Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Equinox Gold Third Quarter 2025 Results and Corporate Update. [Operator Instructions] And the conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Ryan King, EVP, Capital Markets for Equinox Gold. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for taking the time to join the call with us this morning. Before we commence, I'd like to direct everyone to our forward-looking statements on Slide 2. Our remarks and answers to your questions today may contain forward-looking information about the company's future performance. Although management believes our forward-looking statements are based on fair and reasonable assumptions, actual results may turn out to be different from these forward-looking statements. For a complete discussion of the risks, uncertainties and factors that may lead to actual operating and financial results being different from the estimates contained in our forward-looking statements, please refer to the risks identified in the section titled risks related to the business in Equinox Gold's most recently filed annual information form, which is available on SEDAR+, on EDGAR and on our website. And finally, I should mention that all figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated. With me on the call today are Darren Hall, Chief Executive Officer; Pete Hardie, Chief Financial Officer; and David Schummer, Chief Operating Officer. We will be discussing our third quarter 2025 production and cost results and providing an update on ramp-up progress at our Greenstone and Valentine mines after which we will take questions. The slide deck we are referencing is available for download on our website at equinoxgold.com, under the Shareholder Events section. You can also click on the webcast link to join the live presentation. And with that, I will turn the call over to Darren.

Thanks, Ryan, and turning to Slide 3. Good morning, everyone, and I appreciate you taking the time to join us on the call today. Firstly, I would like to acknowledge the efforts of all of Equinox's employees and business partners for their continued focus to responsibly deliver over 236,000 ounces during our first full quarter, including Calibre assets. Well done to the entire team. It is truly an exciting time for Equinox as we begin to realize the value of our expanded Americas-focused gold portfolio anchored by 2 new cornerstone gold mines in Greenstone and Valentine. As I've mentioned previously, the leadership team, supported by the entire organization is focused on creating shareholder returns by consistently delivering on its commitments, which are focused on demonstrated operational excellence, advancing high-return organic growth, rationalizing the portfolio and disciplined capital allocation. These are more than just words. Over the last quarter, we have made material progress on each of these commitments. Just a few examples: operational excellence. Production and costs were in line or favorable compared to consensus expectations and we remain on track to deliver into our full year consolidated production guidance. Importantly, we have made meaningful progress at Greenstone, which I'll talk to shortly. Advancing high-return organic growth. We poured force gold at Valentine where the ramp-up is progressing extremely well, a game, which I'll provide color on shortly. Additionally, Castle Mountain was accepted into the U.S. Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council's FAST-41 permitting program, which defines an anticipated record of decision in December of 2026. Rationalizing the portfolio. Post quarter end, we closed the sale of our Nevada assets for $115 million, including $88 million in cash. Disciplined capital allocation. We retired $139 million of debt during Q3 and have commenced Q4 with an additional $25 million in October. Turning…

[Operator Instructions] The first question today comes from Francesco Costanzo with Scotiabank.

Congrats on a good quarter. Maybe I'll start with Valentine. With the first of gold poured that was completed in September. Can you discuss some of the key performance milestones that you're tracking during the mine and mill ramp up? And then maybe after that, could you give us an update on the Phase II expansion study to increase the throughput to 5 million tonnes per annum?

Yes. Francisco, thanks and appreciate yours and Scotia's continued support. When we think about the milestones of Valentine, I guess, is that there's a lot of moving parts as you birth a new asset like Valentine. But I guess as the headline number here is that if we think of the first 66 days of performance of the entire facility since introducing ore in August 27, we've exceeded 70% of nameplate. And if we think about October in isolation, it's over 90% of nameplate. So all of the things that the team are focused on are clearly delivering in a great product. And as we look forward, they're now thinking about what's happening next, which is a good segue into Phase 2. We've tried purposely not to distract the team with Phase 2. But in the background, we have been doing work and over the last quarter, we've continued on our, we'll call it, options study analysis. And we now have good clarity on what the preferred option is going forward. And it's really a much simpler view than what we'd ever seen before. It doesn't include the addition of flotation. It specifically includes the addition of a twin ball mill, which provides additional redundancy in the circuit, which we see will comfortably deliver close to 5 million tonnes. So in this month, we'll actually commence the feasibility study and as I foresee earlier, I would anticipate going to the board in early Q2 for full funds approval so I would anticipate providing a fairly fulsome update here in the latter part of Q1 or early Q2.

Yes, that's great. Maybe if I could just 1 more on deleveraging. So net debt currently sitting around $1.3 billion. Can you outline your strategy for deleveraging and how that might relate to portfolio rationalization work that's underway. And with the Pan sale now closed, can you maybe highlight when we might expect to see the next transactions?

Sure. I guess there are 2 things that are running in parallel that we can kind of put a ring fence, if you will, around portfolio optimization. But if we think about -- I think you mentioned a $1.3 billion net debt. And if we look forward for the next 12 months and we think about our production portfolio, we call it 1 million ounces given the buoyancy and the privilege we see with buoyancy and gold price right now, and we look at our total cost, it's easy to see over $1 billion that we can put against delevering the balance sheet. So ignoring any asset sales, by the end of next year, we're going to be in a very, very solid liquidity position with a significant portion, if not the majority of our debt extinguished. So as we start to think about Valentine coming online, I would anticipate that we'll definitely be fully funded on Valentine before we make a go commitment. And we think about the additional organic growth that comes post that with Castle Mountain, we're going to be in a very solid position with that as well. Now specifically as it relates to our assets, well, if I think of assets as children, I love them all, but for the right price, I'll gladly part with one. So we have seen interest in some of our assets. And to that end, there are people when we encourage people, if you're interested in having a discussion come to us and we'll gladly entertain and we'll see how it makes sense. And if those assets and that offer would make more sense and value to our shareholders in someone else's hand versus ours. But we're not desperate to transact. But for the right price, if it makes sense for our shareholders, we'll gladly entertain and progress any opportunities. But this is very clearly a path for us to realize some additional value and look at how we could use cash from any sales in terms of funding our organic growth portfolio. But to reinforce also, this is looking at disposal of, not acquisitions.

The next question comes from Anita Soni with CIBC World Markets.

Darren, I just wanted to ask about your calculation of mine site free cash flow. I think there are some items in there that relate to basically nonoperating mines, so Los Filos, Castle Mountain and Valentine. Can you give a breakout of percentages or even millions of dollars like which ones I would allocate it to?

Yes, Anita. Again, I don't have that information in front of me, but I'll ask Peter. Pete, you're in a position to...

Unfortunately, no, not at this moment, Anita. I'm happy to -- we'll have that for you after the call.

Okay. Then I'll ask on Valentine, a follow-up question, I guess. On Valentine, the grades that you're introducing right now, it was like 0.77 grams per tonne, I think. And then I'm just -- not that this is the time to be concerned, but I was just curious, was that just a deliberate decision right now until you get the recovery rates where you want them to be, not to waste or is that something where you are in the mining sequence at lower grades initially? And how will that evolve over the next couple of quarters?

No. Thanks, Anita. And I appreciate the question, and it's a really, really good question. No, we're seeing very solid and actually positive reconciliation from our ore control to our resource and reserve models at Valentine. So very comfortable with what we see there, as we've talked about previously. As we talk about being in the first 2 months, we've specifically commissioned the plant on lower-grade materials. And the reason being is this that we want to practice on material is less important. But in hindsight, Jason and the team have done such a fantastic job that we probably should have just commissioned on the highest grade material because we're seeing recoveries in excess of feasibility out of the gate. So no, the team has done a great. But no, it's been a purposeful decision to process lower-grade materials and ramp up as we get comfortable with getting to the point where we can declare commercial production, which we would anticipate probably in the next month or so, right, definitely in the quarter.

Okay. So I'm going to ask 1 more since the first one didn't get answered, if that's okay. But it's similar on the grades going into Greenstone. So I think it said in October, you're at 1.34 gram per tonne material. I'm not sure if it was being fed to the mill or if that was what was being mined. But if it's 1.34, are you starting to see higher grades coming out of the pit specifically the underground areas where you were wondering if sort of the remnants around the old workings were there or not? Like have we seen -- is there any progress or update on the profile of the skin?

Yes. No, absolutely. And thanks again for the great question. Is that if we think about quarter-on-quarter, we saw a significant improvement at grades milled at Greenstone. It did go to 1.05 and they are milled grades, not mine grades. We have seen an improvement in mine grades as well in the quarter. I mean average mine grade in Q3 was 0.91 grams per tonne compared to $0.78 in Q2 and as you're aware, we're mining more material than what we're processing. We're purposefully processing the higher grade material. And from the material we are seeing, we are seeing a higher grade because of where we position ourselves geographically. But secondly, I think that the concerted focus we've had on getting reliable tonnes mined, which is allowing the team to focus on quality which is minimizing dilution and then also being very purposeful in and around how we treat material in and around the voids is definitely having a very positive impact on grade. And I think I mentioned on the earlier part of this call that there's been a focus for quite some time. But I'll suffice to say, in July, things got pretty serious with respect to grade, and we saw a step change in September with the average grade in September process to 1.38 and we've been able to maintain a 1.34 in October. So I think what we're seeing is a combination of the performance in the mine, allowing for focus on quality, which is allowing for a consistency in grade fed, which was always the model, but I think that we've got the right people focused on the right things, and we're starting to see the benefit from. So that, coupled with the continued improvements we see in mill throughput on a tonnes per hour or tonnes per day basis will definitely lead to a much stronger Q4 with growth momentum into 2026.

The next question comes from Mohamed Sidibe with National Bank Capital Markets.

Maybe I could start with Greenstone. Just wondering if you could maybe give us a little bit of color on your current stockpile in terms of tonnage and grade at Greenstone currently, if possible?

Yes. No, sure. At the end of month October, again, this is from memory, but I guess is that the important part of the stockpile is the highest grade material and we have the better part of a month of high-grade material in front of us and the grades in excess of 1.5 grams. Then there's the other material, which is a little lower grade material, but we're talking 2 million or 3 million tonnes at around 0.7 grams per tonne and then we've got the lower grade material as well. But in total, we've got in excess of 8 million tonnes of stockpile in front of the plant as it stands today.

That's great. And maybe if I could just move in terms of capital allocation priorities. I think back in Q2, you talked about, of course, deleveraging your balance sheet, paying down debt and reinvesting within your growth projects. But in terms of capital return, you had talked about potentially mid-2026. Since then, I think gold has moved over $500 per ounce. Have your thoughts changed around your capital return program at all? Or should we still target mid 2026 for a potential update on that front?

Well, I guess, is kind of foreshadowed earlier, if we kind of ignore any potential cash that can come in from an asset divestment, I think we're going to find ourselves significantly delevered by the end of 2026 and at that point, we'll be having some pretty material conversations about vehicles to be able to return additional capital to shareholders. I mean, Pete, what would you layer on this one.

Yes. I think, Mohamed, if you're -- as you said, if you're looking at 2026, that will be a 2026 discussion. So for purposes of modeling, if you will, just assume no capital returns for next year. We are really very entirely focused, as Darren just said a couple of times now on delevering.

Yes. And if we think about capital allocation holistically. Aside from exploration, the most accretive investment we can make is to ensure that we deliver into our production commitments at a responsible price. From that, with cash it's delevering the balance sheet, but it's positioning ourselves for our significant organic growth as we see through Valentine Phase 2, Castle Mountain. And then the additional benefit we'll see from Los Filos in the next couple of years as well. So I think our strategy on capital allocation is very clear. And if we find ourselves with a cash inflow vis-a-vis an asset disposal that could then provide additional talk to return capital to shareholders through a dividend or a share buyback or some other form. But the organic growth opportunity within the portfolio, exploration and the assets are mentioned Valentine, Castle, Los Filos will provide significant returns to our shareholders.

The next question comes from John Tumazos with Very Independent Research.

Could you elaborate on the Phase 2 expansion to 5 million tonnes potentially for Valentine. Would the 15,000 tonnes a day, be it the same grade to suggest the 2029 output as much as 400,000 ounces?

Yes, John -- and thanks for the question. I appreciate your support. If we think about the feasibility study that was put out at the end of 2022 for Valentine, it had a 2.5 million tonne base plant, expanded to 4 million tonnes. And what that did is that delivered into the feasibility study, which generated a 175,000 to 200,000 ounces a year over a reserve life of 14 years. So now what we've been looking at is what's that optimal increment that we could add to the base facility. And what we've been looking at is that optionality. So where we see right now is this that we see a path to something that's comfortably in that, call it, 5 million tonnes because it makes the math easy so would it be a 20% increment in throughput over what was included in the feasibility study. So I think then you make some assumptions on what would the incremental grade be. So if we be -- let's be -- let's assume that the grade is consistent with the average. It would then demonstrate a proportional increment of 25% improvement in production. Stepping back, I think that if we look at this -- the exploration success we've seen from Frank and the other potential along the property that will all come together around the same time. I think over the next year, we'll be sitting back and saying, clearly, we'll have an optimal incremental throughput, the material that feeds into that will be significantly impacted by our exploration success, and we look at optimizing the plants. Everything we've done to date has assumed the same relatively conservative mine plan, resource base and pit designs that we used in the 2022 feasibility study. So I think that we have a very favorable view on the increment at Valentine. But I think that will become more favorable as we optimize the plant 4 or 5 million tonne plant, and we start to see the benefits from the reconciliation that we anticipate going forward. Early days, but given the nature of the deposit, I would anticipate we're likely to see some positivity in terms of reconciliation above a cutoff. So no, I think that it's -- it's too early to say absolutely what the numbers are, John. But if I was sitting on your side of the table, trying to fill in a model, I would probably replace the $4 million with $5 million and then use something that was just proportional on throughput accordingly. Throughput beg your pardon on ounces.

If I can ask another, what is the best way to manage the benches at Greenstone when you have waste benches, 0.7 gram stockpile benches. And then highs as nice as 1.5 grams. Do you have all the same size shovels and trucks? Or do you have a few half size to quarter size shovels and trucks to go in and get those sweet spots without waste.

It's a good question. It leads to really a selectivity issue, John, in terms of how selective can you be. And I think that we're seeing that with the level of control, we can be more selective. But to take the situation where you're running from, say, a 10 or a 12-meter bench. You're making the benches smaller. Do we think there's going to be a material improvement inability to be able to deliver higher grade as a function of selectivity -- and I think in short, it's early days, but I don't believe from what I see, there's going to be a significant opportunity. There's going to be interesting areas where maybe it's more relevant than others. But generally speaking, I consider as it stands today, a Greenstone is more of a bulk mining, want to have a level of quality. But for the equipment size is rightsized for the operation we have, and it's really going to be about lowering our unit cost of production vis-a-vis mining processing and spending G&A as efficiently as we possibly can to have the most positive impact we can on all-in sustaining costs and maintaining margins given whatever gold price. And I'll maybe ask Tom. Tom, is there any layer in there from a selectivity perspective in terms of what we see from a resource reserve perspective.

No, Darren, I think you covered it. I think the again, John, some of the things mentioned in the commentary of the conference call with respect to some of the ore control practices and things we're putting in with some of the automated systems and paying close attention to the geology as we go bench to bench is helping manage dilution. And we definitely are looking at some of these selectivity studies in the background. But to Darren's point, on mass, there doesn't appear to be a benefit. There can be selective areas where we can go in and be very in certain areas pick cherries out. But on mass, John, this isn't going to be a flitched -- several fetched benches as we go down.

Again, if we think about the contrary here at Valentine, we see good opportunity, and we have 2 specific mining fleets, a larger fleet, the smaller fleet and specifically to use a smaller fleet where there's a good opportunity to be more selective, and therefore, preferentially mine at a lower grade, not only just use the stockpiles. So yes. No, I think we have a good plan at Greenstone and we'll continue to look for those opportunities to positively impact grade.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Darren Hall for any closing remarks.

Yes. Thank you, operator. I'd just like to close by thanking all of our stakeholders for their continued support and everyone's participation and questions on the call this morning. It is appreciated and valued. And as always, Ryan, I and the entire leadership team are always available if you have any further questions. So with that, take care. Be well and back to the operator.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.