Let me add by saying that obviously, for us, we would pay more attention to return of equity, return of asset, earnings per share growth, et cetera. Efficiency is one of the components that we are obviously have it available to share with the public, it's not for me as a high priority. Let me put it this way. The reason I say this is that, while we are growing, we'll continue to expand into other product and fee revenues. And when you change the business model gradually, East West would never do anything dramatically. So you don't have to worry about that. That's why you see our consistent high performance year in, year out, quarter-after-quarter, record-breaking after record-breaking. So you wouldn't have to worry about suddenly we go pivot to a direction that's shocking everybody. But while we are not going to that direction, you may notice that we keep it, calling out these record fee income, wealth management, record fee incomes for cash management fee income, foreign exchange, et cetera., et cetera., right. Is that we will continue to build our capabilities, our talents and continue to acquire more clients that will actually utilize these products that generate fee income for us. While we're we doing that, I think the expense ratio will be different than a predominantly loans and deposit shop, right. So the key really coming back down to -- so if we start actually diversifying the income stream, what does that mean? My position is that we know exactly what's the healthiest way to grow East West Bank balance sheet and our P&L, and we understand how we should look at our performance comparing with our peers. And as long as we continue to outperform our peers and sit in the top quartile, we're good. So that's the reason why I look at it, if the efficiency ratio went from 36% to 40%, it's not a big deal. And quite frankly, right now, it looks ridiculously low right now, so I'm not too worried about it.