Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Enerpac Tool Group's Third Quarter Fiscal 2025 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded June 27, 2025. It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Travis Williams, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Mr. Williams.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Enerpac Tool Group's Third Quarter Fiscal 2025 Earnings Call. On the call today to present the company's results are Paul Sternlieb, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Darren Kozik, Chief Financial Officer. The slides referenced on today's call are available on the Investor Relations section of the company's website which you can download or follow along. A recording of today's call will also be made available on our website. Today's call will reference non-GAAP measures. You can find a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures in the press release issued yesterday. Our comments will also include forward-looking statements that are subject to business risks that could cause actual results to be materially different. Those risks include matters noted in our latest SEC filings. Now I'll turn it over to Paul.

Thanks, Travis. Good morning, and welcome from our new headquarters at the Enerpac Center in Downtown Milwaukee. We were pleased with our performance in the quarter. Two of our 3 geographic regions, along with the Cortland Biomedical business posted strong growth, including the acquired DTA business, total year-over-year revenue growth was 6%. While this represented record third quarter revenue since the relaunch of Enerpac Tool Group in 2019, we are taking a cautious posture entering the fourth quarter given the increasing level of economic and geopolitical uncertainty. Nonetheless, we believe Enerpac can continue to outperform its industrial peers in what remains a very soft sector. In a moment, I will talk more about the actions we are taking to advance our innovation strategy and provide an update on DTA. But first, Darren will provide more detail on the quarter, our fiscal 2025 guidance and the impact in our response to tariffs.

Thanks, Paul. As seen on Slide 3, Enerpac's revenue increased 6% on a reported basis to $159 million in the third quarter of 2025. On an organic basis, adjusting for foreign exchange and the acquisition of DTA, we grew 2%. At our IT&S business, revenue increased 1.5% organically year-over-year. Both our product and service business grew this quarter with 1% growth in product sales and 3% growth in services. We continue to implement Enerpac Commercial Excellence, or ECX, across our portfolio. We believe this will add rigor and discipline to our sales process and funnel management, which we believe will contribute to our above-market growth. Cortland Biomedical reported in our Other segment posted growth of 19% with good performance of existing products and market reception to new product launches, in particular, we enjoyed strength in sales to customers in diagnostics, bioprocessing and robotic surgery. Cortland continues to partner with customers to develop innovative solutions with several quotes and prototype orders in the works from existing and new customers. Turning to Slide 4, which shows our growth by geography. We delivered another strong quarter in the Americas with high single-digit organic growth. The growth was driven by demand for our standard products and services. While there has been a bit of softness in the rail and general industrial manufacturing sectors, we've seen particular strength in aerospace, infrastructure and service for the nuclear industry. We believe these industries align with Enerpac's product portfolio and service offerings. In the APAC region, we continue to generate solid performance as it enjoyed mid-single-digit growth in the third quarter. A particular strength in the quarter was our heavy lifting technology for HLC business. From a vertical market perspective, we are benefiting from major rail projects and maintenance needs in Thailand, Japan and the Philippines. We also…

Thanks, Darren. Over the past couple of years, we have talked about a series of Enerpac's differentiated new products and the strong reception in the marketplace. We are proud of our revamped innovation process, one based on listening to and working hand-in-hand with customers to build solutions that address their challenges, help solve their problems and fulfill their unmet needs. With the company's relocation to the Enerpac Center, we have invested in our new innovation lab, dedicating a significant portion of the new facility to take our innovation and R&D capabilities to the next level. And as shown on Slide 9, we have added a variety of new equipment and technologies, including 3D printers, CNC mills, CNC lays and cutting and machining capabilities. enabling our team to innovate even faster than before with far less reliance on outside vendors. In fact, what used to take a month or more can now be accomplished in as quickly as 1 week or even 1 day. We believe this provides a further competitive advantage for Enerpac. Let me also mention the heavy lifting technology we gained with the acquisition of DTA in September of 2024. As we have said, DTA adds a highly complementary horizontal movement capability to our existing vertical heavy lifting technology. Deliveries from DTA have been slower to ramp than expected as we continue to help DTA improve their operational capabilities to work through an expanded order book. We remain confident that this is where Enerpac's efficient manufacturing and supply chain expertise will add value. And on a commercial basis, we are excited by DTA's performance to date. Orders are robust and backlog is expanding as we successfully implement our strategy to cross-sell DTA solutions across the existing Enerpac base and expand sales beyond its traditional stronghold in Europe. As I said at the top of the call, we have moved and are settling into our new downtown Milwaukee headquarters. It is clear already that the move is achieving our goal of creating a more vibrant environment and collaborative culture one that inspires our teams to advance customer-driven innovation, achieve continuous improvement and execute our growth strategy. With that, we'd be happy to take questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Daniel Moore with CJS Securities.

Paul, Darren, this is Will on for Dan. Could you add some more color to what you're hearing from your customers in real time? And how are they managing or reacting to tariffs and macro uncertainty? Are they putting projects on hold? Have you seen an uptick in order cancellations?

Well, yes, I'd say -- I mean, obviously, it's a very dynamic environment. I think it definitely varies depending on the customer and the end market. We've not seen any meaningful movement in terms of project cancellations from our perspective. I think we do have customers certainly that are being cautious or evaluating if and when they're going to make large capital investment decisions just in light of the uncertain environment that we're in. But I think the positive side there is that companies do need to invest for capacity and growth. I think, again, some may be waiting just to see how things shake out in the current environment and the tariff situation but the underlying needs are there. So again, I think it varies depending on the end market, but we've not seen any meaningful signs of any sort of project cancellations from that perspective. And then from a pricing standpoint, I think Darren referenced in the remarks earlier. I mean we have taken some pricing actions from our end at least offset the inflationary aspect we saw from some of the recent tariff moves. And I think, by and large, at least through the channel, we've seen some good indication that channel partners seem to be passing that along to their customers, and that's generally our understanding.

Super helpful. And did you see any revenue being pulled forward at all in Q3 in anticipation of tariffs? And what are your thoughts on inventory in the channel today?

Yes. I wouldn't say anything extremely meaningful. There probably was a little bit of buy-in. We obviously give some advanced notice, of course, to our customers on some of the pricing actions that we took in the quarter. But I wouldn't say that there was anything hugely significant from our perspective that we could see at this point in time.

And then just one more. Could you provide any more additional detail regarding the restructuring actions during the quarter? And what is the anticipated cost savings?

Sure. From a restructuring perspective, we've been keeping a close eye on expense levels and to level set everyone. This is not a programmatic activity like Ascend or anything of that nature. We just looked at the global uncertainty geopolitical risk and decided it was time to take some of those cost actions. Now we do believe we've got automation and process standardization underneath, which is going to help us scale at the back end of these actions. So that was the landscape for the cost piece. Now to remind everyone, 3/4 of that was severance for people. About 1/4 of that was a noncash lease impairment charge associated with our move to Downtown Milwaukee. So we think this sets a good foundation for the future.

Our next question comes from the line of Tom Hayes with ROTH Capital Partners.

Darren, maybe one more question on the pricing actions you guys took. Were those implemented in the quarter? And then do you see the positive impact or those pricing actions going into effect in the quarter?

We took one in March and one in May. So some of those started to tinkle in throughout the quarter, but the real impact will be in the upcoming quarter in the fourth quarter we're in now.

Okay. And then Paul, on the North American performance, up high single digits. I might have missed it a little bit. I think you called out aerospace and one other segment kind of helped drive that actions.

Yes. I mean we did see, I think, good performance, Tom, in those sectors. Obviously, as you know, we have pretty diversified end markets that we ultimately serve either directly or through our channel. We do think that's one of the kind of competitive advantages of Enerpac is that we do have a very diverse set of customers and end markets. So in my view, we're not overly reliant on any single end market and one may be up, one maybe down, et cetera. But that's what we saw in the quarter. And obviously, we'll continue to monitor. Clearly, it's a very dynamic environment.

Okay. I guess one more along those same lines, and I think it's buried in the one big beautiful bill. I'm just wondering your thoughts on your wind business. It seems that the -- a lot of the renewable energy credits are maybe on the chopping block. Just any feedback you're getting from your wind customers as far as the outlook for that market?

Yes. I mean we still look fairly, I would say, positively at the wind market. We did say -- or I think Darren said in the remarks in the EMEA region that we did see some benefit actually in the quarter from ongoing wind projects, particularly in the EMEA region. So we still see fairly good demand profiles there. Certainly, I would say it is and has historically been stronger in Europe than in the U.S. That said, I think we still see opportunities here in the U.S. market, some of the recent changes from administration here, I think, are more favorable than we initially expected. So we continue to put focus and resource behind that as appropriate. And we haven't changed our overall strategy. But at the same time, as you know, we have a focus on several kind of core vertical markets, including infrastructure, and we continue to see that play out well in terms of the investment levels that are going into that sector as well as rail where we continue to innovate for our customers, including some of the new products that we talked about this quarter. So we continue to apply focus in those other markets as well.

Okay. I appreciate the color. Maybe just lastly, with the current tariff environment and maybe kind of a more sluggish industrial environment, have you seen any change in the appetite for M&A? Obviously, know it takes 2 to get a transaction done, but just any change in the environment for that? I appreciate it.

Yes. I would say -- I mean, broadly speaking from our perspective, the answer is no. We remain focused and committed to M&A as part of our overall growth strategy. As we've talked about multiple times, we continue to be very active on that front in terms of managing and proactively moving forward opportunities in our M&A funnel. I think from the end market perspective, we do see interest and appetite from potential sellers to engage in discussions. And so I'd say from that standpoint, really nothing has changed. Certainly, our focus on remaining highly disciplined, however, that as well has not changed. So anything that we do has to be extremely rigorous in terms of meeting both strategic and financial hurdle rates. And I would say, we're certainly not afraid to walk away from things that don't meet those criteria or where the value expectation -- valuation expectations are simply unreasonable. So -- but we can continue to remain very active on that front.

Our next question comes from the line of Ross Sparenblek with William Blair.

This is Sam Karlov on for Ross. So you provided a gross annualized tariff impact of $18 million, but is there any way to frame what the net impact of tariffs is expected to be in the fourth quarter and fiscal 2026?

I think when we look at the tariffs, obviously, you saw we laid out where the $50 million comes. I think from our goal for Enerpac is to really remain price cost neutral. So that's kind of the premise that we've had throughout this as the tariffs go up and down even in the second wave of tariffs that did come in, we purposely launched a surcharge, so we could kind of flex and be nimble with the market. But our goal remains to be price/cost central.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just a couple on DTA. It looks like DTA sales were better than expected in the quarter, but still trending below the EUR 20 million guidance. Has your expectation for the EUR 20 million guidance changed?

Yes. Here's what I would say, Sam. I think the integration of DTA is continuing to go quite well. We're pleased with the progress we've made and certainly pleased -- continue to be pleased with the underlying investment thesis and the progress on the acquisition. I do think that the business will likely come in a bit shy of our original revenue guidance for the year. But that said, revenue has increased on a sequential basis, particularly as Enerpac's operational discipline and our supply chain expertise is helping them improve their throughput in their facility in Spain. So we're continuing to see good progress there. I'd say probably more importantly, particularly on a commercial basis. Orders at DTA are extremely strong, and we're seeing that play out in terms of the very successful cross-selling of their horizontal movement technology to our Enerpac existing distributor and customer base. And so for the year, I would say orders are tracking to more than EUR 20 million.

Got it. That's helpful. And then kind of a follow-up to that. how do tariffs impact -- U.S. tariffs on Europe impact DTA's cross-selling ability into the U.S.?

I mean, certainly, they will be subject to tariffs because currently, the equipment and the vehicles are produced in Spain. That said, we do see plenty of appetite from customers and opportunities here in the U.S. market. By the way, our HLT products are made in Europe and the Netherlands as well. Those are subject to the U.S. tariffs, but we've not seen, I would say, any diminishing demand profile from U.S. customers for that equipment. So I think we continue to be -- have a fairly optimistic outlook both for -- and for DTA here in the U.S. market. .

And our final question comes from the line of Steve Silver with Argus Research.

I was hoping you guys could put some context around the pipeline size and the scalability for the new in-house innovation lab and maybe just some thoughts around previous new products, whether most of those were using outsourced vendors compared to your previous in-house capabilities and maybe the thoughts on the potential impact on overall R&D costs given the high number of SKUs in the portfolio.

Yes. Steve, thanks for the question. Look, I think historically, it was really a mix. Certainly, we had some in-house capabilities for prototyping previously before moving to our new headquarters in this innovation lab that we set up here, but we did utilize a lot of external vendors and services. And to some degree, that will still be required, of course, especially for specialty type services. But we're certainly pretty excited about the investment we've made in this innovation lab. And while I think there will be ultimately some cost advantages. And of course, in the slides, we highlighted a case study example of that. I think my view is that the much more significant benefit will be the time improvement that we make in terms of bringing new products to market. We're able to dramatically reduce the time that it takes to prototype components and parts, literally from weeks to days or days to hours, as we talked about in this case study through the capital investments that we made in the facility here. So I do expect that, that will help increase the overall pace of our innovation and how quickly we can bring things to market. I know our team is extremely excited about that, and they've already gotten to work, as you can see in utilizing these new tools and capabilities that we've added to our innovation labs. So I think from our perspective, it was a great investment. I think it will ultimately have a really strong return, both from a measurable dollars perspective, but ultimately, the impact on our innovation rate.

Great. That's helpful. And on a similar note, you guys mentioned on the last call that the first half of fiscal '25 was more focused on commercializing some of the fiscal year '24 launches but that second half of '25 would be more focused on new product innovation. Curious as to how Q3 played out compared to your expectations.

Yes. I think that's right. We certainly spent, I would say, more focus in the first half on continuing to commercialize some of the new products we launched in fiscal '24, and we're seeing that good progress. Many of the products we launched are continuing to ramp commercially and globally to good effect, and we're certainly excited about that. And we've added new capabilities and new launches to enhance or add complementary aspects to some of those new products, as an example, for our BTW product that we launched last fiscal. We've now launched calibration benches so that customers can get those products calibrated in region. And we were actually able to sell some of that calibration technology to some of our channel partners as well. So that is complementary to the launch of the BTW. But then here in the second half and in Q3, we have brought some new products to market, for example, in the rail industry. Our team created a solution for pulling nails out of bridges, which really combines our new Enerpac pinpullers with a battery pump hoses couplers and a custom-made interface socket that connects with that pinpuller. So that's a new product that we launched here in Q3. That's specifically focused on the rail market, and that's just one example. So I think we continue to have a good mix between focus on commercialization and ramp products we've launched, but also bringing new products to market. I'd say particularly focused on our key verticals that we've talked about.

And this concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back over to Paul for closing remarks.

Okay. Well, thanks again for joining us this morning. Enerpac will be participating in the CJS Annual New Ideas Summer Conference on July 10 and the Seaport Research Partners Annual Summer Conference on August 19 and 20. We hope to see you there. Thank you, and have a great weekend.

Thank you, everyone, for joining. This does conclude today's conference. You may now disconnect.