Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the audio conference call that will review Embraer's second quarter 2018 results. Thank you for standing by. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions to participate will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded and Webcasted at ri.embraer.com.br. This conference call includes forward-looking statements or statements about events or circumstances which have not occurred. Embraer has based these forward-looking statements largely on its current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends affecting the business and its future financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including among other things, general economic, political and business conditions in Brazil and in other markets where the Company is present. The words, believe, may, will, estimate, continues, anticipates, intends, expects, and similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Embraer undertakes no obligations to update publicly or revise any forward looking statements because of new information, future events, or other factors. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed on this conference call might not occur. The Company's actual results could differ substantially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements. Participants on today's conference call are Mr. Paulo Cesar de Souza e Silva, President and CEO; Mr. Nelson Salgado, Executive Vice President, Finance and Investor Relations; and Mr. Eduardo Couto, Director of Investor Relations. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Nelson Salgado. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning everyone. We start with our presentation at Slide 4 with corporate highlights. First, Embraer and Boeing announced on July 5 a potential joint venture in Commercial Aviation as well as new opportunities to explore its Defense and Security Business, especially on our new military cargo plane, the KC-390. We are excited about this potential partnership with Boeing and what it could bring to our businesses, not only with gains in Commercial Aviation, but also cost synergies and new sales opportunities for Defense and Executive business. In our second highlight, in mid-July we attended the Farnborough Airshow in London with static display and demo flight of our most recent models, the E190-E2, the KC-390, and the Legacy 500, with a lot of interest from customers. During the quarter, EmbraerX, our new brand for disruptive technology, unveiled its VTOL concept, which is a new vertical take-off and landing vehicle that could be used in urban areas to solve mobility problems. Finally, Embraer was selected once again the most innovative company in Brazil and one of the best places to work. Next slide, Slide 5, we show Commercial Aviation highlights. Embraer delivered 28 commercial jets in the second quarter of 2018, including the initial deliveries of our new Embraer 190-E2. We delivered three 190-E2s to Wideroe from Norway. So far, the aircraft had a great entry into service with 100% completion rate in the first three months, confirming the high level of maturity of the E2 program. As far as new orders activity, we announced 15 E175 jets to American Airlines in May. Combined with three previous orders already placed by American, we had 89 E175 sold so far to them in this new contract. During the Airshow, we also announced several orders that will be detailed in the next slide…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Ronald Epstein with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

I have just one or two questions for you. There were a lot of LOIs announced at the Farnborough Airshow. Can you discuss a little bit about the conversion of those LOIs to firm orders and kind of what timeframe we would expect that?

We expect to finalize these LOIs, Ron, if not in the next quarter or until end of September, so more likely, otherwise definitely until the end of this year.

Okay, great. And then when we look at the sales campaigns going on right now, now that the potential deal with Boeing has been announced, are we starting to see some more things firm up? Because I would imagine some airlines might have been waiting on the sideline to see what was going to happen. I mean I guess it's another way to ask, when we look at the ongoing campaigns, is there more activity that we can expect in the second half of the year, into early next year?

Yes, I think so. I think it’s a combination of factors. We were engaged already in many campaigns. So, what we announced in Farnborough are the ones that were more advanced. The firm of course are the firm ones, but the LOIs still are advanced. I mean, it's an LOI because it's not accounted yet, however the negotiation in these LOIs are already well advanced. So, for the other campaigns, we expect that we can do well, much as well. Going forward with Boeing of course can be a very good, a very good – it's going to be very positive going forward. Of course, we have to conclude the deal with Boeing, so on and so forth, I'm not saying that we will achieve these, but we do expect that we can definitely reach good terms with these airlines throughout the remainder of the year and beginning next year.

And then maybe just one last question and then I'll hand it on. When we look at the deal with Boeing and the timeline that you guys articulated, is there a way to potentially accelerate that in terms of maybe making some of the activities in parallel, like is it possible to start going down the antitrust path to get the government approvals at the same time other things are going on? That way, maybe the deal could close in the first half of 2019 as opposed to second half. Is something like that possible?

Yes, we are analyzing these now. We believe that it could have a possibility, but we are still analyzing this and it is our intent of course to do this in as short as possible, right, in terms of timing going forward. For the approval of the deal itself with the Brazilian government and then with our shareholders, we are targeting beginning of December. But for the antitrust authorities in different countries, so we are seeing how much we can speed up this process in order to anticipate.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Ricardo Alves with Morgan Stanley.

Two questions on my end. First on the Services & Support, I think I missed the number you mentioned in the highlights, but we calculated close to mid-teens margin, EBIT margin. So, it has been a little bit more volatile than what we expected the profitability of Services & Support. So, I was wondering if you could explain a little bit what drove the strong performance this quarter on that division and maybe what we could be looking at for the second half, and maybe if you could give a little bit of color on how much commercial services contributed to that overall Services & Support performance? And then I'll ask my second question afterwards. Thank you.

Okay. The EBIT margin for Services & Support that we mentioned was 16.8%, almost 17%, right. It was a bit higher than we generally expect. So, for the year, we project something around 14%. That is not a very big variation. And the last question, it's around 60% commercial and 40% executive aviation.

Perfect. That's helpful. And then my second question is going back to the cost base revision, just if you could clarify if we should expect any further revisions or if you feel relatively comfortable with what's done this quarter? And also, you mentioned the incident in May, but it would be helpful if you could remind us if there was any other issues related to the KC-390 project that let you guys to do the cost base revision, just to make sure we were not missing anything here, just because the $127 million sounded a little bit higher than what we expected initially, so just a little bit more color on that? Thank you very much.

Okay. Actually the revision that we made in the KC-390 program was due to the incident that we had with prototype #001 and losing the prototype in terms of use of it for the flight test signified that we had to change the program so that it could use aircraft #003 to make the flight test, right. And with that, we had to keep engineer engagement for a bit longer than we expected, not only in ourselves, but in suppliers as well, right. So, the $127 million that you see is the combined result of everything that we see that have to be re-planned so that we can achieve the program targets, as we've just spoken. It's important to note that we already have 96% of the program development completed. So, at the same time that we cannot say that there will not arise any new issue, we don't expect anything new to happen, both because there is not that much left to be done, but also because we did this revision with the best information, the best knowledge that we have.

That's very helpful. Appreciate your time. Thank you.

The next question comes from Peter [indiscernible] with Barclays.

I just wanted to clarify a little bit on your backlog. What portion of that relates to Services & Support? Just want to understand how backlog kind of moved generically.

It's around US$1.5 billion that is related to Services & Support.

Okay. So, since fourth quarter backlog declined from, call it, $18.3 billion to around $16 billion?

The first quarter already had the same amount of services.

Yes, the DAT already had the same amount of services.

Okay. And I wanted to ask a question on Boeing, kind of follow-up what previous caller asked. You talked about the bonds and how you intend to treat the bondholders, but specifically, has Boeing agreed that potential JV would assume the bonds, given the gross [payment] [ph] to the new entity will be in pro forma?

What we envisage is that all bonds that we have, which are actually tied to Commercial Aviation export, they will migrate to the new JV with a similar amount of cash, so that the new JV is started with around zero net debt. So, that's the structure that we are looking at.

If I may add, Nelson, we are still checking the details, right, how we're going to do that. So, we still have a lot of pre-ready steps in terms of approvals and the whole transaction to go first. But as Nelson mentioned, that's the initial idea.

That's great. I think it's a great institution. But my question is, has Boeing agreed to this structure, has Boeing agreed that the bonds will migrate to the entity given the pro forma leverage?

Yes, it has been discussed in this phase and that is the structure that has been agreed, the migration of the bonds, because they are actually tied to Commercial Aviation exports, as I mentioned, so they are part of Commercial Aviation.

Great. Thanks a lot and best of luck, guys.

The next question comes from Victor Mizusaki with Bradesco BBI.

I have two questions. The first one, can you comment what's the current status of the [indiscernible] we have heard that the government could cancel these kind of incentives, so I'd like to know if you can comment about it? And the second one, I mean, in the local [indiscernible] you have seen a lot of pushback from local investors about this deal with Boeing. So, I don't know if you can comment what the Company is doing with regards to these complaints.

Can you please repeat the first question? We did not get that.

So, [indiscernible] or not, because I mean we heard that the tax rebate would be reduced maybe in September, so I don't know if you can comment about it?

No, we are not counting on any of these programs. We have already assumed that the [indiscernible] will be gone. So there is no provision included in our results about those programs. And regarding the second question, I think it's natural that there are questions about this due to a very complex deal, but we do not see that any of the shareholders are being treated differently. So, the supposed partnership doesn't change our current shareholder structure and it does not change any shareholders' rights, including the Brazilian government's rights, that has the special share class with the golden share. We think that this deal will bring operation and marketing gain that will benefit all shareholders equally, without any distinction. So, it's important to make clear that we don't have any change in the equity structure of Embraer or any acquisition of Embraer shares by Boeing. So, the transaction of the partnership is aiming actually to explore our Commercial Aviation assets and liabilities in a more efficient way, given the current aviation assets. We think it's natural that there are some questions regarding its view and we hope that as soon as we are able to make more information available, our shareholders will see that this deal is a very good one. And obviously, it's important to highlight that all the governance of the process is believed to be totally respected and will continue to be. So, the deal has to be approved by the Board of Directors, by the Brazilian government, regulators, and shareholders in the end. So, the proposed partnership does not imply any change of control of Embraer. So, we are very positive that we will be able to show shareholders that this is a very good deal.

Okay. And I mean, do you have any stance in terms of any agreement on the Company-hosted conference call to discuss this transaction that it would be possible to pay a special dividend and also to do a buyback? So, I don't know if you have any update on this front.

We imagine that we will be able to pay special dividends on the dividend when the transaction is concluded. We just cannot affirm right now the exact amount because it depends on many factors that we are detailing and with the carve-out process that is going on right now. But it is our plan to pay a healthy dividend to shareholders.

Okay, thank you.

Our next question comes from Augusto Ensiki with HSBC.

Just a question on the Executive segment, you guys are about 630 or so aircraft so far this year and to hit the bottom end of the guidance you seem to have another like 70 or so aircraft to get there. And we're seeing EBIT margin for the Exec segment improve significantly. Can we then assume that by year end, you're going to be touching the positive EBIT margin and hopefully there is a big improvement in the gross margin this quarter, is this sustainable for year-end, so can we get to mid single digit positive for EBIT?

Yes, positively, we are very confident in the turnaround of our Executive business so that we can sustainably generate positive margins and cash flows. The result from the first quarter was a bit low because of the lower deliveries, but that is a normal seasonality that we have and we will be within our guidance for the year. And we are really very positive. And it's important to point out that we continue to be very disciplined with our prices, so that if we have [indiscernible] in sales to keep our prices, that’s the priority nowadays, and we're very confident that we will deliver consistently mid single digit margins from this year onwards.

Okay. And as far as, so you guys have been stressing price discipline, have you seen that to be the case with your competitors? I mean, are they spending, any of them offering maybe outsized incentives or otherwise?

Sorry, I did not understand. You're talking about Executive?

Just how the competitive landscape is currently for your Executive segment?

The biz jet market is quite competitive. So, as we all know, I don't know exactly what sort of incentive you are talking about. In our side here, in our case here, so what we are seeing is a good recognition for the services that we provide, the after-sales support. As you probably know, we have got for the two years in a row the best service in the segment. And with that, we are seeing our clients giving value for this. So, we have been able through the recognition to get better prices for our products. We have recently delivered the first Phenom 300EV with a new interior. We have the Phenom 100 also with more range being delivered, and of course the Legacy 450, 500. So, all in all, there is a lot of incentives that we are offering to our customer, which are making us with the ability to get better recognition from the market and therefore better prices and more sales.

Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

The next question comes from Augusto Ensiki with HSBC.

Thank you for taking the follow-up. On the Defense side, is there any update in terms of sales campaigns for the KC-390? Is there any detail you can give us on any that you might be I guess getting close to firming up? Thank you.

The campaign for the sale with Portugal is progressing very well, and we hope that we will conclude that within a short period. And I think it's important also to mention the formation of this new JV with Boeing in Defense, which will focus in the short term in the KC-390 sales potential. We believe that this new JV will open up a very important market, which we have not counted on previously because of the geopolitical influence that our competitors would have there. But with the partnership with Boeing and their engagement in selling and marketing the product, we believe that we will gather much more sales in the KC in the mid-term.

Perfect. Thank you again.

The next question comes from Noah Poponak with Goldman Sachs.

This is Matthew on for Noah. In your conference call on the JV with Boeing, you alluded to additional investment in the KC-390 and business jets. Could you help us understand what that entails and provide some sense of the sizing and timing of those investments?

No, we have not a strong definition on that. We just anticipated that with the KC-390 JV, there may be need for some investments, and this is important because this is – and that's different from the type of partnership that we had with Boeing in the past with the KC-390. So, we are seeking about doing other Defenses now that may require some investments. But there is no definition on the amount of debt and no definition of investment in Executive Aviation either, which we in Executive Aviation, we keep focused on our turnaround plan. So, we want to get this business with positive returns and positive cash generation and we will do that before thinking about any other new product development. It's important to note that we go on however updating our products to keep them competitive. So, that we will continue to do.

Got you. So, following up on that, you talk about sort of a potential next generation KC-390, new investments going into that, could you give us a sense of sort of maybe the extent of those potential changes, sort of what markets you're targeting and potential timing for that?

No, that's something that the JV – we are working with Boeing in the business case development. Not necessarily we anticipate that there will be a new version of the KC. There may be differences in part of the industrial strategy, we don't know, but we will do whatever is necessary to unlock market that today we cannot access. But it's not right to assume that this will result in a new version of the KC.

Got it. Thank you. And just thinking about the commercial JV, if there were to be a new aircraft developed there, that sort of would it involve additional capital infusions? Would you look to be contributing additional cash in order to avoid dilution or stick to maintain that cash position at Embraer?

[Indiscernible] So, we want to keep our share back up 20% and going forward. So, that's the idea.

Got it. Thank you.

This concludes today's question-and-answer session and Embraer audio conference for today. Thank you very much for your participation and have a good day.