Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Actuant Corporation Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2012 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded on Thursday, September 27, 2012. It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Karen Bauer, Actuant's Director, Investor Relations and Communications. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to Actuant's Fourth Quarter of Fiscal 2012 Earnings Conference Call. On the call with me today are Bob Arzbaecher, Actuant's Chief Executive Officer; Mark Goldstein, Chief Operating Officer; and Andy Lampereur, Chief Financial Officer. I would like to point out that our earnings release and the slide presentation supplementing today's call are available in the Investor section of our website. Before we start, let me offer the following cautionary note. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and that there are a number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements. These factors are outlined in our SEC filings. For purposes of today's call, all references to financial results exclude the Mastervolt noncash impairment charge. We have provided reconciliations from GAAP to non-GAAP measures in the supplemental schedules attached to this morning's press release that remove the impact of this noncash item. [Operator Instructions] And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bob.

Thank you, Karen, and thanks for joining us on our year-end earnings call. By all measures, it was a solid finish for 2012. We delivered fourth quarter sales and earnings in line with expectations and better-than-expected cash flow despite weakening economic environment. We achieved strong cash flow in 3 of the 4 segments, with Engineered Solutions down, but in line with our expectations. EPS before special items was $0.55 a share, at the top end of our guidance range and 10% higher than the prior year. The fourth quarter comparisons were by far the toughest of 2012 from a foreign currency standpoint. If we had stable FX rates from last year, our fourth quarter EPS would've been in the mid-teens. Last week, we announced the Mastervolt impairment charge of approximately $63 million. We've been clear over the past 2 years that this business's performance has not met our expectations. Solar inverter market demand and profitability has deteriorated, as has the overall economic environment for Europe and -- since we completed the Mastervolt acquisition in 2010. While our solar sales have improved over the last few quarters, long-term profit margins and growth expectations have been reduced since the acquisition, and this impacted the impairment calculation. The impairment charge was noncash in nature and has no impact on sales, margins or liquidity. While clearly disappointing, I believe our organization has learned from this acquisition and continue to believe our 2-pronged growth strategy of acquisitions and core growth has and will continue to add value and create value for shareholders. I'll turn the call over to Andy now and go through some quarterly details, and then I'll come back and answer a few topics after Andy, including guidance. Andy?

Thank you, Bob, and good morning, everyone. Fourth quarter came in pretty much as expected, and I'll provide some additional detail on that from what you read in this morning's press release. Summarizing the results for the fourth quarter at a high level, we generated sales of $405 million, which is right in the middle of our guidance range. Due to strong currency headwinds in the middle of the quarter, sales were up less than 1% from last year's $403 million. Our fourth quarter operating profit margins increased 20 basis points from a year ago to 14.3%, and our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were up 10% year-over-year to $0.55 a share in the fourth quarter. Cash flow was better than expected and put an exclamation point on 2012's full year free cash flow of $196 million, which easily was a new record for Actuant. Now I'll provide more color on our results, starting first with the sales line. Fourth quarter sales were up less than 1% in total on account of a 5% foreign currency headwind from the weaker euro. Our average dollar to euro exchange rate in the quarter was about $1.24 compared to $1.43 a year ago, creating a $15 million sales headwind. Acquisitions added 2% to the year-over-year sales comparison while core sales increased 3%, which was in line with expectations. As expected, we saw moderating demand from the third quarter driven by weaker conditions in Europe and continued softness in emerging markets. North America held up the best in the quarter. From a segment-level perspective, Energy again led the way with 14% core growth, followed by Industrial and Electrical, which each generated 7% core growth. Engineered Solutions, our earliest cycle segment, experienced a 14% year-over-year core sales decline on account of continued weak…

Thank you, Andy. Year end is a good time to review how we did executing our business model. As you can see in this slide, we had very strong performance in 2012, driven by execution of our strategic growth initiatives, capital deployment and continuous improvement actions. Highlights for the year include core sales growth of 5%, a 110 basis point improvement in operating margins, $70 million of capital deployed on acquisitions and $63 million in stock buybacks. Collectively, these actions drove 24% year-over-year EPS improvement and record free cash flow. We did pretty much everything we set out to do plus more, including improving our capital structure. We initiated a stock buyback program to capitalize on a stock price that we believe was dislocated relative to the improved operating results. We bought back 2.7 million shares of Actuant stock during the year at an average price below $24 a share. As the stock rebounded, we took the opportunity to convert our then outstanding convertible bonds into equity, which reduced our debt leverage and created more borrowing capacity. We then used the resulting credit upgrades that we received from the rating agencies to refinance our 10-year notes and reduce interest expense. The result of all these actions: fewer shares outstanding, less debt, less interest expense and extended maturities. In the end, we believed increased shareholder value. Now let's turn to the CrossControl acquisition, the second tuck-in for our Maxima business, which we completed in late July. CrossControl is a display and software business based out of Sweden. It serves the global equipment market, primarily OEMs selling into the Europe and Asia, with a product for the markets of forestry, cargo handling, mining and rail. We believe our existing construction and ag equipment markets are going to be a great opportunity for…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Allison Poliniak from Wells Fargo.

On the Energy and Industrial segments, you cited mix obviously impacting margins this quarter and it has been. How should we be thinking about that as we head into 2013? Does it get less, the same, worse?

Andy, you want to take that one?

Sure. The margins were up for the quarter year-over-year in Industrial, 40 basis points. I would expect to have that same issue next year as we move forward in terms of mix being slightly unfavorable. On a -- that being said, I think we'll still eke out some margin expansion for the full year, but certainly don't expect anything robust year-over-year because of that mix. Margins are great in the base business. There's no issue there. It is purely a mix issue. With regard to the Energy, they were down year-over-year. However, I would point out year-over-year, we had a huge margin quarter in the fourth quarter of last year. It was the best margins, I believe, we had in the last 8 quarters. And the fourth quarter this year was the best we had this year, so certainly not too concerned about it. It will be lumpy as we move along based on mix and whatnot. Again, I expect slight margin expansion in this business going forward in the Energy segment given the incremental volume, but I don't -- I think that the days that we had earlier this year when we were enjoying 100 basis points, 200 basis points of margin expansion, you will not see that clearly in 2013, given tougher comps and lower overall growth.

The only thing I would add to Andy's comment is that the IS, the Integrated Solutions margin in the Industrial segment. This is a high-class problem to have. The fact is, is that business is growing faster than the base business. Its margins have improved over the last year, and it's way over its cost of capital. So while it drags down our very, very good base industrial businesses, it is accretive to just about any kind of metric you want to look at, the -- kind of Actuant-level margins and certainly from a return on invested capital point of view.

Okay. And then on just on that note too, I know Growth + Innovation has long-term benefits coming for it. Is -- has the impact to margins in those segments been meaningful at this point?

Yes. No, it's the right way to look at it. Growth + Innovation, I would say, since we've launched it only 2 years ago, has been a drag to margins, overall Actuant. Now, we paid for some of that growth by the $40 million permanent cost takeout that we took out in the '08, '09 recession. So I wouldn't say the Growth + Innovation initiative has been favorable to margins. It's really focused on, how do we get more core growth? I think the business we're winning is at line average. I don't think there's any deterioration in the types of things we're winning. Mark, anything you'd like to add to that?

No, I think it's the right way to look at it. The -- after 2 years, I think I'd say that the core processes we've put in place are really part of culture of the company right now. It's a little harder to pull out, but it should be exemplified in core growth as we move forward.

You're going to see some great examples of that in the Investor Day next week, and I think it's a great place to really touch in there on that issue.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Robert Barry from UBS.

So just wanted to dig into the outlook a little bit more versus what you provided last quarter. It sounds like, broadly speaking, Engineered Solutions is weaker, Energy perhaps tracking a little bit stronger. Can you talk regionally, Europe and China, if during the quarter, what got weaker, if anything stabilized?

Yes. I think from the guidance we gave a quarter ago, I think you've tapped on it pretty well. I'd say Engineered Solutions is a dot weaker. You certainly -- I don't think that's a surprise to anybody who's reading some of the announcements that are coming out of the large OEMs, vehicular guys, whether that's on-highway or off-highway. We think that, that's somewhat transitionary, that they're setting up for a '13 that's going to be not bad. You got a major change coming in emission standards as you go into '14, which we think will result some kind of pre-buy. So I don't think we're doom and gloom about it. I think we're -- think they're managing their production levels pretty well. But I would say it's a little bit weaker there. I would say Energy is about the same, no real big change. I would say Industrial about the same, with some mix where Europe's a little weaker and U.S. is a little stronger. Andy talked about the fact that, that was negative year-over-year in his prepared remarks. In Asia, really haven't seen China come back. It continues to be bouncing along the bottom. I don't think it's getting tremendously worse, but it's just bouncing along the bottom. So hopefully that answered your geographic outlook there.

Yes, okay. And then just wanted to also dig in a little bit more on the margins, and maybe Andy touched on this a little bit earlier with intra-segment mix. But when I look at the growth you're expecting in Industrial and Energy, those were the much higher-margin segments and much stronger growth outlook, it seemed like there would be somewhat of a margin tailwind from that. And then also, I kind of thought you'd start to see some relief on the raws. So I'm a little surprised at maybe the margin outlook. It sounded like it got a little bit less robust versus 90 days ago.

I would -- I guess I would have 2 comments on that, Rob. First, there's no question, in our last call, I indicated that margins going forward, we would not see the type of expansion in this quarter and going forward that we enjoyed the last 3 quarters. So this is not a surprise. I think some of you are surprised by it. You can go back and take a look at the transcript from the last call. Secondly, the thing that I think you guys are missing is the currency piece. A year ago, in the first quarter, and really in this quarter as well, margin -- excuse me, the euro was worth about [indiscernible]. Today, it's $1.45. Keep in mind that we are buying a fair amount of components and product that's dollar-denominated, coming out of the U.S., coming out of China as well. That has quite an impact from a currency transaction or an unfavorable purchase price variance coming through. That is absolutely weighing on margins right now. The third piece, I would say, is the volumes coming out of Engineered Solutions. Again, you're looking at plants that are not running at capacity because the volumes had come off. We are largely single-plant locations in those, so if the volume isn't there, the absorption is not there, it impacts margins. So those are the factors that are -- I agree, from a mix standpoint, when you look at Energy, if you look at Industrial, those are higher-margin, but you've got those other factors that are weighing against them.

I don't know if we're reading too much into the language. In the last deck, you said 25 to 50 basis points. This time, you just said modest. So I don't know if you really meant, it's kind of the same thing as last time or not, but that was kind of the genesis of my question.

Yes. I don't think in this dynamic economy, we can articulate whether it's going to be 25 or 50 basis points, in that kind of granularity. It's pretty difficult to do.

Our next question is from the line of Charlie Brady from BMO Capital Markets.

Just on the industrial solutions business. What's the -- that's obviously impacting the mix going into fiscal '13. I guess, what's kind of the backlog on that business? And how long does that mix headwind affect '13?

I think it's going to -- that when we look at the growth of the industrial tools business, which is the 80% of Enerpac, if you will, we just expect that will grow next year, but it's not going to grow at the same pace as Integrated Solutions. We expect Integrated Solutions to grow faster than it all year long, so it's not just a matter of what's in backlog right now. It's the full year expectation. The activity is very strong. We feel we've -- we're taking market share there. So that will be with us as we move forward. The difference is not huge. Again, I mean in terms of the growth differentials between the business, it's not one's going to be 1%, and the other's going to be 10% on that, but it does have an impact.

I mean, you guys are losing the focus. This business was up 200 basis points, 27.1% to 29.1% EBITDA. I don't know what you guys expect. We've explained to you a lot of times that the base core business is at record numbers, north of that number, that the IS [ph] business is in the mid-teens and it's getting stronger. We expect the combination of the 2 to continue to be great. But to sit here and look at that as something that was wrong or bad, it's up 200 basis points year-over-year. I don't know how much better you can expect.

No, I wasn't being critical, Bob. I'm just trying [ph] to...

I'm sorry I'm sounding negative, but this is our best asset, and I just refuse to let it get trashed on a margin discussion.

Yes, I didn't think I was trashing the business. It's obviously a great margin business. I'm just trying, for modeling purposes, trying to get a sense of -- if there was a large part of the backlog that was doing the mix in the first half or the second half, if that had an impact, just kind of modeling it out. That's -- it's obviously a great business. I wasn't meaning to try and trash it. Hey, as we switch gears. On the Engineered Solutions segment, in the release, when you break out core sales, acquisition impact and currency impact, I think I'm -- maybe I'm missing. Those numbers don't seem to add up. You've got total sales down 10%, plus 5% from acquisitions, negative 5% from currency. What's the piece I'm missing there?

Yes, Charlie, I can take this off the call. It really has to do with the fact that Weasler has been in for almost all of last year in the fourth quarter, and so the math just gets funky in terms of the denominator we use for core growth in terms of taking out literally all the sales from last year, all the sales from this year and dividing those numbers. So it's a lower denominator coming up with a higher percent. I agree they don't add. You can't add those percentages. But we tried to get the true year-over-year change in the base businesses identified in that 14%.

The next question is from Deane Dray from Citi Research.

I had a question on the Energy business, the visibility. So if you'd just give us a sense of what quote activity has been like, and maybe some commentary about the mix between MRO and project, that would be helpful.

Pretty strong across all the product lines, so I don't see anything that I would even call to mention that would be ahead or behind, one or the other. I think Andy's prepared remarks, Cortland was a little ahead, and that's obviously more of a capital project, exploration-type spending. But MRO was strong both ways. It's not a backlog business, so I don't have any metric to give you on whether that's growing or shrinking. Strong results in really all corners of the globe: refinery, nuclear, power gen, offshore, onshore, just not seeing a lot of things that are trends, sub-trends that are going on.

Great, that's helpful. And how about just some commentary on leverage? I mean, this really jumps out, especially for people who've followed the company for a long time, 1.1x leverage. And is this -- how much is this more of a result of any sort of more conservatism in the balance sheet versus the -- you being more disciplined on price and availability of attractive businesses on the M&A side?

It's a great question, Deane. I think we did get more conservative coming out of the last recession. We lowered our debt leverage ratio from 2x to 3x debt-to-EBITDA down to 1.5x to 2.5x debt-to-EBITDA. So I think we did get conservative, but it was really a couple of -- 3 years ago when we did that. Since that point, I don't think there's really been any change in our complexion. I think Growth + Innovation is obviously something we've added to our quiver of continuous improvement of things. And I think we're funding that aggressively and like what the results are after a couple of years. I don't think it's affected our acquisitions. I don't think we've changed the valuation metrics that we follow. We're still doing the same ROIC, we're still trying to get to that modified CMM return within kind of by the end of the first year, getting into the second year. So I don't really feel like there has been a change. It's just a function of very strong cash flow this year and the converts coming out. And the combination of those 2 put us below the range at 1.1x, below that 1.5x.

I'd like to have more leverage than we do right now, honestly. From an acquisition standpoint, I think it's -- if we're in the same spot a year from now than we're at right now, I think a little bit more of a fair question on it. But bear in mind, we're one quarter removed from the converts coming out. And that -- absent that, we'd be right at 1.5x right now. So certainly no change, no change.

That's great to hear and we characterize this all as a high-quality problem, and just you've got lots of firepower available.

The next question is from Ajay Kejriwal from FBR Capital Markets. Ajay Kejriwal - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: So just following up on that question, Deane's, so you're forecasting a solid $200 million free cash flow next year. And then 2012 fiscal, for you, was the first year where you spent a sizable amount on buybacks. So maybe any thoughts on, how should we be thinking about buybacks versus acquisitions? Is share purchases going to be a more regular part of your use of free cash?

Yes, I don't think there's really been any change from when we put this in a year ago. I think we -- with the cash flow that we have right now, we have the luxury of really funding all the kind of acquisition activity we -- that we normally see. Obviously, a big -- a real big deal might change that. But the normal kind of fairway-type deals of $50 million to $100 million, we can fund the activity we want to fund and still do some buybacks. I don't think we're going to give any more guidance than we've given in the past, which is when we think the stock is dislocated, we're going to buy back shares. And we obviously have that luxury to do when we're leveraged at 1.1x. Ajay Kejriwal - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Yes, it's certainly good to have that luxury on a day like today where the stock appears to be dislocated. But maybe if I can ask a question on the guide. So you took the bottom end of your range -- EPS range for next year up a little bit. So is that just a fine-tuning of the model? Because to me, it sounds like when you look across the segments, you're forecasting ES [ph] a little bit weaker than where you were a couple of months ago. So is it that there are offsets to that weakness that you're seeing now? Or is it just a fine-tuning of the model that's resulting in you taking up the bottom end?

Yes, I'd point to 2 items. The first is the buyback. We bought back roughly 900,000 shares in the quarter. That was not incorporated in our original guidance, so that adds $0.01 or so. The second item is the CrossControl acquisition. That was not in the original guidance. So the 2 of those are the primary things. I would say that the third is probably more of a just general comfort level that the bottom end of that range is, given our forecast, we think, is achievable and our comfort level in that. Not ready to take the top end up. We'll see as we move through the year. That's certainly been our track record. If we do more deals or if the currency benefits us or the economy benefits us, we adjust guidance. And last year, we did it essentially every quarter. So I'd expect no different behavior out of Actuant than in the past.

The next question is from the line of Jeff Hammond from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

So Energy, it sounds pretty broad-based and you feel pretty good about it. What in your mind really derails kind of the momentum there? And I guess if you look within some of the sub-verticals, where do you see potential cracks forming there?

I don't think there's any -- without sounding too arrogant, I don't think there's anything to derail it because it's so broad-based in so many different markets. If you go back to '08, '09, what we saw was that as the rest of the markets crashed, we saw some shut-in of assets by the OEMs, and we actually saw a brief period, 6 months or so, where we actually had a pickup because they were doing maintenance and repair while it was shut in, so when they opened it back up they didn't have any work to do. So if you go back to the last recession, we actually had that thing a little bit countercyclical, where it was kind of climbing in growth rate. And then as the other businesses came back, it fell off. So I think what you would see would be you'd get some visibility of some kind of activity that was going on before shut-ins, and we haven't seen any of that. I don't -- I'm pretty sure there's none of that in today's core growth running rate, but I think it would be something like that, Jeff. I think you'd get a little visibility similar to the last recession.

I think the other comment, I'll just add to that, is remember, this is and can be a lumpy business. And we can have a quarter that is a blowout quarter. The next -- where they pull some work in. The next quarter, they push work out just based on maybe it might be another service company that's doing some work elsewhere on a rig, and that happens on a regular basis. That actually happened a little bit in the fourth quarter, where there was a little bit of a push out into Q1. We saw a little bit of a pull into Q3 actually this year. So it's just something to be aware of and not overreact to a single quarter. But, boy, it feels good right now with Energy. I mean, we just don't see -- we don't see it and are not hearing areas where people are cutting back.

Okay, great. And then just on that North America Enerpac tools business, as we hear from other companies with kind of this industrial MRO in North America and even in some of our Enerpac checks that we did, we were kind of hearing about some of this consternation and sitting on hands and short-cycle stuff getting pushed. That doesn't seem to be showing up in your business. Are you hearing prospectively anything about that? Do you think you're picking up share with some of the new wins? Or maybe just a little more color there.

Yes, I would say what we've heard is pretty well aligned with what you got in your channel check. So I didn't -- I don't think we've heard anything different. I was out with some major distributors and it was along the same lines as what you said. So that -- we do expect the business to moderate. That's part of the guidance that we set for next year. Where we're having a lot of success is in the vertical markets, okay? When I say a vertical market, what I mean is we're looking through distribution and we're looking at specific applications. One you'll hear about next week at the analyst call is a dozer lift for the D11 dozer that Caterpillar has. And we found this business not by working through our normal channels, but by really going right to the end user and seeing how the actual work is done. And then creating an application out of -- starting with standard product, but then creating an application to do the work. And we are finding a lot of success there. Now is that market share? I think it is. But it -- a lot of that business was also coming through distribution. Maybe we had half the contact because we didn't have the rest of the system, somebody else was cobbling it together. But nevertheless, we've seen a lot of success in some of those vertical market strategies. We started with mining. We're starting to look at some of the other verticals. Energy is a vertical we're spending time on and a number of other things. So I'm excited about kind of that new way to look at it. It came right out of the Growth + Innovation tools and things that we do as part of Growth + Innovation, and I'm really excited about where that goes.

The next question is from Jamie Sullivan from RBC Capital Markets.

Sorry if I missed this. Did you mention your expectation for core growth in the first quarter?

We didn't. We said it was going to be at the lower end of that 3% to 5%, so I think I'm just going to stay with that comment.

Okay, all right. And as we kind of look at the full year, Bob, you mentioned the macro a bit softer, pretty consistent with what we're hearing from a lot of other companies. And in your core growth outlook for the year held intact, should we think about that as conservatism in the original outlook that's proven to be a good call, or maybe some other things that we're missing that are maybe helping a little bit to offset some of the caution you mentioned?

Well, I think when you look at 2012, we are about where we expected to be. Actually, I think at the lower end, right? We started at 5% to 8%, and as the year moderated, we kind of brought that in a little and ended at 5%. So we got our 24% earnings improvement from below that number, not at that number. We got it from a lot of other places. So this year, I think we're comfortable with the 3% to 5%. It's what we see. It's based on a bottoms-up review of the businesses. And then we do a tops-down, looking at all the end markets that we serve and outside external data. And I think we did it in the same way we've done prior years. So I think we've taken into account everything we're going to and it's that 3% to 5%.

Okay, great. And then just one last one on any other margin issues. You mentioned the plant consolidation. Anything else that's in the works right now that we should look for?

Yes, we always -- I'd call it quiet restructuring. We don't specifically call it out on the face of the income statement. I mean, this past year, we had, okay, $4 million flowing through the books on that. There will be similar items next year, some plant moves, that sort of thing. Don't want to lay out details at this point. But it's smaller moves that it's right to do. It creates lower cost in some cases on this stuff, but nothing major outside of that range.

But it's all part of our continuous improvement process that we drive through lead and operational excellence, so that's something that the businesses are looking at on a day-by-day basis to help drive efficiency, productivity and cost.

Next question is from Scott Graham from Jefferies. R. Scott Graham - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: A question about the Industrial margin. I'm just kidding. What happened to the auto business? Is that really just a European situation that just maybe was meant to happen? And it looks like it fell off a lot.

Well, it has, but it's fallen off kind of as we expected it to fall off. We had a lift gate program that ended and that was some of the falloff. And then just model change-outs that we've been communicating to you guys. There's a bit of a hole in that in this particular point in time. There are some models coming later and that we've been awarded, and so I think it's kind of normal, Scott. You've been around the story a long time. We've had these in the past where you just get periods where it's weaker or stronger. There hasn't been any market share shift. It's us and Hoiberger [ph] as it's kind of always been. Convertibles, as a percentage of auto, have grown over the kind of 15, 10 years we've been doing this, and it's getting to a point now where it's starting to flatline. It's somewhere around 3% of auto, something like that. It will be interesting to see whether the Asian markets, whether convertibles take off. That is something that some people are predicting. We'll see. We've had a few Asian models go into that market. So I think it's kind of normal for us. It wasn't -- it certainly wasn't a surprise for our year, and it's something we've done before. We've been taking cost actions to try to mitigate the effect of that.

The one additional comment I'll say is we thought '13 -- as we look forward to '13, we thought -- and in the tail end of '12, we thought it would be better than it was because there were -- going into fiscal '12, there were a number of launches that were going to be taking place about this time. What's happened is the OEMs have pushed that out a year or haven't even set a new start date, and that is purely economic-driven right now. They're looking at what's happening in Europe right now, and they're just saying, "Look, I don't want to invest in all these new stuff. We're just going to roll -- use this model one year longer than we had before." So you had embedded that push out and that has influenced the view for the tail end of '12 and into '13. But structurally, I absolutely agree with Bob's comments, where there's no change at all in share or dynamics in the market, I would say. R. Scott Graham - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Okay, very good. Just on the cash flow, the guidance for '13, that's a nice number. And I was just wondering, you had your all-time high free cash flow in 2012. You benefited some from reductions in primary working capital. But as I look at your schedule here on Page 23 of the handout, is there a different bucket where you're going to get to the $200 million from? I mean, in other words, could it be cash taxes or something? So how do you get back to $200 million, having already sourced almost $20 million out of primary working capital last year?

Yes, it's a good question. I think the 2 areas is, I'm not expecting a source of cash again from working capital, as you mentioned. That was just excellent execution by the businesses. Next year, I think our cash taxes will be a little bit less than they are this year. If you noticed in the fourth quarter, in isolation, we had some extra taxes going out because of the convertible bond conversion that happened back in the third quarter, that happened in the fourth quarter on that. That -- it will be coming from there, as well as the increase in earnings. We're looking at a $10 million increase in EBITDA or so range-wise, so that will be the other piece of it. But again, great cash flow forecast. It's an extremely high-class problem to have, and we're -- it's something we push like crazy in here with our ROIC focus.

The next question is the line from Mike Wherley from Janney Capital Markets.

I just had a question about -- I know you guys have talked about your European exposure and sort of why it's not maybe quite as big as what it looks like on first look. And one of the things that you talked about was the large -- the larger projects in the Integrated Solutions business. And I was just wondering if there's any -- have there been any delays or cancellations on any of those bigger projects?

There have not.

And then, I mean, on the other part of it, what about on the Engineered Solutions, as far as the exposure to exports to other markets? Do you still sort of feel that it hasn't shifted any and it's still about half of your auto volumes going out of Europe?

Yes, it's probably less than half as we look at it. That's a very hard number for us to get. But I think our belief is it's less than half. I think the big piece that has been beneficial in Europe is really the Energy segment, which is -- had a pretty strong quarter, double-digits in Europe, and was able to largely offset some of the other places where we had degradation.

Yes. Solar has helped last -- Mastervolt has helped the last 6 months as well. But I mean, to put things in perspective here, Europe in total for us was down 1% this past quarter in terms of revenue, so this was not a train wreck. What you had happening is you had Energy being up double digits. You had Electrical in Europe being up double digits. And you had Engineered Solutions, as you can imagine, with auto and truck being down quite a bit, Enerpac was down in single digits. So overall, this balance, I think, that should be a pretty good -- it should be a pretty good proof that, that 30% -- I think if you look at other companies, they're going to say "Gee, we were down more than that overall." So we think that's a good proof that the exposure is reasonably balanced.

Okay, great. That's very helpful. And then just on the M&A pipeline, or maybe not necessarily the pipeline, but just how you're thinking about Energy and Industrial as sort of the key markets you're focused on. I mean, it's -- they're both pretty broad and I was wondering if you might be willing to give any more color on different parts that you're looking at.

Yes. When you look at Industrial, we're looking at things that improve productivity, improve safety and our niche professional tool or product applications. So that's a mouthful. It's not going to be in high-force hydraulics because we really dominate that market, but it's going to be things that could run alongside of that, potentially sharing distribution. So think about a Grainger catalog, some of the more professional tools you'd see in there. Think about other value-added distribution channels and things that could go through that. That's kind of the stuff we're interested in. When you go to Energy, it's really -- it's within our current strategy. We have the line that we use around here where we say, "How do we get on the pipe earlier and stay on longer?" You know we do the joint integrity. So how do we do things -- using that joint integrity, how do we do things earlier? Gorgon's a great example of us getting on the pipe earlier. We're doing consultancy work, helping that customer before the thing's even assembled, making sure that the joints are within the precision that they want. So good example there. There's more we could do in consultancy to get on the joint earlier. There's more we could do in terms of gaskets or sealing material or looking at the pipe or doing things that determine whether there's been a corrosion inside the pipe or emergency-type pipe repair and sealing. So a lot of different areas there but really all around getting on the pipe earlier, staying on it longer, right in the middle of our joint integrity strategy. So what you see there is one's more of a new platform side. That's Industrial. It will be something running alongside of Enerpac. And the other is going to be something that really ties to exactly what we're already doing in the Energy space.

Our next question is from the line of Ann Duignan from JPMorgan. Damien Fortune - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: This is Damien Fortune on for Ann. Just quickly going back to your engineered services segment, can you tell us what you're hearing from the truck OEMs about their outlook for next year?

Yes, we're mostly -- most of our focus is in Europe because that's where most of our business is. I think the Europeans are going through a period here where they truly do expect a meaningful pre-buy going into '14. That will probably affect our fiscal '14 more than our -- sorry, our calendar '14 more than our fiscal '14. But most of them are expecting a meaningful pre-buy. They are working with their suppliers to make sure that whatever volume comes, that people can keep up with. At the same time, as we talked earlier, they're being very careful in trimming their current inventory. So you've got a kind of a both sides of that equation going on. I think the releases you see out of Volvo, we're very aligned with. I think that's what we're expecting, and that's a big customer of ours and we're pretty much in step with what you're seeing from them publicly. When you go to China, we picked up a brand-new customer in FAW. It's in launch mode right now. It's small, several million dollars, but we think it has the potential to be the same size as our CNHTC business there, and that would be a great upside. And then we have a launch going on in India, also with Volvo. So feeling pretty good with the European truck side. And on the U.S. truck side, again, it's not a cap tailed market. Our product tends to go into the emissions side, and candidly, we're doing more work really on the off-highway equipment side of that, more than the truck. So I don't have much guidance to give you in North America. I don't think it will affect us that much.

I think when you boil it all down and you look at the various truck markets, we're expecting China certainly to be down, Europe to be down first half, possibly a little bit of a benefit second half. North America probably down. It's declining right now, a little bit of a, I would say, probably inventory adjustment, if you will, going on. They're throttling back on it. So for our guidance, full-year truck, weaker first half, maybe a little bit more growth back half of the year.

The next question is from the line of James Kawai from SunTrust.

This is relative to acquisitions. When I look at your free cash flow, $200 million, and potentially the commentary regarding adding some leverage. So if you assume a half turn, you're talking about something well over $300 million of buying power. And I was wondering if you can kind of compare that to or give us some color relative your acquisition pipeline, like how much line of sight you might have to putting those dollars to work, like what portion? Do you have decent line of sight on it now? On the pipeline, it was characterized as quite strong. And how you see that kind of -- that pipeline maturing over the next couple of quarters.

Well, the pipeline is full now, as I said in my prepared remarks. Not a huge amount of change from last quarter, other than things are moving further down the pipe. So the fact that the backlog didn't decline means we're still in the game and things are still for sale, and we're still in the range and there's still actionable items. So I feel good about that part. By definition, what I'm saying there is you should see some activity in the next 6 months. It's always tricky to guess when, but similar to CrossControl last quarter, it comes out the other end of the pipe. I think when you're talking about size and what could we do, we have modeled deals north of $500 million and staying within our fairway of 1.5x to 2.5x debt leverage. When you pile $200 million of free cash flow next year, some margin improvement and what the business brings, meaning what's the EBITDA it brings, it really is that kind of a number without doing anything outside of our fairway. Now I wouldn't want -- I think our target is not to do that in one transaction. There are a couple of that size in the funnel. But our typical transaction would be in the $50 million to $100 million. And if Ted Wozniak could comment on it, he'd say, "I want to do 3 or 4 of those, spread around my risk between some of our end markets, and do that in a year." So we've gotten away from kind of telling you what we think we're going to do in a year. So I don't want to comment on a target range. I think we were pretty confident we will do things next year, and capital will not be the issue.

The next question is from the line of Daniel Holland from Morningstar.

Can you talk a bit about the new role in your leadership team mentioned last week in the press release? I believe it's just heading up the LEAD initiative. Kind of looks like you're giving a little bit more structure to that function and consolidating some other corporate initiatives going on. I'm just curious what you see for the role. And kind of what are some of the first priorities for Mr. Thomas?

Yes, I can address that. We've had the LEAD office since 2007, and we're really focused primarily on operational excellence and really looking at moving that into business process, and then more recently, in the last 2 years, adding Growth + Innovation to that. And as we added Growth + Innovation to that, it was evident that we needed to put both operational excellence and Growth + Innovation under one umbrella, which is our LEAD continuous improvement process. And so with that, we moved John Thomas, who is leading our Cortland business and had exemplified being able to link Growth + Innovation with operational excellence, into this role to help us really get it to the next level and more closely match operational excellent -- excellence opportunities on quality, service and delivery into Growth + Innovation. And so that's what John's primary focus is as he moves this process forward for us.

The last question is from the line of Rob McCarthy from Baird. Mircea Dobre - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: This is Mig Dobre for Rob McCarthy. I guess my first question goes back to the Energy segment, a little clarification on the margins. In the press release, you mentioned some unfavorable mix impacting the quarter, and I'm wondering if you could provide a little more color there. And also, just kind of given the current quoting opportunities that you see out there, is there a potential for mix shift going forward that could impact margins? How should we think about margins going forward?

Yes. Within the quarter, we had a little bit more growth coming. As we had the last couple of quarters, we've had a little bit more growth coming out of the Cortland business than the Hydratight business, a couple of hundred basis points differential. Cortland runs roughly 500 basis points or so lower margins than Hydratight. They're both above our overall EBITDA margin for Actuant. So you have that little bit of mix going on. The second piece, I would say, is within Hydratight itself. We had -- there are certain product lines in there that carry bigger margins than others. There's the labor. Generally, the service work is a little bit lower margins if you have a heavy month of that or a heavy quarter of that, which we did. We had a lot of service work going on with some of the nuclear projects in North America in particular. So it's those types of things. As we move forward into '13, I expect margins to continue to do well in this business as we get volume. Again, Cortland, I'm expecting a little bit more growth out of Cortland next year than Hydratight, so you're still going to have a little bit of pressure from a mix standpoint there. But despite that, still expect expansion as we inch forward. So there is room to go in Energy. We're happy that we delivered overall margin expansion for the full year in each of the last 2 years, and we would expect that, that will continue as we go forward. Mircea Dobre - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: That's very helpful. And my last question is talking a little bit about the ag vertical. If I recall your comments, you're expecting slight declines in the first half due to the drought but a resumption of growth in the back half. And I'm wondering, is it that you were sort of seeing some inventory liquidation? Or is it you're expecting some sort of acceleration, real acceleration in the market in the second half of the year?

No, the drought impact is really the aftermarket piece of this business. So Weasler's got about 40% of its sales going to the aftermarket. This would be somebody like farm and fleet or tractor supply. And what happens is during a drought, obviously, you're not cutting as much hay, you're not processing as much stuff. The shaft doesn't get beat up in its normal course like it does and we see less replacement volumes. So it snaps immediately back once the drought is over and once things happen. Farm economics are terrific. It's not a dollar issue. It's just they don't need to replace it because it didn't get beat up.

And there are no further questions at this time. I'll turn it back to you for your closing remarks.

Great. Well, thanks for joining our call today. Just a couple of notes from a calendar standpoint. Our first quarter call will be held on December 19. And coming up next week on Tuesday is our Annual Investor Day in New York City. So if you have not registered or need information on that, please give me a call today or send me an e-mail. I'll be happy to give you information. And we will be around all day to take any follow-up questions you have. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your lines.