Good morning and welcome to the Edgewell Personal Care Fourth Quarter and Full Fiscal Year 2019 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please also note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Chris Gough, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead sir.

Thanks, Dan. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us this morning as we discuss Edgewell’s fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2019 earnings. With me this morning is Rod Little, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Dan Sullivan, our Chief Financial Officer. Rod will kick off the call then will hand over to Dan to discuss quarterly and full year results and our 2020 outlook, and we will then transition to Q&A. This call is being recorded and will be available for replay via our website www.edgewell.com. During the call, we may make statements about our expectations for future plans and performance. This might include future sales, earnings, advertising and promotional spending, product launches, savings and costs related to restructurings, changes to our working capital metrics, currency fluctuations, commodity costs, category value, future plans for return of capital shareholders and more. Any such statements are forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views with respect to future events. These statements are based on assumptions and are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described under the caption Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018, as may be amended in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. These risks may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. We do not assume any obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law. During this call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are shown in our press release issued earlier today, which is available at the Investor Relations section of our website. Management believes these non-GAAP measures provide investors with valuable information on the underlying trends of our business. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Rod.

Thanks, Chris, and good morning, everyone. One year ago, our leadership team committed to delivering on a set of business and financial objectives for 2019, that we believe were achievable and reflective of the increasingly difficult competitive climate in evolving marketplace, particularly in North America Wet Shave. We knew that 2019 would play an important foundational role in the further stabilization of our business, and that meeting these objectives would require strong execution of Project Fuel. A transformational initiative to strengthen our Company, reduce our cost structure and simplify the way we work. It would require investment in our brands, in our most compelling growth opportunities and across key retail channels. And it would require a transformation of our portfolio, with an eye toward refining our brands and offerings and enhancing our commercial capabilities across the entire Company. Today, I am pleased to say that we have made meaningful progress on all of these objectives. Financially, we delivered net sales and adjusted earnings per share that were in line with our expectations, while again delivering healthy cash flow generation to structurally deleverage our balance sheet. Importantly and as expected, we made significant headway over the second half of the year with nearly every geography and segment demonstrating improved top line trends in the second half of the year as compared to the first half. I am pleased with the underlying improving top line trends and I believe the stabilization of our business that we have seen over the last two quarters, provides the necessary foundation for 2020. Dan will discuss this in more detail shortly. Project Fuel delivered above target at $122 million in gross savings, serving as the catalyst of change, redefining how we operate the business. And importantly, providing the necessary financial flexibility to reinvest and build on…

Thanks, Rod. Good morning, everyone. Overall, the fourth quarter played out, largely as we expected, reflecting our continued focus on executing against our core commercial and operational fundamentals. As a result, we saw further stabilization in our top line performance and accelerated gross savings from Project Fuel which were reinvested behind growth in key brands and markets. We also generated $74 million of free cash flow, up almost 23% versus the same quarter of last year, which allowed us to continue to delever. So let me start with a discussion of our operational performance in the quarter and then move to highlights for the full year and our outlook for fiscal 2020. Net sales in the quarter decreased 1.7% or minus 90 basis points on an organic basis. In line with our expectations as higher volumes in Grooming and Sun and Skin Care were more than offset by unfavorable price mix in Wet Shave. International organic net sales grew 4.8% in the quarter driven by Wet Shave and Sun and Skin Care and aided in part by the favorable timing impact of higher trade inventories ahead of the planned VAT increase in Japan, in October. Importantly, all three of our international geographic areas saw organic net sales growth. Organic sales in North America decreased 5.1% as growth in Sun and Skin Care and Infant and other was more than offset by declines in the Wet Shave and Fem Care segments. Looking at organic sales by segment. Wet Shave continue to stabilize decreasing 1.7% consistent with our results, a quarter ago and in line with our expectations and includes the favorable -- favorability resulting from the higher sales in Japan, ahead of the VAT increase. Organic sales in North America, which were down 9% continue to weigh on overall performance driven…

[Operator Instructions]. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assembler roster. Our first question is from Ali Dibadj with Bernstein. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, thanks. I guess, I have a few questions. One is from a category perspective, in North America, Men's grooming or men's Wet Shave. Have you seen any stability from a category volume perspective or competitive perspective in Men's and then separately and Women's at this point?

Yes, good morning, Ali, thanks for the question. The category, I think if you look at today versus where we were a year ago. It has stabilized across Men's and Women's. At this point a year ago, there were still Harry's rolling out in to Wal-Mart. You had Flamingo and Joy just coming into the equation. At this point, not yet in brick and mortar, but knowing it was coming in February. Right. Earlier this year. So that level of disruption that was playing out a year ago, has now played out and I think as we look at the categories in the U.S., in general, I would say, we view them as having stabilized. The market we have is roughly flat to up 1% and so pricing has stabilized and Shave incidents have stabilized. I would say, still slightly negative, but in better shape than where we were a year ago.

So if that's the case, can you just talk through in a little bit more detail. Maybe quantification would be helpful, too. In terms of the big ramp-up in investments next year. Understand that that's going to be a lot of advertising from your commentary earlier. But does that have the risk of destabilizing things again , it's a very delicate balance, as you know with your competitors even the fact that you're buying, one of them.

Yes, Ali, I think that from a competitive landscape, the category continues to be extremely competitive. Right, with Gillette as the clear market leader, with lots of financial flexibility in their model. WIC [Ph] coming with the Hybrid and having some level of success and some accounts and then not a brick and mortar retail but Dollar Shave, Unilever, out there from a competitive standpoint. So the landscape is very competitive, right, from a starting point. I think as we look toward our own business and the combination with Harry's, we're going to be focused on brand building and equity-building. We're not interested in looking at price and trade and trying to escalate that or lead -- lead a new round of what it has been value destruction over the last couple of years. And so our -- we're not going to be priced disadvantaged. We're not going to have barriers around trade margin to the trade wanting to partner and work with us. So we'll address those as they come up, but the bulk of our reinvestment is going to be into brand equity building activity, that will not only start to show benefit in 2020, but really in '21 and beyond.

Okay and just last question on Fem Care, you said I think last quarter that you do expect improvement. We're not really seeing it. Are you still sticking by your guns that we should see improvement in the next quarter or two?

Yes, we are Ali. What's unfortunate is just as the way Q4 sets up, there is some inventory stocking and promotion balance versus the prior period. That makes it look like a step back, however, if you look at share trends and consumption trends. They continue to improve behind what has been a stabilized distribution like-for-like outcome versus the prior period. So we remain confident that we will improve the trends in that business.

Our next question comes from Kevin Grundy with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hey good morning guys.

Hi Kevin.

Just to stick with the line of questioning. So it looks like the spending is largely going to be A&P related, which had been sort of coming down, understanding the business mix played a part in that, but if you go back too far, it was up north of 14% of sales. So the question is, is this sort of a permanent step up here as you're looking at it. Or is this something you think is going to have to continue to move higher over time. And then, do you feel like you have good visibility on the return that you're going to get, trends improved a bit in the back half of the year albeit maybe some of this was sort of comp driven. How good do you think your visibility is on some of these improving trends and then I have a quick follow up. Thanks.

On the increase in A&P year-over-year, we've talked about in the past that we were going to look to a period where we would spend more not less in equity building, up against the brands in the business. As we work through Project Fuel, as we assess the return we were getting on our plans in 2018 and 2019, frankly, we didn't see the return as being there, which is why you saw the A&P cuts. As we have better talent, better plans and programs, better exposure to categories and channels that have growth in them, you're seeing that investment come back in and I would tell you, as we look at it, 2020 is just the first step moving forward. Any meaningful move up from where we are in '20 would be dependent on the return that we see and get as we would look toward '21 and beyond. I will remind though, you and Kevin, but others looking at the business, the percentage up against the branded business is actually 1 point or so higher, when you factor out that we don't spend A&P against our private label, private brands business.

Yes, understood. That was the point I was alluding to. A quick follow-up and I'll pass it on. The long-term targets, last quarter, you guys basically supported, this was the $2.7 billion in sales and the $475 million in EBITDA, all in, including Harry's, so understanding that did not include the Infant and Pet divestiture. So if we adjust that that EBITDA number by call it like circa $15 million, are you still supporting that number to that and then, I'll pass it on ? Thanks.

Yes we're not changing our outlook. Kevin, we're not, we're not updating on that today. We stand by the outlook, but there will be an adjustment that needs to be made once we close Infant and Pet so that P&L will come out, whether it's $15 million or not, We've got to do that work. But, yes.

Yes. And maybe just to remind everyone of the building blocks that were behind that outlook because there's three foundational pillars to call out. One obviously is the Edgewell stand-alone business, which, as we've said profiles with stable topline performance, solid EBITDA and cash flow generation. And as you've heard us say today for 2020. This outlook that we provided lines up very well with the models developed during the diligence. Second element, of course, is the Harry's business. And while, we're not going to comment on that business today, what we have said is while it's historically not been profitable. We do anticipate continued strong top line performance here and therefore, significant leverage over costs providing the catalyst for meaningful EBITDA growth. And then, of course, the third part is -- is on synergies and although the deal was never defined through the lens of cost synergies. We continue to expect strong synergy capture beginning in the first full year post close 2021. So, yes, there will be an adjustment for Infant coming out, but we remain really excited about the opportunity behind those three pillars that really support the $475 million in 2021.

Our next question comes from Bill Chappell with SunTrust. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning.

Hey Bill good morning.

Rod. Just I think, we're all trying to understand how the A&P works going into kind of calendar 2020 with Harry's pending and when I say that it mean -- it seems tough to have an advertising marketing budget assuming the deal doesn't close near term, and so, I'm just trying to figure out part of the businesses since it's not going to close now maybe for the next few months, assume that through the spring resets. And early summer, do they really run separately from a customer facing side or can you if the deal closes sooner, is some of this advertising and marketing budget switch and how does this affect resets, do you have any say in kind of how the spring resets look with both brands or just kind of help us understand as we go, these next four months, five months with the transition still in place?

Yes, good question, Bill, thanks. It starts by we're separate independent companies today than our competitors. Right. So we've set this business plan up and what you see today, as a stand-alone legacy Edgewell company. And as part of that, because we will be coming together and that will happen relatively quickly here, what you're seeing today laid out is only part of the story. We thought it was important to give transparency and visibility to where the legacy business is, so that people understand that but it's certainly not reflective of what the plan would look like if we were going to be stand-alone with no eye toward the Harry's combination. And that said, we feel good about the plan that's been built this year, and the incremental A&P support is not all specifically up against Wet Shave. Right, when we get closed, we will look at putting that together with what Harry's has planned, and we will have a combined plan that maximizes the return across the combined business, but if you look at our plan and what we're doing in this plan. We have some really good growth profiles in our business that we want to keep going. Jack Black, Bulldog, China, e-com all double digit growers. The U.S. and Japan actually have some interesting return profiles where we want to put incremental investment into North America and Asia more generally. Our Sun Care business, we're excited about as we come through what has been a tough year with the reformulation and the allocation to start a late and wet sun season. We like the innovation we have planned for next year and we are putting investment back in behind Sun. That's our highest ROI return actually, historically, as we put increased investment against Sun. We see a nice return and then we have international doing well with Project International will continue to do well next year. So across all of those elements, where you think about where the A&P investment is going. The real overlap, if you will, with where our business and Harry's is quite small. But we'll look at that in a combined way once we can do that when we're closed, but if -- but we're happy that we're putting the investment back in. We think, it's necessary and right for the business.

Got it. And just as a quick follow-up, the international Wet Shave growth up 4%, is that a number, I guess, can you tell us how much of that was the pull-forward from Japan. And then kind of are you expecting that kind of low to mid single digit growth in 2020 for Wet Shave international ?

Yes. So the impact of Japan on the quarter totaled about 50 basis points. Obviously, if you're talking about international penetration, it's going to be higher than that. I think, look, we've seen, we've always projected growth out of the international business. We're excited that we saw growth two straight quarters and across all of our areas. So we'll continue to look for that business to grow and as Rod just said, we're going to continue to reinvest behind in [Ph] 2020 and beyond to ensure that growth.

Got it. Thanks.

Our next question comes from Olivia Tong with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Great, thanks. Good morning, Rod , Dan and Chris. I wanted to start on gross margin, and if you could give a little bit more detail on what sort of drove the decline this quarter. And what gets you to turn around? What's your expectation for fiscal '20 and obviously, we've talked a lot about your EBITDA expectations. But as you think about the contribution from gross margin, I would love to hear a little bit more on that. Thanks.

Sure. So in the quarter, look, we thought we had a pretty good line of sight to margin back in our 3Q call. I think, we identified 300 bps to 325 bps of year-over-year pressure played out slightly higher than that largely due to a bit more promotional intensity and a bit of negative mix, but overall, we certainly weren't surprised by the performance in the quarter, we had called for that. I think looking at the year overall, the main driver -- you've got meaningful Fuel savings that unfortunately, were largely absorbed by really ramp in inflationary pressures across all areas of the business, and then we made the choice to invest heavily in trade and promotion and price including reallocating funds out of A&P into additional trade. So that, if I had to summarize that was worth about 100 basis points of the 200 basis point year-over-year decline, and then you had some other items as well, slightly higher obsolescence cost and negative mix . Why we're comfortable with an outlook in 2020 that calls for stabilization is really a couple of things. So one, we expect some level of accretion from Fuel on margin rates even though, we still expect significant inflationary cost and some tariff pressures. We do expect that Fuel will provide some level of rate accretion. We're also taking selective price actions across certain markets and categories, which we think will be helpful to our margin profile. And then lastly, as we've said, we're going to moderate the level of trade spend versus what we saw in 2019. So when you put all those together, that's why, we're comfortable calling for a more stabilized margin picture in 2020.

Our next question comes from Jason English with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, folks. I appreciate you sliding [Ph] me in. Two questions from me. First on cost inflation. Can you give us a little more context around where this is coming from because it certainly stands in sort of stark contrast what we're seeing industrywide and you look at steel prices in the U.S., they've come in substantially or they've come in kind of the right direction, and packaging costs seem to be coming in. So it's little hard for us to foot kind of where this pressure is going to be so substantial for you?

Yes, absolutely. So I think, it's important to back up and just think about our total book of business. On the commodity side of the equation, which are actually things you're calling out to about 20% of our total cost structure. And in many of these categories, you're absolutely right. We are seeing not only easing of inflation. We're actually seeing deflationary trends around resin, around textiles, around packaging, around board. So completely agree with the assessment there. Having said that, we continue to anticipate meaningful cost headwinds in a few other areas , Sun Care Chemical costs continue to increase. Tariff headwinds are meaningful for us in 2020. If you think about not just the Sun Care Chemicals that we purchased out of China. But the steel costs associated with our Shave Prep business. And then on sort of the core business, we still anticipate headwinds mostly around wage pressure and a bid on transportation. So I guess, long story short, certainly some easing in commodities, but unfortunately other headwinds, namely in Sun Care Chemicals and tariffs keep us in a highly pressurized cost position.

That's helpful. Thank you. And I want to come back to Mr. Grundy's question and the bridge to $475 million, obviously, some adjustments before we counter lay [Ph] adjustments for Fem Care but it implies $100 million of EBITDA growth next year off of the guidance you have here and I think the base you setting for this year is a little bit lower despite a pull forward of savings. So now we've got less savings to look forward to in fiscal '21 with a lower base, it feels like the path to that $475 million is becoming a bit more stretched and a little harder to achieve. Can you help us -- help us contextualize the building blocks? So how do we get there? Why should we believe that that's still a feasible number ?

Hi, Jason. Good morning. We're not going to get into updating the details. We're not prepared to do that in total of how we get to the $475 million. We'll do that once we're closed and we can actually see the Harry's numbers and get into the detail and update the work we did back in the spring, when we put the guidance out. But if you look at the components and we said this in our commentary, the input to 2020 of the Edgewell business into that combined business plan is largely, where we thought it would be. Right. So we know that piece of the input and we know what we assumed for '21 on the Edgewell business. That I think from our perspective, we don't see a change there. Right. So that that actually is a piece to us that certain that then leads synergies and it leads to Harry's business performance and the leverage we can bring on those sales as they grow and roll out their business. And so it's those three pieces that come together, that when we look at keep us confident in the $475 million and what may look like a change to you, doesn't necessarily appear the same way internally.

Okay. That's helpful. I appreciate it. I'll pass it on.

Our next question comes from Faiza Alwy with Deutsche Bank. please go ahead.

I wanted to talk about Sun and Skin Care. I guess your first question is how sustainable, do you think those results are? And when -- what is the profitability outlook for that business because despite the strong sales growth, there doesn't seem to be much of a profit contribution there? So we would just love more color on that, thank you.

Yes, thanks, Faiza. I think for Sun and Skin. We see a lot of growth [Ph] to come in those categories. So what we've done specifically on Skin, up to this point primarily with Jack Black and Bulldog is something that as we look forward at the growth trajectories and profile. We see a lot of continued upside there. Double-digit growth rates is what we've historically done. We have that planned out into the foreseeable future and have line of sight to that. One of the important points behind your question in that, it makes us a little more bullish on that part of the portfolio is it's a rapidly growing segment, particularly the Men's Skin Care area. And so as we define our business around grooming, Wet Shave, Skin combined. There is really nice growth in that part of the business and we think, we have brands with the right portfolios and innovation pipelines to take advantage of that. So on Skin, we feel good about that. And then there is obviously a leg of that story that continues, once we get closed with Harry's. And you think about their exposure to that as well. On the Sun side, I think, we continue to feel good about the category overall, it's growing, and the issues we had this year. One was in our control with the Sun Care reformulation that we did at the beginning of the season to get that behind us, as opposed to it being a mid season cutover is really around supply assurance, but what that did to us is it put us on allocation of supply early in the season, which impacted our results this past year. And then that combined with through June, July, you had the wettest 52-month period on record in the United States, which got us off to a slow start and then with our brands being more around beach orientation, outside orientation with fewer beach incidents that obviously disproportionately impacted our shares. Moving forward, we can't control the weather, but that will normalize itself over time. We've made incremental investments in R&D around formulation capability, where we feel really good about our front-end formulation capability, significantly improved capability versus where we were two years ago and we like the innovation path we're on. And I think, we're also looking more holistically at the category and thinking about what our portfolio looks like not only around beach access but every day Sun. And if you look at brands that are winning such as Neutrogena, who has been growing share nicely, it's that everyday positioning that's quite important. So as we look going forward, the combination of all of that, I think, we feel really good about the category and our ability to participate in it.

Our next question comes from Steve Strycula with UBS. Please go ahead.

Hi good morning.

Good morning.

So question on the domestic Wet Shave business. I wanted to go through that and just kind of understand, how we ended the fourth quarter, down 9% and then ultimately what within your organic sales framework for 2020, how should that business shake out based off what you think of internal innovation, shelf resets and then more importantly, how should we think about the trade spend environment moderating and pricing going higher when the opposite proved true in the last quarter? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Steve. I want to go back to Faiza's -- the second part of Faiza's question around margin profile of Sun and Skin. We make nice margins on those businesses, they are below our Wet Shave blade razor margins and so there is a negative mix if you will there. And that's part of what we've been working through, from a margin perspective. But they are very profitable and within their segments. I would say, at or above category average profitability. So Steve, back to your question around the domestic Wet Shave business. I think, we're coming off of a period that has been volatile and dynamic around what's happening in the base, being quite different than what's happening in the current periods, just around like for like distribution, particularly with the Harry's rollout across before Wal-Mart display, and then you look at Joy and Flamingo coming in line as well. Right. We've had the impacts from that, we've adjusted price to be competitive with the end consumer and we've put incremental trade margin in to remove barriers of our trade partners wanting to work with us and partnering with us. So that's all in. And largely done. There is some incremental investment we're making next year, but it's very minor and very tactical certainly compared to where we've been. And so as we look going forward in the business, I see a much more stable environment, we'll have some moves from quarter to quarter, but I think, we're more like for like with distribution at this point, we're more stable with pricing. We were also lapping the Intuition f.a.b. launch on the women's side. It was launched in '18 that we were lapping in '19 with no equivalent launch essentially. So as we bring our innovation pipeline forward in the future, we're looking at how we sequence that throughout the year to have more stability, more predictability and obviously better innovation plans in general that come forward, that help us with our volume gains. And so I wouldn't spend too much time looking backwards in the category to try to predict the future. But I think in total, we have Wet Shave improving year-over-year versus what we did in '19, '20 will be better and that also holds true for the domestic U.S. business.

Our next question comes from Kate Grafstein with Barclays. Please go ahead. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Dan, I think you had mentioned taking select pricing across some markets next year and I was wondering, if you can maybe give more details there in terms of which segments or geographies? And then just separately, I was also wondering, if you could share your expectation for market share performance overall in the three segments for next year? Thank you.

Yes, I'm sorry, Kate, can -- we didn't catch the first part of your question, the line [indiscernible] pricing ?

Sorry, yes. I was just asking about which segments or geographies, you're planning to take some like pricing next year?

Yes. So we -- we're planning some pricing behind Sun. And I think, as Dan has laid out, where the chemical and input cost increases in those business have been substantial significant actually over the last couple of years now, particularly as the bar goes up on the ingredients that go into the Sun Care products in the FDA monograph, it's becoming more expensive to compete in that category in the formulate products. And so we see some pricing behind Sun that we have planned in and that's largely, it's status quo everywhere else from a category and geographic standpoint. And so that's the price increase. The second part of the equation around market shares. We've seen generally improving trends in market share over the second half of the year in '19 and we essentially expect that to continue as we go into '20. So I would call it generally a stable set of assumptions of year-over-year market share change.

That concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to chief executive officer Rod Little for any closing remarks.

Thank you everybody for joining today. We appreciate your time and interest in Edgewell.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.