Greetings and welcome to the DoubleVerify First Quarter 2021 Financial Results. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions]. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to our host Tejal Engman of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining us to discuss DoubleVerify’s first quarter 2021 financial results. With me today is Mark Zagorski, CEO; and Nicola Allais, CFO. Before we begin, I’d like to remind everyone that statements made on this call and responses in Q&A today contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties and changes, and reflect our current expectations based on our beliefs, assumptions and information currently available to us as of today, May 25, 2021. Although we believe these expectations are reasonable, they are subject to change, and we undertake no obligation to revise any statements to reflect changes that occur after this call. You can find more information about these risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements in our recent SEC filings, including our S-1 registration statement. In addition, our discussion today will include references to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures are presented for supplemental purposes and should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or in isolation from, our GAAP results. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in today’s earnings press release, which is available on our Investor Relations website at ir.doubleverify.com. With that, I’ll turn it over to Mark.

Thank you, Tejal. Good afternoon, everyone. I am Mark Zagorski, CEO of DoubleVerify. I am excited to welcome you to our first ever earnings call, and to discuss our strong first quarter performance and optimistic outlook on the year ahead. Nicola will detail our business model and financial results, as well as provide guidance. Since this is our inaugural earnings call, before we dive into the numbers, I wanted to take a few minutes to talk about DoubleVerify, and the core value proposition that continues to propel the success of our business. DV’s story is one of sustained organic growth, helped along by strong sector tailwinds and a unique market leading position and platform that creates exceptional expansion opportunities in the mid and long term. DoubleVerify’s mission is to make digital advertising stronger, safer and more secure. We believe the advertising dollars that support the creation of diverse, high quality content, and make it accessible to the widest audience possible, depend on a transactional environment that is based on transparency and trust. Via our media quality verification and performance solutions, DoubleVerify creates greater advertising transparency and therefore protects the fair value exchange in the digital marketplace. In the process, we not only drive ROI for our brands, we ultimately keep money out of the hands of fraudsters, who often act to undermine free markets. Further, we help advance social good, by defunding misinformation and hate speech. This is important not just for our advertiser partners, but for everyone who participates in the digital ecosystem. Speaking of advertisers, our analytics platform has become a core utility for hundreds of leading global brands. From CPG companies such as Mondelez and Unilever, to media and tech innovators like Comcast and Vodafone, our tools help maximize digital ad spend and optimize ad delivery. DoubleVerify’s…

Thank you, Mark. I am pleased to report our strong first quarter results as a newly public company, giving us confidence in providing a strong outlook for the year. Our impressive performance demonstrates the strength of our customer relationships and our attractive, scalable, operating model. This quarter we continued to execute against our plan as we generated strong revenue growth, maintained high profitability while continuing to invest in the business. Before reviewing our quarter results, I want to quickly take you through our business model. DV generates revenue via a transactional software model. Our customers use DV’s software and data analytics to evaluate, target and measure the quality of their digital ad spend. For every media transaction we measure, an “MTM”, we are paid a measurement transaction fee, an “MTF”. Our revenue model is MTM times MTF. The MTF we charge is a fixed fee per transaction rather than a take rate based on our customers’ media spend. We want to measure all impressions for our customers, regardless of format, channel or media value. We grow MTM by adding new customers, by measuring additional impressions for our customers as they increase their digital ad spend, and as more digital media transactions are available for verification. We grow MTF by adding premium products that provide additional monetization opportunities for each impression we measure. Our advertiser customers, who represent over 90% of our revenue, purchase and implement DV solutions in two ways. The first way, which we track as advertiser-direct revenue, occurs when advertisers use our software platform to measure the quality and performance of ads purchased directly from digital properties, including open web publishers, social media and CTV platforms. The second way, which we track as advertiser-programmatic revenue, occurs when advertisers leverage our solutions through programmatic platforms to evaluate the quality…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Chris Merwin with Goldman Sachs.

Okay. Thanks for taking my question. And congrats to you all for such a strong first quarter out of the gate. In the prepared remarks, you talked about some recent wins in Social and CTV. Can you give us a sense of what type of uptake you’re seeing for those products among the customer base? And can you also talk a bit about the opportunity for improved data sharing from the socials and how that could be a further catalyst for adoption for those products? Thanks.

Hey, Chris, thanks for the question. Yes, we really had a strong quarter when it came to Social and CTV volume growth, and we obviously love kind of seeing that in areas, which we think are going to have great tailwinds around it. As you remember, when we go on with the client, we generally start with a core value proposition across as many media as possible and continue to upsell them solutions over time. So, in the CTV and social space, social is a bit more mature of a product set. Those usually kind of are the earlier sell-throughs. CTV is an area which we just started entering in the middle of last year. So, we think we’ve got a good amount of white space to upsell both of those solutions into both, our current client base and new clients moving ahead. So, we see a lot of potential growth in both of those areas down the road. With respect to the second part of your question around additional coverage in CTV, I think there’s two aspects of that. It’s going deeper into the social networks that we currently work with and expanding into new social networks down the road. And we believe there are opportunities on both of those fronts. Late last year, there was a public announcement by Twitter on their interest in continuing to expand partnerships with third-party validation and verification companies, naming DoubleVerify as one of those companies. So, we know there’s opportunities there as well as with the other social networks that we work with. And then, as new social networks evolve and become introduced, our drive to verify and measure everywhere means that we will work with those folks to get coverage there as well. It’s important to note that we are really a customer-driven enterprise. And wherever our customers and the big brands need us to be, we’re going to make sure that we get coverage in those new spaces.

Okay, perfect. And maybe just one quick follow-up on the outlook. It looks like kind of well ahead of where the Street is now. So, can you just talk a bit about any factors that influence that whether it’s a better-than-expected cyclical recovery or just stronger pipeline growth? Anything you can share about the outlook there would be great. Thanks.

Yes, Chris, it’s Nicola. I think, the two points you just mentioned are what is driving sort of our outlook for the rest of the year, which is a positive one. There’s clearly a cyclical component to the spend of our customers. And so, we anticipate that to help us. As you know, the first quarter is our smallest quarter. More importantly, I think the recovery is definitely something that we will participate in. We’re very diversified across industries, but as in particular, travel and entertainment comes back, we’re poised to take advantage of that recovery as well.

Our next question comes from Mark Murphy with JP Morgan.

Hi. Good afternoon. This is Matt Coss on behalf of Mark Murphy. Congratulations on your first public quarter out of the gate. I just wanted to ask a little bit more about the favorable trends, you mentioned as retail and travel opened back up. I think, the thinking was that that would be more of a sort of late 2021 impact. But, are you seeing evidence that that might be benefiting you earlier than you may have thought?

Yes. Thanks, Matt. Good question. I think we’re still kind of looking at that as the latter part of the year bounce back, particularly when it comes to kind of travel and retail. But, one of the things that I think it’s important to kind of lean into is the fact that a lot of the habits that were developed over -- during COVID as far as media ingestion and the amount of media people are consuming kind of have continued throughout this year as well. So, we’re benefiting from the tailwinds of things like social engagement and CTV engagement that are continuing to increase over time. So, I think on a industrial sector basis. We still have lots of room for that comeback. And I think we’re really looking at that as the second half of the year kind of factor.

Okay. Very helpful. And then, I know because of the comprehensiveness of your platform that’s really helped you sort of gain a foothold against some of the sort of incumbents or legacy competitors. Do you see any change in your ability with the sort of broadening of your platform to perhaps accelerate share gains in -- from your two largest competitors?

It’s another great question. I think as we’ve seen across lots of different parts of the industry, there tends to be consolidation to more complete platforms and more complete solutions. We obviously fit that bill. And as point solutions continue to lose favor with our advertiser clients, there’s an opportunity for us to continue to take share there. And we do so not just because of the completeness of our solution, but the efficacy and the power of our solution. I mean, to put it frankly, as we’ve discussed in the past, this is a software sale. And that software sale is usually driven by a competitive RFP process in which there’s a head-to-head competition. And the platform that delivers the best results is the one that gets the win. And we continue to gain share because our platform not only is complete, but delivers the best results as well.

Our next question comes from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays.

Thanks. And congrats from me as well. I have two quick questions. First, since it’s like your first call, it’s maybe slightly more basic, but I hope it’s still very relevant here. Mark, can you talk a little bit about advertiser programmatic against advertiser direct? How do you think those two will kind of play out over time? Is it going to be a mix effect and what’s driving it? And so just to get a better sense of when we start looking at the models, to think about like where the growth is coming from. And then, second question for Nicola is like, as you start investing again, can you talk a little bit about the balance between growth and margins? You talked about the rule of 60. If I look at the margins this year, they’re kind of you’re guiding for higher than last year, but it’s still below historic. Just how do you think about that dynamic?

All right. Great question, Raimo. And congrats on getting something out so quick. You’re first to the draw of getting some things out. So hopefully, this will help for what comes out next. On the advertiser programmatic and direct, I think you’ve got a couple of different factors there. Our direct business includes social, spend as well, and we see that as a growing part of our business, particularly as we get more social networks and more coverage across the social network. So we’ve got a strong growth catalyst there. On the other hand, we’ve got a lot of room to catch up to our advertiser spend on the programmatic side. If you look at display and mobile ad spend in the U.S., anywhere from 85% to 90% of that spend is done on programmatic platforms. And currently, if you look at our revenue breakout, it’s about evenly split between direct and programmatic. So, I think we’ve got a lot of room for additional programmatic growth to start to fill in space there and catch up. So, I think programmatic is still going to have really nice growth trajectory. But as social continues to grow as well, we’re going to have a balance there. So, I think the answer is we’ve got growth on both sides of that business. Programmatic, I think, growth is going to outpace direct growth just due to the fact that there’s so much additional white space for us to catch up there. But we see a nice balance in both of those areas, mainly because our direct business is being driven by social expansion as well.

And Raimo, on your question for the rule of 60 and our perspective on investments, yes, we’re committed to the rule of 60 just because it really reflects the highly profitable business model that we have. And it’s sort of the outcome of really the highly profitable way we can grow our business. We didn’t really slow down our investments in 2020, right? We invested, we added a lot of people in the year that was disrupting the market, but where we still had growth on the top line that allowed us to continue our investments. The way we think about trade-offs is really around the opportunity to accelerate investments for either the product road map or in expanding into new markets. If we see the opportunity, we will go after the opportunity to the extent that we see a line of sight on accelerated revenue growth. So, we’re very close on the top line, making sure we can verify everywhere our customers are. And if that means we accelerate investments to get there, that’s what we will do. Our outlook in the second quarter’s guidance actually reflect that, right, with added investments and margins that dips below 30 just for the quarter. So, we will continue to take that trade-off. But ultimately, our model is very profitable, and the rule of 60 is something we’re committed to.

Our next question comes from Matt Hedberg with RBC Capital Markets.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Congrats on the results. I wanted to start with the idea of cookies. I mean, we’ve all seen the news around Google moving away from cookies. Apple is certainly making some changes with IDFA that just make it more challenging for ad tech companies around data collection. Obviously, you guys operate in a cookie-free architecture. Could you talk about though how this might impact the industry? And maybe competitively, how it benefits you guys?

Yes. Thanks for the question, Matt. Broadly speaking, what’s going on with cookies and universal IDs and tracking, et cetera, is something that from an operational perspective, we’re largely isolated -- or insulated from, right? We have a system that is based on the what, the where, the how, not the who, which gives us a lot of different ways of measuring without having to leverage those device -- those trackers. I do think that the industry has done -- the open internet has done a really nice job addressing the challenges that they face in that space and will continue to do so. So ultimately, I think it’s going to become a nonfactor down the road for free open internet. For us, we do look at this as a really nice opportunity to continue to leverage the solutions that we have as measurement changes, right, from a focus on reach and frequency and an individual level measurement to other performance-based proxies that are not based on UIDs or cookies. And that’s where I think we have a great opportunity. And we’ve launched solutions to take advantage of that. So, our contextual targeting solution, which was recently launched, leverages our capabilities and understanding context of a page to better align ad spend. Authentic Attention is another measure of user engagement that can be used as a proxy for performance and outcomes. So, I think what we’re seeing here is innovation coming from this activity as opposed to any degradation of the business. And innovation is spurring new ways of looking at performance. It’s providing opportunities for companies like DV to play a bigger role in driving that performance. So, we think that this is -- it’s not just for the most part, but in total is good for our business moving ahead.

Got it. That’s super helpful. And then, someone asked about competition earlier, kind of the two big competitors. But I wanted to kind of drill down some of the faster growing aspects of your model and that is Social and CTV. Are these deals still largely greenfield in nature? Maybe just give us a little bit more color on sort of where you guys think you are from a tech perspective for those two emerging categories, just given its relative importance, so I think your sort of your durable growth here.

Yes. So, I think for both CTV and Social, we’re relatively early days of both product development and product distribution, end market penetration, right? So, when we start off with our enterprise clients, a lot of it has to do with focus and coverage on mobile and video and display, et cetera, using our core verification products. But over time as we continue to expand and their spend continues to expand into new sectors like CTV and further into new social applications, we follow them into those markets and provide solutions, which continue to kind of grow with them. We’ve done that with CTV and social. And like I said, I think we’re relatively early days and continue to expand, not just with our current clients, but with new clients as well. And it’s important to remember, when we -- so much of our growth comes from current organic clients buying new solutions from us and upsell, which means we still have a ton of white space to introduce solutions and newer solutions to new clients as well. So, I think both of those factors weigh into the point where I think we’ve got considerable growth opportunities on both Social and CTV, both with new clients and current clients, driven by product growth and introductions and continued coverage and partnerships to verify and measure more across both of those areas.

Our next question comes from Ron Josey with JMP Securities.

I’ll echo everyone’s comments on just a great first quarter out of the gate. Mark, I wanted to talk a little bit more on just -- maybe you mentioned it earlier, the Custom Contextual and Authentic Attention, just the new products that are out there and specifically, the go-to-market strategy as basically DV is exposed to more performance ad budgets. And I think you mentioned some return rates there. So, can you just talk a little bit more about just the go-to-market strategies for both Custom Contextual and Authentic Attention? And I have one follow-up.

Yes. So great questions, Ron. Thanks for them. Custom Contextual and Authentic Attention both have a core go-to-market around first introduction to enterprise clients. Again, such a nice base for us to work from. And we’re talking about folks like Unilever and Mondelez, and all these big global clients who we work with and the hundreds of brands that gives us this amazing launching pad for new solutions. So, the overarching is, we go to the folks that know us first, right, and trust our data, because both of those products leverage data that they’re already using to do verification and measurement. So a, take that core data set, spin it off to different types of solutions so that we can engage with our clients in multiple different ways, right? So that’s Phase 1 of the go-to-market. The second, which kind of makes a more seamless opportunity for us. If you think about Custom Contextual is employed in the programmatic space. where we already have really strong distribution across so many of the leading DSPs, right? So, our enterprise clients who are already buying our core programmatic product there now have the ability to buy another solution there, our Custom Contextual products. So, a, that’s where distribution really helps out, right? So, if it starts with our core clients and our relationships there and next moves to where can they get that solution? And that means our distribution across all the major DSPs becomes not only an advantage for us, but a gating factor for other competitors. Authentic Attention, very similar. It uses our core data set and leverages that to provide a whole different level of engagement and intention metrics that help drive better optimization of media spend. And for there, the go-to-market is similar to programmatic, but with the fact that we go to our core clients first, but it’s a little bit more bespoke in the fact that it is a tool set that can be used across direct buys as well, right? So, it’s not just going to be in the programmatic world, it could be across CTV and the social buys there consequently. So, both of them leverage the fact that we have got great customer relationships. Both of them leverage that core data set to spin out and make it a unique application for each of them. But one of them is used predominantly on direct buys, and the other is a programmatic -- is a programmatic implementation.

And maybe just a quick follow-up on that, Mark. You mentioned in your prepared remarks that Authentic Attention, Mondelez saw data outperform results by 143% versus prior. Vodafone had 3.5 times higher rates on transactions, I think. So, is this a newer ad buy, a newer ad budget that maybe DV is exposed to, or just to your point, it’s a land and expand strategy with newer products? Thank you.

Yes. It’s -- I mean, look, it’s definitely a land and expand, right? So, it’s the same ad budget, but making sure that same ad budget is even more optimally spent, which is -- it’s really cool for us too because it means that we can continue to sell services across the same spend and drive our MTF, right, those transaction fees, without having those advertisers have to spend more for us to take advantage of driving more revenue for ourselves. So, it really is the true qualification of an upsell. It’s -- we don’t need their volume or them to spend in new sectors, which we can certainly take advantage of down the road as well to sell them these additional solutions. So, their budgets don’t need to increase for us to make more money.

Our next question comes from Laura Martin with Needham & Company.

So, I think you said that CTV grew 75% year-over-year in the quarter. So, could you confirm that you actually said that on the call? And then secondly, what I’m really interested in on that is, do you think that was faster than the market or slower than the CTV market? Did you hold share, or are you gaining share of CTV? What do you think?

Hey Laura, it’s Nicola. Yes. So, we’re definitely -- yes, we can confirm the number, 75% on the volume. And we -- look, it’s off of a small base. We think we are entering the market aggressively and doing very well with the customer and our distributors. So, we do think we’re growing very fast in CTV for sure.

Right. But, do you think you’re growing? We have CTV numbers -- you’re the last guys to report. I have CTV numbers ranging from 32% growth to 120% growth. I’m wondering, as an expert, how fast you guys think CTV is growing.

Again, off of a small base, I think it’s probably growing in the range that we are growing it.

Okay, great. And then, my second question was the hardest question I get from investors is, I -- they understand that you have no cookies risk. However, what percent of your total adoption runs through platforms, like DSPs, like Trade Desk that actually has a lot of cookies risk potentially. If Universal ID isn’t widely adopted by consumers, how much of your revenue is risk through that -- to those DSP channels?

It’s a great question, Laura. If you think about our business currently, about 50% of our business is programmatic and 50% direct. Of that programmatic business, we don’t have transparency on how much of it actually uses cookie to do targeting. Because remember, some of that programmatic business may be private marketplace packages, some of it may be automated guarantee packages, which don’t use a lot of identifiers or targets targeting to use. However, though, I think at the end of the day -- and some of it actually may be mobile, too. Because remember, there’s mobile, there’s lots of different areas where programmatic plays a role without cookies today. So look, we feel like, a, there’s opportunities for us to continue to grow in programmatic, based on contextual targeting starting to become more and more to the forefront for programmatic buyers, and we’re playing in that space, too, so we get a chance to kind of double dip on programmatic growth. But also, I think there’s a good opportunity for the continued use and expansion of lots of different identifiers on the programmatic platforms to compete against the walled gardens. Nonetheless, we are in both spaces. We take advantage of growth opportunities, both in walled gardens and the open internet. So, I think, we’re in a good position either way of things go.

Our next question comes from Arjun Bhatia with William Blair.

Thank you for taking my questions. And I’ll echo my congrats on a great quarter. I think, I heard in the prepared remarks that Authentic Brand Safety was at 50% of your programmatic revenue, which is, I think, quite impressive given how new that solution is. Can you maybe just talk a little bit about how we should expect penetration of Authentic Brand Safety to continue? And then more quality, how do you think of Authentic Brand Safety as a competitive differentiator when you look across the landscape, meaning are customers actually coming to you and saying, hey, I want to adopt DoubleVerify because of Authentic Brand Safety capabilities that you have maybe that are difficult to find elsewhere in the market?

Yes. Thanks, Arjun. It’s a great take. And I’ll start with the second half of that question first because it’s the easiest one to answer, which is nobody has a comparable solution. And I think that’s why we’ve seen such stellar growth of that product, which is, again, a customized programmatic application of verification data that there’s just nothing comparable out there. So, we’ve seen the rapid acceleration of that product, which is also a premium price product for us as well. So, not only does it contribute to we call our MTM growth, so volume growth, but it also continues to support our fee growth because it is a premium-priced product. So, we’ve got a really nice advantage in the marketplace there, and it’s spurred a significant amount of growth. I think as far as longer term trajectory of that product, Nicola, do you want to talk a little bit about that.

Yes. Arjun, the way we think about it, first of all, I’m going to reiterate a little bit of what Mark said, which is the what Authentic Brand Safety did for us is it was a proof point for a premium price product and how well it was going to be taken up by the programmatic advertiser -- the advertisers that buy for programmatic. So, it was a proof point that premium price products do work. In terms of how much, where it will end up, what I will say is it just launched on Google DV360 platform, that was a Q4 -- late Q4 2020 launch. So, there’s still opportunity there for people to understand the product and buy it on that platform specifically, plus the overall general growth in programmatic. I could see new customers taking Authentic Brand Safety just because it’s such a powerful product. I would say thinking ahead, Going back to my first point, because premium price products have worked for us, especially on Authentic Brand Safety, I think the next layer of products, including Custom Contextual, will have a similar pattern for us. It’s premium price. It will be on top of everything else and will drive our growth as well.

Wonderful. That’s great to hear and very helpful. And then, just another one, if I can. Mark, I think you mentioned some great new customer wins from 2020, including, I think I heard Unilever and Fujifilm. Can you just maybe help us understand how much of these new customers you’re getting from competitors that maybe used a verification solution in the past versus greenfield opportunities in the market from customers that are maybe just starting to realize the importance of verification and measurement in the digital advertising ecosystem?

Yes. It’s a great question. I think we’ve got a nice balance of both. And so, there are definitely some new wins there of folks that, mostly, were using point solutions or relying on kind of baked-in solutions into platforms, but really decided based on increased brand safety concerns and the prevalence of fraud that they’re continuing to see in certain sectors that it was important for them to kind of look at a more cohesive, complete solution. So, we’ve seen a nice balance of both. And even in the cases where we’re winning competitive --against our competitors, what’s been nice is we’re not only kind of winning the competitor business, but we’re expanding on that business as well. So, I would say, in most, if not all cases, where we’re winning a competitor’s business, it’s not just for the current business they have. It’s for some additional pieces of coverage. So, they also want coverage in social or they’re looking for additional extension into CTV or they want additional programmatic coverage. And I think that’s really important to note, because the completeness of our solution also helps us win deals. So, the fact that we’ve got more MRC accreditations across social or across any other -- all the other media means that when someone is looking to do a competitive RFP, it’s not just who has the best solution, i.e., like who delivers best results, which we win against, but it’s also the fact that, hey, we’re looking to expand into these new areas, which platform is going to give us coverage there. And that’s a great aspect of the power of the breadth of our platform, right? We’re winning because it’s a better platform. But also in these head-to-head deals when those advertisers in a majority of the cases, they’re saying, hey, we are doing this today. We want to expand to this. So, the RFP is going to include these new areas. We cover those better than anybody else. So, that’s helped things along as well.

Our next question comes from Justin Patterson with KeyBanc.

Great. Thank you very much for taking the questions. And congratulations. Mark, you mentioned audio and gaming in your prepared remarks. Could you talk about the investment need to succeed in new channels and how we should think about the time line between investment and monetization? And then, I’ll pause there, and I have a follow-up for Nicola after that.

Yes. Hey. Thanks, Justin, for the question. So, we’re really excited about where we think we can take our core platform as different emerging media start to catch the attention of our advertisers. And I think audio and gaming are two of the most that we hear from those advertisers. And as we’ve noted before, we really use our customers as the leads for where we go next, right? They’re the ones who are driving us based on their spend and based on what they say is important to them down the road. So, we use their cues. We don’t want to get too far ahead of them, right, because we want to make sure that we’re aligned with where their dollars are going. But we do get into those markets before they do. In the case of kind of audio and gaming, we’re just starting to lean into those investments today. We know that the first stage of what we do is to leverage what we currently have in our core verification and measurement solutions and extend them to the new media, then it comes down to what are the unique aspects of that media that we need to build either adjacent products for or different levels of functionality. And that obviously takes longer than just taking the core and extending it. So, we’re in early days in both of those areas. I would say, this is a 2022 opportunity for us to really start to think about monetization of those areas. But, product cycle is usually around 12 months or so. So, I think check back in next year, and we’ll have a really solid update on both of those areas.

Very helpful. Thank you. Nicola, Q1 was a somewhat unusual quarter where brands set out to a late start. COVID-affected advertisers also came back at various points of time. So, I’m curious if you could talk about linearity, whether there were any factors that actually tempered the Q1 growth rate prevented from being even stronger? And then, how we should think about that Q2 guide in the context of modest acceleration, but you’re also facing a 20-point easier comparison? Thank you.

Yes. So , you’re right. I think in Q1, we are not -- not all of our customers are spending back at the pre-COVID levels, right? That’s clear. And I think the start of the year was slower for some, tried to understand exactly how the year was going to play out. And that obviously impacted Q1 even though it was a strong quarter at 32% growth rate. What we’re hearing from our customers is more favorable outlook, feeling stronger about certainly the second half of the year and the fourth quarter, which is seasonally strong. In terms of our second quarter guidance, we had a strong quarter last year, right, 22% growth, while many of our peers didn’t show growth at all. So, as compared to the 22 last year, 38% at the midpoint, is a continuation of the recovery that we’re seeing and a large enterprise wins of Q1 starting to scale. So, it fits the story of slow start. We intend to show consistent growth, right? We have a transactional software model. It’s highly repeatable. We have a 95% gross retention rate. So, we wouldn’t expect huge spikes on the growth rates. And that’s kind of where you’re seeing. The reason why Q2 is where it’s at because last year’s Q2 was more muted than the other quarters.

Thanks. Our next question comes from Michael Graham with Canaccord.

I just wanted to maybe quantify a little bit some of the questions around the product opportunity. And looking back to 2019 and 2020, you had really good expansion in your MTF because of some of the new products around brand safety. And maybe some of that was paused a little bit during COVID. So, can you just maybe mention your outlook in terms of the puts and takes around MTF expansion? I mean, we’re sort of modeling it flat, but it sounds like there’s a good case for that to expand. And maybe could you just help us understand some of the products that you have that you’re working on like up into contention that maybe we haven’t seen yet. Can you just, at a high level help us understand sort of how impactful some of that stuff could be? Do you have stuff in the pipeline that could be as important as the brand product, for example?

Yes. Michael, it’s Nicola. So, I’m going to start by saying, the main driver of our growth is MTMs, right? The more volume we can verify, that’s the main driver for that growth. On the MTF side of the equation, I think the bands around movements in MTF is twofold. You mentioned the one around premium priced products, increasing MTF. There’s against that -- as we expand internationally, which contributes a lot to MTM, the MTF there might be a little discounted to the U.S. MTF. So, that creates the band around where MTF is going to be. Our expectation is that MTF is going to remain fairly steady because of those two factors. In terms of what you’re discussing in terms of new products, we do see those new products as being premium priced, in which case, those would actually contribute to a growth in MTF. But our general outlook is, we’re very focused on MTM, and we think that the two factors that I mentioned around MTF will keep it fairly stable for us.

Our next question comes from Youssef Squali with Truist Securities.

Great. Thank you very much. And congrats guys on your inaugural conference call as a public company. So I guess just a follow-up on a couple of other questions that were asked around just growth. I was wondering either Mark or Nicola, if you guys can speak to growth from existing versus new customers? And just stepping back a little bit, you’ve had some changes or you’ve added more bandwidth to your management team, et cetera. Can you maybe speak to the sales efficiency that you’re see in sales cycle, particularly on the enterprise side, and just kind of gating factors that are preventing that business from growing even faster, just considering the huge TAM in front of you? Thanks.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Youssef. I think, when we look at traditionally how the business has grown, a lot of that has come organically from current clients. And we always know that that’s the easiest place for us to drive growth, both based on their continued spend and transition of their spend from traditional media into digital, as well as our ability to continue to expand coverage and upsell them new products, right? So, we still can see -- I think we’ll continue to see a majority of our growth coming from same-store sales by their volume growth, continue to upsell new solutions to them and our expanded coverage. However, we are seeing really nice broader uptake outside of our core client set for solutions with new partners. And I think a lot of that has to do with our fact that, as you noted, in the second part of your question, we start to lean in more heavily into investing in sales forces around the world as well as additional new sales leadership and a restructuring of our sales organization. I think that will play a significant role over the coming quarters and our ability to continue to expand into that white space that there is globally, right? And if there’s -- we don’t see a lot of gating factors with our ability to do that other than literally our ability to hire great salespeople in local markets. What we’ve done and what our success has been to date is closing enterprise clients that give us a launching pad to roll into new global markets. We did that with Yahoo! Japan, which opened up the Japanese market for us, closing folks like Mondelez, which is one of the largest advertisers in India, opened India for us. And we’re going to continue to see that. As we close those new enterprise clients, they help us open up new markets, and those new markets then give us a launching pad to close new local clients in those markets. So, we’re going to continue to see great organic growth from our core customer base. But I think you’ll see, as we lean into getting more enterprise clients, those enterprise clients help us open up new markets, those new markets give us an opportunity to sell new customers. You’re going to see an increased focus and success rate outside of our core business and growth coming from that area, too.

Our next question comes from Alan Gould with Loop Capital.

Thanks for taking the question. And likewise, congratulations on the first quarter out of the box. Two questions. On Custom Contextual, was this your first quarter that you generated revenue from it? And how big is the opportunity for Custom Contextual? Could it be as big or bigger than ABS? And then, the second question is more mundane. OctoBot, were you guys the only ones that were able to uncover and find that fraud?

Yes. I’ll take the second half. First of all, thanks for the question. I’ll take the second half of that first. OctoBot, we were the first company to detect that level of fraud. I think there are some subsequent other companies out there that may have covered pieces of it. But a, we uncovered the first aspects of the fraud, and we also string them all together, to determine that it was all part of the same family. And it was -- it’s something that occurred over 18 months. So, it really is -- it’s such a incredibly interesting space. I mean, this is -- a lot of the fraud detection is technology and automation, but there’s also an investigative and human element to this that over time, having a really strong data science team to string these all together to determine they all came from the same -- of the same family or different types of fraud, it was really unique. And it’s unique to the way we operate. And it’s a testament to our broad view of all different media, right? Because even though this is a CTV fraud implementation, our experience in finding fraud across traditional video and mobile and display played a role in this because it was all very similar in the way that it was approached. So a, I think, again, this is another example of where our scale and breadth of solution really contribute to our ability to provide a safe and secure ecosystem for our partners into play. Leading into the first question, I’ll let Nicola kind of get on that.

Yes. Hey, Alan, it’s Nicola. On the Custom Contextual, it is early days. So, the contribution of the product in the first quarter numbers is small. The opportunity for the product, we actually see it as large. We do see it as part of this idea of being able to provide premium products on top of the basic suite of products. It also comes at the right time with all the discussions that we’ve had around cookie duplications, et cetera. It’s a perfect product for the time, but it is early days. We’re hopeful on the product. We think there’s a huge opportunity there, but it’s really too early to tell.

Thank you. There are no further questions today. I’ll turn it back to Mark Zagorski for closing remarks. Thank you.

All right. Thank you all for joining us on the very long call today. We appreciate your time. It’s been an exciting few months at DoubleVerify. We appreciate all the support of our investors, clients, partners and Board have provided. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the global DoubleVerify team who has done such an incredible job over the past decade getting us to this point. The team has been the driving force behind our success to date and our continued success in the future. Again, we appreciate the opportunity to discuss first quarter results with you and look forward to talking with many of you over the coming weeks.

Thank you. This concludes today’s call. All parties may disconnect. Have a good evening.