Greetings. Welcome to DoubleVerify’s First Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Tejal Engman, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Good afternoon, and welcome to DoubleVerify’s first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. With us today are Mark Zagorski, CEO; and Nicola Allais, CFO. Today’s press release and this call may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties and changes and reflect our current expectations and information currently available to us and our actual results could differ materially. For more information, please refer to the risk factors in our recent SEC filings, including our Form 10-Q and our annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, our discussion today will include references to certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures and should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in today’s earnings press release, which is available on our Investor Relations website at ir.doubleverify.com. Also during the call today, we’ll be referring to the slide deck posted on our website. With that, I’ll turn it over to Mark.

Thanks, Tejal, and thank you all for joining us today. I’m excited to discuss our strong first quarter performance and optimistic outlook for the rest of the year. We started 2023 laser focused on a few key areas. First, on launching innovative, outcome driving products anchored in our deep expertise and legacy investments in machine learning and data science. Second, scaling our independently accredited core verification solutions across leading social and CTV platforms. And finally, expanding our partnerships with large advertisers and preeminent digital ad platforms around the globe. On all three fronts, we can confidently state that we are executing ahead of our expectations. In the face of a challenging macro environment, our performance remains resilient due to the efficacy and utility of our solutions and the deep trust we have built with all of our stakeholders as an unbiased, independent analytics engine committed to making the digital advertising ecosystem stronger, safer and more secure. This steadfast vision continues to be DV’s Northstar, core to the value we deliver and proven to generate exceptional ROI for our customers and partners. Our first quarter results exemplify the impact of this commitment when it is embraced and empowered by a passionate group of DV team members in 21 locations around the world. We grew first quarter revenue by 27% year-over-year to $123 million, exceeding the top end of our guidance and significantly outpacing the growth rates of both the digital ad industry and our competitors. We saw strong, sustained and broad-based demand for DV solutions with each of our three business lines delivering double-digit growth. Advertiser demand for both our premium-priced authentic brand suitability programmatic solution and our social measurement solutions continue to grow, resulting in strong business expansion with existing customers and new customer wins. We won numerous RFPs in…

Thanks, Mark, and good afternoon, everyone. We’re pleased to have delivered strong revenue growth and profitability in the first quarter. The outperformance relative to our expectations was primarily driven by stronger-than-expected measurement growth, which gives us the confidence to raise our full year 2023 revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance. Total revenue grew 27% in the Q1 2023 to $123 million primarily driven by Advertiser revenue growth of 28%, which continues to be volume led. In the first quarter, MTMs were up 25% year-over-year, while MTFs grew 3% year-over-year. Activation revenue continues to be driven by our premium ABS programmatic solution, which is now in its fifth year since Launch. ABS delivered 56% revenue growth and comprised 56% of activation revenue compared to 48% in the prior year period. As Mark mentioned, ABS volumes were up 55% and the ABS fixed fee was 1% higher as we rolled out bifurcated ABS pricing for display and video impressions following the implementation of a similar price bifurcation for a standard programmatic products in the first quarter of last year. The ABS price bifurcation was assumed in our original full year 2023 guidance, and most of ABS’ first quarter growth came from volume expansion by existing customers who continue to deploy this industry-leading solution across additional markets. Turning to measurement, revenue grew 22% driven by existing customer expansion on social and by the ramp of new enterprise customers that we signed last year. Social measurement growth was led by Meta and by TikTok, which almost achieved its full year 2022 revenue contribution in the first quarter alone. International growth of 26% in the first quarter outpaced overall measurement growth and now represents 26% of total measurement revenue. Supply side revenue grew 15%, driven in particular by continued platform revenue growth from Amazon and LinkedIn.…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Michael Graham with Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed.

Hey, congrats on the strong numbers. I just wanted to focus on the international measurement growth for a minute because the last couple of quarters that growth rate had really slowdown and you accelerated to 26% growth this quarter against a tough comp in Q1 of last year of 40% growth. So yes, really just wanted to hear a little bit more about how you’re achieving that sort of growth rebounds internationally.

Thanks, Michael for the question. And yes, we’re really pleased with the progress that we’ve made in the markets outside the U.S. EMEA grew like 23% year-over-year for the quarter, APAC at 31%. And I think a lot of that had to do with something we’ve been talking about for the last few quarter, which was our continued investment in commercial resources outside of the U.S. And then a commercial reorg, which we started at the beginning of last year, which really started to close up at the end of the year. Those two things gave us a lot of confidence in the fact that we had the right people in the right places outside the U.S. and they had the right mission in front of them. Because of that, we saw a really strong pipeline coming out of Q4, which we mentioned earlier this year on our first call. That pipeline really came to fruition in Q1. So it was a lot of hard work by our teams. It was a lot of investment in people and in planning, and ultimately it turned into just better sales, better pipeline, and that pipeline came to bear in Q1 of this year.

Okay, thanks for the color Mark.

Our next question is from Arjun Bhatia with William Blair. Please proceed.

Hi, guys. Thanks and congrats on the strong quarter here. I noticed you were optimistic, you raised your full year guide, obviously when you called out, I think optimism on the measurement side of the business. One, can you just talk about what makes you confident in raising guidance for the year and what are you seeing in measurements specifically that’s giving you – that’s making you optimistic on the rest of the year here?

Thanks for the question, Arjun. We’ve always said the kind of measurement and the core measurement business was the backbone of the workforce of the business, and a lot of our success there is related to what I mentioned to the question from Michael was, investment in sales resources and sales planning and reorganization of that sales team. Those are the guys that go out and close the deals and measurement, as we said, is kind of core to spinning that flywheel like they say of upselling into programmatic, upselling into performance solutions. So when that base hits, it’s great news for us for the year. I wouldn’t totally equate it to a SaaS business, where they get a big chunk of their meet upfront and they know what the year’s going to look like. But we know measurement customers when they buy in, they buy in and stick and that sticks with their spend throughout the year. So I think we’ve got confidence in the fact that those customers that have come in are measurement customers. Those dollars are not as fluid as activation dollars, which tend to move with programmatic spend. So that gives us a good amount of confidence that, yes, we’re in the right place, what we need to be to raise the guide for the year and we’ve got a good basis from which to do so.

Perfect. Thanks, Mark. That’s very helpful. And then I wanted to touch on attention. It seems like that product is starting to get some good traction here. Are we crossing the chasm with that solution? And maybe just would love to hear how you think the pre-bid capabilities that you launched with universal attention might help advance some of the adoption of this attention solution here.

Yes, I think it’s a great question and we do talk a lot about attention. I think – I don’t know if we call it a chasm, but let’s call it a mountain climb. And we’ve started making our way up that mountain and I think we’re getting some good traction. We saw two times the volumes of tests year-over-year, two times the volume of revenue in Q1 year-over-year. Three times the volume of campaign blueprints and attention. So it’s – we’re getting there, right? The scale’s getting there. I think a big part of it, and I think we also mentioned this in our last call was – we love the value prop of having pre-bid and post-bid work together. We’ve seen the power of that with our core verification solutions. We’ve seen the power of that with ABS working with measurement. And I think the ability for us to kind of grow the attention category as a whole, I think will also benefit from having pre-bid and post-bid working together. So I think we always say, it’s still early days, even though it’s been a long period of early days, but as the industry catches up with standardization, and those things get locked in. And even as competition gets greater, I think, competition is okay in this space, because it actually kind of justifies and the idea that attention matters and attention matters to advertisers. We’re going to see more traction there. So we love the introduced of a pre-bid solution. We think that’s going to help kind of drive that optimization cycle. And this is just the beginning for pre-bid on attention. We think there’s an evolution of that to an even more powerful solution on the pre-bid side, the same way we evolved standard brand safety and brand suitability into authentic brand suitability, which is arguably now still one of our most powerful products. I think we’ve got a long way to go. But we’re taking those steps one by one and the introduction of really the first scaled optimization pre-bid attention segment out there is a great step towards that.

Thank you, Mark, and congrats again on the quarter, guys.

Thank you.

Our next question is from Justin Patterson with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please Proceed.

Great. Thank you. Two questions, I’ll do the first and then follow-up after. I just wanted to touch on ABS. It’s been your biggest solution, five years in launch and now still growing 56%. And I think most of that was driven by volume this quarter. Could you just talk about how you see that volume expansion potential from existing customers going forward? And then from there I’d go for my follow-up after.

Yes. Look, ABS continues to be a real powerhouse for us. As you noted, a majority of the growth that we had from ABS that the revenue growth came from existing customers this quarter, 94 of our top 100 customers are using ABS right now in Q1. So what that shows to me is that even with pretty significant penetration, our top 100 customers to be able to grow at a 56% year-over-year growth rate means ABS works. Clients are using it in more markets, they’re using it cost more brands and it’s still got legs. So we continue to lead with our programmatic solutions in many pitches. We continue to have opportunities below the top 100 clients to continue to grow. And we think ABS is going to continue to drive growth for us even after, as we noted a price bifurcation in which we raised the price on video, we saw very little friction from that price increase. So it not only shows the utility of the product, but the value that we’re creating for advertisers to show that growth.

Great. Thanks. And then for the second question, I wanted to touch on social measurement a bit more, Meta and TikTok almost achieving their 2022 revenue contribution in just the first quarters very impressive. Would love to hear more about just how you’re thinking about social progressing in the year? And whether that could actually burn into a channel that brings net new advertisers into the broader DV ecosystem? Thank you.

Yes. Justin, I’ll take this one. So just to clarify, it is TikTok revenue that achieved all of 2022 revenue in Q1 2023. Meta is a much larger base and we’ve had products with Meta for a much longer period of time. But your points around social are the right ones. We were very pleased with how strong the uptake is on the TikTok product. It is now already our third largest social platform. It remains small if you compare it to Meta and YouTube, but it is an indicator that our products are really resonating in the social channel. Social is about 38% of our Measurement business in the quarter, and it was up from where it was last year. So we feel very strongly that we will continue to see traction on the social wall gardens as we continue to put more products out there and go into new markets.

And I’ll throw one other point there too, Justin, which is you mentioned, does it have the ability to attract new customers? In Q1 it certainly did, because 40% of our revenue growth was from new customers in the quarter and social measurement growth that is was from new customers. And it was folks like Mars, Paramount, Bumble, Buyer Store, Conagra big brands were activating across social. TikTok is certainly helping on that front because people are moving there. So again, social is a place that we’re going to feel very comfortable, continue to focus on growth there and we’ll continue to invest as well.

Thank you both.

Our next question is from Andrew Boone with JMP Securities. Please proceed.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Mark, you took the EBITDA guide up 1 point and earlier you mentioned the investments that you made last year in international. I guess my question is, are you now to scale with resources that you can let more upside flow through to EBITDA and profitability? And then for my second, you guys mentioned 45% of the top 700 clients are using less than half of the key products in 2022. Can you just talk about that upsell cycle? What’s left that you guys really want to push as you think about 2023 and 2024? What do you think is the low hanging fruit from here on the upsell? Thanks so much.

Sure. I’ll take the second half of that question and let Nicola take the first half. Anything that says EBITDA, I put the CFO, he’s much better with those numbers. But when we look at the upsell cycle, you’re right, we’ve got still a pretty decent amount of product upsells to make across the board. We talk about ABS, although ABS is some pretty high penetration in our top 100 clients, we’ve still got a lot of room in our next several hundred to go after. And that’s always going to be our first go-to when we look at the upsell cycle is move anybody who’s using standard brand safety or brand suitability to ABS, right? So, I think that’s a big one. The second one is when we look at social. Social measurement continues to be a great growth engine for us. But we look at social as a separate category. So just because you’re doing measurement for us in the over the web or even you see programmatic and over the web, doesn’t mean you’re a client that’s using us for measurement on social. So when we think of like the first two things we’re going to walk into a customer to do and we’re going to upsell, it’s going to be ABS and in social. And I think we’ve got room on both of those products as we look at the potential upsell, plus, we know that they’re both great margin drivers for us, great growth drivers for us, particularly in opportunities outside the U.S.

Yes, in terms of EBITDA margins and expectations and how we think about it for the future of the business, we did have a strong first quarter around profitability. I think the numbers that make us feel very strongly that we have a business that can scale is really where the investments were. So we were able to essentially have virtually year-on-year flat on sales and marketing and G&A. And we’ve spoken about the fact that we’ve already invested in SG&A in prior years. And in a quarter where, for example, you see 26% growth in international. It’s not as though we have to invest additional resources to achieve that growth. So there is inherent scale coming from those two lines as we become a larger company. However, we are continuing to choose to invest in R&D. That is the one area where you will see growth in investments year-on-year. And that is specifically around data scientists to allow us to go deeper into AI and machine learning investments. These are not brand-new investments. We’ve been doing it for many years already, but the opportunity there to continue to invest is available to us, and we’re going to do it because it’s going to accelerate our product road map. So it’s a long way to say we are choosing to continue to invest. Our EBITDA margin is still very healthy, but we are already seeing the benefits of the scaling of our business in sales and marketing and G&A.

Thank you.

Sure.

Our next question is from Mark Murphy with JPMorgan. Please proceed.

Thank you so much, I’ll add my congrats. Mark, I wanted to ask you, the win rates remain very high. Can you refresh us on the role of accreditations through that lens, just to help you win business. And how wide is the gap today in the accreditations between DoubleVerify and if we compare that to the number two and number three competitors? And then I have a quick follow-up.

Yes. I think, look, accreditations are definitely part of the matrix of elements that go into decision process for an advertiser. It’s an important one, as is customer service and customer support, as is pricing, but probably still the most important one is the performance of the platform. And that’s where we continue to lean in. That’s why technology expense is such an important one for us to keep investing in. Because when those platforms go head to head, we’ve said this time and again, whichever platform delivers the highest ROI by filtering out the most fraud, by creating the greatest level of brand, granularity – brand suitability granularity is the one that’s going to win. And I think that’s driving a great win ratio for us. But when it does come to accreditations, I mean, we look at the number across the multiple different organizations that are out there. Our best estimate is, we’re anywhere from 50% or more different accreditations to almost double depending on it. It’s hard to find that there’s lots of different places where people have accreditations in different countries. But we certainly outpace our competitors by a significant amount in that space.

Okay. And then as a quick follow-up, what are you discovering in terms of viewability in the CTV realm? What I mean is, are there fewer issues because in some cases, you have much larger screens or are you finding that there are more issues because you can – you can encounter buffering or ad placement problems or some of the ad skipping capabilities of those platforms?

Yes, it’s a great question. I mean there’s always been this assumption that CTV is 100% viable, right? It’s in someone’s leaving room, how could it not be viewed very different problems than a banner ad on a web page where someone can provide it or an impression on a mobile phone that gets pushed by very quickly or shut off. But there are still significant issues around viewability and the things that we’re tracking are exactly the things mark that you know, which is does the ad one for the full first quartile, right? Does it didn’t run for that period of time that I can actually registered as viewable doesn’t add most importantly, is it running while the TV is on, which is believe it or not, becoming an increasingly significant issue for advertisers, because many apps are not passing the signal that says this television is on. They’re actually running ads while the TV is off, either statedly because they should be doing that or on purpose because they’re not legitimate apps. So viewability, the way that we measure the viewability, it’s a bit different than what you think of in a traditional web world. But those issues are continuing to be real issues for advertisers, which is ads not running the full extent they should and ads running when a television screening is actually off. The box on, the consistent working, the computer is working that’s running that streaming application, but the screen is not on. So those are issues that continue to be challenging to advertisers. And I think they’re just starting to wake up to the fact that this is a real – this is really something that we start measuring and paying attention to.

Thank you very much.

Our next question is from Eric Sheridan with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Thanks so much for taking the questions. Maybe two, if I could. In terms of the stat you gave on increase in number of large advertisers and bringing that back to potentially new logos, are there any industry verticals and or geos you’re calling out when you look at your backlog for new large advertisers or new logos that you think we should be monitoring for potential for outsize growth or areas where the backlog is showing you a lot of promise in terms of building not only for 2023 but beyond? And then the second question would be on Netflix as a platform. How much of scaling the Netflix business now as we move through 2023 and out into the out year, is about elements where you need to invest to sort of position you to benefit from what they build over the long-term versus just them executing on simply scale of ad supported customers and subscribers over time. And that’s where the revenue unlock is. Thanks so much.

For sure. So your first question, the nice thing about our business, which we mentioned in the past is that we’ve got a pretty broad based set of advertisers. So if you remember several quarters ago, there was a – there were supply chain issues around, auto delivery and some electronics delivery. So looking at a lot of folks who were focused on those two segments had some challenges running ads because there just was no reason to advertise if you couldn’t sell the product to get the product in store. We didn’t see that because we’re really nicely distributed across all the major ad segments. So there’s not one in which we could say, we’ve seen either oversized increase or decrease over the last several quarters. We’ve seen growth across all of them, which has been pretty nice. With regard to Netflix, it was only launched a few months ago in March. And so, still relatively early, but we’re seeing some pretty decent volumes starting to come across that, and it is having an impact on our CTV volume. We’ve got customers like Molson Coors, [indiscernible] Toyota that are starting to buy across and use verification across Netflix. So there’s definitely interest, there’s definitely dollars starting to flow there. And although it’s pretty early for Netflix and it’s pretty small. We’re going to be there with them for the ride, which is great. And I think it’s a nice place for us to be. We’re in 12 markets with them that’ll continue to grow and we’ll continue to grow it.

Our next question is from Laura Martin with Needham & Company. Please proceed.

Hey there, Mark. Great results. My first one is on this 80% new business when you continue to get. My question is when you go to pitch and then they try you versus your competitor, do you bundle your products so that that hit rate goes up over time? Or when you do the RFP, does it always start with a single product? So you aren’t really benefiting from bundling in these fabulous products or invest and are creating later [ph]?

It’s a great question, Laura. I wish we could bundle everything in on day one and just sell them a big package. But the short answer is it definitely varies. There are clients that are looking for single solutions and we’re displacing, for example, most on a viewability deal or I guess on a brand safety deal. And then we grow from there. So it definitely is a bit all over the board. But it still lends us to that whole kind of land and expand, right? We want to get in – get a foot in there, so that we can push other solutions across. And when we say 80% win ratio, that could be against a single product or it could be across a bundle or enterprise deal. So, it is definitely a mix of different types of wins. But in either case, we’re looking to sell them all products across our entire six categories of solutions. And I would say, in a vast majority of them, we’re not going in with all six of those categories covered. It’s some very small portion of that.

Super helpful. My second one is, the thing I liked best is that you’re carrying the video product for ABS. So my question on pricing strategy is, what is the business model for attention? Is it a percent of media or is it just an add-on to flat fee impressions?

Yes, it’s a great question. Right now, attention is set up as a CPM-based product. So it’s very much like measurement. It’s a measurement solution sold incremental to our verification. So think of it as an add-on to verification. That’s at a relatively decent premium, two to four measurements. So it’s a premium priced add-on to our measurement solution today. Doesn’t mean that model may not change in the future. And especially as we start expanding attention into CTV in other places we’ll certainly look at different models that may drive a different type of profile for the solution.

Fantastic. Thanks very much.

Our next question is from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays. Please proceed.

Hi, this is Frank on from Raimo. Congrats on another strong quarter today. I want to stay in those new logo wins. Is the buying decision still more driven by the ROI pitch or have newer products than media begun to move the needle on those RFPs?

Great question. I mean, I think ROI is what gets us in the door, right? And the newer performance-based solutions are kind of at this stage, still the icing on the cake, right? I can tell you they do sometimes open that door for us. So when we launched, for example, our measurement solutions with Scope 3, there is a huge amount of interest in looking at the viral impact of ad transactions. That created a dialogue, which, of course we came in and exploited to kind of sell additional solutions across the board, but for the most part, folks are usually looking for core solutions. We look to drive new implementations across those core solutions and supplement them with our performance solutions afterwards. It definitely varies across the board, and if that basket of goods gets bigger it provides more opportunities to have conversations with our customers. And each of them has different needs, and that’s why having a broad basis of goods and broad coverage across multiple different types of platforms is so critically important to us because we just want to have a big net to capture lots of different types of opportunities.

Very helpful. Thanks Mark.

Got it.

Our next question is from Yun Kim with Loop Capital Markets. Please proceed.

Alright. Thank you. Congrats on a solid quarter, Mark. And just following-up on a question about the expansion with existing customers. So if you can talk about the current trends that you’re seeing for the overall expansion rate for the existing customers? Has that been steady? Or has that shown improvement in recent quarters? And also just kind of curious if you can compare that expansion rate with existing customers, is that more product driven? Or is that more driven by customers simply increasing their volume and adding more channels?

Let Nicola talk here and then I’ll take it.

Sure. I’ll say the two – I’ll say the one thing that we’ve seen that’s consistent year-on-year is that the – this sort of getting in with the customer and then expanding has continued. What we – what is really at the bottom – at the core, what’s driving the expansion is obviously product upsell, but I don’t want to forget geographic expansion. So we might start with a client in one region and then expand with volume in additional [indiscernible]. And while the growth in international that we experienced in this quarter was partly on new wins, there is also an aspect of it which is just geographic expense for existing customers. So the profile of what we’re seeing in terms of the expansion is mix. It’s really new products, new geographies, and obviously as new sectors become available such as TikTok then we’re able to expand as well. One measure to maybe kind of anchor the answer is the Top 200 customers. On the Top 200 customers, that number, I’m sorry, on the customers that spent over $200,000 in the last 12 months, that number grew 29% in Q4, and it grew 31% in Q1 2023. So you see that the power of the expansion on the dollars that we’re getting from those customers.

Great. And then Nicola, I have a follow-up. On the gross margin, was there a new higher revenue sharing arrangement that drove that big sequential uptick? Or, and then also just the overall increase in cloud cost, is that primarily driven by new products that require more cloud resources? Is international mix having any impact on the gross margin? Thanks.

Yes. So what is driving the change in gross margin is a higher revenue share for the activation revenue, but it’s not because the actual agreements are changed. It’s just that the revenue is getting bigger. So it’s a higher revenue share just because of revenue is higher. And so it’s impacting gross margin from that perspective. In addition to those costs, as we said in our prepared remarks, we are choosing to invest in additional cloud computing resources, which are costs that are impacting the gross margin. This is a decision that we’re making this year, because we are expecting to see returns in terms of us being able to fuel more growth. So it is a business decision to invest into that line in addition to the fact that activation is not a larger share of our revenue.

Awesome. Thank you so much.

Our next question is from Mark Kelley with Stifel. Please proceed.

Hi guys. Thank you very much. I wanted to go back to Attention really quickly. Just, I want to get your thoughts given that there’s a bunch of different methodologies that are being worked on things like eye-tracking and the method that you guys use. Does that kind of extend the time line for some sort of standardization across the industry? That’s the first one. And then the second one is just on this new product that you mentioned. Can you dive into that just a little bit more? I guess, what are the moving pieces? And how much of the current tech that you have, can you reuse there? Thank you.

It’s a great question. So first, let me address the question on the different types of ways that folks are trying to build attention metrics. I think the reality is methodology should not drive standardization. Standards are – standard attention and engagement should be seen as relatively finite metrics that can be consistent, no matter of how someone determines what attention is, i.e., when someone is measuring reach and frequency, it’s 18- to 34-year-old male is the metric, right? How you found that out is not determinant of what happens at the end. So I think the different methodologies should slow down the standardization of the standard metrics that people agree to determine how we’re going to measure attention. So I think – it they can sometimes be full and accelerating discussion. But at the end of the day, I think the industry is going to settle on a definition that makes sense no matter what the methodology is. We believe that census and impression-level methodology is the most valid, is the most robust. As we saw in the linear TV measurement world or any other world that uses panels or very small samples, there has to be extrapolated in the wrong way to be just interpreted in many times misapply – so ultimately, we do feel that the most robust way of measuring attention has to do with census level and impression by impression measurement. It doesn’t mean it can be supplemented by other types of panel-based methodology. But ultimately, we think that’s the one that’s going to have the highest level of effectiveness and efficiency around there. When it comes to what we mentioned regarding our new prebid product. This is the first step, and it’s the first baby step into taking attention metrics and launching them into the activation sphere. We know how successful taking a measurement metric like brand suitability or brand safety can be when put into activation. So the ability to filter and optimize and then measure afterwards. So it’s a first step there, just like our first steps where we standard brand safety and they evolved into Authentic brand suitability, which is a much more fluid, much more dynamic application in the programmatic world. We think this is kind of the first step in which will evolve into a much more fluid, much more dynamic application down the road on the prebid side.

Great. Thank you, Mark.

Got it.

And our final question is from Youssef Squali with Truist Securities. Please proceed.

Great. Thank you very much and congrats on a solid quarter. So one quick question for Mark and one for Nicola. So Mark, it was interesting in the press release, you mentioned the market share gains across your three business lines. I was just wondering if you could just please remind us of the two or three products you feel or product that you feel you have the most kind of competitive advantage with the sustainability of that edge? And then Nicola, sorry if you mentioned this in your prepared remarks, but can you just remind us what’s baked into your guidance in terms of gross margin for Q2 and 2023? Thank you.

Great. So we’ll talk a little bit about, I think, where we really excel in our product and our innovation. I think the first is something again, we continue to talk about, which is ABS. There are indicators. There are other solutions out there that try to do the same thing, but no single product out there, we think is comparable to ABS. And I think it shows with the continued legs and growth it has even after the numerous years it’s been in market, to be able to grow at 56% year-over-year in Q1 is pretty exceptional. So I think ABS is an advantage. It helps us grow market share. It helps us win deals. And obviously, it helps drive revenue for the business as well. I think outside of that, it’s our unique basket of goods around the edges. I call them around the edges, but they’re not lesser products. So our advantage and attention, I can tell you, just helped us win a major advertiser deal, not because it was going to be a huge part of what they did, but they love what we did around Attention and said this is a differentiator between you guys and others. We’ll take your core solutions, but we’re going to lean into Attention down the road. And I think our continued ability to innovate around things like Attention, around areas like CTV and CTV viewability where we have really unique viewability solutions and unique solutions that are detecting things like TV off. Those are areas which we talk about a lot. They don’t generate huge amounts of revenue for us yet, but when someone looks at the basket of goods they’re buying, they want to look at core solution plus innovations around the edges, they really matter, and they help us close new deals.

And Youssef, on your second question, on the gross margin side, revenue less cost of sales, it was 80% in Q1 and – we expect it to remain relatively stable around those levels as we chose to continue to invest in our infrastructure. So it’s a choice we’re making to invest in it.

That’s helpful. Okay. Thank you.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mark for closing comments.

Thank you all for the great questions. And I’d like to take the time to thank the DV team worldwide for their hard work and commitment to our mission and for delivering another great quarter of results and also to thank all of our stakeholders, our customers, partners and investors for their continued support. We look forward to seeing many of you at upcoming conferences and events. Have a great evening, everybody.

Thank you. This does conclude today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and thank you again for your participation.