Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Ero Copper First Quarter 2024 Operating and Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] The conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Courtney Lynn. Senior Vice President of Corporate Development, Investor Relations and Sustainability. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, and welcome to Ero Copper's first quarter earnings call. Our operating and financial results were released yesterday afternoon and are available on our website as are our financial statements and MD&A for the 3 months ended March 31, 2024. On the call with me today are David Strang, Ero's Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer; Makko DeFilippo, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Wayne Drier, Chief Financial Officer. We will be making forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties from which actual results may differ materially. We would refer you to our most recent annual information form available on our website, SEDAR and EDGAR for a discussion of the risk factors of our business and their potential impact on future performance. As a reminder, and unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in U.S. dollars. I will now pass the call over to David Strang.

Thank you, Courtney, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We've had a great start to 2024, driven by the strong execution of our growth strategy coinciding with highly favorable market conditions for copper and gold. During the quarter, copper prices rallied to their highest levels in nearly 2 years, fueled by rising demand expectations, while the supply outlook remains extremely constrained, as evidenced by our recent treatment and refining charge negotiations where we locked in 2-year TC/RC terms in the low teens on roughly 1/3 of our projected concentrate production. At the same time, due to macro and geopolitical uncertainty, gold prices hit all-time highs. These positive trends in both copper and gold markets arrive at an opportune time as we are on track to reach our highest annual production levels ever. This includes anticipated contributions from the Tucuma project which is now approximately 97% complete. I'm also happy to share that commissioning of Tucuma advancing ahead of schedule, and as a result, we are narrowing our projected time line for initial production to early Q3 '24. While Makko will delve into more detail on our progress at Tucuma, I want to express my deepest gratitude to our team on the ground, which just marked over 5 million hours of work completed with 0 lost time injuries. This is an incredible achievement and I commend our leadership team at Tucuma for the strong safety culture built over the past 2 years. As we rapidly approach an important inflection point in our consolidated copper production profile, I'm also pleased to report that our Xavantina Operations are on track to deliver record gold production again this year. In fact, during the first quarter, we produced 18,234 ounces, representing an increase of nearly 5,800 ounces or approximately 47% compared to the…

Thank you, and good morning, all. As we turn the corner towards the finish line on the construction phase of the Tucuma project, I want to reiterate what David said and recognize our site leaders, our operational teams and our third-party partners at the Tucuma project for their continued commitment to safety. Since green lighting the Tucuma build, our top priority as an organization has been to deliver the project safely. While we have had many successes at Tucuma over the past few years, I speak for all of us here at Ero and say that our performance on safety is what we are most proud of. When we're looking our safety record, reaching 97% physical completion this quarter, achieving key commissioning milestones ahead of schedule with a line of sight visibility we now have on our unchanged $310 million capital cost estimate, to put it simply, we are finding a lot to celebrate at Tucuma these days. Looking at where we are at in terms of commissioning and production sequencing for the balance of the year, we have continued to make excellent progress towards the start of operations. Following the successful completion and ramp-up of our crushing, screening and conveyance systems earlier this year, we've been able to focus all of our attention to the systematic completion of our milling, flotation and filtration systems in order to commence integrated commissioning. With the recent completion of our freshwater intake system as well as the conclusion of major mechanical and subcomponent commissioning steps [indiscernible] the process plant, we expect to initiate integrated commissioning just prior to the end of the quarter. On the mining side at Tucuma, which is already in full operational mode, our cumulative operational performance remains well ahead of schedule despite strong rains during the second half of…

Thank you, Makko. As David highlighted, our financial results for the quarter reflected several positive factors. These included rising copper and gold prices, record production and margins at the Xavantina Operations and the sale of copper concentrate inventories carried over from the fourth quarter at the Caraiba Operations. In addition, a favorable move in foreign exchange led to a realized gain on our foreign exchange hedges of $2.1 million that contributed to first quarter cash flows from operations of $17.2 million and adjusted net income attributable to the owners of the company of $16.8 million or $0.16 per share on a diluted basis. Subsequent to quarter end, we elected to take advantage of another favorable move in the exchange rate and added a layer of zero cost collars for the second half of this year with floor and ceiling rates of $5.15 and $5.62, respectively. The real has since strengthened against the U.S. dollar, falling back to a rate of approximately $5.05 yesterday. As at the end of last month, the total notional value of our foreign exchange derivative position for the remainder of 2024, including both the zero cost collars and forward contracts was a little over $250 million. These hedges cover nearly all of our real-denominated operating expenses and the majority of our major project capital expenditures for the remainder of the year and have a weighted average floor and ceiling of $5.02 and $5.38, respectively. Of the total hedge program, approximately $65 million is allocated for major project capital expenditures with a weighted average floor and ceiling of $5.10 and $5.23, respectively. The quarter saw a significant decrease in our capital expenditures with [indiscernible] quickly winding down as we approach initial production. As a result, we ended the quarter with a total liquidity position of $156.7 million, including $51.7 million in cash and cash equivalents plus $105 million of undrawn availability under our senior secured revolving credit facility. We have also entered into a $50 million nonpriced copper prepayment facility subsequent to the quarter end. This facility provides cost-effective capital in a favorable physical copper market, particularly in light of persistently higher interest rates. The repayment of this facility is structured over 27 equal monthly installments of 272 metric tons of copper beginning in October 2024. Should the market value of the copper delivered in any given month exceed $2.1 million, we will receive a repayment for the excess amount. I will now pass the call back to David to share some closing thoughts.

Thank you, Wayne, and thank you, everybody who joined the call today. Before we proceed to the Q&A session, I want to extend my deepest gratitude to our teams in Brazil and Canada for their continued commitment and hard work in executing on both our operating plan and our organic growth strategy. I look forward to our third quarter earnings call when I expect to discuss the ramp-up of production underway at Tucuma. Now I will hand the call back to the operator to open the line for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Today's first question is from Gordon Lawson with Paradigm Capital.

So starting with Caraiba, to hit the 2024 guidance, is it reasonable to model nearly 4 million tons of throughput for the year -- and what average grade would you be expecting for the remainder of the year here?

Great question. Thanks for that. Yes, look, I think -- if you look at what we accomplished in Q1 in terms of our cadence on production for the year, in terms of copper, we're expecting our production to be second half weighted. I think it's reasonable to assume that we'll be slightly below that 4 million-tonne target, like our original guidance for the year was just below that given the ramp-up of our mill expansion circuit in Q1. And we anticipate grade being obviously slightly higher through the full year, but around 1.2% to 1.3% in the full year.

Okay. Okay. Yes, that works out here. And just looking ahead, so there's been a lot of significant success on exploration at Caraiba and reading what's going on at Pilar right now, so I'm just curious if there are other expansions being evaluated further down the pipeline.

Yes. We do have and we've been open with regards to a number of ore bodies that we've identified in the northern part of the project and the property. We are evaluating longer-term and nothing imminent, but certainly longer-term opportunities in order to try and extract value from those ore bodies, which may include longer term -- the potential to construct a second concentrated plant in the north, but that's very preliminary right now. Where we stand overall with regards to our operations at Caraiba is, the focus now is purely on getting the shaft completed, which will allow us to then access very high-grade material in the deepening project and then further take us back to the position that we've always wanted to be and have been as one of the lower-cost producers of copper in the world by accessing these high-grade ore bodies to depth in the Pilar Mine.

The next question comes from Orest Wowkodaw with Scotiabank.

Questions for Makko around the Tucuma ramp-up and completion here. I mean you're guiding to a start up in early July, so call it 2 months from now. What would you consider to be sort of the big critical path items that need to happen in order to achieve that time line?

Yes. Great question, Orest. Look, I think we're -- if you strip it all down and you look at what needs to happen between now and July, I'd say we're in the final -- the home stretch, which I would define as electrical installations, automation and some of the minor piping like compressed air, reagent pipelines, et cetera. So if you look at the project holistically from a critical path perspective, we really are down to the final straw. And we continue to make excellent progress on those initiatives. So in terms of our progress on, I would say, noncritical path piping, also the automation circuits that we're putting, electrical cabling and instrumentation, that's really where our focus is for the next 2 months.

Just to add to that, I mean, where we are right now, we are already running water through the filtration. That means through the flotation circuits and the Jameson Cells. We're in the process of turning the mill on. As we've previously put in, all dry commissioning has been completed, and we have all now sitting on the -- not the core source stockpile -- the run-of-mine stockpile. And so really, as Makko has pointed out there, we're really down to the final little straws here. We're looking forward to turning on the tailings filtration plant over the course of the next couple of weeks. And then moving as aggressively as we can towards full running of the wet circuit over the course of the next 3 weeks.

Just following up, I mean, earlier, you mentioned that you hope to exit Q3, I think I heard it 80% of throughput. I mean that's a pretty quick ramp up if we're talking to start up in early July. Like what are you seeing that gives you that kind of confidence in terms of compressed ramp-up schedule?

Yes, I don't think -- to be honest, I don't think it's that compressed. I mean I think we've given ourselves a better runway on the early Q3 startup. I think the other thing I would point to is that we are commissioning these independent systems, again, on a daily basis here. So if you look at our flotation system, as Dave mentioned, our Jameson Cell, our filtration systems are being run and it's been designed independently. So I think there's a lot of activity happening that gives us comfort in the time line. But if you look at our total ramp-up schedule, obviously, we have a relatively, I would say, standard ramp-up rate to achieve 80%. We're not forecasting achieving 100% nameplate capacity for about 9 months as our total ramp-up curve. So said differently, I think in the initial phase, I think we're in really good shape to achieve that 80% nameplate. Obviously, the ramp-up will continue over that 9-month period. But I don't think that our ramp-up curve is -- well, I know for fact, in looking at many different projects, that our ramp-up curve is right in the middle of the fairway.

Okay. And just a final question, if I could. I remember the current mine plan for Tucuma obviously has very high copper production in the first 2 years or so. Then I'm wondering if you're seeing anything on the exploration side that could potentially extend that high-grade, sort of high production level for longer, beyond 2026 and maybe what the time line might be to see an updated mine plan around that?

Thanks, Orest. Good question. So with respect to -- if you remember, we do have a currently small underground resource with regards to below the current pit. Which is very high-grade in nature, very similar to the grades that we've been mining in the first couple of years. Mike and the team -- and for those who don't know, Mike Richard, our Chief Geologist, and the team are ramping up and getting ready to bring the rigs back in to continue to drill out the underground extension option with a view that we'll start supplementing -- when we start seeing the higher grade decline from the open pit that we'll start supplementing that lower grades as we mine with higher grade from the underground operation. As it stands right now, we've got time to be able to do that over the course of the next 18 months to 2 years, and greater clarity will come out with regards to that mine plan over that time period. So this is our constant moving target with regards to Tucuma. There's only so much that we can take on at any one time. But certainly, the rigs are getting ready to come back in the third, fourth quarter with a view to drilling out additional underground resources that can be -- looked to be mined. I'd look at it kind of something similar to what we've done at [indiscernible] in terms of size operation potentially down the road. And then as I said, supplementing the grades from the underground option at that time.

The next question comes from Craig Hutchison with TD Bank.

Just a question on Caraiba with regards to the comment that there were some delays in underground development required to access the scheduled high-grade stopes. Is that now behind you guys? Or is there some issues that might creep into Q2 as well?

Yes. Thanks, Craig. We don't see those issues creeping into Q2. I'd say relative to where we thought would be on development in some of these high-grade stopes that there are a variety of factors contributed to that in terms of equipment availability primarily. So we -- as I said in the call here, coming out of Q1 and early Q2, we've seen strong development rates and also production. So we think that's largely behind us here.

And just in your opening remarks, I think that they said that you've seen some favorable concentrate off-trade terms. I don't know if you guys can speak to some of those terms and kind of what your exposure is for -- in terms of pricing for offtake in the back half of this year?

Yes. Thanks, Craig. Yes. So we've been taking advantage of what a lot of people know in the marketplace is the favorable TC/RC terms. We've entered into 2 contracts so far. They will be kicking in from May onwards, this month onwards, 2-year contracts for about 1/3 of our production. Obviously, we don't want to go into too much detail because it's unfair to all parties involved. But in general, the terms are in the low teens. We are looking to strengthen that portfolio right now with regards to an additional tender that we're about to enter into with various suppliers, and we're waiting to receive those tender offers over the course of the next couple of weeks to further enhance that and increase the total amount that we have exposed at some of these lower TC/RC rates. But on an overall basis, 2 years for about 1/3 of our production beginning in May in the low teens, if you look in to model.

Maybe one last question for me. I know you guys are excited about the Furnas project. Any kind of color in terms of when you guys be able to finalize a definitive agreement.

Yes. We're down to Deepk Hundal, our lawyer -- Chief Counsel, who is here. And he is down to the nitty gritty with regards to the last couple of comments between ourselves and Vale. So that agreement is imminent with regards to signature. This is -- with regards to making sure that this agreement is done correctly. This is a template with regards to a lot of things that we're hoping to work with Vale in the future, so we all want to make sure both from our side and Vale's side that we get this right. I am happy to say that we have signed with Vale, a core sharing agreement that now allows us to move all of the core for the Furnas project into the core shack for the project, and that will allow us to immediately move as aggressively as we can to put together a 43-101 compliant mineral reassessment that we hope that we'll be in a position to share with the market sometime in the third quarter this year.

The next question comes from Stefan Ioannou with Cormark Securities.

Just wondering with the positive grade reconciliation we're continuing to see at Xavantina, is there any thought of maybe going in and doing some additional drilling ahead of production to really nail down your mine plan? Or I mean, I appreciate it's vein. So maybe is the plan just to continue mining and then get what you get?

Yes. Great question, Stefan. Look, I think the uniqueness of the Xavantina and where we're at now, I think one of the -- what we talked about last quarter was the restriction on search ellipses. So we have to go back and check exactly how much infill drilling will be required. But I think for right now, the approach that we've taken is, as Dave mentioned, we are doing development ahead of mining. So where we have channel sampling, and we have a high degree of confidence in the grades continuing, we've assumed now flow through our full year production result. But I'd say that in general, if you go back several years, the reconciliation against our long-term model to short term has been really good. So in terms of going in and drilling out in detail and incurring that additional cost, given where we're at and where we see the positive reconciliation heading, at least for these next few levels, I'm not sure that, that expense is warranted at this stage.

I think, Stefan, just to add to that, I mean, the zone that we're encountering here is not particularly wide. And so it's fortuitous that we've hit it. We've got 5 or 6 holes into them. As Makko said, the constraint on top cutting and [indiscernible] is around holes. Have been conservative in this area. And I think it's the best thing just to continue to do and just take it as a happy opportunity right now for as long as it continues to give it to us. Certainly, if we're in a situation next year and we're already -- and we continue to see this, we may have to rethink that strategy. But right now, as Makko said, it's really not worth trying to drill out this zone and trying to add into our resource or reserve estimate.

And maybe one other one for me, just on the gold exploration with Ero. I mean, obviously, nickel is still something we always think about in the background. Is there any more updates there? I know there was talk of still trying to secure some property positions before you sort of really [indiscernible] even a hard run. Is that still the case? Or...

Yes. Yes. We continue to do work on nickel albeit not at the same rate as we had done early last year. I've asked the team to take a step back and do them because, as I've mentioned in the past over, the last 6 to 8 months, the nickel opportunity has got a lot bigger than we ever thought it would become. And with that, I think we have to be cognizant and disciplined with regards to how we go about evaluating all of these target areas. And what we do in terms of going about that. A lot of this is predicated right now with regards to the government auction process. I'm happy to say the government has given us notification that they will imminently start that process, and we hope to see that and be able to give the marketplace more insights into how the auction has gone, et cetera, in the third quarter. But certainly, the opportunity set on nickel sulphide exploration is significant and -- but we just need to be super smart with regards to how we approach this right now because I think you could really go and blow your brains out in terms of trying to attack this too quickly. And so Mike and his team are evaluating a number of different things with regards to surface geochemistry work, with regards to ground-based EM analysis, et cetera, to see if there are ways that we can shortcut this process as opposed to having to drill significant amounts of holes to try and identify opportunities in nickel sulfide. So very much a work in progress and certainly, one that we continue to evaluate and we'll continue to work on. But right now, the priority remains for us is Tucuma. When Tucuma done, obviously, Furnas is such a big growth opportunity for us that, that really provides a great future for us as a copper mining company. And as and if nickel continues to develop, so we will continue to follow it on a need basis.

The next question comes from Connor Mackay with Ventum Financial.

Just along the same vein as the first question asked here. I was just wondering approximately when are you expecting to hit that full 4.2 million ton per annum run rate at Caraiba.

Yes. Great question. Look, I think for us at Caraiba, obviously, we completed the mill expansion. Here, we have Honeypot in production in the upper levels of the mine I would classify as the whole complex. The deepening is in production as well. So those increased production rates up to [ 4.2 ] will be closed this year when the dust settles. But in terms of getting over 4 million tons, that's really going to be a post shaft completion when we have the 2 mine system completed at Pilar Mine. So as I said, if you look at our throughput estimate for this year, it's going to be up significantly relative to prior years. But achieving the full mill capacity, as I said, is really longer term when we have those shafts operating.

Awesome. And then just one more quick one on Tucuma with the transition into operations from construction and getting into the first full year production next year, what kind of levels of sustaining capital should we be expecting, particularly in relationship to the most recent technical report, which I imagine, there's some level of inflation that needs to be factored in there at this point?

Yes. Look, in the first year of operations, I wouldn't anticipate much in the way of sustained capital at all really. I mean, obviously, we will be continuing to do some stripping during the year. But if you look at our strip ratio in the first year is still really low. So I would anticipate that most of that is expensed in the first year. So we don't get into meaningful pushbacks until later on in the mine life, but we'll incur additional sustaining costs related to stripping. So it's going to be a small amount. I don't have the exact number off the top of my head here. We can follow up in a call afterwards to give you the specifics, but it's going to be very small.

Thank you. This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to David Strang for any closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. And again, thanks to everybody for coming on the call. We really appreciate everybody's interest in our company. We look forward to talking to you all again in August where we hope to be having more detailed and granular conversations with regards to which the exact day is that we're going to actually hit commercial production, and we'll be happily talking to you about how Tucuma is coming on schedule and the concentrate sales that we've started to make at that time. So thanks again, everybody, and we look forward to talking to you again, as I said, in August. Enjoy your summer. Thank you.

This brings to an end to today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.