Good day. And welcome to the Q4 2024 8x8, Inc. Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this call may be recorded. I would like to turn the call over to Kate Patterson. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone. Today's agenda will include a review of our fourth quarter and fiscal 2024 results with Samuel Wilson, our Chief Executive Officer, and Kevin Kraus, our Chief Financial Officer. Following our prepared remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. Before we get started, let me remind you that our discussion today includes forward-looking statements about our future financial performance, including our investments in innovation and our focus on profitability and cash flow as well as statements regarding our business, product, and growth strategies. We caution you not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as they involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to vary materially from forward-looking statements, as described in our risk factors in our reports filed with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements made on this call and in the presentation slides reflect our analysis as of today and we have no plans or obligation to update them. Certain financial measures that will be discussed on this call together with year-over-year comparisons in some cases were not prepared in accordance with US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP. A reconciliation of those non-GAAP measures to the closest comparable GAAP measure is provided in our earnings press release and in our earnings presentation slides, which are available on 8x8 Investor Relations website at investors.8x8.com. With that, I'll turn the call over to our CEO, Sam Wilson.

Good afternoon, everyone. I appreciate you joining us today as we discuss our fourth quarter and our fiscal 2024 results and the strategic initiatives that have defined a year of transformation for 8x8. I'm pleased to report solid fourth quarter in which we delivered results within our guidance range for service and total revenue and once again exceeded our guidance for operating margin. Cash flow from operations for the quarter was also better than anticipated, which resulted in cash flow for the year up 62% from fiscal 2023. This significantly exceeded our expectations for the year. We ended the quarter with about $118 million in cash, restricted cash and investments after repaying the remaining $63 million of 2024 notes. Since Kevin will review the quarter's financial results in detail, I will focus my comments on the progress we've made on our transformation journey. This year has been nothing short of incredible from both a professional and personal perspective. We've strengthened our leadership team, expanded our product portfolio, and continue to build on our strong financial foundation. A year ago, I outlined a strategic framework with six key imperatives aligned with the three pillars of our transformation strategy – innovation, financial strength, and go-to-market. I'm pleased to report that we are executing well against each of these strategic imperatives. They include, one, accelerating innovation in contact center as a service, CCaaS, while maintaining our leadership in cloud telephony. This includes embedding artificial intelligence across our integrated platform. Two, establishing communications platform as a service, CPaaS, leadership in the Asia Pacific region. Three, increasing our focus on small and mid-side enterprises as our target customer segment. Four, improving platform win rates and sales productivity. Five, maintaining an outstanding experience for our customers, allowing them to focus on their own core businesses. And…

Thanks, Sam. And good afternoon, everyone. We delivered solid financial performance again in fiscal Q4. Both total revenue and service revenue were within our guidance ranges, and other revenue came in ahead of the target implied by our service and total revenue guidance. Non-GAAP operating margin exceeded guidance by 1.3 percentage points, and cash flow was above expectations at $12.7 million for the quarter and $79 million for the year. During the quarter, we also achieved the significant milestone of repaying the remaining $63.3 million principal on the 2024 convertible notes. With this payment, we have retired $88.3 million in debt during fiscal 2024 and $115 million over the past six quarters. The press release and trended financial results we posted on the Investor Relations website provide a comprehensive view of our financial performance. So I'm going to take a slightly different approach to my comments this quarter. Instead of going line by line through the quarterly results and then turning to guidance, I would like to take a step back and review our results as well as our forward guidance within the context of our strategy shift. Before I go on, let me remind you that I will be using non-GAAP metrics, except for revenue and cash flow, unless otherwise noted. We really began our transformation in late fiscal 2022 with the acquisition of Fuze. The acquisition immediately increased our capacity for innovation, expanded our customer base, and added more than $100 million to our ARR. This acquisition was immediately accretive to our business performance. Although recent customer attrition has created a near-term headwind to growth in recent quarters, it remains a huge win overall. With our CEO transition in fiscal 2023, we made a conscious decision to swap near-term revenue growth for profitability and cash flow. Cash flow…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Eamon Coughlin with Barclays.

This is Eamon Coughlin on for Ryan MacWilliams. How did CCaaS fiscal 2024 compare to usage in 3Q? How does that pipeline look compared to UCaaS?

You need to help me understand. How did CPaaS or CCaaS usage look in the March quarter?

Yep.

CPaaS was down seasonally in the March quarter. Kevin, I don't think it was particularly more than just kind of seasonal declines that we normally see. Because of the countries we're in, we deal with Ramadan and Chinese New Year, which have a tendency to slow down marketing campaigns and those sorts of things.

Yeah. Up year-over-year, though, 9%. So, yeah, but it was slightly lower than Q3.

I guess how does that compare to CCaaS as well?

Well, contact center business, we've been seeing more growth. It's hard, there's a little bit of a fuzz on that call. Contact center, we've definitely been seeing solid momentum, particularly when we think about the CPaaS partnership around it, the add-on products, those kinds of things. And then UCaaS, it's a tough market out there.

Kevin, just a question on what you had reiterated in the remarks. How did the CPaaS business fair in 4Q and what are the assumptions that you're factoring into the 2025 guide for this business?

CPaaS, so we just mentioned that at the first part of your question, right? So it was seasonally down in Q4 slightly. And in terms of the go-forward view, we see continued improvement in that business throughout each quarter of 2025. And again, with some seasonality impacts in the fourth quarter, which is the first calendar quarter of the year. So we're talking about some decent level of growth rate with some seasonality baked in.

And our next question comes from Michael Funk with Bank of America.

My first one, investors care most about the path to positive growth. And you outlined some of the efforts you're making on the call. But I'm a simple equity analyst, so maybe if you could help me with a waterfall for the piece parts for return to growth by fiscal fourth quarter of this year, understanding Fuze as part of that, CPaaS getting better, CCaaS getting better, but the piece parts would be really helpful for me and investors, so we can picture that return to growth over time.

I'm trying to think of it. Historically, might be a lot of waterfall model. I don't exactly think about the context you're using it in, Michael. And I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying something I think about. The way I think about it right now is our new products, many of which are – we've got some that are now fully GA-ed, some that are in beta, are growing 50 plus percent for two quarters in a row. They'll continue to grow. So at some point, that's positive to the overall performance. Our CPaaS business has turned around. And so, as Kevin mentioned, that was above positive growth on a year-over-year basis. And we're seeing stability in our UC business. And so, we'll get two of the cylinders growing and the remaining cylinders flattish, and then eventually the overall boat will lift. And the other thing we know is, as we sell more products, our retention rates go up. And so that builds over time, too. And so, that kind of all starts to come together towards the second half and the fourth quarter of 2025.

But if you look to say fiscal 4Q 2024 and you have the revenue mix from the different product sets and then the drag from Fuze, if I took that 4Q fiscal 2024 number and then rolled forward to the 4Q fiscal 2025 number and did the same math on the revenue mix and the contribution or less drag from Fuze held from CCaaS – CPaaS, could you build that for me?

Hold on one sec. There's some math involved there.

Yeah, I know I'm putting you in a spot here. I think it's a deep question, right? Because everything flows from the top line down. That obviously influences the profitability, cash flow and that North Star focus that you have. So just trying to better understand how we get there and can get greater confidence in that return to growth. And if it's better left offline or for the follow-up call, see, I don't want to take the entire call here, but…

Let me try to break it up. You're asking – like, would we just say – we're assuming generally, flattish UC, growth in CPaaS, and contact center-related products. And around the contact center, it's really around the new products that are around the contact center. And then, over time, what leads to sustained growth, as we exit 2025, into 2026 and 2027, is that as we become more of a multi-product company, our retention rates go up and our NRR can flip solidly positive to drive that higher retention and selling over time. So the two drivers over the next four quarters are contact center and CPaaS.

Our next question comes from Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley.

Maybe a couple of questions. Just on the Fuze churn, I know as we kind of get further through the Fuze kind of book of business, some of those are very large customers. And so, I just wanted to get a sense of, is some of this volatility just as you work through some of those very large customers and is it – just what are you seeing as you make those transitions? Maybe just a second question, as you have introduced Engage, just is the traction that you're seeing there kind of with the customer type that you were expecting or just kind of any commentary where Engage versus some of the higher XCaaS peers are having more success?

This is Kevin. I'll take the first part of that question. So, yes, look, we are working through the upgrade of the Fuze customers over to the 8x8 platform. And you heard probably on previous calls, we have 100% customer success management dedicated on that base. As we do migrate some of those customers over – and by the way, that's accelerating – we do see some rightsizing of their needs. And so, that's causing us to see some headwinds in that base as we down sell. But the resulting fact of that, though, is that we're keeping those customers happy and the NPS scores are going up and all those things. But, yes, we do go through this process. We do see some headwinds as we do that.

I think part of, Meta, what you're getting to too is what Kevin mentioned, right? So, we've now touched every single Fuze customer. We have a status report on every single Fuze customer on exactly where they stand. We've migrated a whole slug of the small customers. So there's a significant amount of, in terms of customer count, that has now been migrated off. So, part of what you're seeing is that we are getting to the tail end. I won't say that – I'm not going to put a date and time in place, but we see the light at the end of the tunnel, which is we finished migrating all the Fuze customers to 8x8. But we know where every customer stands today and what needs to be done to do those things. Switching gears for a second on Engage. So, Engage is in beta right now. The reception to the product has been, I would say, above what we were expecting. We thought the market might be a little crowded because there's a number of sub-tier products that are overhyped by other vendors. Many of them are very feature light. And so, we thought this would be a little bit more of a noisy market. And it turns out that actually, coming at this from a mobile first perspective and really targeting the right use cases, is resonating. And you asked specifically, is it resonating with our customers and with our prospects? And the answer is yes and yes. We're seeing situations where customers, existing customers, want to upgrade to Engage to roll out. And these are not existing contact center seats, these are maybe existing UC seats where the customer can do a much more, much improved business process, I think is the right word to use. Let me give you an example, just so I make sense. We have healthcare companies that have nurses. Nurses are on X2s, sort of basic UC seats, and we're now seeing a huge push from prospects who want to upgrade those and customers who want to upgrade those to Engage to enable better business processes around on-call emergency services, those kinds of things. With prospects, we're also seeing it because it really fits that unique use case. We're in the middle of a large field and it's UC, it's regular contact center for their contact center people, but they want to engage for all their IT and HR professionals that help out their line business units, those kinds of things. We do view it very much as a separate product. It is not a contact center product. It is not a UC product. It is its own product with its own use cases, but it is very use case specific. I think I answered your question.

And our next question comes from Ryan Koontz with Needham & Company.

I'll try not to ask a complex one, Sam. I know you're a sales guy at heart. So, on the contact center, you've talked a lot about go-to-market changes and some new leadership there. I wonder if you can update us on some of the changes you're seeing on your dashboard, so to speak, on go-to-market that you're enthused about, contact center inflection.

So what gets me excited? So I'm going to change your question just slightly and I'm going to sort of paraphrase it, which is something I hear from investors, right? Sam, you have confidence this shift's turning around. What are your green shoots around contact center and those things? What are you seeing that gives us confidence that you think this thing's turning around and we're going to see growth again, et cetera, et cetera? First off, last quarter, when we did the win-loss analysis, we had the best performance ever in terms of not losing deals because of product. So, right now, we are having a situation where in almost every single RFP, we respond yes to every question. And that's yes we do it, yes we do it with a partner, et cetera, but, yes, it can be done on our platform, integrated and working. And we are seeing that. Number two is we're seeing a significant growth in pipeline. Now, remember, it takes 8 to 12 months to close these deals, and a lot of these products just are coming out of beta now. So that's part of the greenshoots in the future, not to mention the stuff we're already selling. But the growth in pipeline – and then number three is, third party validation, right? Metrigy ranking us number one for customer sentiment, or Gartner Critical Capabilities saying positive things about us. And these third party analysts are coming in, they're doing their due diligence, they're comparing us to other vendors – and there's others, I'm not trying to show any favoritism. But these are all the – And then lastly, look, I spend a lot of time on the road traveling. And it's sitting down with our customers and our partners and me spending a half an hour or an hour going through where we're going as a company and them just nodding their heads and saying, yes, you are on track, you're going to meet our needs, you're doing the right things, just deliver what you say you're going to deliver and we'll be customers or we'll buy more or however you want to think about it. That's really, on the dashboard level, it's the increase in pipeline, the increase in win rates, the better performance on RFPs, the better performance of our new products, those kinds of things, and then just the raw qualitative sentiment you get when you sit down with customers and partners and them saying, yes, this is what we need for our customer base, for our ideal customer profile. That small to medium-sized enterprise that doesn't have a team of a whole bunch of developers, this is perfect. We think we can sell a bunch of this.

Just a quick feedback, follow up on – you talked about new metrics, I think is what I heard in Q1, and loud and clear investors would like to hear about some CCaaS metrics, whether it's revenue, ARR, et cetera. I think that would go a long way.

Our next question comes from William Power with Baird.

This is Yanni Samoilis on for Will Power. I was hoping you could provide an update as to what you're seeing in the macro more broadly. Are you seeing stabilization yet in terms of renewal pressures, impact to seat counts, things of that nature? Are things still getting worse? I guess more importantly, what are you factoring into your guide for fiscal 2025?

I'll let Kevin cover the – so I spent a lot of time – I mentioned earlier on the last question from Ryan, I spent a lot of time on the road. I wouldn't say it's pretty out there. Layoffs were pretty high in February and March. We do see some of the effects of higher interest rates and those kinds of things on various industries and capabilities and those kinds of things. We see the positives and negatives, but I would say the environment is not pretty. It's not great. There's not a lot of tailwinds. There is some holdover post pandemic, right? There were a lot of orders made during the pandemic. Some people are right-sizing those orders. Kevin mentioned it around Fuze, some of the areas we see that. I think it's fair to say every CFO or every IT guy I meet with is looking at the cost structure of their organizations and those kinds of things. I would mention, though, we launched operator connect. And I'd like to say we're number one on the panel because of our name. It's already driven a lot of things. We have a Microsoft Certified Contact Center that goes with Operator Connect, but there are still hundreds of millions of seats of UC, and I think low-cost solutions unlocks this base. And so, the fact that we have low-cost Operator Connect available, I hope, allows us to accelerate the move from on-prem to cloud relative to other things. And so, I'm not exactly fearful of some decline in pricing because I think I'm becoming more and more convinced that's what's necessary. The idea that the entire world is all going to be on $30 per month seats, I think, is just unrealistic, and so we need to meet the customers where they are and try to capture those tens of millions and hundreds of millions of seats that are available. What do you want to say about modeling?

In the deal conversations I've been involved in, and we've said this before on earlier calls, there's some caution out there. I think people are willing to still do the deals, of course, and we're doing them. But I think there's some cautiousness out there, maybe taking a little bit longer to sign the larger deals and so forth. So the cycle might be drawn out a little bit more, more signatories on deals and so forth. So in terms of our guidance, we're basically factoring in the same. I think it's neither pessimistic nor optimistic in the guide, but right now it's been fairly consistent in terms of the attitude out in the marketplace that we see. So we just keep moving forward in our guidance under that assumption.

I wouldn't say we're expecting bounce back on our guidance. Kevin and I are both sort of quasi-pessimistic when it comes to the macroeconomic environment, at least when it comes to forward modeling. That way we try to be always on the safe side.

I appreciate the color on Operator Connect as well. I was wondering if you could provide an update just on the Teams partnership generally, and then trends within that base of users. And then, I guess more specifically, any update on the competitive dynamics and play there with others that are also trying to lock on to that base of users. I guess just any color around that would be great.

When you mean basic users, do you mean Microsoft Teams or do you mean on-prem?

The Teams users, trying to lock on to those.

Team users. So, look, I think we're one of the fewer or only – for sure, we're the only vendor that has Operator Connect, direct routing, and a Microsoft native certified contact center. And we see a significantly higher attach rate of contact center with our Teams deals. Teams is well over 400,000 seats. It continues to grow very rapidly. We love Teams and I think Teams is a much better product than those guys that start with a Z anyway. So more benefit to Microsoft, the better they do, the happier I am. And it's just a better solution for mid and large enterprises that we participate in. So I think Teams is here to stay. I think telephony is going to be a key component of Teams, and we have the most richer offering around that. And I look forward to doing more Teams deals every day. And by the way, we get solid margin doing it also. So, before anybody second guesses it, yes, we get a solid margin for doing it.

Our attach rate to contact center is much higher with Teams deals, so happy about that too.

Our next question comes from George Sutton with Craig-Hallum.

James on for George. Excluding the CPaaS headwinds and Fuze down sales, would you have grown in the quarter? Could you maybe quantify the mix from CPaaS and some of the new products that's assumed in the full year guide?

Did you say the headwinds in CPaaS from Q3 to Q4? Is that what you're referring to?

I thought he said headwinds from Fuze.

I think he said both.

From both, yes.

I think the reality is that basically the sequential impact is fundamentally on the Fuze and headwinds in the CPaaS seasonality. The rest of the business is basically even quarter on quarter.

Yeah, I would say don't hold me directly to the third decimal place, but the general answer I think is, eyeballing it, is yes is the answer to your question.

I think you made a comment about continuing to invest in driving awareness and making some other go-to-market investments. Can you provide some color on what investments you're making there and maybe how you're investing those dollars differently than you may have in the past?

Look, in the past, we invested a little bit more in the middle of the funnel. We're investing more top of the funnel activities now. We've added sales capacity, in particular BDR capacity. And we're being aggressive about going out and telling our story. So I call out the fact that a couple quarters ago we hired Justin Robbins to be our evangelist, and that guy's been logging a lot of miles on the road telling just a fantastic story. We have a really, really good product innovation led story. We're still somewhat known as that stodgy UCaaS company, but once we can get that story out, we have the references, we have the capabilities, we have the case studies. I mentioned them on the call, Sovereign Housing Group or Upland or any of those types of things. And so, it's just a matter of getting people to realize kind of what we've evolved to and we'll see those corresponding business improvements. And we see it already in the pipeline. I think it's a lot about that. And it's a lot less about spending money on Google AdWords and fighting with the lead ags and these two-bit UCAS providers that dive on pricing at every instance. Like that's where I want to get us out of.

Our next question comes from Michael Turrin with Wells Fargo.

This is Ronit Shah filling in for Michael Turrin. A quick question on the AI piece. So where are you seeing the best opportunities in AI use cases among customers? And is there an avenue for monetization here?

Well, let me answer the second part first. The answer is yes, and I would put an F-bomb in front of that. Yes, our intelligent customer assistant is an AI-enabled voice and digital chatbot, and you pay to use it. We sell it on a per-interaction basis, so yes. And we're seeing significant usage increases off of it. And as I mentioned in my script, all the customers are referenceable. So it works and it works really darn well. Where do I see AI? Here's what I'll say. Our customer base is not a bunch of PhDs in data science and computer science. And they want an LLM, large language model, with a rag component and an IDE where they have to put it all together. That's not my customer base. They're not rocket scientists. My customer base wants products that solve their problems. And so, what we've done is we've taken the AI, either through our TPES partnerships or through our in-house shared services and embedded it into products that they can use to solve their problems. And it works, and it works really well. I mentioned, for example, in my script, the VoteIt, right, from the UK team, pushed out this product that allows local governments to offer voter information, polling information, all these kinds of things. All that is AI driven. It's all AI driven. It does in voice and digital, mainly digital, but it's a phenomenal product. The key for me is nobody wants to buy AI. What they want to buy is a solution to a problem they have. And they are more than happy to pay for a solution to a problem they have. They don't want to pay for a bunch of Lego blocks spilled on the floor that they have to put together to do something.

Our next question comes from Catharine Trebnick with Rosenblatt.

Sam, last year, you rolled out your whole ecosystem of partners for AI between – you wanted to really leverage everybody else's LLM and cognitive and conversational AI. Can you kind of update us on where you are in that process and how you feel that will you know eventually drive more opportunity for you.

TPES. So, look, simply put it's working, right? If you look at our partnership with Cognigy and ICA, we've got AI-enabled voice and chat bots that are killing it. The results are well above expectations. Every single customer is ecstatic. We have customers that have gone from signed deal to full deployment within 20 days, and have seen 50%, 60%, 70% deflections on their use cases, and a 10 out of 10 CSAT score. They're ecstatic. And that's really the power of that ecosystem. We have Awaken, which we have double digit number of deals in for agent assist, and we're seeing a lot of traction in the agent assist market. Even take a step back, we have relationships with people like Meta and with Llama 4 and Open.AI and their ChatGPT model, those kinds of things – those are all embedded into the platform itself, right? I'm really happy because I think sometimes Wall Street misses that our customer, our core ICT customer will pay us for integration. They'll pay us for integration because they don't have the capabilities. They're not a United Airlines, they're a Cape Air. They're not Bank America, they're Atlantic Union Bank and those kinds of things. And so, what they'll do is they'll pay us for taking that partnership risk, figuring it out, and delivering them a complete solution, and they pay us really darn well for doing that for them.

Are you seeing an incremental uptick then on the price of that seat versus traditional CPaaS seats? The reason I'm asking is Gartner [indiscernible] huge report out where it showed on an average 3 to 5x lift on if you did conversational AI on top of a base seat price. And are you actually seeing that?

I think the answer is yes, but I think it's a little bit – so I don't know, I haven't seen Gartner's analysis, but I've seen some of the other ones. It's a little bit misleading, I'm not sure what the right word is, because here's what we see, right? Let's say three years ago, we sold 100 seats on the per seat model, and those 100 seats netted us $100. We may only sell 92 seats now, so that's $90 [ph], but we're going to sell three bots, and so the total deal may be $200, but it's spread across 92 seats instead of 100 seats. And so, on a per seat basis, it's a significantly bigger number. If that makes any sense, there's a math here. And I'm not trying to blow you away with math. So the two to three, I think, is a little bit of a – you're reducing the denominator and increasing the numerator. We definitely see, when we sell those bots. and we sell the add-on AI products, total revenue per customer increases significantly. And look, we're selling a few less seats, which is what we expect. I don't think anybody's going to freak out about this. We've always expected that technology will replace human beings on routine work assignments. That's what technology has done for thousands of years and will continue to do for the next thousands of year.

I'm showing no questions at this time. Please proceed with any closing remarks.

Thank you so much, everyone, for joining us today. In conclusion, fiscal 2024 has set the stage for what we are capable of achieving. We began the year with a clear strategic direction and strong financial position. I'm incredibly proud of what we've accomplished and I'm excited about the opportunities ahead. I love the questions that were asked today. It really shows you how people are diving into us and trying to figure out the next step. Thank you once again to everyone for your trust, your partnership, your questions, etc. We're committed to delivering on our promises and driving value for all our stakeholders. I look forward to talking to you on an upcoming call. Thank you.

Thank you for your participation. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.