Hello, and welcome to the Dynatrace's Second Quarter Fiscal 2022 Earnings Call and Webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Noelle Faris, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining Dynatrace's second quarter fiscal '22 earnings conference call. With me on the call today are John Van Siclen, Chief Executive Officer; and Kevin Burns, Chief Financial Officer. Before we get started, please note that today's comments include forward-looking statements such as statements regarding revenue and earnings guidance. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties depending on a number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Additional information concerning these uncertainties and risk factors is contained in Dynatrace's filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements included in this call represent the company's views on October 27, 2021. Dynatrace disclaims any obligation to update these statements to reflect future events or circumstances. As a reminder, we will be referring to some non-GAAP financial measures during today's call. A detailed reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP measures can be found on the Investor Relations section of our website. And with that, let me turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, John Van Siclen. John?

Thanks, Noelle. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. First, let me start by sharing how extremely proud I am with the team's performance this quarter. Once again, beating guidance across all our key operating metrics. ARR was $864 million, up 35% year-over-year and subscription revenue was $213 million, also up 35% year-over-year. Once again, we balance these strong top line metrics with solid bottom line performance as well, which Kevin will elaborate on a few minutes. We continue to believe that a smart balance between growth and profitability makes for a more durable business. Underpinning our consistent year-over-year top line ARR growth above 30% are two key building blocks net new logos to the Dynatrace platform and the ongoing expansion of existing customers. I'm pleased to report that we added 160 new logo customers to the Dynatrace platform in Q2 up 20% from a year-ago. And that net expansion rate fueled by growth across all modules was once again at or above 120%. The consistent execution against these two building blocks we believe will sustain a 30 plus percent growth business at scale for some years to come. With the strength of our Q2 results and positive outlook ahead, we're increasing our guidance for fiscal 2022, which Kevin will provide more detail on shortly. This morning, I'd like to provide an update on the three topics that I believe will continue to drive Dynatrace's momentum and success. First, the ongoing market dynamics that continue to drive new logo growth and rapid expansion within our growing customer base. Second, the progress we're making in commercial expansion to accelerate go-to-market success. And third, the progress we are making and expanding our platform and module strength to address the full $50 billion TAM, we see ahead of us. Let…

Thank you, John. And good morning everyone. As John mentioned, we delivered another great quarter on both the top and bottom line, setting this up for stronger fiscal '22. The investments we have made in sales productivity and commercial expansion are evident across all of our top line metrics with ARR above our internal expectations and revenue and subscription revenue exceeding our guidance. ARR for the second quarter was $864 million. That's up $226 million year-over-year representing 35% growth or 34% in constant currency. Excluding the perpetual license headwind, which was roughly $25 million. Our adjusted ARR growth rate was 39% on an as reported basis, and 38% on a constant currency basis. That's up 200 basis points sequentially from Q1. Please keep in mind our ARR as reported was impacted by currency movements and I will cover that component when I review the full-year ARR guide. The building blocks for sustained ARR growth remained the same. The addition of new logos to the Dynatrace platform combined with the ability to expand existing customer relationships, as measured by our net expansion rate. As John discussed, new logo growth continues to be strong, and it was up 33% for the first half to 295 new logos. We continue to see positive traction across all of our regions. With notable strength in EMEA and North America. We ended the quarter with more than 3100 Dynatrace customers. At the same time, existing customers continue to see the value of the Dynatrace platform, adopting new modules and expanding coverage. This is evident in our net expansion rate, which for the 14th consecutive quarter was at or above 120%. As a result, our ARR per Dynatrace customer continues to increase. And in Q2, it was $277,000, an increase of 19% year-over-year. In addition, we continue…

Thank you. We'll now be conducting your question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today is coming from Matt Hedberg from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now live.

Great. Thanks guys for taking my questions. Congrats on the quarter the adjusted currency ARR acceleration on a sequential basis, it was super impressive. John, I guess, as you alluded to in your script, one of the biggest drivers seems to be the growth in just cloud applications and workload. And I wonder if you could talk about that dynamic a bit more really in the scope of the hyperscale sort of the size and scale? All of this isn't that new workload? I guess the question also was, what does this mean for the percentage of deals that are really Greenfield today, in what I think a lot of people see as a more competitive market for observability solutions?

Well, thank you, Matt. And good question. You're right in that. We're seeing the Greenfield space increase for us. As this market expands, and shifts from sort of a tool layered market into an observability market. The dynamic cloud environments that our customers find themselves in now, they realize that old tooling isn't something that they can live with it actually fails, they actually fail. And so there's a scramble for new tooling. Many of the customers start with just trying to cobble things together themselves. And when we show up, it's a pretty open opportunity for us to provide a platform approach that accelerates their ability to regain control over their environment, which gives them the kind of visibility they need to scale faster and at lower risk. So we're seeing that that Greenfield actually open up for us from what we saw when we first IPO a couple years ago. And it is accelerating growth in a number of areas.

That's super helpful. And then maybe as a follow-up, the - you continue to add new sales rep at a rapid pace. I guess I'm wondering, what is the plan for sales reps getting back on the road face-to-face meetings? And if they do so to a greater extent, do you think that could have start to have a positive sort of incremental benefit to pipeline generation?

Well, we're already back on the road actually, and around the world, and the sales organizations been pretty sort of thoughtful and but aggressive that's re-engaging both customers, as well as prospect opportunities. And I do believe with our direct approach to the global 15,000 especially since we call on sort of director level and above in organizations that that the direct face-to-face will help accelerate pipelines especially in the new logo area.

Thank you. Next question is coming from Raimo Lenschow from Barclays. Your line is now live.

Hey, thank you. Congrats from me as well. Can I stay on that topic a little bit, John? If you think about the sales expansion and the new functionalities you're getting there, it's like how do you think about that motion around sales expansion in terms of overly kind of specialized on the new modules versus kind of guy to kind of tell the whole portfolio? And then follow-up for Kevin there's like you expanded the sales by 30%, what's the notion? Or what's the situation on sales productivity? How's that tracking for you? Thank you.

Sure, well so most of our sellers, back all the direct sellers handle the entire portfolio. So there's no confusion over who's calling on what account or how we manage agreements with customers, there's no friction at the point of customer and that's, we think that that's very important. There are certain most products are actually very similar in that they complement various dimensions of observability. The only outlier is the AppSec module, which does have a separate overlay team to help with some of the specialized selling skills around security, especially with the CISOs. So that's the only one but we're getting great cross sell now, a year and a half ago, we talked about, hey, when we're done with our conversion program, we'll lean into cross sell, and we built quite strong muscle there. And you can see those in the numbers, the fact that three plus modules continue to climb every quarter at a steady pace. And that's without really sort of AppSec and the new cloud automation module kicking in yet. So we just see that, that that our motion is strong, the sales organization and partner organizations have embraced it. And we're executing well to that multi-module strategy that we talked about two years ago, and are now executing against today.

Hi, Raimo, Kevin. Just to follow-up on your question around productivity. So first of all, it's been great over the last couple of years, as you know, we've been stepping on the gas in terms of the sales acceleration growing that organization 20%, 25% in this past quarter growing 30 plus percent. So super excited there. I'd also say that's noteworthy is we're doing a great job, given the company's brand visibility awareness of attracting great talent across the organization. And we've invested a lot in onboarding and bringing those people up to speed as well. So that whole commercial engine is working extremely well, we obviously keep an eye on productivity, I think generally our view on productivity is if we start to see it creeping up too much, then what we want to do is probably go out and lay around a few more sales reps. To keep productivity relatively flat, our goal is not to lean on certain part of the organization too heavily. We want everybody to be productive. And when we sort of hit productivity levels, we step on the gas a little bit more.

Okay, perfect. Thank you. Well done.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from DJ Hynes from Canaccord Genuity. Your line is now live.

Hey, thanks guys. And congrats also in the quarter, John, is the partner influence deals continue to increase as a part of the mix, right via through the size of the hyperscalers. Is there any notable difference in the typical profile of those deals versus what you're attracting and closing directly?

DJ no, not really. We've had this partner of Operation for quite a while now. And it does take a little while to get them up to speed and gain momentum. But they really become quite a strong augmentation to our sales, our direct sales engine. And so the type of deals are relatively similar. What is a little bit different is that the global SI's think of, so they're more general contractors? So their deals will include five, six, 10 different piece parts of an entire cloud transformation project and ecosystem and will be a piece of it. So from that standpoint, you might say, well, that's different in how they move and what their motion is in the market. But the kind of deal and use cases and so on that they use they bring Dynatrace in for very similar to the kinds of deals we do directly.

Yes, okay, that's helpful. And then Kevin as a follow-up. Is there any way to get a bit more granular on the trends you're seeing in dollar base net retention, is it improving? Is it staying the same? I know kind of north of 120 is kind of the default comment. And maybe as part of that, like there are multiple levers to expansion. So maybe just unpack maybe what's having the most impacts there?

Sure. So I think some of the visibility we put this out actually in our investor deck, but we break out the expansion between two companies DJ. So if we breakout ARR growth between what's coming from new logos and what's coming from expansion in the base. And if I just sort of mentioned the last couple of quarters, when we've been growing 30 plus percent, 24% growth has been coming from expanding in the base that was in the fourth quarter. And over the last couple of quarters that stepped up. So in Q2, I'm sorry in Q1, that went to 25%. And then in Q2, that went to 27%. So that's sort of an indicator of that net expansion rate. As you know, we don't specifically give you the net expansion rate, but expansion from the base has been growing, which is contributing to the overall ARR growth.

Yes, perfect. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. Our next question today is coming from Sterling Auty from JPMorgan. Your line is now live.

Yes, thanks. Hi, guys. That's perfect timing. So maybe to segue on that question is, when you look at that net expansion, how much of that is more modules versus more applications?

It's actually the module expansion beyond applications is growing a little bit faster than the applications. But I won't say that it's materially faster, because application expansion is, as I've said before, it's sort of an evergreen environment. Everybody's adding more applications, every application is scaling further than it was a quarter or two ago. And so it's because we're consumption based, it continue growth environment for us just in the application side alone. And we really only have I mean, we still believe we're still early innings we're at most 15% to 20% penetrated in the application areas where we believe that most customers would like to have 50% to 60% of their applications monitored by sort of a deep wide technology like a Dynatrace. So lots of room to grow there, and no question that we have even more room to grow on the module side. So, I think we're just going to, we're doing a good job of executing, but there's so much more room to go. It's a wonderful market.

That makes sense. And maybe one quick follow-up, when you look at the new business in the quarter, how would you characterize the mix of that business that's for observability on Azure versus AWS versus GCP versus private cloud versus something else?

You know the 80% or so of our customer base, and this includes new logos, at least 80%, probably closer to 90% are coming to us because of our expertise in modern cloud environments, whether they're public cloud, Kubernetes, orchestrated cloud native application environments. It's a combination of all those that really drives our business. The fact that we are extremely strong in the hybrid extension side is just another reason for why the global 15,000, the digital transformers out there, favor Dynatrace. So they can get a real Indian view as they're migrating from the old to the new. But what drives our business is where companies are headed. And that is modern cloud, modern workload everywhere.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Jonathan Ruykhaver from Baird. Your line is now live.

Yes, good morning guys. And congrats on the performance. So, John, we're starting to see some of these DevOps platform vendors, notably GitLab talk about their ability to drive value across the entire DevOps lifecycle including observability. And I'm just kind of curious, how you view that position from a DevOps perspective and the focus on that center? Did you view it as a potential competitive impact over time?

Well, the short answer is, we don't view it as competitive impact over time because what we do sort of sets up above the CI CD tool chain kind of approach out there. And having intelligent, automated observability along the path and the same sort of tooling between deployment to production to sunsetting of legacy or outdated code at scale requires a little bit different kind of platform, and different kind of approach than sort of that multi-tool approach that pretty much everybody has an including GitLab. So it's a compliment for sure, but not a competitive kind of situation the way we view it.

Okay, that's helpful. The second question I have, it might be more for Kevin, but you've talked about potentially churning us a few 100 lower value accounts. So I'm wondering if you could just talk about how that has progressed including - are you seeing success maybe turning those accounts into more meaningful platform customers, and then on the other hand, if you aren't seeing some churn on those customers, anyway to quantify what kind of impact that might be to ARR?

Yes, so we've mentioned that there are a few 100 customers that were single module customers, and a lot of these customers have been running one of our synthetic products - with synthetic monitoring products. And we have sort of seen some turnover that in the last couple quarters on that. We also do land some new logos, you know, not want at this point, but some new logos, with single modules, but we've been very successful in terms of growing those customers to multi module more observability players over time. So yes, we're seeing the churn as we communicated I think in our fourth quarter costs, nothing sort of out of line there. Keep in mind that customer segment when you look at it from an ARR standpoint, it's sort of mid-single million dollar AR number. So not meaningful from an AR standpoint and not meaningful from a customer count standpoint.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Jack Andrews from Needham & Company. Your line is now live.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I want to ask maybe a two part question. And the first part is, could you speak to what types of metrics your enterprise customers are focused on deriving from their observability solutions these days, being that is it still just about number of critical incidents and things like me time to resolution, or are they increasingly looking to tie observability to potential business outcomes like measuring net promoter score for example?

More and more these customers are trying to tie together sort of the business impact of that, IT platform and tool chain. In other words, measuring results around user experience against different kind of app decks indexes and so on, or relative to conversion rates, or abandoned carts, and that kind of direct connect to business outcomes. And it's one of the unique and powerful aspects of Dynatrace is that we actually connect the dots between all the rest of the plumbing, all the applications and services with the actual outcomes themselves to give operators a very good well focused approach to how they should optimize where they should troubleshoot, and how they should manage their innovation investments to improve their business results. So it is a growing trend, and one that we're excited about and well positioned for.

Well, thanks for the color on that. And just as a quick follow-up. Could you maybe expand on your comments in terms of how you're thinking about M&A in other particular aspects of your platform that you think might make sense to perhaps acquire capabilities rather than the building organically?

Yes, great question. Our approach has always been platform first, because we believe that's easier for customers to manage, to operate and we can apply greater degrees of automation and AI against used cases if we sort of manage all the components of that platform. And so technology tuck-ins therefore fit extremely well in that strategy and we've started to do. We announced our SpectX acquisition. And as we find additional similar kinds of talented teams that can accelerate roadmaps materially will be acquisitive. And it just it makes sense, where we have a large enough portfolio, Kevin talked about sort of the cash generation of the business. And we want to put that to work in whatever way we can to continue to extend our differentiation and drive top line growth.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from Koji Ikeda from Bank of America. Your line is now live.

Hi, John and Kevin, very nice quarter. And thank you for taking my questions. I guess this is a follow up. We're just to dig in on that M&A strategy. You know, thinking about the SpectX acquisition. It's been about six weeks now since the acquisition closed. So couple of questions here. First, around the technology that was acquired. I guess, how much did it accelerate the roadmap for high speed parsing and analytics for Dynatrace? And as SpectX a good way to think about the inorganic roadmap acceleration strategy? And then I guess, second, it's still early, but how has the initial reaction been with the partners and customers out there?

Yes, good question. So first of all, I'd say that from a roadmap standpoint, I'd say 18 to 24-month kind of bump forward, which is significant. Second of all, we believe that first parts of their technology will be infused into our platform in somewhere between six and nine months from closing the acquisition, which is about the right kind of timeframe that we think about when we think tuck-in, and the feedback that we've gotten from customers and partners have been two thumbs up, what's next and what else do you have up your sleeve kind of thing? So, we've done these before, we did one a couple years ago, we found it to be highly successful. And Kevin and I see more in our future where they make sense. Now, they'll be smart. There'll be tuck-ins. And but we'll be aggressive in life as I said extending our differentiation. And driving top line growth.

Got it. Thanks, John. And maybe a follow up for Kevin if I may. I was hoping we could dig into the FX impact a bit more. Can you help us understand a bit more granularly around what regions are driving the FX impacts we're seeing right now?

Yes, so for the year as I mentioned in the call are as reported guidance was reduced by about $15 million or sort of two percentage points of growth related to FX. A majority of that came as a result of the dollar strengthening primarily against the euro and the pound, and also the Australian dollar. So those are sort of three major currencies that we're operating in, where we saw the currency movement towards the end of the second quarter. So that's sort of resulted in that as reported impact. But as we said in the call, and what we'd like investors to focus on is certainly the constant currency ARR growth, which we increased by about 250 basis points at the midpoint for the years. So trying to normalize out that any of that FX headwind there.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from Gray Powell from BTIG. Your line is now live.

Great, thanks for taking the questions. Just a couple of my side. So last quarter, you highlighted, I think 45% of customers use infrastructure monitoring outside of full-stack. Any update there? And then for customers that are taking infrastructure monitoring outside of full-stack APM? How much are they spending on the product? Like, if you're spending $100 per year in APM? What does infrastructure add today? And where could it go?

Yes, so we just dropped some of the side data, but think of it as about a 5%, increase in the customer base on a quarter-over-quarter basis, I mean, we're doing extremely well, selling cross selling that module in with the full-stack customers. And when you think about how many cents on the dollar versus the full-stack application microservices module, think about it as probably today, maybe we're in the $0.15 to $0.20 on the dollar kind of range. And there, it can clearly be dollar for dollar, there's a lot of infrastructure, kind of workloads in that, by the way is log analytics for us because we package that together in our infrastructure module. So there's a lot of dimensions of expansion for that module with every customer we have. So like I said, we're excited about its maturity. I can go toe-to-toe with anyone and cross-sell is going very well with that module in particular. It's a key driver of the three plus module growth as well.

Got it. Okay. That's really helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from Kamil Mielczarek from William Blair. Your line is now live.

Thank you. Hi, congrats on the third quarter. John, you said in the past that a third of customers land with the three or more module platform approach. And you've attributed this, I think, last quarter to the move toward observability as a landing zone away from applications as a landing zone. So in that context, I'd like to better understand how you expect the size of new lands to trend long-term. How do you expect that landing zone to evolve? And is there a point where you choose to limit the growth in new lands in favor of maybe a faster pace of new logo wins and then faster expansion rates? Or should we expect the size of new logo ASPs to trend up for the foreseeable future?

That's definitely a key question that we continue to ask ourselves, because the speed of new logo acquisitions is a really important long-term growth driver for us. So that's why you've seen that landing zone stay pretty constant. But I will say when we IPO a couple years ago, it was more in the 90K to 95K. And now it's in the 105K to 110K. So it has been creeping up and that's that creep has been more modules on day one. So the shift to observability definitely has some impact to it. No question about that. And I do believe that it will continue to creep up. Okay, it won't jump up, but it will creep up. As more and more landing zones are - our observability a broader platform approach, which is today, as you pointed out about a third is that approach is 50% obviously that that that will impact that landing zone number. I think we'll always try to keep it pretty close to the 100K, maybe it gets to 120K, 125K. But, even there, it's still up, it's still not, it's not too high for a billion dollar business, who's digitally transforming to try something new. That just might work better than advertised, fulfill the promises that many have had that have fallen short. So I still think it's in the right zone, but I do expect it to creep up over time.

That's helpful. Thank you. And a quick follow-up for Kevin. Current RPO was up in high 30s. Billings on a trailing 12 month basis up close to 40% I think. ARR after adjustments also high 30s. So why aren't we seeing that kind of growth rate in revenue yet? What's causing divergence? And is it fair to expect ARR and revenue growth to converge sometime on next few years?

So I think what we're seeing so. So first of all, from an RPO standpoint, yes, I think we're very pleased in the growth of that. We've got implemented one contract, one price. We're also doing a lot of more rip and replace and accelerating growth with our customer base and extending the three-year deal. So that's sort of driving that that RPO growth. But the more important metric, I think, as you appreciate is the ARR growth. And that's been growing nicely. And subscription revenue, I think that's the metric that you need to think about. And I think those will start to converge, there's a little bit of a dynamic in the subscription revenue do the perpetual license wind down. But as we get through that transition here, over the next quarter - couple of quarters, you will start to see the ARR growth rate and subscription growth rate, essentially marry each other. But I think that's probably four to six quarters away. So there's - there'll be a slight discrepancy between those two metrics at this point. But again, they're both grown pretty nicely and both converge over time.

Thank you. Next question today is coming from Keith Bachman from Bank of Montreal. Your line is now live.

Hi, thank you. I wanted to focus on security for my first question. Could you give us an update on where you are in terms of potential traction over the next 12 months and going back to the dollar-for-dollar opportunity set? How would you characterize it now that you've had a couple more quarters to at least observe it, and what the potential is, but if you could just give us an update on security including how the recent M&A may impact your thoughts there? And then I have a follow-up if I could.

Sure, Keith. So things are still going extremely well with that module. We've introduced it now to about 20% of our customer base, trialed it in about 10%, feedback is still the same that we've heard before, this is a - there's nothing like this is a Greenfield opportunity for us. And it just needed a few sort of pieces to be mature enough for a global 15,000 CISO to approve. And we're at that point now, and a combination of coverage, as well as sort of operational automation, capabilities of how it fits in a DevSecOps environment. So those have been the two key technology elements to add. We see this quarter are really the second half of this year as a scale up of customers and growth opportunities. But it's still office a super small number, so you won't see it really in any ARR impact until fiscal '23. But that's consistent with what we said about a year ago, when we talked about it, I think it was either December or January that we introduced the AppSec module. And we're on track maybe a little bit ahead of track actually. As far as acquisitions go and sort of impact over time. Today with the functionality we have, we think it's, we're probably able to capture maybe $0.20 on a full stack dollar. But with the roadmap we have, a year from now we'll be capturing $0.50 on the full stack dollar and where we are two years from now we think it's clearly should be a dollar-for-dollar with the observability suite.

Perfect. Okay.

A lot of room to scale up.

Yes. Well, that relates to [indiscernible] your customers are three plus modules and I think your total module offering is six. How would you think investors should consider what that looks like three years from now? In other words, does your model - module offering double over the next three to five years? Or how should we be thinking about the potential for portfolio expansion over the next three plus years?

So first of all, let me just start with the way we package modules is different than others. We packaged by use cases, which includes multiple sort of features and components things other people might call products. We'll package them all around use cases. So, it's a different kind of packaging strategy, which fits our global 15,000 customer a little bit better. So we'll never have a massive amount of modules, but we will continue to gradually increase the modules over time. I think with the way, we'll end up talking about in this a little speculative, but I think you knew assist are start talking a little bit about four plus module, five plus module customers. But the key I think is the movement of ARR for customer like, how do you go from a landing zone of a 100,000 in ARR to a million dollar ARR, which we believe all of our customers can reach and exceed. And I think that that's really right now, we're talking about three plus modules, because you can see as close to 500,000, halfway there. You add a fourth and a fifth, and you keep growing. And it's really underpins our thesis of that expansion above 120% for a pretty long time to come. And that's a key part of our entire growth strategy to stay above 30% over the long-term.

Thank you. We've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any further closing comments.

I appreciate your attendance today, support for the business. Just leave you with a few thoughts. First of all, we believe our business has never been stronger. Our - this was our very strong financial quarter for us business results. And one of our stronger guides actually when you take it in constant currency. So we're thrilled about that. Teams extremely strong, proven and our execution ability has never been better as well. So we're thrilled for the future and look forward to catching up at the - at our next call in January or early February when we talk about Q3 results. Thank you very much.

Thank you. And that does conclude today's teleconference call and webcast. You may now disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.