Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Element Solutions Q3 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. Later there will be an opportunity to ask questions during the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions]. I will now turn the call over to Varun Gokarn, Senior Director of Strategy and Finance. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for participating in our third quarter 2021 earnings conference call. Joining me are Executive Chairman Sir Martin Franklin; CEO, Ben Gliklich; and CFO, Carey Dorman. In accordance with Regulation FD or Fair Disclosure, we are webcasting this conference call. Any redistribution, retransmission or rebroadcast of this call in any form without the expressed written consent of Element Solutions is strictly prohibited. During today’s call, we will make certain forward-looking statement that reflect our current views about the company’s future performance and financial results and dividend policy. These statements are based on assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Please refer to our earnings release, supplemental slides and most recent SEC filings for a discussion of material risk factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations and predictions. These materials can be found on the company’s website in the Investors section under News & Events. Today’s materials also include financial information that has not been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Please refer to the earnings release and supplemental slides for definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to comparable GAAP financial measures. It is now my pleasure to introduce Ben Gliklich, CEO of Element Solutions.

Thank you, Varun, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining. Despite a problematic supply chain environment and turbulence in the automotive market, our business is thriving. We delivered net sales that were a record for Element Solutions with solid incremental margins and strong free cash flow this quarter, while faced with both logistics and supply chain disorder that drove increased costs and impacted demand. Our people are embodying our culture. They're stepping up to challenges and showing commitment to our company and our customers. This is helping to ensure reliability of service and to mitigate raw material sourcing shortages in our own supply chain. At the same time our organization continues to focus on and deliver against strategic growth priorities, such as power electronics for electric vehicles, new customer wins from our core electronic and industrial markets and sustainability solutions. Underlying demand in our markets remains healthy and while supply chain dynamics will continue to create volatility over the next several months we are more excited than we have ever been about the long-term prospects for this company. We closed our acquisition of Coventya on September 1st and are off to a running start with our integration work streams. The benefits of this combination in terms of growth opportunities and cost savings are becoming increasingly tangible just two months after closing. While we still have significant work to do to realize the value from this combination and carry forward our current momentum through year end, we're energized by the way these teams are working together. Our increased product breadth and expanded set of commercial relationships are already unlocking incremental opportunities for us. The electronics industry continued to grow in the third quarter, bolstered by expansion and communications infrastructure, consumer electronics and automotive electronics. Our electronics segment posted monthly sales…

Thanks, Ben. Good morning everyone. Starting on slide four, we review the key drivers of organic sales growth in Q3 across our verticals. The electronics segment grew net sales by 11% organically in the quarter with all three verticals again growing in the double digits. Circuitry solutions grew 14% organically, driven by persisting strength in high-end electronics and memory disk markets. The more typical 3Q seasonal uplift and demand returned due in part to new higher-end mobile launches. We did however see some softness in a few high-end margin product areas linked to delays and production schedules. This is delayed not lost business. Our semiconductor solutions business grew 12% organically driven by strong volume increases across communication and automotive end markets. Sales value for wafer plating and advanced packaging solutions were also driven by inflation and precious metal prices, which would generally pass on to our customers. Assembly grew 10% organically. Demand here came from continued strength in the broader electronic markets and growth in our power electronics products, which mainly serve the electric vehicle supply chain. Our Asian business where most of our sales are generated in this vertical was stronger than Europe and the Americas. While we continued to improve the margin mix within our assembly portfolio, the impact of increased pass through tin prices muted the otherwise strong margin uplift would have seen during the quarter. Constant currency adjusted EBITDA margins in the electronics segment decreased only 60 basis points despite the impact of these metal prices. This result was driven by volume-based operating leverage and positive product mix, which helped largely offset raw material price inflation, net of the pricing actions we've taken and the return towards more normal operating expense levels. The industrial and specialty segment had an even stronger quarter, growing net sales by…

Thank you, Carey. Turning to our outlook for the balance of 2021, our updated guidance is on slide six. Our markets remain generally healthy and our teams are executing well against our strategies to capture value beyond market growth. Inclusive of a full quarter of Coventya results we expect fourth quarter 2021 adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $118 million with a contribution from Coventya of approximately $8 million. Electronics demand remains strong. The weak auto market will have a negative impact on our industrial segment relative to previous expectations, while typical seasonality is responsible for the balance of the sequential decline. As you know, our fourth quarter last year benefited from the robust recovery from COVID shutdowns and later than typical new handset platform launches, so the year-over-year comparison is more challenging. We're updating our full-year 2021 adjusted EBITDA expectation to a range of $515 million to $525 million inclusive of four months of Coventya results. This equates to roughly $505 million to $515 million excluding Coventya. Notably, we expect to deliver results within our previously stated guidance range for the full year of 2021 despite an incrementally worse automotive backdrop and less favorable FX environment. We continue to expect full year adjusted earnings per share to exceed a $1.35, which is approximately 40% growth year-over-year. In the context of our strong earnings growth and our expectation for continued growth from here, we expect to increase our dividend again this quarter. The second time we'll have done so in calendar year 2021. We believe 2022 is shaping up to be a year of robust growth. Given the dynamic environment it's early to provide guidance, but the overall outlook is positive. If we'd owned Coventya for the full year in 2021, we would have expected 2021 adjusted EBITDA taking into account the synergies we expect to realize during this first year to be closer to $560 million, and we expect organic growth off of this base next year given the secular trends in our electronics business, an expected cyclical recovery in our industrial business and our proven ability to outgrow both markets through strong execution. We continue to have high conviction around the mega trends powering our end markets and a demonstrated ability to invest prudently behind them. To wrap up, I'd like to thank all of our stakeholders for their continued supportive element solutions and in particular our talented and dedicated people, who help make this outstanding quarter possible. With that operator, please open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] And we will take our first question today from Steve Byrne with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Yes. Thank you. Ben, your comments about Coventya sound more constructive after having a couple months with them now. My question for you is your outlook on that acquisition improving more because you see opportunities for productivity? Or is this really more about cross-selling or pricing power outlook from here?

Thanks for the question, Steve. I think the answer is both. The Coventya business outperformed, the forecast we bought the business off of, it has strong momentum despite a weaker automotive backdrop and obviously automotive is a part of that business. The teams are coming together really, really well from a commercial perspective, identifying great opportunities. The relationship strength is very complementary. So certain accounts where Coventya had great relationships, we had weaker relationships and vice versa. So we see a really compelling growth opportunity from the business. And then, from a synergy standpoint as well, the savings opportunities are becoming more tangible and we've got line of sight to delivering in excess of what we've committed to in terms of cost savings in a reasonable period of time. So both growth and savings are making us more encouraged there.

And any acceleration in any of that or seasonality to take into consideration to help us estimate what the 2022 EBITDA contribution might be? Is it simply 4x, your EBITDA estimate for Q4?

There's a little bit of variability associated with that driven by automotive, right? Automotive is a key variable that will determine the level of growth in that business. But it's not a bad estimate to take a little bit more than four times eight, because eight is the slow quarter, Q4 is this lower quarter and then add some synergies on top of that. We've tried to do that math for you guys and giving that baseline of about 560 before organic growth into next year.

Okay. Thank you for that, Ben. And just one risk I wanted to drill into is whether you see any potential that some of your elect sales in the auto and markets might have been driven by inventory build by your customer? Is that a potential headwind going forward?

It's hard to quantify what's gone into units versus what's waiting to go into units. But the latent demand from the automotive space in the West gives us confidence that there's significant growth potential when the supply chain stabilized that will overcome any potential inventory build.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. We will move next to Bob Koort with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Thank you. Ben, you guys had noted I guess through most of the year your sales into the auto chain weren't reflective of production levels. Should we then think there might be a lag as production comes back? I noticed GM added some shifts -- overtime shifts and talked about supply improving. Was there going to be a little bit of delay to seeing that reflected in your business do you think?

I don't think that there would be a material lag when -- not if but when the auto market comes off of this period of weakness. Our customers have slowed down materially here in the last month and a half and we expect that to persist into the fourth quarter. But we know they're all ready for that market to recover. And some of the outperformance we saw relative to automotive is clearly being driven by other aspects of our industrial business. Our construction related business, our machinery and heavy equipment related business has been posting high double-digit growth on a sequential basis. And that's what's offset some of that automotive pressure. The other thing I I'd note is that content per vehicle is increasing in our industrial solutions business as well as our electronics business. And so, this isn't just a unit story, it's value in excess of units that should allow for us to outperform unit growth when unit growth returns.

Got you. And then -- and the graphics business you guys mentioned particularly North America strength, the omission of talking of Europe is that a function of it's just not as big a business or is there something about your customers in those markets that haven't responded in a similar fashion to North America?

The graphics business is performing very, very well. It had a great quarter on a year-over-year and sequential basis. That business was just better in North America than in Europe, but it wasn't poor in Europe at all. That performance is being driven by new investment from CPG customers and really strong commercial execution. We're winning a lot of business there and we're poised for another year of good growth in graphics into next year.

Great. Thanks for the help.

Thanks Bob.

[Operator Instructions] Today we do ask to allow everyone an opportunity to ask a question that you do limit yourself to one question plus one follow-up question. We'll go next to Kieran de Brun with Mizuho. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning.

Good morning, Kieran.

I just wanted to dial in a little bit more in the quarter. It seems like you took a lot of actions that helped offset some of these supply and logistical headwinds, and you're taking further actions on the raw material side by building inventories into the end of the year. I just -- if this environment persists a little bit longer than we expect, can you just talk about levers in the quarter that you pulled? And maybe any additional levers you can pull to offset this in the near term?

Yes, absolutely. So raw material price inflation and logistics cost inflation were material impact in the quarter, which was expected. We've been taking price over the course of the year. We're not quite caught up from a raw material inflation perspective relative to the price actions we've taken. But we have taken price and you're seeing that through the P&L and we will continue to as necessary to support margins. Logistics costs were a couple million dollars of a headwind sequentially and we expect that to also persist. We haven't taken price relative to logistics as yet. I would note however that our EBITDA margins on an organic basis are up year-over-year over a point and a half. That's been hidden by the pass-through metal impact. So metal price inflation has been staggering this year and so you see that in our reported margins. But excluding the impact of metal we've actually improved our margins year-over-year despite all this inflation. So, we are getting the price that we're trying to take, but we've got a bit more of that to do.

Right. And then just a quick follow-up on the electronic side. I mean, you mentioned the investments that we're seeing from the customer perspective in terms of CapEx, which we should we be thinking about that creating a demand poll maybe in the back half of next year and into 2023? And just how are you positioning yourself to maybe win share as some of these new investments come online?

Yes. So our business has been executing exceptionally well commercially in the electronic space and in our other businesses as well. We have won more business year to date than we won in all of 2020 just as an example. So, we are winning large customer engagements. Our CapEx is higher in part, because we're investing in equipment to support customers new line builds. And so that's what gives us a lot of confidence and conviction not just in the secular trends that are supporting our business, but in our ability to participate disproportionately from them.

Great. Thank you so much.

And we will go next to Jon Tanwanteng with CJS Securities. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning guys. Thank you for taking my questions. Nice quarter and being able to hold the line in the guidance for the year. It's pretty impressive considering what else is going on in the industry right now. My first question is just in your discussions with customers, are they telling you to expect any easing and supply chain constraints as we head into next year? Do you have any kind of visibility at all? Is there any specific commentary that we should be thinking about?

So, I think that customers particularly in the automotive side, were really trying to or were optimistic entering the third quarter that things will get better by the end of the year and clearly that hasn't happened. And so, our customers are dealing with the reality that a recovery in automotive is going to be delayed at least into 2022. In terms of visibility towards that recovery, we don't have a ton. We see the demand. I think we all see the demand when you look at dealer inventories and used car prices. But when that -- when the bottlenecks that are creating the supply issues here will be resolved [Indiscernible].

Okay. Fair enough. And then just on the topic of price increases. Have you been seeing any pushback from customers at all? I know you said, you haven't been able to -- you had pass the logistics costs through. Is there a reason for that? Or is that just something that's down the line and you expect to realize those over the next one or two quarters?

Yes. Taking price is never easy, but we've been effective at doing so. There's a bit of a lag always from the decision to take price to the negotiation with the customer to that price increase actually going through, that lag is a quarter or so. Historically, we've had great surcharges on external logistics. Our internal logistics we've covered ourselves. And so some of the cost increase we've seen is associated with our internal freight, which is something we have decided not to pass on. With regard to other raw material inflation that we're catching up on, we are prepared to take action to support our margins as we have here to date and as you are seeing in our margins structure and our ability to withstand what's been very significant raw material inflation year-to-date.

Okay. Thank you. That helps.

We will take our next question today from Josh Spector with UBS. Your line is open.

Yes. Hey guys. Thanks for taking the question. I guess just first to maybe follow-up on the price cost dynamic and specifically an industrial. So assuming you are getting pricing and if we assume that metals prices and raws kind of stabilize where they are, is there anything you would add to that 360 EBITDA like base for next year for price recapture from price cost headwinds this year?

So I'm trying to understand that question, Josh. Are you saying, is there additional earnings growth from additional price actions that would support a number above 560?

Yes. I guess another way to ask is where would you say pricing is now in industrial? Is that covering -- starting to cover the metals costs? And just trying to think if pricing stays where it is and raw materials stay where they are, is that enough to recover and grow margins absent volumes in that business next year?

I see. So raw material prices have inflated over the course of 2021. And we have a bit more work to do to support the very strong margin we had in the first quarter for example. So, I wouldn't be counting on incremental price to contribute growth over and above that 560. The growth above that 560 is going to be driven by volume and to some extent mix, as our mix is increasing as we move more into EVs. The other thing I'd note, you refer to metal price specifically. We pass through most of our metal price. And so while it has an optical impact on margins, it doesn't have a dollar impact to profitability dollars.

Okay. Fair enough. And just trying to contextualize a electronics year-to-date very strong growth. I don't know if you have the data to say, what you think unit growth was underlying your volume growth? And what your outperformance has been there year to date? And is the driver of that new wins or more content penetration? And does that rate change or that outperformance rate change when we start to think about 2022 better or worse?

Sure. So the best indicator I would say for our electronics business is printed circuit boards volume growth. Circuit board expectations for 2021 are up from call it high single digits to 14%, 15% and we're growing in excess of that clearly, which just is an indicator of outperformance. As we look at what the key indicators are in 2022, we see -- we expect handset unit growth. We expect significantly more 5G handsets. So there's more content per unit. And we expect to continue to outperform by several points given our commercial execution. So we got a lot of conviction in underlying growth and our ability to outperform.

Okay. Thank you.

And we will go next to Chris Kapsch with Loop Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Yes, good morning. Just a follow-up question about your electronics business and your formal comments and I guess response to another question about the new business wins addressing the printed circuit board space and ecosystem. You mentioned I guess a good amount of new business and being higher on a year-over-year basis, year-to-date. Can you just talk about the cadence of this activity on a sequential basis as the level of quoting activity been steady, is it improving. What's going on sequential basis?

Yes. So the seasonality we see through the top line is also reflected in the seasonality we see in terms of customer engagement. And so, customers are seeking RFPs and doing technology roadmap exchanges more towards the beginning of the year in advance of platform launches towards the tail end. So some of that commercial activity has slowed down. But that's what we would have expected at this point through the year. And so, we feel good that we built in growth based on our wins in the period to date for next year and beyond.

Okay. And just as a follow-up. Do you think you're -- it sounds like your inclination is that you're gaining share is based on these new account specifications or wins or turnkey system specifications. Can you just talk about that? And is there any change in the competitive behavior, I guess, with your key competitor there in the process of being acquired? Thank you

Sure. Thanks Chris. So for starters from an industry perspective there's much more growth in the high end, higher technology, circuit board space than there is in the lower end. So just naturally by virtue of diverging growth rates the higher end is where the share gains are occurring or the higher end participants are growing share and we're one of those. So we would expect our share to grow just organically by virtue of industry dynamics. That said, we are getting traction in markets that we have underpenetrated that we're strategically investing behind and we've made it very clear to the industry that we are open for business and investing aggressively behind our business, and very, very focused on that. And so, we feel like we've got an opportunity to take some share. And the calculation of share takes a little while and is done in hindsight. But data points do seem positive in that regard.

That's helpful color. Thank you.

We will move now to Duffy Fischer with Barclays. Your line is open.

Yes. Good morning, Ben.

Good morning, Duffy.

Just a question around the contractual pass-through on the metal and maybe a few of the other raw materials that are contractual. Because they've moved so much can you help us size this year within your COGs, how much do you think is going to be COGs that have contractually moved with price versus those you would actually physically have to go out and try to get price to offset?

Yes. It's a good question, Duffy. So, we report the pass-through metals in our assembly business at $110 million in the quarter. We have other metals that are pass-through palladium gold other precious metals like that that aren't captured in that -- in what we report. So all together it's several hundred million dollars of metal that we're passing through. And I would have ballpark, said, there's been inflation of about $200 million in that basket, whereas the balance of our COGs are not contractually pass-through and we've been pursuing price in each of our businesses and successful in getting price in each of our businesses to offset where those raw materials have inflated.

Great. Thanks. And then, when you look at your auto business next year, obviously, you have an idea kind of wins. You have an idea, EV, hybrid, stuff like that. How much faster do you think you can grow volume than the market next year? And again, let's say that number is 3% faster. Does that change whether autos are up 5% or down 5%? Or is that really kind of a linear add-on as we go forward?

Yes. A difficult question to answer. But about 25% of our business is automotive oriented that's captured in both the industrial surface treatment business and in our electronics business. And the reason that we have confidence we can outperform units in auto is because we're seeing increasing content per vehicle in both of those businesses with significantly more content in an e-vehicle versus an internal combustion engine. So one and a half, two times the content on an electric vehicle versus an internal combustion vehicle. And over the long term our expectation is that content per ICE vehicle grows 2%, 3% faster than unit growth. So depending on e-vehicle penetration, you could see in excess of 3% outperformance to units. And I don't see a big difference if units are up 2% or 5% for example or more in that equation. I think the biggest variable is EV penetration out of the unit growth.

Perfect. Thank you guys.

Thanks Duffy.

And we will take our final question today from Angel Castillo with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Angel Castillo, your line is open. Please check the mute function on your phone.

Hi. Can you hear me?

Yes.

Sorry about that. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. So just wanted to circle back on the safety stock discussion. One, could you give us a little bit more color as to what is kind of typical inventory days and maybe where have you kind of moved up to? And two, as we think about you mentioned I think next year continuing -- auto safety stock continuing to be as part of the base. Do you need to build more though? Or are we kind of at the right level? And it's just about kind of maintaining this higher safety level?

Yes. Thanks for the question. This is Carey. Normally, in our business, we see inventory days between the mid to high 60s getting closer to 70, depending on the quarter. We actually haven't creeped up that much. I think we're a few days higher than we were if we look at our average over the course of several years. We think year to date we've built something like 40 or 50 worth of safety stocks. We intentionally did that. We think that's the right thing to do to support our customers. It's what's supporting the top line growth. And obviously, we think that that inventory will be easily sellable into next year and beyond. As we think about the rest of the year, we're anticipating a small release of working capital to deliver the free cash flow that we've guided to, that's really more driven by the sales, sequential sales expectations than it is anything it became at least of safety stocks. For next year, I would expect when we see the supply chain constraints reduce that safety stock will release and we should see a much better conversion to free cash flow from EBITDA next year.

Understood. That's very helpful. And then in terms of growth next year. So, that was very helpful. Thank you for providing the base that we should think about. Is we've kind of contemplate that within kind of the broader scope of your organic growth trajectory that you've outlined in the past investor days, I think it was roughly 4%. Could you give us kind of guardrails as we think about 2022? I know it's early. But what kind of gets you to be above that or below that? And kind of is that the right way to think about 2022 from our organic basis?

Sure. So the basis is the EBITDA before the synergies. We would expect our electronics business to grow in excess of its stable long term rate, just given -- the stable long term rate we communicated at our prior Investor Day given the inflection we've seen from the secular trends that are driving that business really gaining traction in the past two years, the bigger variable of the automotive industry and when it begins to recover. If it recovers towards the first half of the year, you could see significant outperformance relative to that long term target from the automotive portion of the business. And if this recovery is delayed and supply chain issues persist, you can't count on significant growth from that part of the business. So, automotive is going to be the biggest variable as to the magnitude of outperformance relative to that long term growth rate.

Thank you.

Thanks, Angel.

And this does conclude our Q&A session for today. I will turn the call back for any additional or closing remarks.

Thanks very much, everybody for joining. We look forward to seeing and speaking with you in the days and weeks to come. Have a good day.

This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.