Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Dycom Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, today's call is being recorded. I'll turn the conference now over to your host, Mr. Steven Nielsen. Please go ahead.

Thank you, John. Good morning, everyone. I'd like to thank you for attending this conference call to review our second quarter fiscal 2014 Dycom results. During the call, we will be referring to a slide presentation, which can be found on our website, www.dycomind.com, under the heading Events. Relevant slides will be identified by number throughout our presentation. Going to Slide 2. Today, we have on the call Drew DeFerrari, our Chief Financial Officer; and Rick Vilsoet, our General Counsel. Now, I will turn the call over to Rick.

Thank you, Steve. Referring to Slide 3. Except for historical information, the statements made by company management during this call may be forward-looking and are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements, including those related to the company's outlook, are based on management's current expectations, estimates and projections and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause the company's actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. These risks and uncertainties are more fully described in the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 27, 2013, and other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements. Steve?

Thanks, Rick. Now moving to Slide 4 and a review of our second quarter results. As you review these results, please note that we have included adjusted EBITDA, certain revenue amounts excluding revenues from acquired subsidiaries and storm restoration services, certain expense amounts excluding acquisition-related costs and write-off of deferred financing costs and adjusted earnings per share, all of which are non-GAAP financial measures to our release and comments. See slides 13 through 16 for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the GAAP measures in the slide presentation provided for this call. As we stated in our prerelease of February 10, results for our second quarter were sharply impacted by adverse weather. Revenue for the quarter increased year-over-year to $390.5 million, an increase of 5.7%. After excluding revenues from acquired subsidiaries from this quarter and the year-ago quarter and $16.7 million of storm restoration services in the year-ago quarter, revenue grew 0.9% organically. Gross margins declined 219 basis points year-over-year, reflecting major snowfalls and extremely cold temperatures, which reduced the number of available work days and negatively impacted productivity. Including integration cost of approximately $700,000, general and administrative expenses, after excluding prior year acquisition cost, increased 94 basis points year-over-year as a percentage of revenue, reflecting underabsorption of expenses as a result of weather-impacted revenues. All of these factors produced adjusted EBITDA of $28.2 million for the second quarter or 7.2% of revenue, and a net loss of $0.09 per share for the second quarter compared to a non-GAAP net income of $0.15 per share in the year-ago quarter. Operating cash flow was strong in the quarter at $86.6 million, with cash and availability under our current credit facility totaling $215.6 million. During the quarter, we repurchased 360,900 of our own shares at an average price of $27.71. Overall,…

Thanks, Steve, and good morning, everyone. As a reminder in today's conference call materials, there is disclosure of certain non-GAAP measures, including items such as organic revenue growth, adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP EPS. In the materials, we have provided a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP measures. Going to Slide 7. Contract revenues for Q2 of 2014 were $390.5 million, including revenue from acquired subsidiaries of $111.5 million. Adverse weather during the latter part of the fiscal quarter sharply impacted our results. Adjusted EBITDA of $28.2 million was down compared to $37.2 million in Q2 '13. And we incurred a loss per share for the current quarter of $0.09 per share compared to non-GAAP net income of $0.15 per diluted share in Q2 of '13. Turning to Slide 8. As a reminder, the Q2 '13 amounts included only 8 weeks of results for those businesses we acquired in December of 2012. The Q2 '14 amounts include the full quarter of results for all of the acquired subsidiaries. So as you review the results, please note that there are several variances due to our increased scale. On an organic basis, revenue grew 0.9% from increases with several key customers, including wireless and cable operators. Growth was partially offset with declines in services for rural customers and due to the impact of adverse weather. G&A depreciation and interest were all up year-over-year as the businesses acquired in fiscal 2013 were included for a full period this year. Gross margins, EBITDA and net loss were all impacted by the extreme weather conditions experienced during Q2 this year. Turning to Slide 9. Our balance sheet remains strong, and we increased liquidity to $215.6 million during the quarter. Operating cash flows were solid at approximately $86.6 million even after making our semiannual…

Thanks, Drew. Moving to Slide 12. Within an improving economy, we experience the effects of a solid industry environment and capitalized on our significant strengths. First and foremost, we maintained solid customer relationships throughout our markets. We continued to win projects and extend contracts at attractive pricing. Secondly, the strength of those relationships and the extensive market presence they have created have allowed us to be at the forefront of evolving industry opportunities. The end market drivers of these opportunities remain firm and are strengthening. Telephone companies are deploying fiber-to-the-home and fiber-to-the-node technologies to enable video offerings. And in some instances, 1 gigabit high-speed connections. These deployments are accelerating and impacting our business. Some of those telephone companies deploying fiber-to-the-node are expanding fiber-to-the-home trials, while others have initiated larger deployments. Cable operators are continuing to deploy fiber to small and medium businesses with an increasing urgency. Some are doing so in anticipation of the customer sales process. In one instance, a cable operator has indicated that it is exploring combining some fiber-to-the-home deployments with its fiber-to-the-business initiatives. Overall, cable capital expenditures are expanding. Wireless carriers are upgrading to 4G technologies, creating meaningful growth opportunities in the near to intermediate term, as well as planning to increase macro cell density. Industry participants continue to aggressively extend fiber networks for wireless backhaul services. These services are now planned for small cells, as well as macro cells. Limited pilot surveys for initial small cell deployments are underway. Dramatically increasing wireless data traffic may prompt further wireline deployments. As we look out over the intermediate term, we are increasingly encouraged that these current end market drivers are clear signals of an emerging industrywide consensus that network bandwidth, both wireline and wireless, needs to increase dramatically in response to consumer demand and competitive realities. We are encouraged that we've already seen some limited impact of this emerging consensus on our business. Previous periods in which industry consensus has changed sharply, such as dial-up to broadband, broadband to fiber deep or fiber to the home, and cellular voice to wireless data have been accompanied by significant growth opportunities for us. We are hopeful that this looming transition may be as or more rewarding than previous industry consensus transitions, given our scale, market position and capital structure. Among service providers of our size or larger, we believe we are uniquely positioned, managed and capitalized to meaningfully experience an improving industry environment to the benefit of our shareholders. We remain encouraged that our major customers possess significant financial strength and are initiating or remain committed to multiyear capital spending initiatives, which, in some cases, are meaningfully accelerating. We remain confident in our strategies, the prospects for our company, the capabilities of our dedicated employees, and the experience of our management team, who have grown our business in capitalization many times before. Now, John, we will open the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] And we'll first go to the line of Saagar Parikh with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

First off, I wanted to get some color, you guys mentioned you went through all your different end market opportunities. I know last week Google announced that they're going to be expanding their Google Fiber network to 34 cities. Steve, could you just -- I don't know how much in detail you can go into it, but from what you can, at any level, just give us an idea of what you think the market size could be for you guys and opportunities out there?

Sure. I think there is a couple of things that are important to note about the Google announcement last week. #1, it's really 9 DMAs that they talked about, so the 34 cities are clustered in 9 geographic regions across the country. And what's important to note is that those are fairly widely dispersed, so everything from the East Coast through the middle part of the country onto the West Coast. And in 8 of those 9 DMAs, we're actually working for an incumbent provider cable or telephone company, or in some instances both. So it shows kind of the breadth of our coverage of the industry that it matches well with what Google has announced. I think the other thing that's important to note is that it is supportive of our view that kind of this consensus around the 1 gigabit connection being kind of the standard or what people aspire to in the near term, I think, is clearly evident. In fact, I think they also have talked in their announcement that they may even be thinking about a 10 gigabit product down the road. So clearly it shows that demand for bandwidth is something that they feel is going to be sustained. And in terms of the opportunity for us, I mean, we really don't have any specific comments other than to say that clearly in the past, when a consensus has changed around what competitive bandwidth needs to be provided, that there are tremendous opportunities for the company.

And then could you guys tell us if you've done any work for Google yet in Austin, Kansas City or in Utah?

I mean we're not going to comment in any specific way of whether we've worked for them or not at this point.

Okay, no worries. And then lastly, on your capital allocation, you had $10 million in buybacks in the quarter, paid down $59 million in debt. Can you just give us an idea of how you're thinking about your capital and your cash going forward?

Sure. So we continue to have some acquisition opportunities that we're looking at. I think it's always going to be a case of looking at, first, what we need to support organic growth to the extent that we see large projects coming down the path. We want to make sure that we have a good balance sheet, and we do, and adequate financial capability to tackle anything that comes along. I think then we'll look at acquisitions that expand our footprint and relationships versus share repurchases based on valuation. It's just -- it's an art, not a science. But we want to make sure that we make the company not only bigger, but better, and part of better is making sure we have the right capital allocations.

Okay. And then sorry, last question from my end. With that Time Warner Cable, Comcast potential deal, is there any worry that -- them going through a potential M&A process could end up weakening or having Time Warner cut back on their CapEx and then that could impact your build plans?

Yes, I think there's a couple of things to note. So we work for both Comcast and Time Warner. In fact, we've worked for Comcast now for 17 years from the time that they went from having 3 million or 4 million subscribers to potentially 30 million. And generally, throughout all those M&A transactions, they have been pretty consistent that as they've got larger, they deployed capital that continued to improve their network and competitive positioning. So we're not -- we are encouraged with Comcast's involvement with Time Warner. I think secondly, the Time Warner folks have pretty clearly articulated that while they go through the approval process of the merger that they have rolled out a 3-year plan at the end of January, and they plan to execute against that. And as we -- as I noted, it included a significant increase to CapEx. So it's a little hard to see that in a weather-impacted quarter, but we have no reason to believe that they won't do exactly what they've been saying.

Our next question is from Simon Leopold with Raymond James.

This is actually Victor Chiu in for Simon Leopold. I just want to get a few housekeeping questions out of the way. Can you give us the breakdown for the segments for telco cable and et cetera?

Sure, Victor. I'll just start by giving you the next 5 on the customers as well. So Windstream was at 6% -- #6 at 4.6% of revenue. Charter was #7 at 4.4% of revenue. Customer #8 was at 1.8% of revenue, and this is for a customer who has requested that we not identify them by name. Customer #9 was Frontier at 1.6% of revenue, and customer #10 was Ericsson at 1.4% of revenue. Telco was 62.4% and cable was at 24.6%.

Agreed. And the utility and the electric?

Sure. It was at 7.5%.

Great. I wanted to ask about your guidance for your April quarter. It seems that your sales guidance for the April quarter has come down from your initial outlook in November presumably from the weather impacts from the beginning of the quarter. But your gross margin continues to imply improvement from the third quarter of '13. So can you just provide some color around the mix there and what's impacting gross margin particularly, given your speciality growth, soft gross margin this quarter?

Yes, as with anything, Victor, there's always a mix shift. And in this particular case, there are shifts towards projects and customers where we see a little better margin opportunities overall in the business. And clearly, the third quarter, particularly when you recall that the quarter starts the last week of January for us, continue to have some weather impacts in February, and a little bit even past our prerelease of February 10. So, I mean, we feel good about the margin profile of the business and given the opportunities with the gross prospects are in the intermediate term.

Okay. I mean, if the impact was really strictly the weather, will it be reasonable to expect that the April quarter would reflect unseasonally better growth, better growth maybe to reflect kind of catching up from previously?

Remember, Victor, it includes February. And the other thing is, and it's clearly a good question, right? So to the extent that we've had weather impacts at the beginning of the calendar year with customers who have calendar year budgeting, right, for those things that are capital driven, we expect that they'll spend their budgets. So nobody is going to -- at the end of the year, say they didn't spend their capital budget, because they got to a slow start because of the weather. Seeing where that comes through throughout the year, we're just going to be conservative on seeing exactly how that plays out, because it does impact their planning process a little bit in the beginning of the year. The other thing is, there is a portion of the business that's maintenance and kind of more economically sensitive. And so we'll just have to see what that does to the first quarter GDP and how that comes back through and the rest of the year. But on the capital side, the customers will spend their budgets. In fact, as I'm sure you're aware, a number of our cable customers essentially all raised their capital budget. So I'm not sure they're going to spend it.

Well, your headcount, I wanted to ask, also declined quite a bit this quarter by nearly 700. But you're emphasizing that the fundamental growth remains strong.

I don't think it declined exactly that much, but it's a seasonal impact on the business. There was a little bit of rotation between contracts, but primarily seasonal.

Okay. So it's not a reflection of your outlook or anything with that or...

No.

And next we'll go to Adam Thalhimer with BB&T Capital Markets. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Wanted to ask first about Slide 12. Steve, I mean, your -- it seemed a little bit more bullish about the end market drivers now sending clear signals of an emerging industrywide consensus. And I'm just curious what -- is there something you're seeing on the engineering side of your business that would lead to that optimism?

Well, I wouldn't say specifically the engineering, Adam. But if we think back since we last spoke kind of at the end of November, and you think about the number of industry announcements that have focused on expanding capital budgets and expanding 1 gigabit wireline deployments, I just think that we've seen -- it has not been surprising to us that the capital spend came out -- the guidance from our customers has come out the way it has, nor that they continue to be focused on significantly increasing bandwidth to residential consumers. So I just think we continue to see confirmation. AT&T last year had announced the Austin project for 1 gigabit fiber to the home. Several months ago, they expanded the footprint of that opportunity. We also pay attention to customers like Time Warner that not only raised CapEx, but provide a 3-year outlook, so that when you see multiyear plans being articulated, that's a good way to measure confidence and conviction around the spend by our customers. So I just think that the data is pretty universally indicated that opportunities are increasing, and that the consensus around kind of where bandwidth needs to go continues to head up to 1 gigabit. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: And what are your thoughts on -- right, because every single cable customer that you work for has CapEx of 15% to 20% this year projected. And then when do you really start to feel that? What's the timing on that?

Well, there's a couple of things, right? So we're going to see that in project flows. They go through a planning cycle. And so it usually doesn't show up the first week of January. And this year with the weather, it certainly didn't. But I think you'll see them accelerate the spend throughout the year, particularly once we get past these weather impacts. There are certainly elements in that CapEx, particularly at 1 customer that are heavily around going all digital and increased CPE deployments, and our subsidiaries in that business have seen that begin to pick up. But we would expect that it would be something that would accelerate throughout the year. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: I guess, because the only thing that confuses me a little bit with your guidance, which for the next 2 quarters is at or in line -- or I would say in line with or above consensus. The only thing surprising a little bit was the Q4 revenue guidance of low-single digits. And I'm curious, is there anything that's holding you back given that kind of customer CapEx growth?

Yes, and I think there, Adam, that clearly the headwind to the extent that there is a headwind, a tactical headwind in our environment, is that you have the stimulus roll-off. And then in the subsidiaries that we acquired in December of 2012, they really outperformed our original revenue expectation for the first 12 months post-closing. But we do expect them to settle somewhat as they were more heavily focused on stimulus-related projects. So I just think it's kind of a normal rotation that you see occasionally, although the stimulus that's rolling out in terms of the original magnitude of the spend in -- for folks like ourselves are certainly going to be much smaller and of shorter duration than the trends that we see more globally throughout the rest of the industry. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. And then just lastly for me, I mean, I wanted to take one more shot at the engineering side of the business. I mean, is there anything -- are there any big programs that you see coming that we don't know about?

Well, if they were not... Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Maybe they're just trends like small cells, something like that.

I mean, clearly as we noted in our comments, Adam, I mean, we have seen some limited pilot surveys for small cell deployments. I think the technology is still shifting around a little bit. There's absolutely pretty universal conviction that, that will be deploying probably latter half of '14 into '15 and accelerating, because it's an important part of all of the wireless carrier strategies. So, yes, we're seeing opportunities. They are real opportunities. They have specific geographies. They're just not ripe yet to talk about, or to incorporate in a significant way in our future outlook. But there's good reason for us to be optimistic.

Our next question is from John Rogers with D.A. Davidson. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: One sort of technical question. Steve, I'm curious, how much of your fiber deployment right now is aerial versus underground?

So it's always been a mix, John. So for the cable-TV industry, we've always done both aerial and varied fiber deployments. And so we probably have the largest fleet of fiber placing equipment of probably anybody in the country as a single entity. When we did the work for Verizon and continue to do the work for Verizon around their FiOS program, because the phone companies have different union rules for their own employees, that the vast majority of that was buried. But in terms of having capability around aerial fiber placing and splicing, we have very significant capabilities in part, because the stimulus projects, which were largely rural, had a pretty significant aerial element to them. So both around fiber placing and splicing in either buried or aerial environments, it's not a problem. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Okay. I mean, are they -- is it roughly equal in terms of work activity right now?

Well, it may be equal in terms of mileage placed, although I would say buried is a little bit higher. But clearly, the buried construction is more expensive. And so on a dollar value basis, even if the mileage was equal, the buried would be always of a greater revenue value. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: And is that changing in the years ahead?

To the extent that the cable operators push more fiber out, which they're doing with their fiber to businesses, and to the extent that anybody else enters a market on a new basis, then there'll be probably a greater proportion of aerial fiber in those situations, just because it's cheaper in the long run. To the extent that we continue to see folks like AT&T do gigabit deployments, it will really depend on what part of the country you're in as to what flexibility they have around aerial deployments using outsourced labor versus their own people. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Okay. I was just curious about that. And then the second question I have is, and this is looking out over the next couple of years, but with the Quanta acquisition now fully absorbed, I believe, is it logical now that you can sustain 20% gross margins on a annual basis with the kind of market that you're seeing now?

Yes, John, there's nothing structurally in the business that says that the gross margin should not be at that area. To the extent, John, and it relates to your first question, to the extent that we can address a broader portion of the markets including aerial and splicing that's supportive of better margins, it's also supportive of less seasonality. I mean, this winter was so cold, it impacted all types of work activities. But when -- in years past where we have more of our business, particularly with cable operators associated with large aerial deployments of cable, those types of deployments are less seasonally impacted than buried construction for obvious reasons. So, yes, I mean, the mix shift is helpful. I think the other factor in thinking about it is unlike other deployments in the past, there are more opportunities today where we are also supplying the cable and equipment and miscellaneous hardware. And those generally have gross margins that are slightly less than just labor only. And so I think that's the only offsetting mix factor going the other way. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Okay. And then last question, if I could, is with your expansion, well, is it 18 months ago? I can't remember now...

15 months ago. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Into the wireless business?

Oh, sure, it depends, yes. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Are there other opportunities for acquisitions there? Or is it you intent to continue to grow that, organically

I mean, we've did both the acquisition initially in 2010 and late 2010, and then obviously, as part of the acquisition from Quanta, we picked up some wireless businesses there, and that we grew organically in our legacy business. And we continue to see opportunities there. It's probably a business where we feel good about the organic opportunities, particularly as Sprint starts looking at this 2.5G opportunity, as well as kind of a rotation way from using OEMs. So I think it will always be a mix, John, just like the rest of our businesses. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Okay. But will we see you as a more significant factor in some of these turf agreements that your competitors talk about?

Well, I mean we're currently a turfing partner with AT&T in 4 states, that's going well. To grow a business from nothing to in excess of $100 million in 13, 14 months is it's a lot of work. And so I think as long as we're providing good service, we'll have opportunities, not only in what I would call traditional macro cells, but we'll have opportunities around small cells. And quite honestly, as the wireless industry increasingly looks to densification using small cells, our skill set around fiber placement and splicing is probably going to become ever more relevant to wireless carriers.

Next question is from Noelle Dilts with Stifel. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: I'd like to just expand on this wireless idea a little bit. But first, could you tell us what your wireless revenues were in the quarter?

It was about 11% of revenue, Noelle, it was seasonally impacted to about 11%. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. And then you're hearing from some of the competitors out there that resources for tower climbers are pretty tight, and that it's a strained labor environment. Are you increasing the training of your workforce at all? And is that consistent with what you're seeing in the industry?

I mean, quite honestly, Noelle, we're well aware of some of those impacts. We've not had any inability to meet customer needs because of resources. And it may be the parts of the country that we're in, or it may just be that we're in an attractive place for both employees and subcontractors, but it's just not been an issue in our business. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. That's helpful. And then it looked like your DSOs were still kind of a pretty high level in the quarter. As you look forward, do you think there's some room for improvement there as you move into the fourth quarter and into fiscal '15?

So there's a couple of things going on. So as we roll out of the stimulus projects that had retention and other closed-out documentation, it's going to take a period of time for us to work through that process. And so I think that's just kind of a natural thing as any large program, particularly one that has government funding works its way through the business that there'll be an impact there. To the extent that we see growth with cable operators and others and on a relative basis have less business in our locating and installation spaces on a relative basis, the construction, Noelle, will have a little bit higher DSOs. It always has, they always pay, but it takes a little longer to get paid more than to locate an installation businesses which are typically fairly low DSO. But it's really more of a mix issue and working through this close-out process on the stimulus projects. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. And then I think I'm probably pushing it a little bit here, but just going back to the stimulus headwind as we look out to fiscal '15, I mean, is there any -- can you give us any help in terms of kind of how you're thinking about quantifying that headwind as we look out to next year?

So I mean, Drew, I mean if you think about stimulus on a lagging basis, we're probably got a headwind, Noelle, kind of into '15 of somewhere in the $80 million to $100 million, round numbers. But I mean, it depends once again, rotation happens in this business. If rotation happens within the context of much larger opportunities, as those opportunities become evident, the headwind will really just be a source of resources, it won't be a headwind.

And next, we'll go to Alex Rygiel with FBR. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Could you quantify the weather impact in the second quarter?

We took a couple of cuts at looking at that, Alex, and we would tell you that probably 60% of the revenue was in parts of the country where there were pretty dramatic year-over-year declines in temperature. So it was much more broadly based than what we've seen in the past. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Maybe I can ask that in a different way. Your organic growth excluding stimulus in the quarter was 4.5%, which was down from, call it, 15.5% in the previous quarter. Is all of the difference weather?

Yes, I think generally weather was the only factor that we could isolate on that was of any significance. Because it's a comparative question, because in the fiscal -- second quarter of fiscal '13, good portion of the country had no winter. So when you comp the worst winter in a long time against no winter, it has a pretty significant impact. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Okay. And the acquired revenue over the last 12 months was about $530 million. I know that was mostly Quanta and Sage. Definitely ahead of sort of your initial guidance just 1.5 years ago of about $400 million to $450 million. Where was the strength? And did the margins of these acquired businesses also surprise you nicely in the upside?

I think the strength was primarily that the stimulus projects that they had in hand and some other opportunities were stronger than what we expected. Kind of a -- it's still going to be a smaller business looking ahead than it was looking backwards and you saw that in this quarter. But I think it had a longer tail to some trends that were evident that they were going to decline, but they took longer to decline than what we expected. And yes, I think that the margins were a little bit better than we expected going into the deal, and we've got some opportunities for those businesses. Although at this point they're really fully integrated. So I kind of really don't think about them as separate businesses on a go-forward basis. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: And lastly, G&A guidance over the next 6 months seems a little bit high. Can you explain that? And lastly, cash flow from operations in the quarter was very strong, congratulations. But I kind of thought it could have been a little bit better. Anything I'm missing there besides DSOs as it relates to the stimulus work in cable?

Sure. So in terms of the G&A, we have -- we had a larger pool of employee equity, because we added 2,200, 2,300 acquired employees, and so we have more expense that we're forecasting in the fourth quarter. We've got some other things that we're working on preparing kind of -- adds scale for the company. We also have the Sage business that was acquired part way through the fourth quarter of '13 that will be for the G&A for the entirety of the fourth quarter of '14. In terms of operating cash flow, Drew?

Hey, Alex. And I think I called it out in my comments, in Q2, there's a couple of things that are there. One, as we make our semiannual interest payment on the notes, which was just above or just under $10 million. And then the other piece is just making required income tax payments, it's based on a formula where it annualizes the first quarter results, which was obviously a good quarter. And so we've made income tax payments during the quarter of about $21 million so.

I think the other thing if you had to look at the accounts payable declined about $20 million. And that's just a function of the receivables coming down and we're going to have a matching that uses cash to relieve payables.

Our next question is from Christian Schwab with Craig-Hallum Capital Group.

Steven, as you look at these future substantial opportunities, I mean, the market drivers here on Page 12 that you highlighted, as we monitor this over the near and immediate term, can you rank those 4 opportunities in order of what you believe is the -- could have the most substantial impact on future revenue?

So, not surprisingly, they're kind of in that order, Christian. So if I think for us, given the strength of the company and our geographic presence in wireline and cable, right? I really think that the opportunities are going to be around fiber deployments. So whether it's for the phone companies that we outlined in the first bullet or for the cable operators in the second bullet, I think that's it. Now clearly we have some great wireless opportunities. It's a smaller business. And so those opportunities have less impact against the total. And probably the last bullet point, particularly those around small cells, I think that's kind of an emerging trend where you're going to see carriers talking about and others talking about the opportunities that, that provides to improve network quality, all of which are services that we can provide to them today.

And we have a follow-up from Noelle Dilts. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: I just had a couple of housekeeping questions. First, were there any integration costs associated with the Quanta assets in the quarter?

Yes, Noelle, it's about $700,000. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: And then do you expect any, going forward?

At this point, we're not going to call out any integration expenses. I mean, there's always going to be something, legal entity work or some other thing we do, but kind of part of the ordinary course. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division: Right. And then sorry if I missed this, but could you give the underground facility locating in electrical utility revenue?

Drew, go ahead.

So on the underground facility customers it was 7.5%. And then the electrical and other was 5.5%.

And we have a question from Alan Mitrani with Sylvan Lake Asset Management.

Can you point us towards your mid-teens EBITDA margin goals over the next few years, and just explain to us maybe how we're going to get there, whether it's going to be more gross margin leverage, SG&A leverage, revenue leverage? Just give us some insight in terms of how you can benefit from this industry uptick.

Sure. So, Alan, as we've talked about before, the first and foremost way you do it is as demand increases, particularly when you have a number of customers from a competitive perspective trying to enhance network capabilities, gives you an ability to be selective about what you do, not necessarily just with respect to customer, but part of geography capabilities internally to concentrate on those areas where we're best suited to do the business. Clearly, when you get the revenue opportunity, right, you're going to get leverage on G&A and the amortization cost that arose out of the acquisition from an EPS perspective. But clearly, it's always about pricing productivity on the top line and then leverage and continued efficiency initiatives on the G&A side.

Okay. But to an earlier question that came in, your gross margins haven't been above 20% in what will be almost a decade now. So I guess that becomes the new norm. Do you think with your customers being multiple times the size of you, although not your competitors multiple times the size, that you can get this model back up to 20% gross margins in the nearest term?

Alan, there's a couple of things to keep in mind. The material and inventory that's associated with that, that runs through the P&L is also higher than it ever was 10 years ago. So there's a mixed element that's associated with that. Clearly, from a demand environment to the extent that we have a change in consensus, that has always given us greater opportunities than what we've probably seen over the last 10 years, especially the last 5, which were the worst recession since the depression. So from my perspective, we're really just going to get back to kind of a demand environment where what we're good at in providing value to customers will be something that they're willing to pay for.

Okay. And then I appreciate that insight. And then, Drew, on the DSOs, I hear the retention issue, and I have to assume the weather probably hurt you in collecting any sort of receivable this past quarter. Any insight on that?

Alan, the only thing I would tell you is that to the extent you're doing punchlist to get retention and final billings approved, we weren't doing many punchlist items in North Dakota during the quarter, right. So there's always going to be some weather impact there. The rest of it is probably just more ministerial and that there's just things that need to get done back-and-forth with the government to get these projects close out.

And we do have a follow-up from Alex Rygiel. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Hey, Steve, is there any way to quantify what your organic backlog growth is for 12-month backlog year-over-year, excluding stimulus?

I mean, we have, historically, we've not broken it down that way. But clearly, we haven't booked any stimulus in the last year of any significance. So I think you can say whatever was in there rotated out during the period and has been replaced by backlog with other customers. I think if you look at kind of our top 5 customers and saw growth there of 11% in a quarter, once again, in a quarter that was comping a winter versus no winter, clearly, that growth in those top 5 customers is backed up by backlog.

And with that, no further questions in queue.

Okay. Well, we thank everybody for taking the time to participate in the call today, and we look forward to speaking with you again the week before Memorial Day on our April quarter results. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.