factoring in some kind of hit or impact from FX? Because it sounds a fairly low number. I understand you have some facilities and so on in the first half. If there was anything sort of abnormal or anything in FX that's maybe weighing on the incrementals?

No, I would say your calculation is pretty good. We -- I'd say it's somewhere -- the conversion is somewhere between 23% and 25% the way we think about it on organic growth, which is pretty consistent with what we saw in 2013. Keep in mind that we do put into that line item, not only volume conversion, but mix and material -- cost material spread. And I would say while materials are behaving fairly well going into the first part of 2014, right now, we view that in our forecast to be slightly -- a slight drag, not that large, but a slight drag on that conversion rate. Julian Mitchell - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Got it. And then just my follow-up in terms of the kind of geographic color, you called out Europe was up over 10% in Q4. I guess, when you're thinking about '14 and the 3 to 4 core growth globally, what's the sort of main assumption there? Is that 3-ish in the Europe and the U.S. and a bit more in Rest of World? Or how quickly do you think that Europe number normalizes?

I think your guess is pretty close for modeling, 3 to -- a little bit lower in Europe and the U.S. and a little bit higher in the emerging markets. We continue to see good and interesting opportunities for growth in China and other parts of Asia. You'll see us do a little bit more in South America in 2014, maybe even a bit more than we've done in the last couple of years. But we do look at the U.S. and Europe to be, I would call it low to -- low single-digit contributors to organic growth in '14.

Your next question is from Nathan Jones with Stifel. Nathan Jones - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: I wonder if I could start with a refrigeration question and talking specifically about Anthony. You've got some pretty nice bookings there. I know you're expecting to see some revenue synergies from Anthony. Have you started to realize those? And how meaningful are they to the business at this point?

Well, we have been realizing some of those revenue synergies throughout the year. I would say it's been building, especially as we got beyond the first quarter. Nathan, I can't give you a number on that. I just don't have that. We had a very solid second half in our refrigeration business. The profile was a bit different between the third quarter and the fourth quarter. The -- I would call it the core refrigeration business, our case in systems business actually was fairly strong in the third and the fourth quarter. And our Anthony business actually was performing pretty much -- very much on plan on our acquisition model through the first, not only 3 quarters, maybe even through the first 10 or 10.5 months. We did see some deferrals late in the fourth quarter that would move into 2014 and it's not in the core grocery business. We see it more in, I call it the smaller format stores like the convenience stores and, perhaps, even sold it more out of North America than we did here in the U.S. Nathan Jones - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay, that's helpful. And my follow-up is on the...

So we're looking for another great year for those guys next year. Nathan Jones - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Wonderful. My follow-up is on the international expansion on Energy. Can you talk about -- and I mean outside U.S., Canada and Europe, 50% growth in 2013? And I know it's been a strategic goal for you to expand...

No, I actually think it was 50% in the fourth quarter for... Nathan Jones - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: 50% in the fourth quarter?

Yes. For '13, I think it was 40, 42 or 43 for the year, yes. Nathan Jones - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: I know that's been a strategic goal for you to expand that business. How meaningful is that to the business now? And what kind of growth rates do you think you can do over the next 2 or 3 years outside of those typical Canada, U.S. and the Europe?

Okay. So when I talk about the geographic expansion and we -- and I gave you this number of 40%, 42% and 50%, what I'm referring to is the growth and what I would label as new markets for Energy. So I'm excluding or including as the core, not just North America, but I'm including as the core, Europe. Okay. I want to make that point first. As a percentage of the total, these new geo expansion initiatives, perhaps, now account for about 18% of the Energy segments revenue. So it's rather significant. Gosh, I think we don't have to roll the clock back much beyond 3 years and we'd only see that number to be 5% or 6% of the segment's revenue. We will continue. We are continuing to add resources, people resources around the world for the Energy segment, as I commented in my opening comments. I would love to sit here and tell you that you'll see 40% growth every year for the next 5 years. The math sort of starts to work against us a little bit. We will continue to see significant growth opportunities for Energy, especially around artificial lift during the next 2 to 3 years. But you should expect that growth to come -- the growth rate to moderate significantly. It's representing 18% of their revenue today.

And your final question is with Jamie Sullivan with RBC Capital.

You talked pretty positively about the Energy trajectory in 2014 and pretty balanced throughout the end markets. Maybe you can just talk a little bit about some of the underpinnings of the assumptions there, whether there's some visibility in international markets or projects, maybe you can just provide a little bit more color on the Energy growth.

Okay. So let me -- I guess, the key assumption or the underpinning behind our guidance and forecast for Energy for '14 would be our take on what we're going to see in rig count activity here in North America. That's always where we start. We actually -- we are -- our assumption is that rig count in both U.S. as well as in North America for 2014 is actually flat with '13. I know there's some reports out there that show rig count activity to be forecasted to be up modestly, but our assumption is that it will be flat. That said, even with the flat rig count, we continue to see and expect increased well activity in 2014. I would call it mid-single-digit increase in well activity. Outside of North America, we continue to see more and more, I call it tender projects that we feel that we should be participants in. That's been a significant part of the growth that we've had in our Energy business over the last couple of years. And we see that continuing into '14 and beyond.

That's very helpful. And then just a follow-up, there's been a fair amount of talk of FX on the earnings call this far. What's baked into the guidance and maybe just what the impact is in '14?

That -- I'm sorry, you were fading a bit. You're asking what is the impact of FX in our '14 guidance?

Yes, I was just saying that FX has been a topic of your conversation through the earnings call. I was just wondering what's in the guidance for '14?

Yes, sorry. Our guidance would be pretty neutral for Dover. Keep in mind that some of these markets that have seen quite a bit of activity or change in the valuation of their currencies, we're not a big player in some of those markets. So at this point, our forecast is built on pretty steady assumption around FX.

Thank you. That does conclude our question-and-answers period. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Goldberg for closing remarks.

Thanks, Jennifer. This concludes our conference call. As usual, we're very happy that you joined us this morning and we look forward to talking to you again next quarter. Have a good day.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. That concludes today's Fourth Quarter 2013 Dover Corporation Earnings Conference Call. You may now disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.