Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Eldorado Gold Third Quarter 2023 Financial and Operational Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Lynette Gould, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead Ms. Gould.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. I’d like to welcome you to our third quarter 2023 results conference call. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that we will be making forward-looking statements and referring to non-IFRS [Technical Difficulty] and the disclosure on non-IFRS measures in our management’s discussion and analysis as well as the risk factors set out in our annual information form. Joining me on the call today, we have George Burns, President and Chief Executive Officer; Phil Yee, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Joe Dick, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Simon Hille, Senior Vice President, Technical Services and Operations. Our release yesterday details our third quarter 2023 financial and operating results. This should be read in conjunction with our third quarter financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis, both of which are available on our website. They have also both been filed on SEDAR+ and EDGAR. All dollar figures discussed today are U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. We will be speaking to the slides that accompany this webcast. You can download a copy of these slides from our website. After the prepared remarks, we will open the call for Q&A. At this time, we will invite analysts to queue for questions. I will now turn the call over to George.

Thanks, Lynette, and good morning, everyone. Here’s the outline for today’s call. I’ll provide a brief overview of Q3 results and highlights before passing it to Phil to go through the financials, and then Joe and Simon to review our operational performance. Then, we will open the call to questions from our analysts. Turning to slide 4, starting with production. Our performance continued to improve over the quarter with safe production of 121,030 ounces of gold. At Olympias, the mine delivered its best quarter of the year and the trend is positive with significant opportunity to make further improvements beyond where we are today. This is a site that is really seeing innovation and technology making a difference in productivity. In the past few months, we have energized the substation, upgraded ventilation, and added bulk emulsion blasting underground. All of this is converging to create a positive trajectory for the site going forward. In the third quarter at Kisladag with the North Heap Leach pad operational, we are seeing increased tons with 3 cells under leach, which should positively impact gold production in the fourth quarter. The tons placed are record amounts compared to the past 6.5 years and a 19% increase relative to both the first in the second quarters of 2023. At Lamaque, Q3 production increased over both Q1 and Q2. However, it was impacted by slower than expected development in the underground due to suspended shifts in the second quarter owing to the wildfires in the region. As a result, we saw a ripple effect with reduced mining faces available for ore production during the third quarter, which impacted our production relative to ore expectations. This site has consistently met its performance expectations and I anticipate that we’ll maintain the trend throughout the fourth quarter as they…

Thank you, George. Good morning, everyone. Slide 5 provides a summary of our third quarter results. Eldorado reported a net loss attributable to shareholders from continuing operations of $6.6 million or $0.03 loss per share in the third quarter. Directly impacted by the previously disclosed 5% retroactive corporate tax rate increase in Turkiye, effective July 2023. After adjusting for onetime nonrecurring items, adjusted net earnings were $35 million or $0.17 per share for the quarter. These onetime nonrecurring items included a onetime $22.6 million noncash deferred tax expense and a onetime out-of-period current tax expense of $8.2 million, both a result of the retroactive corporate tax rate increase mentioned earlier. In addition, a noncash loss of $15.2 million on foreign exchange translation of deferred tax balances related to the weakening of the lira and the euro and partially offset by a noncash unrealized gain of $6 million on the revaluation of derivative instruments, primarily the gold collars. Free cash flow in the quarter was negative $19.3 million. Excluding capital investment in the Skouries project, free cash flow generation in the quarter was positive $30 million. Cash flow generated by operating activities before changes in working capital totaled $97.5 million compared to the second quarter of 2023 of $82.4 million. Third quarter cash operating costs averaged $698 per ounce sold and all-in sustaining costs averaged $1,177 per ounce sold. Our costs decreased during the quarter as we continued to see lower than expected fuel and electricity prices. This was partially offset by higher royalty expenses as a result of the higher realized gold price during the quarter. All-in sustaining costs per ounce sold in the third quarter were in line with expectations. With stronger gold production expected in the fourth quarter, we expect to see decreasing unit costs and as George…

Thanks, Phil, and good morning. Starting on slide 7. At Skouries, construction activity in Q3 continued to ramp up with overall project progress at 34% and when incorporating all prior work, Skouries progress stands at 65% complete. Mobilization continued for major earthworks for construction haul roads needed to undertake all other major earthworks, and is progressing well with work on several fronts underway. During the quarter, the contractors for the earthworks and pilings for the primary crusher were mobilized and commenced work. General works continued to focus on site preparation, relocation of temporary facilities, recommissioning of the non-contact water reinjection well system, and the haulage of aggregates for construction purposes. The first phase of underground development continues to advance the west decline and lateral development for the test stopes to validate the underground assumptions prior to first production from the underground. Test stope work access will commence at the end of 2024 with expected completion by mid-2025. With year-to-date spending at Skouries at $101.3 million, we expect to ramp up our commitments during the fourth quarter and are comfortable achieving our updated guidance range of $160 million to $170 million. The spending is focused on completing detailed engineering and procurement. As of September 30th, detailed engineering is 56% complete and procurement is 73% complete. We continue to focus on completing key contracts with evaluations ongoing with a view to generating cost and productivity synergies during the process. We expect to complete this process and award the remaining key contracts by the end of 2023, which include the filter plant, including the earthworks, pilings, and foundation to support the filters. Open pit pre-stripping and construction of the ore stockpile, water management ponds, and the integrated extractive waste management facility dam embankment, structural concrete for the primary crusher and associated process facilities, and mechanical, piping, electrical, and instrumentation for the process plant. The project, both cost and schedule, remain on track for commissioning and first production in mid-2025 with commercial production expected at the end of 2025. Turning to slide 8, in the third quarter, we recorded zero lost time injuries. Lost time injury frequency rate for the first nine months of the year was 0.74, a 49% decrease from the same period in 2022. We continue to take proactive steps to improve workplace safety and to ensure a safe working environment for our employees and our contractors. On our operating results, we produced 121,030 ounces of gold in the third quarter with a cash operating cost of $698 per ounce sold, a solid quarter, which positions us to remain on track to meet our guidance. I’ll pass it over to Simon to review the third quarter performance and operations in Turkiye and Canada.

Thanks Joe. Starting in Turkiye on slide 9. At Kisladag, third quarter production was 37,219 ounces and cash operating cost of $622 per ounce sold, which represents a 17% reduction in cash costs and similar production compared to Q3 2022. Production during the third quarter was driven by the successful commissioning of the agglomeration drum that was added to the crushing circuit in the second quarter, and tons placed on the heap leach pad have continued to increase. The larger surface area of the newly commissioned north heap leach pad has enabled the full capacity of the 54 inch stacking equipment to increase tons placed and increase the irrigation flow rates. Production is expected to increase over the course of the fourth quarter as we realize full effectiveness from the upgraded materials handling equipment. In addition, we expect to continue to draw down inventory built up in Q2 as a results of the substantial rainfall that resulted in diluted lead solution. On slide 10, at Efemcukuru, third quarter gold production was 21,142 ounces at cash operating cost of $817 per ounce sold. Gold production throughput and average gold grade at Efemcukuru were in line with plan for the quarter. Development towards the Kokarpinar area is on track and is expected to continue to extend mine life. For 2023, at Efemcukuru, we expect to see a modest increase in Q4 production over the third quarter. Additionally, during the quarter, the Efemcukuru mine was successfully certified ISO 50001 Energy Management Standard. And now, moving to Lamaque on slide 11. Third quarter gold production was 43,821 ounces at cash operating costs of $624 per ounce sold. Production was impacted by slower than expected development in the underground as a result of suspended shifts in the second quarter due to the wildfires in the region, which led to reduced mining faces for ore production in the third quarter. The fourth quarter is expected to be stronger, with development into high grade stopes and continued stable processing rates. Additionally, we remain on track to complete our 2023 infill drilling program, targeting the upper two-thirds of the Ormaque deposit. Our plan is to take a bulk sample and announce Ormaque inaugural reserve during the second half of 2024. I’ll hand the call back to Joe to review the third quarter results at Olympias.

Thanks Simon. Moving to Olympias on slide 12. Third quarter gold production was 18,848 ounces and cash operating costs were $885 per ounce sold. Mined and processed tons were up from prior quarter and at record levels for Olympias. Cash costs improved primarily due to productivity efficiencies resulting from recent transformation initiatives, as well as slightly lower unit costs for certain consumables, including electricity. During Q2 and early Q3, we completed a number of milestones that have resulted in our ability to increase underground development and production from the Flats Zone. These milestones include transitioning to mechanical loading of drilled grounds with a bulk emulsion agent, mechanical completion of a major upgrade to the ventilation system, and completion and energization of the new 150kv substation, station, which enabled the ventilation system start-up. With access into the Flats Zone, we expect to improve not only our gold production, but also our byproduct metal production, which we expect to result in higher byproduct credits and in turn, lower operating costs going forward. Gold production is expected to be steady over the fourth quarter as the productivity initiatives continue to safely deliver increased tonnage and increased byproduct metals, reducing our overall cash costs. I’ll stop there and turn it back to George for closing remarks.

Thanks team. Our operating business delivered a strong quarter generating improved free cash flow excluding capital expenditures on the Skouries project. We also delivered some fantastic improvements in our business. Both Olympias and Kisladag reached major turning point with the completion of key infrastructure investments. Both sites are now beginning to reap the benefits from these investments. At Lamaque, we’re well positioned for the Ormaque deposit and that we’ve got the exploration drift and infill drilling program moving to completion this year that sets us up for the bulk sample collection next year, which then sets us up to have our first reserve on Ormaque late next year. This site has continuously delivered or exceeded expectations, and they’re set up to deliver a strong fourth quarter. At Efemcukuru were also advancing our exploration and infill drilling programs to support mine life extension. At Skouries, we’re just six months past finalization of the project financing and the project is advancing nicely towards the start of commissioning in mid-2025 to deliver commercial production on budget and on schedule by the end of 2025. We are on track to deliver our growth strategy to deliver industry leading returns over the next couple of years. It’s an exciting time to be at Eldorado. Thank you for your time. I will now turn it over to the operator for questions from our analysts.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Cosmos Chiu of CIBC. Please go ahead.

Maybe my first question is on Skouries. I guess some are wondering how a change in CapEx, at least for 2023, doesn’t impact the delivery schedule. I guess my question is, is this just really a shift in timing? On the top end, you’re lowering 2023 CapEx at Skouries by $90 million. I’m sure you’re going through the budgeting process right now, George and Phil. Is that going to show up in 2024?

Cosmos, thanks for the question. Yes, I mean, for Skouries, I’d say a couple of key things I’d point out. Number one, you have to remember that prior to starting the work this year, we had roughly said the project was half built. So the group that went and visited the site could see we have a tremendous amount of infrastructure already on the project site. And then the other high-level thing I’d say is, remember, we just completed project financing in the second quarter. We’re on a steep ramp-up curve. We have a lot of people on site doing construction now, but that’s going to accelerate over the next number of months as we get a few of these major contracts. So yes, the capital spend is down a bit. Some of it’s actually optimization where we’re pushing some cost off without any impact to schedule and some of it is just simply a little bit light on a few of these contracts, none of which is affecting the critical path for the project. So overall, we remain confident that we’ll get this thing into commissioning mid 2025 commercial production by the end of the year. Obviously with a bit lower spend this year, it’s going to be a heavier lift next year. But again, when we look at critical path, we’re not concerned about the schedule or overall capital costs. And Joe, I don’t know if you have a few comments you might want to add to that.

Thanks, George. Hi, Cosmos. Yes. George, I would say that some of that confidence comes from - right from the beginning, flexibility that we built into the construction schedule. So, we remain continuing to project on a single ship, six-day a week construction schedule. So certainly, we have flexibility in how to deploy resources over the remaining project time. And I also say that, kind of concurrent with George’s comments that some of the optimization that we have done in -- while in this early award stage, I think is pretty beneficial to overall project costs. And so, we’re comfortable with that trade-off in time versus money in the near-term here. And as George said, we’re still confident or remain confident on being able to deliver Skouries in 2025.

Perfect. And then George and Joe, as you mentioned, in your press release, you mentioned a few items that contributed to the decrease in CapEx for the year. Part of it is transitioning engineering work to Greece. Would that result in a permanent cost savings or could you give us a bit more detail on what that entails?

Cosmos, this is Joe. Yes. That’s kind of what was being reflected there. As we move the engineering, the offshore engineering from Vancouver to Greece, we see a better cost structure for engineering. But also, there was a bit of time in making that transition, so improved cost. And for a period, as that was transitioning and ramping up a bit slower delivery, but everything is on track now and working well. So pretty pleased with that.

And then going back to Q2, you had mentioned at that time that several contracts were going to get awarded in Q3 likely, it sounds like it didn’t happen, but that’s okay. But you also mentioned that the FS estimate will be updated to the project control budget with some kind of update expected by the end of Q3 or past Q3 now. But again, should we be expecting some kind of update? Should we be looking out for some kind of update? If that’s the case, maybe when?

Cosmos, where we sit today is that we did an update based on completion of award of contracts. And when that work is completed, we’ll update, should we see any type material information that needs to be passed along. So, that’s where we sit today is we’re not updating based on the commitment schedule. And as that completes through the end of the year, we’ll update based on any material changes that we may see. And if not, then I think we’ll hold where we’re at.

Cosmos, let me just add a few comments to that. So, I just want to make it clear, when we said that in Q2, we’re not signaling that we expect anything to come out of that necessarily. It’s just -- it’s an important milestone in the work. It will give us some updated information. So, in the feasibility study, we obviously made assumptions on productivity, numbers of employees required to do each piece of work. And so, once we get a contract negotiated, we’ve got improved information. And so, we’ll digest that. We’re not expecting anything to change, but if it does, that will be a time to bring the market up to speed. And I would remind you again that it was roughly half built when we started. We have the confidence in all that work that was done that was built into the feasibility study, and we’ve done quite a bit of work beginning last year, including putting up the building around the mill facility, the cranes and the work that you saw on-site that we’ve completed this year. So, we’ve got a lot of confidence in our estimate. We have a lot of confidence in the work we’ve done. We don’t have any critical equipment that we have any concern about. The filters was really the last major piece of equipment that we needed to acquire. And the filters essentially are manufactured. So, we’re already working on plans to put those filters together on-site. That risk is essentially eliminated now. So, we remain confident. And again those things we pointed to in Q2 are going to be additional data, additional information. A little later than planned just due to these contracts slipping a little bit, but again, not affecting schedule. And maybe one last comment. On the civil works, we had originally contemplated that as four individual contracts. We took time to digest all the bids that came in, put a lot of work into optimizing that piece of work and in fact that landed with one contractor and we’re seeing synergies out of that work. It’s a contractor we’ve got familiarity with as they’ve done work on the [indiscernible] the last couple of years. So, we’re taking our time to make sure we’ve got the right partner and the optimized execution strategy, and so far things have gone very well for us. So, I wouldn’t be concerned about a little bit of slippage in the spend or getting these contracts. It’s actually so far turned to be positive to take our time and get the best possible contract to ensure the best possible outcome on this project.

Maybe one last question, switching gears a little bit to Olympias. Very good quarter in Q3. And so, I guess going back, there has been a bit of not volatility, but a bit of difference in the quarters. Q1 was good, Q2 was not as good. Q3 now is good once again. Could we expect more stability, going forward, now that you’ve implemented say bulk emulsion, you’ve implemented -- or the ventilation is now in place? Is the current level, what we can continue to expect in terms of production? Costs were fairly good as well, $1,319 an ounce in Q3. Is that a good level of cost or can we expect even better?

Cosmos, maybe I’ll answer it, just some of the high-level implications on Olympias results and Joe can speak to the operational. For Olympias, number one, I would say the infrastructure improvements we’ve put in place are a game changer for us. But some of the volatility on Olympias has to do with external markets. We got hit with that payability issue a year ago. We’ve been clawing some of that back by finding other customers where we avoid the VAT. And even within China now, we avoid VAT at times in that some of the contractors pay for it in order to get that concentrate. So, we’ve got clawed back some of that. Zinc metal price is down quite a bit and that’s had a material impact on the byproduct credit value that we get. And then overall, we were late getting that infrastructure that was completed in Q2. We had planned on getting that up in Q1. So, that had a cascading impact on the quarter. So, I would say at a high-level, some of these external factors just add volatility to Olympias and I think you will see some of that continue. But overall, what we are doing on the ground with the things we have control, we’re much better positioned now. And Joe, you can add anything you want to that.

No, I think you covered it pretty well, George. Cosmos, the only thing that I would add is that as we go into 2020 -- complete 2023 and 2024, we anticipate continued improvement in our underground operations, and we’re running into a point where mine and mill are pretty evenly matched. So, there will be kind of a period going forward where a bit of work will be required in the mill to take advantage of additional production from underground. So, we’ll keep you apprised of that as we move along, but likely to see a bit of melty bottlenecking in 2024.

Our next question comes from Carey MacRury of Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Just wondering about Kisladag, 3.6 million tons is a huge uptick in tons stacked. Obviously the north heap leach pad is open and you’ve got the bigger gear in there. Just wondering how we should think about that rates on a go forward basis?

Go ahead, Simon.

Hi, Carey. Thanks for the question. Yes, I think that rate is what we are planning moving forward. That’s what we’ve been sort of alluding to with the bigger materials handling equipment that we have now available. The only caveat to that would be the summer months are our best stacking and availability months, just due to weather effects. Typically, we do see a small impact from the colder months, which we really factor into our plan for Q1. But beyond that, we expect to be at those type of rates for the majority of the year.

I might just supplement that. If you kind of look backwards over the Kisladag Life. It was a pretty consistent performer with a number of expansions over time. And really what happened beginning of last year, we started agglomerating the ore on the conveyor belts. And that causes some pretty big challenges, particularly last winter, and essentially it was because we were adding essentially cement to the conveyors to do binding of the fines to support the high-pressure grinding roll and that caused plugging and clogging of the transfer points between conveyors. So, I mean our production dropped off as a result of that challenge. And as Simon said, by putting in these larger conveyors and the larger stacking equipment, that impact is not going to hit us going forward, but we will see some seasonal impacts. Whenever we get a lot of rain, or particularly in the winter, it’s tougher to get the same tonnage as you do when you got blue sky and great weather. So, the run rate you saw in Q3, I think, is a good assumption going forward. We’ll obviously be trying to push the open pit and the circuit for more tons. But I’d say, the bigger opportunity and upside is actually in the agglomeration and how fine we crush the ore, how much gold we expose and how effectively we can rinse that gold out of the pressed heap leach pad. That’s going to be our focus going forward. That’s probably our opportunity going forward as well.

And maybe just a follow-up on Kisladag. Obviously, the operation is still working through the rain event from May, June. I’m just wondering how you’re seeing production sort of heading into Q4 here. Are you starting to see an uptick and that sort of that impact wear off?

Yes. We are seeing -- now that we’re sort of beyond the Q2, Q3 sort of challenges, as you’re able to see when we’re out in the field, things are sort of lining up fairly nicely. Irrigation rate and flows are up where we expect them to be, and now we’re working hard to draw down on that inventory created over that period.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Kerry Smith of Haywood Securities. Please go ahead.

Joe, for Skouries, getting the detailed engineering done is pretty critical to keeping the timetable. Is there any risk that transferring that engineering group from Vancouver to Greece is going to cause any kind of delays, or are you pretty confident that that shouldn’t be the case?

We’re pretty confident that should not be the case and we’re working in good cooperation with Fluor in oversight of that engineering. So essentially, we’re still running the engineering schedule in concert with them, but we’re doing it from site rather than afar. So in a lot of ways, it helps us in order to be -- get time zones and other things out of that. And we paid real close attention to critical path engineering and around filters and other things so that we don’t put schedule at risk over engineering. And we’ve had good agreement with all of our vendors on production of vendor drawings and such. So, we’re feeling pretty good about it as a benefit in shortening timelines for turnaround on key information and the like, being with the whole team consolidated in Greece now.

Kerry, I’d say there’s one additional benefit to moving some of this engineering in country early, and that is, you always have to run the filter of taking those engineering drawings and data and localizing it to regulations. And so, by doing that at an earlier phase, we eliminate some duplicate work, it’s a bit more efficient. And we’ve got confidence in the capability of these firms within Greece to be able to do this work. So, I think there’s some net benefits here, and we haven’t really put any risk to the project from that decision.

Are all the long lead items now ordered? I assume they are and some are delivered to site, or what is the status of all the long lead items?

Kerry, this is Joe. So, there are no long lead items remaining on critical path. We’re just cleaning up bulk items for procurement. The last major piece of equipment I did mentioned earlier was the filters. And the filters are packaged and in shipment, and receipts are started for site assembly. But it’ll be -- all of that will be on-site end of ‘24, early ‘25. So, no concerns on schedule and at this -- due to equipment. And all of the work on existing equipment that was installed and reviewed has also been completed. And any kind of requirements for, modifications, other things due to standby time have been accounted for as well. So feeling really good about lead times.

And just maybe one last question on Skouries. Are you seeing any issues in terms of hiring steel trades and labors as you ramp up to the 900 people on-site by the end of the year? And the second part to that is, are the productivities that you’re seeing so far from the contractors at or better than what you’d budgeted?

So, to take the first part of the question, as availability to workforce, there have been no issues to date for contractors managing to mobilize and bring skilled workers on-site, so pleased with that. And as far as productivities on -- there’s not a lot of data points out there, but the work performed last year around the mill building cladding cranes and the rest of it was at expectation or kind of at feasibility levels. And the work ongoing to date has been similar. But I think that remains a watch point for us going forward. But so far, Kerry, we’re pretty pleased with productivities and how they match up with feasibility.

And just on Kisladag, maybe Simon can answer. Are the recoveries through the agglomerated material kind of tracking with what you expected or better or how are they tracking?

So far, we’re still pretty comfortable with the recoveries tracking as planned, when we initiated the HPGR investment. And really, the agglomeration drum is a supplement to that to help us improve our materials handling and permeability on the pads and so far.

And then just one last question, if I could. How are the two electric trucks operating at Lamaque? I know you brought those two pieces of kit in. And what has the experience been?

So we purchased two. That’s correct. We only have received one so far. And right now that one has been used pretty extensively to train and test the workforce while we’re preparing for implementation in the underground activities. So, we expect to see the second EV in the first quarter of 2024. So that’s the sort of plan right now. And so we’ll be rolling the first one into the service through this quarter, and then the second one as it comes onto site in Q1 of 2024.

Kerry, one of the things that I heard last week that was pretty cool, because I haven’t been there to see the truck that just arrived yet. But it’s about two minutes to change the battery, which is, to me, pretty amazing. One of the big issues for us is you got to have an efficient truck where you’re not stopped charging, and so we’ve got spare batteries, but it takes two minutes basically to take a battery off and then get the other battery on to keep the truck moving. So, they’ve come a long ways with making these electric trucks efficient. We can’t wait to get the thing underground and see what it can do for us on productivity. They’re faster. That’s obviously a big win, and the ventilation impacts are pretty enormous for us. We don’t need air to deal with diesel emissions with these trucks. So, it’s going to be awesome, I think.

And I guess, the battery packs have to be changed with equipment, or can it be changed by a mechanic or an electrician? Like, are they heavy?

So there’s an in built battery changing unit, so essentially, part of the design of the truck is to actually have a removal system installed on the truck, so it’s powered, to lift off and drop down and then pick up a secondary battery, all without the need of a third-party to put it together. So, the truck driver can do that without leaving the truck.

That is all the time we have for today. And this concludes the question-and-answer session and today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.