Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Fourth Quarter 2014 Emergent BioSolutions Earnings Conference Call. My name is Jackie, and I'll be the operator for today. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, we will be facilitating a question-and-answer session towards the end of today's presentation. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to the company. Please proceed.

Thank you, Jackie. Good afternoon everyone. My name is Robert Burrows, Vice President of Investor Relations for Emergent. Thank you for joining us today as we discuss our financial results for the fourth quarter and 12 months of 2014 and our outlook for 2015. As is customary, our call today is open to all participants. In addition, the call is being recorded and is copyrighted by Emergent BioSolutions. Participating on the call with prepared comments will be Dan Abdun-Nabi, President and Chief Executive Officer. Following Dan's prepared comments we will conduct a Q&A session at which time other members of senior management will be available to participate specifically Bob Kramer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Adam Havey, Executive Vice President and President of our BioDefense Division; and Barry Labinger, Executive Vice President and President of our BioSciences Division. Before we begin I will remind everyone that during today’s call either in our prepared comments or the Q&A session, management may make projections and other forward-looking statements related to our business, future events, our prospects for future performance. These forward-looking statements reflect Emergent’s current perspective on existing trends and information. Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Please review our filings with the SEC on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K for more information on the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. During our prepared comments or the Q&A session, we also may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that involve adjustments to GAAP figures in order to provide greater transparency regarding Emergent’s operating performance. Please refer to the tables found in today’s press release, regarding our use of adjusted net income, EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation between these non-GAAP financial measures and our GAAP financial measures. For the benefit of those who maybe listening to the replay, this call was held and recorded on March 05, 2015. Since then Emergent may have made announcements relating to topics discussed during today’s call. So again, please reference our most recent press releases and SEC filings. Emergent BioSolutions assumes no obligation to update the information in today's press release or as presented on this call except as may be required by applicable laws or regulations. Today's press release may be found on the Investors home page of our website. And with that introduction, I would now like to turn the call over to Dan Abdun-Nabi, Emergent BioSolutions' President and CEO. Dan?

Well thank you Bob and good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining our call. Today I would like to provide an overview of our 2014 performance, highlight some of our recent business achievements, and lastly discuss our 2015 outlook. Let's start with a review of our 2014 performance. We recognize fourth quarter total revenue of 148 million up 51% from 2013 and full year total revenue of 450 million up 44% from last year and at the top of the range given at JP Morgan Conference on January 11th. Our GAAP net income in the fourth quarter was 30 million up 98% from 2013 and full year GAAP net income was 36.7 million up 18% from last year. Adjusted net income in the fourth quarter was 34.6 million up 104% from 2013 and full year adjusted net income was 54.2 million up 44% from last year. EBITDA in the fourth quarter was 53.3 million, up 84% from 2013 and full year EBITDA was 92.2 million up 46% from last year we closed 2014 with a cash position of $280 million and increase of 101 million compared to 2013. Shifting over to 2014 business achievements I’d like to start with our BioDefense Division and Building 55 which is our large scale BioThrax manufacturing facility. We continue to work on progressing Building 55 to licensure and last month we announced that the primary end points in our pivotal study were met. The study showed that vaccine produced and Building 55 is comparable to that manufacturing Building 12 are currently approved facility. We have sent to summary of key data to the FDA and plan to submit and to me we’re done this month to discuss our SBOA filing strategy. The remainder of 2015 will entail completing the final study report, the…

Hey guys this is Ryan in for Jessica. Thanks for taking my questions. I guess I just have two right now. So, does the FDA need to re-inspect the facility after you guys have completed your investigation? And then second in terms of your ability to fulfill the contract post 2016 do the economics change, thanks?

Well thank you for the question. So first as to FDA re-inspection, no, investigations like this or customary on our business if there was a deviation. We routinely conducted investigation. We completed our reports and at the next normal inspection cycle for the FDA they will review this along with any other reports that we have developed in our normal manufacturing processes. So, no special FDA re-inspections or approvals are required. And second, with respect to your question on the CDC performance, I am not sure I really understood it if you could repeat it or clarify for me that would be helpful.

Great, sorry. when you say what’s the current contract that you have with BioThrax with the delay in sort of sending back those lots to the government in that contract are there sort of penalties for delay in delivery of product?

Okay now I understand. No I think interactions with the CDC, the delivery schedules have been quite flexible. We have adjusted them from time to time and at this point the CDC is looking to secure as many doses as we can deliver in order to satisfy the contract so, I don’t see any issues in adjusting delivery schedules under the contract that we presently have. Nor do I presently anticipate that there would be delays beyond the ultimate delivery date in the contract.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

And your next question comes from the line of Marc Frahm with Cowen & Company. Please proceed.

Hi thanks for taking my call I was just wondering if you could give us a little bit more details on kind of what needs to happen for the best case scenario of your no financial impact and then alternatively for the $65 million impact and what gives you confidence that that’s the high end?

Yes, thank you for the question so the first thing that we need to do is complete the investigation, and the outcome of the investigation will inform us as to ultimately what the impact is on the lots that we presently have. As you know we have identified two lots that have been impacted and I indicated those two lots will be slated for rejection the remaining 13 lots we have absolutely no evidence to suggest that they are implicated in any way in this particle, this foreign particle issue so presently I have no basis to conclude that any of those lots would be adversely affected but we need to await the final disposition of the investigation to have a conclusion on that and its really the 13 lots that are driving the ultimate issue with respect to impact your revenue.

So I mean I guess the zero would be if all 13 are cleared and ultimately delivered in the 65 is all 13 of those are ultimately rejected?

That is the way we are thinking about it presently that’s correct.

Okay and then I mean I understand and the last question you don’t anticipate the FDA having inspection on this. Has there been communication already with the FDA about this from you?

Yes we have voluntarily advised the FDA to keep them abreast of the issue.

And I mean have they responded to any of that or no?

You know I really don’t want to get into the interactions with the agency that we have. What I would tell you is I would consider the discussions with the FDA to be normal standard and collegial.

Okay and then last question I have, believe there may have been – so Eric who I work with has a recollection that there was a similar issue maybe a handful of years ago and is that an accurate recollection and then to can you remind us what that is?

Yes we’ve never had an issue like this issue in our history. This is the first so we are proceeding very cautiously in terms of how we handle it. We want to make sure that we have full information before making final decisions and I think that’s appropriate. In terms of prior history I don’t have any recollection like that. Adam is there anything ringing a bell with you on that?

No, not on this type of investigation. I think there was one incident in the first quarter where we didn’t deliver batches but it was unrelated to anything like this result, potency standard requalification.

Oh yes, we were requalifying a standard at that time that’s right.

Okay. Right, thank you.

And your next question comes from the line of Jim Molloy with Summer Street. Please proceed.

Hey, thanks for taking my questions. The zero to 65 in the first quarter effectively for BioThrax you said zero -- the first quarter for BioThrax, it’s curiously been one of the lowest quarters, around 30 million or 25 million ranges, does it ruin that out, is the 65 that sort of impacts the second quarter as well?

So your recollection about first quarter is deliveries and the magnitude is correct and I am not sure I understand your follow on, on the second quarter Bob did you understand that question?

The question is how do you get the 65 million in the first quarter or does that necessarily mean that the first quarter to be zero and we could cut second quarter in half as well?

So, Jim this is Bob. The zero to 65 is our best estimate of the potential range of impact based on the entire 13 lots that are under quarantine today. It is not specific to the first quarter it is really a 2015 annual number. But to Dan’s point as well your recollection of our typical Q1 BioThrax shipments in revenue that’s correct so that will not happen in Q1 of 2015.

Presuming only a fewer lots are impacted I mean this is a situation where you could make up the first quarter of short fall by simply -- you kind of make any more it’s just that take the ones that are currently in quarantine and if they are okay ship them right?

That’s correct. If I think as Marc had commented before, if all of these 13 lots at the conclusion of the investigation are released for commercial distribution then we would expect a negligible impact on 2015.

And I do want to reiterate that these in quarantine is really our cautionary approach because we really have no evidence to suggest that the two lots that had particles in them really still over had any effect on any of the other lots in inventory and more over each and every lot that we produce undergoes a visual inspection. 100% visual inspection twice over so two 100% visual inspections and that’s a validated process. So I have a degree of confidence that those lots really are not affected by what we are seeing with the two lots that were rejected.

Okay, great. So it may well be and not as bad as it could be in the worse case, any penalties from the U.S. government on having the particles in BioThrax?

I still remember they are not released lots, these in our possession they were never released or in distribution and the answer to your question is no, no penalties for having lots that we reject for whatever reason and what we are responsible for is delivering material that we released under the specifications and our quality control and approval standards that are expected of the product.

Last two questions and I’ll step back in queue, any talk with the CDC about you have the 75 million doses in the FNS is what they want and obviously soon finally after a long journey you should be able to that in a couple of years you know with the billing to be 5. Any talk of maybe that 75 becoming 150 or anything like that and then lastly any updates on the award of an Ebola manufacturing contract? Thank you very much.

Thanks Jim, so nothing to report in terms of the CDC discussions at this point but we will certainly keep people apprised as those start to develop and as you know we been anxiously looking forward to the end of the Building 55 process as you have and we are looking forward to engaging with the CDC, to talk about how best to supply at Building 55. So we will certainly keep everybody apprised. In terms of the EBOLA programs, we are very excited about the interactions with the agency and we hope to have something to announce in the near term.

Thank you guys for taking the questions.

[Operator Instructions]. And your next question comes from the line of Ben [inaudible] with Symphony Asset Management. Please proceed.

Hi, thanks for taking my question, I just want to understand what needs to happen over the next 60 days. So during the next 60 days are your going to focus on just investigating what if the 13 batch is okay for distribution. Or are you also going to focus on what has or on what went wrong, or have you already established what went wrong and you fixed it? Thanks a lot.

Sure, so the investigation is really designed to learn more about the root cost. How did this happen, what is the impact to the product, what potential impact it could be to our process, what improvements we might need to make. So it is really an investigation into a root cause to determine definitive or probable root cause for how this occurred. And then once we understand that, to also understand product impact both with respect to the two lots and finally with respect to the lots that we have in our inventory. So, it is comprehensive analysis to understand what went wrong and impact the product. That's the goal within the next 60 days.

Okay, and 60 days and could it be sooner than that, or 60 days basically a best case scenario?

I don’t think it is a best case scenario. I think it is a reasonable timeline based on the activities that we have laid out for team. The team has laid out actually for them to complete. So I think it is a reasonable time period. I don’t think it is in this case.

Got it and last question from me, so are you currently manufacturing products or are you -- have you suspended any type of manufacturing until the investigation is complete?

No, we are continuing to manufacture sub lots but we have suspended formulation in filling activities at the CMO.

Got it, okay. Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it.

[Operator Instructions]. And with no questions I would like to turn the call back to Mr. Bob Burrows, for the closing remarks.

Thank you Jackie. With that ladies and gentlemen we now conclude the call. Thank you for your participation. Please note an archived version of the webcast of today's call will be available later today and accessible through the company website. Thank you again and we look forward to speaking to all of you in the future. Good bye.