Good day, and welcome to the Elastic N.V. First Quarter Fiscal 2026 Earnings Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Eric Prengel, Global Vice President of Finance. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining us on today's conference call to discuss Elastic's first quarter fiscal 2026 Financial Results. My name is Eric Prengel, Global Vice President of Finance. On the call, we have Ash Kulkarni, Chief Executive Officer; and Navam Welihinda, Chief Financial Officer. Following their prepared remarks, we will take questions. Our press release was issued today after market close and is posted on our website. Slides, which are supplemental to the call, can also be found on the Elastic Investor Relations website at ir.elastic.co. Our discussion will include forward-looking statements, which may include predictions, estimates, our expectations regarding the demand for our products and solutions and our future revenue and other information. These forward-looking statements are based on factors currently known to us, speak only as of the date of this call and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements unless required by law. Please refer to the risks and uncertainties included in the press release that we issued earlier today, included in the slides posted on the Investor Relations website and those more fully described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Disclosures regarding non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations with the most comparable GAAP measures can be found in the press release and slides. Unless specifically noted otherwise, all results and comparisons are on a fiscal year-over- year basis. The webcast replay of this call will be available on our company website under the Investor Relations link. Our second quarter fiscal 2026 quiet period begins at the close of business on Friday, October 17. We will be participating in Citi's Global TMT Conference on September 4, the Goldman Sachs Communacopia and Technology Conference on September 8 and the Piper Sandler Growth Frontiers Conference on September 11. Finally, Elastic will host a Financial Analyst Day in combination with our New York City ElasticON event on October 9, and we hope many of you will join us in person. With that, I'll turn it over to Ash.

Thank you, Eric, and thank you all for joining us today. Elastic had an excellent Q1 and a strong start to the fiscal year, delivering 20% revenue growth for the first quarter, surpassing the high end of our guidance. Sales-led subscription revenue, calculated as subscription revenue, excluding monthly Elastic Cloud, grew by 22% and was driven by strength in both our cloud and self-managed offerings. Our growth was supported by the ongoing demand for our highly differentiated search AI platform and our sales team's solid execution. The inherent leverage in our business model and our disciplined execution continue to fuel our profitability, resulting in a non-GAAP operating margin of 16%. We ended the quarter with more than 1,550 customers spending over $100,000 as enterprises continue to choose Elastic for their search, observability and security needs. Amidst today's rapidly changing global landscape and with AI now clearly shaping technology decisions, our Q1 performance directly demonstrates the value that the Elasticsearch AI platform delivers to customers. Market demand for our solutions has strengthened, contributing to our overall success this quarter. Our strong market position is further deepened by the operational strength of our sales team with the territory changes we made now fully benefiting our execution. Our go-to-market momentum is building across the board. In the U.S. public sector, we are seeing signs of stabilization. In U.S. public sector win from the quarter, an intelligence agency adopted Elasticsearch and Observability for their AI-powered enterprise services, consolidating on to Elastic due to our reputation as a trusted mission partner and owing to the strength of our AI capabilities. Our strategic agreement with the U.S. General Services Administration, or GSA, which we signed in Q1 and ongoing progress on FedRAMP high certification for Elastic Cloud are helping build positive momentum. Both initiatives are boosting…

Thank you, Ash. Q1 was an excellent quarter with solid execution across the business. We exceeded the revenue and profitability metrics we set out to achieve, and our go-to-market team is executing well on all fronts. Our Q1 results provided a promising start to the year. This performance positioned Elastic to enter Q2 and the remainder of fiscal 2026 from a position of strength. Our total revenue in the first quarter was $415 million. We grew 20% as reported and 18% on a constant currency basis. Our sales- led subscription revenue, calculated as subscription revenue, excluding monthly Elastic Cloud, was $339 million, growing 22% as reported and 20% on a constant currency basis. Q1 '26 marked the fourth consecutive quarter of strong performance since we made the sales segmentation changes last year. Our sales-led subscription revenue grew 22% in Q2 '25, 18% in Q3 '25, 19% in Q4 '25 and now 22% this quarter. These consistent results demonstrate the durability of our team's execution. The revenue performance we saw this quarter was broad-based across both our cloud and self-managed environments. We saw strong customer commitments with key wins across all our solution areas. Both generative AI and platform consolidation continue to be powerful tailwinds benefiting search, observability and security. As Ash mentioned, we saw competitive success in security with 1/3 of new and expansion deals in security coming from replacing an incumbent solution. Our traction is further supported by new product releases, including our Elastic AI SOC Engine or EASE, which uses AI to enhance threat detection. As you heard from Ash, our team continued to operate effectively in all areas, and we saw strength across all our geos. In the U.S. public sector, we're seeing stabilization and the team is fully primed to execute. Even with ongoing shifts in…

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Matt Hedberg with RBC Capital Markets.

Congrats on the results. Really, really good to see early in the fiscal year. I guess maybe the first one for you, Ash. It was really good to hear about AI relevance with Elastic Cloud and even the progress on serverless thus far. I guess I'm wondering, is there a way to think about what customers -- the uplift in customer spend is when they start to think about growing usage of Elastic to support AI. It really does feel like you guys are becoming a bit of a center of gravity for that. But any way to kind of think about what this is doing to customer spend or usage and maybe it becomes even more evident with serverless?

Yes, Matt, thanks for the question. And like you said, our gen AI momentum is something that we feel really, really good about. The customer adoption has been strong. 2,200 customers in Elastic Cloud now using us for gen AI use cases. What we are seeing is as customers start to use us for all of these AI applications, these workloads tend to be more compute-intensive. And that obviously means that the growth sort of helps. And when we've described it as a tailwind, that's really what it is. Now the extent to which that growth manifests itself, the workload cost depends upon the kind of data, depends upon the kind of use case because these AI computations tend to take up more CPU, tend to take up more memory. And as you know, our consumption model is biased towards that. So it's hard to give a precise number, but what we can say is that there is definitely an improvement in sort of the overall consumption that we see as customers use us for AI. Now let me repeat that fundamentally, we are still early in the AI journey. So we are seeing some contribution from AI, but we are very early, and I see a long path here, where by being the core foundation for AI for our customers as they are making multiyear decisions here, this is going to be a tailwind for us for many years to come.

Really good to hear. And then maybe just a quick one for Navam. You mentioned the price -- the May price increase, which is now reflected in the guide. Is there any way that you could help us think about how that's benefiting the year? Just any sort of quantification there would be helpful.

Sure thing. Thanks, Matt. So first of all, just starting with Q1, you look at the performance, it was a broad-based overperformance across consumption and across commitments from both our cloud customers and our self-managed customers. When you think about our normal course of business from time to time, we do price increases, and we've done one last year for self-managed. We did one this year for self-managed and cloud. The increase in Q1 was mostly related to consumption performance and the goodness of our business. But we did have a benefit from the price increase. And the way you should think about it is a price increase lifts the floor year-over-year. So you get a benefit year- over-year as you think about the growth from year-over-year, but the majority comes from performance rather than price increase. And then quarter-over-quarter, you'd see a more muted effect of prices as you've now got a floor that you will grow from. So that's how I think about the price increase. Overall, Q1 was, like I said, broad-based from a performance perspective and macro was in a much better spot than where we had originally assumed. So feeling good about the year.

The next question comes from Koji Ikeda with Bank of America Securities.

This is George McGreen on for Koji. I really appreciate it. I have one -- I wanted to ask on the growth mix. Just understanding, obviously, there's a lot of momentum with gen AI in search. But if you could maybe stack rank or give us a framework to think about how growth across the business is kind of playing out in observability and security as well?

Yes, George, thanks for the question. So this was a really strong quarter with a very broad performance strength that we saw across all solution areas. Search, driven by gen AI continues to be a very strong tailwind for us. But this quarter, we also saw security and the platform consolidation motion that we've been describing work very, very nicely for us. I think one of the stats that I talked about was the fact that 1/3 of the business in security this quarter came from competitive displacements. And these deals take some time to build, but we are starting to see that momentum. And this is primarily because customers are looking to consolidate onto platforms that tend to see security and observability as a data problem. And we've always done that incredibly well. And as the amount of data, the complexity of data is growing as it's becoming more and more important to use AI techniques to try and drive automation, even in security and observability, we are seeing our ability to compete and take share really improve, and that's something that we see as a very exciting thing for the future.

Appreciate it. And if I could ask another question here. Navam, since you joined, how would you describe maybe the predictability of the model today versus when you joined? Has it changed much? And if so, why?

Yes. Now I'm about 2 quarters in since I joined. I think the big learning for me is on the sales-led subscription side. And I think I mentioned this during my prepared remarks. The execution there and the durability of execution was very strong, right? We had 22% growth a year ago, followed by 18%, 19% and 22% again this year. This is a testament to the consistency of growth we're seeing from our sales-led motion across both cloud and self-managed. So I'd say that the underlying execution from the team remains very good and very, very -- and predictable on the sales-led side. We're a consumption business, and that's the one place where there is a little bit of unpredictability on what could happen on a quarter-over- quarter basis. Overall, we had a good quarter in Q1 and given what we expected. So I feel like we have more data now than we did a quarter ago.

The next question comes from Rob Owens with Piper Sandler.

I really want to drill down on the success that you're seeing on the security front. I think you said 1/3 of it was coming from competitive displacements. And obviously, we're seeing a lot of success, I think, across the board from vendors that are competing for this next-generation SIEM opportunity. So I guess relative to the unlock that happened this quarter, was there anything in particular that drove that momentum? Was it more just how the pipeline set up? And as we look forward, maybe what are some of the different key ingredients to further unlock customers that have been with some of those legacy vendors for some time?

Yes, that's a great question. And what's driving that unlock is really a greater and greater appreciation for the fact that security really is a data problem. In the modern landscape today, with attacks getting more and more sophisticated, it is becoming incredibly important to make sure that you're bringing in all of the data, all of the security-related signals, analyzing all of them, correlating across all of them and then using AI automation to really try and make it easier for the SOC analysts to identify what the issues might be. And the way we think about it is you miss 100% of the threats and attacks in the data that you don't see. And for that reason, we've always had this mentality of thinking of security from a data-first perspective. Our back end is designed for that. Our AI capabilities are designed for that. And as customers are appreciating this, we are seeing them make multiyear decisions to consolidate onto our platform and that's driving the momentum. And we are really leaning in. So one of the announcements that we made, the Elastic Security, the AI SOC Engine or EASE, as we call it. What it lets you do is even if you're using an incumbent different SIEM solution, it allows you to take all of the alerts that might be generated in that solution and then use our AI capabilities to identify attacks within that alert data, which is incredibly powerful because what that means is you don't have to change your current infrastructure. You can use Elastic on top of it to get significantly more incremental value, and that becomes a stepping stone sort of an on-ramp for customers to then eventually displace, completely take out their existing incumbent and move completely to our solution. So it's things like that, that we've been working on that give me a lot of confidence on how this is going to progress in the coming years.

The next question comes from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays.

Perfect. Congrats from me as well. It's nice to see the cloud reacceleration, but the bigger upside in my model was actually on self- service. Can you speak to the factors there that drove that reacceleration of growth and what drove that? Was that like you mentioned several times, broad-based, so I take broad-based, but like still there was a very decent step-up on the growth rate there.

Yes. Thank you, Raimo. I'll take that. Just a reiteration that this is the second quarter now where we had very strong self-managed growth. And the combination of self-managed growth and cloud growth is what we are going for to reinforce our subscription -- sales- led subscription revenue, right? That's the core piece that the company is focused on to drive growth. So the growth in self-managed this quarter was truly, as I mentioned, broad-based. When you think about where it came from geographically, where it came from the solutions, it pretty much most of the -- all the geographies and solutions contributed to the self-managed cloud. And that's sort of the main benefit of it.

Sorry, I don't know if you were also referring to self-service cloud or our monthly cloud business, I think that, as you know, it's generally been trending around the same way. But to Navam's point, our focus really is on the sales-led subscription revenue, which we are very excited about.

Yes. Okay. And then Ash, one follow-up is like all the other vendors, like a lot of the other vendors struggling around AI with kind of how to price it properly, et cetera. But you guys have been on consumption for a long time. Like how does that help you at the moment in customer conversations and driving that AI message from you guys forward? Congrats again.

Thank you. So the reason why consumption as a metric works incredibly well in AI is fundamentally because it makes it very easy for customers to sort of connect the dots between their usage of our platform and the value that they're getting out of it. So as opposed to a per-user price or something that's a flat fee, this really is completely dependent on how much of the AI functionality they use. And from our experience, that's been something that customers really like. As their usage grows, as they get more value from the usage of the platform, they need to pay more and they're more than happy to pay more. And so we feel that we've got exactly the right mix when it comes to the pricing model. And you can see some of that in terms of just the adoption and the growth that we are seeing.

The next question comes from Mike Cikos with Needham & Co.

Congrats on the strong quarter here. The first question I wanted to ask was for Ash. And coming back, again, I think people are hanging on the 1/3 of the new and expansion wins in security were competitive displacements. But if I could try to drive it that slightly differently. I think all of us are aware of the industry M&A that's out there. You're also talking about the sustained execution on the go-to-market front. So I wanted to ask, what is the thought around how durable these competitive displacements are when thinking about what's taking place on the security front? I think about the amount of time that these deals might be sitting in your pipeline, they might mature. What is the durability for these continuing to convert on a go-forward basis from where we sit today?

Yes, that's a great question. And generally, what I'd say is that in the last few years, we've been seeing a constant, steady drumbeat, and it's been growing of customers that are really looking for a change from their incumbent solutions. Most of the incumbent solutions that have been around really thought about SIEM as sort of just the dashboards and the alerts. They didn't think about the effort that is involved in automating the job of the SOC analyst and things that need to be done to really make it easier to spot the attacks as opposed to just the alerts. And for that reason, we are seeing sort of a secular shift and a migration onto what I would describe as the next generation of SIEM platforms and SIEM technologies that tend to have a bias towards treating security as a data problem. So we are seeing more and more of these conversations happening. That's the reason why we introduced capabilities like attack discovery. We introduced capabilities like automatic import, which make it easier for people to migrate their workflows over on to Elastic. And most recently, we introduced our Elastic Security AI SOC engine, so you can get started by using our AI functionality on top of your existing SIEM and making that sort of an easy on-ramp to eventually replace your SIEM provider. We feel very good about this being a tailwind for us for many years to come. And I see this as a really good ongoing motion, and our sales team is leaning into it.

Terrific. And for the follow-up here, just wanted to cycle back to the net expansion rate for a second. Great to hear in Q1 how you guys outperformed across both consumption and commitments, right? I guess, can you help us think about what's embedded in the guide today for how net expansion is expected to play out over the rest of the year? Are we still assuming relatively stable net expansion? Or are we starting to get an inkling that this might actually begin picking up?

Yes. Thanks for the question, Mike. So look, we had a good start to the year, a great Q1 with going in macro was in a better position than what we thought in the beginning of the year when we issued our first guidance. Consumption was strong and the commitments were strong from our customers. So overall, as you think about where those commitments come from, a lot of it comes from existing customers as they expand usage from us, and that's driven by our net expansion rate. We don't guide to future net expansion. But as we think about the full year, what we've baked in is more visibility into the year and a better macro situation and also the quarter-over-quarter impacts of price as well as the year-over-year impacts of price have been baked into the guide. We felt good about performance, which is what led to the raise for the full year, and we expect net expansion to perform well over the next several quarters as well.

The next question comes from Sanjit Singh with Morgan Stanley.

Congrats on the strong start to the fiscal year. Ash, I wanted to get some help in terms of understanding the impact on some of your most exciting opportunities. And I want to sort of compare and contrast the sort of AI search opportunity, which you guys have been very clear, right? Like we've come from POC and evals, initial applications into production and then you have to sort of get -- increase the penetration rate in terms of a customer's overall application real estate to do that long multiyear journey. You guys have been very clear about that. When it comes to the SIEM opportunity, though, is the right way to think about it because it's a more established category, because there's a lot of brownfield replacement opportunities. Can that be a more immediate impact on growth in self-managed and cloud growth? I just would love to get your comments on doing the -- compare and contrast between those 2 specific opportunities.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Sanjit. So the way to think about displacements that happen, whether it's in security or observability, whenever somebody consolidates onto our platform, the first thing to keep in mind is that they have to migrate those workflows over. So typically, that takes a little bit of time. The fastest migrations that we've seen happen within a quarter, the longest that we've seen take multiple quarters just because there's actual engineering work involved in moving all of those data streams over. But like you said, these are better understood techniques and these are better understood templates for that. So we have invested a fair bit both from the product side. I talked about automatic import, but also from our services team that has experience and expertise doing these kinds of migrations. I think the most important thing to think about, though, is we are seeing ourselves as a beneficiary of this wave of migrations and sort of moving to the next generation of SIEM that's happening within the broad market. And our goal is to take as much of that share as possible. And so I don't see this as just a onetime thing, but this is, I believe, something that we should benefit from for not just several quarters, but several years to come.

That's great color. I had a question on just the federal business, and that was a source of weakness last quarter. It sounds like things are stabilizing. As Fed comes into its fiscal year-end, what are some of the assumptions that you're baking in for fiscal Q2 and the government's fiscal year-end coming up next quarter?

Maybe let me just touch upon that, and then I'll ask Navam to add to it. The first thing I'd say is we are definitely seeing sort of stabilization in the U.S. public sector. 6 months ago, what we saw was with the new administration settling in with Dodge and everything, like there was a lot of movement. The environment was very dynamic. That has settled. It's a much more stable environment, and our sales team knows how to execute very well within that environment, especially given that the value that we offer for our platform is incredibly high, and it's very well received by our customers in the public sector. So we are really excited about that. I will say that Q2 has typically -- like we, even in past years, have not seen like a big federal flush or anything of that sort. So from a public sector standpoint, Q2 hasn't necessarily been sort of an outlying quarter for us. So just keep that in mind. But let me -- I don't know if Navam, you have anything else to add to that.

No, I think Ash got most of my points. But when we gave our initial guide in May, there was a lot of uncertainty around what would happen with the U.S. public sector, specifically the civilian agencies, would it expand to more of the public sector and the rest of sort of the geos. It clearly did not occur. And the U.S. public sector, while there is some ongoing impacts, have mostly stabilized. And as Ash said, our team is executing well there, and our products are a good fit for what they're trying to achieve. So we've factored that into our second quarter guide. And as Ash mentioned, there's no real flush that we're factoring in there, and that's not something we'd expect.

The next question comes from Kash Rangan with Goldman Sachs.

I'll add my congrats on the quarter. It looks like everything is coming back together for you guys, just the way you would like it. And pardon me, Ash, if this feels like a relax from a few years ago, but I would ask you this, that listen to the call, there is an AI search aspect to it. There's a security aspect to it. There's an observability aspect to it. What is it that makes Elastic tick at the end of the day? What is the message to your customer base? Like what is the unifying thread that makes this machine a predictable growth machine that is ready for the next 4 to 5 years?

That's a great question, Kash, and that's the kind of Redux question that I always appreciate. Fundamentally, we think of ourselves as a search AI company. And like I've described in the past, our secret sauce is our ability to take in any and all kinds of data, especially messy unstructured data and really get you the most correct, the most relevant information out of it. And as we've described in the context of AI, as you think about companies, enterprises, government agencies, what have you, building agentic applications, the criticality of getting the context right is so high, especially as you are building more and more sophisticated agents and that search relevance is absolutely critical. And we are seeing that across the board. And it's not just about having a vector database, it's about so much more than that. So the way we think about our role in this ecosystem is to be that data retrieval and context engineering platform, making it possible to get exactly the accurate context in real time to these large language models. That's helping us in our search business. But if you then think about security and you think about observability, you really recognize that these are fundamentally at the end of the day, data problems. You're dealing with complex logs, you're dealing with complex traces. Application logs are incredibly messy. And if you have to analyze them at scale in real time using AI, we have the best platform for that. So for us, that core search AI piece is the secret sauce. That's what's going to continue to drive our progress and our growth. And that's why I'm very confident in the long-term growth and strength of our business.

Our next question comes from Howard Ma with Guggenheim Securities.

Great. Excellent quarter, guys. I guess building on Kash's question on use cases, when you analyze your quarterly performance by use case, did growth in search continue to accelerate because I believe that's been the trend. And part 2 is, as gen AI use cases become more mature, they also require more data to be monitored. So is that leading to more observability cross-sell or not necessarily?

Yes. So that's a great question. So what I'd say is that our search business continues to be incredibly strong because of the gen AI tailwinds. And that's what's so exciting about what's happening here. Like I said, this quarter, we also saw a lot of platform consolidation. And in security, I gave some of the examples. Because at the end of the day, our strength in AI is helping us compete better and take more share in observability and security. And that's the nice part about it. So fundamentally, AI expands the TAM for our search business. And in the other areas, it allows us to compete better. Now to your point about what's happening overall in the market, we absolutely see that more and more applications, especially these AI-centric applications are being built. But we are still in the early days. You take any enterprise, you're talking about a handful or at most dozens of applications and you compare that to the total application landscape that exists in any organization, it's in the hundreds of thousands. So we are still in the early days. AI has a lot of legs ahead of it. I think this is a multiyear journey where there is a lot of excitement for the future. And the fact that we are getting baked in into the platform, into the infrastructure where our customers are using us as this core context engine just makes me feel very good about the long-term prospects for our business.

Great. And as a follow-up, you've made some significant go-to-market improvements over the last year. It's a question for Navam. So Navam, you were not at Elastic this time last year, obviously, but when you look at your data on key metrics like sales capacity and productivity and coverage ratios, the number of large deals in the pipeline, so things like that, I'm curious how you would characterize your optimism for the rest of the year versus the stellar quarter you just posted.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Howard. So like I said, I feel good about the year. And the reason I feel good about the year is about the durability of our team's execution. And that is reinforced by the underlying data we're seeing in terms of how the sales team has been being able to perform from a subscription revenue less -- sorry, a sales-led subscription revenue perspective. And the reason they're able to do that is they've had strong performance from a productivity perspective and our capacity additions are working. So that's sort of the underlying drivers as to why our sales-led growth has been durable. And we've had a great start of the year, and I feel optimistic about the rest of the year.

The next question comes from Tyler Radke with Citi.

You saw pretty good current RPO bookings this quarter, and you also talked about some pretty impressive $1 million customer adds on AI. Can you just talk about the use cases you're seeing and sort of what drove that step-up versus the last couple of quarters?

Yes. Fundamentally, what we are seeing is that our customers are making meaningful commitments to us, Tyler. I think that sales-led motion, as Navam mentioned, has been continuing to do well. On the AI side, it's an area that we've been focused on to make sure that our largest customers, our highest propensity to grow customers are really adopting our AI technology. And as we've been driving that, you are seeing some of this momentum. So from my perspective, like my goal is to make sure that every single one of our customers, existing customers and new customers, we lead with our AI functionality. We are getting better and better at it. And my belief is that as more of our customers adopt, as they build more complex applications, these complex applications don't have just one call to a vector database, but they have like multiple different interactions. There are multiple moments where they have to do retrieval and context engineering and each of those drives consumption, as you know. So for our consumption-based model, the more we are embedded into every one of their AI applications, the better the traction that we see, and that's what we are focused on. That's what we are starting to see.

Great. And a follow-up on the pricing side. I think based on the list price that we saw out there, it looked like the monthly cloud price went up by about 5%. Was that similar across the rest of the business? I think there was price increases on the annual as well as the self-managed side of the equation.

Yes. So we did a price increase at the beginning of the year. Tyler, as you know, our business model is such that we don't sell discrete products. So for us, the way as we add more and more functionality from time to time, we will increase our prices. Just to remind you, we did something similar for our self-managed products last year. We had talked about it at the beginning of last year, and we also did a price increase at the beginning of this year, like you mentioned. So for us, this is just the normal course of business to do these from time to time, but it was across both cloud and self-managed.

The next question comes from Brian Essex with JPMorgan. The next question comes from Brian Essex with JPMorgan.

Congratulations from me on the strong results. Maybe one for you, Ash. We're hearing, particularly on the security side, the focus on AI and leveraging enhanced visibility, real-time detection on streaming data, which I think you addressed. But would love to -- what we're also hearing is a focus on more efficient data ingestion, leveraging AI and storage of -- more efficient storage of data. And I'm wondering, are you seeing that at all competitively and how you might be positioned to address that need?

Yes. I mean we have been driving that for many years, right? So one of our greatest strengths is our ability to ingest in massive amounts of data at scale and then store that data incredibly efficiently. So several years ago, we introduced capabilities that allow us to take advantage of object storage, really, really cheap storage and through life cycle management sort of manage how much data you retain on disk versus how much you store in object storage and really bring down the costs of both data storage and data analysis. That's been one of the biggest drivers for customers to move on to our platform because they see that kind of efficiency gain and that efficiency improvement. Even 2 quarters ago, we introduced a capability called LogsDB that allows you to do even more aggressive data compression and management of log data to store -- to bring down the cost of what it takes to store log data. And these kinds of capabilities are a constant stream of innovations from us. So it's been a reason why we keep winning, and we are not going to stop on this area. Like we -- my firm belief is that given the rate at which data grows, continuing to drive these kinds of innovations is going to be a reason why we'll continue to win.

The next question comes from Jake Roberge with William Blair.

Just wanted to follow up on the go-to-market front. You talked about execution improving and the changes starting to bear more fruit. Just in terms of the go forward, where do you see the largest opportunities remaining? And what inning do you feel like we're in with that overall transition?

Yes. I mean maybe I'll address this and then Navam might want to add to it. From our perspective, there is so much opportunity in the enterprise and mid-market segment where our sales teams are focused. The changes in territory alignment that we made, segmentation that we made a little over a year ago, what they were all about was to have our teams more focused on the enterprise and strategic segment and then to go after greenfield territories more effectively. And we are really starting to see the benefits of that. Those are the kinds of changes that are really, really important as you get from $1 million in revenue to $2 million and $3 million and so on. And now we are starting to see the benefit. So we've got a long ways to go. Like I grew up in India, so not much of a baseball player. But what I'd say is that we have the ability to build a true generational company here, keep driving strong growth for many years to come. And our current sales model, our current sales segmentation gives us the ability to continue to do that.

Yes. And I would add to that. I mean we are playing in exceptionally large TAM markets in observability, security and search. And we're just starting to see AI tailwinds that are taking root in those markets, right? So to Ash's point, hard to put an inning on it, but it is early days in the journey.

Okay. That's helpful. And then I know it's still early, but can you talk about the early feedback you've gotten for the new serverless solutions and just how that migration process has been progressing this year?

Yes. So we obviously have internal milestones that we set for ourselves, and we have been running ahead of those milestones. So that makes me feel really good. The early feedback in terms of the product itself has been really good. Now where we are is, I'll remind everybody, still pretty early in the overall movement here when it comes to serverless. We are now GA in all 3 hyperscalers, but the total data center footprint that we have for serverless is still relatively small compared to our cloud -- Elastic Cloud hosted. Footprint and our goal through this fiscal year is to do the build-out of our serverless and make it available in all the data centers and the majority of the data centers where we do cloud business today. So as we do that, you will -- we continue -- we expect to continue to see more and more adoption of serverless because customers prefer to have their data in local data centers, if you will. And in the coming years, I'm very confident that serverless is going to be the primary way in which our customers use Elastic Cloud.

The next question comes from Brent Thill with Jefferies.

Navam, just on the guide, 20% growth in Q1 and guiding the below mid-teen growth or mid-teen growth for the year. I guess that drop-off in the growth, I guess, what are you factoring in? Is it -- are there other factors that you're unclear about that you're not putting in? Or is it more conservatism? I'm just trying to bridge the great start to the tail off in the growth throughout the year.

Yes, Brent, here's how I would consume the guide. It was a great start to the year. We had -- coming into the year, we've laid out the assumptions around the dynamics of macro that we baked into the guide, which led to the low end and the high end of the guide that we gave the last quarter. Clearly, we are in a much more stable macro environment. While it's still -- while there's still a complex environment out there, it is -- it feels much more stable than we anticipated compared to Q1. And you add to that, that there was a broad-based good execution-led Q1 number that came to us this last quarter. So overall, we beat the Q1 number by a good amount, and we raised the full year. And that raise is meant to signify the better position we're in and the more confidence that we have in the year.

Okay. Great. And Ash, maybe I'm mistaken this, but you seem to be pretty excited about the security business. You mentioned it many times. I guess was there something in the quarter that triggered in terms of breadth of transactions, some big deals was there something that maybe -- or maybe I'm misreading this in reading into the number of times you mentioned security too much, but just curious if you could pull that thread.

I wouldn't call out -- obviously, in any given quarter, there are -- the deal flow, there might be more deals in one solution area versus another. That kind of happens from quarter-to-quarter. What I'd say is that my enthusiasm in security has been high for a while now. We've been seeing a lot of traction with customers moving on to our platform, consolidating onto our platform. We've been doing competitive displacements for some time. One of the things to be aware of is competitive displacements like these deals take time. It's not a 1- to 2-quarter motion, it typically takes several quarters. But that's also why we've been investing in capabilities like automatic import. We recently announced our AI SOC engine that can be used on top of other SIEM products. So we are doing a lot to make it easier for customers to make that migration journey as easy as possible. So I expect that the momentum that we are seeing on the security side is one that will continue to build over time. And I feel really, really good about it. And if there was just a higher count this quarter, it was just because I'm truly, truly excited about the business across the board.

Our last question comes from Patrick Colville with Scotiabank.

I guess I just want to circle back to the price increase because in our field work heading into the quarter, what we were picking up was it was about a 5% price increase across cloud and self-managed. And so I guess, is that quantum roughly right? Does it apply to all customers? And if we exclude the price increase, is that like to work out an underlying number, is that logic correct? Or should we not be thinking about the business that way?

Yes. I'd start off by sort of thinking about the business slightly differently, which is from time to time, the business increases prices. This is something we did last year, and it's somewhat ordinary course of business as we add more features to our product. And to Ash's point earlier, we don't have distinct SKUs. We just add more functionality to the product, and that leads to a more valuable product to our customers. And we reflect that by from time to time evaluating prices and increasing as necessary. There's discounting that factors in as well. So you can't really say, hey, it was an x percent increase across the board on every customer. But roughly, that quantum would be on the rough order of magnitude accurate as you portray it. Now how it relates to the performance, as you think about it is price increases offer a durable baseline that you grow from. So as you go from 1 year to the next, you're almost -- you're lifting that baseline that you'll grow from there. So you'll see a year-over-year benefit. But quarter-over-quarter, you're just going to see a normal benefit and not something that's related to prices. So that's how you should think about price increases. The Q1 performance, like I said, was broad-based. So while we did have benefits to price increase and price increase is something we do from time to time, a lot of the performance -- in fact, the majority of the performance came from good solid execution and good consumption from our customers.

Congrats on a strong start to fiscal first quarter.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Ash Kulkarni for any closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Thank you and thank you all for joining us today. I'm extremely proud of our excellent results and more excited than ever about the opportunity ahead as we build a generational company. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.