So at a big picture, you know, I think there have been events that have narrowed sort of the market's opinion of what the outcomes could be. Right? So there's more certainty. And even the passage of time gives us more certainty. So policy-wise, you know, we're sitting here with the Fed looking like they're firmly committed to some level of eases over the next, you know, two to three meetings. You've also seen a lot of policy outcomes from the administration becoming more clear. So I think the market has reacted to that. But one of the things that does happen is, you know, there's a short-term focus for the markets. And, you know, in our long-term way of thinking and just recognizing everything that we talk about in the global environment, demographics, migration, geopolitics, all of that, that doesn't take away the probability for tail events. Right? There's also, like, massive amounts of liquidity still available in the markets that are driving asset flows that are affecting options prices. Right? So as we look at the fundamentals, the technicals, the psychology, we're evaluating, you know, the whole picture. You know, we like the idea of buying out-of-the-money protection here. Because, you know, the environment isn't as calm as it looks. That's kind of our opinion. So that's the thought process. I mean, the market has shrugged off a lot. You know, I think there's one particular sector in the market that's driving a lot of the thought process, and that's, you know, the advent of AI. But, you know, the rest of the economy still exists. They're still vulnerable to shocks. And that part is really what we how we think about. And as you know, you know, the big money in this sector gets lost or made during periods of extreme volatility. And so we have to think about those scenarios. And even if they're a low probability, we have to be ready. And we think about when protection is cheap, we're doing that thought process. T.J., did you have anything else to add on that?