Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Encore's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Vice President of Investor Relations, Bruce Thomas. Mr. Thomas, you may begin.

Thank you, Operator. Good afternoon and welcome to Encore Capital Group's fourth quarter 2018 earnings call. With me on the call today are Ashish Masih, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Jonathan Clark, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and by phone, Ken Stannard, the CEO of Cabot Credit Management, our subsidiary based in the UK Ashish and Jon will make prepared remarks today, and then we'll be happy take your questions. Before we begin, we have a few housekeeping items. Unless otherwise noted, comparisons made on this conference call will be between the fourth quarter of 2018 and the fourth quarter of 2017 or between the full year 2018 and the full year 2017. In addition, today's discussion will include forward-looking statements subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Please refer to our SEC filings for a detailed discussion of potential risks and uncertainties. During this call, we will use rounding and abbreviations for the sake of brevity. We will also be discussing non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings presentation, which was filed on Form 8-K earlier today. As a reminder, this conference call will also be made available for replay on the Investors section of our website, where we will also post our prepared remarks following the conclusion of this call. With that, let me turn the call over to Ashish Masih, our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thanks, Bruce, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining our conference call. Today, Encore announced financial results for the fourth quarter and for the full year. 2018 was a year of significant achievement for Encore, characterized by our accomplishment of key objectives and record results. This is a very good time for the debt buying industry, particularly in the United States and our improving performance reflects a strong position in key markets. As the year began strong forward flow commitment levels drove our expectation that the US market would support an aggressive capital deployment plan with strong returns. In order to capitalize on this favorable purchasing environment, we deployed more in the United States in 2018 than in any prior year. Through our operational innovation and increased productivity global collections and revenues increased to record levels. This performance helped generate record profitability and was key to delivering on our expectation of at least 20% growth in earnings per share for 2018. In July, we completed our acquisition of the remaining interest in Cabot Credit Management. Accordingly, our fourth quarter financial performance includes 100% of the benefit of our full ownership of Cabot for the first time, contributing to our record results. Turning now to our US business; from an operations perspective, collections in the US increased 11% or $123 million in 2018 to the highest level ever. For the quarter collections in the US grew by 15% compared to Q4 of 2017. Our consumer centric approach to collections and improved productivity and driving a higher proportion of call center and digital collections compared to legal collections. As a result, US call center and digital collections for the year were up 25% compared to 2017 and were also up 25% for the quarter versus Q4 of 2017. Our investments in…

Thank you, Ashish. Before I go into our financial results in detail, I would like to remind you that as required by US GAAP, we were showing 100% of the results for Cabot, Baycorp and Refinancia in our financial statements. Where indicated we will adjust the numbers to account for non-controlling interests. Keep in mind that the Cabot transaction was completed in July and therefore we were only partial owners of Cabot for periods before the fourth quarter of 2018. In the fourth quarter Encore earned record GAAP net income from continuing operations of $47 million or $1.50 per share. This compares to $13 million or $0.48 per share in the fourth quarter of 2017. Adjusted income was also a record $45.5 million or $1.45 per share, compared to $28 million or $1.05 per share for the fourth quarter a year ago. I'm pleased to highlight Encore's continued strong cash generation. We believe adjusted EBITDA when combined with collections applied to principal balance is an important measure the return of capital to the business. This cash generation enables a number of valuable activities such as purchasing debt portfolios, reducing debt, expanding collections, capacity and investing in innovation. Our increased level of adjusted EBITDA over the past year has given us the flexibility to achieve record deployments in the US at the same time that we added collections capacity in the US business and completed the Cabot transaction. Global deployments total $247 million in the fourth quarter, compared to $301 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. We deployed a total of $134 million in the US during Q4, all of which represented fresh portfolios charged off credit card paper. This compares to $170 million in US deployments in Q4 of 2017. European deployments totaled of $106 million during the fourth…

Thank you, Jon. In summary, I'm very pleased with Encore's operational and financial performance and excited about our prospects. We reported record earnings for the fourth quarter, as well as records for global cash collections, revenues and earnings for the year. In the US, the market for debt purchasing remains favorable. And we deployed a record amount of capital in 2018 to purchase portfolios to capitalize on this opportunity. In addition, call center and digital collections were up 25% for the year. 2018 was also a transformational year for Encore, during which we increased our ownership of Cabot to 100% and we continue to focus on driving synergies from the transaction. Collections from European debt purchasing grew 15% for the year and revenues which included a full year of Wescot results grew 30% in 2018. Looking forward in Europe, we expect collections from debt purchasing to continue to grow in 2019, and we plan to further grow our capitalized servicing business. During 2019, we expect a higher proportion of our capital deployments to occur in the US to take advantage of the current markets high returns. Importantly, we are well positioned to purchase portfolios with even better returns once the growth in credit card charge off rates begins to accelerate. Now, we'd be happy to answer any questions that you may have. Operator, please open up the lines for questions.

Yes, thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Eric Hagen of KBW. You may proceed with your question.

Great, thank you very much. A follow up on the leverage that you mentioned in your opening comments as it relates to Cabot as well. Have you guys considered a restructuring of any sort of your debt that would make it more commingled with Cabot's in order to, I guess, generate what I would consider maybe a true shared capital model for the company?

Yes. Hi, Eric, this is Jon. Yeah, we've actually been contemplating that even pre closing of the acquisition of Cabot. As you can understand it's quite complicated. And we have a team on it and we're making some good progress, but it's too early to say how that will play out. But I think we're all in agreement that if there's a way to make that happen, I wouldn't phrase it as restructuring, I think we would just evolved into more of a shared model with, if you will, kind of commingled ERC and borrowing bases, but that is certainly the hope, but I'm afraid I'm going to have to - everyone have to stay tuned and see how that plays out.

Okay, well, that's helpful color nonetheless. The strength and acquisitions that you guys are expecting in the US for the year, how do you expect the mix of legal versus call centers to shake out?

Eric, this is Ashish. So the acquisitions that we have - the portfolio that we're buying, they're mostly fresh portfolios in the US and in terms of collections mix and you notice over time the share of call center and digital has been growing and that's part of a concerted strategy to work to resolve debts through the call center with consumers and supplemented now with our investments in digital which provides a multi-channel approach. Now that said, legal is a very important channel still and will continue to be, but as we continue to invest in capacity and on the consumer centric call model we expect our call center and digital collections to continue to slowly increase in proportion. I would caveat that and just add to this comment that depends - the mix depends a bit on other factors as well and can be impacted by, for example, the type of paper we buy. And if it's older or different balances or if there are new books that are legal only books that we purchase that we have done in the past that would impact that number. But if nothing else changes as we continue to push on call center approach and digital approach that mix should continue to tick up slowly over time.

Got it. Thanks, Ashish. That's helpful. One last housekeeping item for me just, how many shares has J.C. Flowers sold since the Cabot acquisition closed in July?

We're not aware that they have sold any shares. Their lockup has expired as of sometime in early January. So it is their decision when they want to sell and what they want to do and we're not aware of any sales to date at this point.

Great, thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from David Scharf of JMP Securities. You may proceed with your question

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Ashish, wanted to focus a little bit on the European market in Cabot and first off notwithstanding the commentary on available liquidity. I'm wondering should we be thinking about the purchasing outlook in Europe lightning this year as more of a reflection of the potential returns you're seeing on portfolio building out there or is it more of a deliberate focus on deleveraging at Cabot?

Thanks for the question David. And by the way just for the record, Ken Stannard is also on the phone from UK, so I will let him jump in as appropriate to the call. So to your question, the returns in Europe are strong and UK they're even stronger for us historically at times and people characterize returns as lower, but we see very strong returns in UK due to our differentiated platform. And we've done benchmarking studies against competitive data and we are able to achieve because of our scale and analytics and just operations, we are more than twice the size of the next player in the UK, for example and the legal scorecards and so forth, we're able to achieve much higher returns in UK compared to others. So we see good returns and we'll keep deploying capital in UK and other parts of Europe as well. You correctly characterized as it's more of a deliberate strategy to just change the balance slightly on the margin as part of deleveraging of Cabot and that some of the players are also doing in Europe and UK at this time that you may have heard. And I'll let Jon jump in as well or Ken after that if there's anything.

Yeah, I think we believe that today the conditions in the London high yield market which ensures you David it's the way folks fund over there have changed in such a way that Cabot and their peers will, I think you can expect to reduce leverage, i.e. one would assume that I think it's all a bit of a zero sum game and that I would expect with that the industry as a whole returns would likely improve because of the less pressure, right. And Cabot, I want to emphasize as opposed to some players, right, we have a large and growing capitalized servicing business in Wescot and we're focusing growing that and increasing our efficiencies in order to help improve our leverage, but I think we certainly do have a goal of reducing leverage in Cabot, right. I'll turn it over to Ken, if you want to add anything Ken.

I think you said it all, nothing as much to add there. We certainly intend to manage our leverage down gradually over time and it's a combination of building the capitalized business, working on continued efficiencies and deploying at high returns.

Got it and as we think about the pace of deleveraging in Cabot this year combined with the expectation for collection growth in Europe and purchasing. Jonathan, should we be in kind of safe territory assuming that the ERC in Europe would close out 2019 below where it closed out 2018?

That's a little hard to tell. I think will - as you know there's a lot that goes into that what multiples buy at et cetera, et cetera, right, so I'm not sure I'm that good of a prognosticator.

We do expect our collections in Europe in 2019 to be higher than 2018, so that's in our plan and again depends on purchasing and so forth. But that's what we expect for sure and ERC will be a result of purchasing Anna collections and so forth so.

So Jon I just want to add, it's absolutely not required to reduce ERC in order to delever, we can still more moderately grow out ERC and still delever quite significantly.

Got it, maybe one last question, shifting to the US market and I appreciate the commentary about the forward looking in speculation when this kind of 10 year recovery finally runs its course. I'm just curious about maybe some of the behavior among the large card issuers that you work with. Obviously you highlighted the magnitude of the forward flow arrangements which partially answers the question. But I'm curious, you compete indirectly with collection agencies, with outsourcing, I mean, to the extent all the issuers have the opportunity to outsource for a fee versus to sell to you and a handful of others. Is there any change? Are you aware of any change in the mix of how the card issuers are dealing with their fresh charge offs, whether they're working more in house selling more or outsourcing more?

David, nothing in that would make a pattern, right. What we know for sure and we see is, all issuers have some sort of capacity which they call internal capacity and it's largely enforced charge off toward agencies and law firms, right. Generally they don't have much internal employees working post charge off and so they always have that and they have assets sales, a debt sales as a channel. And over time we see different issuers going through ebbs and flows in terms of the mix and they're constantly looking at strategies whether to sell - write a charge off for six to 12 months later and that keeps changing and we characterize fresh as zero to six months for example. So there's no pattern I can tell you that's predominant at this time except that each issuer keeps kind of evaluating and if they try to let's say use agencies, but if they don't get the returns to come back to sales, they have quarterly goals as well. So it's a mix of those things and then clearly when you're working through agencies and law firms you have an expense line that you have to bear which is very different than when you have a portfolio sold through the debt sales channel that impacts your losses in a very different way. So they keep evaluating those. I haven't seen any pattern that you can draw on as you look at this stage of the economic cycle and the credit cycle that we're in right now.

Got it, thank you. And I apologize there is actually just one last one I wanted to get in there, big topic this fourth quarter throughout earnings calls as obviously been all the news surrounding tax refund season both the timing and the magnitude of refunds. Based on kind of what you're saying since the US collection industry is so seasonal, should we be thinking about a Q1 kind of collection rate or a year-over-year collection growth, it's maybe a little more on the conservative side, to the extent that refunds are coming in lighter than then historically.

Yeah, that's a very pertinent question. So we started the year very strong in all our collections channels, call center, digital legal, debt settlement agencies and whatnot. And just I would say in the last couple of weeks, we have observed perhaps a little bit of softness that's consistent with some of the reports that the federal agencies put out on tax refund rates, but again, it would be very minimal impact if any on our overall collections maybe 1% or 2%, but I would also be - I don't think I would be wrong to say that that would be perhaps delayed collections. And this is again a first year of refunds after the big tax changes, so it's possible people were able to withhold more and - or reduce the withholding so it's still early to tell, but given you asked, I would say two weeks of slightly some softness in collections, but too early to make a trend and overall it can catch up as well as we found in the prior year's.

Got it. Thank you very much.

You're welcome.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Hugh Miller of Buckingham Research Group. You may proceed with your question.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. Just had one starting off in Europe and it seems like you guys had provided some color there, but then some of the peers have indicated as well as shifting their capital allocation plans for 2019, being a bit more selective with deployment. And also some of them may be focusing a bit more on secured assets, which isn't as much of a focus for Cabot. Can you just give us a sense as to what your expectations are with regard to returns in Europe in 2019 relative to 2018? And given some of the shifts you're seeing, are you seeing [indiscernible] a bit more willing to issue forward flows in the UK and other parts of Europe?

In terms of returns, we expect it to be somewhat similar, at least that's what we're planning and it could get better. The impact of other players in the industry, the buyers in the industry perhaps slowing down purchasing hasn't been felt in terms of returns and multiples yet, but it takes a while as we've seen that in the US as well in the past and at times that are forward flows and things like that, and also the banks have to kind of get used to the new reality. So I think that outcome is yet to be seen. And I would kind of let Ken also provide some color given he sees that in every day and building and purchasing that happens out there in the market to provide any additional color.

Yeah, thank you Ashish. Thanks Hugh for the question. The particular competitor, I think you're alluding to that has the banking license is going to - have to curtail its activity in the unsecured MPL acquisition space which given that there are a large competitor of ours in the UK, it certainly going to mean that there's a reduction in demand in our competitive homeland in the UK. That I think bodes very well for the future in terms of the balance of demand and supply and should be reflected in improved pricing or improved returns. We clearly haven't yet seen that in our results, but I can tell you that some early signals have been seen in some of the bidding activity. So hopefully that will continue and we'll be able to see that come through in the rest of the year. But as Ashish was saying, it's early days at this stage.

Definitely helpful color there, thank you. Some of your peers have indicated in Europe, so sort of the leverage ratios that they're targeting to manage down to. I was wondering obviously you've indicated that you liked to see Cabot delever over time, I certainly understand that that you can still kind of maintain purchasing without being active on growth and still delever the balance sheet a bit. But is there a sense of magnitude that you can talk about in terms of the - where Cabot's leverage is now and kind of maybe over the course of the year where you think you might kind of try to get down to?

Yeah, I think at this point, we're not prepared to share any specific targets, but stay tuned.

Okay, certainly understandable. And then last for me, just as we think about - you talked about some of the forward flows that you've seen in the US and the growth in revolving credit. But as you think about the capital deployment opportunities in the US in 2019 relative 2018 with where we stand now, do you have a rough sense of what you think about in terms of where your deployment maybe relative to 2018 in terms of overall capital expenditures for the US market in 2019?

So as I said in my remarks we do expect to shift proportionally more deployment in US and at this point, I would expect 2019 to be higher than 2018. And we have given the number that you already have in terms of forward flows for the year which is $480 million locked for the year.

Okay, thank you very much.

Sure.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Mark Hughes of SunTrust. You may proceed with your question.

Thank you. Good afternoon. The tax rate outlook for 2019, can you give us any thoughts on that?

Yeah, I would - Mark I would expect it to mid to low 20s.

Mid to low 20s, okay. Am I right on the adjusted number for the fourth quarter, it was roughly 17%, 18%, is that right? What you proposed I think and -

Correct.

Okay, Yeah, the interest expense has been bouncing around a little bit, was down clearly sequentially this quarter, is this a reasonable run rate you think on a go forward basis?

Yeah, if you had to pick a quarter to kind of normalize and use as a run rate, Q4 wouldn't be that.

Very good and then likewise, the legal collections costs, any thoughts as we look at next year, you're clearly having success with the call centers and the digital, are those costs going to be flat?

As I said, we expect to slowly kind of keep changing the mix of away from legal, but it won't be anything material or major that would impact the costs and we are very steady in our legal placements and processing and we are continuing to grow internal legal, so we're pretty steady in terms of placement there's no lumpiness. Now that said, it can change as I said based on the purchasing mix and we may buy certain portfolios that come to market that have a higher proportion of legal or low proportion of legal. That has happened often in the past and that could change things around, but otherwise, we expect it to be kind of fairly steady to what we've been doing last year or so. At this point I'd be - I don't think I can give you a legal collections expense outlook because it's not just the US for the legal collections expenses. There's legal expenses in Europe, including UK and continental Europe, and certain portfolios may incur higher legal expenses if we just enter the different mix of portfolios that we end up buying and we do buy a much wider range of types of asset classes in Europe than in the US.

Very good, one follow on question. You hit your 20% earnings growth target or earnings per share growth target for 2018, care to venture any thoughts about 2019 in terms of EPS growth rate?

It's a good question Mark. At this point, no, so let me just back up a little bit. As I look at the past, we delivered really solid results in 2018. And as I look ahead, Encore is in a very strong position as we look at our key markets. We had record deployments in US and collections in US and Europe and growing in a healthy manner. So we are demonstrating strong collections growth in both markets. When it comes to platforms, where we deploy bulk of our capital, Cabot is differentiated particularly in the UK, where it outperforms other competitors and in US we've improved liquidation through innovation and we're leading in the fresh debt segment. So when I look at our platforms and what we've been able to deliver and I look at in terms of deployment, just to repeat, we expect to deploy more in US compared to 2018. And in Europe, we expect to deploy less in 2019 compared to 2018. And overall in terms of the impact in earnings, we typically don't provide guidance in rare situations where there has been a lot of complexity we have done that, but it's been rare and we do not do that in normal course, so at this point we're not going to be able to provide any guidance on earnings for 2019.

And then one final question, I don't know if you addressed this, but as you think about the returns on the US portfolios you bought in the fourth quarter, say as compared to earlier in the year or this time a year ago, are returns relatively steady but still attractive or they've gotten more attractive?

I would say steady and similar type of returns than earlier in the year.

Very good, thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Brian Hogan of William Blair & Company. You may proceed with your question.

Yeah, good afternoon. First question is a follow up on the interest expense question, to be stable, good runway going forward, I guess, was there a refinancing in the quarter or what drove the sequential decline?

Well, we need to be looking Q-on-Q between '17 to '18 essential up, right.

Yeah, quarter-to-quarter, yeah.

Quarter-to-quarter. Well, in that one there was an extra 3 million in Q4 as a result of some Cabot refinancing. The key costs associated with those are - you may or may not be aware we did - we bought some remaining high yield bond and effectively exchanged them for longer duration bonds and so in that put and take there was fees associated with that which ended up being rolled up into interest expense.

In 4Q, yeah?

In 4Q, right.

Alright, the capital rate - the growth of that business over in Europe is that going to be more through organic relationship business or is that like involved acquisitions or what's - how do you expect to drive that growth?

Ken, you want to take that question?

Yeah, sure. So the vast majority will be organic growth. So we're seeing quite a lot of additional demand and strong pipeline coming through across markets. But specifically in the UK as both regulatory pressures encourages the banks to be looking to outsource some of their sensitive collections operations to the likes of Wescot who have the industry leading compliance capabilities. But also preparing for potential economic downsides means that the banks will want to have further outsourcing capabilities. So if they need to ramp up the collections capabilities they can. So we're seeing a bit of an unprecedented demand at the moment for additional servicing opportunities, which sometimes take a little time to roll out and to implement and these things are done in phases, but certainly bodes well for growth in that business.

And does that cannibalize your purchasing business?

No, it doesn't because - very good question. But it doesn't because it's the early stage collection. So this is really in the pre-charge off space as opposed to post charge off, which is where most of the debt gets sold.

All right, the regulatory environment here in the United States, and you commented on probably in Europe as well. Anything that concerns you, any proposals, any actions that's been taken that you're seeing?

Brian, in the US no material change, what we have is kind of I would say, as I've described in the past three part regulatory environment that we really care about. One is the OCC that guides the banks and regulates banks, asset sales and their agency relationships. And that has not changed at all. Banks still have very high standards they expect from the dead buyers, and they audit us on a very regular basis. And we pass all those audits. So that is still there. So the moat is deep and wide from that point of view. Secondly, on the CFPB front, as we have a new director who's taken charge, so we're waiting to see. The CFPB back in August or September had outlined a timeline which said March 2019 is when they would start the proposed rulemaking process. And as of two weeks ago, when their kind of semiannual report was published, it was still mentioned that March is or at least that's the next timeline, deadline in terms of potential rulemaking that may happen, so we're going to wait for that to happen. It's a month away. It's about almost there that will take several quarters of comments and feedback and so forth before anything goes into effect. And let me just remind you, we think at least based on the advanced notice that happened several years ago, the rules are second nature to us, we should be 60%, 70%, 80%, if you would, things we do already because of a consent order and things we would like to see different would actually help in terms of technology, texting, use of emails much more easily, so bringing debt collection rules in the United States much more into the 21st century. We're hoping for positive movement…

Yeah, just additional color really Ashish, so what I'd say is on the - first one on UK service, on UK FCA compliance as customer conduct really that is what is driving the pipeline increase on the service side. So the banks are wanting to outsource through us as in Wescot to solve some of their sort conduct issues that they have or just to have us manage their operations, so they don't have to worry about the conduct and they can rely on us. So that's what's helping the momentum in those businesses. We'd like to see more of that momentum outside of the UK, but it's a slower story but we're encouraging the regulators to get more active. It's in our interests as a leader in the customer conduct space for that to happen. So what we're really seeing from a banking regulation perspective in Europe, as Ashish was alluding to, is more impacting the balance sheets of the creditors, those organizations selling to us. The specific rule that is creating quite a lot of movement is the fact that two years after April 2018, banks across Europe need to be providing 100% for new non-performing loans in the unsecured space. So by April 2020, they're going to have to take significant right downs of those unsecured assets if they do not sell those assets. So that's why many banks are now considering selling assets where they haven't before. So that's creating good momentum on the debt sales side.

Alright, staying in Europe there, your thoughts on the impact of Brexit then, I wouldn't think there'd be any material impact on your business given the consumer you're dealing with, but what are your thoughts on Brexit?

Very good question and insightful, partial answer on your behalf, so the banks will obviously see a bigger impact in the performing space where you've got customers who are regularly paying the full amount, those customers potentially come under a lot more pressure in a no due Brexit scenario. But those of us who have impaired loans already paying very minimal payments, GBR25 or less a month will see a considerably reduced impact because those customers are already in their own form of a recession already. Having said that, your guess is probably as good as mine is to the probability of have no Brexit in the first place certainly feels at the moment as though the political environment has got very less middle appetite to allow that to happen and I imagine that would be reflected amongst the European Union countries as well, so we'll see what happens.

Great and then one last one for me is your thoughts on the impact of CECL accounting and your plans for implementation and progress there?

Yeah, for the best we actually met earlier today in the meeting to discuss, among other things, the exposure draft preseason, and we're still in the process of evaluating the information from that meeting. As we've noted before, we've established a project management team to address CECL. That team is evaluating CECL model and developing our accounting policy and planning implementation, but I really don't have anything else to share this time at the - exactly how CECL will impact our industry so far is not clear at this point.

Alright, thanks for your time.

Thanks, Brian.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Robert Dodd of Raymond James. You may proceed with your question.

Hi, guys. I've got two clarification questions. You addressed the US tech seasonality and obviously, I mean, you have which we fund so far, the mid February down, 17%, you said it's had very modest impact so far. Can you clarify, if the average refined stays down 17% safer for the whole tax season, would you still expect only that kind of 1% to 2% negative effect on collections, or is that indicative of just the fact that we're relatively early in tax season at this point?

Robert, I think you answered the question. We are very early in the tax season, especially even more early in this kind of recent trend, which is a week or two perhaps. So I'm not sure if it even makes a trend. But it stays that we are still analyzing and the team's initial analysis is maybe it's a couple of percentage points we'll have to see because a lot of our payments - people get money from other sources are in legal processes, maybe garnishments and whatnot. And then in the long-term we also expect liquidation may not be impacted anyway because you get it little bit later. So way too early to give any impact of this very recent one or two weeks of slightly lower tax refund data that we're all seeing at the same time.

Got it, I appreciate that. And then the second one, back to your follow up on Brexit, less on what it could do to the consumer, obviously, but operationally have you got any contingency plans or maybe you don't think that, I mean, obviously if the UK crashes out hard Brexit and drops out of the European data protection zone, for example, is there a plan in place to cope with that or other kind of operational issues that could be impacted rather than what it does to the consumer or doesn't depending on how it turns out?

Ken, can you take that one?

I can absolutely take that. So yeah, a good question. So the two things that you mentioned are exactly in our plan. So one is on the data protection, so at the moment we do move some data across jurisdictions into central data warehouses that would be, we would be able to relatively quickly stop moving a personalized data across the new border between the UK and Europe is that was the eventuality, so we've already planned on how we would do that and how we do that rapidly. On the operational side from a collections perspective, we have got plans for if we had additional call volume coming in and we would expect to have exactly that and we would expect to be able to cope with the additional volume that we've modeled, so good points and we should be adequately prepared.

Okay, got it. I appreciate it. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from John Rowan of Jenny Montgomery Scott. You may proceed with your question.

Good afternoon guys. The gaming you mentioned on the prior settlement for DLC, what line in the P&L is that from, is that may be a credit in G&A now which was it?

Give me one second.

Give us a second there, John.

Okay. I'll just go to my next question then. How much is left in the Cabot impairment reversal bucket?

In the European impairment bucket it's - I'll Jon, refine that as well. It's less than $10 million on the impairment, European impairment, Cabot impairment bucket John.

That's less to be reversed, correct?

Yeah. What's left today is approximately $10 million.

Okay and then -

And I think [indiscernible] reversed, but it is what's left as an allowance that was taken.

Okay and then if you - if I'm not mistaken, you said earlier in the call you divested refinancing, does that mean that - I'm just trying to remember if that's the remaining piece that comes non-controlling interest and that zeros out going forward.

So that was coming through. So the management company, not the portfolios, the management company was coming through non-controlling interest and that would go away. But we do have very small other platforms, for example, in France that also is not 100% owned, so that will still come through non-controlling interest. It's very small.

Okay, that number of be very, very small. And to answer your earlier question, John, it does come through G&A and it was pre-tax and after tax, there was no tax impact to it, $5.5 million.

Alright, that's it for me. Thank you.

Thanks, John.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Dominick Gabriele of Oppenheimer & Company. You may proceed with your question.

Hi, good evening, everybody. Thanks for taking my questions. We just talked about just the Brexit impact just maybe in a slightly different way. Is there higher breakage rate now given the tough environment versus previously and can you just talk about how that breakage rate is changed over time pre-Brexit and now versus your original expectations in your cash collections?

Ken?

Yeah, I can take that. So we've been running at a very low breakage rates for some time now and it's been unaffected by the uncertainty caused over the last couple of years by the prospected Brexit and I think it's probably worth stepping back and just explaining just how stable this portfolio we have. We have over 800,000 customers who are regularly paying quite a small payment, so below GBR25. That breakage rate as in the number of those arrangements that break over a three month period is in the order of 2%. So we have an extremely stable back book. And it is very stable because the way we set those payments is designed to be very affordable and to have a buffer for each and every one of those customers at an individual level based on assessment of their income and expenditure. So if we go into a worsening scenario, and we have had this experience back in the crisis where unemployment jumped in the UK from 4% to 8%, we will monitor exactly what the impact is and respond accordingly. If you look back at 2007, 2008, we saw a very small impact from a doubling of unemployment in the UK because of the fact that those payments have been set at low levels and very affordable levels for a population of customers that are already in their own sort of mini recession. So it doesn't mean we don't anticipate some impact to our overall ERC from the worst case scenario an ideal Brexit. But we think it's going to be very manageable and it's going to be offset by the positives of additional flow into our service business and higher returns from fresh debt sales.

Great, thank you so much. And then just one more, purchases of property and equipment was up a little more than it usually is versus the previous few quarters. Can you just talk about what drove that in the quarter and do you expect this to revert back towards maybe half of the amount that it was in the current quarter for 2019 on a quarterly basis. Thank you so much.

Hi, Dominick. It's spiked up because we were investing in especially a lot of systems that help us with our collections. We're also as you're aware, expanding capacity over time, which meant we had to expand our facilities. So we had a CapEx level and therefore PP&E growth which was higher than we would have expected and so now we're going to revert to not quite perhaps as lower CapEx as we were initially, but after another year or two I guarantee you will get down to a CapEx level which is more like we've experienced in the past. So you've seen the, if you will, but as you know, there's expenditure and then there's depreciation out of it, right, but in terms of the CapEx part of it we peaked.

Great, thanks so much.

Thank you. And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Mr. Masih, for any further remarks.

Thank you. That concludes the call for today. Thanks for taking the time to join us and we look forward to providing our first quarter 2019 results in May. Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a wonderful day.