Good day, and welcome to the Equifax Q4 2010 Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Jeff Dodge. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you and good morning, everybody. Welcome to today's conference call. I'm Jeff Dodge with Investor Relations. And with me today are Rick Smith, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Lee Adrean, our Chief Financial Officer. Today's call is being recorded. An archive of the recording will be available later today in the Investor Relations section in the About Equifax tab of our website at www.equifax.com. During this call, we'll be making certain forward-looking statements to help you understand Equifax and its business environment. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Certain risk factors inherent in our business are set forth in the filings with the SEC, including our 2009 Form 10-K and subsequent filings. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded two onetime items: a restructuring charge and a tax credit, which will be excluded from our discussion this morning. Also, we will refer to a non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to Equifax, which excludes the impact of the onetime items and acquisition-related amortization expense. These items are included in our non-GAAP reconciliation included with our earnings release and posted on our website. Please refer to the non-GAAP reconciliation in our various investor presentations, which are posted in the Investor Relations section under the About Equifax tab on our website for further detail. Now I'd like to turn it over to Rick.

Thanks, Jeff. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us this morning. The focus and execution of this team enabled us to deliver another strong performance in the fourth quarter. We continue to capitalize on our strategic investments. We execute well on our key enterprise initiatives, and we're benefiting from a modestly improving business environment. Although the headwinds may have abated, they have not yet become strong tailwinds for us. So, our focus, going forward, will continue to be on the execution of our strategic filings and delivering on commitments to our customers and our shareholders. A quick review of the quarter. Total revenue from continuing ops was $482 million, up 11% from the fourth quarter of 2009 and ahead of the expectations we gave you during our earnings release last October. I'm going to spend some time talking about this next one, which is operating margin. Operating margin was 23%, which is flat when compared to continuing operations from 2009. Couple of key points you need to know. This is a strong focus area for us as a leadership team. We're committed to the stated goals we have given you over the last couple of years, which is our long-term objectives of getting to 24% to 26% operating margin. that is still well within our reach. If you look at the quarter, it's important you break a few things out. You look at the individual business units. First, commercial, a strong 32.2% of margin. USCIS at 36.3%, up 250 basis points over a year ago; TALX at 24.4%, up 330 basis points year-on-year; PSol, 30.9%, up 280 basis points. The reason we're not getting a lift that maybe some of you have expected is consistent with what we told you in the past. We have made significant investments starting in…

Thanks, Rick, and good morning, everyone. This morning, I will be referring to the financial results from continuing operations presented on a GAAP basis except for the exclusion of the 2009 restructuring charges and the fourth quarter 2009 tax credit, or as otherwise noted in my comments. You should also refer to Q&A and non-GAAP reconciliations attached to our earnings release for additional financial information. In each quarter of 2010, our business unit leaders achieved or exceeded their commitments and executed well. Fourth quarter was no exception as all five of our business units met or exceeded the guidance we gave during our last earnings release. For the details, consolidated revenue of $482 million was up 11% on a reported basis. Excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates, revenue grew 10%. During the quarter, acquisitions added approximately one percentage point of growth. Constant dollar organic growth of 9% was the strongest we've seen in several years. On a non-GAAP basis, operating margin in the fourth quarter was 22.8%, flat when compared to the fourth quarter of 2009, excluding the restructuring charge. Excluding amortization of acquisition intangibles, operating margin for the fourth quarter of 2010 was 27.6%, a great indicator of our strong cash-generating capability. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.50, up 16% from $0.43 in the fourth quarter of 2009. Excluding the impact of acquisition-related intangible amortization, adjusted earnings per share attributable to Equifax was $0.62, up 10% from $0.56 in the fourth quarter of 2009. During the quarter, we repurchased 1.5 million shares of stock for $51 million. As of quarter end, our remaining Board authorization for share repurchase was $105 million. Moving to the individual business units. U.S. Consumer Information Solutions revenue was $191 million, up 12% from the same quarter in 2009…

Thanks, Lee. Just a quick recap and we'll go to some Q&A. In 2011, if you think about this, the year-over-year revenue growth should be relatively consistent each quarter throughout 2011, when compared to 2010. For the first half of the year, we will continue the strategic investments we began in the second half of 2010 that I mentioned before. We expect operating margins to begin the year at levels similar to the second half of 2010 because of those strategic investments. However, we expect that they will improve nicely as we exit 2011. For the first quarter of 2011, assuming the current exchange rates, we expect revenue from continuing operations to be up 6% to 8% from a year-ago quarter. Adjusted EPS from continuing operations is expected to be between $0.56 and $0.59, that is up 6% to 11% from continuing operations versus the first quarter of 2010. Let me refresh everyone's memory. As you know, we sold a few businesses last year. Those businesses sold contribute $0.03 of cash EPS earnings last year that are not continuing in 2011. Therefore, another way to look at it is cash EPS from continuing operations in the first quarter of 2010 was $0.53 a share. And again, we're targeting $0.56 to $0.59 a share this year. We have great confidence in the long-term health and growth of Equifax. Our disciplined execution and strategic investments should enable us to consistently deliver multiyear revenue growth in the 6% to 9% range with another one to three points of growth in adjusted EPS, resulting from operating and financial leverage. Okay, operator, we'd like to now open it up for any questions that they might have.

[Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Carter Malloy with Stephens.

So on the International business, what's the driver of deceleration in growth there from 4Q to 1Q? What specific geographies is that? And then maybe as a follow-up to that, the investment you guys have been making in, I believe, over 100 headcount of new sales in Brazil, is that fully loaded in the model, so can we expect margins to stay or maybe improve on the international front?

Yes, I think, quarter-over-quarter. There's nothing unusual occurring that drives a sequential delta in International. It's more seasonality and nuances than anything. So, Carter, there is no flags of concern there at all. On the investments, we talked about a number of investments. We talked, I think last time, of adding something like 143 to 145-ish to Brazil alone on the front end of the business. We're also investing in other Latin American operations. We're investing in the U.K., as well, significantly, and almost all those investments are, again, sales, marketing and product management. So what I said earlier, Carter, as it relates to margin. That investment start in the fourth quarter of 2010, so you saw that reflect in the margins in the fourth quarter. That will continue through the first quarter and maybe the first month or two of the second quarter, and then we're done with that surge of investment. So the margin outlook I gave you, which is the first half of 2011, should look much like, in aggregate, the back end of 2010 and then improve nicely as we exit 2011.

And can we assume that loading in all those new salespeople we'll see some acceleration in growth in the back half?

Absolutely.

And then also can you talk about the mortgage exposure? You talked about building out more products there. What the mortgage exposure is in the business now and what your assumptions are and your guidance for overall industry activity?

As I think about mortgage, it's an important sector for us. We are uniquely positioned to serve there, unlike anyone else. We have got the employment data, we got the income data, we got the settlement services offering, got the credit file. So it's important to us. And while the mortgage is going to be cyclical. It's obviously, as an industry, is a bit depressed at the current time. It's always going to be an important part of the bank. So it's important to us to continue to innovate and think about how we can help banks in the mortgage sector. Great example is the launching, I think we talked about it, of undisclosed debt monitoring, a really cool product. But all the banks are concerned about, make sure they understand how much debt you have from the time they -- first on [ph] until the time they close and if there's any debt you've actually taken on that's underscored at the time of the initial underwriting. That's just one of many examples of how we're trying to innovate in mortgage. To answer your question specifically, we talked about mortgage being in the teens as a percent of our total revenue, it continues to be in that range. I don't expect it long term. Even though we're innovating and growing at the rate faster than the MBA. I don't expect the mix as a percentage of total to be disproportionate or much different than the mid-teens kind of range because we're going to grow our non-mortgage products, as well.

But I assume in building your guidance that you guys have taken into account the MBA at volumes...

Yes, we don't expect it. But the mortgage refinancing and the mortgage boom we saw in the third quarter has already - it's started to slow. It started slow and then late third quarter, early fourth quarter. We're not expecting a strong mortgage market environment in 2011.

And then on talks from some nice improvement margin there, can you talk about Dann's progress, that business since he's moved over, and where that should ultimately shake out your mind?

I think he's doing a great job. Bill Canfield has been there for like a year as a consultant for him, he's helping him adjust. Dann has brought his passion, his energy, his leadership. And most importantly, he's brought his knowledge of USCIS. He and Rudy are working very, very well together on building new products, making joint calls, moving people around, so we can leverage the strength of both USCIS and the TALX product offering. So it’s making a big difference. We're accelerating new product innovation there. He's taking his analytical mindset, Carter, which is something we really have looked at in the past in taking the analytics that have really helped us in USCIS and the rest of the world and now deploying those rapidly at TALX as well. So he's done a great job.

But on the margin front on TALX, can we assume that he'll hold or maybe even improve the margins we see now?

Yes, absolutely.

And moving forward, we will hear from George Mihalos with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Just on the margin front again, I appreciate your outlook, lower in the first half, stronger in the back half. Will you guys be able to hold margins at least flat for the full year compared to fiscal '10?

Maybe I should clarify something. I didn't say it will be lower. I don't expect the first half of 2011 to be lower than the second half of 2010. I expect it to look very much like that and then exit at a stronger rate in the second half. And to answer your question, yes, I would expect us to get year-on-year margin increase 2011 versus 2010 and continuing that in 2012 and beyond.

Just an update on the pricing front, what you're seeing on the OCIS set?

Nothing unusual. You're seeing a modest price compression on the data. Very, very, modest compression. Actually flat pricing on the online in 2010.

And next, we'll hear from Julio Quinteros with Goldman Sachs.

What I wanted to do is just maybe sort of take apart sort of the consumer credit side versus the mortgage side and understand in your business as you guys think about the growth prospects, what is going to end up being the more important driver? Obviously you've already talked a little bit about the Mortgage business being relatively flat. We can all see the data. But what will it take even on that side to continue to drive growth? And then on the consumer credit side, as you guys think about bank activity, how quickly do you guys think that the banks ramp up in terms of credit issuance or what would be the main driver there to really think about the growth there from those two aspects?

Let me start with the first part of your question, which is mortgage. And I kind of hit it a little bit earlier, Julio. And that is I expect innovation to allow us to drive share gain in mortgage. We have done it with ESS or we have done it with other new products. We have done it with TALX. We have done it with undisclosed debt monitoring. We launched a team, Julio, a growth team with I think it was roughly 9% or 10% of our best and brightest last year. We took them off the their jobs full time for about a month and had them go look at the mortgage market. So what else can we do in the mortgage market to add value and serve our customers in ways we haven't served before? And they came back with some amazing ideas, one of which was the UDM, but many more beyond that. So that innovative thinking about how we can add value in mortgage will enable us to grow mortgage even though the market is going to probably not be cooperative in 2011. On the online piece, the core consumer credit, you look may at it that way, what I expect there is continuing to take our product and our offerings to new verticals and do things we haven't done before. I'm really bullish on, as I mentioned before, this new database. We have a new positive telco and utility data. I expect us to make headways, by the way, in the big banks. We're doing that now at J.P. Morgan Chase, Citi, Bank of America and Wells. We got our new structure launched last year. We talked last year about delving into insurance, that’s great successes there leveraging the Decision 360 and some insurance customers. So a lot of innovation and ways to grow the core consumer credit in ways we haven't before. Specific to the environment of consumer credit, I expect it, again as I said earlier, to modestly improve in 2011 over 2010. We're seeing a slight uptick in our CMS Prescreen business. We're seeing a nice uptick in our portfolio management. We'd like to eventually think that the CMS prescreen uptick leads to more online. Kind of muted right now, but we'd expect that to pick up in 2011.

When you guys talk to the banks, are they at all talking to you guys about possibilities of, especially post Dodd-Frank and Durbin Interchange Rules, how are they thinking about credit as an opportunity to offset some of that potential lost synergy? I'm just curious if you guys have had any discussions along those lines as a thought process for helping them potentially offset some of that lost revenue there?

One, they're cautious but becoming modestly more aggressive in getting back into the market. But still cautious.

And next, we'll hear from Dan Perlin with RBC Capital Markets.

Some clear on the margin profile because I know there's a lot of discussion on it. The area of compression that we expect to see is really going to be in International in the first quarter and then throughout the year, improving in the back half. But all the other segments look like, and from your commentary, sound like, they should continue to expand throughout the year. Is that a true statement?

Well, the one I would say -- I don't have the exact data in front of me, so maybe I'll give you my quick reaction. The general answer is, yes. I expect margin expansion continuing in USCIS; margin expansion continuing in TALX; compression, because they invested, in International, at the first half of the year and accelerating in the second half. But one's that's really I would expect to probably have a little compression, just because it's abnormally high, is PSol. PSol on the fourth quarter, at almost 31%, is high. And that ebbs and flows, as you know, Dan, with marketing expenses. And so there's some cyclicality to that, as well. But generically, yes, USCIS expansion, TALX expansion, a little compression in PSol, a little compression in International.

And on the International side, I heard Lee mention investments, but I also heard him mention mix of revenues. And I just wanted to flesh out the kind of the order of magnitude there from margin compression?

On the international front or in total?

Well, I thought his commentary was in relation to the International segment. He just hit the margin, and then he said something about mix of revenue, which I missed. And then obviously, we've talked a lot about the investments.

Yes, we've commented for several quarters that a portion of the emerging margin pressure in International, they come from online services in several countries being under pressure. And we were offsetting that with newer marketing services, true in the U.K. with pressure on consumer lending there, true in Spain with pressures there, true on specific sectors in Brazil and Chile as well. And we've done a great job of bringing other products to market to offset that, but not with quite as strong a margin structure as online. And we've said that for several quarters. That continues to be an issue. I think right now the greater issue is the investments we're making in reestablishing a higher rate of growth in International. I think the margin, the product mix is leveling out.

I was trying to figure out the order of magnitude. One, you obviously could control, the other one is a bit of a mix. So you're saying the heavy lifting is really in investments. And that's what drove the confidence in the back half?

That's correct.

And then just briefly on the transactions that we saw in online USCIS. I thought I heard you say up 4%. If I heard you right, so that will be the first quarter in a long time that actually turned positive? Was that the right number, first of all?

Yes, that's correct.

And then if we think about in the context of the revenue per transaction in that quarter, it looks like it was down about 3% year-on-year. Someone else asked a question about pricing, but that doesn't seem to jive with that number, so I'm wondering what's the disconnect?

Yes, there are a couple of other revenue sources in the online business that usually move pretty much in line with the rest of online. But periodically it can cause a little bit of distortion if you simply look at transactions versus total online revenue. When we look at it, we break it down into the individual lines and get very precise. If you look purely at the online credit report business, unit revenue was flat year-over-year.

So there's nothing in that mix that we need to be kind of concerned about as a downward trend? Because the previous three quarters you had negative transaction growth, but you had revenue per transaction up in aggregate, I mean with the data that we can see.

I would say on that, the key thing over the -- frankly, a good part of the last two years is if you take that measure, aggregate measure, average unit revenue has been up a number of quarters over the last two years, which has been predominantly a mix-related issue among different customer sets. We expect, going forward, that that mix is not going to be helping us further. In fact, some of the larger lenders who have become a slightly smaller portion of our mix in the last two years is they retrenched the most significantly are more likely to get a little more aggressive. So I think what you'll likely see is a return to the traditional pattern of slight reported average unit revenue declines year-over-year.

But with big volumes coming back, so that should be a high quality pop in the half? [ph]

Dan, the one thing I didn't give you clarity on when you asked me the question on margin, I told you the USCIS should expect margin expansion next year, TALX expansion next year, modest compression of PSol just because of the marketing spend. And one I did not mention was Commercial. Commercial, you should also see nice margin expansion in 2011.

And next, we'll hear from Andrew Jeffrey with SunTrust.

Rick, you had a great year in TALX with strong double-digit revenue growth. And despite a challenging economy, so a testament to share gains. I think I heard you say in the first quarter you're looking for high single-digit growth in what should ostensibly be an improving employment environment. Is that conservatism or law of large numbers or is TALX no longer, in your mind, sort of a double-digit revenue grower? How should we be thinking about that?

Well, Andrew, I don't expect a significantly improving employment environment in the first quarter, to be honest. We expect first quarter, in fact the first half, to look much like the fourth quarter 2010 looked. Secondly, we had a nice one up in the mortgage market in 2010. That's already started to moderate a bit, and I expect that to continue. So I still am very bullish. We got great new products out there, Dann’s doing some great things. So it could be a great growth business for us with expanding margins for as far as I can see.

So an improvement in the employment environment would be upside?

Absolutely.

One of the things I know you talked about, I think you called out $176 million in revenues from your products that you'd launched in '07 and '09. When you think about your 6% to 9% sustainable, organic revenue growth, longer term, is it a couple points to that growth that should be coming from new products every year as you look at recently launched solutions, as well as new initiatives you have in the pipeline? Is that about the right level?

That's a great question. Look at this, when we break out the model and you think about the core economic growth, you think about products and initiatives and then you think about M&A. The core economic growth is probably in the 1% to 3% range, product and initiatives around three points of growth and then M&A 1, 2 points on top of that over time.

You've been acquisitive. It looks like, especially -- it sounds like IXI just had a fantastic quarter, so you're starting to get some traction from recent acquisitions. Where do you think you could fill in the blanks a little bit? Acquisitively, is it more data? And then when you think about the things you could do, is it a one- to two-year lag between making an acquisition, say, of proprietary data and seeing it translate into revenue or is that too long a time gap?

Thank you for the commentary on IXI. We're very pleased with it, not just a great quarter but a great year, culturally, process-wise, leadership-wise, they grew and integrated well into the company, which is great. And the combination of IXI data, the TALX data and the credit data is really making a difference in the marketplace with improvements, so thank you for noticing that. As far as acquisitions go, Andrew, we got a strong balance sheet. I don't depend on acquisitions for our growth. Some neat assets out there we always look at in all parts of the world. Geographical expansion is always interesting. Strengthening our current international footprints is always interesting to us, more data assets. More in the area of IT management is intriguing, so the opportunity for M&A is good for us today. As far as lag or time line from the time we acquire, it really varies, but some of them [ph] we actually buy. My view is you buy a company that’s already got great internal organic [indiscernible] because the synergies you get do take some time before you can actually realize those.

And moving on, we will hear from Michael Meltz with JPMorgan. Michael Meltz - JP Morgan Chase & Co: One follow-up from the last question on TALX. I just want to clarify, I don't think you're actually pointing to a deceleration at TALX. You had rapid reporting in there that helped your 2010, so you only grew say 7%, 8% organic and now you're pointing to high-single digit, is that fair?

Great point. You're right. We grandfathered rapid reporting. I think it was in the third and fourth quarter last year. You're right. Michael Meltz - JP Morgan Chase & Co: And then your CapEx spend ramped. I know you've been talking about spending more on CapEx for four years now. It ramped in '10. Your guidance I'm actually intrigued to see implies a drop in '11. And so just explain to me a little bit is, are you feeling pretty good about where you are platform oriented? And now when you're talking about investments, it's people-oriented or data acquisition, and so you're much closer to having these investments contribute to growth, is that fair? Or how do you think about that?

First, just a quick comparison. The $100 million of CapEx in 2010 included $29 million to buy out the lease on our building, our headquarters building, which was actually announced -- the intention to do that was announced in 2009, but the actual cash payment was in 2010. So we're in the low 70s. And we think the range from the 70s into the 90s is about at an appropriate, sustainable range, which you're right. The bulk of that is new product-oriented. So it's development staff and the software development related to new products, and then secondarily, it's the equipment to accommodate growth and then the new products. And that's a very comfortable range for us. Michael Meltz - JP Morgan Chase & Co: When you're talking about all this go-to-market people in Latin America, is there a specific niche of the market you're targeting? We're seeing robust growth from experience from SMEs, is that what you're targeting here? Or could you give us a little more detail around specific parts of the market that are appealing to Equifax that you're hiring to target?

Let me start at a little higher level, come quickly down to Brazil and the target markets there. So the investments we've made are in the U.K., countries outside of Brazil, in Latin America and in Brazil itself, not just Brazil. But specifically in Brazil, I talked to 140-some-odd people last time. The majority of those or in the SMEs we're also in telcos and the banks, as well. Michael Meltz - JP Morgan Chase & Co: This might be in the [indiscernible] But in efficiency metric, what's a seasoned salesperson for Equifax -- what type of revenue bag should that person be contributing?

Well, we got those metrics, Michael, not [ph] on top of my head, specifically for Brazil. But if you're interested in that, Jeff, reach out to [ph] on that after the call. We have a very detailed plan that we laid out and treated much like you treat CapEx investment, Michael, if you will. Before we decided to make that kind of investment in Brazil, there was a return on investment that we have. So we have some metric price sales Jeff will get you offline.

And let's hear next from Eric Boyer with Wells Fargo.

We saw a great growth in your new product initiative in 2010. Can you give us a sense for the growth you see with those initiatives in 2011 and whether those should have a greater contribution to the revenue growth rate in 2011 compared to 2010?

The answer to your question is, since your question is great growth in 2010 from new products, basically will that continue in 2011? Is that your question?

Yes.

Our targeted contribution over a long period of time from new products to revenue is 10% of our revenue comes from product launched in the last three year. We call that a vitality index. It's a rolling three-year look, Eric, and you may have some ebbs and flows. If you have a particularly large product launch one year, it doesn’t repeat three years down the road. In general terms, our objective clearly is 10% from new products.

Just as far as 2010 compared to 2011, can you just give us a sense if there's any type of [indiscernible] due to the rolling off of the products within that three-year cycle?

No, I think we would expect the comparable contributions as a percent of revenue and a comparable contribution to incremental growth in '11 or '10.

You had divestitures in 2010, are you're mostly complete with those now? I guess asked differently, are there pieces of your business, without getting into specifics, that you feel are core to where Equifax is going?

We continue to look at that as you might guess routinely on our three-year planning process. But at this junction, no, I don't see a need or desire to disclose of any other piece of the portfolio at this time.

Anything that we should think about as far as being different from the normal seasonality of your business for the top line of 2011?

No, I gave you some thinking, that as you think about the year-on-year comparison as far as the growth year-on-year, quarter-to-quarter, it’s going to look fairly similar each quarter. So it's not expected to have a ramp up as it relates to comparative growth versus 2010.

And moving forward, we will hear from Dan Leben with Robert W. Baird. Daniel Leben - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated: With the investments rolling off a little bit in the back half, is this kind of the end of a kind of a four-year significant investment cycle? Or should we expect the new pattern to be another set of investment coming in first half of 2012 and then ramping down in the back half of 2012?

I'll answer it this way. We have the ability, the balance sheet, the wherewithal to make investments as we did make investments for growth. So you’ll always see us making the right investments in CapEx, organic growth and people. However, as it relates to margins, kind of the heart of your question, as I said before, this business model has the ability to deliver incremental margin and deliver the 24% to 26% margin over time. That's the path we’re on. Even if we do decide to make incremental investments in organic growth.

And next, we'll hear from Shlomo Rosenbaum with Stifel, Nicolaus. Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Just a few housekeeping things on some of the corporate costs. Are some of the international costs in the ramp up, are any of that stuff being absorbed on the corporate costs or they're all being allocated to International?

No, the international investments are entirely in the international P&L. Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: So the ramp up, can you walk us through what some of the ramp up on the corporate cost through the year are going to be comprised of?

Are you referring to last year, Shlomo, or for 2011? Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: 2011.

Well, 2011, as I said, we're looking at kind of mid-single-digit percentage growth, which is a slightly more than inflation but less than revenue, and it really is kind of what I would describe as normal business growth at this point. Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And then everyone's asking about the margins. The basic question everyone wants to get to is how long is it going to take for you guys get to the bottom end of that long-term range? Is that something we should think of in a year from now when you get a ramp up in the second half of this year? Or is that something that is kind of an aspirational thing, that it’s one of those three to five year targets that companies put out all the time?

Great question, Shlomo, and very direct. I would like to think as we exit 2011 we're getting very close to that number and clearly at that number in 2012. Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Do you expect 2012 to be in the lower end over there?

Correct. Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And then just last housekeeping thing about free cash flow, how should we think of free cash flow through the year? And are you expecting a much better free cash flow number or you're just kind of looking at some of the ramp up minus the cost of building through the year? How do you think about that, Lee?

A couple things. First, if you look at -- everyone's got different definition of free cash flow. We would typically look at cash from operations, less CapEx, less dividend. And of course we just raised our dividend, that's a different effect. The key thing you might note in 2010 is that cash from operations was down and the prime driver of that - there are two drivers, but the prime one is we made some significant contributions to the pension plan this year. Frankly, because that's a frozen plan, I think of that more as a financing step than an operating step, but we do not expect that to recur in 2011. I think we're very comfortable with how that plan is funded. So I think what you'll see is cash from operations, particularly due to balance sheet changes such as the pension contribution in 2010. Cash from operations should be up nicely. It'll also be up in line with net income. So you'll see stronger cash flow next year than this year, but largely due to balance sheet changes. The pattern within year seasonally, the first quarter is the lowest cash flow quarter just because the timing of certain assets and liabilities. And then the next three quarters tend to be fairly consistent among them. Does that answer your question? Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Yes. Can you just remind us what the pension contribution was for last year?

The total contributions we made in 2010 were $50 million. Shlomo Rosenbaum - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And what do you expect in 2011?

$10 million.

Moving forward, we will hear from Manav Patnaik of Barclays Capital.

Firstly on the marketing side in CFMS, obviously some nice growth. Is that basically a lot of seasonality with benefits and marketing in the fourth quarter? Or was there something more, better than your internal expectations you've seen that could be a leading indicator of better things to come?

I don't think it's seasonality. We had a strong growth in the account management piece of CFMS, which was great. And you saw a pickup in the prescreen as well, but some more of those event any kind of seasonality.

Any takeaways from there though in terms of that continuing to maintain its momentum basically going into the quarters 2011?

The trends are positive, and the hope is that they obviously, the prescreen pick up eventually it will pick up in the online.

One thing I would note, we had I think it was 30% growth in that segment, generally, CFMS in total. Some of that was still affected by the addition of IXI. I think of the traditional Credit Marketing Services as having grown at a double-digit rate in the fourth quarter. What was it, pretty low base? And then very strong growth in IXI, as we've really seen, what we expected when we acquired that business. In total I think that that line of revenue kind of could grow in the very low double digits, respectively, as you truly anniversary-ed IXI now, but you're still seeing a much better environment for a Credit Marketing than we saw a year ago.

On the North America on the commercial side, can you just remind us again of the seasonality in the margins. And also, just sort of your take on what the competitive environment is there?

On the seasonality, there's a piece to that business that is strongly back-end loaded, meaning down in [ph] fourth quarter. And as a result, the revenue tends to be higher in the fourth quarter than the prior three quarter, and as a result incremental margins there, some margins is expanded in the fourth quarter versus the first three. As far as the environment itself, the team is doing a great job, we’re gaining share on commercial going obviously at a faster rate than the market itself. So the growth prospects for commercial are great going forward.

If you can remind us, obviously it looks like a free cash flow guidance or anecdotally what you've said should show improvement, you've already raised the dividend. Just in terms of the way you're looking at in terms of additional share buybacks and obviously there's a level of acquisition investment, can you just remind us your priorities there?

Within our free cash flow, if you take it as I defined, which is cash from operations, less CapEx, less dividends, obviously, free cash flow is after we've already funded organic growth to the fullest extent of the opportunities we have. And that reflects a dividend, that's got a dividend yield just slightly under 2% now. The remaining cash flow is going to go to a mix of acquisition, share buyback, debt reduction, we're very comfortable with where we are. We're a little bit at the lower end of our range on debt leverage. So first, we're going to look at acquisitions, and if we have the right acquisitions that add strategically to what we do and we believe we can get a good return, that's going to be the first priority. And at the current level of leverage, the remainder after acquisition would go to share repurchase.

Our next question will come from Bill Warmington with Raymond James. William Warmington - Raymond James & Associates: You've talked in the past about the need to generate organic revenue growth above 3% to 4% in order to produce operating margin expansion, and given the investment you guys have been and where we are in the cycle, is that still the way you think we should look at that model?

Yes, as I think Rick has stated, we're kind of at -- we have made some important investments in our business right now. I think the direct implication of what he said is we're not going to increase from this level. If anything, we'll come off this level a little bit as we work through some key investments internationally. And with that being said, yes, it's somewhere as we cross over about 4% you'll start seeing some margin expansions. William Warmington - Raymond James & Associates: And then you'd mentioned a couple of emerging revenue opportunities, the National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange plus and the also alternative identification data. When do you think these start to become some notable contributors to revenue? Do you start to see it in 2011 or is it more 2012?

If you're being specific, there are so many things we have going on in innovation and new products, as you know. If your question is specific to the positive telco utility database and IV [ph], the answer is, yes, in 2011.

And next, we'll hear from Nath Otis with KBW. Nathaniel Otis - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc.: Just a quick follow-up on that capital question. One, is there any buyback factored into your 1Q guidance?

Yes. Essentially, no. I mean, it's hard to impact the current quarter with share buybacks and certainly in a quarter where our cash flow was the lowest of the year because of some seasonal balance sheet items. It really couldn't affect the first quarter earnings per share. Our guidance is really based on the progress of the business. Nathaniel Otis - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc.: And then can you give any color, talking about acquisitions, can you give any color on the competition you're seeing out there with those data assets?

The competition? Nathaniel Otis - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc.: Yes, competition now versus a couple of years ago. I mean, there are certainly other players out there with capital as well to spend. It seems to be a little bit of a seller's market maybe, but just any color on who you're going up against? Not necessarily specifically but just the type of market for those data assets?

Well, generically, it is expected in this environment that the private equity firms are obviously flushed with cash and getting back into the market. But where we tend to be more successful is when we are not on an auction process, but we are actually cultivating relationships with people we've known and have worked with and establish net [ph] relationship and partnership in volume, like TALX as an example. IXI is a great example of that. Anakam is a great example of that. Some more international properties [ph] is a good example of that. So generically, PE is expected to be more aggressive going forward. That's kind of our model. Nathaniel Otis - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc.: Any traction or anything on the horizon in kind of a public sector vertical market?

The benefit we get from Anakam, as I mentioned before, is they have a strong -- this is in the U.S. anyways, they have a strong working knowledge of the government sector in the U.S. They've got strong relationships there and a strong revenue stream. So we trying to leverage that in the U.S. We do a fair amount in the public sector in the U.K., as well. That's a good market for us. So the answer is yes. I don't see it as significantly changing our revenue for the product going forward, but we'll leverage Anakam, there’s strength there, and we'll continue to build out products in the U.K.

We'll terminate the call at this point. We’ll be available for the rest of the day to answer any other questions. So thanks everybody for your participation. And with that, we'll end the call.

And that concludes today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.